Piaget on Piaget
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 вер 2024
- Full documentary about Jean PIaget's Genetic Epistemology. It shows some of the classic experiments (in abbreviated form) about seriation, conservation of volume and drawings. For more detail concerning Piagetian Theory and Method, see:
Müller, U., Carpendale, J. I., & Smith, L. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge companion to Piaget. Cambridge University Press. Filmed in Switzerland, 1977.
He made a documentary about himself..? What a fucking legend xD
Yeah, honestly it's pretty great to hear it straight from the man himself as opposed to interpreted by scientists, digested by a textbook, and reiterated by a teacher. It actually makes it a lot easiest to understand, which is ironic given that I don't speak a lick of French
@@destruktor5hundred296 uu
Also take into consideration that he felt responsibility for it.
Montessori had been financed by influential politicians to fulfill its mission, however, although it was a good deed, it only revealed the little interest there was in educational research.
At the age of 22 he published his first article on epistemology in children, while Montessori at 26 was just graduating medicine.
Making a documentary, writing so much, building psychological study centers and inventing the constructivist current was a vision he had for pedagogical culture.
Undoubtedly, this "narcissism" is covered with good intentions, so much so that up to now we use its model as the best and approved by UNESCO.
kanye 🤲🏼
Very enjoyable to watch. Thank you for uploading..
Half of what he says isn't in the subtitles.
Extremely interesting video! I'm deeply bourdieusian, and what I find here is entirely complementary of Bourdieu's work (and vice-versa).
I'm not around kids often, and the stick sorting experiment almost brought a tear to my eye. It's amazing how the human brain develops these "structuring structures" (to speak in bourdieusian terms), and comes up with more and more elaborate "algorithms" to achieve a task.
Also, what Piaget says about structures, and how misunderstood and misrepresented the concept is, is very important. The idea that since people don't tell by themselves the structure on which they act, then the structure is a creation of the observer. In his answer, I can read the exact same approach and thought process as in Bourdieu. It's amazing how both these theories already match so finely they are practically two sides of one single theory.
My friend I read a blog post a our bourdieu for the first time today so perhaps this is serendipitous! Do you know how to get at the gist of bourdieus thought?
2:27 "Each of us is continually creating our own knowledge"
For a brilliant man who studies structures you'd think he'd have a cleaner room.
He is first and foremost a creative mind and sometimes creative minds are messy. It is in that messiness that new connections are found. Very "structured" individuals are rarely creative, they just follow a the predefined connections of an stablished environment.
@@pepelopez6930 Intelligent people Can make out sense out of chaos.
One word "LEGEND"
Excelente documentário. Obrigado por disponibilizarem!
A pipe smoker, in that office..it's a wonder he never burned it down.
Nice little Chomsky dig.
Human children, 3 and half years you have been taking care of them eevery single day, and that's their image of a triangle @4:30
Thank you for uploading this video.
Taking french and psychology at uni= killing 2 birds with one stone right now lol
Thanks for the upload from a psychology student o/
Sometimes experts say that epistemology Piaget is Kantiana because Kant say that we have thinks structures but also Piaget is like Sartre and Marx but he says that human beings can built ourself
It has been pointed out that Piaget considered himself to be a succesor of Kant. In fact, some (e.g. Ramozzi-Chiarotino) have said that Piaget's theory is a sort of "Developmental Kantism". About Marx, there are similarities too because Marx writes about structures evolving on the basis of previous structures.
Hello luis Lam, can you give the reference about Ramozzi wher she develops this idea about "Developmental kantism"? Thanks a lot.
The book is: Ramozzi-Chiarottino, Z. (1984). Em busca do sentido da obra de Jean Piaget. São Paulo: Ática.
In case you can't find the book here are some related links:
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722002000200008&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-65641997000100008&script=sci_arttext#1not
www2.marilia.unesp.br/ojs-2.4.5/index.php/kinesis/article/view/5716
Fun fact: kant is not pronounced like can't. It is actually pronounced like cunt.😂
good experiment to prove conclusively the four stages of growth.
Thanks for the upload :D it is really helpful
no way the girl Catherine was only 9 years old! She looks like she was at least 14 years old! So mature already!
Only a genius can master chaos ;) see 38:13
Could it be that in the case of conservation experiment (the experiment with the length of the string), the child actually does not understand the language, the linguistic concepts asked of her to answer, not the idea of unchanged length if the rope?
The experiments shown in the video are conducted summarily for illustrative purposes and inevitably seem clumsy indeed. If you're interested in a more complete account of the way such experiments take place (and of how the interview methodology deals with the issues you point) I'd recommend checking the original publication: Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1948). La geometrie spontanee de l'enfant. (2nd edition in 1973).
thank you
I wonder where Emmanuel is today. To have been studied by Piaget.. crazy.
Catherine applies a highly parallelized version of merge sort!
THE REAL DEAL
Yeee
Gold
those are some awful subtitles there! The content is great, though.
this is great
plot twist: katherine is Einstien's daughter :D :D
You may think it about not what you Toulouse in France like I tested ground at renne with Berlinger I was feeling rather jyung at times
If you want to get it out there correctly, you do it yourself!
math is discovered not constructed
And where is math to be discovered?
@@fruta2997 In the innate patterns of nature.
Don’t you think that, it indeed is constructed based on our perception of the world? (Gödel’s Theorem could support the point implicitly)
So is literature. It's only harder to see why.
Maths is constructed as a tool of logical language to represent the world.
This logical language can be use to grow itself. Which shows you some new pattern. And since the real world follows logical abstraction. Maths allows you to discover new and real things.
It's constructed and then discovered
Irene creeps me out a bit
@20:02
@25:15
@24:47
@29:28
@36:46
x878x₩