FRM: Synthetic collateralized debt obligation (synthetic CDO)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • The key difference between a cash and synthetic CDO is: instead of selling the reference portfolio (loans), the originator (bank) purchases credit protection with credit default swaps (CDS).
    For more financial risk videos, visit our website! www.bionicturtl...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @bionicturtle
    @bionicturtle  16 років тому

    The high quality asset part is true, it's not the weak link. I don't disagree with your conclusion, but in order to identify good versus bad securitization (which after all is generally useful), we've got to first understand it. David

  • @ngopalakrishna
    @ngopalakrishna 13 років тому +1

    Sorry, but it is not clear why the bank will retain the riskiest piece of the whole tranches - the equity/residual tranche!!

  • @nickgiammarino1773
    @nickgiammarino1773 3 роки тому +4

    He goes into more detail than when Selena Gomez described it in THE BIG SHORT.

  • @zwarst
    @zwarst 15 років тому +9

    soon we shall say cd-oh dear...

  • @ngopalakrishna
    @ngopalakrishna 13 років тому

    Sorry, but it is not clear why the bank will retain the riskiest piece of the whole tranches - the equity/residual tranche!! Could you kindly elaborate pls? thank you!

  • @DuesenbergMusicGroup
    @DuesenbergMusicGroup 4 роки тому +2

    Such deep content

  • @sergpro
    @sergpro 13 років тому

    So synthetic CDOs expose investors to less risk than normal CDOs?

  • @uglybebeh88
    @uglybebeh88 9 років тому +2

    Hi. Can I ask, where does AIG fit in in this?

    • @yvan1401
      @yvan1401 9 років тому

      Hana Amin investor ;)

    • @uglybebeh88
      @uglybebeh88 9 років тому

      yvan1401 So this means that they sold CDS, and at the same time bought CDOs?

    • @Diyarish
      @Diyarish 8 років тому

      no. the banks sold the CDS, but they are not stupid. so they covered their asses through AIG. The banks were really just a passenger, receiving premiums of around 2.5% from the CDS buyer, but paying only 0.12% to AIG, it was just free money for the banks

    • @coreyf9363
      @coreyf9363 7 років тому

      Skywalker why was AIG so stupid though? they even start to understand their risk so they stopped selling CDS but did nothing to help their exposure on the previous ones they had out

  • @qudizzle1
    @qudizzle1 Рік тому +2

    instructions unclear, crashed the market

  • @dawiddomagala3980
    @dawiddomagala3980 Рік тому +1

    And I know what you're thinking. What the f... is a synthetic cdo?

  • @cruelpirate78
    @cruelpirate78 10 років тому

    Hey David, I think I get the answer in some reading. It says "balance sheet CDOs are more likely to retain the equity tranche to mitigate the adverse selection problem for skimming the higher quality assets from the collateral pool." Thoughts?

  • @ogape5833
    @ogape5833 3 роки тому

    soon

  • @agrazina1
    @agrazina1 12 років тому

    OTC. No underwriters

  • @thexdesk4341
    @thexdesk4341 4 роки тому +1

    #THeXDesK

  • @punk1player
    @punk1player 8 років тому +5

    Hi David, If you are long a synthetic CDO does that mean that you receive the premiums from the Credit Default Swaps and essentially go long the credit?

    • @rahuldhond6051
      @rahuldhond6051 5 років тому +2

      Yes. If you are long on synthetic CDOs, then you will get money if the referenced securities perform.
      That money for you comes as
      a) interest payments (for "funded" long investors who paid in cash to buy the synthetic CDOs) and
      b) premium payments (for "unfunded" long investors who keep receiving premiums till the synthetic CDO performs. But they would have to pay if the referenced securities deteriorated beyond a certain point).
      So yes, if you are long on a synthetic CDO, you will make money.
      If you are "short" investor on a synthetic CDO then you will make money if the referenced securities failed.

  • @macallanvintage
    @macallanvintage 11 років тому +1

    Setting up SPVs should never be allowed for any investment banks.
    If the investment is not allowed by law to engage in certain activities, the setting up of SPVs merely is a tactic to bypass/avert the law.

  • @CaesarRIO
    @CaesarRIO 8 років тому +2

    people are so sick for money

  • @InfiniteQuasars
    @InfiniteQuasars 9 років тому +1

    Few doubts:-
    1.What is the source of P&I payments to investors? Will CDS premiums paid by originators and returns from high quality assets be enough to compensate the investors? CDS premiums are small compared to the money that has to be given to the investors and also return from risk free assets will be less than what they have to give to subordinate notes and residual.
    2.So does the payment on loans stay with the originator and he just transfers the credit risk? He can simply buy a CDS for it.Why to get into trouble of getting into this synthetic CDO business?
    3.Where does trustee get money to buy risk free high quality asset and what are the incentives for it?
    This video was not as clear as the balance sheet CDO one. Anyone with clarity kindly explain. Thanks

  • @agrazina1
    @agrazina1 12 років тому +3

    synthetic CDOs = more counterparty risk than normal CDOs but can be written/purchased on third parties for notional values

    • @axe863
      @axe863 6 місяців тому

      Extremely increased systemic risk especially when coupled with highly leveraged critical agents in scale-free finance networks... increases risk carrying capacity in a stable regime but increases fire sale complexity in an unstable regime

  • @ioannislazaridis4887
    @ioannislazaridis4887 4 роки тому +2

    Excellent explanation ! Thank you sir .

  • @OudPlayerHBY
    @OudPlayerHBY 3 роки тому

    This monstrosity almost ended capitalism

  • @jwinaykumar
    @jwinaykumar 9 років тому +1

    In this structure, the assets are not sold to the trustee thereby not removing them from the orignator's balance sheet. IN that case, how is this structure termed as Balance-sheet Synthetic CDO?

    • @ceotype6
      @ceotype6 5 років тому

      Maybe the balance sheet, the cdo is on is the originators. And that's why it has balance sheet in the name.

    • @Arpit9614
      @Arpit9614 5 років тому

      SPVs are non balance sheet items

  • @cruelpirate78
    @cruelpirate78 10 років тому

    David, how come the bank keeps the residual (equity) tranche. Doesn't that mean having your cake and eating it too, in the sense that, they stand to gain the most from the payoffs accruing from the assets, yet they're also protected via the CDS that if they go bust they'll be covered... how is this conflict of interest tolerated? any thoughts on that? Thanks

  • @simonfrater
    @simonfrater 13 років тому

    Ngopalakrishna, if the bank is exposed to the riskiest piece, it acts as a measure to ensure that the bank (originator) doesn't fill the asset pool with assets that are like

  • @hasancoool
    @hasancoool 11 років тому

    Why does the senior tranche receive anything at all? They have not invested anything. Why should they get any return?

    • @jakelaxton7869
      @jakelaxton7869 6 років тому +1

      Mehfooz Husein They do invest their money, they get a lower interest rate because they get paid first.

  • @simonfrater
    @simonfrater 13 років тому

    ....likely to default, as they would lose out if this happened

  • @lalocamd
    @lalocamd 15 років тому

    Thanks so much for this. I have gained a good knowledge of what all the NEWS is about. This reminds me of how craps is played in Vegas. Regarding your illustration - I found it very easy to follow. It reminds me of a biochemical enzyme cascade (Those are REALLY cool!!!) :)

  • @ngopalakrishna
    @ngopalakrishna 12 років тому

    Aaah, that makes it clear now.. Thank you for replying..

  • @conormacneill8284
    @conormacneill8284 Рік тому

    So synthetic CDOs are basically securitized insurance contracts where cash flows from premiums take the place of cash flows from principal/interest from regular CDOs?

    • @johnknox6023
      @johnknox6023 Рік тому +1

      Yep, they're CDOs made up from the insurance of those same CDOs. Put simply, betting on a bet. Fucking crazy. The market for insuring bonds was twenty times bigger than the bond market itself prior to the economic collapse of 2008.

    • @conormacneill8284
      @conormacneill8284 Рік тому +1

      @@johnknox6023 I sorta see the logic behind them from the originator's viewpoint. The people buying synthetic CDOs are basically taking the place of regular insurance providers. I think that this could mean more competition and lower premiums for originators. On its own it's actually a fairly good idea, I just think that degenerates took it a bit too far.
      I feel like some tech bro is eventually gonna apply the same principal and claim to "decentralize insurance" and do fairly well before it all blows up in their face & they go to jail for fraud.

    • @johnknox6023
      @johnknox6023 Рік тому

      @@conormacneill8284 Absolutely it was a good idea if everyone played by the rules, but they didn't. Largely the rating agencies in my opinion, who were literally selling AAA ratings on the CDOs to banks. (A bit unrelated to the synthetics, but same principle that underhanded stuff was going on)
      So yeah, a few more FTX Bankmans go to jail and we will see crypto be as heavily regulated as the rest of the finance industry.

  • @leejae
    @leejae 14 років тому

    Thanks for the explanation! It really helped out!

    • @lorenzoshawn7969
      @lorenzoshawn7969 3 роки тому

      I guess it's quite randomly asking but does anyone know of a good site to stream new series online?

    • @landonmisael9416
      @landonmisael9416 3 роки тому

      @Lorenzo Shawn I dunno I watch on flixportal. You can find it by googling:P -landon

    • @lorenzoshawn7969
      @lorenzoshawn7969 3 роки тому

      @Landon Misael thank you, I went there and it seems like they got a lot of movies there :D Appreciate it !!

    • @landonmisael9416
      @landonmisael9416 3 роки тому

      @Lorenzo Shawn No problem xD