The wonders of God has been in classes for a very long time. Sunday school, church and Bible studies are in a classroom. Anytime we’re together and learning about Him is basically a class.
But you’re watching this series? I have read the Bible from cover to cover with other members of my church in a Bible study. I figure that whatever works for you is good. God gave us different abilities.
@@debschwartztrauber807 as you read the Bible from cover to cover ignorance is not your excuse. Now tell me how you accept the genocide, acceptance of slavery, inequality of women, and other gruesome details? Do you find it acceptable to stone your children if they do not obey you? Or to let them be mauled by a bear for mocking someone?
Question… At what point would we decide we’ve gone too far in discovering the traits that God has hidden inside a particular group of organisms? I’m picturing the different breeds of dogs that have actually been damaged by humans pushing the limits of certain traits. Is there a fine line, or is the line more obvious?
Thank you Dr Wise for all your efforts to share with us. It is so much appreciated... I have a small request, can you provide examples as much as possible (for us small-brained mammals), for instance when you talk about the hydlbridisation that occurs for thousands of years? I wasn't sure exactly what you were referring to and an example would really help me to understand better. It occurs to me that discontinuity is not necessarily against the naturalistic worldview, because evolution maintains that the fossil record is incomplete and will always be that way. This doesn't take away from any creationist argument, it just acknowledges that there are two world views and God has allowed this to be so, in order that we might express faith. (By faith we understand that the world is created). Since God's word is truth, the science will of course provide evidence for creation, however there is also evidence for an old earth and it can be seen why naturalists hold to evolution processes. I challenge you to continue to be a scientist at heart i.e ensure that you keep yourself in that "flashpoint" where evolution and creation collides... Because in this space God will give you answers. There are too many echo chambers (that of creation, and that of evolution), it is a trap that theologians and creationists can also fall into, once you hang out only with other creationists you forget how the "other side" thinks. Jesus spoke to all people in their language and met them where they were at. So possibly fulfilling your responsibility as a servant of the Lord He has given you gifts and a natural ability to speak to both believers and non-believers. Believers already believe, and we have so many theologians, what we are missing are scientists, men that do not disparage evolution, but show wisdom, compassion and understanding on why others believe as they do. Non-believers need help to see the flaws in their arguments, but this will only occur when understanding and patience is demonstrated. May God guide you in all things. I concur that all the genetic information must be contained in genomes. Thank you always for your work.
Evolution and abiogenesis’ are not really scientific as they cannot be repeated by human scientific experiments, they are promoted by lack of other interpretations.90% of known world is explained by virtue of belief not science, a mixture of known constants and deducted algorithms .A rivalry observed in life vs environment..Life most always conquers anything environment throws at it , it works well by hiding its agenda .
Life wants to adapt as much as it can ,,how does that happens nobody knows .The only way to truth is duplication .The rest are projections and projections on other projections ,lies built up on other lies . The will to live is not well a understood phenomena , those wanting to quit often enjoy plentiful of of what life offers and those in poor settings wont give up but strive for every second of it .Life strives on struggle not on lack of .
I am having trouble understanding what Dr. Kurt means by "hidden information"? Can someone explain this to me? I'm new to Baraminology, coming form a natrualism world view, and trying to understand it. What information exactly, and where is the information expressed? Does he mean information was hidden in the parent genes and is then expressed in the hybrid? If so, how is it hidden if it is now being expressed? Thanks!
Honourable people get accused of many things in speaking on behalf of the truth. I imagine you will be accused of knowing as little as the carpenter from Nazareth! I wouldn't be too disappointed.😊
And for the fourth time I request to show a Baramin. Which nobody on this channel has the ability to do. Similar to the endless diatribe about the properties of an imaginary almighty being, without eve being able to demonstrate its existence.
The Shadow, you wrote, "And for the fourth time I request to show a Baramin. Which nobody on this channel has the ability to do. Similar to the endless diatribe about the properties of an imaginary almighty being, without eve being able to demonstrate its existence." You could Google it, but that would interfere with your belligerent rant. Dan
The Shadow, you wrote, "@Bible Research Tools the advise to google means you do not know the answer. If you had one, you would be proudly presenting it." When I googled it, and it showed up as the top item and throughout the entire first page. It is also very easy to understand. But for the benefit of the reader, the definition of baramin is essentially the "kind" or type of organism that God created. He identified some of those, such as whales and cattle. From a scientific perspective, a baramin would typically fall in the family category, and sometimes in the genera, depending on how they are classified. For example, evolutionists have grouped humans with apes into the family of hominidae, which is nonsense. So, the humans would be a separate baramin. Dan
@@BibleResearchTools I am aware of what a baramin is defined as, however I request you to show two baramins that do not have biological ancestors. Humans do have a biological lineage, which means that example fails.
Hans De Mos, you wrote, "You said: "For example, evolutionists have grouped humans with apes into the family of hominidae, which is nonsense." Can you explain to me why that is nonsense according to you?" Frankly because there is zero evidence that humans and apes have a common ancestor, or that humans "evolved" from any organism other than another human. You are welcome to try to provide evidence for common ancestry, but you will not be able to. Dan
I always feel like I’m sitting in the classroom listening to you about the wonders of God. Thank you for this series.
The wonders of God do not belong in a classroom.
The wonders of God has been in classes for a very long time. Sunday school, church and Bible studies are in a classroom. Anytime we’re together and learning about Him is basically a class.
@@debschwartztrauber807 and I appreciate that they are in those places, though a reading from cover to cover would teach much more.
But you’re watching this series? I have read the Bible from cover to cover with other members of my church in a Bible study. I figure that whatever works for you is good. God gave us different abilities.
@@debschwartztrauber807 as you read the Bible from cover to cover ignorance is not your excuse. Now tell me how you accept the genocide, acceptance of slavery, inequality of women, and other gruesome details? Do you find it acceptable to stone your children if they do not obey you? Or to let them be mauled by a bear for mocking someone?
Dr. Wise reflects his name and thus he is a great teacher.
Outstanding. Many thanks for posting.
Great stuff.
What is the series name? I did not find in the playlist
Question… At what point would we decide we’ve gone too far in discovering the traits that God has hidden inside a particular group of organisms? I’m picturing the different breeds of dogs that have actually been damaged by humans pushing the limits of certain traits. Is there a fine line, or is the line more obvious?
Thank you Dr Wise for all your efforts to share with us. It is so much appreciated... I have a small request, can you provide examples as much as possible (for us small-brained mammals), for instance when you talk about the hydlbridisation that occurs for thousands of years? I wasn't sure exactly what you were referring to and an example would really help me to understand better. It occurs to me that discontinuity is not necessarily against the naturalistic worldview, because evolution maintains that the fossil record is incomplete and will always be that way. This doesn't take away from any creationist argument, it just acknowledges that there are two world views and God has allowed this to be so, in order that we might express faith. (By faith we understand that the world is created). Since God's word is truth, the science will of course provide evidence for creation, however there is also evidence for an old earth and it can be seen why naturalists hold to evolution processes. I challenge you to continue to be a scientist at heart i.e ensure that you keep yourself in that "flashpoint" where evolution and creation collides... Because in this space God will give you answers. There are too many echo chambers (that of creation, and that of evolution), it is a trap that theologians and creationists can also fall into, once you hang out only with other creationists you forget how the "other side" thinks. Jesus spoke to all people in their language and met them where they were at. So possibly fulfilling your responsibility as a servant of the Lord He has given you gifts and a natural ability to speak to both believers and non-believers. Believers already believe, and we have so many theologians, what we are missing are scientists, men that do not disparage evolution, but show wisdom, compassion and understanding on why others believe as they do. Non-believers need help to see the flaws in their arguments, but this will only occur when understanding and patience is demonstrated. May God guide you in all things. I concur that all the genetic information must be contained in genomes. Thank you always for your work.
Evolution and abiogenesis’ are not really scientific as they cannot be repeated by human scientific experiments, they are promoted by lack of other interpretations.90% of known world is explained by virtue of belief not science, a mixture of known constants and deducted algorithms .A rivalry observed in life vs environment..Life most always conquers anything environment throws at it , it works well by hiding its agenda .
Could the constant changes of the post flood world put pressure on kinds to adapt to these changes?
Life wants to adapt as much as it can ,,how does that happens nobody knows .The only way to truth is
duplication .The rest are projections and projections on other projections ,lies built up on other lies .
The will to live is not well a understood phenomena , those wanting to quit often enjoy plentiful of of what life offers and those in poor settings wont give up but strive for every second of it .Life strives on struggle not on lack of .
Absolutely mind blowing stuff. Wow. Thankyou
I am having trouble understanding what Dr. Kurt means by "hidden information"? Can someone explain this to me? I'm new to Baraminology, coming form a natrualism world view, and trying to understand it. What information exactly, and where is the information expressed? Does he mean information was hidden in the parent genes and is then expressed in the hybrid? If so, how is it hidden if it is now being expressed? Thanks!
Interesting.
There are no deep discontinuities. I challenge you to provide evidence of these discontinuities.
Honourable people get accused of many things in speaking on behalf of the truth.
I imagine you will be accused of knowing as little as the carpenter from Nazareth!
I wouldn't be too disappointed.😊
My most wittiest dilemma deceiver explainer through the Evolution Dogmatic systems , but also able to make bright light bulbs charged !
And for the fourth time I request to show a Baramin. Which nobody on this channel has the ability to do. Similar to the endless diatribe about the properties of an imaginary almighty being, without eve being able to demonstrate its existence.
The Shadow, you wrote, "And for the fourth time I request to show a Baramin. Which nobody on this channel has the ability to do. Similar to the endless diatribe about the properties of an imaginary almighty being, without eve being able to demonstrate its existence."
You could Google it, but that would interfere with your belligerent rant.
Dan
@@BibleResearchTools the advise to google means you do not know the answer. If you had one, you would be proudly presenting it.
The Shadow, you wrote, "@Bible Research Tools the advise to google means you do not know the answer. If you had one, you would be proudly presenting it."
When I googled it, and it showed up as the top item and throughout the entire first page. It is also very easy to understand. But for the benefit of the reader, the definition of baramin is essentially the "kind" or type of organism that God created. He identified some of those, such as whales and cattle. From a scientific perspective, a baramin would typically fall in the family category, and sometimes in the genera, depending on how they are classified. For example, evolutionists have grouped humans with apes into the family of hominidae, which is nonsense. So, the humans would be a separate baramin.
Dan
@@BibleResearchTools I am aware of what a baramin is defined as, however I request you to show two baramins that do not have biological ancestors. Humans do have a biological lineage, which means that example fails.
Hans De Mos, you wrote, "You said: "For example, evolutionists have grouped humans with apes into the family of hominidae, which is nonsense." Can you explain to me why that is nonsense according to you?"
Frankly because there is zero evidence that humans and apes have a common ancestor, or that humans "evolved" from any organism other than another human. You are welcome to try to provide evidence for common ancestry, but you will not be able to.
Dan
Tony Maurice , could you post proof of what you claim? It’s easy to accuse , where is your evidence?
Hard to imagine tomatoes, beetles and beavers having a common ancestor.
i guess Im kind of randomly asking but do anyone know of a good place to stream new movies online?
@Ephraim Carter Lately I have been using Flixzone. You can find it on google :)
@Enrique Kristian yup, been watching on FlixZone for months myself =)
@Enrique Kristian Thank you, I went there and it seems to work :) I really appreciate it !
@Ephraim Carter glad I could help =)
JESUS IS LORD