love your videos extremely clean and to the point, can you do a video where you run pathtracing for the intel b580 at 1080p with xess quality and other xess qualities too? thank you
Please ADD Spiderman Remastered dx12 in which B580 SHINES +50% VS 4060 and GTA5 dx11 where Intel dx11 drivers are BAD and AMD cards also worse then NVIDIA competition. USE DLSS mod for GTA and NVE overhaul mod (6GB vram on 1k=1080p) Using DLAA (in Wukong) isnt best. DLDSR has more details than DLAA Test 12GB B580 & competition 4060/6700xt in 1440p RT FG /and/ 4K DLSS RT FG to the breakpoint WHERE 1st goes OUT OF VRAM - and the winner takes it all 😀 Always use TEXTURES CINEMATIC / ULTRA to show impact on VRAM - we need to push Nvidia to release 12 or 16 GB IN LOW END 4060 ! 😁 THANKS 😃
battlemage shows its driver hiccup free and totally a normal card in comparision to nvidia and amd , and it is way better in terms of stability compared to its predecessor, given how the architecturally it has changed the driver fixes will be way faster and better as it runs a lot of it on metal without translation layeers
50/50 It is not the same case as with the ARC A, they have had good drivers for a long time, so I highly doubt that they have much room for improvement with the B series, since it is not their first time.
I mean for 249$ and you has almost same performance to rx6700xt while also 12gb which is one of the best value card ever from Intel, hope they make B770 can surpass rtx4070 at affordable price.
@@caa4118 and it will surely have 16gb of vram. Problem is they did not even mention the b770 yet, so if it exists it won't come out in the near future, at that point it will be threatened by AMD and Nvidia new offerings. That is why I'm not even sure they will produce any. It might be even ready, but if Intel thinks it won't undercut the competition by a good margin they won't even launch it, avoiding so to lose money on it. A shame, but I'm also happy if they keep releasing a couple of sub 300$ cards per gen.
Where is it 249$ ??? I am aware that you from us of a are oblivious that anything exists outside of your bouble....but news flash,us of a is NOT entire existing world.
No it's not, imagine if they collaborated instead of trying to one up each other, hiding technologies from each other, sabotaging each other (like Intel did), we'd probably have some of the PCs in the market for absurdly low prices. But hey, you guys really love capitalism huh?
this is their first lineup, many other companies/brands will make this card, make sure to preorder when you get word.. also theyre going to make its older brother real soon, thats the b770 and b780.... they will prob be pcie 5.0 x16 and will be 33-50% stronger. while the b580 is awesome at a 250 price, im just waiting to preorder its older brothers when available
Yea Eurooean pricing is weird. Here in Asia its cheaper than 6700 xt and 4060. That said many still prefer 4060 over 6700xt and B580 here owing to its long standing brand support
sad that plenty of new/recent games that can't even reach 60fps at native at 1080p on cards that used to be considered 1440p cards not long ago. My 3060 used to be considered a 1080p "max" card, but in newer games, it can't even come close to 60fps at native.
New GPUs are around the corner, it's not worth to get a GPU this old with poor RT performance, no AI upscaler etc anyway, unless you're getting it for sub $220.
People here,spoiler alert : since it's a new territory for Intel obviously the price will be less and very competitive, but as soon as it begins to gain traction the prices will surely go up to as high as 300-350 dollars. After all, any company's final goal is to make money, not make the gaming community happy about destroying Nvidia Monopoly! P.S : TBH I think Intel has so far done a great job in GPU advancements.
they might not exist, Intel is having an existential moment. They are selling these cards at a loss and thus cannot continue to make too many of these. Also, buying this card may only get you support so far, as Intel's drivers may not exist in the future if they are split and broken up as a company into parts.
I just bought one for 359 dollars canadian (249 US). I feel bad for those outside of North America who most likely won't be able to get it for that price.
i recently bought an rx 7800xt and i'm very happy about it, but seeing this video made me even happier! At last Intel is back in the game and does a great job on what AMD used to do!! NVIDIA have become greedier and greedier and AMD stood almost idle, INTEL seems to have caught the market's pulse and will surely do great in this gen!
I also recently got the 7800xt, couldn't be happier. Definitely excited over new gen but also feeling a little uneasy about my investment when seeing this generational gap. Hope that amd and nvidia will have similarly good launches.
@arctic_void uneasy? The 7700XT beats this card easily and the 7800XT is arguably the best performing card for the money from Nvidia or AMD, plus 16gb of vram. You have nothing to feel uneasy about! As for Intel, they didn't have a choice but to aim for the budget market. They were just as greedy as Nvidia for eons....but I do like Tom, the guy that left Nvidia and now runs their driver development team. They still got plenty of work to do, but this launch is way better than Alchemist.
Considering that intel card and drivers are brand new, and the way intel worked on the alchemist drivers, this thing looks like a winner because you know it is going to get better. I don't see team green wanting to sell 5060 silicon for even close to that cheap, we'll see. It doesn't appear to be a paper launch either, because a lot of genuine benchmarking is showing up now.
@@raresmacovei8382debateable, "RT performance" encompasses quite a wide variety of effects. You are making a blanket statement that may not describe the reality of how some buyers play their games.
The latest Intel card is barely beating the 4 year old last gen AMD card... doesn't look that good tbh. Still loses to the 4060 at Raytracing with DLSS/XESS. Also nvidia has better drivers and Upscaling.
@@adlibconstitution1609 The RTX $300 4060 8Gb model still beats the B580 at Raytracing and upscaling. So anyone would pay the extra $50 for better raytracing and upscaling and better drivers from Nvidia. The 6700XT is 4 years old. Nobody pays MSRP for a 4 year old GPU from 2 generations ago.
You can get it, but you can't make use of it because virtually no modern games are made with dual GPUs in mind. Not to mention linking 2 GPUs is dead as well, at least in the average consumer market.
Wait till month end if the arc b580 is below 23k buy it or you will be getting a rx 6700xt at 20 k if the arc b580 is above 25k don't buy it there are better options available
The power to performance is beast..if Intel somehow slap this chipset as a dGPU on gaming laptops..i would probably getting one..this would be as good as RTX 4k series laptops..
can we see a comparison of the b580 on a pcie x16 3.0 vs a pcie 4.0 motherboard? i keep seeing how a 4.0 x8 card will be half as fast on a pcie 3.0 x16 motherboard
Not hating on intel, but even if there are some negative points, the pricing for product is impressive. HOWEVER, most of the advantage of b580 is in its perf/ dollar value, something which sadly only works IF you can actually buy the card at msrp (and thar is a big if). Majority of the b580 being sold are over 300usd (sometimes well over 300). And at those prices, other cards like the 6700xt that just performs better (evenn if older) are actually a better perf/ dollar card. So unless intel can actually provide enough supply to make sure people can reliably get the card at around 250, the "win" for intel's b580 is sadly for most (unless you are one of the few whoe were able to snag one at msrp) is just something that is on paper, and not a realistic possibility
Newegg restock is Jan 3rd. dont buy those way overpriced Gunnir models on amazon etc.. those companies are insane for charging that much. but with them having basically the only available AIB right now.. they can.
@@kkrolik2106 This is a great youtube channel and one of the few i trust. I checked other reviews and the B580 uses between 98W to 120W in most of the games tested in 1080p. Just because it's listed '' 185W '' doesn't mean its going to be using all that power. I think the main thing to take away from this video is too show how power hungry AMD cards have always been
@@ConnorH2111 Yeah I guess so. I don't think you need to undervolt the 4070 super its already efficient enough. This is why Nvidia cards of that generation are loved because all of them are plug and play. I remember when the 3000 series came out during covid everyone was obsessed with undervolting them
I feel it would be cool to see comparisons for older or random/niche games, for driver compatibility, since that's apparently not extremely well optimized, since the ARCs are comparatively new.
Quite a misleading benchmark... Using XeSS... And without clearly specifying in which ones it is used and in which ones it is not, or if it is used for both or what rescaling is used with each graph...
@@faris-ali just because you got fooled by the marketing doesn't mean its real dude 🤣 omg you are so funny, its like saying PS5 is an 8K console just because its printed on the box 🤣🤣
@timestamppatrol depends on games then, Toms reported 165W across their games. So saying around 180W is nothing wrong given Intel themselves claim 190 TBP.
@@_TrueDesire_ yeah sure. I want to see potential of this card (b580) being undervoltage. And apparently no one doing it yet. Undervoltaged 6700XT 100-120 watts by just losing 1-5 fps depite being older than b580
To me, this is the most important comparison. You could get a 6700xt for under $300 not too long ago. The B580 struggles in some games, so it's an inconsistent experience. And the drivers for brand new games and old games are sometimes not great. +$50 is worth it for a 6700xt. I don't think intel moved the bar that much for price:performance. This is more like 6700xt replacement since they aren't in stock anymore. It should have launched at $220, then it would be worth it. Once new entry level gpus from nvidia and amd release, maybe the price will drop to $220 though
Please run benchmarks of b580 with RT enabled in applicable games as well. I'm seeing other benchmarks where with RT enabled and upscaling it hit 2k 60 fps on the latest titles. If it's actually possible this card's going to change the market a bit.
I got my rtx 3060ti last year second hand, I use it on my channel even for 230 dollars. I think this ARC B580 is very similar in performance, and new, at an excellent price, I would go for it without hesitation. Congratulations Intel, have +4gb vram.
This card being so good in its segment (for now) really makes me curious about the B770. It may be released once amd and nvidia show their respective cards putting Intel in an interesting situation.
The only issue really is driver maturity here. Specs are basically the same between the RX 6700 XT while the B580 runs slightly faster and the memory is also slightly faster. Within 1 year, I think the B580 will consistently outperform the RX 6700 XT while running at much lower wattage.
Please test pre-Starfield Bethesda titles. Fallout 4 and Fallout 76 for example still have pretty obvious and offensive issues with pop-in and shadows. As an early adopter of the A series that still stings and I'd hate to swing for a B series card just to find the issue persists.
@@_Glory_to_God that is intel's biggest problem I believe, they still struggle to use die area efficiently, so they have much lower margins than AMD and especially Nvidia. I hope they hold on for another 2 generations, the situation should improve
That's the point, people are comparing the new ARC's with AMD/NVIDIA from 2 or 4 years ago, that doesn't make Intel looks bad, no, they're evolving and in good state, but when the new gen of the others come out they should surpass the ARC models by a lot.
As a desktop version, it is still doubtful, but in the laptop form factor it is quite an interesting solution, with a typical tgp laptop of 100 watts, it will give 90+% of the performance of its desktop version.
Intel should start making high end cards. The budget market is pretty saturated already, it’s the high end when the lack of choice is the issue. It’s 4080 or 7900 xt/xtx or nothing
Just imagine how good the b750 and b770 are going to be I can't wait I own a 6700xt red devil love it been a great gpu but Intel is really ding the gaming community a solid with this gpu so I'm going to support them
The B580 is a great win for Intel, it also shows at the low end you need to pick your GPU based on the games you play. Almost never a clear winner when you compare 2 similar priced cards. Let's just hope Intel doesn't realize this competes with a 350 dollar card and since they are selling every card they can make...
This is what it means by having more VRAM, it doesnt make a difference if the card itself has budget level specs, doesnt matter how much VRAM you add the budget cards will never make good utilization of thos extra VRAM in games to provide playable framerates. if for some reason you were to use all 12GB on any game, the card will simply provide unplayable frame that is under 60 for sure in which case you are better off dropping 2-4 gb vram and get almost double or even more framerates 12GB VRAM on budget cards are just a gimmick, 8GB is more than enough on entry level / budget tier cards, Mid tier minimum 12 is advisable but even then 16GB is not that required as mid tier ccards are not meant for ultra level gameplay . High tier cards altho should have 16GB VRAM (like 4070ti should have had 16GB but at least the super vairant have 16GB thats nice)
I hate Intel but they've been dunked on so much lately that I'm happy for them getting a win for once. Also I love more actual competition in the GPU space. Thats a win for everyone.
Just utilizig 50-60% power of 6700 xt in many games. This GPU def needs more driver level optimisation to be competetive. I played CS2, Valorant, Apex Legends, Fortnite, etc ie competition shooters and the performance was bad. Like it had many issues with untimely frame drops. It performed worse than 4060 at 1080p and at 1440p it kind f levelled up or still at times gave jitters and issues. So Intel still has lot f work 2 do. I hope the next line up ie B770,B780 would be learning lessons and should perform better. From what I could source B780 will be a 350W TDP GPU. 16 GB GDDR6 memory. 256 bit bandwidth 3000 Mhz core frequency 28% more SMs than B580 Expects 20-30% more raster performance than B580 Target price of 350 USD. Should be a 1440p beast and wud perform almost as good as an RTX 4070 with 16 GB memory. I for 1 feel that will b a very good mid range GPU if they can pull it off as speculated. The RTX 5070 will be costing close to 600 usd. So a B780 wud make insane sense
Games :
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty - 0:09
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty | RT - 0:58
Black Myth Wukong - 1:52
Silent Hill 2 - 2:53
Starfield - 3:59
Forza Horizon 5 - 5:02
Ghost of Tsushima - 5:59
Alan Wake 2 - 6:49
God of War: Ragnarök - 7:47
Horizon Forbidden West - 8:46
Senua's Saga - Hellblade II - 9:44
System:
Windows 11
Ryzen 7 7800X3D - bit.ly/43e3VxW
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL38
Intel ARC B580 12GB - bit.ly/3OSOhCp
RADEON RX 6700 XT 12GB - bit.ly/38PlCta
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
love your videos extremely clean and to the point, can you do a video where you run pathtracing for the intel b580 at 1080p with xess quality and other xess qualities too? thank you
12gb and good RT 🗿
but I'm sure the scalpers will raise the price
Intel is not a serious company, tomorrow it can abandon everything, stop updating drivers or delete drivers altogether.
Please ADD Spiderman Remastered dx12 in which B580 SHINES +50% VS 4060 and GTA5 dx11 where Intel dx11 drivers are BAD and AMD cards also worse then NVIDIA competition. USE DLSS mod for GTA and NVE overhaul mod (6GB vram on 1k=1080p) Using DLAA (in Wukong) isnt best. DLDSR has more details than DLAA
Test 12GB B580 & competition 4060/6700xt in 1440p RT FG /and/ 4K DLSS RT FG to the breakpoint WHERE 1st goes OUT OF VRAM - and the winner takes it all 😀 Always use TEXTURES CINEMATIC / ULTRA to show impact on VRAM - we need to push Nvidia to release 12 or 16 GB IN LOW END 4060 ! 😁 THANKS 😃
Now Intel needs to mature their drivers and it's a clear win in the budget department.
Yup, hopefully that will improve the 1% and .1% lows to give a smoother experience. Good stuff!
battlemage shows its driver hiccup free and totally a normal card in comparision to nvidia and amd , and it is way better in terms of stability compared to its predecessor, given how the architecturally it has changed the driver fixes will be way faster and better as it runs a lot of it on metal without translation layeers
It eats a lot of power outside gaming
50/50
It is not the same case as with the ARC A, they have had good drivers for a long time, so I highly doubt that they have much room for improvement with the B series, since it is not their first time.
Clear win versus a 3 year old card 😂😂
Intel will still be behind AMD and NVIDIA’s latest tech.
I mean for 249$ and you has almost same performance to rx6700xt while also 12gb which is one of the best value card ever from Intel, hope they make B770 can surpass rtx4070 at affordable price.
B770 would probably just be a little worse than RTX 4070 but would be sold at around $400 hopefully
Increase that to 300€ and it will be accurate.
@@caa4118 and it will surely have 16gb of vram. Problem is they did not even mention the b770 yet, so if it exists it won't come out in the near future, at that point it will be threatened by AMD and Nvidia new offerings. That is why I'm not even sure they will produce any. It might be even ready, but if Intel thinks it won't undercut the competition by a good margin they won't even launch it, avoiding so to lose money on it.
A shame, but I'm also happy if they keep releasing a couple of sub 300$ cards per gen.
if its under 400 it will become a best seller.
Where is it 249$ ???
I am aware that you from us of a are oblivious that anything exists outside of your bouble....but news flash,us of a is NOT entire existing world.
competition is always a good thing
yep, we have more price and choices on the market
After they start making money everything gets more expensive they get blinded
No it's not, imagine if they collaborated instead of trying to one up each other, hiding technologies from each other, sabotaging each other (like Intel did), we'd probably have some of the PCs in the market for absurdly low prices. But hey, you guys really love capitalism huh?
15.12.2024 The price for the Intel B580 is 347,- $ today in Germany. Same price like RX 6750 XT.
this is their first lineup, many other companies/brands will make this card, make sure to preorder when you get word..
also theyre going to make its older brother real soon, thats the b770 and b780.... they will prob be pcie 5.0 x16 and will be 33-50% stronger.
while the b580 is awesome at a 250 price, im just waiting to preorder its older brothers when available
Yea Eurooean pricing is weird.
Here in Asia its cheaper than 6700 xt and 4060. That said many still prefer 4060 over 6700xt and B580 here owing to its long standing brand support
У этой видеокарты есть проблемы с драйверами ? @@1989rs500
Intel's energy efficiency is simply impressive
yeah, the price too
They improve a lot with their Battlemage generation, the first gen is way too power hungry, hope amd 8000 series will have better power efficiency
you're comparing it with a 4 year old architecture of AMD, also the b580 consumes 180 W, don't get fooled by these bemchmarks
its not, that not a TGP at all, its a TDP.
@@notenjoying666 Battlemage is 5nm, not 3nm. There's a big difference between 5nm and 3nm.
sad that plenty of new/recent games that can't even reach 60fps at native at 1080p on cards that used to be considered 1440p cards not long ago.
My 3060 used to be considered a 1080p "max" card, but in newer games, it can't even come close to 60fps at native.
Breaks my heart cause I have 6700XT
good thing with AMD is that you can just use RSR :)
@@_TrueDesire_ FSR
@gitzart7950 nah I mean RSR. I use it in games without FSR support.
@@_TrueDesire_ oh sorry I just checked what RSR was. I knew that but didn't knew what it was called before 😅
Waiting for 1440p video as intel does better in higher resolutions.
Seeing intel at cyberpunk this clean was big Surprise. It even beats 4060 in cyberpunk!
The latency and 1% lows still need cleaned up
It beats 4060ti in cyberpunk!
4060 loose to it in literally every title
need 1440p benchmarks
coming soon
Yes that's where it shines acc to reviewers
@@TestingGames Yes please
en 1440 la ARC B580 no sirve es muy mala solo sirve para 1080,p y es peor que la rtx 4060 y mucho peor que la rx 6700xt
i saw someone test b580 with 7600xt in 2k 1440p.. the fps didnt have much different
good results for b580, considering that you won't find rx 6700 xt at a normal price
if you know where to look you can. no.. not ebay or jawa or amazon or aliexpress or any of those places.
do you know why 6700 did better than a580 in alan wake 2?
@@joen4287 I don't know. Maybe lack of optimization, maybe somethine else.
New GPUs are around the corner, it's not worth to get a GPU this old with poor RT performance, no AI upscaler etc anyway, unless you're getting it for sub $220.
@@Tx_zx I see, ty
Thanks a lot I have been waiting for this comparison but i needed 1440p too
People here,spoiler alert : since it's a new territory for Intel obviously the price will be less and very competitive, but as soon as it begins to gain traction the prices will surely go up to as high as 300-350 dollars. After all, any company's final goal is to make money, not make the gaming community happy about destroying Nvidia Monopoly!
P.S : TBH I think Intel has so far done a great job in GPU advancements.
they might not exist, Intel is having an existential moment. They are selling these cards at a loss and thus cannot continue to make too many of these.
Also, buying this card may only get you support so far, as Intel's drivers may not exist in the future if they are split and broken up as a company into parts.
@@sacamentobob facts 🗣️
This channel is consistent if there's anything to say about it... Been coming back on and off for the past 10 years to look at gpu comparison.
b580 same price as rx 6750xt in my country, where did you get that b580 price?
I just bought one for 359 dollars canadian (249 US). I feel bad for those outside of North America who most likely won't be able to get it for that price.
hello mate, do you think you could make a b580 vs 6750 xt comparison for 1440p? Thanks.
look for techpower review
i recently bought an rx 7800xt and i'm very happy about it, but seeing this video made me even happier!
At last Intel is back in the game and does a great job on what AMD used to do!!
NVIDIA have become greedier and greedier and AMD stood almost idle, INTEL seems to have caught the market's pulse and will surely do great in this gen!
I also recently got the 7800xt, couldn't be happier. Definitely excited over new gen but also feeling a little uneasy about my investment when seeing this generational gap. Hope that amd and nvidia will have similarly good launches.
@arctic_void uneasy? The 7700XT beats this card easily and the 7800XT is arguably the best performing card for the money from Nvidia or AMD, plus 16gb of vram. You have nothing to feel uneasy about!
As for Intel, they didn't have a choice but to aim for the budget market. They were just as greedy as Nvidia for eons....but I do like Tom, the guy that left Nvidia and now runs their driver development team. They still got plenty of work to do, but this launch is way better than Alchemist.
Considering that intel card and drivers are brand new, and the way intel worked on the alchemist drivers, this thing looks like a winner because you know it is going to get better.
I don't see team green wanting to sell 5060 silicon for even close to that cheap, we'll see.
It doesn't appear to be a paper launch either, because a lot of genuine benchmarking is showing up now.
Is your ReBar on in Intel B580?
320- 350$ in Spain, Dead in is born
France too
yep 369 in France
Esta a 400€
You mean......dead on arrival? (DOA)
Poland - 370$
1:10 actually playable ray tracing performance
RT performance in this class is still not relevant.
@@raresmacovei8382debateable, "RT performance" encompasses quite a wide variety of effects. You are making a blanket statement that may not describe the reality of how some buyers play their games.
The latest Intel card is barely beating the 4 year old last gen AMD card... doesn't look that good tbh. Still loses to the 4060 at Raytracing with DLSS/XESS. Also nvidia has better drivers and Upscaling.
@@SemperValor Rx 6700xt MSRP is $479. Way above arc b580 $250 msrp
@@adlibconstitution1609 The RTX $300 4060 8Gb model still beats the B580 at Raytracing and upscaling. So anyone would pay the extra $50 for better raytracing and upscaling and better drivers from Nvidia. The 6700XT is 4 years old. Nobody pays MSRP for a 4 year old GPU from 2 generations ago.
Just a noob question, can we get dual b580 for 24gb vram?
no
You can get it, but you can't make use of it because virtually no modern games are made with dual GPUs in mind. Not to mention linking 2 GPUs is dead as well, at least in the average consumer market.
Sure, then you'll be able to have one in the living room and one in the basement.
why do you have a 1440p option but the games are played in full hd?
I like that Intel's GPU clock is static
It can go to 3200mhz after oc but it stops on 2850
in my country RX 6700xt $260 but ARC b580 not realeasd what should i buy
wait for B770 and new gen from AMD and Nvidia before you decide.
Rtx 4060 or later rtx 5060
Wait till month end if the arc b580 is below 23k buy it or you will be getting a rx 6700xt at 20 k if the arc b580 is above 25k don't buy it there are better options available
The power to performance is beast..if Intel somehow slap this chipset as a dGPU on gaming laptops..i would probably getting one..this would be as good as RTX 4k series laptops..
Отличный результат, когда они доделают драйвера будет потрясающая видеокарта
can we see a comparison of the b580 on a pcie x16 3.0 vs a pcie 4.0 motherboard? i keep seeing how a 4.0 x8 card will be half as fast on a pcie 3.0 x16 motherboard
RT on?
Bro i was waiting for this video, thx man love ya!!!
is the i3 13100f a good cpu for the arc b580?
You can test on warzone/bo6?
Not hating on intel, but even if there are some negative points, the pricing for product is impressive. HOWEVER, most of the advantage of b580 is in its perf/ dollar value, something which sadly only works IF you can actually buy the card at msrp (and thar is a big if). Majority of the b580 being sold are over 300usd (sometimes well over 300). And at those prices, other cards like the 6700xt that just performs better (evenn if older) are actually a better perf/ dollar card. So unless intel can actually provide enough supply to make sure people can reliably get the card at around 250, the "win" for intel's b580 is sadly for most (unless you are one of the few whoe were able to snag one at msrp) is just something that is on paper, and not a realistic possibility
Coming from a guy with a 6700xt, this is really impressive. Intel really flipped the tables on us. Great to see more competition.
Still no one upload blender cycles oneapi performance on Intel B580 vs intel previous gen and AMD HIP
Where did you buy it? I've seen it for $370.
Newegg restock is Jan 3rd. dont buy those way overpriced Gunnir models on amazon etc.. those companies are insane for charging that much. but with them having basically the only available AIB right now.. they can.
i am amd fanboy, but iam using nvidia card, and i am happy too with intel card, we have competitor now
Which is best for upcoming game 4060 or b580 ?
Just dont buy any Nvidia.
@@angeltzepesh1 intel arc b580 is better hands down bro
B580, easy.
What the hell in Cyberpunk ? That's UNBELIEVABLE !
any chance you test the new intel card on robocop?
Power efficiency is absolutely great. The only reason the temps aren't lower is because its a thin 2 fan card
AMD Rx 6700 xt use 217W Intel Arc B580 185W according to review from techpowerup. This UA-cam chanel lucks proper technical knowledge.
@@kkrolik2106 This is a great youtube channel and one of the few i trust. I checked other reviews and the B580 uses between 98W to 120W in most of the games tested in 1080p. Just because it's listed '' 185W '' doesn't mean its going to be using all that power. I think the main thing to take away from this video is too show how power hungry AMD cards have always been
@@Ladioz techpower take measurement via hardware probes no reporter via software.
4070 super is 50% faster and with an undervolt and 120fps cap it uses like 130w 🤷🏻
@@ConnorH2111 Yeah I guess so. I don't think you need to undervolt the 4070 super its already efficient enough. This is why Nvidia cards of that generation are loved because all of them are plug and play.
I remember when the 3000 series came out during covid everyone was obsessed with undervolting them
Finally someone has tested Hellblade II. 👏👏👏
I feel it would be cool to see comparisons for older or random/niche games, for driver compatibility, since that's apparently not extremely well optimized, since the ARCs are comparatively new.
Really good card +energy consumption 😍
Quite a misleading benchmark...
Using XeSS... And without clearly specifying in which ones it is used and in which ones it is not, or if it is used for both or what rescaling is used with each graph...
Why do 1080p while these cards are aimed at 1440p?
Huh ? B580 and 6700 xt is a 1080p card though lol
@Eleganttf2 if you go to any rx 6700xt gpu box it's literally printed on the front face 1440p 😑
@@faris-ali just because you got fooled by the marketing doesn't mean its real dude 🤣 omg you are so funny, its like saying PS5 is an 8K console just because its printed on the box 🤣🤣
@Eleganttf2 whatever dude 🤷
version driver?
In my country B280 + Tax = 299$ damn 🤬
Germany?
Correctio. Arc B580 $400
Nice that Intel gives similar performance with half of the power consumption and also a lower price.
the overlay doesn't report the full power consumption, in reality it's more around 180-190W. TPU reported 185W in gaming.
@@_TrueDesire_ GN, Jays and D'beur almost has the same result 120-150 watts with transient spike reach 190-200 watts
@timestamppatrol depends on games then, Toms reported 165W across their games. So saying around 180W is nothing wrong given Intel themselves claim 190 TBP.
@@_TrueDesire_ yeah sure. I want to see potential of this card (b580) being undervoltage. And apparently no one doing it yet. Undervoltaged 6700XT 100-120 watts by just losing 1-5 fps depite being older than b580
@@_TrueDesire_ CRY MORE AMD FANBOY
To me, this is the most important comparison. You could get a 6700xt for under $300 not too long ago. The B580 struggles in some games, so it's an inconsistent experience. And the drivers for brand new games and old games are sometimes not great. +$50 is worth it for a 6700xt. I don't think intel moved the bar that much for price:performance. This is more like 6700xt replacement since they aren't in stock anymore. It should have launched at $220, then it would be worth it. Once new entry level gpus from nvidia and amd release, maybe the price will drop to $220 though
Please run benchmarks of b580 with RT enabled in applicable games as well. I'm seeing other benchmarks where with RT enabled and upscaling it hit 2k 60 fps on the latest titles. If it's actually possible this card's going to change the market a bit.
I got my rtx 3060ti last year second hand, I use it on my channel even for 230 dollars. I think this ARC B580 is very similar in performance, and new, at an excellent price, I would go for it without hesitation. Congratulations Intel, have +4gb vram.
This card being so good in its segment (for now) really makes me curious about the B770. It may be released once amd and nvidia show their respective cards putting Intel in an interesting situation.
The only issue really is driver maturity here. Specs are basically the same between the RX 6700 XT while the B580 runs slightly faster and the memory is also slightly faster. Within 1 year, I think the B580 will consistently outperform the RX 6700 XT while running at much lower wattage.
That's crazy. Half the wattage too. Gj intel
it's actually not half because that's TDP not TBP. If you consider TBP it draws quite a bit more
If you have time can you compare it to Rtx 2080?
bro it mops the floor with the 2080ti the 30 and 40 series is where its at
Please test pre-Starfield Bethesda titles. Fallout 4 and Fallout 76 for example still have pretty obvious and offensive issues with pop-in and shadows. As an early adopter of the A series that still stings and I'd hate to swing for a B series card just to find the issue persists.
Never thought this day would come.....i want the B580 😱 Who know
Not great results considering the 6700XT launched 4 years ago
But only briefly hovered around 300$, majority of time this was 400$ card.
Is great considering there were no Intel GPUs 4 years ago, you can't just expect 4070 performance at this price on their 2nd try
@@_Glory_to_God that is intel's biggest problem I believe, they still struggle to use die area efficiently, so they have much lower margins than AMD and especially Nvidia. I hope they hold on for another 2 generations, the situation should improve
That's the point, people are comparing the new ARC's with AMD/NVIDIA from 2 or 4 years ago, that doesn't make Intel looks bad, no, they're evolving and in good state, but when the new gen of the others come out they should surpass the ARC models by a lot.
@@jackson13493AMD has been in the gpu market for decades while intel is just getting warmed up
I think more interesting will be tests without upscalers.
Kinda amazing for B580 to keep up with 6700XT even with low gpu wattage consumption 😮
wow didn't expect B580 at par or even faster than 6700XT
Look at that big power consumption differences!
As a desktop version, it is still doubtful, but in the laptop form factor it is quite an interesting solution, with a typical tgp laptop of 100 watts, it will give 90+% of the performance of its desktop version.
IMO gpu power is not accurate. It most likely drawing 150 minimum and then spikes to 180/90 considering the similiar temp and also similiar model.
Higher fps, lower watt.. Dang that's a win..
What about driver its error?
I need help, so i found this used 6700xt for 30k in our currency and b580 for 34k. Both from trusted shops
cheaper, more efficient , slightly faster in some games
, this is the new best budget GPU king
same performance with half of the power consumption is insane
What about older games? Still buggy? Thank you for the video by the way❤
Some games still crush
Great info
But I was told both these GPUs are 2K gaming capable and I see them both struggle in 1080 in some of the titles here. I'm lost now, please help.
Why everyone saying $250 US it’s not more like $365
Intel should start making high end cards. The budget market is pretty saturated already, it’s the high end when the lack of choice is the issue. It’s 4080 or 7900 xt/xtx or nothing
In a few months with good driver optimisation Intel should be good to go to be called the new budget king!
Just imagine how good the b750 and b770 are going to be I can't wait I own a 6700xt red devil love it been a great gpu but Intel is really ding the gaming community a solid with this gpu so I'm going to support them
6700 XT be like: At last, a worthy opponent.
The B580 is a great win for Intel, it also shows at the low end you need to pick your GPU based on the games you play. Almost never a clear winner when you compare 2 similar priced cards. Let's just hope Intel doesn't realize this competes with a 350 dollar card and since they are selling every card they can make...
The ray tracing performance is interesting
This is what it means by having more VRAM, it doesnt make a difference if the card itself has budget level specs, doesnt matter how much VRAM you add the budget cards will never make good utilization of thos extra VRAM in games to provide playable framerates. if for some reason you were to use all 12GB on any game, the card will simply provide unplayable frame that is under 60 for sure in which case you are better off dropping 2-4 gb vram and get almost double or even more framerates
12GB VRAM on budget cards are just a gimmick, 8GB is more than enough on entry level / budget tier cards, Mid tier minimum 12 is advisable but even then 16GB is not that required as mid tier ccards are not meant for ultra level gameplay . High tier cards altho should have 16GB VRAM (like 4070ti should have had 16GB but at least the super vairant have 16GB thats nice)
Alan Wake 2 is still like "F y'all"
Intel obviously has the potential to outperform the 6700xt here and maybe match something like the 6800 here outside of VRAM... Interesing
Intel markets this as a 1440p gpu. Will you be testing 1440p?
Interesting thing here is that in a lot of games the B580 uses almost half the power.
is 5700xt to 6700xt good upgrade?
I grabbed a brand new RX 6750 XT for £250 so I think I made the right choice looking at these numbers.
The TDP is simply amazing.
0:01 never gets old!
I hate Intel but they've been dunked on so much lately that I'm happy for them getting a win for once. Also I love more actual competition in the GPU space. Thats a win for everyone.
Just utilizig 50-60% power of 6700 xt in many games. This GPU def needs more driver level optimisation to be competetive.
I played CS2, Valorant, Apex Legends, Fortnite, etc ie competition shooters and the performance was bad.
Like it had many issues with untimely frame drops. It performed worse than 4060 at 1080p and at 1440p it kind f levelled up or still at times gave jitters and issues.
So Intel still has lot f work 2 do.
I hope the next line up ie B770,B780 would be learning lessons and should perform better.
From what I could source B780 will be a 350W TDP GPU.
16 GB GDDR6 memory.
256 bit bandwidth
3000 Mhz core frequency
28% more SMs than B580
Expects 20-30% more raster performance than B580
Target price of 350 USD.
Should be a 1440p beast and wud perform almost as good as an RTX 4070 with 16 GB memory.
I for 1 feel that will b a very good mid range GPU if they can pull it off as speculated.
The RTX 5070 will be costing close to 600 usd. So a B780 wud make insane sense
Look at power draw differences damn!
Not bad for an entry priced card with midrange performance.
Alchemist also got improved with the new driver
It's so good too see this gpu even rivals rx 6700 xt and actually beats it some games also intel raytracing is far better than Amd
Breaking news: AMD reacts to Arc
ARC B580 is hands down the best GPU on the planet according to its price
Does intel have a native aa solution? Like dlaa? Anything to get rid if the ugly ass taa
It will be really cool if we managed to get our hands on them though😂
HALF TDP? Huge win there
Where on earth you find so extreme oc version of 6700xt that consumes 50% more than it should irl?