I used to work at the post office. We had at least one of them in our area. When he mailed a letter, instead of putting a zip code on it, he stamped the letter with a paragraph explaining why he didn’t have to use zip codes. I guess he believed he was striking back at “the man”, but all he was doing was increasing the chance of his letter being sent to the wrong place.🤡
@@sharkman5735The next step is to make another youtube vlog complaining about it and how he was actually right because reasons followed by smoking more meth.
Even better..they believe the laws don’t apply to them but they try to use quotes from the US constitution which is the LAW of the land. I was a cop from late 80’s to 2009 and I’m glad I never pulled over one of these lunatics who believe in Peter Pan and the Easter bunny
That happened once, the officer tugged the prosecutor's sleeve and said "but that's him though...what am I supposed to do?" The response he got was "well, if you know that's him, you know there's an outstanding arrest warrant for him, so go ahead and arrest him on the warrant once he exits the courthouse."
I agree- doesn’t failure to provide proper identification when requested by law enforcement get you put in jail. Same should be applied to these clowns in court.
@@mariannebonner2280only while driving, you aren't actually required to identify yourself unless an officer can articulate a crime he suspects you of commiting. Though testing that in the field should come with a warning lol
Judge: So you claim to be against the united states… then you are guilty of treason. That is an offence punishable with life imprisonment! Take him away officers!
I'm not sure if it's really "fighting the law". I mean, if I challenge you to a fight, but then spend most of the time punching myself in the face, did we really fight?
ive been saying for years, there is a very simple means of dealing with these fools. you call the case using the defendants name, & only the defendants name. if a person answering to that name isnt present, or a lawyer in good standing with your states BAR isnt present who is representing that name, you file a bench warrant , or a failure to appear.
Awhile back I saw this same judge tell a sovcit "well, sir, if you happen to see Mr. (insert idiots name) tell him that he has a bench warrant out for his arrest for failure to appear." 😂😂
They want all the benefits of being a US citizen and don't want to follow laws they don't agree with. Cool. The US has plenty of islands. Dedicate one to these idiots and let them live there, lawless, with no roads, no utilities, no help in a time of crisis. We won't miss them.
Sovereign citizens should be held under perjury, they claim sovereignty and then citizenship, so they are lying about their status one way or the other under oath… perjury
Being a sovereign citizen should be classified as a mental disorder. You know how delusional you have to be to think you write your own rules in a country of which you’re not the sole dictator of?😂
I agree. It must be related to schizophrenia. Like, I disagree with a ton of laws, but it's pretty easy to understand that the law is the law. The idea that knowing the magic words can get you out of jail because the police and court system's powers are illegitimate is mental illness. Even if the police and courts are illegitimate (I certainly think some of the things they do are) it doesn't matter. They have the backing of the US government. They get to decide what the law is. I wouldn't go to Afghanistan with a bottle of whiskey and then claim that me getting arrested is illegitimate. Unfair? Backwards? Sure, but whoever is the strongest in a country gets to decide what the law is. That's just how it works. At least in America, the people have a pretty strong say in what the law is. Just voted in my state to change 2 large laws, and if 60% of people agree with me, those laws will change. That sounds pretty legitimate to me.
This should've been an immediate bench warrant for failure to appear and the "attorney of fact" should've been arrested and held in contempt for practicing law without a license.
Yes, in TN, "Practice of law means the appearance as an advocate in a representative capacity ... in connection with proceedings pending or prospective before any court..." Practicing without a license is a Class A misdemeanor.
They call themselves "soverign" citizens; they are simply people who refuse to obey the laws of the land and don't want to held accountable. They have no special rights.
Makes me wonder what a SovCit does if 4 guys with Aks bust in at 3am and hold him at gunpoint. His place gets sacked or he gets shot. Then the SovCit does what? Calls the police I'll bet. To enforce the law which he believes does not apply to him.
@@helloidharbl6753Exactly. But you don't need to come up with such horror scenario to prove your point. Here, it was in the newspapers recently about an older sovereign citizen, who applied for his pension. The pension was denied because he does not aknowledge the state putting the law in place to entitle him to a pension in the first place. And as he does not accept the jurisdiction of the state, where does he file his complaint?
When I was in the USA for a year I ended up getting over 40k in covid fines and 20k in park fines. I did appear ok Camera from my home country. I was extremely patient explaining how I suspended the law and it didn't apply to me. I told the judge to shut up when he raised his voice.and that was the end of it. Many years later and no fine. I won
Oh, you're not the defendant? Then I guess the defendant isn't here. I'll just issue a bench warrant and we'll deal with that after the defendant is here.
Here, I fixed it for you. "Oh, you're not the defendant OR HIS, OR ANY KIND OF RECOGNIZED attorney AT ALL." Then go F#ck off. A licenced Attorney can appear in court on their client's behalf. . . but they need to really be a licensed Attorney.
When someone won't admit that what they are saying/doing is a load of crap even after being told why it is a load of crap and given an argument against it ( Mathew Aldridge did not appear ) using wiffy waffy words with no real meaning is pretty much all you can do before taking action against them.
I've been watching these videos for quite some time now in the beginning judges didn't really know what they were dealing with a lot of times first time they were seeing it. These people have lost the element of surprise
What you mean by "nonsense" approach.. Before "Appearing" let me ask you, Who is the Claimant.. And How "Claimant" (without representative) can stand and testify?? Simple question.. THEY ALL FICTIOUS..!!! STOCK of PAPER with Ink. Any Corporation is just Stock of Paper, Cannot HAVE Valid Contract, Cannot Talk, Cannot do Anything.. You just drawn in your fiction.. WHO IS THE "Injured Party" if One is Piece of Paper..??? Who is the "Witness", another Piece of Paper??? It's all BS, EVERYTHING.. UNLESS, there is REAL INJURED PARTY, that can TALK and WALK, Only these blood running, talking, walking can have a valid CLAIM!!! you Got it??? No magical, just simple logic.. It all commerce by the way. (claimed) GOV. should not involved in Any commerce or else its just another McDonalds.. And other BS "Sovern Citizen" - Oxymoronic TERM, which DOES not exists.. There is NO SUCH term.. ("plastic water") makes sense? NO. "CITIZEN" is property - fiction - systemic/corporate unit.. Cannot be "sovereign".. Can Police officer be Sovereign??? See what I mean.. Whoever spreading this BS, doing for purpose of misleading..
I love one I saw where some girl claimed she didn't have to have a driver's license and show it, because she was merely a 'traveler', and under the 'Articles of the Confederacy of 1834' she doesn't need permission to freely travel. She then argued with the police officer that he's stupid and didn't even know his own laws, LOL. Lady, cars weren't around in 1834, and you DO know that ANYTHING to do with the 'Confederacy' is null and void, right? ..... I mean, right?
Since Matthew didn't show up today, the judge should have revoked his bond and a warrant put out for him so he could sit in jail until the 8th of July.
@@introvertincognito4518 It cannot be taught as it is all pure nonsense and has no standing in any system of law. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either trying to scam you, is a liar or is stupid. Probably all three.
Technically yes, but actually no. So generally some judges, especially those not under scrutiny, tend to just say "Eh, whatever, throw this case out. It's not worth my time" basically, and the sovcits take this as a win on the merits of what they're saying, not just winning because the judge is annoyed and doesn't want to bother stretching things out with the risk of facetious appeals. A lot of "audit" channels tout these wins if you want to see why the sovcits seem so emboldened.
So I have to prove to you that people charge $ to teach people what I was talking about? Who are you? If I say people charge people to teach them self defense would you want documents? You must be a thrill to chat with. I can't prove that, it's just a hunch.
Because their is no real crime the Govt must attack a guy for saying the Govt is corrupt, lol. When did all of you become Soviet Clowns supporting this clown run govt?
Maybe don't let your political standings get in the way of ANY vote for ANY judge, because politics has very very little to do with the law, boomers just think it does.
@@joeaardvark9214 That's not really a just boomer thing though And it's terribly naive to think judges don't care about politics or don't have obvious biases
@@redrum47 There is not a single judge or DA alive who thinks to themselves "I'm gonna let this guy go because durrr I'm a lib-rull, durrrr." Please just stop.
@@joeaardvark9214 ", because politics has very very little to do with the law, boomers just think it does." Completely wrong. What if for example you had a judge who was a trumptard, and therefore a racist and bigot, and was always issuing unfavorable rulings to people of color? It matters. That's why judges are elected.
Not being in the US I have never even heard of this judge, but by crikey, he has earned my respect. Well done Sir. Now we all need other judges and similar to follow his lead.
So you are supporting the oppressors. Because this man is ignorant of the rules, proceedings in this court, doesn't mean that this judge is right. Nothing one man says grants him power over another man. It is as simple as that. Just because the judge wears a costume and swings a small pathetic wooden hammer, and sit in a chair up high, he is just another man. He may be smarter Higher I.Q. Have a bigger dick.etc. Doesn't matter. The only thing that this defendant did wrong was give up his rights believing in the spectacle
You will definitely not hear of other judges because they normally dismiss these cases from Sovereign Citizens once they start pulling stunts in Court.
Great judge. Very respectful and thorough. Way more patient than I would of been, lol. These type of citizens are totally unbelievable. Entertaining but absolutely insane. 😅
He can't do both, surely? If the Judge rules that the defendant has not appeared in court then it must follow that the person standing before him, allegedly acting as an attorney, cannot be the defendant because no one can be in two places at the same time.
Yes, he should threaten an innocent man with violence for showing up to a public place then government asked him to, and poorly defended himself. The founding fathers would be disgusted with you.
@@tonyoliver2750 Don't know if i can or can't but... Contempt for not appearing is done to individuals not appearing. If he goes with "acting as an attorney", he is going for the unnamed individual. He might have to drop one, when the defendant tells the court his name.
Wait. I don't think a sovereign citizen is capable of listening to other people...that's way too much to ask! I really like this Judge. I've not seen him before.
Yes, A true sovereign may not capable to listen to other people of the govern slave mentality. The Chosen are few. Didn't they threw Jesus in jail speaking the truth that the mass doesn't understand
Well they are only showing a special needs case. There are 5 million SC as they do not want much to do with the Anti-semitic N6zis in the IVey Leagues and Governments.🤣
I agree. I wonder if we have always had as many fruit cakes and just didn't know it because there was no internet to expose them or has the internet itself influenced people to go off the rails.
What I don't understand is how many of these "sovcits" actually win their case and walk away free? Without any evidence of such instances, what motivates people to continue to try this defense in court? Do they think they're going to be "the one" who finally succeeds where everyone else has failed?
It's just like people who think there's some special trick that let's you not pay taxes: there are simply millions of very stupid and ignorant people in the world
@Hammerman837 Idiot means a person of low intelligence. Anyone who thinks they can argue Soverign Citizen archaic law in court is, by definition, an idiot.
@@Hammerman837We’ll check out Webster’s…pretty sure your pic (and those of your father and his sister/wife) are right there next to the definition of idiot. 🤡 Additionally Forrest, if you think this group-think, pseudo law BS holds any legal weight at all, please explain why it’s never worked in court. Not once.
@@Hammerman837do you need help understanding what idiot means? Just in case, it means person of low intelligence or stupid. Pretty much sums up every SovCit.
The term "Sovereign Citizen" is a Oxymoron as one cannot simultaneously occupy the status of being a "Sovereign" and then at the very same time claim to be a "citizen." Usually the term gets thrown around as an erroneous label to describe someone (who usually doesn't know what the fuk they're talking about either) who has been spending way too much time watching a certain genre of UA-cam videos and has misinterpreted (or believed) what they've been watching to the point that they believe they have the ability and mental capacity to take on the state/federal governments and whether they do or don't have any historically legal ground to stand on, actually be victorious against such an entity while battling them upon said enemies home turf, which is in itself ludicrous of course. So you see ANYONE who use the term "Sovereign Citizen" whether it be to describe someone else, or themselves, is an absolute dumbass and has absolutely no clue wtf they're talking about. Period. 🦅🗽🇺🇲⚖️
The... freaking ... best! Love this judge! As an Australian, we see some SovCit clowns starting to trying it on down here, our ones are extra special because they try the same constitutional arguments here including trying to cite US case-law in Australia as if somehow we use the US legal system :D
Ah Australia the land of the corporate pseudo government pretenders. As far as Australia is concerned there is only one sovereign citizen and that was Queen Elizabeth II as she became in 1972 a sovereign citizen of a State of the European Union while being the sovereign of the United Kingdom and its realms, of which Australia is via clause 2 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK. The only "clowns" in Australia are the one's pretending to be Judicial officers unable to create a PROPER court order of course while operating a Star Chamber. US Supreme court cases can be used in Australia, I think you had better take a look at the annotation to the Constitution to confirm that in fact Australian people can use US Supreme court precedents for the purpose of highlighting precedent not yet covered in Australian jurisprudence. Of course the defendant in this case failed to present himself properly but this does show that in fact these arguments are a sign of a desperate population attempting to get back a proper form of governance which has been deteriorating over that past 100 years into the cesspool we are left with today.
I'm sure it's because they download the fake legal documents from the internet. They can't understand it, but magical thinking is all they've got. It's *almost* funny.
Ah the UK which handed itself over to Rome in 1948 and as such has been under Roman law incorporating the Roman slave system of governance via the "person".@@ukdave57
Love it. Shut it all down quick smart. The judge is in charge of the courtroom. Citisens can access the court, but you have to know and understand the rules. Most people don't, which is why you get an actual attorney.
Or one will be appointed to you - this protects the courts from any accusations of wrong doing concerning the legal system as well as the plaintiff AND defendant. It's embarrassing we still have people with such low education.
Brilliant. I have a hunch that this guy came to court expecting a heated debate, and was looking for a judge to play the belligerent autocrat to his righteous dissident. Sorry, Mr. Timmy McVeigh, Jr.! With the supreme unflappability of a lifelong public servant, he *thoroughly* dismantles this man’s delusions of revolutionary grandeur and then sends his ass packing. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Give that judge a cigar! (But what if he doesn't smoke?) Then give that judge a beer! (But what if he doesn't drink?) Then give that judge a hearty round of applause! I'm sure he won't mind.
At least you’re not issuing demands that he be given a raise for doing his job (or the converse, which is that he should be fired, investigated for corruption, and imprisoned for making a decision you don’t like). Sure, give him a cigar or a beer or applause. But if it was me that was the judge, I’d want a cookie. A peanut butter cookie. I can’t tell you how long it’s been since I’ve had a good peanut butter cookie.
Why can't this charade just be a mandatory 5 year minimum sentence? It is a waste of everyone's time and says this person has no intent to ever abide by any law and therefore they do not need to be out in public with people that do.
Your thinking is what got this country to where it is now...thats a liberal attitude...throw their ass in jail because he has an opinion and doesnt like his rights violated.
What a wonderful Judge who knows exactly what it’s all about. That’s all I can say because I don’t know a thing about the law except to keep clear of wrong doing!
That the judge, DAVID D. WOLFE, a civil servant who spent many years in law school studying the complex and fair laws made by MANY others who did the same has the patience for this idiot is beyond comprehension! He could have just gotten angry and tossed this guy in a jail cell but rather this goes to show you that the personal power of such an authority is still humble, patient, and caring with the citizens that he encounters in the courtroom. I have very much appreciation for this judge. God bless him!
I think Judge Simpson nailed it. He told defendant you're practicing law w/o a lic, that's felony punishable up to 4 yrs, do you want to continue, ok let me get a prosecutor in here..........he was done!!
@@hauntedshadowslegacy2826 yeah, but what OP here is talking about is an entire different case and judge. And it is worded like the judge told the defendant that he couldn't self represent without committing a felony.
What gets me is that these Sovcits walk into the courtroom believing that their words are going to "shock and awe" the judge and win the day. No. This stuff was old 100 years ago. Every court and every judge has seen it before multiple times and knows how to deal with it. I don't know anything about Judge Wolfe but I'm sure he's gone to law school, passed the BAR exam, was a lawyer for 10+ years and has been a judge for 10+ years. He's not going to be wowed by a sloppy document written by an "attorney of fact." Or by any Sovcit challenging jurisdiction or yelling out supreme court cases. Nope, not happening. Get a real lawyer, kids. I'm with others here who say that the moment this guy refused to state his name the judge should have told him to sit down and immediately issued a bench warrant. Maybe a week in jail will help him remember his name.
They mostly think they have rights that will be upheld. No democrat believes in human rights, and half of every body else generally fears rights and wants them stifled
If your elected representative kneels on the house floor and speaks in tongues, then that representative is the political equivalent of a sovereign citizen.
I love this judge!!! I used to watch his feed a lot, just haven't in a while. But I love how he treats the lawyers, he is always quick to tell stories, give guidance; teach little lessons. He was judge for a mock educational trial (its a must watch). He has a great amount of patients, which must be a must for judges. Of course as seen here he is just great at dealing with all kinds. Loved this clip, thank you!
These guys remind me of guys who buy online training on how to pick up women. The training tells you a bunch of lines that are guaranteed to get women to go out with you. Then they show vignettes of someone using the lines, and the women always respond according to the script and agree to date the guy. Then the guy tries it in the real world and the women look at him like he's nuts. There are no shortcuts in important matters in life. If it seems too good to believe, that's because it's not real.
It baffles me how people appear in court and refuse to identify themselves, live in a country but refuse to recognize it and abide by the laws of that country, while at the same time probably taking all the benefits and relief from the government they fail to respect.
This was pure gold! I am in awe how this amazing judge managed the charade of the so called "lawyer". 😂 The judge was like this is my court and I don't play games. Here... this is what we came here to do, make a note of the date and keep walking. ❤ Yeap. My respects to the judge.
I caught the judge holding back a glimmer of a smile at the beginning of this discussion. He knew what was coming and was calm and fully prepared. And the judges evidently knows his Latin…..plus he knows he has a camera on him so …… drum roll……hammer down. Waste of time and space Judge Wolfe. Thank you for naming this and mambo jumbo! So true.
The judge should have taken the obvious stance that that was Matthew Aldridge, charged him with contempt of court and attempting to defraud the court, revoked his bond, and tossed him in jail where he belonged.
No , but they do get their charges dismissed a lot mainly because the courts don't want to deal with them, and many of their cases are barely misdemeanors. I wish they would stop dismissing the charges and just give them the business. Let them learn some life lessons
The difference between someone who thinks they know the law vs someone who actually knows the law.
It’s not the law it’s the person making the interpretation
Doesn't matter if you know some other group of mens rules.
They have no powers over other men.
Go pound sand.
@@fattyz1 The interpretation is backed by previous case law, not on a whim at the moment.
Suggesting thinking is taking place is hilarious.
Well s@id!
Every sovcit ever: "Why aren't the magic words working???"
Why do the weirdo people all babble meaningless garbage?
@@sadjaxx Well, it works on the weak and stupid, which seems to describe the other folk in their life space.
I used to work at the post office. We had at least one of them in our area. When he mailed a letter, instead of putting a zip code on it, he stamped the letter with a paragraph explaining why he didn’t have to use zip codes.
I guess he believed he was striking back at “the man”, but all he was doing was increasing the chance of his letter being sent to the wrong place.🤡
For the same reason that prayers are never answered.
That grifter must have sold you a faulty spell scroll.
Here, I have one I can give you for $500, and it comes with the necessary ink and paper!
Back to mom’s basement and figure out the next step.
I don't believe there is another step. The judge is not tolerating any of this crap.
Damn that’s funny
They’re just waiting for US currency to become banned. Apparently we ‘haven’t had money’ in a number of decades.
lol!
@@sharkman5735The next step is to make another youtube vlog complaining about it and how he was actually right because reasons followed by smoking more meth.
They don't recognize the government, but accept money from the government.
AND still carries a Social Security Card !!!!
Even better..they believe the laws don’t apply to them but they try to use quotes from the US constitution which is the LAW of the land. I was a cop from late 80’s to 2009 and I’m glad I never pulled over one of these lunatics who believe in Peter Pan and the Easter bunny
Of course. Scumbags
and free health insurance.
And demand Constitutional protections
The Judge should have set a Bench Warrant for Failure to Appear.
He's trying not to feed into their persecution complex.
That happened once, the officer tugged the prosecutor's sleeve and said "but that's him though...what am I supposed to do?" The response he got was "well, if you know that's him, you know there's an outstanding arrest warrant for him, so go ahead and arrest him on the warrant once he exits the courthouse."
I agree- doesn’t failure to provide proper identification when requested by law enforcement get you put in jail. Same should be applied to these clowns in court.
@@mariannebonner2280only while driving, you aren't actually required to identify yourself unless an officer can articulate a crime he suspects you of commiting. Though testing that in the field should come with a warning lol
Judge: So you claim to be against the united states… then you are guilty of treason. That is an offence punishable with life imprisonment! Take him away officers!
He fought the law, and the law won! This never gets old!
I'm not sure if it's really "fighting the law". I mean, if I challenge you to a fight, but then spend most of the time punching myself in the face, did we really fight?
@@johnmcclure40😂
bootlicker
@@bry84guy found Mr I Don't Have a Name.
How is not being a loser a bootlicker?
ive been saying for years, there is a very simple means of dealing with these fools. you call the case using the defendants name, & only the defendants name. if a person answering to that name isnt present, or a lawyer in good standing with your states BAR isnt present who is representing that name, you file a bench warrant , or a failure to appear.
Judge Wolf is SOLID❤
Judge Bryant does the exact same. If you're not the person named on the docket then be quiet and I'm issuing a bench warrant. We're done !
Awhile back I saw this same judge tell a sovcit "well, sir, if you happen to see Mr. (insert idiots name) tell him that he has a bench warrant out for his arrest for failure to appear." 😂😂
100%
I've seen judges do this before; usually the sov does a 180
There is no pill or cure for stupidity!
Even duct tape cannot fix this stupidity
There is one cure...😮
There actually IS a cure for stupidity, but it's painful in the extreme.
@@gram247, but it will muffle the sound.
The cure is education....
The fact these people try this in court is hilarious, it always ends up the same
No, it's insane and a waste of our court's time!!!
I've seen them win.
@@Theadvocate-w6c Bull5hit! Cite a case where they "WON" and it wasn't dropped or plead out.
@@Theadvocate-w6c No you haven't.
@@Theadvocate-w6c no you haven't
This judge was awesome. This is how all these sovereign citizen fools should be handled.
They want all the benefits of being a US citizen and don't want to follow laws they don't agree with. Cool. The US has plenty of islands. Dedicate one to these idiots and let them live there, lawless, with no roads, no utilities, no help in a time of crisis. We won't miss them.
Sovereign citizens should be held under perjury, they claim sovereignty and then citizenship, so they are lying about their status one way or the other under oath… perjury
He spent too long on the case. Should've just said "If Matthew Aldridge is not here, then I will be issuing a bench warrant for his arrest."
Being a sovereign citizen should be classified as a mental disorder. You know how delusional you have to be to think you write your own rules in a country of which you’re not the sole dictator of?😂
I agree. It must be related to schizophrenia. Like, I disagree with a ton of laws, but it's pretty easy to understand that the law is the law.
The idea that knowing the magic words can get you out of jail because the police and court system's powers are illegitimate is mental illness. Even if the police and courts are illegitimate (I certainly think some of the things they do are) it doesn't matter. They have the backing of the US government. They get to decide what the law is.
I wouldn't go to Afghanistan with a bottle of whiskey and then claim that me getting arrested is illegitimate. Unfair? Backwards? Sure, but whoever is the strongest in a country gets to decide what the law is. That's just how it works.
At least in America, the people have a pretty strong say in what the law is. Just voted in my state to change 2 large laws, and if 60% of people agree with me, those laws will change. That sounds pretty legitimate to me.
If you classify SC as disorder then you also have to classify stupidity as such.
And there aren't nearly enough asylums for all the stupids.
The judge in my county, which is 80 miles from this one, tears these idiots up all the time. It never gets old watching it happen. lol
I bet those judges get together and laugh it up about these idiots who claim Sovereign Citizen.
"What is your name"
"I don't have a name "
Brilliant.
The criminal justice system HATES this one simple trick!
“I was never given a name.” - Michael Scott
I am the called "I am". Beginning to think that didn't work for Moses the way they say it did in that book.
Place Mr. Aldridge in jail until he ID's himself how every long that takes.
@@butterw55
Oh my gosh. 😂😂😂😂
This should've been an immediate bench warrant for failure to appear and the "attorney of fact" should've been arrested and held in contempt for practicing law without a license.
I've seen a few judges do just that!
Yes, in TN, "Practice of law means the appearance as an advocate in a representative capacity ... in connection with proceedings pending or prospective before any court..." Practicing without a license is a Class A misdemeanor.
I agree 100%
The only benefit of the doubt given would be if he has been duped into thinking that this rubbish is truthful 😂
I think any competent attourney should be able to get such charges thrown out... Which means they have no hope unless they wise up fast.
He conceded he was not an attorney but not the accused.
Hardly thinking on his feet.
Me: "Tell me your name or I'll find you in contempt of court and file a bench warrant for Matthew Aldradge for failing to appear."
Most brilliant sovcit shutdown ever.
That would have been perfect. I doubt the guy had any idea this is what could have happened and he actually was given a break.
Absolutely beautiful.
@GraniteRidge *Their
Why make such a power move? The Judge probably just made up the conflict, so this young man has another chance to come to his senses.
Smooth and succinct. That judge has a way with words and situational calmness that is amazing.
They call themselves "soverign" citizens; they are simply people who refuse to obey the laws of the land and don't want to held accountable. They have no special rights.
Or to put it more clearly: They want all the rights and none of the laws.
Makes me wonder what a SovCit does if 4 guys with Aks bust in at 3am and hold him at gunpoint. His place gets sacked or he gets shot.
Then the SovCit does what? Calls the police I'll bet. To enforce the law which he believes does not apply to him.
@@helloidharbl6753Exactly. But you don't need to come up with such horror scenario to prove your point. Here, it was in the newspapers recently about an older sovereign citizen, who applied for his pension. The pension was denied because he does not aknowledge the state putting the law in place to entitle him to a pension in the first place.
And as he does not accept the jurisdiction of the state, where does he file his complaint?
When I was in the USA for a year I ended up getting over 40k in covid fines and 20k in park fines. I did appear ok Camera from my home country. I was extremely patient explaining how I suspended the law and it didn't apply to me. I told the judge to shut up when he raised his voice.and that was the end of it. Many years later and no fine. I won
They try and use the US Constitution to protect their WRONGS and not necessarily their rights.
Oh, you're not the defendant? Then I guess the defendant isn't here. I'll just issue a bench warrant and we'll deal with that after the defendant is here.
Here, I fixed it for you.
"Oh, you're not the defendant OR HIS, OR ANY KIND OF RECOGNIZED attorney AT ALL."
Then go F#ck off.
A licenced Attorney can appear in court on their client's behalf. . . but they need to really be a licensed Attorney.
Well that's simple enough for me to understand.
@@jairushughes2884 The sov cit would just about be able to make it to the street before being arrested. A number of charges present themselves.
You’re not a judge. You wish tho.
@@naaauurI'm willing to bet you're a sovereign citizen.
Happy to see the judge put a stop to the nonsense.
That person who failed to identify should have been held in contempt for playing games with the court.
"mumbo Jumbo" 😂😂😂 well said Judge
😂😂😂😂
or he used nice words or he watches mumbo jumbo on minecraft :P
When someone won't admit that what they are saying/doing is a load of crap even after being told why it is a load of crap and given an argument against it ( Mathew Aldridge did not appear ) using wiffy waffy words with no real meaning is pretty much all you can do before taking action against them.
Also known as Bovine Scatology.
This is how ALL judges should be! Mad respect for you sir. God bless you
Judicial mic drop.
Definitely seeing more judges adopting a no nonsense approach to these idiots and I'm here for it!
Well said! 👍
You just said "Judicial mic drop" and have changed my world forever lol LMAO
I'm glad this Judge doesn't go back and forth with this Sovereign Citizen foolishness. Good job Judge.
I've been watching these videos for quite some time now in the beginning judges didn't really know what they were dealing with a lot of times first time they were seeing it. These people have lost the element of surprise
What you mean by "nonsense" approach.. Before "Appearing" let me ask you, Who is the Claimant.. And How "Claimant" (without representative) can stand and testify?? Simple question.. THEY ALL FICTIOUS..!!! STOCK of PAPER with Ink. Any Corporation is just Stock of Paper, Cannot HAVE Valid Contract, Cannot Talk, Cannot do Anything.. You just drawn in your fiction.. WHO IS THE "Injured Party" if One is Piece of Paper..??? Who is the "Witness", another Piece of Paper??? It's all BS, EVERYTHING.. UNLESS, there is REAL INJURED PARTY, that can TALK and WALK, Only these blood running, talking, walking can have a valid CLAIM!!! you Got it??? No magical, just simple logic.. It all commerce by the way. (claimed) GOV. should not involved in Any commerce or else its just another McDonalds.. And other BS "Sovern Citizen" - Oxymoronic TERM, which DOES not exists.. There is NO SUCH term.. ("plastic water") makes sense? NO. "CITIZEN" is property - fiction - systemic/corporate unit.. Cannot be "sovereign".. Can Police officer be Sovereign??? See what I mean.. Whoever spreading this BS, doing for purpose of misleading..
Loved the “you can take your piece of paper and go on about your business “ comment from the judge.
"Is this an Article III trial?" When these guys use legal phrases you can tell they have no idea what they are talking about.
I love one I saw where some girl claimed she didn't have to have a driver's license and show it, because she was merely a 'traveler', and under the 'Articles of the Confederacy of 1834' she doesn't need permission to freely travel. She then argued with the police officer that he's stupid and didn't even know his own laws, LOL. Lady, cars weren't around in 1834, and you DO know that ANYTHING to do with the 'Confederacy' is null and void, right? ..... I mean, right?
And. “1834”?
Since Matthew didn't show up today, the judge should have revoked his bond and a warrant put out for him so he could sit in jail until the 8th of July.
Make that July 32nd.
@@michaelcauser474 Leap Year and all
"You need to take your piece of paper and go on about your business." **GOLD**
Oh that part made my day! Lol
"go on about your business" was a polite way of saying "shove it up your bum".
And what is your business, Sir?
I'm uh...unemployed
Has this EVER ONCE worked out positively for the SOVIdiot? Just once? No. So, why do they do it?
Their patron saint is Saul Goodman
There are people who charge to teach you exactly how to do it but "It takes time, paperwork, research, passport." You can't just come in with claims
@@introvertincognito4518 It cannot be taught as it is all pure nonsense and has no standing in any system of law. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either trying to scam you, is a liar or is stupid. Probably all three.
Technically yes, but actually no.
So generally some judges, especially those not under scrutiny, tend to just say "Eh, whatever, throw this case out. It's not worth my time" basically, and the sovcits take this as a win on the merits of what they're saying, not just winning because the judge is annoyed and doesn't want to bother stretching things out with the risk of facetious appeals.
A lot of "audit" channels tout these wins if you want to see why the sovcits seem so emboldened.
So I have to prove to you that people charge $ to teach people what I was talking about? Who are you? If I say people charge people to teach them self defense would you want documents? You must be a thrill to chat with. I can't prove that, it's just a hunch.
OMG,, this was priceless!! We need more judges like that in Wayne County. We have a few of them just not enough😊
the one’s I’ve seen in Wayne are waaay obnoxious and judge Wolfe would hold em in contempt in about 30 seconds Cindy!
Because their is no real crime the Govt must attack a guy for saying the Govt is corrupt, lol. When did all of you become Soviet Clowns supporting this clown run govt?
Just a reflection of all these crazies in the whole state of Michigan..
Govern me harder daddy😂
Regardless of my political standings, i would vote for this judge on this case alone
Maybe don't let your political standings get in the way of ANY vote for ANY judge, because politics has very very little to do with the law, boomers just think it does.
@@joeaardvark9214 That's not really a just boomer thing though
And it's terribly naive to think judges don't care about politics or don't have obvious biases
@@redrum47 There is not a single judge or DA alive who thinks to themselves "I'm gonna let this guy go because durrr I'm a lib-rull, durrrr." Please just stop.
@@joeaardvark9214
", because politics has very very little to do with the law, boomers just think it does."
Completely wrong. What if for example you had a judge who was a trumptard, and therefore a racist and bigot, and was always issuing unfavorable rulings to people of color?
It matters. That's why judges are elected.
@@joeaardvark9214 The idea of judges being party political appointees fills me with horror.
Option A: Appear in court
Option B: Get yourself a bench warrant _and_ get sued for being a fake attorney on the same day
Sued by whom? Suing someone is a civil matter. It is a crime to practice law without a license, but the District Attorney or Judge cannot sue anyone.
@@lonewolf4429 So you clearly understood what I meant, yet choose to ignore it anyway?
Nice try, Forrest. Now go back to your coloring book and try not to eat all the crayons … again. 🤡
This judge handled this beautifully. I hope other judges watched this.❤
Not being in the US I have never even heard of this judge, but by crikey, he has earned my respect. Well done Sir. Now we all need other judges and similar to follow his lead.
So you are supporting the oppressors.
Because this man is ignorant of the rules, proceedings in this court, doesn't mean that this judge is right.
Nothing one man says grants him power over another man.
It is as simple as that.
Just because the judge wears a costume and swings a small pathetic wooden hammer, and sit in a chair up high, he is just another man.
He may be smarter Higher I.Q.
Have a bigger dick.etc.
Doesn't matter.
The only thing that this defendant did wrong was give up his rights believing in the spectacle
@@controltherandomness9105... another person who reads Ayn Rand while drinking malt liquor.
Oh I say… by crikey!
You will definitely not hear of other judges because they normally dismiss these cases from Sovereign Citizens once they start pulling stunts in Court.
@@Trollspeil Congratulations, you have started to learn how to speak Strine. Sorry, Australian.
Great judge. Very respectful and thorough. Way more patient than I would of been, lol. These type of citizens are totally unbelievable. Entertaining but absolutely insane. 😅
He should threaten to hold him in contempt for not appearing AND for acting as an attorney without a license.
He can't do both, surely? If the Judge rules that the defendant has not appeared in court then it must follow that the person standing before him, allegedly acting as an attorney, cannot be the defendant because no one can be in two places at the same time.
Yes, he should threaten an innocent man with violence for showing up to a public place then government asked him to, and poorly defended himself.
The founding fathers would be disgusted with you.
@@tonyoliver2750
Don't know if i can or can't but... Contempt for not appearing is done to individuals not appearing.
If he goes with "acting as an attorney", he is going for the unnamed individual.
He might have to drop one, when the defendant tells the court his name.
Contempt for not appearing might not stick, but contempt for disrespecting the judge and disrupting court proceedings would.
He handled it exactly the right way… love it
This is exactly how this type of sovereign citizen case should be called out and handled.
Why don't all the sovereign citizens get together and start their own country and leave everyone else alone?
Straight answer: because they want the rights and services that only a civilized society provides, without the responsibilities that go with it.
@@jpolowin0 exactly
I think they should be placed on a deserted island, like the show "Survivor"!
@@jpolowin0Let the church say Amen. They want paved roads to "travel" on.
They can't because there is no territory on earth big government doesn't claim as their own and demand property taxes to live on.
There's nothing in the world quite like a good, southern "Do what now?"
Is the reply... the 2 what?what? The 2 Utes?
😆
@@notme2day Sorry your honor.
YOOOOTTTHHHES.
Yep! You know they heard what you said but they are trying to give you a chance to correct yourself, lol!
can you update this case pls love this judge
It wouldn't have surprised me to hear "Well, bless your heart."
Wait. I don't think a sovereign citizen is capable of listening to other people...that's way too much to ask!
I really like this Judge. I've not seen him before.
Ditto that.
He has a UA-cam channel! He’s my favorite. Judge David Wolfe
The use of [the] term, "sovereign citizen" shows how little you currently know or understand. _* Ooo~ Sorry*_
@@stanleypoe7393 just because it triggers you doesn't mean it's any less correct than the people pretending otherwise.
Yes, A true sovereign may not capable to listen to other people of the govern slave mentality. The Chosen are few. Didn't they threw Jesus in jail speaking the truth that the mass doesn't understand
Finally a judge with balls!
If these fools really believed they were sovereign citizens they’d never show up for court in the first place.
Yep! Just what I commented.
They just want to show how clever they are lol
Sovereign citizen
Accomplished their goal avoiding court.
Well they are only showing a special needs case. There are 5 million SC as they do not want much to do with the Anti-semitic N6zis in the IVey Leagues and Governments.🤣
They want their own rules, put them on an island. See how long I can do what I want last
And thats how its done! No BS no wasted time. Thank you for posting
thanks to my friend GP for lettin me know about it!
Complete waste of time...his whole life.
I love this judge..l can see him going home to his wife saying..Honey you just wouldn't believe the prat l saw in court today😂...
What's a prat??
@@stevegiu4232an idiot !
That probably happens every day when you're a judge ! I'd like to have a beer or two with him just to hear some of the stories he has to tell !
@@averteddisasterbarely2339 Yeah..l bet he has some doozies too
@@stevegiu4232prat is an idiot
I was waiting for the Judge to say “Bless your heart”.
Judge....Take this piece of paper and go about your business..what a gentlemanly way to say...stick it up your......
I laughed out loud at that. What the Judge said and meant was instantly clear! I vote #1 Judge comment of the day.
@@carolbabb7875 Its a pity judges cant make law at the bench... oh well... when you put on a show because your desperate...anything goes i suppose...
Judge told him to fly a kite 😂
The judge is giving him another chance to show up. and fly right. He comes again with his weirdo stuff and he is going to jail.
😂😂
I love it! The judge is having none of this guy's pseudo-legal nonsense.
Seems like the US is just becoming a nation of fruitcakes day by day. May be some hope with Judges like this one.
And not many like fruitcake.
I agree. I wonder if we have always had as many fruit cakes and just didn't know it because there was no internet to expose them or has the internet itself influenced people to go off the rails.
Nah, it always has been. We're just seeing it Thee UA-cams et al.
The biggest fruitcake is Donald Trump
What I don't understand is how many of these "sovcits" actually win their case and walk away free? Without any evidence of such instances, what motivates people to continue to try this defense in court? Do they think they're going to be "the one" who finally succeeds where everyone else has failed?
For people with a certain level of education or intelligence: this "freeman of the land" stuff is very attractive.
It's just like people who think there's some special trick that let's you not pay taxes: there are simply millions of very stupid and ignorant people in the world
Absolutely epic sovcit shut down. Great example of how those idiots need to be handled in court
Do you know what idiot means?
@Hammerman837 Idiot means a person of low intelligence. Anyone who thinks they can argue Soverign Citizen archaic law in court is, by definition, an idiot.
@@Hammerman837We’ll check out Webster’s…pretty sure your pic (and those of your father and his sister/wife) are right there next to the definition of idiot. 🤡
Additionally Forrest, if you think this group-think, pseudo law BS holds any legal weight at all, please explain why it’s never worked in court. Not once.
@@Hammerman837do you need help understanding what idiot means? Just in case, it means person of low intelligence or stupid. Pretty much sums up every SovCit.
You think his guy actually learned anything? He probably thought he won this, based on the fact the trial date was postponed.
Judge Wolfe!! He's practices where I grew up in Tennessee. Good guy. I watch his criminal days in case I find someone I went to High School with 😂
he is an awesome judge!
I've noticed that Tennessee doesn't play soverign games. Even their LEOs don't play it either.
The term "Sovereign Citizen" is a Oxymoron as one cannot simultaneously occupy the status of being a "Sovereign" and then at the very same time claim to be a "citizen." Usually the term gets thrown around as an erroneous label to describe someone (who usually doesn't know what the fuk they're talking about either) who has been spending way too much time watching a certain genre of UA-cam videos and has misinterpreted (or believed) what they've been watching to the point that they believe they have the ability and mental capacity to take on the state/federal governments and whether they do or don't have any historically legal ground to stand on, actually be victorious against such an entity while battling them upon said enemies home turf, which is in itself ludicrous of course.
So you see ANYONE who use the term "Sovereign Citizen" whether it be to describe someone else, or themselves, is an absolute dumbass and has absolutely no clue wtf they're talking about. Period. 🦅🗽🇺🇲⚖️
@@Grim-PrepperJudge Wolfe doesn't suffer fools who spend $200 for a Sovidiot defense grounded in 1775 British law.
love this judge wish alljudges were educated with his knowledge
I nominate this Judge for the first Annual Sovie Awards. Give this judge the trophy for the best Sovcit shutdown of 2024.😅
MagD5, the year just began, let's see what happens first, but I love your energy!
Sovereign citizens do not deserve any rights in this country.
They have the same right as the rest of us. And that's all. No special rights as "sovereign citizens" because there's no such thing.
Bravo Judge... 👏👏👏I'm glad Judges are not going for this and putting a stop to this quickly.
Yes M, Seems more and more as soon as they realize what they are dealing with they come down hard on them.
@@baobo67As they should. They are wasting court time, and, costing the taxpayers money.
The... freaking ... best! Love this judge!
As an Australian, we see some SovCit clowns starting to trying it on down here, our ones are extra special because they try the same constitutional arguments here including trying to cite US case-law in Australia as if somehow we use the US legal system :D
Ditto the UK 😂
Ah Australia the land of the corporate pseudo government pretenders. As far as Australia is concerned there is only one sovereign citizen and that was Queen Elizabeth II as she became in 1972 a sovereign citizen of a State of the European Union while being the sovereign of the United Kingdom and its realms, of which Australia is via clause 2 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK.
The only "clowns" in Australia are the one's pretending to be Judicial officers unable to create a PROPER court order of course while operating a Star Chamber.
US Supreme court cases can be used in Australia, I think you had better take a look at the annotation to the Constitution to confirm that in fact Australian people can use US Supreme court precedents for the purpose of highlighting precedent not yet covered in Australian jurisprudence.
Of course the defendant in this case failed to present himself properly but this does show that in fact these arguments are a sign of a desperate population attempting to get back a proper form of governance which has been deteriorating over that past 100 years into the cesspool we are left with today.
I'm sure it's because they download the fake legal documents from the internet. They can't understand it, but magical thinking is all they've got. It's *almost* funny.
There is a case where a US citizen tried it in London UK. He got shown what the inside of a British police station cell looks like.
Ah the UK which handed itself over to Rome in 1948 and as such has been under Roman law incorporating the Roman slave system of governance via the "person".@@ukdave57
I love how these people choose a defense tactic that has no constitutional basis and has never worked a single time in the history of its use.
Sadly it does work sometimes, police and courtrooms get tired of talking in circles with them. 🤦Good on this judge not to give in.
@@Chip_GardenerNot one instance of it working in a U.S. court.
"Listen to me, instead of talking." I love this judge. And he didn't even lose his temper at this Sovereign Dummy.
Love it. Shut it all down quick smart. The judge is in charge of the courtroom. Citisens can access the court, but you have to know and understand the rules. Most people don't, which is why you get an actual attorney.
Or one will be appointed to you - this protects the courts from any accusations of wrong doing concerning the legal system as well as the plaintiff AND defendant. It's embarrassing we still have people with such low education.
“He whose name must not be uttered”. This judge is a closet Harry Potter fan. 😂😂😂
ROFLMAO....
No, it is in fact a reference to Rumpole Of The Bailey, a book series about a barrister in London.
I’m pretty sure if he was a closet harry potter fan he wouldn’t have said that, jeremy
Read another book jesus christ, then you might spot age-old phrases
I was thinking more like “the knights who until recently were called nee”
Who is he? Voldemort? He whose name must not be uttered. 🙄
hilarious huh?
🤣😂😁👏
🤭
😂
The horrifying thing is, the Sovcit thinks he won…
Brilliant. I have a hunch that this guy came to court expecting a heated debate, and was looking for a judge to play the belligerent autocrat to his righteous dissident. Sorry, Mr. Timmy McVeigh, Jr.! With the supreme unflappability of a lifelong public servant, he *thoroughly* dismantles this man’s delusions of revolutionary grandeur and then sends his ass packing. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
That one doesn't even seem bright enough to understand and run the sovcit script, let alone understand and reply to the Judge telling him off for it.
Give that judge a cigar! (But what if he doesn't smoke?) Then give that judge a beer! (But what if he doesn't drink?) Then give that judge a hearty round of applause! I'm sure he won't mind.
At least you’re not issuing demands that he be given a raise for doing his job (or the converse, which is that he should be fired, investigated for corruption, and imprisoned for making a decision you don’t like). Sure, give him a cigar or a beer or applause. But if it was me that was the judge, I’d want a cookie. A peanut butter cookie. I can’t tell you how long it’s been since I’ve had a good peanut butter cookie.
@@MarcosElMalo2this comment didn’t go where I was expecting, but I was pleasantly surprised. Go get a cookie!
Detail his car...lol
❤
@@emilyasciolla9851oh dear, to be presently surprised! On this midafternoon monday morning! Ur sooo weird TF
Why can't this charade just be a mandatory 5 year minimum sentence? It is a waste of everyone's time and says this person has no intent to ever abide by any law and therefore they do not need to be out in public with people that do.
@Nick-wn1xw We are footing a lot more bills for a lot less in return.
So your solution is we're paying a bunch of money for B's so we should pay a lot more for more bs.
False name to the court; threatening officer; threatening court officers, AND MAYBE, attempt to overthrow the govt, same as Jan 6.
Your thinking is what got this country to where it is now...thats a liberal attitude...throw their ass in jail because he has an opinion and doesnt like his rights violated.
@@davidbaughman6323 Pretending you are some immune member of some imaginary citizenry = opinion. Good one.
When the Judge is so much smarter and better educated than the soviet citizen, you, junior are doomed.
But, aren’t they always?
@@joycef8443 Even a loaf of bread is, but you get the point.
Sovereign not soviet..
Soviet 🤣🤣🤣
Sovereign not Soviet😂
Love it! He should be teaching all the other judges how to deal with these people.
RESPECT ! Judge is one sharp guy.
What a wonderful Judge who knows exactly what it’s all about. That’s all I can say because I don’t know a thing about the law except to keep clear of wrong doing!
I wish all judges would deal with this sovidiots like this. Get them out of court because they are wasting the court's time as the judge mentioned.
That the judge, DAVID D. WOLFE, a civil servant who spent many years in law school studying the complex and fair laws made by MANY others who did the same has the patience for this idiot is beyond comprehension! He could have just gotten angry and tossed this guy in a jail cell but rather this goes to show you that the personal power of such an authority is still humble, patient, and caring with the citizens that he encounters in the courtroom.
I have very much appreciation for this judge. God bless him!
He’s a gem. I seen too many judges who struggled to keep these crazies in line and he shuts him down quickly and no bs
I'm sure if this guy got extra stupid that he would have ended up in a jail cell real fast.
It probably brightened his day
'Complex ans fair laws' not a fan of system pigs
This judge rules❤I love him❤
I think Judge Simpson nailed it. He told defendant you're practicing law w/o a lic, that's felony punishable up to 4 yrs, do you want to continue, ok let me get a prosecutor in here..........he was done!!
You can represent yourself, can't represent others.
@@electricheartponyYeah, but these knuckleheads claim to be representing someone else when they show up in court.
@@hauntedshadowslegacy2826 yeah, but what OP here is talking about is an entire different case and judge. And it is worded like the judge told the defendant that he couldn't self represent without committing a felony.
Not a soul in the US has a license to practice law. No such thing.
@@zhartheProprietor uhm. Want to explain what you're talking about?
This Judge is a very patient man.
Yay! Finally a Judge who does not allow them to make a mockery out of our court system and will not allow them to waste everyone's valuable time.
What gets me is that these Sovcits walk into the courtroom believing that their words are going to "shock and awe" the judge and win the day. No. This stuff was old 100 years ago. Every court and every judge has seen it before multiple times and knows how to deal with it. I don't know anything about Judge Wolfe but I'm sure he's gone to law school, passed the BAR exam, was a lawyer for 10+ years and has been a judge for 10+ years. He's not going to be wowed by a sloppy document written by an "attorney of fact." Or by any Sovcit challenging jurisdiction or yelling out supreme court cases. Nope, not happening. Get a real lawyer, kids.
I'm with others here who say that the moment this guy refused to state his name the judge should have told him to sit down and immediately issued a bench warrant. Maybe a week in jail will help him remember his name.
he should have been held on contempt charges
You'd think they'd do some research to see how well these sorts of arguments work in real courts.
@@SuprousOxide They only look at web sites and youtube videos that say it works. They never look at ANYTHING that shows or says otherwise.
@@SuprousOxidewell, that would be smart, which is something that sovcits aren't.
They mostly think they have rights that will be upheld.
No democrat believes in human rights, and half of every body else generally fears rights and wants them stifled
Shoulda been an arrest warrant issued for failure to appear.
If your elected representative kneels on the house floor and speaks in tongues, then that representative is the political equivalent of a sovereign citizen.
These idiots wake up in the morning, look in the mirror and say "I got this, they can't touch me."
They are just so pitiful. How can anybody believe that this crap would ever work?
😂😂😂😂😂 I think your spot on
❤😂😅😂👍 👍
Yet another stunning victory for the Sovereign Citizen movement.
If you can't say your own name in kindergarten, then you probably shouldn't have made it out of kindergarten.
I love this judge!!! I used to watch his feed a lot, just haven't in a while. But I love how he treats the lawyers, he is always quick to tell stories, give guidance; teach little lessons. He was judge for a mock educational trial (its a must watch). He has a great amount of patients, which must be a must for judges. Of course as seen here he is just great at dealing with all kinds. Loved this clip, thank you!
Patience
This judge did an excellent job cutting through and ignoring the BS. Bravo!
These guys remind me of guys who buy online training on how to pick up women. The training tells you a bunch of lines that are guaranteed to get women to go out with you. Then they show vignettes of someone using the lines, and the women always respond according to the script and agree to date the guy. Then the guy tries it in the real world and the women look at him like he's nuts. There are no shortcuts in important matters in life. If it seems too good to believe, that's because it's not real.
Sounds like how incels are made.lolol
@@notme2day- not all incels are sov-tards, but all sov-tards are incels.
@@notme2dayThis defendant has a big “I” stamped on his forehead. What a cretin!
You seem to know a lot about these online trainings...XD
So, how many women did you try those lines on before you realized the training was bogus?...😁
Good on this judge, to maintain the integrity of his courtroom. The defendant should have, at best, provided popcorn for everyone .
Nonsense is a great way to label their spiel. 😉
wasn’t it! I just loved this one OD!
It baffles me how people appear in court and refuse to identify themselves, live in a country but refuse to recognize it and abide by the laws of that country, while at the same time probably taking all the benefits and relief from the government they fail to respect.
Judges and law enforcement need to stop pandering to these dolts.
they are more but courts drop or dismiss many charges...stop
they get bored like anyone else...
What part of due process don't you understand? The courts have procedures to follow.
@@jodiforeman3314courts don’t drop charges. District Attorneys do.
Yeah but judges and law enforcement cant fix stupid. only an education can do that.
I always wondered what kind of kids rode the short yellow bus. This guy is a perfect example!
Way to go Judge! Surely the way for ALL judges to operate and not wast any court's time.
This was pure gold! I am in awe how this amazing judge managed the charade of the so called "lawyer". 😂 The judge was like this is my court and I don't play games. Here... this is what we came here to do, make a note of the date and keep walking. ❤ Yeap. My respects to the judge.
I caught the judge holding back a glimmer of a smile at the beginning of this discussion. He knew what was coming and was calm and fully prepared. And the judges evidently knows his Latin…..plus he knows he has a camera on him so …… drum roll……hammer down. Waste of time and space Judge Wolfe. Thank you for naming this and mambo jumbo! So true.
Lol, he absolutely couldn’t wait to make mincemeat out of that fool and his sovcidiot nonsense! Hilarious! 😂
How do you gather that he knew Latin by referring to it as "Latin phrases?" That indicates ignorance.
@@logangodofcandy all judges and lawyers have to learn/know at least some Latin because it’s used so frequently in the law.
Unfortunately sovereign citizens are more common than most people would believe, so judges/attorneys are familiar with their bullshit
That was great! I wish all judges handled them this way!
The judge should have taken the obvious stance that that was Matthew Aldridge, charged him with contempt of court and attempting to defraud the court, revoked his bond, and tossed him in jail where he belonged.
I love judge Wolfe! He’s very fair and ethical and very sharp. But he doesn’t take any unnecessary BS and allow the court’s time to be wasted
Has anyone ever gotten away with anything by claiming they are a sovereign citizen?
Nope.
No , but they do get their charges dismissed a lot mainly because the courts don't want to deal with them, and many of their cases are barely misdemeanors. I wish they would stop dismissing the charges and just give them the business. Let them learn some life lessons
Awesome judge you had the perfect come back and response did I see that defendants jaw fall on the floor😅
Way to go your Honor.the disregard and contempt for our constitution makes most of Americans sick
Great judge.very calm and mature... professional..not suffering fools...an
I would love to see a update on the trial
you KNOW it!
please get it and POST IT!! @@OSGCourtWatch
July 15 trial date?!😮
Love you for taking these odd people back to jail❤❤
If I was the judge I would have held him in contempt for impersonating a lawyer.