It mentions due process in section one... and none has been afforded yet... plus insurrection is a federal crime. needs the charge and conviction section 3 is not self executing... it does not mention that
According to the United States Constitution, A person accused of a crime must be considered INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty by a court of law. Due process of law and a FAIR trial are the only way to convict a person of a crime. WHAT PART OF THAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
@@tbone8839 the Colorado Supreme Court is a legal institution that held hearings regarding whether rump participated in an insurrection. The Colorado Supreme Court judges are not politicians. You know that right?
@@trishna_6815 The goofball representative in the video is a politician is he not, genius? And i'm sure when another supreme court, the only one that matters, rules the banning unconsitutional you'll respect their judgement as well. I know you will 😏
I’m with Jamie Raskin, Judge Luttig, Lawrence Tribe and the largest portion of Americans. SCOTUS need to rise to the OATH they took to uphold the Constitution.
Yes, or more broadly: using his supporters, an armed mob, to try to ride roughshod over the workings of the institutions of the republic by means of illegal coercion and force. It was, effectivley, the first step in an intended military coup by Trump (the reason it failed wasn't just because Pence an Pelosi didn't give in, but in a wider sense because 45 didn't have any support from top people in the US military).
And if allowed to run & loses again will do it again. He has already said he doesn’t know if he will except the outcome of the election. Another words he will only accept them if he wins.
‘Dictator for the day’ laws need to be passed, powers need to be enabled, constitution needs to be amended for the greater good of a united nation, a United States of America. DJT and Vivek will only need the single day to root out this toxic dissent. A dissent which favours cultural identity and differences over shared values. A dissent which seeks to divide rather than unite. The specific movement which is responsible for this bias hatred needs to called out, names need to be bought out into the open. Evidence of such bias has been seen in the media and recollections made by minorities which have led to the reputation they hold today. The NY region has hundreds of courts, thousands of decision makers, verdicts should take weeks at the most, most certainly not half a dozen years as they will do whatever it takes to ensure the candidate is one of their own, even at the tragic detriment of outsiders DJT and Vivek…
Well you don't stay in office forever, so that's exactly how it goes, you get in have privilege and use it, then one day later on someone else is president. Do you smell pennies?
the mere act of pardoning the insurrectionists IS aiding and abetting, the act of doing nothing while it was going on is at best dereliction at worst treason/insurection
According to the United States Constitution, A person accused of a crime must be considered INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty by a court of law. Due process of law and a FAIR trial are the only way to convict a person of a crime. WHAT PART OF THAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?
1: The constitutional disqualification of government officials who violated their oath of office was central to the 14th Amendment’s goal of ensuring government by persons who could be trusted to be faithful to the Constitution. 2: With one notable exception (a Confederate Justice), Americans during the 1860s regarded Section 3 as self-executing. 3: Section 3 when framed was thought to be an additional qualification for officeholding and not a punishment for crime. 4: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was intended to bar from office any past or present state or federal officeholder who engaged in an insurrection, not just persons who participated in what members of the 39th Congress referred to as “the late rebellion.” 5: The persons who framed Section 3 thought presidents of the United States are officers of the United States who are disqualified from holding future federal or state offices if they engage in an insurrection after or while holding office. 6: The persons who framed Section 3 thought that presidency of the United States was among the offices under the United States that past and present officeholders who participation in insurrections were disqualified from holding. 7: An insurrection at the time Section 3 was framed consisted of two or more persons resisting the implementation of any law by force, violence and intimidation for a public purpose and was not limited to rebellious attempts to overthrow the government. 8: The events of January 6, 2021 are consistent with the legal understanding of insurrection in 1866. 9 Constitutional authorities before, during and immediately after the Civil War maintained that any person who knowingly contributed to an insurrection as having engaged in the insurrection, even if that person did not personally commit an act of violence or was far from the scene of the violence, force, and intimidation.
Yes. The 14th Amendment was written when the Confederation had lost and no one could imagine that they could come back and get support from half of the population. That’s probably why it’s somewhat weak, and does not clearly define president as an Office an insurrectionist should not hold - and just say ”any Office”.
Webster's 1828 definition of insurrection is far closer to what is being talked about than the current defintion: INSURREC'TION, noun [Latin insurgo; in and surgo, to rise.] 1. A rising against civil or political authority; *the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state.* It is equivalent to sedition, except that sedition expresses a less extensive rising of citizens. It differs from rebellion, for the latter expresses a revolt, or an attempt to overthrow the government, to establish a different one or to place the country under another jurisdiction. It differs from mutiny, as it respects the civil or political government; whereas a mutiny is an open opposition to law in the army or navy. insurrection is however used with such latitude as to comprehend either sedition or rebellion. Notice that "protest" would fit here as well, except it isn't against the law to protest, while it IS against the law to enter the Capitol during a closed session of Congress (even if certain police officers broke their own oath to let protestors in).
@@willmont8258 As I wrote, the events of January 6th were most definitely an insurrection. Trump organized it, encouraged it, passively watched it unfold for more than 3 hours, and after it failed he provided, and continues to provide, aid and comfort to his gang of hooligans. Cope and seethe all you want, but the facts of the case are clear as day to anyone who doesn't have their head firmly stuck in Stinky's gargantuan backside.
@@willmont8258You know, one day, Trump WILL be gone. Even if he manages to slip back in the office and get rid of term limits and occupy my government like a dictator, guess what? Nobody lives forever. You need to start thinking about how you want your party to be remembered at this point in history. Do you want to be a part of the cult that all drinks the kool-aid together, or do you want to stand by the rest of your country and fight against the group blindly following orders from one individual with everything to gain? This isn’t about politics. He framed it that way to make you angry and control you. This is about the freedom of our country and our democracy. It’s not one side VS another right now.
The Members of Congress who planed, aided and continue to give comfort to the overthrowing of American Democracy have to be held accountable by the RULE OF LAW
Did he laugh at Joey XIDEN when Joementia shook hands with ghosts, asked for dead people in a crowd, fell up, down, sideways, out his hand over his heart for foreign anthem? 🤣
@@thomasjohn6041 What exactly is your point? Biden isn't really on his game? I agree. Trump doesn't care about anyone but himself and tried to overthrow your democracy! Why are you defending him?
@thomasjohn6041 No, they did not, actually. They were ALL, Britain, France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, etc, actually DELIGHTED and very much relieved to see the back of Trump fall away into the horizon, and happy to embrace a SANE American President once again. FACTS!
MJ drafted letter how to change election. MJ says he’s a constitutional scholar but his stance in Congress is the Bible. LA, vote MJ out of Congress. He’s not eligible under Section 3 of 14th Amendment. Needs to be jailed
SCOTUS is the only entity actually trying to interpret the laws correctly. Pushing a narrative of insurrection, especially after the FBI said there's no evidence, is dangerous. Oh wait, 2 attempted assassination and 1 foiled now. Democraps keeping pushing hatred. What don't you people understand. It's the ultimate manipulation, with the covid lock downs being a close second
Klansman Raskin, Please. Tell that to ALL those Poor Folks who have been DEVASTATED by Klansman Raskin & the rest of your Kkklan OUTRAGEOUS 25% OR MUCH Higher Democrat Food Price Hikes, while causing Real Wages to DECLINE for 34 months straight & counting, as Poverty has DOUBLED. It's Disgusting & Disgraceful
I have heard quite a few people say they don’t care for Raskin. He’s too one sided. Like an attorney, he can eloquenty argue both sides if he wanted to and make it sound like he’s right. Some believe Raskin is smooth talker but also vert hypocritical. I don’t trust him personally to do the right thing for the country as I see it.
I definitely support 100% every single argument what Congressman Prof. Jamie Raskin is explaining very well ! These are representatives who witch our Democracy deserves and needs! Not the MAGA one! Thank you, Jamie Raskin❣️ Thank you, as well, Judge Luttig and Lawrence Tribe❣️🗽🇺🇲💙❤️ ..... by the way, I do not reply to any MAGA supporters or to stupid and disqualifying answers!
Raskin - another vomit-inducing Democrat. There was no 'insurrection'. It was another hoax perpetrated by the same folks who brought you Trump-Russia and Trump-Ukraine. If the Dems try to block Trump from the ballot, if they try to steal the election again, there will be a revolution. The American people are fed up with these folks.
Yeah, the 14th doesn't seem so delicate in it's articulation that it requires too much thought.... and unfortunately for Donald J. Trump, he clearly has breached these terms.
There’s several legitimate legal concerns over the Colorado decision. You can read about them in the dissenting opinions of the judges in that case. I think people are dismissing these arguments a little too easily. It’s much more complicated than most of the comments on UA-cam.
According to the United States Constitution, A person accused of a crime must be considered INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty by a court of law. Due process of law and a FAIR trial. WHAT PART OF THAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?
@@reason6835 I read the dissenting opinions. The president is obviously an officer of the United States and the judicial branch should enforce the ban, since that's what they get paid to do. It's not complicated. People are trying to make this difficult because they are afraid Trump will publicly mock them (tweet or truth). That's his modus operandi. He's been doing it for years and he's gotten very good at it. If he gets the slightest attack, he immediately attacks back via public means. The American people, the judiciary & Congress should not be afraid of a current or former president. Fear is for weak people.
Trump says he didn’t take the oath of office when sworn in. Now says that any office as described in text doesn’t include the president ? All of this should be disqualifying. Vote the GOP out.
Me too. It's there, happening in real time. Congressman Raskin is a gift. After I requested Jamie's book, my little rural library bought it for all to read. Jamie is an intelligent, articulate, caring, passionate politician. I wish we could clone him for Australia, too.
Canada and Australia wouldn't know a real insurrection if it moved into your house the most armed people came to j6 unarmed it was a setup from 3 letter agency's and very corrupt politicians no one has been charged with insurrection as of yet please explain that one
Should they be found wanted and sides with an insurrectionist over Constitution they MUST be disbarred from the bench and impeached by Congress. The sheer amount of ethics and other crimes that court has done, merits impeachment alone.
I don’t think we have to worry .. Perhaps there are at least 100 million witnesses and Trump is getting his day in court. A prosecutor presents the charges and evidence against a defendant, and a defendant has an opportunity to show his innocence. I want a camera and audio in the courtroom.
Just saying, this is the same court that lied in their oath's in regards to ROE to get themselves onto said court. Should they be found wanted they MUST be impeached and removed, stacking the court to fix trumps fuckups is not the answer.@@Shadow-1949
As Judge Luttig said, insurrection is about trying to subvert the peaceful transfer of power required by our constitution. It is not necessarily about deciding whether a violent demonstration meets the standards to be called an insurrection. Yet with that said, both things happened on January 6th. Flags and shields were also used to bash in windows.
I am always impressed Jonathan Capehart's restraint, but I also appreciate hearing more aggressive people like Joe Scarborough. I want to hear both approaches.
.... he's doing his best to deny that Old Joe hasn't benefited from his son's foreign dealings..... but the cheques are made out to Joe and sent to his address...... so I'm not listening to Raskin, if that's OK....
Raskin, knows his profession, he doesn't mince his language with getting the story out about behaviour of what should or shouldn't be. He is a force to deal with these maga Republicans.
I wish Raskin was one who was defending the 14th Amendment to the SCOTUS. He gives great answers to every question thrown at him because he's a constitutional scholar, plus he's just sooooo smart & well spoken!
The 14th amendment section III is common sense. Why would anyone trust an individual who took an oath then breaks that oath only to at a later time be willing to take the same oath they did not keep earlier? Contrary to those who worship Trump, the amendment isn't some kind of word salad the opposition has taken out of their backside to hinder a political opponent.🤨
*14th Amendment section III has nothing to do with January 6.* *And Trump had nothing to do with inciting the riot.* *Actually read Section III -- it says "electors of the President"* *It does NOT say that the President is forbidden from taking office.* *This is why SCOTUS voted 9-0 against Colorado.*
@@micheleandhenrycasavant386 *Who is we?* *Read this carefully Casavant, because it says "elector of" not President or Vice President:* Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, *or elector of* President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. *Jamie Raskin cannot read any better than those fool judges in Colorado.* *That is why the Supreme Court ruled unanimously, all 9 justices against taking Trump's name off the ballot.*
I think that many people are overlooking the second disqualification stipulated in Section 3: giving "aid and comfort" to the enemies thereof... I'm not a lawyer or constitutional scholar, but it sure seems to me that promising pardons to the people convicted of sedition and other offenses in exchange for their votes falls squarely into the definition of "giving aid and comfort"
Watching from afar.Those with sound mind and common sense around the free world who watched that tragic day unfold and followed the inquiry and investigations and the gathering of overwhelming evidence must come to one conclusion that these betrayers of a proud nation should already be in prison.
Rep Raskin is giving off Humphrey Bogart vibes visually in this video. Here’s looking at you kid, hope you’re are still feeling well. You are absolutely a gem in Congress and I wish we had multiples of Jamie Raskin on both sides of the aisle, perhaps our Democracy wouldn’t be in peril.
@@judithmura495 ..... wow!... he, like you, that must make you feel so important.... the fact that he, like you support a dodering Old man who can't remember what he had for breakfast, who can't make it up a set of stairs without falling over, who can't find his way off a stage or can't read an autocue, says a lot about both of you... if 81 million people did in fact vote for Biden and he's the best you've got, what does it say about the rest of you?...
Why is the court and everyone else miss quoiting the 14th amendment ? It does not say congress mist pass a law to disqualify someone from serving in any office. IT SAYS, "Section 3 further provides that Congress may remove the bar from an otherwise disqualified person by a two-thirds vote in each House." Do the words in the constitution THAT SAYS MAY REMOVE (Not must pass) the bar of disqualified person to serve in any office.
The supreme court seem to not understand as Jamie Raskin says that the question the Justices have to answer is: “Are we going to follow the Constitution?”
Do you think the massive amount of people that have been evicted from their homes and are now liviving in tents and cardboard boxes on major city streets will AGREE with you? 🤔
@@mountainghost5044 Depends on how aware they are of what a mess Trump left and the lack of care to handle the pandemic more appropriately. Most of them lost homes because of the lock down and lack of money coming in due to that mishandling which was still going on when Biden stepped in. What's worse is that because there was no cooperation for a smooth transfer he had to hit the ground running with looser plans because he didn't get the information he needed to plan better. Add to that all the GOP obstruction when it came to Biden's attempts at relief... well... very little of it had to do with Biden.
Mr. Raskin u r amazing I watch all ur interviews and ur analysis r absolutely on the dot and any layman can understand the truth. I admire u and wish u to enlighten the truth to the American people to understand how lies r superseding the truth. May god bless u and ur family. From India
@@qualitysure mass political movement that emphasizes extreme nationalism, militarism, and the supremacy of both the nation and the single, powerful leader over the individual citizen.” ”Cough” majority media spreading propaganda, DOJ (gestapo) targeting your political opponents.
@@qualitysure mass political movement that emphasizes extreme nationalism, militarism, and the supremacy of both the nation and the single, powerful leader over the individual citizen.” ”Cough” majority media spreading propaganda, DOJ (gestapo) targeting your political opponents.
I ❤ the way you worded that. "What he says was an insurrection" Why do you say, he says❓ Do you know NO ONE has been charged with Insurrection❓ Do you know why❓ shhhhhh they don't have ANY Evidence, shhhh It's like watching Lucy pull the football from Charlie Brown. Literally Priceless, none of them know yet. LoL
@@Toruk.Makto.Dracarys Insurrection was judged after the civil war. Raskin deemed it an insurrection. I do. Any intelligent person does. The ignorant can say what they like but it is clear by the evidence it was an insurrection, planned well before as one. The result was like all Trump's actions - he failed, because he is a failure in every way.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the ⭐️ PRINCIPAL OFFICER ⭐️ in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. But the Constitution is only a suggestion when it’s inconvenient to Magats.
As usual, Jamie Raskin does a great job of explaining things in language we can all understand. Great reporting. I am glad to see you are looking well again.
We all witnessed it....A conviction is merely a confirmation....Mr. Raskin...you are looking very healthy these days..Thank you for all your wisdom....remember...Manson did'nt lift a finger either.
For most Europeans, it's very hard to understand that questions with most obvious answers are contentious in the USA. From flat earth to insurrection...
I love Jamie Raskin... I love listening to him speak... I am so happy that his hair has grown back from his cancer treatment... I kinda miss the bandanas though... I myself got cancer and had long hair... I lost my hair too.
If this supreme court does not take Trump out of ballot, then the whole supreme court has to be dissolved. Constitution is clear about this issue. It would be a partisan issue to things against the constitution and the laws that binds even supreme court.
Exactly Mr raskins point he doesn't have to be convicted of insurrection he only has to participate in it or even give comfort to insurrectionists to be disqualified from being on most ballots. However on many levels Trump participated in, caused, the insurrection and even had a back-up plan if it didn't work
Bwhahahaha. Loved then the IRS whistle blowers made Raskin look like a fool. I bet you wanted Michael Avenatti in the White House. All the man media puppets loved him! Bwhahahahahaha.
What’s hilarious is that the supremes all know who trump really is. They don’t live in a bubble. They have to do something here or else they’ll lose their jobs under trump. Trump needs to quit saying he’s going to abolish the courts 😂
Yes, plus ridding their party of this orange menace would give their party a re-boot. Will they take the opportunity to pick a real candidate instead of bozo? Probably not.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
They had Civil War t-shirts made! That was a plan not a riot.
Sure did
Exactly.
It was planned and paid for - People bussed in and flown in and back - Well planned riot.
Who are they?.... you have no idea, you're pointing the finger at fresh air.....
@@splendidrush1 The rioters, obviously. There have been over 900 people prosecuted for their actions that day. Do try to keep up my friend.
You either live by your Constitution or you don't ,The 14th amendment is crystal clear what is the problem ??
It mentions due process in section one... and none has been afforded yet... plus insurrection is a federal crime. needs the charge and conviction section 3 is not self executing... it does not mention that
Trump is evil @@sekseemarcuskidd
@@sekseemarcuskidd 😂😂😂Vlad...try harder.
According to the United States Constitution, A person accused of a crime must be considered INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty by a court of law. Due process of law and a FAIR trial are the only way to convict a person of a crime. WHAT PART OF THAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?
Trump is living by the constitution and the entire democrat party and its voters is not.
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Yet know one can say how orange man incited, assists, or engaged in an insurrection.
Weird.
@@thomasjohn6041 Colorado judgment sets it out, maybe you should read it. SCOTUS will have to.
@@ArtyFactual_Intelligence Politicians cant just say someone is guilty of something and it magically becomes true. You know that right?
@@tbone8839 the Colorado Supreme Court is a legal institution that held hearings regarding whether rump participated in an insurrection. The Colorado Supreme Court judges are not politicians. You know that right?
@@trishna_6815 The goofball representative in the video is a politician is he not, genius? And i'm sure when another supreme court, the only one that matters, rules the banning unconsitutional you'll respect their judgement as well. I know you will 😏
I’m with Jamie Raskin, Judge Luttig, Lawrence Tribe and the largest portion of Americans. SCOTUS need to rise to the OATH they took to uphold the Constitution.
Any thoughts of your own?
@@ProJock mt minds like you don't even have thoughts.
Have you checked out the polls yet sweetie?... You're relying yourself with losers as usual.. 😅
@@ProJock Mores the point do you?
I'll go with Allan Dershowiz amd Turley. Throw in some McCarthy. They all say SCOTUS rules for Trump and its done in all 50 states.
He did engage in insurrection he tried to change the outcome of the election, which is the definition of insurrection.
Yes, or more broadly: using his supporters, an armed mob, to try to ride roughshod over the workings of the institutions of the republic by means of illegal coercion and force. It was, effectivley, the first step in an intended military coup by Trump (the reason it failed wasn't just because Pence an Pelosi didn't give in, but in a wider sense because 45 didn't have any support from top people in the US military).
Yep those lying eyes!
And if allowed to run & loses again will do it again. He has already said he doesn’t know if he will except the outcome of the election. Another words he will only accept them if he wins.
Oh and the evidence did this is?!
@gandhithegreat328 he tried to change the election don't need any more evidence than that.
"To know the law"- there it is. Luttig knows the law. Tribe knows the law. Raskin knows the law. The law must prevail. Or there is no law.
I agree wholeheartedly. Thank you.
The law of cancer is readmission in 2 to 5 years and bye bye Raskin
I loved it when the IRS whistleblowers made Raskin look like the fool he is. 😂
Ignore the troll
@thomasjohn6041< This MAGAt troll, Tom Jon, traffics in lies and disinformation ⚠️ 📢
Even if you do not know the law. It is common sense to say someone who violates the oath of office should never be in that office again.
Well, there's goes Biden. Not enforcing our immigration laws is definitely violating his "oath" of office.
Exactly. Like Biden's willful loss of control of a national border for political gain.
Exactly, and absolutely.
its not rocket science the justice better get this right
Or any public office
Can't claim Executive Privilege as President and then Not be in the Office.
But failed intern Donald has a thick skull and dementia😅
Yep!
Trying to play it both ways.. so transparent
‘Dictator for the day’ laws need to be passed, powers need to be enabled, constitution needs to be amended for the greater good of a united nation, a United States of America.
DJT and Vivek will only need the single day to root out this toxic dissent. A dissent which favours cultural identity and differences over shared values. A dissent which seeks to divide rather than unite.
The specific movement which is responsible for this bias hatred needs to called out, names need to be bought out into the open.
Evidence of such bias has been seen in the media and recollections made by minorities which have led to the reputation they hold today.
The NY region has hundreds of courts, thousands of decision makers, verdicts should take weeks at the most, most certainly not half a dozen years as they will do whatever it takes to ensure the candidate is one of their own,
even at the tragic detriment of outsiders DJT and Vivek…
Well you don't stay in office forever, so that's exactly how it goes, you get in have privilege and use it, then one day later on someone else is president. Do you smell pennies?
Republicans, the Party of Small Government, let the States decide - until it doesn't suit them.
@lindabateman329 *To know the law is to understand that Raskin is proposing treason.*
Dumb
@@herealittlewhile7448 *Colorado already tried this stupid stunt and the Supreme Court shut them down 9-0.*
If I am mistaken, but doesn't the letterhead of the President claim it's "The office of the President of the United States of America!?!"
I have been thinking the same thing…
The problem with MAGA is they pick and choose which parts of the Constitution and Bible they want to follow.
Exactly. Where in the Bible does it say that your drug addict son can sell childish artwork to anonymous clients for ridiculous sums of money?
@@aurora_occidentalis2248you mean like trump’s ridiculous egotistical NFT’s? Get a grip.
@@aurora_occidentalis2248 what are you talking about? How does this relate to anything important whatsoever? Absolute fool.
They are jokes!!
@@aurora_occidentalis2248 where in the Bible does it say he can't?
the mere act of pardoning the insurrectionists IS aiding and abetting, the act of doing nothing while it was going on is at best dereliction at worst treason/insurection
Agree 💯. And considering lives were lost that day as a result of his dereliction of duty, seems he is also guilty of manslaughter.
According to the United States Constitution, A person accused of a crime must be considered INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty by a court of law. Due process of law and a FAIR trial are the only way to convict a person of a crime. WHAT PART OF THAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?
Rock on!
@@mountainghost5044So you are going to cut and paste everywhere even though it is false..
@@mountainghost5044Getting sick of copying and pasting that same comment yet dude?
1: The constitutional disqualification of government officials who violated their oath of office was central to the 14th Amendment’s goal of ensuring government by persons who could be trusted to be faithful to the Constitution.
2: With one notable exception (a Confederate Justice), Americans during the 1860s regarded Section 3 as self-executing.
3: Section 3 when framed was thought to be an additional qualification for officeholding and not a punishment for crime.
4: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was intended to bar from office any past or present state or federal officeholder who engaged in an insurrection, not just persons who participated in what members of the 39th Congress referred to as “the late rebellion.”
5: The persons who framed Section 3 thought presidents of the United States are officers of the United States who are disqualified from holding future federal or state offices if they engage in an insurrection after or while holding office.
6: The persons who framed Section 3 thought that presidency of the United States was among the offices under the United States that past and present officeholders who participation in insurrections were disqualified from holding.
7: An insurrection at the time Section 3 was framed consisted of two or more persons resisting the implementation of any law by force, violence and intimidation for a public purpose and was not limited to rebellious attempts to overthrow the government.
8: The events of January 6, 2021 are consistent with the legal understanding of insurrection in 1866.
9 Constitutional authorities before, during and immediately after the Civil War maintained that any person who knowingly contributed to an insurrection as having engaged in the insurrection, even if that person did not personally commit an act of violence or was far from the scene of the violence, force, and intimidation.
Yes. The 14th Amendment was written when the Confederation had lost and no one could imagine that they could come back and get support from half of the population. That’s probably why it’s somewhat weak, and does not clearly define president as an Office an insurrectionist should not hold - and just say ”any Office”.
Webster's 1828 definition of insurrection is far closer to what is being talked about than the current defintion:
INSURREC'TION, noun [Latin insurgo; in and surgo, to rise.]
1. A rising against civil or political authority; *the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state.* It is equivalent to sedition, except that sedition expresses a less extensive rising of citizens. It differs from rebellion, for the latter expresses a revolt, or an attempt to overthrow the government, to establish a different one or to place the country under another jurisdiction. It differs from mutiny, as it respects the civil or political government; whereas a mutiny is an open opposition to law in the army or navy. insurrection is however used with such latitude as to comprehend either sedition or rebellion.
Notice that "protest" would fit here as well, except it isn't against the law to protest, while it IS against the law to enter the Capitol during a closed session of Congress (even if certain police officers broke their own oath to let protestors in).
There was no "insurrection". So you wrote all of that for nothing.
@@willmont8258
As I wrote, the events of January 6th were most definitely an insurrection. Trump organized it, encouraged it, passively watched it unfold for more than 3 hours, and after it failed he provided, and continues to provide, aid and comfort to his gang of hooligans.
Cope and seethe all you want, but the facts of the case are clear as day to anyone who doesn't have their head firmly stuck in Stinky's gargantuan backside.
@@willmont8258You know, one day, Trump WILL be gone. Even if he manages to slip back in the office and get rid of term limits and occupy my government like a dictator, guess what? Nobody lives forever.
You need to start thinking about how you want your party to be remembered at this point in history. Do you want to be a part of the cult that all drinks the kool-aid together, or do you want to stand by the rest of your country and fight against the group blindly following orders from one individual with everything to gain?
This isn’t about politics. He framed it that way to make you angry and control you. This is about the freedom of our country and our democracy. It’s not one side VS another right now.
The Members of Congress who planed, aided and continue to give comfort to the overthrowing of American Democracy have to be held accountable by the RULE OF LAW
@wilfriedholscher7029 ......i agree every democrat should be in prison for that reason
And the DEMOCRATS who voted to not certify results in 2017? They a threat to Democracy? You liberals are such multi faced liars. SMH
Including those Secretary's of State who illegally tried to unilaterally remove the opposition candidate from the ballot. SMH
@@jjones3467 MAGA. When special education is not enough.
@@douglemay7989 ....thank you for proving that you leftist cultists are mentally ill.......you NEVER let us down
Shouldn’t every public official that is tied to January 6 not be allowed to serve in government another day forward
YES!
Would that it were so!
What do you mean "tied to"? Is being "tied to" a crime?
Remember: The United Nations General Assembly LAUGHED in Trump's face because he's so full of... baloney.
Did he laugh at Joey XIDEN when Joementia shook hands with ghosts, asked for dead people in a crowd, fell up, down, sideways, out his hand over his heart for foreign anthem? 🤣
@@thomasjohn6041 What exactly is your point? Biden isn't really on his game? I agree.
Trump doesn't care about anyone but himself and tried to overthrow your democracy! Why are you defending him?
@@thomasjohn6041 < Tom Jon, the MAGAt troll, traffics in lies and disinformation ⚠️ 📢
Cos tRump IS the biggest joke on the planet 😅😅😅😅😅😅
@thomasjohn6041 No, they did not, actually. They were ALL, Britain, France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, etc, actually DELIGHTED and very much relieved to see the back of Trump fall away into the horizon, and happy to embrace a SANE American President once again. FACTS!
Intelligent, articulate, reasonable and well spoken. The polar opposite of Trump and his lackeys.
So intelligent the IRS whistleblowers made him look like a fool. 🤣🤣.
You indoctrinated sheep that watch too much msm are hilarious. 🤣🐑
As a Biden supporter, you shouldn’t be taking about intelligent, articulate, reasonable and well spoken. 🤣🤡
2 WARS Joe has to GO
@@nancyking9033which one was started by the US?
@@rukiddingmeNJas a Trump supporter, neither should you😂😂😂😂😂
“Stand back and stand by,” he said. That refrain also now takes on a chilling new resonance in the wake of the scenes of carnage at the US Capitol.
I found that chilling the moment TFG uttered it.
Thats because you want it to have chilling new resonance. Most sane people would find nothing chilling about it.
@@tbone8839 wumao go home
@@tbone8839 < *T. Bone + Ignorance = DESPERATE MAGAt troll.
@@tbone8839nothing "sane" about him, OR his supporters.
Looking forward to the long list all the others who also have disqualified themselves by the actions they chose.
If the Supreme Court agrees to let the Colorado Ruling stand, more States will follow and more Memeber of Congress will also fall.
Starting with Speaker Mikey Johnson.
MJ drafted letter how to change election. MJ says he’s a constitutional scholar but his stance in Congress is the Bible. LA, vote MJ out of Congress. He’s not eligible under Section 3 of 14th Amendment. Needs to be jailed
This must be the easiest case SCOTUS has ever decided. Those who think it's complicated are those that try to find a way out of it.
Can’t wait to see vote of Ginny’s hubbie and best friend on Scrotus
It is more in Trump’s favor. It is not the easiest scotus case
SCOTUS is the only entity actually trying to interpret the laws correctly. Pushing a narrative of insurrection, especially after the FBI said there's no evidence, is dangerous. Oh wait, 2 attempted assassination and 1 foiled now. Democraps keeping pushing hatred. What don't you people understand. It's the ultimate manipulation, with the covid lock downs being a close second
We are so lucky to have Rep. Jamie Raskin .🇺🇸
I agree,he was so right about Ray Epps😂
Klansman Raskin, Please. Tell that to ALL those Poor Folks who have been DEVASTATED by Klansman Raskin & the rest of your Kkklan OUTRAGEOUS 25% OR MUCH Higher Democrat Food Price Hikes, while causing Real Wages to DECLINE for 34 months straight & counting, as Poverty has DOUBLED. It's Disgusting & Disgraceful
If thats lucky, no thanks.
He is a childish immature brat
I have heard quite a few people say they don’t care for Raskin. He’s too one sided. Like an attorney, he can eloquenty argue both sides if he wanted to and make it sound like he’s right. Some believe Raskin is smooth talker but also vert hypocritical. I don’t trust him personally to do the right thing for the country as I see it.
Jealous, margie?@@margaretcrawford8316
Habba should be dis-barred. Or demoted to a Barbie-class lawyer.
Should every democrat on Epstein list be kicked out of office, dis-barred, be in prison?
@@joakimj4879 You're aware that Trump's name was on the list, right?
@@jasongreene6311They're so thick..😅
@@joakimj4879If they committed a crime then yes. Same applies to Trump who is also on the list. No one is above the law
She said she would rather be pretty than smart.
Love and pardons sound like "Aid and comfort" to me.
So does not going on media or social media and telling the “rioters” to go home when it first started.
Why doesnt someone make this known on Abc, Cbs, and Nbc?
Gave them aid and comfort... Sat and watched it on tv and then had to be convinced to make a statement, where he told them, he loves them
Jamie Raskin is a star. Simple as that.
we are so blessed . We could have lost him . God bless Professor Jaime Raskin
A star. Oh please. He’s an unsavory East Coast elite hack.
@@humphreygruntwhistle3946Na that’s Trumpo
trump troll that you are . Constitution Professor and inspired Congressman Raskin is a blessing @@humphreygruntwhistle3946
It doesn’t matter if one likes him or not, he’s a constitutional scholar.
I definitely support 100% every single argument what Congressman Prof. Jamie Raskin is explaining very well ! These are representatives who witch our Democracy deserves and needs! Not the MAGA one! Thank you, Jamie Raskin❣️ Thank you, as well, Judge Luttig and Lawrence Tribe❣️🗽🇺🇲💙❤️
..... by the way, I do not reply to any MAGA supporters or to stupid and disqualifying answers!
Where does it state in the constitution we are a democracy?
@@Jac-d8jwho is this ? Putin , tRump,, the north Korean dictator or Xi Jinping from China ??
So, don't vote.@@Jac-d8j
Raskin - another vomit-inducing Democrat.
There was no 'insurrection'.
It was another hoax perpetrated by the same folks who brought you Trump-Russia and Trump-Ukraine.
If the Dems try to block Trump from the ballot, if they try to steal the election again, there will be a revolution.
The American people are fed up with these folks.
Of course you do, you're as dishonest as he is.
Yeah, the 14th doesn't seem so delicate in it's articulation that it requires too much thought.... and unfortunately for Donald J. Trump, he clearly has breached these terms.
There’s several legitimate legal concerns over the Colorado decision. You can read about them in the dissenting opinions of the judges in that case. I think people are dismissing these arguments a little too easily. It’s much more complicated than most of the comments on UA-cam.
According to the United States Constitution, A person accused of a crime must be considered INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty by a court of law. Due process of law and a FAIR trial. WHAT PART OF THAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?
It is quite clear if you read it.
@@mountainghost5044 The part that has to YELL so loud.
@@reason6835 I read the dissenting opinions. The president is obviously an officer of the United States and the judicial branch should enforce the ban, since that's what they get paid to do. It's not complicated.
People are trying to make this difficult because they are afraid Trump will publicly mock them (tweet or truth). That's his modus operandi. He's been doing it for years and he's gotten very good at it. If he gets the slightest attack, he immediately attacks back via public means.
The American people, the judiciary & Congress should not be afraid of a current or former president. Fear is for weak people.
Trump says he didn’t take the oath of office when sworn in. Now says that any office as described in text doesn’t include the president ? All of this should be disqualifying. Vote the GOP out.
I saw what happened on Jan 6 at the Capital in Washington. I knew it was an insurrection and I live in Australia. He has to face justice.
Me too. It's there, happening in real time. Congressman Raskin is a gift. After I requested Jamie's book, my little rural library bought it for all to read. Jamie is an intelligent, articulate, caring, passionate politician. I wish we could clone him for Australia, too.
Same from Canada. They need to wake up and stop this craziness.
Canada and Australia wouldn't know a real insurrection if it moved into your house the most armed people came to j6 unarmed it was a setup from 3 letter agency's and very corrupt politicians no one has been charged with insurrection as of yet please explain that one
Wait till everyone finds out there was hundreds of federal agents at the capital that facilitated the so called insurrection
It was a set up by this man’s party! Hate runs deep
"Officer," Trump?
Duuhhh. Yes.
Oath of OFFICE
Which he violated more ways than we know. 😮
And you can't state one way yet "more than we know".
@@tbone8839 Trump is claiming he wasn't an "Officer". Which is it? Conveeeeeenient
@@tbone8839 < *T. Bone + Ignorance = DESPERATE MAGAt troll.
@@tbone8839 < *T. Bone + Ignorance = DESPERATE MAGAt troll.
@@HoneyBadger80886 So he didn't hold the highest office of the land? That'll be news to a lot of people.
Thank God for Raskin's intelligence, it is much needed and empowering in these conflicted times.
Right on Jamie! We need a trial now. Why did the DOJ wait so long?
Should they be found wanted and sides with an insurrectionist over Constitution they MUST be disbarred from the bench and impeached by Congress. The sheer amount of ethics and other crimes that court has done, merits impeachment alone.
I don’t think we have to worry ..
Perhaps there are at least 100 million witnesses and Trump is getting his day in court. A prosecutor presents the charges and evidence against a defendant, and a defendant has an opportunity to show his innocence.
I want a camera and audio in the courtroom.
Just saying, this is the same court that lied in their oath's in regards to ROE to get themselves onto said court. Should they be found wanted they MUST be impeached and removed, stacking the court to fix trumps fuckups is not the answer.@@Shadow-1949
Rep. Jamie Raskin is one smart U.S. Constitutional scholar and congressman.
LoL, Klansman Raskin a Constitutional Scholar, Please. I would say Communist Manifesto Scholar at best.
@@OrangeManRad-uv8wvHow is he awful 😅😅😅😅😅
@@OrangeManRad-uv8wv Sure Comrade.
Yeah, especially when the IRS whistleblowers made him look like a fool. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@Toruk.Makto.DracarysStick to commenting on your own country’s politics, Boris.
What part of "No person..." is so difficult to undersrand?
Knowing you have the power to stop something and do nothing is condoning and aiding that action.
The only ones, right now, who have the power is Republicans. They didn't stop him in his first term, guaranteed they won't stop him now.
As Judge Luttig said, insurrection is about trying to subvert the peaceful transfer of power required by our constitution. It is not necessarily about deciding whether a violent demonstration meets the standards to be called an insurrection. Yet with that said, both things happened on January 6th. Flags and shields were also used to bash in windows.
The constitution 14th Amendment Section 3 is crystal clear. If the SCOTUS DON'T SEE IT. WE OUR IN DEEP SH$T.😂😂😂😂😂
I am always impressed Jonathan Capehart's restraint, but I also appreciate hearing more aggressive people like Joe Scarborough. I want to hear both approaches.
Where would our country be without this incredibly courageous man of principle, Jamie Raskin?!
We'd be a slightly better slightly more honest country without him at least? I dunno you tell me
@@tbone8839 what? Not doing law and order or intelligence anymore? You need to be over on the fact-free sites.
We made it 230 years without him
.... he's doing his best to deny that Old Joe hasn't benefited from his son's foreign dealings..... but the cheques are made out to Joe and sent to his address...... so I'm not listening to Raskin, if that's OK....
Raskin, knows his profession, he doesn't mince his language with getting the story out about behaviour of what should or shouldn't be.
He is a force to deal with these maga Republicans.
Raskin, is a liar.
I wish Raskin was one who was defending the 14th Amendment to the SCOTUS. He gives great answers to every question thrown at him because he's a constitutional scholar, plus he's just sooooo smart & well spoken!
The 14th amendment section III is common sense. Why would anyone trust an individual who took an oath then breaks that oath only to at a later time be willing to take the same oath they did not keep earlier? Contrary to those who worship Trump, the amendment isn't some kind of word salad the opposition has taken out of their backside to hinder a political opponent.🤨
Ask your Democrats.
*14th Amendment section III has nothing to do with January 6.* *And Trump had nothing to do with inciting the riot.* *Actually read Section III -- it says "electors of the President"* *It does NOT say that the President is forbidden from taking office.* *This is why SCOTUS voted 9-0 against Colorado.*
@@williamwhitten7820 We did read amendment 14 section c. We stand by our statement. Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
@@micheleandhenrycasavant386 *Who is we?* *Read this carefully Casavant, because it says "elector of" not President or Vice President:*
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, *or elector of* President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
*Jamie Raskin cannot read any better than those fool judges in Colorado.* *That is why the Supreme Court ruled unanimously, all 9 justices against taking Trump's name off the ballot.*
I think that many people are overlooking the second disqualification stipulated in Section 3: giving "aid and comfort" to the enemies thereof... I'm not a lawyer or constitutional scholar, but it sure seems to me that promising pardons to the people convicted of sedition and other offenses in exchange for their votes falls squarely into the definition of "giving aid and comfort"
Watching from afar.Those with sound mind and common sense around the free world who watched that tragic day unfold and followed the inquiry and investigations and the gathering of overwhelming evidence must come to one conclusion that these betrayers of a proud nation should already be in prison.
*Colorado already tried this stupid stunt and the Supreme Court shut them down 9-0.*
It heartwarming to see Jamie Raskin looking healthy and vigorous manning the battle stations of democracy like the hero he is.
Do you do stand up?....🤣
@@splendidrush1 There is nothing funny about the dangerous situation Donald Trump and his band of nitwit followers have put this country in.
My heart bleeds for garbage.
Is his cancer gone now.
@@DeniseKristian I believe so.
Slugs do not rise to the occasion. They just stay on the ground and leave a trail of slime.
Rep Raskin is giving off Humphrey Bogart vibes visually in this video. Here’s looking at you kid, hope you’re are still feeling well. You are absolutely a gem in Congress and I wish we had multiples of Jamie Raskin on both sides of the aisle, perhaps our Democracy wouldn’t be in peril.
Former teacher of constitution who read the constitution. Peace and health and respect to you, Jamie R
Jamie Raskin looks wonderful!
Thank you for your strength & integrity, Representative.
I love Jamie Raskin ❤❤
You indoctrinated sheep would.
With you there!
Side note here: The Kennedy Center website has a section that anybody can put in a nominee's name & reason why. I put Rep Jamie Raskin !
I Love the work that Jamie Rasking is doing and that he, like me, supports President Biden as our American President!! Vote Biden 2024!!!
@@judithmura495 ..... wow!... he, like you, that must make you feel so important.... the fact that he, like you support a dodering Old man who can't remember what he had for breakfast, who can't make it up a set of stairs without falling over, who can't find his way off a stage or can't read an autocue, says a lot about both of you... if 81 million people did in fact vote for Biden and he's the best you've got, what does it say about the rest of you?...
Was it a Mental Ward?
UUHH.... If Donald Trump was the ????MASTERMIND???... I just can't imagine what could have gone wrong.
Why is the court and everyone else miss quoiting the 14th amendment ? It does not say congress mist pass a law to disqualify someone from serving in any office. IT SAYS, "Section 3 further provides that Congress may remove the bar from an otherwise disqualified person by a two-thirds vote in each House."
Do the words in the constitution THAT SAYS MAY REMOVE (Not must pass) the bar of disqualified person to serve in any office.
The supreme court seem to not understand as Jamie Raskin says that the question the Justices have to answer is: “Are we going to follow the Constitution?”
👍🙏 If we had people like Raskin in power, we would be SO much better off.
The democrats are in power and we are much
worse off. Look at Biden's approval rating.
He explained all about Jan 6 perfectly!!
Those people that think that prices have gone up. Just remember we are recovering from the mess that Donald trump left .
Sure, that's why 538 ABC News poll, Mumbling, stumbling, tumbling, incoherent, lying joe bidens Approval rating Average is 38%. Get a clue!
Do you think the massive amount of people that have been evicted from their homes and are now liviving in tents and cardboard boxes on major city streets will AGREE with you? 🤔
@@mountainghost5044While the rich got richer with Trumps tax cuts…..
@@Helensrant joe bidens lousy approval rating is lower than President Trumps at similar points in presidency. Ouch!
@@mountainghost5044 Depends on how aware they are of what a mess Trump left and the lack of care to handle the pandemic more appropriately. Most of them lost homes because of the lock down and lack of money coming in due to that mishandling which was still going on when Biden stepped in. What's worse is that because there was no cooperation for a smooth transfer he had to hit the ground running with looser plans because he didn't get the information he needed to plan better. Add to that all the GOP obstruction when it came to Biden's attempts at relief... well... very little of it had to do with Biden.
Congressman Jamie Raskin is a national treasure. He is a gentleman and scholar.
Mr. Raskin u r amazing I watch all ur interviews and ur analysis r absolutely on the dot and any layman can understand the truth. I admire u and wish u to enlighten the truth to the American people to understand how lies r superseding the truth. May god bless u and ur family. From India
Raskin rocks!!!
you need help
@@joakimj4879 and you need to look up the definition of fascism-seriously…look it up so you don’t continue to look so foolish.
I Love to Hear him speak. He's Like a preacher that backs it up with scripture, " Look, Read it"!
@@qualitysure mass political movement that emphasizes extreme nationalism, militarism, and the supremacy of both the nation and the single, powerful leader over the individual citizen.” ”Cough” majority media spreading propaganda, DOJ (gestapo) targeting your political opponents.
@@qualitysure mass political movement that emphasizes extreme nationalism, militarism, and the supremacy of both the nation and the single, powerful leader over the individual citizen.” ”Cough” majority media spreading propaganda, DOJ (gestapo) targeting your political opponents.
"We love you, you're very special." That's providing aid and comfort to insurrectionist. He did this to himself.
Jamie Raskin is the best constitutional analyst I have heard on Trump on what he says was an insurrection.
I ❤ the way you worded that. "What he says was an insurrection" Why do you say, he says❓ Do you know NO ONE has been charged with Insurrection❓ Do you know why❓ shhhhhh they don't have ANY Evidence, shhhh It's like watching Lucy pull the football from Charlie Brown. Literally Priceless, none of them know yet. LoL
@@Toruk.Makto.Dracarys Insurrection was judged after the civil war. Raskin deemed it an insurrection. I do. Any intelligent person does. The ignorant can say what they like but it is clear by the evidence it was an insurrection, planned well before as one. The result was like all Trump's actions - he failed, because he is a failure in every way.
Elephant EarsPress Look up Richard Painter. ( Your welcome )
@SenRaskin, you look great. Thanks for your Service. Be well. ❤
Thank you Jamie.
Congressman Raskin speeks truthfully about our constitution ❤
Great call out to Maxwell Frost. He's awesome!!
Office of the President? Like in the Oval Office? Duh!!!
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the ⭐️ PRINCIPAL OFFICER ⭐️ in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
But the Constitution is only a suggestion when it’s inconvenient to Magats.
Thank you Mr. Raskin....for giving us hope and direction. I am quite frightened about the future.
Congressman Raskin is the best 💙🇺🇸✌️
And this is exactly what they accuse Trump of, this makes me sick, it’s time all these ppl r voted out, especially Jamie raskin!
Now I understand more about him how he did on January 6. He still argues against us that he was doing right-- Great America
I hope Mr. RASKIN is well recovered from cancer. Hope it is in remission and stays there❤
Karma, a &itch.
Raskin u rock 😊😊
Mr. Raskin is a great Book of knowledge!!!!!!!!..
Is it possible that if the Supreme Court finds for Trump, can that be considered aiding and obebettting the enemy?
As usual, Jamie Raskin does a great job of explaining things in language we can all understand. Great reporting.
I am glad to see you are looking well again.
I’ve lived in Maryland all my life. So please tell me what Jamie Raskin, has done for the American people.
Raskin is the only one who is explaining exactly what we are seeing with clarity and truth.
Try MidasTouch for TRUTH!
Absolutely he did!!
We all witnessed it....A conviction is merely a confirmation....Mr. Raskin...you are looking very healthy these days..Thank you for all your wisdom....remember...Manson did'nt lift a finger either.
Crunch time for the US of A. The world awaits!
What about aid and comfort? No one's talking about that.
For most Europeans, it's very hard to understand that questions with most obvious answers are contentious in the USA.
From flat earth to insurrection...
I used to wonder why Europeans thought Americans were stupid. Now I see it. But I still don’t think most of us are. Vote blue America!
Yep. Raskin ,,please run for President!!! We need
YOU💙❣️
Like we need a cold sore. You indoctrinated sheep that watch too much msm are hilarious.
I remember when all the sheep loved Mike Avenatti. 😂😂😂😂
He wasn't charged because they know he didn't. Where is the charge Ratskin?
The best Constitutional experts have called it an insurrection.
That was awesome, thank you!
No, it was set up by your party Raskin!
Thank you Rep. Jamie Raskin for keeping it real!!!
Rep. Raskin has my deepest respect; a man who one can put their trust & confidence in.😊❤
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
ENFORCE the US Constitution
I love Jamie Raskin... I love listening to him speak... I am so happy that his hair has grown back from his cancer treatment... I kinda miss the bandanas though... I myself got cancer and had long hair... I lost my hair too.
If this supreme court does not take Trump out of ballot, then the whole supreme court has to be dissolved.
Constitution is clear about this issue. It would be a partisan issue to things against the constitution and the laws that binds even supreme court.
Exactly Mr raskins point he doesn't have to be convicted of insurrection he only has to participate in it or even give comfort to insurrectionists to be disqualified from being on most ballots. However on many levels Trump participated in, caused, the insurrection and even had a back-up plan if it didn't work
I’ll vote for Raskin for POTUS, only after I vote for Joe in 2024.
Raskin for POTUS 2028!
Raskin should be sitting in the Oval Office.
too young. in this country we want 90 year old geezers runnin things. 🤠
Raskin 2028
@@layneannen no 6 pointed star satanists aloud
Bwhahahaha. Loved then the IRS whistle blowers made Raskin look like a fool.
I bet you wanted Michael Avenatti in the White House. All the man media puppets loved him! Bwhahahahahaha.
@@JoSeF... I remember when anti-Semites used to hide in public.
Raskin is just pure quality, clear and honest.
He is a phony. He also was big on "collusion" which was BS.
What’s hilarious is that the supremes all know who trump really is. They don’t live in a bubble. They have to do something here or else they’ll lose their jobs under trump. Trump needs to quit saying he’s going to abolish the courts 😂
Yes, plus ridding their party of this orange menace would give their party a re-boot. Will they take the opportunity to pick a real candidate instead of bozo? Probably not.