I have owned Glocks since the early 90's, never liked the grip angle but adapted to it because of the reliability. Twelve or so years ago I got my first M&P, very natural feel. Now have Glocks, Sig 320 X-full and a line of M&P's. I carry a Sig 365XL daily but still go for the M&P's for most other shooting. With having 2 full size M&P's for 12+ years with thousands upon thousands of rounds of brass, alum and mostly steel case ammo ran through them without issues, I trust the M&P as much as the Glocks.
I have owned Glocks since the early 90's, never liked the grip angle but adapted to it because of the reliability. Twelve or so years ago I got my first M&P, very natural feel. Now have Glocks, Sig 320 X-full and a line of M&P's. I carry a Sig 365XL daily but still go for the M&P's for most other shooting. With having 2 full size M&P's for 12+ years with thousands upon thousands of rounds of brass, alum and mostly steel case ammo ran through them without issues, I trust the M&P as much as the Glocks.
I like and respect your opinion, I often find that people make excuses. They are so into training but find an issue with something simple.
Mullet Glocks!!!
I like sigs but honestly glock angles are natural to me (sigs and most pistols nose down)
glock is better in my opinion
personally prefer the 1911 style of hand grips, but I went with an XD9 n a P220 legion