Sony 11mm vs Viltrox 13mm - Photo & Video Test | Which one is good for vlogging?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
  • Good day , my friends!
    Today we are testing the SONY 11mm F1.8 and VILTROX 13mm F1.4 on the Sony ZV-E10. Which focal length is better for you?
    Sony 11mm F1.8 : amzn.to/498LduA
    Viltrox 13mm F1.4 : amzn.to/3FwcwBq
    🎞Time Stamp :
    0:00 Intro
    0:20 Four Main Differences
    1:24 Lens & Body View
    3:34 Photo Comparisons
    4:38 Bokeh Test
    4:54 Landscape Details
    6:15 Handheld Video
    7:58 Vlogging - Viltrox 13mm
    9:20 Vlogging - Sony 11mm
    11:00 Focusing Test
    12:20 Which one to choose?
    🎥 My Camera Gears :-
    Main Camera: amzn.to/3FthFKM
    Second Camera : amzn.to/405t3pu
    Wide Angle Lens: amzn.to/45LX8f0
    Kit Lens : amzn.to/46Il6co
    B-Roll Lens: amzn.to/46IE4zM
    Potrait Lens : amzn.to/47iWiYz
    Drone : amzn.to/46CnK3i
    SD Card: amzn.to/47293X2
    Favourite Gimbal: amzn.to/490XjGb
    DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!
    📨 CONTACT
    For business inquiries email me here: kojivisuals.work@gmail.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 34

  • @NickedOff
    @NickedOff 12 днів тому

    Very good comparison video! Appreciate the various video scenarios!

  • @timoohlsen
    @timoohlsen 5 місяців тому

    Great review, subscribed! 😊

  • @silverandblackentertainment
    @silverandblackentertainment 4 місяці тому +2

    Nice video man! I got the viltrox 13mm and the sigma 30mm for my zve10

  • @ridewithabdullah
    @ridewithabdullah Місяць тому

    Got the Sony 11mm F1.8 lens 8 months back, and it's been a game-changer for my travel vlogs. The F1.8 aperture excels in low light, while an ND filter helps maintain it in daylight. Love the results!

  • @canucklehead28
    @canucklehead28 6 місяців тому +1

    Great video! Keep it up!

  • @JirolBikes
    @JirolBikes 8 місяців тому

    great content

  • @robertgarica
    @robertgarica 4 місяці тому

    Superb content! How would you compare the viltrox 13 mm f1.4 against the sony 15 mm f1.4? Which provides better/sharper image quality? What is your preference and why?

  • @techrj3006
    @techrj3006 5 місяців тому

    Love your review bro

    • @kojivisuals
      @kojivisuals  5 місяців тому

      Very much appreciate it !

  • @educationforall5458
    @educationforall5458 6 місяців тому

    Would love to get viltrox

  • @SyafiqIkhwan
    @SyafiqIkhwan Місяць тому +1

    how far viltrox 13mm can zoom? is it same to zve10 kit lens?

  • @benderamyadventure
    @benderamyadventure 5 місяців тому

    thank for tutor and inform

  • @teresitorabaya6401
    @teresitorabaya6401 8 місяців тому +1

    The catalyst browse stabilization is awesome...better than a gimbal stabilization I think

    • @kojivisuals
      @kojivisuals  8 місяців тому +1

      Yeah the catalyst browse is awesome!
      But the gimbal shld be more smooth, i have tried to speed ramp both catalyst browse and gimbal footage; gimbal is more smooth.
      I think I nid to make a video abt zve10 stabilisation on gimbal vs active/catalyst browse stabilised

  • @osricvale
    @osricvale 2 місяці тому

    One question tho. I have sony fx30 and i dont have any lens right now. I am in between to get sigma 1.4 16mm plus tamron 28-75 g2 or i can get only this lens and call the day! I am looking for video shooting mostly(like ancient ruins, zoo, jungle, hiking, church, streets animals) and some photos here and there. I am also going to shoot talking head videos in door.
    I am also planning to use 4k 120fps option in Fx30 which has 1.5 more crop on top of apsc crop!
    I need to know 3 important aspects about these lenses!
    1- f1.8 vs f.1.4 How big of the difference especially for low light in door recordings with my fx30! I am bit worried about sensor being apsc and underperforms in low light. So should i really prioritize 1.4 over 1.8? I have done some research and find out 1.4 lets almost 2 times amount light than 1.8!
    2- I am really worried about distortion that sony 11mm has. I know we can use in camera corrections on fx30 body! But for me while shooting talking head i dont want my face to look weird because of extreme wide angle and distortion! Is it a problem with sony lens? Also while shooting some historical places i would not want to see curved lines!
    3- I am a bit worried about viltrox 13mm image quality! Sony looks way better, much punchier, much sharper and it is also a native lens for fx30! Also both lenses are same price in my country! Should i value that sony is native, have better focusing performance and same price with viltrox or should i go for viltrox and give up from that 2 mm but get brighter aperture and less distorted but less punchy and less sharp image quality with viltrox!
    Thanks for reply in advance!

  • @balkangetaway
    @balkangetaway 7 місяців тому

    The viltrox background while vlogging looks much better in the trees. On the 11 it looks very sharp and mechanical.

  • @andybelii
    @andybelii 8 місяців тому

    Ohhh! Good review, Man. Thank you. What you think about viltrox 75 mm? And sigma 16-50? Do you like zoom lens ?

    • @kojivisuals
      @kojivisuals  8 місяців тому +1

      Hi andy thanks! Viltrox 75mm is a superv portrait lens , but video is slow on autofocus.
      For sigma 18-50, i like this zoom lens.
      But, I just like F1.4 and F1.8 more 😋😋 Bokeh and Low Light is very nice

    • @andybelii
      @andybelii 8 місяців тому

      @@kojivisuals good , thank you… I think what to buy … full frame like Sony a7iv or Sony a7rv or just but lens for my zve10… I understand that ff cost more money, but…

    • @kojivisuals
      @kojivisuals  8 місяців тому +1

      @@andybelii Full frame is a really good, but the full frame lenses can be big and expensive. If you do service for commercial/wedding. It is good.
      If u do content creation, sigma 18-50 and zv-e10 is good enough. The image quality is great on apsc camera. We only lose out on Bokeh and Low Light compared to Full Frame.
      Also, we can always sell the body & lens at a good price to others. Sony camera has good value.

    • @andybelii
      @andybelii 8 місяців тому

      @@kojivisuals maybe, you know, if I want for future buy full frame )) what will be recommended a7rv or a7iv for video and photo for know… ? Or just buy a7c ii , but price like a7rv ))))

  • @Ntthaibk
    @Ntthaibk 26 днів тому

    bro why you not making a night footage to compare them. I really want to see what different 1.4 can make in low light situation

  • @NinPossible
    @NinPossible Місяць тому

    The Sony one is cheaper now (according to your links). 😳

  • @Weedeogram
    @Weedeogram 8 місяців тому +1

    11mm is super small & light. at F1.8, it's good enough for low light.

    • @kojivisuals
      @kojivisuals  8 місяців тому +1

      What abt the 13mm ? Do u like it?

    • @Weedeogram
      @Weedeogram 8 місяців тому

      @@kojivisuals yup, more advantage on low light.

  • @jimrocky
    @jimrocky 8 місяців тому

    I love Sony's lens design and build. Small & compact. Thing is, too pricey compared to 3rd party lenses.

    • @kojivisuals
      @kojivisuals  8 місяців тому

      The sony 11mm build is simple and rock solid, doesn’t collect much fingerprint too.
      Yup, the price of it… can buy full frame lense

  • @fredfred9758
    @fredfred9758 3 місяці тому

    The viltrox makes skin tones look horrible also noticeably warmer

    • @themarauder8006
      @themarauder8006 2 місяці тому

      You can still fix that in the photoshop.