UK Carrier Strike Group Suez Canal transit

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2021
  • HMS Queen Elizabeth and ships of the Carrier Strike Group transit the Suez Canal 6/7/21
    (Extended edit eversion)
    Also seen in this video: USS The Sullivans, RFA Fort Victoria, HMS Defender, RFA Tidespring and HMS Kent.
    Footage: MoD
    #CSG21 #HMSQueenElizabeth

КОМЕНТАРІ • 764

  • @Wanderer628
    @Wanderer628 3 роки тому +168

    The shot of all the warships going through the canal in a column was awesome.

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому +10

      Great shot. It reminds me of an old black and white war movie like sink the Bismarck
      😎👍

    • @frankmueller6522
      @frankmueller6522 2 роки тому +1

      Go forward, Great-Britain! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!

  • @geecee310
    @geecee310 3 роки тому +34

    Great to see this collective effort from across the UK, thanks to ship builders in Tyneside, Appledore, Birkenhead, Portsmouth, Glasgow and Rosyth.
    🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

  • @generaldreedle2801
    @generaldreedle2801 3 роки тому +73

    Reminds me of the famous Time magazine front cover screaming the Empire strikes back when the Task Force was heading to the Falklands.👍

  • @joenop3393
    @joenop3393 3 роки тому +107

    So Glad to see the British with such a Beautiful and Modern Carrier!

    • @simonbird1973
      @simonbird1973 3 роки тому +23

      @untilweeven Your name should be Uneducated, if you scaled up the the size of the UK’s economy & population, we wouldn’t be far behind you. You should be glad your closest ally is gearing up military again. I get the feeling you’ve never done a days service for your Country!!

    • @GoreTexTillEndEx
      @GoreTexTillEndEx 3 роки тому +13

      @@simonbird1973 These people are all the same; always gobbing off online about this and that because social media is the only place they can voice their opinions and their anonymity is protected.
      If they’d served any time in their countries’ armed forces (and especially if they worked with us) their opinion would be very different.

    • @andrewb9790
      @andrewb9790 3 роки тому +1

      Quick lads, they're filming this! Bring every plane we have and spread them out on the deck to try and make it look good! What do you mean thks is all we've got? Shh! Don't tell the Russians that this is the whole compliment of planes for the 2 carriers we've built!

    • @dynaztycrashdiet
      @dynaztycrashdiet 3 роки тому +7

      @untilweeven More like your comment is a joke. How old are you 10?

    • @lancebloke
      @lancebloke 3 роки тому +4

      @@andrewb9790 Well, apart from its not. But I'm guessing you just wanted to make a silly comment to somehow stick to em.

  • @dtothebtotheh
    @dtothebtotheh 3 роки тому +29

    Carrier Strike groups are a pretty amazing sight, this British one looks amazing💪🏼✌🏻

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 3 роки тому +7

      Of all the photos I have seen of the Queen Elizabeth and her F35’s the most notable are those showing the F35 coming over the stern of the carrier in the new landing system. Compared to the F18’s high speed landing and grabbing the arrester wire it is slow and short. Really amazing. People should have pride in our little country. First in all the aspects of carrier development. The first in all the following,
      carrier, carrier landing, angled flight deck, steam catapult, illuminated carrier landing system, vtol aircraft, the Harrier , forerunner of the F35, ramp take-off, carrier specifically constructed for the F35b, and finally the most beautiful and gracious landing system you could ask for.

    • @dtothebtotheh
      @dtothebtotheh 3 роки тому +4

      @@iemjgf yeah, the entire set up looks really impressive

    • @ramal5708
      @ramal5708 2 роки тому

      @@iemjgf F-35, the overprized, overextended fighter project? Its like stealthy, upgunned and better technology F-16 and Harrier Jump jet combined together

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 2 роки тому

      If you think a carrier strike group is impressive today , an American Task Force in World War Two would have blown your socks off. Four battleships, six Essex class fleet carriers, two or three light carriers several heavy cruisers, numerous destroyers and a fleet train stretching back for miles. That was one, and they had about three of them. The Japanese did not have a prayer. Yamamoto was perfectly correct ,the Japanese had indeed woke up a sleeping giant.

  • @PBurns-ng3gw
    @PBurns-ng3gw 3 роки тому +17

    Pulling security for this must've been a nightmare.

  • @rhodes1948
    @rhodes1948 3 роки тому +24

    Stunning display of power

    • @arealbobbydazzler2520
      @arealbobbydazzler2520 3 роки тому +2

      We'll I wouldn't want it rolling up in my back yard 😮

    • @Richard-yp1dd
      @Richard-yp1dd 3 роки тому

      Perhaps, or not. China have 10x more ships than us, and produce 5x as many ships as the US Navy per year.

    • @liondecka9062
      @liondecka9062 3 роки тому +2

      @@Richard-yp1dd perhaps or not 🤣👎

    • @mattcraven7188
      @mattcraven7188 3 роки тому +8

      @@Richard-yp1dd China go for quantity over quality, plus most of there navy is poorly trained.

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому +8

      @@mattcraven7188 yep. The Chinese are to scared to sail out of their own green waters, while these badboys are sailing around the world having a right old jolly 🇺🇲🇬🇧🇳🇱

  • @sfoeric
    @sfoeric 3 роки тому +41

    Brilliant stuff! So glad the US has a role to play in HMS Queen Elizabeth’s CSG.

    • @355PH
      @355PH 3 роки тому +2

      USA saved us in 1944. Working together with them now also makes the UK 🇬🇧 happy and safe 🙏🙏😊🤝💪

    • @oddmodbod2103
      @oddmodbod2103 3 роки тому +1

      We can only supply an half strength squadron (617) ...So QE has US F35 ...Embarrassing..
      Sailing though the Med 3 and 11 squadron had to fly top cover using Typhoons out of Coningsby..
      For all the flag waiving 🇬🇧..Monstrous Defence Cuts like never seen are killing our Armed Forces..😡

    • @simonbird1973
      @simonbird1973 3 роки тому +5

      @@355PH Someone needs a lesson in history. That said the UK will always appreciate the sacrifice the United States of America made in WW2 along with countless other Nations including the USSR & the British Empire to mention a few. So yeah, thanks 😂

    • @355PH
      @355PH 3 роки тому +1

      @Astolfo Desu - Still very proud to serve with our brothers from the USA 🇺🇸🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧💪💪💪

    • @snick260
      @snick260 3 роки тому +2

      @@355PH usa didn't save the UK haha 😆

  • @johnreid4056
    @johnreid4056 3 роки тому +7

    Fantastic i was on HMS Fearless last time went through its awsome

  • @ReynaxisSolutions
    @ReynaxisSolutions 3 роки тому +9

    So glad to see a Royal Navy carrier strike group after the Falklands War.

    • @nzer57
      @nzer57 3 роки тому

      It's a death trap full stop. There's no where on this planet you can hide and you can bet your left nut that every strike group would be dead in the water within 24hrs of a major conflageration.

    • @ReynaxisSolutions
      @ReynaxisSolutions 2 роки тому

      @ElChivo 105 i heard they have lost their might at sea before so it's nice to see them back.

  • @emeraldcolorsky1194
    @emeraldcolorsky1194 2 роки тому +3

    amazing ! Love from S.Korea.

  • @tarqscam8491
    @tarqscam8491 3 роки тому +3

    Awesome footage.

  • @GBLynden
    @GBLynden 3 роки тому +4

    So cool! 👊🏻💥👊🏻

  • @Vizzo69s
    @Vizzo69s 3 роки тому

    Incredible!

  • @pauljohnson1664
    @pauljohnson1664 3 роки тому +26

    It feels so good to be British right now.

    • @malahammer
      @malahammer 3 роки тому +6

      Brexit? :)

    • @pauljohnson1664
      @pauljohnson1664 3 роки тому +5

      @@malahammer And the future
      ua-cam.com/video/d_AfLkQKPb0/v-deo.html

    • @axle.australian.patriot
      @axle.australian.patriot 3 роки тому +4

      Welcome back to the real western world kin 🙏

    • @malahammer
      @malahammer 3 роки тому

      @@pauljohnson1664 good luck with that....Australia has already screwed the UK with a trade deal!

    • @tommarshall1660
      @tommarshall1660 3 роки тому +1

      Boris Johnston and the tory sleaze???

  • @wibb20000
    @wibb20000 3 роки тому +1

    The music is great. Proud to be 🇬🇧🇬🇧 great to see this new aircraft carrier

    • @ramal5708
      @ramal5708 2 роки тому

      Gerald R Ford enters the chat

    • @wibb20000
      @wibb20000 2 роки тому

      @@ramal5708 and?

    • @ramal5708
      @ramal5708 2 роки тому

      Gerald R Ford>this carrier

    • @wibb20000
      @wibb20000 2 роки тому

      @@ramal5708 yeah and? When did I ever compare the two together?

  • @markmcloughlin3843
    @markmcloughlin3843 3 роки тому +1

    What a beautiful ship

  • @bebeguygoz6840
    @bebeguygoz6840 3 роки тому +4

    No future accusation EVERGREEN..!!
    Good play and music.

  • @JCStaling
    @JCStaling 3 роки тому +1

    That was cool.

  • @KillingDeadThings
    @KillingDeadThings 3 роки тому +6

    Awesomeness.

  • @sarribel
    @sarribel 3 роки тому +18

    Spectacular. Mighty procession across the mighty land of Pharaohs. Britain is back East of Aden

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 3 роки тому

      For what reason? How about showing the flag in Canada, Australia and New Zealand, our Commonwealth brothers and firm allies.

    • @ramal5708
      @ramal5708 2 роки тому

      Only Britain? You forgot the Arleigh Burke class destroyer in the convoy as well, plus other commonwealth ships and personel as well.

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 2 роки тому

      @@ramal5708 I am trying to find where I said “only Britain”.
      Can you help me please, by writing the sentence.

    • @ramal5708
      @ramal5708 2 роки тому

      @@iemjgf" Britain is back in Aden", sorry I meant from the main comment

  • @lewis211
    @lewis211 3 роки тому +31

    Defenders of democracy, Britain is on its way back! 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇨🇦🇳🇿🇦🇺

    • @JCStaling
      @JCStaling 3 роки тому +11

      It seems the Anglophone nations are the last defenders of Western Civilisation.

    • @MBO84
      @MBO84 3 роки тому +6

      Yes, the rest of Europe appear to have given up. No surprises there

    • @gelirgecer9395
      @gelirgecer9395 3 роки тому +2

      @@JCStaling thats maybe truth but they wiped out civilisations and stole lands

    • @ultraman5168
      @ultraman5168 3 роки тому +3

      Many of the Asian nations are now more fervent guardians of freedom than much if the EU. Sad to see, but I hope it can be changed. The UK leads by example for a Europe which needs to recapture it's individuality and purpose.

    • @ultraman5168
      @ultraman5168 3 роки тому +5

      @@gelirgecer9395 same song and dance for all nations throughout history. The 'imperialist' western nations were just more successful at it.
      And democratic nations have moved past that into an era of cooperation, mutual respect, and beneficence. It's not we that still spread chaos and oppression through the world. We're the only nations making any sort of attempt to stem the tide.

  • @deanhankio6304
    @deanhankio6304 3 роки тому +27

    There is a hidden underwater mine somewhere. Denmark has nothing to do with that.

    • @simonhulmesh
      @simonhulmesh 3 роки тому +3

      Then it's a good job CSG21 brought a minesweeper with it!

    • @Autofleet4429
      @Autofleet4429 3 роки тому +5

      The Royal Navy has has a whole taskforce of mine warfare vessels in the middle east that they can if necessary call upon.

    • @gamedayswede
      @gamedayswede 3 роки тому +3

      @@Autofleet4429 I think he was ironic

    • @anthony49812
      @anthony49812 3 роки тому +4

      Everyone thats into football will get your joke mate 😄👍

    • @ITER345
      @ITER345 3 роки тому

      Hope not as its an international carrier group!

  • @KindaGross
    @KindaGross 3 роки тому +4

    track goes hard

  • @dzulkafleysamad4980
    @dzulkafleysamad4980 3 роки тому

    Please do video coverage when its passing through straits of malacca n its maritim exercise with the FPDA forces.

  • @TofuBoi_
    @TofuBoi_ 3 роки тому +20

    I would assume during wartime, this canal would be a death trap.

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah. Think the last time, it was Israel at war with surrounding counties. The Suez got mined to FUUK. Took 8yrears before it was made safe again

    • @donjones4719
      @donjones4719 3 роки тому +4

      That's why in WW 1 and 2 the Brits had large forces stationed in Egypt, and why they were so reluctant to give full independence to Egypt for so long.

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 3 роки тому +1

      Most of the desert army’s supplies came through the canal after a long voyage round the Cape. For the Empire it was one of its most important links.

    • @nzer57
      @nzer57 3 роки тому +1

      It's a death trap full stop. There's no where on this planet you can hide and you can bet your left nut that every strike group would be dead in the water within 24hrs of a major conflageration.

  • @kristianmolloy8622
    @kristianmolloy8622 3 роки тому +1

    that music as QE passes damn i want that music

  • @ykdickybill
    @ykdickybill 3 роки тому +2

    🇬🇧🎵’ When I was a lad I served a term………I wrote those writs with a hand so free that now I am the ruler of the Queens Navy ! ‘🇬🇧

  • @kostasangisoulaki912
    @kostasangisoulaki912 3 роки тому

    Nice ski ramp

  • @teacherwayne6680
    @teacherwayne6680 3 роки тому

    impressive

  • @goldenboy1803
    @goldenboy1803 3 роки тому +4

    Cant wait for the Tempest

    • @tsloo1620
      @tsloo1620 3 роки тому

      Yeah bro

    • @wibb20000
      @wibb20000 3 роки тому

      @@tsloo1620 when is it coming?

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 2 роки тому +1

      You had better hope that it does not get cancelled. Remember the TRS2. In design and function, Years ahead of its time. British design at its best . We could have abolished that feudal monstrosity, the Lords, and had a lovely plane.

  • @hishonoursirdrinksalot1916
    @hishonoursirdrinksalot1916 2 роки тому +2

    My OCD with the antenna's our of sync is making my teeth itch but seeing those ships......

  • @AndyH2023.
    @AndyH2023. 3 роки тому +11

    Come and have a go if you think your big enough 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 glad to see us back!

    • @davetrousers
      @davetrousers 3 роки тому

      You're

    • @AndyH2023.
      @AndyH2023. 3 роки тому +2

      @@davetrousers didn’t ask for you to correct my spelling 👍🏼

    • @355PH
      @355PH 3 роки тому +2

      👍😂😂😂

    • @355PH
      @355PH 3 роки тому +2

      @@davetrousers - You tool!

    • @Wild-Storm
      @Wild-Storm 3 роки тому

      It depends if you can defend when the time comes. Hope you have you arm buoy in your pants!

  • @Asethet
    @Asethet 3 роки тому +1

    Someone in supply was very confused about the requisition form for 4 pallets of Marlboro cigarettes, but there are a lot of ships in a Strike Group and they all need to get through the canal.

  • @chrismitchell7801
    @chrismitchell7801 2 роки тому +1

    Silly question probably, but would an accompanying sub go through too?

  • @kranson8514
    @kranson8514 3 роки тому +27

    I wounder if our forces now how genuinely proud we are of them, honoured we are 😉

    • @aerohk
      @aerohk 3 роки тому +2

      All those F-35 on the deck are American jets, replaced the British made Harrier. Not very proud.

    • @kranson8514
      @kranson8514 3 роки тому +1

      @@aerohkWe'll get them or the next generation so don't worry, the equipment isn't what make the our forces the men and wemon who serve most definitely do though.

    • @randombritishguy2686
      @randombritishguy2686 2 роки тому +1

      @@aerohk just under half the f 35s are british, but what's wrong with letting the yanks tag along with thier f35s considering how long it take to make and ship the damn things.

  • @ramal5708
    @ramal5708 2 роки тому +1

    Classic show of force transit

  • @jasonfernee2401
    @jasonfernee2401 3 роки тому +3

    Can anyone explain why HMS Queen Elizabeth wasn't flying the White Ensign? Great footage.

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 3 роки тому

      I am not quite sure, but I think it has something to do with travelling through Egyptian territory.

  • @MrBBBLADY
    @MrBBBLADY 3 роки тому +2

    👍👍👍

  • @PBurns-ng3gw
    @PBurns-ng3gw 3 роки тому +2

    Absolutely beautiful ship. Feels like the Royal Navy's back in its element.
    (Not that they were ever out of their element, mind. Respect & love from across the pond.)

  • @scabthecat
    @scabthecat 3 роки тому +13

    Great music.

    • @robertcook2572
      @robertcook2572 3 роки тому +1

      Wasn't it, though?

    • @nosaltadded2530
      @nosaltadded2530 3 роки тому +1

      That was a pretty good choice.

    • @danep8553
      @danep8553 3 роки тому

      Weird dark techno. Strange but quite enticing.

  • @joking7081
    @joking7081 3 роки тому +3

    Good to see a UK naval presence moving towards to the south-east Asia area. CCP China needs to know that the freedom loving countries of the world will not put up with their bully tactics. Countries such as Australia has supported the UK through 2 world wars. Its good to see the UK now standing up for its friends and allied countries.

    • @gbafongbafon
      @gbafongbafon 3 роки тому

      Euro trash compared to us strike group its a joke

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому +2

      @@gbafongbafon America are part of this NATO fleet, idiot

  • @baginatora
    @baginatora 3 роки тому

    Are they headed to Italy?

  • @bestamerica
    @bestamerica 2 роки тому +1

    '
    honor and salute to UK royal navy services

  • @MrBobconner1952
    @MrBobconner1952 3 роки тому

    Why are the decks so empty?

  • @anthonyscott609
    @anthonyscott609 2 роки тому

    What is worth investing in CRYPTOCURRENCY OR GOLD?

  • @MBO84
    @MBO84 3 роки тому +17

    🇬🇧 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇦🇺 🇳🇿

    • @frankmueller6522
      @frankmueller6522 2 роки тому +1

      Best wishes from Germany to our friends and allies from the English speaking countries! But you have forgotten Ireland!

  • @DanM012324
    @DanM012324 3 роки тому

    Where does the submarine escort go? the canal isn't deep enough for it to stay submerged so does it peel off and do something else while another sub is waiting on the other side of the canal and pickup escort duties?

    • @madmanjoe1002
      @madmanjoe1002 3 роки тому +1

      It will already be on the other side. One for the Mediterranean, one for the other side?

    • @shuki1
      @shuki1 2 роки тому

      Submarines are required to transit the canal on the surface and do once in a while. Sometimes like would be in a case like this where a whole force is travelling together and sometimes as a show of force to enemies in the relevant places.

  • @garykb1
    @garykb1 3 роки тому

    It’s coming home.

  • @Nordle69
    @Nordle69 3 роки тому

    very nice but how much did it cost to send them all down the canal?

  • @simonjackson7269
    @simonjackson7269 3 роки тому +1

    They won't get stuck!!

  • @Nordle69
    @Nordle69 3 роки тому

    i believe you have to have a pilot on board to run the canal, would a war ship allow a foreign pilot on board?

    • @Richy076
      @Richy076 2 роки тому

      I was thinking that exact thing

  • @billkingston4402
    @billkingston4402 3 роки тому +10

    Mean machine, I was sad when the Ark Royal was retired, the F35 is something else

    • @wilsonedwards8189
      @wilsonedwards8189 3 роки тому +1

      Best to have next level power projection. There are probably a lot of relieved Argentinian soldiers knowing their govt won't try anything again soon.

    • @ramal5708
      @ramal5708 2 роки тому

      @@wilsonedwards8189 why does Argentina have to do with it?

    • @ramal5708
      @ramal5708 2 роки тому

      F-35 is an upgunned, with new tech, F-16 and Harrier Jump jet combined with stealth technology, not to mention the hourly flying cost and maintenance cost

    • @wilsonedwards8189
      @wilsonedwards8189 2 роки тому

      @@ramal5708 google "argentina UK Falklands war". They've had a dispute for centuries that resulted in a war in 1982. It was close and some argue that the only reason the UK succeeded then was the US intervened through channels to guarantee UK would win. UK was in recession at the time and had undergone military cuts and was slightly vulnerable. The UK controlling the Falklands means they will have a large amount of needed resources, incl natural gas and oil. Being able to project power with the Queen Elizabeth means essentially no nation other than US or China can effectively challenge the UK navy(and arguably the Chinese might have a hard time against two UK carriers). I'm a former US soldier who spoke with a British commando who fought there.

    • @ramal5708
      @ramal5708 2 роки тому

      @@wilsonedwards8189 I know about Falklands fiasco but why would Argentina try to do anything with rhe British? They have probably much better things to do than challenging the British again

  • @stepheno21
    @stepheno21 3 роки тому

    Can i ask, would a Suez Canal pilot jump on board and steer the QE while transiting the Canal or does this not apply to military vessels?

    • @Autofleet4429
      @Autofleet4429 3 роки тому +5

      If I remember correctly pilots don't direct military vessels directly but rather give the best advice of steering the vessel to the navigation officer/officer who has conduct of the ship instead.

    • @jamesevans938
      @jamesevans938 3 роки тому +2

      I would guess so civilians are often abroad the ship and I guess any secretive/ important to national security stuff is hidden and the pilot would be on the bridge and only exit the bridge to leave the ship

    • @stepheno21
      @stepheno21 3 роки тому

      @@jamesevans938 ​ Thanks for the reply. I guess the blockage from the ever given has got me curious about whether it would be allowed. But It would make since that if Civilians are on board working that they could.

    • @stepheno21
      @stepheno21 3 роки тому +1

      @@Autofleet4429 Thanks for the reply back. Being a rather green in the Naval world. I thought it may have been a silly question lol. Either way whether the ship crew or the canal pilots are in control. Its impressive to see nonetheless.

    • @sergarlantyrell7847
      @sergarlantyrell7847 3 роки тому

      @@Autofleet4429 Yes, I believe so. Asside from putting the fate of a nations's national security assets in the hands of another nation's civilian pilot, which is just not going to happen... military vessels are in general sufficiently dissimilar from the kind of cargo & passenger vessels that pilots are used to, so they would be more likely to crash than just directing the practiced helmsman.

  • @5taunch
    @5taunch 3 роки тому +1

    The man dem are here 🇬🇧🇺🇸

  • @jamesstone7283
    @jamesstone7283 3 роки тому +1

    Get'em boys

  • @johnfoster3286
    @johnfoster3286 3 роки тому

    Its a UK Royal Navy ship but does it still have to have an egyptian pilot?

    • @gamedayswede
      @gamedayswede 3 роки тому +1

      Yes

    • @franciscruickshank8794
      @franciscruickshank8794 3 роки тому

      of course it got an egyptian pilot! ppathetic lot the rn. have to get yanks to crew the ships, suppose the orders come from pentagon! little britain the us is using you in the coming war with china! but you have to folloow orders .SAOR ALBA

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 2 роки тому

      All ships military or civil must carry a certificated Egyptian pilot. He is there to guide and advise the captain on navigating the waters of the canal and lakes.

  • @sushiromifune7096
    @sushiromifune7096 3 роки тому

    Reminds me of the HMS Prince of Wales coming to Asia...

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому

      Does It also remind you of the thousands of other ships sunk on all sides during world war 2?

  • @alexandercarder2281
    @alexandercarder2281 3 роки тому

    It feels very ominous this does.

  • @jonesy66691
    @jonesy66691 3 роки тому

    What is with the battlefield music, are you going to war or something?

  • @deanstephens2876
    @deanstephens2876 3 роки тому +1

    Would the submarine go round. And not through the Suez canal.?

    • @eyesofisabelofficial
      @eyesofisabelofficial 3 роки тому +1

      No the sub had gone through first.

    • @deanstephens2876
      @deanstephens2876 3 роки тому

      @@eyesofisabelofficial Really.
      Wow thanks for the reply, I would of thought it would of gone round. I didn't know that subs used the Suez or the Panama canal.

  • @jonathanwheeler4767
    @jonathanwheeler4767 3 роки тому +7

    Strange not a single person working on deck ?

    • @Karedu.
      @Karedu. 3 роки тому

      Vacation my budy

  • @gnolan4281
    @gnolan4281 2 роки тому +1

    The local Egyptians must be jaded and indifferent to such a spectacle. Just another day at the office for them? If it was me I'd be saying shiver me timbers WTF is THAT?!

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 2 роки тому +1

      We were going from Port Suez to Port Said and into the Med. On the top section nearest to Port Said, on the left bank on a couple of occasions they turned round, bent over and showed their arses.

    • @gnolan4281
      @gnolan4281 2 роки тому

      @@iemjgf Yikes! I was told they're not too keen on toilet tissue. Tennis anyone?

  • @viky2786
    @viky2786 3 роки тому

    One question if vertical landing failed in f35 then what next?

    • @jaybatsford
      @jaybatsford 3 роки тому

      I would imagine that protocols are firmly in place seeing as we've been using VTOL aircraft for our carriers since the 80s.

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому

      F35BS have 3 ways of landing

  • @wilsonedwards8189
    @wilsonedwards8189 3 роки тому

    Those are F-35s? They are getting around. Maybe doing a world tour as a ocean test? How many ships in that group?

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому +1

      Something like 12 ships. A massive fleet including America and the Netherlands. Will also be joined by Australian and Japanese warships

    • @haihengh
      @haihengh 2 роки тому

      @@noodles169 I think they maybe help Japan to ramp up Izumo F35 operation training too as Izumo just complete their modification for F35.

  • @greathorton
    @greathorton 3 роки тому

    This film was uploaded in 6 hours ago when I am watching. Where is her actual location? Asia is waiting for her.

  • @NGaugeVideo
    @NGaugeVideo 3 роки тому +9

    Don't get stuck like the Evergreen😂

  • @fredericdelmedico5251
    @fredericdelmedico5251 3 роки тому

    where is the royal air force ?

  • @oinamronenzaaa4923
    @oinamronenzaaa4923 2 роки тому +1

    Are they again coming to loot?

    • @Richy076
      @Richy076 2 роки тому

      Now you have mentioned it I wouldn't mind
      (This is a joke)

  • @Gripenace
    @Gripenace 3 роки тому +5

    Respect! There should be a submarine or two within this mission, often not to be confirmed ;)..... how do they pass?

    • @G1NZOU
      @G1NZOU 3 роки тому +5

      There is confirmed to be one Astute class within CSG21, though I don't believe it's confirmed which one, it probably passes while surfaced as the Suez draft is something like 66ft and the Astute draft is 33ft, so not a whole lot of room to transit while submerged.

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому +1

      Put them in the hanger deck 👍

    • @turbine6338
      @turbine6338 3 роки тому

      During Night hours is the best way for subs, that is if the subs are waiting in the Indian Ocean.

    • @georgebarnes8163
      @georgebarnes8163 3 роки тому +1

      @@G1NZOU Nuclear powered vessels are not permitted to use the Suez canal.

    • @curioussand1339
      @curioussand1339 3 роки тому +3

      Submerged and hidden between two warships

  • @claudiopizzale4841
    @claudiopizzale4841 3 роки тому

    Why do I instantly think of the BF4 campaign?

  • @suburbia2050
    @suburbia2050 2 роки тому +1

    The most powerful and hi tech bit isn't even in view... The Astute class attack submarine

  • @Radictor44
    @Radictor44 3 роки тому +9

    The British are coming!!! The British are coming!!!! (with some friends :D )

    • @neil5307
      @neil5307 3 роки тому

      The original call was: 'the regulars are coming'..... both sides were British, which is part of the reason the British Army stopped fighting; no stomach for war against British Colonists back on the Houses of Parliament. And no financial benefit owning non tax paying Colonies which didn't produce much in the way of exportable crops.

    • @JCStaling
      @JCStaling 3 роки тому

      @@neil5307 I thought it was "The Redcoats are coming!" Which shows that the American colonists, even by 1775, thought of themselves as separate from the British.

    • @neil5307
      @neil5307 3 роки тому

      @@JCStaling we can agree to differ. I think slight American revisionism paints it as a war won by heroic farmers against a professional army, but really it was Lafayette and his 15000 French soldiers who helped. There was cheering I the Houses of Parliament when the decision was made to stop fighting fellow Brits, and focus on fighting the French in France rather than a proxy war in an ultimately indefensible territory.

    • @JCStaling
      @JCStaling 3 роки тому

      @@neil5307 Differ on this we must, but as an American, and a former US Marine the "bonds of affection" between the US and the UK have never been stronger since WW2.

    • @neil5307
      @neil5307 3 роки тому

      @@JCStaling Yes we can agree on that, well said.. .cheers

  • @Madenity
    @Madenity 3 роки тому

    0:02 What jet is that

  • @ajwest3081
    @ajwest3081 3 роки тому +1

    Do the F35 cockpits not degrade in the hot sun?

    • @joyceycousteau
      @joyceycousteau 3 роки тому +3

      Cockpit canopy has multiple filters. So not really.

    • @ajwest3081
      @ajwest3081 3 роки тому

      @@joyceycousteau still I’m surprised they leave them out in full on sun in that part of the world

    • @axle.australian.patriot
      @axle.australian.patriot 3 роки тому +2

      @@ajwest3081 I think they are subject to far more stresses in the air and at altitude then they would be sitting in the sun on the deck :)

    • @ThatCarGuy
      @ThatCarGuy 3 роки тому +2

      As someone else said they have special UV filters on them as when you are above the clouds the sun is much brighter, hence why the helmet visors are tinted with UV filters as well. So while the sun baking on them will degrade them, it's such a slow process it's negligible.

  • @dsdy1205
    @dsdy1205 3 роки тому +2

    I guess we should be glad they didn't get stuck as well

    • @nosaltadded2530
      @nosaltadded2530 3 роки тому

      Warships are smaller than container ships with considerably more powerful engines and faster response times.

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 3 роки тому

      @@nosaltadded2530 Don't think the QE is that much smaller in this case

    • @nosaltadded2530
      @nosaltadded2530 3 роки тому

      @@dsdy1205 HMS Queen Elizabeth. Length: 920'. Beam: 128'. Draft: 36'. Displacement 65,000 tons. Installed power: 46 MW total. Speed: 32 knots. Ever Given: Length: 1,312'. Beam: 192' 11". Draft: 47' 7" to a maximum of 52' 6". Displacement" 220,940 Gross tons. Installed power: 59,300 kW. Speed: 22.8 knots. Any questions?

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 3 роки тому +1

      @@nosaltadded2530 Yeah. Why so snide?

    • @nosaltadded2530
      @nosaltadded2530 3 роки тому

      @@dsdy1205 Snide?

  • @mrwideboy
    @mrwideboy 3 роки тому

    Do do we have to pay for the transit considering the British paid and built it

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому

      Think all nations that use the Suez, pay towards the upkeep, and security of the passage

    • @ahmadel-zebedy
      @ahmadel-zebedy 3 роки тому

      You mean to paid but used slaved labor which ended up killing 150 thousand Egyptian

    • @mrwideboy
      @mrwideboy 3 роки тому

      @@ahmadel-zebedythe British was the first country in the world abolish slavery in 1833 the suez canal was built in1859. The arab muslim world still slaves,how do you think dubai is being built or the 2022 fifa world cup? The Islamic state still went around slaving people and women as sex slaves, because its in the quran. Look ar your own backyard

    • @ahmadel-zebedy
      @ahmadel-zebedy 3 роки тому

      @@mrwideboy okay so you again basically ran away from the fact that 150 thousand Egyptian died from poor working conditions and slavery by the Brits abolishing the rule didn't really matter if you don't apply them these people were forced to do it somewhere like prison camps that's beside the colonisation which ended up with thousands dies so guess what these dead people didn't benefit from your so called anti slavery rules lol

    • @ahmadel-zebedy
      @ahmadel-zebedy 3 роки тому

      @@mrwideboy second thing as I said they were FORCED to do it...mean while FIFA world cup is in Qatar not Dubai second thing these people come to these arab countries on there own will and sign up contracts on there own will nobody forced them to do.it

  • @Moai_454
    @Moai_454 2 роки тому

    Good thing i didn’t get stuck

  • @malahammer
    @malahammer 3 роки тому +1

    Must not get stuck....Must not get stuck....Must not get stuck...................

    • @JCStaling
      @JCStaling 3 роки тому +1

      Don't even think about it.

  • @paulikzz17
    @paulikzz17 2 роки тому

    What a flex

  • @brentsummers7377
    @brentsummers7377 3 роки тому +1

    Nice day to shoot some footage from a F35 says a pilot. MOD accountant says: 'Can we sell the footage to some tv channels and get at least US 44,000, to break even on costs?'

  • @PhilbyFavourites
    @PhilbyFavourites 3 роки тому

    It’s 1930 (BST not Zulu) on Sunday night, yes that special night.
    I hope the WAFUs are in the hangar deck watching the match. If so - remember TARANTO………
    To all the assorted, Jocks, Taffs and Paddies - we love you all. Get in there and cheer on your neighbours 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
    (Post match note: Bugger……… ah well, 55 years of hurt and Jules Rimet still gleaming - albeit in need of a bloody good polish by now. Still incredibly proud to be English and a Brit)

  • @josephkilfeather4047
    @josephkilfeather4047 2 роки тому +1

    Interesting the jets are USMC and the Helicopter is Royal Navy on a British Aircraft Carrier.

    • @shuki1
      @shuki1 2 роки тому

      I noticed that also. Curious what the reason is.

    • @Benjd0
      @Benjd0 2 роки тому +1

      It's a mixture at the minute, the UK have some F-35 on board and the USMC also do. The UK haven't received their full order of F-35 yet (Even with its full planned complement, technically they could fit a lot more aircraft) so as they plan on working closely with these new carriers they've used this opportunity to work together.

  • @TranceJedi
    @TranceJedi 3 роки тому

    Looking forward to it sinking !

  • @madmattius
    @madmattius 3 роки тому

    How many F35's can she take captain! Looks like perhaps 20ish max, which is enough. Quite a large deck for a 65k tonne carrier.

    • @FireAngelOfLondon
      @FireAngelOfLondon 3 роки тому +1

      The Royal Navy's web site says 24 fighters normally, 36 in surge mode. This is in addition to some helicopters to provide AWACS and electronic warfare capabilities. Total maximum aircraft complement is officially 40, same source. This is purely speculation but I believe the highly competent Royal Navy could cram in roughly 50 aircraft total and make it work if they were pressed, more would just make the air wing unsafe to operate. Unless you see a link to an official source you can dismiss any figure above 40 as unofficial speculation.

    • @randombritishguy2686
      @randombritishguy2686 2 роки тому

      In a real life fully arm situation she would carry 24 fighters and 36 helicopters.

    • @FireAngelOfLondon
      @FireAngelOfLondon 2 роки тому

      @Zuul Gatekeeper That is a commercial web site, a news organisation of dubious quality NOT the official site of ANY military organisation. THE FIGURES I QUOTED CAME FROM THE ROYAL NAVY'S SITE. The figure of 70 is rubbish and tells you that that site should be regarded as a waste of reading time.

  • @josephlezano7691
    @josephlezano7691 3 роки тому

    Wonderful video image of HMS Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier passing through the Suez Canal and escorting Ship's .
    There has been a comment with an accompanying photograph on Twitter that HMS Queen Elizabeth got stuck there .
    The image includes , what is said is the Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier being towed by the French Aircraft Carrier , Charles De Gaule . It is suggested by someone else that the image is Photo-Shopped .
    How much truth is there in this ? Did HMS Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier Hull get stuck in the Suez Canal ?
    With Best Wishes.
    British Gibraltar UK Overseas Territory 🇬🇧.

    • @timur_glazkov
      @timur_glazkov 3 роки тому +3

      They're just photoshop for fun and giggles, all is fine!

    • @photoisca7386
      @photoisca7386 3 роки тому

      Your gullibility threshold is set too high. Try reducing it or subscribe to "A Different Bias" as Davy Lynch does.

    • @ahab9712
      @ahab9712 3 роки тому +2

      No it didnt, its just banter between us and the french. We photohop their carrier aswell so jokes all round

    • @georgebarnes8163
      @georgebarnes8163 3 роки тому +1

      The French carrier is not permitted in the Suez canal.

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому +2

      Come on bro. You can't be that gullible surely. If anything Elizabeth would be towing the French carrier

  • @andimuhjafar
    @andimuhjafar 3 роки тому

    The world :
    The UK : send carrier strike!

  • @fubarmofo6969
    @fubarmofo6969 2 роки тому

    Uk ship with american made jets onboard a sight of power

  • @dtothebtotheh
    @dtothebtotheh 3 роки тому +1

    Where is this group headed? South China Sea?

    • @JCStaling
      @JCStaling 3 роки тому

      Have you been living under a rock without a phone?

    • @dtothebtotheh
      @dtothebtotheh 3 роки тому

      Well yeah, I’ve pulled my back, I’ve been pretty much disabled for the last three weeks , thanks

    • @JCStaling
      @JCStaling 3 роки тому

      @@dtothebtotheh I didn't mean to be cruel. Just had a bad day is all.

    • @dtothebtotheh
      @dtothebtotheh 3 роки тому

      @@JCStaling no harm mate

    • @axle.australian.patriot
      @axle.australian.patriot 3 роки тому +2

      Indo-Pacific region, we don't don't encourage them by calling it the SCS.

  • @paxster76
    @paxster76 3 роки тому +3

    People on the Suez must be like, "some sh!ts about to go down.."

  • @magnusqwerty
    @magnusqwerty 2 роки тому

    Why the music 🎶🐟👅🙈?

  • @jackiecoughlan2336
    @jackiecoughlan2336 3 роки тому

    What a fucking ship

  • @planerunner4020
    @planerunner4020 2 роки тому

    wait wtf? i thought egypt didnt allow any navy ship?

  • @iemjgf
    @iemjgf 3 роки тому

    The Queen Elizabeth’s maiden operation is going great. They are now through Suez and on their way south through the Red Sea and across the Indian Ocean. Watching the photos of going through the canal brings back memories. Please keep the operation cool by not waving the flag at the Chinese. There is no reason at all to upset them . I have sailed those waters and China can be given a wide berth.

    • @JCStaling
      @JCStaling 3 роки тому +2

      CSG21 is not due to enter Pacific waters until August, I believe. And no, China should NOT be given "a wide berth". They are the ones trampling all over International Law and must be taught a lesson.

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 3 роки тому

      @@JCStaling who is China trampling all over and what does that mean.? Remember this is not a game of throwing dolls out of prams. Somebody presses the wrong button here and we are all in the shit. We have no interests in South East Asia any more and we should keep away from trouble. There are plenty of others in the region that can upset China i.e., US, Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Singapore and Vietnam.

    • @JCStaling
      @JCStaling 3 роки тому +2

      @@iemjgf Is there not an interest in the UK for peace and stability in the World? Especially when the current Chinese president cosplays the psychopathic mass-murderer Mao, whom even the Russian Soviets called crazy? Peace through Strength, my dear Sir.

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 3 роки тому

      @@JCStaling I am still asking, where are all these Chinese atrocities being carried out?
      Your words “China should be taught a lesson”. I agree with your peace through strength but not peace through provocation, that could lead to big trouble. I watched a lecture by an American professor at Berkeley on nuclear warfare. He chose a small confrontation between Pakistan and India, The resulting smoke and nuclear debris rising into the atmosphere would cause the sky to darken,many crops to fail and 2 billion deaths from starvation. Just as a matter of interest, which war was yours?

    • @axle.australian.patriot
      @axle.australian.patriot 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah nah, the whole point of the CSG21 coming on an Indo-Pacific tour is to make a point to the Chinese government. Have we forgot what happened to Hong Kong already? Next is Taiwan and some strategic island nations, then Japan, then Australia.. by then it will well and truly be a global sh|t show with everyone throwing their balls into the ring.

  • @mayajrj
    @mayajrj 3 роки тому

    Why are no Union Jacks flying here?

    • @bartley7953
      @bartley7953 3 роки тому

      Its not in port ?

    • @mayajrj
      @mayajrj 3 роки тому

      @@bartley7953 NO they fly them at the back under sail and forward when in port. so that as they enter harbour people can see friend (see when at anchor in home port. Just wondered if it was protocol in the Suez Canal/

    • @Autofleet4429
      @Autofleet4429 3 роки тому +2

      The Union jack only flies in port/ special occasions, while at sea the White Ensign is flown from the main mast or other equivalent point on the ship.

    • @bartley7953
      @bartley7953 3 роки тому

      @@Autofleet4429 Yep . The Union Jack is not displayed while at sea or while entering or leaving port just the white ensign . It is displayed while alongside in port .

    • @mayajrj
      @mayajrj 3 роки тому

      @@Autofleet4429 Thank you :)

  • @planerunner4020
    @planerunner4020 2 роки тому +3

    Lol they must have paid around 130,000 for every ship and the AC should be around 400,000. unless somehow egypt gave them a discount

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 2 роки тому

      UK don't have to pay. The built the Suez

    • @planerunner4020
      @planerunner4020 2 роки тому

      @@noodles169 not really, and nope it dosent work like that

  • @andrelimbong4201
    @andrelimbong4201 2 роки тому

    HMS Queen Elizabeth: move out bitchezzz

  • @arwo1143
    @arwo1143 2 роки тому +1

    I wonder how they protect their ships there….
    They can’t make a big area around them that is a free of other ships and dangers because it’s land

    • @doverdown8718
      @doverdown8718 2 роки тому

      they don’t expect any threats

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 2 роки тому +1

      All those ships have phalanx, and 50cal mini guns, plus wildcats hovering above.

  • @andrewoneill144
    @andrewoneill144 3 роки тому

    Can’t believe that the country that gave us nuclear power went with diesel

    • @DrumToTheBassWoop
      @DrumToTheBassWoop 3 роки тому

      Money 💴

    • @noodles169
      @noodles169 3 роки тому

      No need for nuclear. Modern conventional carriers spend more time at sea, than nuclear

  • @leemaguire4331
    @leemaguire4331 3 роки тому

    You would think the Suez could be a very unsafe route for a battle grouping.

    • @mohamedalaa4043
      @mohamedalaa4043 3 роки тому +1

      Why?

    • @iemjgf
      @iemjgf 2 роки тому

      I do not understand about being safe in the Suez canal. This waterway is a lucrative source of income to Egypt and it is well protected. Also, how do you attack a warship that is actually moving in a stretch of water, fully armed with close range weapons? Scores of ships pass through every day, it is one of the most important water routes in the world.