🇮🇳 INDIA Hamara Azli DUSHMAN 🔥‼️ Mas'ala KASHMIR | بھارت ہمارا ازلی دشمن | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
- ✅️ Relevant Videos :
🔥 FAUJI Taqat Ki HAQEEQAT ‼️ فوجی طاقت کی حقیقت | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
• 🔥 FAUJI Taqat Ki HAQEE...
🔥 GHAMIDI Sahib Ki Fouj Per Tanqeed ‼️ غامدی صاحب کی فوج پر تنقید | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
• 🔥 GHAMIDI Sahib Ki Fou...
🇵🇰 Is PAKISTAN A Religious State ❓️ | کیا پاکستان مذہبی ریاست ہے؟ || JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
• 🇵🇰 Is PAKISTAN A Reli...
🇮🇳 INDIA Hamara Azli DUSHMAN 🔥‼️ Mas'ala KASHMIR | بھارت ہمارا ازلی دشمن | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
• 🇮🇳 INDIA Hamara Azli D...
🇵🇰⚔️🇮🇳 REALITY Of 1965 WAR ‼️ 1965 جنگ کی حقیقت | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
• 🇵🇰⚔️🇮🇳 REALITY Of 1965...
👀 BUDGET of Pakistan Army ‼️🔥 فوج کا بجٹ | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
• 👀 BUDGET of Pakistan A...
😡 BUSINESSES of PAKISTAN ARMY 🤯‼️ پاک فوج کے مختلف کاروبار | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
• 🔥 BUSINESSES of PAKIST...
🌕 NOTE:
Javed Ahmad Ghamidi's scholarly work has often been subject to premature criticism, with individuals frequently evaluating the conclusions without fully understanding the underlying arguments. A truly scholarly approach would involve a thorough examination of his reasoning and evidence before forming judgments. Here are playlists on those objections ignorant people put against Javed Ahmad Ghamidi.
🔵 RESPONSE TO 23 QUESTIONS:
◽ Meezan Aur Furqan: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ What is Sunnah: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Itmam e Hujjat: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Qiraat Ka Ikhtelaf: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Excommunication (Takfeer): • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Singing & Music: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Veil (Pardah): • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Beard (Darhi): • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ First Revelation: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Halal & Forbidden: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Splitting of the Moon: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Isra-o-Mairaaj: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Return of Jesus: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Arrival of Mahdi: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Interest / Usury (Sood): • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Human Nature: • Response to 23 Questio...
◽ Jannat Ki Hoor: • Response to 23 Questio...
🔵 OTHER TOPICS:
◽ Introduction to Quran: • QURAN Ka TAARUF - Intr...
◽ Hujjiyat-e-Hadith: • Hujjiyat e Hadith - Ja...
◽ Dawat Ka Tariqah: • DAWAT E DEEN SERIES
◽ Ahl-e-Sunnat Ke Aqaid: • عقائد سیریز | Aqaid Se...
◽ ALI (r.a) aur Muawiya (r.a): • Hazrat Ali (ra) aur Am...
◽ Foj Ka Bayaniah: • Bayania Series | Fouj ...
◽ Mishkat Dars on Ramzan: • Nabi Ki Batain - Yasal...
◽ Dallas Lectures: • Dallas Lectures - Coun...
◽ Conversing Islam: • Conversing Islam with ...
◽ Meezan Lectures: / @ghamidicil
◽ Al-Bayan Lectures: / @ghamidicil
Jāvēd Ahmed Ghāmidī (Urdu: جاوید احمد غامدی) (born April 7, 1952) is a Pakistani Muslim theologian, Quran scholar, Islamic modernist, exegete and educationist. He is also the founding President of Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences.
Ghamidi's conclusions and understanding of Islam, including the Sharia, has been presented concisely in his book Mizan with the intention of presenting the religion in its pure shape, cleansed from tasawwuf, qalam, fiqh, all philosophies and any other contaminants.
◽ He on Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.o...
Hashtags: #javedahmadghamidi #india #kashmir #army
🔥 FAUJI Taqat Ki HAQEEQAT ‼️ فوجی طاقت کی حقیقت | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
ua-cam.com/video/GR_k7HgnUa8/v-deo.html
🔥 GHAMIDI Sahib Ki Fouj Per Tanqeed ‼️ غامدی صاحب کی فوج پر تنقید | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
ua-cam.com/video/0UZJrdcyf6E/v-deo.html
🇵🇰 Is PAKISTAN A Religious State ❓️ | کیا پاکستان مذہبی ریاست ہے؟ || JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
ua-cam.com/video/6TQrZT3NrVs/v-deo.html
🇮🇳 INDIA Hamara Azli DUSHMAN 🔥‼️ Mas'ala KASHMIR | بھارت ہمارا ازلی دشمن | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
ua-cam.com/video/0tEabn_ABZo/v-deo.html
🇵🇰⚔️🇮🇳 REALITY Of 1965 WAR ‼️ 1965 جنگ کی حقیقت | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
ua-cam.com/video/FvYnmg9TMcY/v-deo.html
👀 BUDGET of Pakistan Army ‼️🔥 فوج کا بجٹ | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
ua-cam.com/video/x8BpK0AOx-k/v-deo.html
😡 BUSINESSES of PAKISTAN ARMY 🤯‼️ پاک فوج کے مختلف کاروبار | JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI
ua-cam.com/video/7Jiza3qg9L4/v-deo.html
Excellent analysis by ghamdi sahib.
I proud to be Indian muslim
Hindustan mein rehna hai Jai shree Ram kehna hai😂😂..
Nice joke u indian
Nutshell :- This very very sophisticated elaboration is exactly
like 2 + 2 = 4 . Stop claiming 2+2 = 3 OR 2+2
= 5
رب ھب لنا حکما و علما و نورا و ایمانا ۔
Perfect answer..
Excellent Analysis
جتنے مسلمان پاکستان میں ہیں ۔۔۔ الحمدللہ اس سے زیادہ مسلمان ہندوستان میں ہیں ۔۔۔۔۔ محمد علی جناء نے بہت غلط کیا ، ہمیں اس بات کا بہت افسوس ھے۔۔۔۔۔ کاش ہندوستان کی تقسیم نہ ہوتی ۔۔۔۔ ہم سلام پیش کرتے ہیں مولانا ابوالکلام آزاد کو۔۔۔
کافر کبھی بھای نہھں بن سکتا ھے
Agreed with ghamdi sahib
Jinnah's politics was communal and it proved disastrous.
Thanks Allah Jinnah played communal politics and I am safe in Pakistan otherwise I had to face communal oppression of Modi in 2024.
@@MaturemindsPlease take the Muslims from India
@@Maturemindsyes u can get Atta whenever u want and u are safe in mosque from TTP suicide bombing, no inflation issue, no electricity price issue, no passport issue, no Balochistan attack issue and no Vigo issue.
Congratulations 😂
What about BJP which proves jinah right
@@waninisar9201 Who came first Jinnah or BJP.
Jinnah policies made BJP agressive against Muslims who committed terrorist activities across India supported by Pakistan created by Jinnah.
Cause and effect theory
At that time the rular of J&K was Hari Singh ji a Hindu but not a Sikh. Beautiful commentary.
Excellent explanation
سب سے پہلے تو دشمنی کی تعریف طے ہونی چاہئیے۔یعنی دشمنی اور تنازعہ وغیرہ میں کیا فرق ہے۔کیا دشمنی کا ارتکاب ہمیشہ اعلانیہ ہی کیا جاتا ہے اور اگر اعلان کئیے بغیر دشمنی کی جائے تو وہ دشمنی نہیں ہوتی ؟
I am from kashmir
Jinnah, s ideology was right while we see now the treatment with Muslims in India since last ten years.
thanx jazakaallah qairun
ریاستوں کے پاس تیسرا آپشن، یعنی آزادی یا نیم خودمختاری والا آپشن نہیں تھا۔
Where are kashmiri people there .....no where......those abt who these two countries decide future they have no say ........isn't it injustice?
Mohtaram Ghamidi sahab
We could not have expected a better video from a Liberal Muslim like you . I would request you to educate yourself on Kashmir . Your sources are without any doubt unauthentic .
Kindly enlighten me with “authentic” sources.
غامدی صاحب لفظوں سے کھیل رہے ہیں، کوئی بتائے تنازع اور دشمنی میں فرق کیا ہے، تنازع کے بغیر دشمنی نہیں ہوتی، تنازع حل ہو جائے تو دشمنی ختمم۔ تنازع یا دشمنی تو ہے پاکستان اور بھارت کے درمیان، ہاں یہ بات درست ہے کہ ازلی ابدی نہیں، قابل حل تنازع ہے
All creator one for all kaisay sebki dushmani ko mitayay bagair munsif aur vakil overall hosakta uska adalu insaf aur faisla seb per havi hay .hidustan hay ya pak ya iran ya afganistan ruse hay ya america ya africa yeh seb is ak jahan kay juday huay tukday hain aur iski akta seb per havi hay.yeh baday taqetun ki taqseemkari aur apni apni chodrahet thodi jahan ki ak akta mutasir kersakti hay voh to qudret hay seb taqstun ka ant uskay qadmun talay....isliay khah pak ho ya hind ho donu ki gerden aur ser is ak jahan ki akta kay samnay khaliq malik kay aagay serbesajude hain......
I m from Kashmir (IOK) NEXT VEDIO PLZ
Hinduism and Islam were the two main religions of subcontinent therefore why is , two nations theory is taught in schools for creation of two countries. Muslim can be from any nation. or country. Similarly, majority Muslims in subcontinent were from the same nation who accepted Islam. So the nation was one but has two different major religions. People of that time have chosen either Pakistan or India according to their own personal interest at that time but they didn’t have the right to decide for the future generations .as one can’t decide for a person who is 18 and above in elected government Those who voted for Pakistan or india are died long time ago therefore my question is were their voting for future generations valid. They should have continued voting fafter 5 or 10 years for generations of time.
Only people in Pakistan voted, the people in India were never given a chance.
They should have voted as well...
There are not just two nations, there are multiple nations.
The religious based nationhood is separate from an ethnic based nationhood. Please Recognise the difference.
Before 1947, India was never a country, nor a nation. It was always merely a region, nothing more.
There's no such thing as an Indian ethnicity.
Bengali are an ethnic group,
Tamil are an ethnic group,
Maratha are an ethnic group, and so on...
Indian isn't an ethnicity. It's a broad cultural grouping, that's it.
MahaRaja Haree Sing ( dogra rajpoot , hindu ) was determined
for third option of the partion plan . His choice was going to be a great favour to PAKISTAN nd the KASHMIRIS .As u know above 80 % population of the state was Muslim nd there was no communal discrimination .
Wonder how Mulim League leadership was obsessed by the idea of accessation of Hyderabad (Daccan ) nd Junagarh states to pakistan where majority poulation was non Muslim , in addition Hyderabad was a landlocked state . How they proposed the undemocratic way of accessation of states by the choice of the rulers surpassing the choice of the population ?
@@sultanhashmi201 They attacked even before Maharaja made any decision. This enraged him
@@arifmaghribi . This was very unfortunate . Had been wasting chances 1 × 1 .
Dushmani ki buniyad hi tanaazaa hai !
ابوالکلام آزاد نے یہی کہا تھا کہ دنیا آنے والے ادوار میں گلوبل ویلج کی حیثیت حاصل کر جائے گی
Title mai Question mark ❓ lagaen.
Ghamdi sab tusi great o lekin ye vedio 2 bar dekhi kuch khopri me ni betha
Janab tanazy ka hal agr mojood hay to fir bi iss ko ignore Kiya ja raha ho iss fitrat say dosti kasy
Sir mohtaram Ranjeet Singh SB kee hakomat theee
Shirk and Tawhid are indeed Azali and Abadi enemies. They do represent Shirk and i don't know if Gamdhi Sahib does represent Tawhid
So shameful of you to look at this political issue as nationalistic Islamist !
Stop sounding like ISIS
That hypocritic scholar in unaware of kashmir problem kashmir was not a part of Indian subcontinent it was an independent state which was annexed by akbar by force so the formula of partition does not apply on kashmir we have different culture geography food everything different from Indian subcontinent and that is why we wanted independence from India and Pakistan from day one of partition and this struggle will go on I wonder who call ghamdi a scholar
All of the subcontinent had a history the real question is what was the situation at that time in Kashmir and what could people do about it
Shut up.
چلو جی تسی دوست بنا لو غامدی صاحب؛ ہمارے تو وہ دشمن ہیں.
You are denying the fact that India has forcefully occupied Kashmir and is not willing to give Kashmiris their right to decide . India had lied to take full control of that region and once it was done India refused any sort of settlement on Kashmir . Might is right and this is the case in Kashmir ,Palestine and elsewhere .
Read three superb reports of 1947 and 1948, at the united nations. Your eyes will open with knowledge. Remember what Allah has said as the first word in the holy Quran. ILM, get knowledge.
Make a video on jinnah's lifestyle. Was jinnah was a pig Eater.
No, he only liked a particular kind of ham from England, and yes it was made of pork.
Im kashmiri and i eat beef
@@shc399 I am a Muslim, and have to go to China often. After I came to know that it almost impossible to not get some pork in your ordered food, I started ordering Pork. Trust me it is really good, especially their braised Dongpo pork, and shredded pork with garlic sauce. I eat and then recite Astaghfirullah.
@@JangBahadur-zn1fttrue, Chinese consume the worlds highest amount of pork meat, and now even the Muslims in China are almost forced to eat it.
inshallah inshallah pok will be part of india soon
مذہبی پلیٹ فارم پر شدید ناکامی کے بعد اب یہ سیاسی معاملات میں اپنی نابالغانہ گفتگو فرمارہے ہیں۔ اللہ اللہ یہ وقت بھی آنا تھا۔ ۔بہتر تھا کہ کچھ پڑھ ہی لیتے۔
Mr. Javed Ahmad Ghamidi Sahib as you are always clam to be a student , please read the History of Kashmir and modify your this talk honestly.
Before ( ie 1932) and during 1947 kashmiris were already struggling / fighting for Independence from Dogra kingdom.
Let me educate you sir, Pakistan was British India before 14 Aug 1947. Kashmir was not part of British India While Kashmir was an Independent kingdom under Dogra kingdom.
Your hypothetical, imaginary delusionary views are not acceptable with regard to kashmir and its struggle against two Dajjal, Murderer, Terrorist, Aggressors. Who are responsible to kill rape lac's of innocent kashmiris.(Unfortunate , the modern world is now branding the suppressing citizens of kashmiris as terrorist because of their own meger interests ). Shame on world comunity and so called intellectual for supporting these two Aggressors.
But we are having faith and are optimistic.
Before 1947, India was never a country, nor a nation. It was always merely a region, nothing more.
Punjab and Bengal were partitioned, not India. There's a difference, please recognise it.
Before India, there was British India, a country with an internationally recognized passport and flag.
@@auh786 British India, a colony created by the British, who conquered a region by defeating dozens of kingdoms, it took them 100 years to conquer this region.
Region, not a country.
India the country was created in 1947.
@@youknow6968 Yes, and after the Company conquered the region in 1857 the British Crown took over the region as the colony of British India. A colony is also a country. It’s just not a sovereign country.
The partition was of British India, in the provinces of Punjab, Bengal and Assam.
We’re only arguing semantics.
@@auh786 you're arguing semantics, I'm discussing history. I'd appreciate it if you can control your arrogance, it leaves a bad taste.
You are discussing a narrow band of history, while ignoring everything else. That's just wrong.
When India is discussed as a country, the clear claim is that India was a country, the British conquered it by playing divide and rule.
There was no country of India, the British created India, so the idea of historical India is factually incorrect.
You can't divide to rule something you've created.
Furthermore, a colony is not a country, you're imposing further semantics and lazy history on a set of broken facts...
The British took over after 1857, legal process of creating a nation state was through a process of various legislations. The most relevant really was the British India act of 1935, which can be classified as a step towards creating a nation state, that's a mere 12 years before the British left.
The entire division argument is still being used to spread hate politics in the region.
By using The childishly wrong claim that the British conquered a country called India, and left by dividing it into pieces it's utterly ridiculous.
There was no India the country.
The British created India.
The British assisted in trapping the princely states, so British even helped India consolidate when they were leaving.
When they came, there were dozens of kingdoms, when they left, there were two, that's not a division. History has to be judged considering all the facts, not a narrow set of statements.
@@youknow6968 You’re still confusing British India (1858-1947), Dominion of India (1947-51) and the Republic of India (1951- …). All three are considered countries in their own right. The Government of India Act 1935 is only the last of a series of similar Parliamentary Acts going back a century prior. British India had its own legislative assembly, currency, passport, military, defined borders and even Olympic teams.
The British created British India (country) out of the various kingdoms and regions of the Indian Subcontinent (not a country). Princely states were separate entities.
In the end, UK divided the country of British India into two separate countries Pakistan and India, with Dominion status.
Hope that’s clear now.
Ghamidi sb ki Zahanat kowa jaisi hai😂😂😂
مجھے تو یہ باتیں بے تکی لگی ہیں۔
J.L Nehru and Jinnah responsible for this partition. Both were egoistic personalities. Even in 2024 wounds of partition not healed.
What partition?
You need to read history properly.
Before 1947, India was never a country, nor a nation. It was always merely a region, nothing more.
Punjab and Bengal were partitioned, not India, please learn the difference.
@@youknow6968 Are you a paid troll? Even during Mughal empire India was a country.
@@arifmaghribi if you're going to throw insults, I can do the same, grow up.
Learn the difference between a country, a kingdom, an empire. These are different terms because they have different meanings.
Mughals were not a country, please learn basic understandings before discussing history. Mughals ruled over their empire, they were not conquer a country called India, they conquered a region.
The region of South Asia has been loosely known by various names primarily India, and hindustan, these names were given by foreigners for a region without a name of it's own. These names were also largely used for the north.
Bharat is a name out of religious texts, there was never a country or kingdom or an empire called bharat. The name was taken from a king of a tiny kingdom near Nepal, his name was bharatha, that's where the name comes from, it has no actual historical reality.
There's lots of modern day re-imagining of history of South Asia, most of it is false.
The Mongols ruled most of Asia, is Asia a Mongol country?
The Roman empire lasted over 1000 years, covering most of Europe, and North Africa.
Is Europe and North Africa a single country?
Please understand before following lazy history we've been fed.
A country or a nation has certain parameters, none of them apply to India.
Historically India was always merely a region, nothing more. Like other regions around the world, it has dozens of kingdoms. Occasionally empires.
India came into existence in 1947.
The Mughals ruled by creating an empire over the Region of India, not the country of India. Please understand the difference.
@@youknow6968 Firstly it is CONQUERED not CONQUER. By your appalling logic Germany, Russia, France also WERE not countries.
@@arifmaghribi
Present your arguments, your points, don't twist what I say, it's very immature.
How is Germany, France and Russia relevant to this discussion, and my point?
You've not understood a single thing I said.
Is what-aboutism the best you can do?
No arguments of your own, just empty statements without any basis, without any meaning. No wonder Pakistanis are messed up, you don't have a single original thought between the 250 millions of you. It's really pitiful.
Furthermore, don't continue behaving like a child, I'm writing on the phone, spelling and grammar isn't on top of my list, presenting my point is.
If it makes you happy, please continue your nitpicking. Because that's the best you can do.
What Javed Ghamdi sahab is speaking is very far from Reality. Absolutely wierd and bizarre Analysis.
جھوٹ مت بولو کشمیر نہ پاکستان کا حصہ تھا نہ ہے اور نہ رہے گا اور نہ کسی کا تاج ہے
ہم سالوں سے غلام تھے اور ہیں
Ghamdi sab na is topic pa bi chawal hi mari hai