AI will replace 80% of all editors
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 чер 2023
- My take on AI and what it means for editors. Check out my free editing mini-course: secreteditinghacks.com
★- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ★
Want More THIS GUY EDITS?
☆Connect With Me:☆
➜ MY FREE WEBINAR-
filmindustrysecrets.com
➜ ONLINE EDITING COURSE-
thegotoeditor.com
➜ PATREON MEMBERSHIP-
/ thisguyedits
➜ INSTAGRAM-
/ thisguyedits
➜ TWITTER-
/ thisguyedits
➜ FACEBOOK GROUP-
/ thisguyedis
➜ MY EDITING SETUP-
kit.co/thisguyedits
★- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ★
Music by Epidemic Sound - Get one month free here: thisguyedits.com/epidemic
#thisguyedits.com/5dd
All Rights Reserved
© Copyright 2023 This Guy Edits™ - Фільми й анімація
Check out my free editing mini-course: secreteditinghacks.com
I guess you are back in the USA with your family after spending the summer in wet hot dry germany cause that is the summary of that summer - from a solar power roof designer. And therefore I kindly like to remind you about an Update of the whole Tesla Solar Roof series I really liked cause it shows the tech and procedures from the administrative part as a customer to the moments where the things started , throwing the old roof in the trash and solar power preparation to the first shingles and these metal shingles to fill the unused spots.
I like the whole story and the aftermath videos which are the usual stuff cause it is at the end not rocket science but takes a lot to get it done perfect , I mean the whole solar system.
But that would require a lot of knowledge transfer which you were able to tell afterwards like the string / mppt thing and roofs. I also had seen a lot of these shadow throwers trouble makers, these pipes and what not which would make a usual solar guy crazy in case he wants to use big panel cause that would be the biggest mess on your kind of roof to find the perfect size or set of sizes to use it the most.
Obviously it can not deliver 7,8 kW which I bet they never had promised. It is most likely the amount of power installed in kWp or the inverter output, but that means nothing cause the pitch, orientation and shadows are determing what you might get out of a system. So many complain that their system is not good or not delivering even though it is. You had also gotten the key message from someone else to work on your roof outlets / pipes and get it cleaned up to benefit more from it which rarely happens. The realisation usually comes later or too late while the work on site is going on and someone will mention that like a "get rid off the pipes and clean it, cause you can make money with a clean roof, but not from shadow causing pipes and chimneys in every third tile.
Therefore I would love to see a 3 year result summary, how that garage upgrade had worked out or if you might have gone for a different solution like panels - which never would have make sense except for comparison, cause tesla referalls would bring you far more than any other option cause tesla is the only country wide operating installer I guess where you had done already all the videos and steps.
Maybe you do a simple and short summary of the results, observations, the post honeymoon depression about things that work not out as expected or faults and so on, not such big one as in the past. Good luck and happy new year - from germany.
I can't believe I live in a time where artistic things are being industrialized
Heh.. dude.. it's hardly the beginning of mass produced art.. and, you're kinda fundamentally off point, because at least every AI image generated, is unique..
I am too, but honestly we shouldn’t be. Look at Hollywood or the gaming ‘industry’ etc. We’ve been industrializing Art for generations now using it as a product and to advertise products. After many generations, we artist have finally streamlined art the same way Ford streamlined car production.
@@fx-studio how do you know they didn't? we've all heared of the saying "starving artist." I bet a lot of artist were working those manufacturing job or at least their parents/ family's or friends were.
@@fx-studio Yep, because you lack interest in culture in the first place. That is not some artist's fault.
Depressing, right? 😒
I think that's about right. I also don't think this is going to be nothing more than "helpful tools". The goal is to replace as many people as possible to maximize profits and minimize expense. They will come up with something for prompt based editing just like everything else computerized is becoming. This is also hitting me as a musician who writes commercial music for media and my regular job as an analyst. I'm running out of options!
The problem is that techies and business people don't understand creatives. They only look at the tech and how to find ways to automate and earn profits with no concern over human creativity. We enjoy experimentation and manipulation. We don't want to just type a prompt and have the computer do everything. We want to be "physical" and take pride in what we were able to accomplish, not what a computer can accomplish.
At some point, I think Ai will be able to analyze successful films, learn the edits that work for the type of film and emotional cues that have worked in the past and eventually have the ability to innovate. So, I'm not optimistic. The sad thing is that this is totally unnecessary for any purpose other than making profits. It won't help mankind, stop climate change, solve medical mysteries, create world peace, etc. We never needed AI for creative endeavors for any reason other than to help with menial tasks that allow us to work faster. Replacing us only helps a production company's bottom line.
I recently tried out Autopod, the podcast editing AI plugin, that's been making rounds on all socials. It's good for when multiple people are talking over each other as it makes cuts whenever an audio track is active, but it doesn't cut out the "ums" or silence that I was hoping it would do. I'm sure AI video editing can give us very rough passes, but it's not gonna to replace quality anytime soon, I hope. 🤞
The thing is, autopod isn't even an ai tool, it's simply analysing where the silence is depending on the track and cutting accordingly without the use of machine learning. All an AI system needs to cut out the "ums" is reference to how that sounds like, and you're done. Pair that with what adobe is releasing with firefly (later this year from what I've heard) where it can add B-Roll to an audio track accurately and with the music, and boom half the podcast editing jobs are gone because unfortunately you don't really need much more than that. Just what I've been thinking, and yeah it's pessimistic but expecting the worst and it not happening is better imo than expecting the best and everything completely exploding lol
AI will learn very fast which is the problem
I feel like I've heard that some AI already cuts out the ums. If I'm wrong, it's something that's very easy to teach AI, it can come instantly.
Loved you at the panel, sorry to hear you got it too! I just finished recovering.
This topic is one that is really terrifying to me, because I feel like it eliminated so many lower level opportunities for people to build up towards sitting in the chair. A lot of rungs on the ladder are going away.
It's probably going to become more competitive in the future because I have a strong feeling that AI will soon erase the need for assistant editors which will make it harder to get into the business. It's scary, I think, because even without AI many movies become formulaic due to the creative process being standardized and faster-paced and even with an editor and a director present to oversee it, there is a risk that a movie misses potential when it's not thoroughly viewed through a human's eyes. But it's interesting to see where it will go!
That's true, but perhaps there will simultaneously be more creativity allowed in many projects because of the speed up of the existing process.
It's currently all just really really really good pattern recognition (our CNSs aren't only that), so until AI (and we) can actually understand how we think and see the world, it will consistently make some average percentage of bad choices. Context and culture are infinite, and you cannot train on all the FINITE data we have anyhow. It's almost magic what it can do with the current, relatively limited datasets they get. (I'm glad we moved past knowlege engineering!) Also, current AI models will only recognise new once trained on it. A lot.
Digital cameras, and VHS tape recorders before that lowered the bar of entry, and a lot more bad content was created. But more good content too. It helped beginners learn by trying, and allowed pros to try more things with less money.
Perhaps I'm naive, but I think AI will do the same; Help beginners learn by trying, and allow pros to try more things with less money.
UA-cam allowed for publishing more bad work, but also more good (+TikTok, vine etc). Mass prodcution, more bad, also more good. CGI vs practical effects, more bad also more good. (Popular opinion, practical effects + cgi touchup is (often) better than fully CGI. AI editing will imo be the same.)
But for most non-low effort content that requires at least a little quality, I think assistant editors will still be needed to proof the AI rough cuts, and even have more time and room to be creative and pass more potential ideas to leads.
Things will shift, but probably won't crumble
p.s.
I have zero expertise in ecenomics, or the editing industry. I've also only been working in comp sci for under 2 years as a non-AI SoftEng, and only have a bach. So defintiely file this under wild speculation of truly under-informed overly-optimisitc stranger on the internet.
@@zedekai9456 "Digital cameras, and VHS tape recorders before that lowered the bar of entry, and a lot more bad content was created. But more good content too. It helped beginners learn by trying, and allowed pros to try more things with less money."
The other effect of that was that recording things was devalued. Which makes sense - it is a market, there is limited demand and therefore the prices drop. It does however mean, that there will be fewer bread-and-butter jobs which would allow following artistic endeavours.
"But for most non-low effort content that requires at least a little quality, I think assistant editors will still be needed to proof the AI rough cuts"
Which means one assistant can do the work of several. The phases of work, where it comes to trying out stuff, are taken away in favor of more productivity - for somebody else.
There is little point of optimism.
@@zedekai9456 LOVE your reply! I do agree. I'm 63, was a photographer for decades. I remember when I was a teen, my Dad met a man who worked for Nat Geo who said, 'Tell your daughter to NOT get into photography, it's very tough.' Some fields are tougher than others. But man oh man, I'm glad I got out of restaurant/hotel work!!! No regrets. ;)
You fuckers need to stop shooting with digital cameras. Cinema died when it went digital.
AE's are glorified secretaries. Redundant and unnecessary.
finally someone who is actually scared of AI in this field! lol. honestly. all i read is people saying "all tech in human history ended up hiring more than firing" and "when new tech appears, people are always scared". nope. this is something else. and its gonna affect all industries, in all sectors.
if you can, please make a video about this software you were invited to test that you mentioned. im curious.
Exactly, people saying 'Oh AI is just another tool like computers, digital tech, etc. ' , no morons it is not. Your just another tool is actually a highly efficient intelligent cyborg - the tool and user is combined and can work many times faster than you.
And the sad part is that I am an aspiring filmmaker still learning the ropes of editing. I have started learning Resolve by reading the user manual taking time out of my regular job. I am already behind in my filmmaking dream.
We had had the hope that filmmaking had never been more accessible than previous generations, but now with the possibilities of machines making movies, that hope though still there yet seems pointless.
Really appreciate your honesty and insights into the potential impact of AI on the editing industry. Your heartfelt honesty in sharing your fears struck a chord with me. It's a brave new world out there and your vulnerability in acknowledging the potential challenges and uncertainties is both frightening and inspiring. Your words have made me realize that we are all in this together, facing the unknown, but still holding on to our passion for storytelling. Please continue to share your journey with us. It's through such real, heartfelt conversations that we find the courage to navigate these changes. Your courage lights the way for all of us.
I used Adobe Premiere Pro with the AI transcript editing mode. It was extremely helpful to have the client remove unwanted content from a printed transcript and made the workflow smoother. I still had to go in and refine the rough cut and make it what we wanted. But how long before the machine can do it too?
Great points!
I feel it really depends on what kind of project you do. Of course just easy multicam talk editing can be automated. But cutting an interview of 30 min into 5 min? An AI would need to know what is important and the purpose.
It can also only do stuff that has been done before
Rather than scrubbing through the material, it will be possible to edit the text and the picture then follows as well as possible. An automatic screwdriver does not turn screws on its own. It just makes it a lot easier. Soon this can easily done by somebody not having edited at all in their whole life. The work is still there, but it does not require expertise.
@@Schmidtelpunkt yup, the same thing happens in the (musical) record industry,
only a few large and medium-sized studios survive. Some sort of "structural canvas" survives, but many jobs simply disappeared
Its possible if you input a set of criteria it to cut to.
@@Schmidtelpunkt we are talking about ai though, this already existed for a while. Guess it kinda uses ai, but people already do it.
What I'm getting at mor is that this would remove a job of a transcriber, not of an editor. Yeah would make it faster to edit, but not remove a job.
@@TheWhitePianoKeyProductions The transcription is just the first half - the second half is what becomes possible: A journalist editing the transcription and the program editing the video based on that, removing the necessity for the AI to understand what is important. And still removing an expensive editor from the bill.
How often does the 5 Day Deal event take place?
Can you tell me where to find this AI editor that will replace me? I could really use its help with my workload hahaha.
i started with film editing on beta tapes, moved on to music videos on computers, move on to zerodeadline news editing on betas, moved from there to super-fast news editing on computer again, retired due to illness. now i occasionally edit music videos, being free to choose projects, completely stress-free and loving it more than ever. AI will eventually "create" a flood of generic, ergo boring video content. a good editor knows the rules and knows how and when to break them. AI will learn the rules and stick to it...
Being an interesting content creator will literally never be replaced by AI. Just make creative projects and content and build an audience that you own.
I am glad bcoz indie filmmaker's and bloggers can get a project done quickly
And indie editors ?
It seems to me that the affect AI will have is editors will be more like an overseer that directs AI programs in how they go about a project, the purpose and such, it will be a much easier job and will probably pay way less I would guess, very unfortunate. I'm glad I went into a labor field remodeling houses because I think that sort of work will be the last to get hit because it will take advanced and inexpensive robotics to replace us, I'm sure it will happen in my lifetime though.
Human error will be a hot commodity. Until AI replicates it with a superior error.
That error being us. 🔁 (The human condition will not be automated.)
@@funkymunky Pain don't hurt.
@@mightisright When it's au chocolat.
An AI can do the initial assembly based on the script and “learning” as AIs start to digest film and video libraries. But it’s definitely going to take time before it can understand the nuances required in telling stories, and then it will only be mimicking and extrapolating editing styles and decisions. That being said, I don’t know if 80% is accurate, but it is going to be a significant percentage, and that’s goin to hurt.
Hi Sven and thank you for sharing! As a film editor myself, I think a lot of the mainstream entertainment editorial workforce (think about reality shows as an example) could and/or will be axed down by A.I. For the cinema/tv-shows side of things I think it will be either something entirely made in AI (you push a button and it spits out a finished movie in a week) or not. I don't think the directors I work with (or most of the directors) will be willing to take all the sweat and blood they put in filming and painstakingly crafting the puzzle and just shove it into the mouth of the machine. Just my 2cents :)
Good overview!
Are you in IATSE? I'm in the process of joining and I believe organizing other freelance editors is going to be essential if we want any stability long term.
Because I think you're right that as soon as "good enough" is possible for corporate edits, etc most editors will be on the chopping block. But the WGA's demands for AI to not replace existing jobs is a good precedent for struggle with IP owners over AI.
I am curious to know what your thoughts on SORA and cinemtography? You sound very prescient in this video from only a year ago!
Sorry l, my man - no way is AI going to replace 80% of editors in my opinion for the reason you stated in the video. AI won't understand pace. It will look at a gazillion examples and emulate them, but it wont understand them. If it cuts out all my selects and organises my shots then i say hell yes to that but as for building anything close to finish, i dont think so.
If it boosts editors productivity by 80% without an increase in demand for editors, 20% of editors will be able to do all the work and those 80% are still out of work.
You can tell AI the pace and style you are looking for. It will use the same "creative" process we have, which is using references, things we see and learn.
This is where the prompt designer and the prompt engineer come in. It will be able to understand pace. You will be able to ask it to create an educational video in the style of Wes Anderson, or cut like so and so editor in this film or that film, adding transitions, like in Scott Pilgrim. It will do whatever you like. The quality will depend on the LLM and the prompt. You'll have voice over options, using whatever voice you like and add B-Roll on whatever subject and in any style you like. The editor will be a bit like witness to to a murder working with a sketch artist today
This is still outdated knowledge about AI, modern AI models do learn,more than humans and deeper. They rewrote the way chess and go is played because they understood it in such a deeper way than humans, I don't know why this is any different. This is basically humans trying to justify their worth in face of a better, faster thing. It's kinda funny how much you underestimate them.
@@funkahontas How long has AI transcription been around now in Premiere? A year? Year and a bit? Is it perfect? Do you think a senior client or decision maker would be happy letting Prem do the subs on a movie or doco without human cross checking and adjusting? And bear in mind, that's just voice to text, not all the rest of what's being talked about here. Until AI editing actually *is* perfect, and until businesses are 100% behind total automation, I'm not going to freak out. And if / when that day happens, you best believe that society at large will more than likely have bigger fish to fry than 80% editors being out of work.
I'm happy for doomsayers to talk revolution though, go for it.
Scary stuff
I think at some point AI will be able to anticipate audience reactions based on data from past successful movies, as well as the social and emotional climate of the world at the time it is building the cut.
And then we'll have Avengers 28...
Just half as good as a human, but as the audience by then will have unlearned how well things can be made, it will be good enough. We have seen the same with screenplays. And music.
As an editor who works on unscripted TV shows all day every day, I can't really see how AI is going to replace editors. How can you trust the AI to make all the tiny decisions and all the big decisions when the precise format, pacing and storyline aren't all perfectly laid out? I make literally thousands of small decisions every day. I need to communicate to producers constantly. I think AI will bring huge productivity gains and will eliminate the need for a lot of AEs and graphics people, but for video editors working on complex projects, I just don't see it happening anytime soon.
first quarter of next year there will be an AI editor for UA-camrs and that will cut a lot of us editors out but i hope there will still be room for work.
Tell this to high tier clients and companies that have media companies making small detailed changes till they want it 100% how they like it. It will be a tool for us, but when it comes to changing the 20% for them that will be for the editors and post production team.
80% is way too scary 😢
@♢ The Dream Arena AI's got 120% of UX Designers... it's more aggressive there than with film editing
@♢ The Dream Arena User Experience Designers
Exactly my fear! Have been thinking about this for the past 6 months :/
I agree with you and I can see Ai doing a lot of the work and yes, replacing 80% of the editor out there. The reason I say that is because a lot of the editor out there are not actual editors and they can cut a video together on a timeline for sure, but creating a story structure and driving the audience from one point to another with a very precise editing, not even Ai will be able to replace that. The editor that utilize Ai to boost thrift craft will be the ones standing out as well.
Thanks for the video.
💯
I would love to use AI to take over some of the pre-processing (sorting, tagging, setting possible cut markers, etc.). The creative side should always remain human for anything to be considered art - in my opinion.
i actually think AI will help ALOT of editors and concept artists become legit film makers themselves. People in the creative industries arent monoliths who only want to do one creative job. Like fiincher said, if the audience knows you can do anything in film because the technology has gotten so good the question no becomes what don't you do. Creativity in the future is going to be highly in tune with instinct more than skill nd that is a verry good thing. The concept of Collage was practically born when digital tech was infused into the art making process, that opened doors to a new kind of artistic form that is very ferociously instinctual and unique, ai is going to expand our ability to collage faster across various mediums.
AI can never reproduce human inspiration and creativity because inspiration and creativity are spiritual connections to our subconscious selves. Whether you believe in God or creation or anything other than atoms and electrons, the reality is true art is not based on an algorithm, it’s something deeper that can never truly be fabricated.
Welcome back to Germany 😊 And yes, how you describe it AI will take over a huge part. That’s also true for the area where I earn my money (blogging). We just need to adapt. Those who bury their heads in the sand will ‚lose‘
I have trouble understanding the concept of AI replacing everything. If it does it eliminates the assets needed for R&D. R&D is AI’s food.
Also, people keep talking about AI like it is simply new tech. When in reality the technological shift is equivalent to the wheel or forging steel or the atomic bomb.
There is a lot regulation that is coming for this stuff which is why I have been afraid to incorporate too much of it into my creative workflow.
When I see AI art, photos and film clips I still see too many shades of other things. AI copyright tools will catch all of this and if you generate a script in GTP4 and infringements are found in the future you are screwed.
With that said, I say jump all in and learn this stuff but the reality is that the vast majority of time spent editing is determining anticipation and reaction. Unless singularity becomes a real thing I have a hard time seeing that kind of AI capability in the near future.
Another good point someone made.
Did we even ask for this stuff? Call me an OG but I feel AI art and music should be banned outright.
Story telling can’t be replaced at least no time soon but effects will yes they already have but story telling na not right now
I doubt it. Creative cuts and transitions will never become AI generated.
I've seen a demo of an AI controlled NLE cut a comedic moment. It may not realize yet how good of a cut it was, but it was very good.
sure, never. live in your bubble :D
I feel like your statement of own your own art is a double edged sword as in editors are just that editors and generally are contracted to help someone else story.
AI will learn from the past, but the future belongs to us.
Until an AI has been born, made friends, been hurt, felt joy, felt pain, love, dealt with humans and human emotion, it will never be able to evoke emotion in a viewer. Same goes for Ai creating music or any artistic medium. There's more to art than the mechanical steps that need to be executed.
Yeah, you're absolutely right, this video is not funded on any real arguments..
I think an AI will be able to look at all the sad movie scenes of all time and eventually figure out how to write one.
Man, if you really believe this.. i pitty you. Noone in the mainstream gives a flying f if there was a real editor with felt pain or it was made by an AI. Even if there are things we would call "errors" or whatnot, noone of the masses cares.
@@Stefan-sc7xl So basically you're saying that the audience doesn't care for good quality editing, with or without AI? 🤔 Maybe your emotions play a part in this..
Remember the time all movies made were superhero movies? Those people don't really care about editing, but such a large part of the audience never did or ever will.
Most of todays art doesn’t evoke emotion tho unfortunately
On the other hand, there is the possibility that a lot more content will be created. When our ancestors invented the plow, they didn't go on a vacation having to work less, they just made bigger crops with the same amount of people working (basically). It's called the Rebound effect and I heard that that was basically the essence of the exponential growth of the human civilisation for the last 10 000 years.
You say producers are thinking "we can make the same amount of content 80 cheaper !" But maybe they'll say "For the same amount of money we were spending so far, we can create 80% more content !" (80% is an example)
Then the problem is not IA it's capitalism lol
i remember when machines replaced people, like textile workers, in 19th cent. rough times... poor writers.
Its sad, I miss the VHS times. 🥸
How many years will it take to replace graphic designers with Ai? I guess they will be the first to go down
Literally everyone in the creative field will go down. Only ones surviving are poeple having "practical" jobs, like moving an elderly out of their bed, building houses, etc.
If movies and stories are a joe-job, then this is another page turning. If this is your passion, then where can you learn and train if the jobs dry up into ever-fewer older hands? Is the point art or business?
Editing my film (16mm feature opening scene sequence) I found that I was discovering and using audio from rehearsals and outtakes that affected the overall feeling and effect of the final edit. I do not see how an AI would consider these variables in an artistic manner rather than outputting an efficient sequence.
It feels very premature to suggest this will happen at this stage. This generative "AI" could just end up being a fad like cryptocurrency and NFTs and die out as quickly as it came. Let's give it a few more years first before we all give up on our dreams.
I for my part am unreplaceable. AI simply couldn't talk shit about the riders while watching the Giro d'italia with my author.
Computers can't really replace editors, and there's no reason for them to, except for saving someone else money.
uh what
X for doubt.
All right, I have an important question first of all: Why do I see Richarlison in the thumbnail????? 😭😭😭
Clients would need to know what they want first before 80% of editors are taken over by AI lol so we're fine
Noone gives a flying in f in the future. There are no clients, everyone will make their own content, just write in your phone "i want a movie with that and that" and then watches it, and then moves on. But sure, will take still time until all this reaches the "real world".
@@Stefan-sc7xl it won’t. There will always be clients and producers, or head of departments. Content creators will take a hit, but not so much creatives that work in the industry on large scale shoots. AI is just a super plug-in at this point that still need’s corralling and artistic direction
I might sound very pessimistic but why do I feel like us humans always work towards our downfall...
A lot of editing involves emotion, which AI (at least not yet) doesn't have.
DEEP LEARNING(Subset of AI) IS ALL ABOUT MIND AND EMOTION...SURE IT WILL TAKE TIME TO BE GOOD AS A HUMAN..BUT I THINK IT WILL DEFEAT ONE DAY OR ANOTHER
@@rockyr2248 OKAY THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT
I believe AI will lower the threshold of technical skills required in being able to edit in future, hence the industry will then become oversaturated in "editors" that then lowers the pay for editing services. So if you do editing for the love and passion, you'll have nothing to worry about.😎
Passion isn’t going to pay anyone’s bills though. I edit because I enjoy it AND I can currently make a living doing it, but AI is about to drive the market value of video editing services into the dirt
When do you think the turning point will be were AI takes over And start replacing peoples jobs. Like do you think it will be in months, years, or maybe even decades
not months, and not decades :)
Thanks :)
Its ok for AI to replace jobs that nobody wants to do, but politicians should prohibit companies from interfering even further in creative jobs.
I think, unfortunately for us, even the "feels" side of editing will be replicated by AI enough to make that number 99.9% of all editors.
Of course. Only question remains how long it still takes until this reaches the "mainstream". It usually takes very long until something that we all know in our bubbles will reach the "real world". So yeah. 10 years? 100? 1?
@@Stefan-sc7xl You are right, but judging by the speed of improvement, and the adage that 'people overestimate what can happen in a year and underestimate what can happen in 10', I'm going to guess 3-5 years!
AI will replace many people across many modalities. You have to adjust. Just like the cobbler and the saddler.
I can't wait for a client to say "I want it to feel more cinematic, yet quiet and edgy" to an AI. Let's see how that goes.
Press a button and the AI will spit out 25 variations on possible edits. Choose the ones you like and nix the ones you don’t, hit remix and go again. Human editing will be the same as it has always been “choosing what you want.” You just won’t have to do the mechanical work. The interface will get out of your way and “taste” will reign supreme.
Это очень глупо! ИИ с удовольствием заменит какую-то тупую работу типо чернового монтажа или разбора исходных видео. Но вот сам монтаж, само формирование сценарной структуры и ЗАПРОСА ИИ заменить не сможет. Попробуйте сейчас сгенерировать картинку без четкого запроса! Вы получите что-то посредственно не отвечающее задаче. А чтобы сгенерировать то что нужно, нужно учить промпты. Так вот, задачу/запрос/промпт может давать только человек разбирающийся в теме. И это точно не ваш заказчик. Это мы с вами, монтажеры.
Whattttttttt!!!!!
Hopefully, in the future, we won't need to shoot or edit a video. Imagine a world where we can simply prompt the AI, and it flawlessly crafts a video that tells the story with perfect visuals. It's like having a professional editor at our fingertips, working in harmony with our creative vision.
The efficiency and precision that AI brings to video production are truly remarkable. With AI's ability to generate videos to the point, we can save valuable time and resources, focusing more on refining the final touches and adding our personal touch. It's an exciting glimpse into the future of content creation and storytelling.
Yikes!
AI will dominate all things digital.
Lol yeah the job I’m doing today could totally be done by an AI… I’ll just be here until they catch on lol
When people that have no understanding of AI make a video about AI
They will not and stop making climate titles; Ai is just going to remove editors that only know to cut audio coloring is they improve they are 👍
.
Disagree.......to a point. Maybe in time but not soon.
The end is nigh
I am The First❤🎉