I am an American, and have spent a grand total of two and a half days in London, but I devoted the entirety of one of those days visiting the "Keats House" in Hampstead Heath, where John Keats composed "Ode to a Nightingale." It was a day well-spent, and I thought I felt Keats' presence. To see original letters that he wrote, with his signature below them was a breathtaking experience. I believe that, after Shakespeare, he is the greatest poet in the English language.
Prof Belinda's Commentary is laudable for more than one reason. She speaks to the sophomore in the audience as well as the blasé geriatric in the last row who is steeped in the quasi-decadent romanticism of the short-lived epigones who pined for the 'desire of the moth for the star'. Belinda seamlessly foregrounds the graphic imagery of the ode against vignettes from Keats' life and the analects from his letters which define the lightness of his poetic vision so vascular you could incise it with the petal of a rose. A bouquet for Prof Belinda please !
Timeless prophet! And thanks also for the insightful interpretation from both Belinda and Gresham College (Wow, since 1597?). Now internet magnifies your efforts in raising human consciousness exponentially, boundlessly! Thanks for such beautiful works.
Hang on. I have a spotty education and often listen to academic talks on poetry. This one has wonderful insights about Keats and Negative Capability and uncertainty. Thank you Dr. Belinda Jack for sharing your knowledge and exquisite sensitivity, I have done a little research on nightingales, and so I have to question the assertion that you would hear what Keats heard. I am going to loosely quote from a PBS program on bird songs. The nightingale has 300 different love songs. So while the repertoire might be the same or highly similar, your chances just went down of hearing the same song. The program was Life of Birds/Songs. An aside: Perhaps of interest, I read about Woolf hearing the nightingale sing in Greek, not literally, of course, but it was disturbing to her when she was in a troubled state of mind. There is a website that will change a phrase you type in into "nightingale" song.
My uncle, who was much enamoured of poetry, would, from time to time and à propos of nothing in particular, quote a line from some poem. Once many years ago after a meal he quoted "She stood in tears amid the alien corn". I was greatly struck and hastened to find and learn the ode. It has been with me ever since.
I sort half agree with the interpretation of the nightingale's immortality as opposed to the human species. As already mentioned the bird is immortal for not being aware of death and the knowledge of the brain and therefore another nightingale will continue the singing after the previous one is dead. The species is connected beyond intellect. As to the poet, his half knowledge doesn't allow such privilege and the individuality of humans is one cause of our mortality. However, through poetry one can achieve this communion and never die. I am not sure it's got anything to do with the evolutionary aspect of the nightingale's song but rather its unawareness of death.
after all his wonderful and enlightening instruction and suggestion on how one should create poetry, I came to find keats a bit more stiff, a tad less fluid(lubricated)than others I've read: Tennyson; Whitman. great lecture!!!!
There's a trend currently of people when asked a question to begin their reply with "So . . ." I wish they wouldn't. Or in order that they get the message, "So I wish they wouldn't". To those who would term me pedantic, I offer this; the speaker is an expert in the English language, she should bleeding well know better.
Could someone help me out at minutes 44.20 what is she exactly saying? I cannot understand the word she uses. After starting to list the features that make the poem so very effective she mentions the alliterations of P, D and Ms, which evoke .............? I can't understand the word she uses!
why does she keep looking at her notes. I would have thought that she would know all there is to know. I can understand her using her notes as leaders but not every word. I
This is why many academics make for poor teachers. She lacks the passion and the ability to make connections between the poem and concepts to which today's students can relate. She is clearly knowledgeable, but this type of presentation is not going to turn someone on to Keats or to poetry in general.
I was just thinking about something similar, why law school is boring and awful but undergrad was great: the professors I had in undergrad were clearly passionate about the subject.
I am an American, and have spent a grand total of two and a half days in London, but I devoted the entirety of one of those days visiting the "Keats House" in Hampstead Heath, where John Keats composed "Ode to a Nightingale." It was a day well-spent, and I thought I felt Keats' presence. To see original letters that he wrote, with his signature below them was a breathtaking experience. I believe that, after Shakespeare, he is the greatest poet in the English language.
Prof Jack is my most favourite for her critical analysis of poetry.
A wonderful lecture - opened my eyes (and ears) to this wonderful poem. Thank you. Betsy
Fantastic lecture, I will be listening to it repeatedly
Fantastic - in a dreamy half-light the song gently brushed against my very soul and transformed it into beautiful melodious air. Thank you.
Stephen Bainbridge
Prof Belinda's Commentary is laudable for more than one reason. She speaks to the sophomore in the audience as well as the blasé geriatric in the last row who is steeped in the quasi-decadent romanticism of the short-lived epigones who pined for the 'desire of the moth for the star'.
Belinda seamlessly foregrounds the graphic imagery of the ode against vignettes from Keats' life and the analects from his letters which define the lightness of his poetic vision so vascular you could incise it with the petal of a rose. A bouquet for Prof Belinda please !
An outstanding critical analysis by a brilliant lady professor . Thank you a lot
This is amazing!The poem recording was superb!!!
Timeless prophet! And thanks also for the insightful interpretation from both Belinda and Gresham College (Wow, since 1597?). Now internet magnifies your efforts in raising human consciousness exponentially, boundlessly! Thanks for such beautiful works.
Hang on. I have a spotty education and often listen to academic talks on poetry. This one has wonderful insights about Keats and Negative Capability and uncertainty. Thank you Dr. Belinda Jack for sharing your knowledge and exquisite sensitivity,
I have done a little research on nightingales, and so I have to question the assertion that you would hear what Keats heard. I am going to loosely quote from a PBS program on bird songs. The nightingale has 300 different love songs. So while the repertoire might be the same or highly similar, your chances just went down of hearing the same song. The program was Life of Birds/Songs.
An aside: Perhaps of interest, I read about Woolf hearing the nightingale sing in Greek, not literally, of course, but it was disturbing to her when she was in a troubled state of mind.
There is a website that will change a phrase you type in into "nightingale" song.
Yes I m totally with you dear...
The Heart of True Warrior
A wonderful and insightful lecture! She helped me understand the depths of this poem and has given me a new appreciation of it.
Fantastic lecture 👍
Keats has awell established reputation
Lovely woman, lovely execution; pure elegance ...
Died at 25. Far, far too early. He was wrong though, fortunately his name was definitely not writ in water
My uncle, who was much enamoured of poetry, would, from time to time and à propos of nothing in particular, quote a line from some poem. Once many years ago after a meal he quoted "She stood in tears amid the alien corn". I was greatly struck and hastened to find and learn the ode. It has been with me ever since.
Thanks. Very moving.
I sort half agree with the interpretation of the nightingale's immortality as opposed to the human species. As already mentioned the bird is immortal for not being aware of death and the knowledge of the brain and therefore another nightingale will continue the singing after the previous one is dead. The species is connected beyond intellect. As to the poet, his half knowledge doesn't allow such privilege and the individuality of humans is one cause of our mortality. However, through poetry one can achieve this communion and never die. I am not sure it's got anything to do with the evolutionary aspect of the nightingale's song but rather its unawareness of death.
Eleanor Rigby I agree
Loved the lecture! Who read the poem? I couldn't catch his surname
after all his wonderful and enlightening instruction and suggestion on how one should create poetry, I came to find keats a bit more stiff, a tad less fluid(lubricated)than others I've read: Tennyson; Whitman. great lecture!!!!
Fantastic lecture
Hei big guy, i have NOT gone away or left or disappeared. I am still here, loving you as always.
They don't write them like that anymore. Such a pity.
There's a trend currently of people when asked a question to begin their reply with "So . . ."
I wish they wouldn't. Or in order that they get the message, "So I wish they wouldn't".
To those who would term me pedantic, I offer this; the speaker is an expert in the English language, she should bleeding well know better.
Excellent.
good one!
🤦🏻♀️噢 天呐 我的耳朵怀孕了 🌸🌸🌸from 17:40 🐠🐠🐠I fell in love with his voice 😘😘😘
Could someone help me out at minutes 44.20 what is she exactly saying? I cannot understand the word she uses.
After starting to list the features that make the poem so very effective she mentions the alliterations of P, D and Ms, which evoke .............? I can't understand the word she uses!
Ok I just saw there is a transcription of the lecture!
What are you saying dear? She is speaking about John Keats...
10:52 I really thought of keats
Moving
38:00
LiViTY
why does she keep looking at her notes. I would have thought that she would know all there is to know. I can understand her using her notes as leaders but not every word. I
This is why many academics make for poor teachers. She lacks the passion and the ability to make connections between the poem and concepts to which today's students can relate. She is clearly knowledgeable, but this type of presentation is not going to turn someone on to Keats or to poetry in general.
I was just thinking about something similar, why law school is boring and awful but undergrad was great: the professors I had in undergrad were clearly passionate about the subject.
Depends on the academic, of course. We're not all the same!
:D
janna 😂😂
thank god she doesn't lecture at my school
Negative Capability is a destructive, antichristian teaching/philosophy. No wonder God punished Keats for his heresies with consumption.
The idea that the Christian God would punish anyone with consumption is rather more anti-Christian and heretical than negative capability
For reference, see John 9, Augustine (Enchiridion), Aquinas (De Malo), David Bentley Hart (Where was God in the Tsunami)...