Bay gets plenty of critical acclaim. His movies are part of the Criterion collection, along with a written essay by an expert in cinematography about his talents. Experts apparently agree that the guy has an amazing eye and is impressively gifted (though admittedly not too profound).
So he's Cubone, with a guitar that is also a flamethrower, suspended in front of a wall of amps that is itself attached to a suped-up hot rod? I do not have words to describe how excellent that is. Oh wait, yes I do: METAL
Ah, yes. *Mad Max: Fury Road*, the heartwarming tale of how a 70 year-old man who's spent the last decade making kids' films and hasn't made a live-action movie in almost 20 years and the 72 year-old cinematographer he had to pull out retirement resurrected a 35 year-old franchise everyone thought was dead and gave the world a crash course (literally) in how to make action movies. This makes *The Fast and the Furious* look like *Driving Miss Daisy*.
yeah but the wives think that they are going to have more water at the green place so it makes sense. immortant wastes water because he wants to appear like a god and he does have more water than he provides but doesn't want the people to know
@@sch4891 exactly, it's not supposed to be about distributing water to the wretches who camp out below the Citadel; it's about having so much water he can make it rain a world where water is almost Dune levels of precious
Max is barely an animal in this movie. As he says his only remaining instinct is "survive" because he's been forged by this world. But when he meets Furiosa's cause he starts to get his humanity back.
No... Max got his humanity back in Beyond Thunderdome... This was the Feral kid from The Road Warrior (Mad Max 2)... Immortan Joe was Toe Cutter from the original MAD MAX, that why he was on life support systems... (it's even the same actor)...
ArteAlen Lovely? Age of Ultron? I mean, if I watch a movie called Age of Ultron I want to see the god dammed Age of Ultron and that, my friend, never happened, all I saw was Ultron TRYING to rule the world. He never did it. What a stole.
ArteAlen Yeah, fun action, but not great. They wasted a chance to make something really cool. My bets are all with Batman vs Superman, which seems far more interesting.
Anyone who complains about Fury Road not having story or plot really didn't grasp the amount of world building George managed to pull off. Religions, cultures, societies, multiple settings, humanised villains etc etc It was a movie that made you think, Instead of being told.
Lorcan Ward Yes there was some nice world building, unfortunately we saw hardly any of it as they were driving across a desert for 90% of the movie, mainly in a straight line, with characters you struggle to care about as there is very little plot.
+Lorcan Ward There wasn't any world building and there was even less plot. Didn't think it was bad, but it'll probably be the only time I ever watch it. Certainly wasn't good enough to buy and watch again
Some reviewer called it the loudest silent movie of all time. And the first two times I watched it, I probably couldn't understand what was being said in half of the lines and it really doesn't matter at all.
The idea was to make a movie that could be understood by people from many different countries. Hence, the simple and easy-to-understand plot, minimal dialogue, and awesome action scenes.
+Lasse Sørnes What are you talking about? The honest trailer touched on how insanely boring the movie was without anything to hold your interest other than dose awsum explusins & dos sexxxy whorez. It is a mind numbing insult of a film. An obvious money grab.
People are confusing a simple narrative with a lack of one. Fury Road operates on a very primal, visceral level - forgoing exposition and over-explanation for contextual, visual development and rich imagery. I can completely understand why someone would hate it but I personally found it to be incredibly powerful, boasting some of the best cinematography I have literally ever seen. It is beautifully put together.
+Chris00Stans No, he said it uses primarily visuals to develop its characters and deliver emotional impact, which is still storytelling. A complicated plot is not necessary to tell a good story; well rounded characters with development are.
Not sure why everyone complains about Hardy's portrayal of Max as gruff, aggressive, and not speaking much. Mel Gibson's Max had like 15 lines in The Road Warrior, 2 of which were "I only came for the gasoline." (according to every movie facts blog ever)
+Borat69able Yeah, but the things they pointed out were incredibly forgivable. Usually they completely brutalize movies, even ones that are universally loved.
I loved how sympathetic this film was towards its mooks. There's a tendency to make mooks faceless and boring to rationalize how often they die (Avatar, Kick Ass, Kill Bill) but this one made them interesting bordering on sympathetic - and unexpectedly elevated one of them to a supporting character by the end - but was still willing to kill scores of them.
I thought Hardy was equally good to Theron - it's just more of a reactive, terse role, but it's no less demanding. I think people made such a big deal about the Furiosa character because they're so surprised whenever Hollywood gives them a female co-lead who isn't made into the love interest or subordinate (in power or narrative importance). Films like Fury Road expose how relatively formulaic and generic the vast majority of Hollywood blockbusters are.
Those are some of the reasons I loved this movie, it avoided many clichees like the forced romance between furiosa and max, furiosa held her own against the bad guys.
+Android 19 I loved the movie but I wish Max effected the plot more. In the Road Warrior, Lord Humungus would have never been defeated and the camp wouldn't have survived without Max. In Fury Road, if you took Max out of it, most of the movie would have been exactly the same. When it came to accomplishing goals and feats, Furiosa did 90% of that. I'm not saying he was useless but I do wish he had more effect on the story.
Screen Junkies Am i the only one that thought this movie was a bit overrated The movie was good but not as great as everyone say. I mean that's just my opinion.
I kinda feel sorry for all the artists who worked on the over 1000 VFX shots in this movie which pretty much no one noticed and are then told that their craft is completely inferior to practical stuff.
+Rowan J Coleman The fact that most people didn't notice is the biggest compliment the VFX people can get. The combination of practical effects with post processing is much more effective than straight VFX. This movie did a great job of using both.
+Casey Franek Speaking as a student of CGI, I can only hope that one day I manage to become good enough for people to say they didn't notice what I did.
"From the director of Happy feet an Babe, pig in the city" "wait..what?" Lol that's pretty much what I was thinking. That sequel to babe was pretty hard-core though 😆😆😆
Max is not the plot, he is the lens through which the audience views the plot. This was a pretty common storytelling device in the 70s and 80s. Lots of long-winded older anime in particular used this formula. Glad to see it back, personally.
Mad Max Fury Road is truely an absolute fucking masterpiece of hand-crafted action. You can take all your Marvel-CGI-Massacres, if we get another Movie like Mad Max!
Matthew Murdock Ok, I give you that. Winter Soldier was outstanding. (I'm not just hating the Marvel Movies, most of them are quite enjoyable or even really good. Just complaining about the amount of CGI)
+Matthew Murdock Technology in film is not advancing, is regressing, which is why they're producing worst cameras than they used to in the 80s, 60s, 70s and 50s. And i'm not just talking about awful digital cameras(that's not cinema, it's videomaking), i'm talking about film cameras too. Post-production is not filmmaking.
Post Production is not filmmaking?.....Post Production is film making its where 70 percent of the entire film goes, regardless of whether a film uses CGI, Practical effects, is shot in digital, shot on film..doesn't matter....post production is where all the editing takes place which is most certainly filmmaking.....without editing films would be released jumbled messes....post production is one of the most important parts of film making. 95 percent of films in the past century go through some kind of post production....you can thank D.W. Griffith for that. cause before that people just kind of developed film and released it, maybe doing things here and there....it wasn't that exciting.
Really? Who called for such a comparison. FF are generic, idiotic action flicks. While Mad Max Fury Road is a all around Masterpiece and definitely one of the best movies of the last year.
It's funny how nobody seems to get what the mad max character is all about. First of all we already know everything about him from the other films, and just like in the other films, he shows up and saves the day, and then leaves at the end. That's the character. It's what he does. Just because there's another character who has alot of screen time and partipates in saving the day doesn't make Max any less of the lead.
basquat76 Especially when you consider the fact that with out him Fury and those wives would most likely be dead if it wasn't for Max, I guess we can see him as the guardian for the group.
+basquat76 exactly, all Mad Max movies portray Max as an antihero who has no purpose but to help get himself and others out of bad situations. By the end of the movie he's supposed to be seen as a legend, someone who no one knows much about but who was important to the resolution of things and Fury Road did that perfectly.
basquat76 "Lead" or not, his character was very poorly written. Grunting and pointing at things is the extent of Max's dialog. He may be the titular character, but he was overshadowed by vastly superior characters, such as Furiosa, Immortan Joe and Nux. Prequels don't justify any character's lack of impact in any movie, let alone when they're 30 years old. Don't get me wrong; I LOVED Mad Max Fury Road, but Max's poor script was the lowest point of the movie by far.
+Calick The women shown in the trailer at that point are/were Immortan Joe's enslaved wives and the Citadel is Immortan Joe's stronghold. Hence, real housewives of the citadel.
Why are people so pissed they dont have a clear cut protagonist in this? in find it refreshing theres two main characters and not a clear focus on just one of them. we need a lot of experimentation in cinema...also with mythological aspects otherwise well just have the savior , jesus, neo tale written all over again
Walter Kovacs Ron and Hermione are only considered protagonists by those who don't know what protagonists are. They're supporting characters. Having an arc and being important doesn't make you a protagonist. They're better called deuteragonists if anything. If they had actually equal importance (note: they do not) to Harry then it could be considered a 3-protagonist story, but its not. They support Harry, and while being very important to his success, they are not the primary actors facing the primary antagonist.
StealthKun Silver food spray, for decorating stuff or for when you want people to witness you! Perhaps part of their belief system and or way to get high/hyped for a kamikaze run.
In the movie, I believe it's paint they spray in their mouths to huff before they commit suicide, chrome specifically because everything in The Future/Valhalla is chrome. Here it's an edible decorative spray for making chrome foods.
In the movie, I believe it's paint they spray in their mouths to huff before they commit suicide, chrome specifically because everything in The Future/Valhalla is chrome. Here it's an edible decorative spray for making chrome foods.
By looking at the comments, I can't believe how many people dislike this film. I understand that all film is subjective but there are some opinions that are really pushing it. Seriously, go back to watching Transformers or something.
+Miroslav Gnjatovic More important than the dislike is the given reasons. If the people expressing dislike could give a credible reasons, I would leave it at that and keep watching. But some of the reasons given just make me want to drive a truck over people. One person I normally respect called the film misogynist, which is really curious given that the film is a "if past is prologue" dirty look at how women as well as disabled and poor people are treated today. Some of the comments here, particularly the ones claiming that Max is not really in the film, just make me want to drop nukes on people. Yeah, so Max is not jumping up and down in front of the camera yelling "look at me! I am Max!" throughout the entire runtime. That is how ensembles where the interactions between characters drives the story work. RoboCop was not in a hundred percent of the real RoboCop film, either, and spoke less words in 100 minutes than each of the other characters do in 10. People are morons, basically.
+Miroslav Gnjatovic Though i agree as an action movie its a 10/10 . I believe as a whole it lacks a lot . So yeah genius maybe ill get back to watching crappy films like fuckin Kubrick's ,Scorsese's or some other's mastermind , because Mad Max was no way near those ... It lacked of Storyline , Acting * besides Nicholas Hoult, Character Depth and fuckin emotion ... Now suck it up your mouth with your overrated movie ..
+la antarctica *pat* There, there. I am so sorry that Fury Road’s visual gags about disability rights, social welfare, and the role scarcity plays in power structures went over your head. Go back to praising what you are told to.
+aspie182 I guess you see more than George Miller saw in his own movie while he was making it . Although to your defense i agree with your 3rd argument which is pretty legit ..Not sure if it makes up for a kinda lacking storyline in my opinion. Anyway in your comment it seems to me that you disagree only with the storyline factor.. So i assume you agree with me on the factors of : 1.Acting performances 2.Character depth 3. Emotion Buildup ? And please stop believing MadMax was a masterpiece. Comparing it to other action movies , yes i agree it was simply 10/10 , but generally as a movie it was like a bit over 3/4 for me which is just good ..
Plz say: "Hello commander. It is good, to see you again. We need you to take charge of resistance operations throughout the world. Establish contact with the local cells and bring them into the Fold. SAVE OUR WORLD. Time is short commander, good luck."
What a suprise Fury Road was! Can't believe it was so fucking AWESOME!! One of My favorite movies of all time! And My second favorite Action movie (only beaten by T2) The game comes out in a week! Can't Wait!! :)
Belt4in1. Most tie in games are, rushed, Lazy, not complete. Let me tell you something, Mad Max: The game has been in devolopment in 3 Years! No need to worry
I find it weird how people use this film as an example to say stop using CGI, practical fx are superior. A shit ton of this film was CGI! We should be using this film more as an example of how to blend CGI and practical effects together.
+Horscraft About 20% of the film was CGI, besides I agree with you. In this day and age it's possible to blend CGI and practical effects seemlessly to deliver great experiences, more directors and studios should take notice of this and the new Star Wars movie.
I think it's just people getting excited about an action movie that's willing to put the effort to blend in the practical effects with the CGI. There are quite a few action movies that just go full CGI, making it something of a really detailed cartoon.
They waste fuel and water because Immortan Joe is trying to keep up the illusion that he's a god by showing people that the things important to everyone else mean nothing to him. It's kind of like how countries like North Korea waste money building theme parks when there are millions of people starving. Also, the film is short on dialogue and exposition but there's plenty of story. It's like a dance performance or a shadow play. They may not tell you anything through words but so much is conveyed through the action and imagery. The film is like a ballet of chaos and destruction.
It does say something that Joe has so much of these precious resources that he can afford to waste. It helps to have all the water for yourself, and a literal Gas Town and Bullet Farm.
Why is everyone so butthurt about being movie's focus. I think it was well done and fitting for the charater. In fury road you are Max . You are just witnessing the events happen.
Probably because the movie is called "Mad Max", not "Furiosa". Max was not the best fighter, marksman, or driver. He didn't have the best lines. For anyone who isn't familiar with the series, the movie does a terrible job explaining his backstory. If you were to cut out the first few minutes involving him (which could have easily been done if this story revolved around Furiosa instead), he would probably have less airtime than Nux.
because Max backstory was explained in pervious movies. Unlike usual reset of Batman/Spiderman/Superman movie where we always have hero origin story movie focused on own story. Not need to plave hero origin in every movie at all. Movie is doing great job telling story with Max in background. And if someone will want to learn backstory of character will simply see pervious three movies. We don't need see origin story if every single movie in series. That allows to focus on story told from begining to end without unnecessary distractions. And in begining of movie there is enough viewer need to know who Max is. but that is only my opinion heh~ cheers and have nice day
It is a joke here...but people love to whinne about popular subjects to sound interesting...So although the director is doing exactly what you say, retards will whinne.
I feel like most of the people complaining about Max's lack of screentime haven't watched the previous films or haven't seen them in some time. Sure, he was (mostly) the main focus in the original film, but in both "Mad Max 2: Road Warrior" and "Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome", he was more of an audience surrogate and supporting player. The sequels have always been more about the "universe" and stories taking place within it than the character of Max. All three follow-ups basically use Max to usher the audience into the new story and characters, and then gradually shift focus from him. And this follows that pretty much perfectly.
@@boxtrolls6144 I'm guessing they took the "everything that can be practical is practical" approach buuut Max Mad's stuff is slightly less feasible than most movies that do that (secretly though, almost all modern films secretly mix in some CGI, even if there's no action)
I want that shot of Furiosa printed, framed, and signed by Charlize Theron, George Miller, and cinematographer John Seale (who should've won the Oscar that year, goddammit)
-Max drove the heavy rig in the gasoline canyon. -Max fixed the heavy rig when Nux was on board. -Max fixed it again gets caught in deep mud. -Max wanders into the dark to confront the Bullet Farmer, killing him and safely returning to the Rig with guns and ammunition. -Max convinced Furiosa to return to The Citadel. -Max fights Joe's eldest son, Rictus Erectus. -Max saves Furiosa's life by giving his blood ! -Other than his role in all the battles... What a lazy guy Max is... (Sorry but your point is invalid, Screenjunkies !)
+BeBo Morad It was a joke smartass. They only said it because a lot of people agree it was Furiosa's movie more than Max's, which btw it was. You people take this way too seriously.
It actually really annoys me when people try and downplay Tom Hardy's role in this film. I'll admit Charlize Theron was amazing as Furiosa, but credit where credit is due. Criticism for lack of dialogue on Max's part? I call that damn good acting when he can portray such a character with so few words.
+SlipperyEel Because he didn't need to talk.Movie started with Max and ended with Max.He was the driver and giving orders,making deals.Fury Road barely have Max in it.He was missing in half of the movie.Why did they even call the movie Mad Max.They could have call it Mad Nux which would make more sense than this.
Orhan çelik Fury Road started with Max, and ended with Max as well, he was present and a essential force throughout the entire movie. Because he was bound during the first portion of the film you believe him missing from an entire half? The next installment in the franchise will not feature Furiosa or Nux as it is not her series. You see the two parties parting ways, which do you think has the more compelling future? Furiosa who has reached her goal? Or Max? The ever wanderer?
TheMadThresher Dont play the dumb,you know what i mean by ''It started with Max''.Furry road may have started with Max.Only to put a gag on him and chain him for at least half of the movie.When he can talk,he didnt even talked.He just mumbled and growled.There was no Max in the movie.There was more Nux than Max in THAT movie.Emphasise on ''that movie''.I dont care about the future films.This movie wont have any effect on the next movie if there wont be any furiosa.So this is a seperate movie than future ones.
For those of you who boast how amazing Mad Max was, I have one thing to say......Waterworld. It's nearly the EXACT same movie. Only instead of people on water looking for earth, there are people on earth, looking for water.
For those who complain about the little CGI that is used in the movie: yeah it's used a few times but only when absolutely necessary. that is what CGI is for.
*My Rebuttal to "Mad Max sucked" comments:* 1. If you are just a hipster that doesn't like something for sheer spite...please go study for your freshman midterm. 2. If you harp on the lack of dialogue or plot without doing a shred of research into the making of this movie or the thought process behind it then please do said research. George Miller intended to, from the beginning, make a action movie in it's purest form, striped of the gaudy dialogue, romance, and humor that had become endemic to the genre. 3. If you are a "true" Mad Max fan who only watches the first two movies out of some misguided hipster dogma, please refer to point 1. 4. If you are upset about the lack of continuity in the Max canon please refer to point 2.
+Midironica As someone who liked this movie, but not to the same extenct to which you idiotic fans keep trying to sell it: 1. Several professional critics disliked the movie; they certainly ain't freshmen. 2. Any artistic work (which movies *are*) must stand alone without any research. That you think it needs research is a point *against* the movie. Not to mention that creator's intent is also irrelevant when interpreting a work. So congratulations on highlighting flaws of the movie while trying to defend it. 3. Refer to point One. 4. Refer to point Two.
Andres Iniesta Not that my opinion would erase the fact that Death of the Author is a thing and that several critics disliked this movie which means that my points would stand regardless... But my favorite action movies are Terminator 2, Die Hard and Aliens, so shut up, moron.
+Midironica 5. this movie tells it's story visually, not through dialogue. And it still has a lot of compelling scenes, strong themes and clever moments that elevate the story beyond most other films
I love how people say CGI sucks and use this movie to prove that point, not realizing the shit ton of CG that went into this film. All practical can look like shit, all CG can look like shit. Put them together and it can look awesome.
***** Yes there was a lot of CG used. The didn't film in an actual lightning dust storm. I wasn't remarking on any "point" that someone made, I clearly said "I love how *people* say CGI sucks" which I've heard a lot and people say. I'll ask that you reread my comment because I said because "All practical can look like shit, all CG can look like shit. Put them together and it can look awesome" is in agreement with that point you were trying to make. Is that more clear?
Bravo Kilo I don't care about CG or Practical effects. I care about action sequences you can follow for the first time! Really 90% of all the hollywood movies are Shacky Cam BS! Mad Max FTW!
Bravo Kilo Exactly it's not CGI that's a problem; it's overusing CGI and not using it to enhance effects. Most films go overboard with it and it looks a little fake when it's ALL CGI.
BenschMan2012 In Australia If a movie has heaps of violence it gets a M, MA, AV or R rating if it has nudity as well it gets a MA, AV, or R and if its a game with nudity R
+Vaughan Bunt Most movie theaters, including state-owned ones go lax on those, at least here in Finland, so I don't really care of it, fuck the police in all-risks-are-on-me situations. They don't really ID anyone here. I went to see K16 (that's the system here, K being for kielletty, _restricted_, and the number after being what you have to be in order to see it) when I was 14-15. But true, I think it is stupid that USA makes a curse word the biggest sin there is, but violence is no problem to 'em.
Somewhere Michael Bay is having a mental breakdown wondering why his explosions never get critical acclaim
I don’t think Michael Bay is the type of person to care
This is the movie that Michael Bay wanted to make but doesn't have the talent for.
Pretty sure Michael Bay said he doesn't give 2 shits what people think about his movies
@@belland_dog8235 that's obligatory for they are rather a bunch of advertising spots than movies.
Bay gets plenty of critical acclaim. His movies are part of the Criterion collection, along with a written essay by an expert in cinematography about his talents. Experts apparently agree that the guy has an amazing eye and is impressively gifted (though admittedly not too profound).
Mad Max is based on a real story of what happened after Australia lost its internet for a week.
+Damin lol
+Damin Don't be slack, it took a month.
+Damin MATE. Its still a lot of Australia now. haha
+Damin LMAO!
+Damin You win the internet today
"You will never be this metal..."
And then you find out that dude's wearing his mother's face.
hardcore
So he's Cubone, with a guitar that is also a flamethrower, suspended in front of a wall of amps that is itself attached to a suped-up hot rod?
I do not have words to describe how excellent that is.
Oh wait, yes I do: METAL
......Rammstein
Rammstein isn't even real metal. I love it though.
Are you kidding me with that shot?
or that one?
OR THAT ONE?!
Witness this!
'explosion
WOOOOOH!!
Pretty much me through the entire movie.
WOOOOOOO!!!!!
WOOOOOOH! Indeed!
Me too.
This movie is just as good in a marvel movie in my opinion
Michael Manzi or even better
Ah, yes. *Mad Max: Fury Road*, the heartwarming tale of how a 70 year-old man who's spent the last decade making kids' films and hasn't made a live-action movie in almost 20 years and the 72 year-old cinematographer he had to pull out retirement resurrected a 35 year-old franchise everyone thought was dead and gave the world a crash course (literally) in how to make action movies. This makes *The Fast and the Furious* look like *Driving Miss Daisy*.
"Mario Kart from Hell."
That's exactly how I described this movie.
but made in action heaven
Thor! This is a Mad Max movie!
Thor: You mean Mario Kart from Hell.
Yes... Thats what Mad Max means.
"Tom Hardley in the movie" I'm dead!
darude - Sandstorm is even better ahahahah
+Pedro Oliveira I died of laughter at the darude part too
+rassi13 Mad Max: Rooooooooad trip!
hahaha, that was so funny.
the mario kart from hell! hahaha😀😁😂
The water wasting was so upsetting!
especially in Africa.
lmfao
yeah but the wives think that they are going to have more water at the green place so it makes sense. immortant wastes water because he wants to appear like a god and he does have more water than he provides but doesn't want the people to know
It goes back into the ground, where it’s being pumped from
@@sch4891 exactly, it's not supposed to be about distributing water to the wretches who camp out below the Citadel; it's about having so much water he can make it rain a world where water is almost Dune levels of precious
"tom hardly in the movie". and i thought nothing could ever top "liam’s nissan".
Where’s that from
just for comments taken honest trailer
Liam Neeson's niece on his Nissan.
Liam Neeson Liam Neeson's knees son Liam Neeson's knees on his niece in a Nissan
I like “the following proof that more does not necessarily mean better” for Star Wars III
When the Honest Trailers trailer is almost totally positive, you know the movie is great
This is one of the best movies of all time
True.
Go watch it.
By now u should have done that.
Just finished watching it; couldn't find a single fault. Even the balls-to-the-wall action managed to be well-paced.
It sucked
John Gardner i found one 😉
"When they dare to turn... Left!"
For some reason I could not stop laughing at this.
You must be Derek Zoolandar😂
Political metaphor perhaps? A good aim causing kerfuffle.
Or drive through the desert!
You are right!
Max is barely an animal in this movie. As he says his only remaining instinct is "survive" because he's been forged by this world. But when he meets Furiosa's cause he starts to get his humanity back.
It didn't work,in fact it kind of sucked
Don't read into this one too much, just enjoy the boom booms
This Max was not really needed in this movie.
No... Max got his humanity back in Beyond Thunderdome... This was the Feral kid from The Road Warrior (Mad Max 2)... Immortan Joe was Toe Cutter from the original MAD MAX, that why he was on life support systems... (it's even the same actor)...
Max is sort of a Rod Serling character -- he wanders the wasteland and stories happen around him.
When I got a free film ticket and only two choices between the Age of Ultron and Mad Max, I should have chosen Mad Max.
+inferno0020 Between a kick on my balls and ticket for Age of Ultron, I would take the kick.
+inferno0020 I went to both at the same day! OH WHAT A LOVELY DAY!
ArteAlen Lovely? Age of Ultron? I mean, if I watch a movie called Age of Ultron I want to see the god dammed Age of Ultron and that, my friend, never happened, all I saw was Ultron TRYING to rule the world. He never did it. What a stole.
Gerardo Uribe Well the movie universe is nothing compared to comic one that's for sure but it was a fun action movie non then less :)
ArteAlen Yeah, fun action, but not great. They wasted a chance to make something really cool. My bets are all with Batman vs Superman, which seems far more interesting.
Anyone who complains about Fury Road not having story or plot really didn't grasp the amount of world building George managed to pull off. Religions, cultures, societies, multiple settings, humanised villains etc etc It was a movie that made you think, Instead of being told.
i dont know if thats true...please give me an example for all that :)
+Lorcan Ward I better rewatch eraserhead then. It has a lot more plot than this mediocre sequel.
Lorcan Ward fuck yeah! he a lot with very few words or story.
Lorcan Ward Yes there was some nice world building, unfortunately we saw hardly any of it as they were driving across a desert for 90% of the movie, mainly in a straight line, with characters you struggle to care about as there is very little plot.
+Lorcan Ward There wasn't any world building and there was even less plot. Didn't think it was bad, but it'll probably be the only time I ever watch it. Certainly wasn't good enough to buy and watch again
"Tom...Hardly in this film!" I lost it! Lol!
I love the metal guitarist so much
Everybody does.
ROCK ON DOOF McDOOF FACE!!!!! YEEEAHHHH!!! more face chrome please...
He is part of the anxiety and rush feeling of the movie
Aren't there some drummers also ?
Hes also a former blind orphan prodigy, wearing the face he cut from his murdered mother over his own.
Best pure action film in years. One of the few films that could have been a silent movie and it still would have been incredible.
Oooo great interpretation about working really beautifully as a silent film.
The music alone was so goddamn intense.
Some reviewer called it the loudest silent movie of all time.
And the first two times I watched it, I probably couldn't understand what was being said in half of the lines and it really doesn't matter at all.
IIRC they actually released a b&w and a silent version (with only the score) on dvd
The idea was to make a movie that could be understood by people from many different countries. Hence, the simple and easy-to-understand plot, minimal dialogue, and awesome action scenes.
Mad Max is so ridiculously insane that even an honest trailer can't make a fool of it.
Streaming services, bring on Mad Max Fury Road!
Lasse Sørnes Yeah I noticed Honest Trailers really struggling to make jokes out of Fury Road.
You can't make a joke out of Fury Road. It's impossible:)
I honestly didn't expect much from it, but it was really a great flick.
+Lasse Sørnes What are you talking about? The honest trailer touched on how insanely boring the movie was without anything to hold your interest other than dose awsum explusins & dos sexxxy whorez. It is a mind numbing insult of a film. An obvious money grab.
eɔuarongI yW ǝƃılbO You are out of your fucking mind.
People are confusing a simple narrative with a lack of one. Fury Road operates on a very primal, visceral level - forgoing exposition and over-explanation for contextual, visual development and rich imagery. I can completely understand why someone would hate it but I personally found it to be incredibly powerful, boasting some of the best cinematography I have literally ever seen. It is beautifully put together.
Spot on.
THANK YOU. I hate when people complain about the character development and story, because they are so much more than those people complain about.
Thank you! Someone understands!!
+Chris00Stans No, he said it uses primarily visuals to develop its characters and deliver emotional impact, which is still storytelling. A complicated plot is not necessary to tell a good story; well rounded characters with development are.
***** teres a story... but instead of telling to you they show it to you.. and the succed on it, thats why its so good
Not sure why everyone complains about Hardy's portrayal of Max as gruff, aggressive, and not speaking much. Mel Gibson's Max had like 15 lines in The Road Warrior, 2 of which were "I only came for the gasoline." (according to every movie facts blog ever)
Haha. I love how they couldn't think of a single bad thing to say about this movie.
+Narthumpulous Did you watch the video? They did...
+Borat69able yea, extreme nitpicking that can be torn apart....they even said it was better tan age of ultron...the fanboys wet dream
+Greg Barnett Word. This movie was practically flawless.
+Borat69able Yeah, but the things they pointed out were incredibly forgivable. Usually they completely brutalize movies, even ones that are universally loved.
Narthumpulous I really wouldn't call 'poor story' forgivable in a movie but Mad Max did make up for it in its practical effects and cinematography.
Tom Hardly in the movie LOOOOOOOL
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
+Sam Sigbjørn I dieded
+Sam Sigbjørn I...cried laughing!!!
+Sam Sigbjørn Yeah, sad but true, Max was just a sidekick in the movie. Luckily Charlize was really awesome as Furiosa.
+Sam Sigbjørn really!!lol!!
I loved how sympathetic this film was towards its mooks. There's a tendency to make mooks faceless and boring to rationalize how often they die (Avatar, Kick Ass, Kill Bill) but this one made them interesting bordering on sympathetic - and unexpectedly elevated one of them to a supporting character by the end - but was still willing to kill scores of them.
I thought Hardy was equally good to Theron - it's just more of a reactive, terse role, but it's no less demanding. I think people made such a big deal about the Furiosa character because they're so surprised whenever Hollywood gives them a female co-lead who isn't made into the love interest or subordinate (in power or narrative importance). Films like Fury Road expose how relatively formulaic and generic the vast majority of Hollywood blockbusters are.
It's even rarer that the main female lead gets to fight a male villain, usually they just end up fighting the female baddy.
I thought Hardy had potential but we never really got time to get attached to the character. I wish they'd focused on him more
Not to mention the fact that Max comes up with the idea for them to turn around and thus prevent all the women travelling to their deaths...
Those are some of the reasons I loved this movie, it avoided many clichees like the forced romance between furiosa and max, furiosa held her own against the bad guys.
People also dont know that thats the format of a madmax movie, thats why the stories continue like they do - its also the format of fallout games.
Mario cart from hell XD
*kart
Scarily accurate description
You will never be this METAL ! Damn right ! :)
+Zatchooze Naut some ride the fury road to escape or find redemption, he rides: *TO* *Shred*!!
+weiner shnitzel *LET US RIFF!!*
Darude - Sandstorm!! omg hahahaha
+FatFr33Pudding Did you see in the news that him and Tom Hardy are actually old pals
+Jonas Seorum Been pals ever since. Bro's at first sight.
+FatFr33Pudding oh i know, so hilarious......................................................
***** I don't get it. No seriously; WTF was funny about that.
***** You must be new to the internet I guess
Together they'll embark on a two hour game of Mario Kart... FROM HELL! LMAO I'm dead!!! lololol
Those who complain that Max is just "there", probably have never seen a Mad Max movie before.
+Akron162 Right? This movie is honestly just a modern version of Road Warrior, and most people hold that as by far the best of the original three.
+Android 19 "The best of the original three"... so we all agree to forget about Thunderdome?
+Android 19 I loved the movie but I wish Max effected the plot more. In the Road Warrior, Lord Humungus would have never been defeated and the camp wouldn't have survived without Max. In Fury Road, if you took Max out of it, most of the movie would have been exactly the same. When it came to accomplishing goals and feats, Furiosa did 90% of that. I'm not saying he was useless but I do wish he had more effect on the story.
+Akron162 So what ? Mad Max is decades old and ppl have moved on.
+Akron162 Well he was more involved in the first one but then it was basically his origin story.
More ScreenJunkies Fun! ►► brk.cm/1PQsept
Screen Junkies Please do an honest trailler about Smosh the movie
Screen Junkies Am i the only one that thought this movie was a bit overrated The movie was good but not as great as everyone say. I mean that's just my opinion.
Do Suckerpunch! Seriously!
Hey it was better than a shitfest Michael Bay film. That's pretty much all that is required.
plz make honest trailer of bourne ultimatum
Literally everyone after watching this film:"Oh What a movie , what a lovely movie .
Confirmed.
Not me hated it... Don't understand what the fuss is about
Nope,I thought it was a poor knock off at best
Old Mel Gibson would have made it far better,hardy phones his performance in and it showed
You're wrong. I thought it was an utter garbage.
3 people in my house saw it and all 3 said it was the worst movie they'd ever seen. They haven't seen 300 yet.
This video made me realize how simplistic the movie is but also how much of a masterpiece it is
yasss
The Role Mel Gibson got too mad to play LMAO
+Graham Quigley damn, you beat me to it!
Mario kart from hell.
XD*
+Youngerhampster I'd play it.
+cptTK421 Then play the Mad Max game on PS4
on the Rainbow desert road
I'm game!!
I kinda feel sorry for all the artists who worked on the over 1000 VFX shots in this movie which pretty much no one noticed and are then told that their craft is completely inferior to practical stuff.
+Rowan J Coleman The fact that most people didn't notice is the biggest compliment the VFX people can get.
The combination of practical effects with post processing is much more effective than straight VFX. This movie did a great job of using both.
+Casey Franek Speaking as a student of CGI, I can only hope that one day I manage to become good enough for people to say they didn't notice what I did.
We noticed.
+Rowan J Coleman if i was a CGI artist it would be a compliment to be told that my work looks like practical effects honestly
UndergroundTrev Except it already does in many instances.
"From the director of Happy feet an Babe, pig in the city" "wait..what?"
Lol that's pretty much what I was thinking. That sequel to babe was pretty hard-core though 😆😆😆
"YOU WILL NEVER BE THIS METAL"
so true! X'D
I tried to be that metal, does that count?
Max is not the plot, he is the lens through which the audience views the plot. This was a pretty common storytelling device in the 70s and 80s. Lots of long-winded older anime in particular used this formula. Glad to see it back, personally.
Nausicaa
"From the director of Happy Feet and Babe: Pig in the City"
ROFL!
Let's be honest, Mad Max: Fury Road was just the daily commute to work and back. ;)
An explosion filled commute with enough testosterone to give a woman a hipster beard and testicles.
Well it is Australian...
Mad Max Fury Road is truely an absolute fucking masterpiece of hand-crafted action. You can take all your Marvel-CGI-Massacres, if we get another Movie like Mad Max!
Matthew Murdock Ok, I give you that. Winter Soldier was outstanding. (I'm not just hating the Marvel Movies, most of them are quite enjoyable or even really good. Just complaining about the amount of CGI)
+Matthew Murdock I think he's referring to the CGI slaughter of thousands of CGI robots in Age of Ultron
So no mention of Jurassic world?
+Matthew Murdock Technology in film is not advancing, is regressing, which is why they're producing worst cameras than they used to in the 80s, 60s, 70s and 50s. And i'm not just talking about awful digital cameras(that's not cinema, it's videomaking), i'm talking about film cameras too. Post-production is not filmmaking.
Post Production is not filmmaking?.....Post Production is film making its where 70 percent of the entire film goes, regardless of whether a film uses CGI, Practical effects, is shot in digital, shot on film..doesn't matter....post production is where all the editing takes place which is most certainly filmmaking.....without editing films would be released jumbled messes....post production is one of the most important parts of film making. 95 percent of films in the past century go through some kind of post production....you can thank D.W. Griffith for that. cause before that people just kind of developed film and released it, maybe doing things here and there....it wasn't that exciting.
Please say: ''People die when they are killed.''
+PetriN94 yes!
+PetriN94 dear god
Yes please say this! I fourth this request!
+PetriN94 *legend Says
+PetriN94 Shut up Shirou
Mad Max series > all those silly fast and furious films
Really? Who called for such a comparison. FF are generic, idiotic action flicks. While Mad Max Fury Road is a all around Masterpiece and definitely one of the best movies of the last year.
kuzhan maruf I totally agree.
The latest is just called Furious because they're too old to be fast anymore.
***** lol I liked both, but yeah the Mel Gibson ones were the best.
nooby person Who me? =(
"There has got to be a more efficient way to distribute that"
LMFAOOOOO
And Darude - Sandstorm xDDD
Finally you can post that comment without trolling.
+apollocreedcity dododododododo dododododododo DODODODODODODO dododododododo doo dododododo DOO dododododo
no one mentions legendary chumbucket ;-;
+apollocreedcity lol, it was great, spot on.
+apollocreedcity
322 likes!!!
You will never be that metal LOL
late but rock on \m/
That guy with the guitar though xD Shredding for 2 days!
WITNESS THIS!
And Darude - Sandstorm!!!!! XD
Are you still alive ?
best honest trailer!
and i love Tom's grunting! i think he should have won the oscar for supporting boar.
It's funny how nobody seems to get what the mad max character is all about. First of all we already know everything about him from the other films, and just like in the other films, he shows up and saves the day, and then leaves at the end. That's the character. It's what he does. Just because there's another character who has alot of screen time and partipates in saving the day doesn't make Max any less of the lead.
basquat76 Especially when you consider the fact that with out him Fury and those wives would most likely be dead if it wasn't for Max, I guess we can see him as the guardian for the group.
+basquat76 exactly, all Mad Max movies portray Max as an antihero who has no purpose but to help get himself and others out of bad situations. By the end of the movie he's supposed to be seen as a legend, someone who no one knows much about but who was important to the resolution of things and Fury Road did that perfectly.
basquat76 "Lead" or not, his character was very poorly written. Grunting and pointing at things is the extent of Max's dialog. He may be the titular character, but he was overshadowed by vastly superior characters, such as Furiosa, Immortan Joe and Nux. Prequels don't justify any character's lack of impact in any movie, let alone when they're 30 years old.
Don't get me wrong; I LOVED Mad Max Fury Road, but Max's poor script was the lowest point of the movie by far.
The first one he was the lead, the only guy who got close to the screen time who wasn't a villain was goose
The main character of the first Mad Max was Goose and he was more mad then Max. In fact, it should have been called Mad Goose XD
Does anyone agree that this honest trailer is one of Epic Voice Guy's favorite?
Bane in a sleep apnea mask!! I screamed and died laughing :))))
That's Hugh Keyes -Byrn, who was the Toecutter in the original Mad Max.
"Real housewives of the citadel"
I fucking lost it at that HAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
+Motör Punx I lost it 10 seconds before that. "Tom *Hardly* in the movie." Hahaha, beautiful.
+Motör Punx Can you tell me what was it referencing? I didn't get that one.
+Calick The women shown in the trailer at that point are/were Immortan Joe's enslaved wives and the Citadel is Immortan Joe's stronghold. Hence, real housewives of the citadel.
+Calick Real Housewives of (XYZ) is a reality TV Franchise
+Motör Punx I know, but that's not what makes the joke.
Why are people so pissed they dont have a clear cut protagonist in this? in find it refreshing theres two main characters and not a clear focus on just one of them.
we need a lot of experimentation in cinema...also with mythological aspects otherwise well just have the savior , jesus, neo tale written all over again
Because it's called Mad Max
+TheWimmse Commander Shepard Christ
+DavidS Videos Harry Potter is called Harry Potter, but it has three protagonists that all have their own arc. Fury Road is the same.
Walter Kovacs Good example but it's still much more about Harry.
Walter Kovacs Ron and Hermione are only considered protagonists by those who don't know what protagonists are. They're supporting characters. Having an arc and being important doesn't make you a protagonist. They're better called deuteragonists if anything. If they had actually equal importance (note: they do not) to Harry then it could be considered a 3-protagonist story, but its not. They support Harry, and while being very important to his success, they are not the primary actors facing the primary antagonist.
I almost shit myself @ Eric the actor lol
I thought same thing. When I saw the film my first thought was eric the actor. He is actually Quentin Kenihan who is quite well known in Australia
Eric the Actor was a frequent & annoying caller on the Howard Stern Show.
Eric the actor was by far the best wack packer. I died when he said that too lol
Mitchell Wiggs Ack Ack!
Mitchell Wiggs I was looking for someone to mention eric
You know a movie is good when even Honest Trailers can't find anything really wrong with it.
Dafaq is that chrome spray thing ?
StealthKun Silver food spray, for decorating stuff or for when you want people to witness you!
Perhaps part of their belief system and or way to get high/hyped for a kamikaze run.
+StealthKun www.amazon.com/Wilton-710-5521-Silver-Color-Mist/dp/B005KTVG86
I should buy that so Valhalla-senpai will notice me.
In the movie, I believe it's paint they spray in their mouths to huff before they commit suicide, chrome specifically because everything in The Future/Valhalla is chrome. Here it's an edible decorative spray for making chrome foods.
In the movie, I believe it's paint they spray in their mouths to huff before they commit suicide, chrome specifically because everything in The Future/Valhalla is chrome. Here it's an edible decorative spray for making chrome foods.
You mean it makes every other movie in 2015 look tame by comparison. Yes even Star Wars
The Real Barack Obama summer movie that year
also star wars was shit.
also star wars was shit.
Up to 2020.
Now that Charlize Theron is going to be in the new fast and furious, did he see the future when he said "Fast and Furiousa"?
SCOTT PILGRAM VS THE WORLD PLS PLS PLS !!
that would be awesome.
+AnimeAndRock Scott Pilgrim Please!!!!
YES!!!
FOR THE 5 YEAR ANNIVERSARY
Yes!!!!!!
By looking at the comments, I can't believe how many people dislike this film. I understand that all film is subjective but there are some opinions that are really pushing it. Seriously, go back to watching Transformers or something.
+Miroslav Gnjatovic More important than the dislike is the given reasons. If the people expressing dislike could give a credible reasons, I would leave it at that and keep watching. But some of the reasons given just make me want to drive a truck over people. One person I normally respect called the film misogynist, which is really curious given that the film is a "if past is prologue" dirty look at how women as well as disabled and poor people are treated today.
Some of the comments here, particularly the ones claiming that Max is not really in the film, just make me want to drop nukes on people. Yeah, so Max is not jumping up and down in front of the camera yelling "look at me! I am Max!" throughout the entire runtime. That is how ensembles where the interactions between characters drives the story work. RoboCop was not in a hundred percent of the real RoboCop film, either, and spoke less words in 100 minutes than each of the other characters do in 10. People are morons, basically.
+Miroslav Gnjatovic Though i agree as an action movie its a 10/10 . I believe as a whole it lacks a lot .
So yeah genius maybe ill get back to watching crappy films like fuckin Kubrick's ,Scorsese's or some other's mastermind , because Mad Max was no way near those ... It lacked of Storyline , Acting * besides Nicholas Hoult, Character Depth and fuckin emotion ... Now suck it up your mouth with your overrated movie ..
+la antarctica *pat* There, there. I am so sorry that Fury Road’s visual gags about disability rights, social welfare, and the role scarcity plays in power structures went over your head. Go back to praising what you are told to.
+aspie182 I guess you see more than George Miller saw in his own movie while he was making it .
Although to your defense i agree with your 3rd argument which is pretty legit ..Not sure if it makes up for a kinda lacking storyline in my opinion.
Anyway in your comment it seems to me that you disagree only with the storyline factor.. So i assume you agree with me on the factors of : 1.Acting performances 2.Character depth 3. Emotion Buildup ?
And please stop believing MadMax was a masterpiece. Comparing it to other action movies , yes i agree it was simply 10/10 , but generally as a movie it was like a bit over 3/4 for me which is just good ..
+la antarctica Assumption is the mother of all fukk-ups.
"Tom Hardly in the movie" KKKKKKKK
Dirty Harry Por causa do Kkk né?
Dirty Harry Gringo só usa sigla. Prefiro uheueu
Everytime you say "WOOO" in a video I gain a year of life
Plz say: "Hello commander. It is good, to see you again. We need you to take charge of resistance operations throughout the world. Establish contact with the local cells and bring them into the Fold. SAVE OUR WORLD. Time is short commander, good luck."
+Kysman95 It feels like you're trying to make him do free voice-over work for your indie game or movie.
NightWatch707 :D No, it's his own line from XCom 2
+NightWatch707 You really dont have any clue bro. Its him from XCOM...
***** Yeah I got it the first time he said it.
+Kysman95 This needs to happen.
What a suprise Fury Road was! Can't believe it was so fucking AWESOME!! One of My favorite movies of all time! And My second favorite Action movie (only beaten by T2) The game comes out in a week! Can't Wait!! :)
Zag Broo Movie tie-in games are nothing to get excited about though :/
Belt4in1. Most tie in games are, rushed, Lazy, not complete. Let me tell you something, Mad Max: The game has been in devolopment in 3 Years! No need to worry
Jacob Bennett. Some people didn't like it. I FUCKING loved it!
Zag Broo Oh yeah, I remember the trailer from E3 a while back, good point, just don't expect it to be as good as the movie though.
Belt4in1. We will see! :)
This movie was a masterpiece!
Alberto Arras NO IT WASN'T. IT WAS NOT GOOD. IT WAS BORING!
E Martinez ok
@@emartinez7733 lmao stfu then why are you here I'd you dont like it
E Martinez I bet this guy really loved the last air bender movie LOL
@@LegendLength No, but we think this guy is craving some negative attention "bro".
stuff like this or john wick braught us back real actionfilms in hollywood. can't thank 'em enough
I think I'd prefer cinematic universes of these movies over the MCU or SW
I find it weird how people use this film as an example to say stop using CGI, practical fx are superior. A shit ton of this film was CGI! We should be using this film more as an example of how to blend CGI and practical effects together.
+Horscraft About 20% of the film was CGI, besides I agree with you. In this day and age it's possible to blend CGI and practical effects seemlessly to deliver great experiences, more directors and studios should take notice of this and the new Star Wars movie.
Johnny Twohats Which CGI video? Link me.
that sandstorm was totally real! :D
Horscraft I assume it's this one: ua-cam.com/video/bL6hp8BKB24/v-deo.html
I think it's just people getting excited about an action movie that's willing to put the effort to blend in the practical effects with the CGI. There are quite a few action movies that just go full CGI, making it something of a really detailed cartoon.
The guy who did Babe made this? HOLY SHIT!!!
+NekuCloudHyugaLagoon No, the guy that made the terrible sequel to Babe, called Babe:Pig in the City.
+1985cactus He was heavily involved in the first Babe too, he just didn't direct it.
George Miller directed both Babe movies. And the two movies are awesome.
War pig
+NekuCloudHyugaLagoon And Happy Feet.
They waste fuel and water because Immortan Joe is trying to keep up the illusion that he's a god by showing people that the things important to everyone else mean nothing to him. It's kind of like how countries like North Korea waste money building theme parks when there are millions of people starving.
Also, the film is short on dialogue and exposition but there's plenty of story. It's like a dance performance or a shadow play. They may not tell you anything through words but so much is conveyed through the action and imagery. The film is like a ballet of chaos and destruction.
very well said and I agree!
It does say something that Joe has so much of these precious resources that he can afford to waste. It helps to have all the water for yourself, and a literal Gas Town and Bullet Farm.
Roman Torchwick kinda do. there is this gang running around called "The Cops"
+ipu5hbutt0ns You're out of your fucking mind if you believe that.
+ipu5hbutt0ns American police shootings are neither 'mass' nor 'executions', whether you believe them to be justified or not.
Why is everyone so butthurt about being movie's focus. I think it was well done and fitting for the charater. In fury road you are Max . You are just witnessing the events happen.
Probably because the movie is called "Mad Max", not "Furiosa". Max was not the best fighter, marksman, or driver. He didn't have the best lines. For anyone who isn't familiar with the series, the movie does a terrible job explaining his backstory. If you were to cut out the first few minutes involving him (which could have easily been done if this story revolved around Furiosa instead), he would probably have less airtime than Nux.
because Max backstory was explained in pervious movies. Unlike usual reset of Batman/Spiderman/Superman movie where we always have hero origin story movie focused on own story. Not need to plave hero origin in every movie at all. Movie is doing great job telling story with Max in background. And if someone will want to learn backstory of character will simply see pervious three movies.
We don't need see origin story if every single movie in series. That allows to focus on story told from begining to end without unnecessary distractions. And in begining of movie there is enough viewer need to know who Max is.
but that is only my opinion heh~ cheers and have nice day
It is a joke here...but people love to whinne about popular subjects to sound interesting...So although the director is doing exactly what you say, retards will whinne.
"retards"??? what a wonderful personality you must have....
I feel like most of the people complaining about Max's lack of screentime haven't watched the previous films or haven't seen them in some time. Sure, he was (mostly) the main focus in the original film, but in both "Mad Max 2: Road Warrior" and "Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome", he was more of an audience surrogate and supporting player. The sequels have always been more about the "universe" and stories taking place within it than the character of Max. All three follow-ups basically use Max to usher the audience into the new story and characters, and then gradually shift focus from him. And this follows that pretty much perfectly.
Mad Max should be nominated for an Oscar. Who agrees?
ClemMedia me
It probably will be frankly.
Unless of course some other movies pulls a last second Birdman AGAIN.
It should be nominated for all the oscars! Even best animated, because why the fuck not?
+ClemMedia It should be nominated for best picture honestly.
This film actually has a lot of cgi. It's the blend of practical and cgi that makes the films effects spectacular
Not really. Ive watched a video on how they made this movie and it only has a very few cgi like the sand storm
@@boxtrolls6144 I'm guessing they took the "everything that can be practical is practical" approach buuut Max Mad's stuff is slightly less feasible than most movies that do that (secretly though, almost all modern films secretly mix in some CGI, even if there's no action)
Still better than Avatar.
In other words it’s… MEDIOCRE!
Mad max is definitely the best movie of 2015 so far
HELL NOOO!!!
+FlashSnapshotMachine why not?
Who doesn't like spongebob and mad max? Dick
Except it didn't suck
+Yeah I Know Opinions, how do they work?
I didn't like Jurassic World, and I'm still a Marvel fanboy, but this film is badass and deserved all the awards it got.
Potter TheAvenger well clearly you’ve like RWBY too so our tastes are pretty much the same lol
I wanna buy that spray so people can WITNESS ME!
WITNEEEEESSSS!!!!
+Collector2006 Mediocre, Collector, MEDIOCRE!!
Rafael Teles NOOOO
So...;
Age of Ultron = Mediocre
Jurassic World = Mediocre
Terminator Genisys = (screaming)*NOOOOOOOOOOOO*
I want that shot of Furiosa printed, framed, and signed by Charlize Theron, George Miller, and cinematographer John Seale (who should've won the Oscar that year, goddammit)
Thomas and the Magic Railroad Honest Trailer next for the 70th anniversary!
***** We want an Honest Trailer for Thomas and the Magic Railroad!
Disney Fan Forever Say "One, two, three, PUSH! Ahem... My doctor has forbidden me to push."
y
+SuperHeroTime27 I absolutely agree
Do Space Jam.
Just off the trailer can already tell this will be a better Borderlands movie than the actual Borrderlands movie
-Max drove the heavy rig in the gasoline canyon.
-Max fixed the heavy rig when Nux was on board.
-Max fixed it again gets caught in deep mud.
-Max wanders into the dark to confront the Bullet Farmer, killing him and safely returning to the Rig with guns and ammunition.
-Max convinced Furiosa to return to The Citadel.
-Max fights Joe's eldest son, Rictus Erectus.
-Max saves Furiosa's life by giving his blood !
-Other than his role in all the battles...
What a lazy guy Max is... (Sorry but your point is invalid, Screenjunkies !)
+BeBo Morad It was a joke smartass. They only said it because a lot of people agree it was Furiosa's movie more than Max's, which btw it was. You people take this way too seriously.
+Wasabifold Bullshit. They even got all the names wrong. Clearly, they didn't see the movie. It isn't Tom Hardly, lol, lol yolo....etc.
+Sado Crazyness 'Tom Hardly' was literally a pun lmAO
+Cosima Radashell And you literally didn't pick up on *Sado Crazyness*'s sarcasm.
say "you thought it was screen junkies but it was me! Dio!"
+Kitsune~ this!
+Kitsune~ Or " MUDA MUDA MUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDA"
+Kitsune~ Yes! This!
URYYYYYYYYY
How many breads have you eaten in your life?
It actually really annoys me when people try and downplay Tom Hardy's role in this film. I'll admit Charlize Theron was amazing as Furiosa, but credit where credit is due. Criticism for lack of dialogue on Max's part? I call that damn good acting when he can portray such a character with so few words.
+TheMadThresher so true
+TheMadThresher It's like they've never seen Mad Max 2. Gibson has only like 14 lines of dialogue (or something around that number) in that movie.
+SlipperyEel Because he didn't need to talk.Movie started with Max and ended with Max.He was the driver and giving orders,making deals.Fury Road barely have Max in it.He was missing in half of the movie.Why did they even call the movie Mad Max.They could have call it Mad Nux which would make more sense than this.
Orhan çelik Fury Road started with Max, and ended with Max as well, he was present and a essential force throughout the entire movie. Because he was bound during the first portion of the film you believe him missing from an entire half?
The next installment in the franchise will not feature Furiosa or Nux as it is not her series. You see the two parties parting ways, which do you think has the more compelling future? Furiosa who has reached her goal? Or Max? The ever wanderer?
TheMadThresher Dont play the dumb,you know what i mean by ''It started with Max''.Furry road may have started with Max.Only to put a gag on him and chain him for at least half of the movie.When he can talk,he didnt even talked.He just mumbled and growled.There was no Max in the movie.There was more Nux than Max in THAT movie.Emphasise on ''that movie''.I dont care about the future films.This movie wont have any effect on the next movie if there wont be any furiosa.So this is a seperate movie than future ones.
2:29 "Turn off the hoes."
exactly what i thought of xD
Not what I thought ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
InvincibleFury hose*
@@IfckedBrian r/woooosh
@@gachapluto696 nah, I got the joke its still properly hose.
Do "Pokémon: The First Movie."
Doug Puthoff Holy shit, I never realised how much I need to see an honest trailer of that before I read your comment.
+Doug Puthoff I cri evrytiem :'(
Doug Puthoff YEEEES
Doug Puthoff but its perfect
Doug Puthoff I would love to see that.
For those of you who boast how amazing Mad Max was, I have one thing to say......Waterworld.
It's nearly the EXACT same movie. Only instead of people on water looking for earth, there are people on earth, looking for water.
+Namron9797 You sir, just blew my mind.
+Namron9797 That's because Water World was inspired my Mad Max.
Meo AgCat
Waterworld- July 1995
Mad Max- May 2015
Namron9797 Dude, the first Mad Max movie came out in 1979, starred Mel Gibson.
Meo AgCat
Yes, but no one likes those movies. And those that even knew this was a franchise hail it as some new glorious thing that is revolutionary.
Guys, I can't read the text at 3:11, what does it say?
IPat Radude Dansetorm.
Good one lol
And Darude - Sandstorm.
It says "Sand King - Epicenter"
Corn I don't get the text though... What does it mean?
“What a spray, what a lovey spray” gets me every damn time
shiny and chrome
For those who complain about the little CGI that is used in the movie:
yeah it's used a few times but only when absolutely necessary. that is what CGI is for.
Tilairgan cough cough people who overuse cgi
I completely lost it when he said Powders
1:00 "the normal mel gibson got too mad to play". LMAO that face XD
*My Rebuttal to "Mad Max sucked" comments:*
1. If you are just a hipster that doesn't like something for sheer spite...please go study for your freshman midterm.
2. If you harp on the lack of dialogue or plot without doing a shred of research into the making of this movie or the thought process behind it then please do said research. George Miller intended to, from the beginning, make a action movie in it's purest form, striped of the gaudy dialogue, romance, and humor that had become endemic to the genre.
3. If you are a "true" Mad Max fan who only watches the first two movies out of some misguided hipster dogma, please refer to point 1.
4. If you are upset about the lack of continuity in the Max canon please refer to point 2.
+Midironica finally
+Midironica As someone who liked this movie, but not to the same extenct to which you idiotic fans keep trying to sell it:
1. Several professional critics disliked the movie; they certainly ain't freshmen.
2. Any artistic work (which movies *are*) must stand alone without any research. That you think it needs research is a point *against* the movie. Not to mention that creator's intent is also irrelevant when interpreting a work. So congratulations on highlighting flaws of the movie while trying to defend it.
3. Refer to point One.
4. Refer to point Two.
phylosacc tell me your favorite action movies, if you say avengers or some shit like that then your argument is invalid.
Andres Iniesta Not that my opinion would erase the fact that Death of the Author is a thing and that several critics disliked this movie which means that my points would stand regardless...
But my favorite action movies are Terminator 2, Die Hard and Aliens, so shut up, moron.
+Midironica 5. this movie tells it's story visually, not through dialogue.
And it still has a lot of compelling scenes, strong themes and clever moments that elevate the story beyond most other films
I feel like every movie can be judged by Immortan Joe.
Frozen Fever: MEDIOCRE.
Kingsman: MEDIOCRE.
+TheFourthReaper Kingsman was far from mediocre.
Bob Feen I know, it was a joke.
TheFourthReaper One cannot detect sarcasm or insincerity through the internet. Except Batman. Because he's Batman.
Bob Feen Fair.
+TheFourthReaper Frozen Fever is Music Video not Movie
I love how people say CGI sucks and use this movie to prove that point, not realizing the shit ton of CG that went into this film.
All practical can look like shit, all CG can look like shit. Put them together and it can look awesome.
***** Yes there was a lot of CG used. The didn't film in an actual lightning dust storm.
I wasn't remarking on any "point" that someone made, I clearly said "I love how *people* say CGI sucks" which I've heard a lot and people say.
I'll ask that you reread my comment because I said because "All practical can look like shit, all CG can look like shit. Put them together and it can look awesome" is in agreement with that point you were trying to make.
Is that more clear?
***** Lord of The Rings Return of The King did this brilliantly, this is how CGI should be used properly.
Bravo Kilo I don't care about CG or Practical effects. I care about action sequences you can follow for the first time! Really 90% of all the hollywood movies are Shacky Cam BS! Mad Max FTW!
Bravo Kilo Exactly it's not CGI that's a problem; it's overusing CGI and not using it to enhance effects. Most films go overboard with it and it looks a little fake when it's ALL CGI.
This has got to be one of Screen Junkies' best Honest Trailers. The intro alone is so good haha
"badass sharpshooting truck driver" ...hahahahahah lol
Still remains one of the best movies about going in a straight line and then needing to turn around
Hard R, ha 14a in Canada :p
+DoubleStep Gaming Because Canada is hard core.
+DoubleStep Gaming MA 15+ in Australia
pg13 in India
BenschMan2012 In Australia If a movie has heaps of violence it gets a M, MA, AV or R rating if it has nudity as well it gets a MA, AV, or R and if its a game with nudity R
+Vaughan Bunt Most movie theaters, including state-owned ones go lax on those, at least here in Finland, so I don't really care of it, fuck the police in all-risks-are-on-me situations. They don't really ID anyone here. I went to see K16 (that's the system here, K being for kielletty, _restricted_, and the number after being what you have to be in order to see it) when I was 14-15. But true, I think it is stupid that USA makes a curse word the biggest sin there is, but violence is no problem to 'em.
This movie was so freakin badass. Now I want tow atch it again.