Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine: Major Shift in Federal Regulatory Power
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 чер 2024
- In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has officially overturned the Chevron doctrine, fundamentally changing the landscape of federal regulatory power. This 6-3 ruling marks a significant victory for conservatives and business groups, limiting the authority of federal agencies and giving judges more power to interpret laws independently.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan offer starkly contrasting views on the implications of this decision, with debates raging about its impact on policy areas ranging from environmental regulations to student loan forgiveness. Will this lead to more legal consistency or chaos?
Join us as we break down the court's decision, its potential effects on federal regulations, and what this means for the future of administrative law in the United States.
#SupremeCourt #ChevronDoctrine #FederalRegulations #JohnRoberts #ElenaKagan #AdministrativeLaw #JudicialPower #EnvironmentalRegulations #StudentLoanForgiveness #LegalPrecedent #FederalAgencies #RegulatoryPower #LegalNews #ConservativeVictory
Finally. No more bureaucratic corruption by lawyers & thieves.
1:35 Lower courts interpreting the law.
Ok, do you job, and appeal it upwards if necessary.
What we had for the past 40 years is agencies giving themselves all manner of new powers to randomly change laws, often with very serious consequences for citizens. The ATF with bump stocks and pistol braces, turning legally bought purchases into felony possession items, are just 2 examples (and with no input from our representatives, as to whether the people want those laws enacted.) There are 2 people in prison right now for a drawing of a part said to do something, when it has never been demonstrated that it does in fact even do it. (Auto key card case)
Rules enforced about a drainage ditch behind a farm being a "navigable waterway" when it dries up in the summer, countless other over reaches of busy-body pencil pushers infringing on people's freedoms.
Yeah, we are going to see a lot of lawsuits, and rightfully so.
This ruling is a payback for all luxurious trips that SCOTUS justices had taken. No more regulations from federal agencies. A company's main goal is to maximize profit at any costs and has no problems destroying the environment. Litigation takes time and money and judgement might just be a slap on the wrist. Below is an example of a federal agency at work:
"In 1999, Royal Caribbean Cruises (RCL) agreed to pay $18 million after being hit with 21 federal felony charges for routinely dumping oil and untreated sewage back into the ocean."
Unelected officials do not get to make up laws. Period.
@@diclicious9100 Every time there is a change in the administration, there is a change in federal agents. In some way, they are indirectly selected. Just like the Electoral College system, we don't select our president directly.
@@vincenttiene unelected officials do not get to make up laws... period. The EPA has overstepped their bounds, the ATF has dramatically overstepped their bounds. Congress needs to be held accountable for the shelving of their responsibilty to these agencies. Congress needs to do their damn job. Period.
@@diclicious9100 At least what we got now is standardized/centralized/universal and is much easier to implement changes. With judges, it will be costly and outcome varies. Just like in a hospital, doctors are required to scrub, wear mask and gloves before an operation. Without standard procedures, doctors could go bare hands on a pelvic exam. lol.
@@vincenttiene the "standard procedures" were predicated on a unconstitutional fallacy. Changing laws is supposed to be hard and time consuming. Rapid change in laws brings about chaos and political corruption. Hence why we have a constitutional republic with democratic practices and not Democracy. It took 40 years to get rid of Roe v Wade and 4 decades to get rid of Cheveron Defference. These items were unconstitutional. The system worked to get rid of them but again it took 40 years. While i do wish the system would work faster, there is a reason for its design. I can only hope congress will step up and take back their power from the exexutive branch. Lets get back to Federalisim!!
I dont want anyone interpreting anything.
Federal Laws are the good Laws. We have great Federal Laws.