Meet Iran's New Stealth Fighter Jet - The Conqueror F313
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 тра 2024
- How To Play With Me
- First, get the game War Thunder with a bonus here: playwt.link/foundandexplained
- Do the tutorial so you know how to play.
- Add me @FoundExplained in the game
and during the live stream, I will pick some random names from the list, open a server and invite you.
- I will be playing every weekend at different times, so everyone will get a go.
New 3D editing computer thanks to Ironside Computers: IronsideComputers.com
use code: "FoundExplained5" for 5% off your own PC!
www.foundandexplained.com
NEW CHANNEL:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained
The IAIO Qaher-313 is a planned Iranian single-seat stealth fighter aircraft that was publicly announced on 1 February 2013. It is described as a stealth fighter constructed of advanced materials, with very low radar signature and the ability to operate at low altitudes.
It’s so stealthy, in fact, that no one will ever see one in the air.
funny
Noone will see it at air bases either
Iranian military guy on TV "BUT BUT its there, you just cant see it thats how good it is DEATH TO AMERICA!"
just like alasad trump of headace nothing else
Just like they said Iran cant make drones?😚
You know whats most impressive about this video? That they made a CGI model where a pilot actually fits in the cockpit, unlike the "real" life version of this Iranian jet
...the small size of the cockpit makes me think this thing is actually a suicide bomber, manned by a child soldier...
...a stealthy "Martyr's Bomber" carrying a couple of suitcase nukes...
Just like the drones it used :)
🤣🤣
@@miklosernoehazy8678 Well thank you for that lovely image. I was worried I would sleep soundly tonight......
But yeah I really would not put it passed the Iranian government.
Sure but those Iranian Drones that blew up Himars in Ukraine were CGI too ? 😂
Manual control is an advantage since it is immune from electronic jamming.
This fighter actually looks perfect for dog fights which is needed for defending a land rather than attacking as does the US.
I remember the time people saying Iranian ballistic missiles were Photoshop.... Now Iran has one of the most diverse and biggest arsenals in the world. Same as the Iranian drone inventory.
Absolutely finally and unbiased comment
And Iraq had the 4th largest military in the world lol
The Iranians have cheap knock offs of cheap knock offs of cheap knock offs.
From the days of F-16, planes become impossible to control by a human anymore, since you need surgically accurate inputs to get things done.
@@AIMI4U f16 is designed to be unstable by choice
We might laugh at them, but i will give their engineers and mechanics props for keeping the oldies flying till now
Sure I give props to Cuba's mechanics for keeping their cars going but that is mostly a testament to American car quality in the 60's. And I still wouldn't bet that Cuba can make a F1 car.
Tbh as an aircraft designer the intakes on the top with no s ducts is not a huge issue. They will be mainly shielded by ground radar, the more concerning issue would be boundary layer ingestion into the engine. Considering this is an issue that still plagues nations with far bigger budgets I would have to pull the bs card on this design.
another thing i think is angle of attack the engines will bo stalled
The plane must have literally no high alpha qualities other than dropping like a stone. That's speaking as an aero engineer (qualified as one, not working as one!) Overall, it's not a serious project and seems to be designed for its own domestic audience to feel proud about. What else could it be?
Something tells me the intakes look like that because it might not be a supersonic jet. The engines may still be the Iranian Owj turbojet with afterburners but just like the mig17, those afterburners are just there for some extra thrust for better payload capacity for take-off and climb rate. Not really for sustained supersonic flight.
Where can we check out your work? Or should I pull the BS card on you?
Much like the rivet problem of the SU-57.....
It's a very stealthy aircraft, because it will stay on the runway doing taxi tests all day long!
Not even that. It just is there. Made of cardboard.
People are so mean to non superpower countries
@@bobman36 bear in mind, this machine is designed to kill people, too
@@bobman36 just be a superpower, stoopid
As their kamikaze drones?😜
The advantage of losing a fly-by-wire system is that in the event of an EMP, whether generated from a nuclear detonation or otherwise, means that the pilot could keep flying whereas the control might be knocked out for other pilots depending on the protection of their aircraft!
...still there are at least 200 orher vital systems in that jet that are very susceptible to EMP.
Don't make comments with common sense &impartial logic.. it's not allowed around here
Not keep flying, but able to perform a controlled glide to the ground instead of uncontrolled tumbling out of the sky. Every other computer controlled system in the plane would be knocked out, but at least the stick will still move the control surfaces.
This was my idea as well. Makes total sense.
The reason for broken wings is use of ground effect , its makes the fighter be able to fly stably fly at very low altitude
This tiny thingy looks more like a drone where someone decided to put a pilot inside.
It is that. Just a mock-up using the drone they were able to steal.
@@jaanikaapa6925 Naw, they just built it based on a model they found from SketchUp
It looks like a finch
Is the more likely scenario! Trying to build an air industry around a sole crashed U.S drone tech perhaps?
@@jaanikaapa6925 Yup :)
_'we don't need fly-by-wire'_
So, you don't _have_ fly-by-wire?
...
Yup most probably because they can't source one i think
The Russian method:
"It's not a bug, it's a feature! "
"Hey, why would you pull wires instead of using a stick and a hotas like everyone to pilot this thing anyway?"
pretty hard to make one out of cardboard and Fiver 3D models.
What america x36 do😂
As always very well explained thank you.😊
I'm telling you brother, it doesn't matter to me how efficient this jet is going to be.
And apart from laughing on these military innovations just because of their Irani origin, I think the design of this jet is super cool. 👍
Iran is really creative and in terms of drones like Shahed 136 & Mohajer 6 are not only creative but also very effective.
Creative is not the word I'd use to call a bunch of Ali Express flying roombas with plastic explosives ductapped to the underside.
@@supermaster2012you haven't seen those drones
@@kaizer7568 they have been downed over Ukraine and they are literally Ali Express garbage ductaped together with chinesium tape. They run a Chinese clone of a raspberry pi 2b but with only 2 a56 cores. The camera is 480p and can only pan 5 degrees, no gimbal or stabilizer. The lipo battery is the most dangerous part of the air roomba.
@@supermaster2012 as I said you haven't seen them. The Iranian drones have proven to be more effective and very cheap. Do you know why Ukraine stopped using Bayraktar, because they were useless against the Russians
@@supermaster2012Better look for a picture of a Shahed drone online. They aren't poor built are you say
Here’s the thing: if they go even further into the anhedral design, specifically making the wings hull wings, they’ll get a few advantages. Of those that I can remember off the top of my head: a) the ability to shield underwing external stores from radar and b) by using gull wings in conjunction with all-moving wing tips, one can eliminate the need for the vertical tail and rudders. Furthermore, all-moving wing tips can ease design complexity and reduce maintenance costs by moving all wing surface controls to the wingtips, which also has the added benefit of increased roll performance. In terms of the air intakes, they could theoretically could’ve put radar baffles in the air intakes and we just can’t see them, but this is just me spitballing at this point
Requesting videos on the following:
-switchblade aircraft designs such as the FA-37 Talon from the ‘05 movie “Stealth” or the X-02 Wyvern from the Ace Combat franchise
-Super Tomcat-21 and ASF-14
-the NATF program as a whole
-early ATF proposals
-Sea Apache
-F-20 Tigershark
-Bae SABA
-Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Technology Bomber proposal
It honestly looks like the Sukhoi Su47 (the plane with backward wings) except they made the wings normal
the SU47 had forward swept wings
only similar thing is the color
I'm Iranian. This thing is just a hoax.
All of the budget is directed toward missiles and drones. Including stealth drones.
And So far is working. I mean HIMARS is like our fateh missile and the drones are just ours!!! So... I can't fault them for not focusing on manned jets
@Toni Dinh I can't wait to see it in the rain
Itu bukani Sukhoi Su47
This is a UCAV the pilot is there for the proof of concept and development. The camera pod is a test equipment used for flight test and development. Fo rthe serial production you can be sure it will be removed. The UCAV is a top hemisphere stealthy. It will be used to approach AWACS and fire a missile. It will fly in formation with F5s in an air to ground role. There is a posiibility that it will be able to take off from the lakes rivers etc in case the runways are destroyed by the enemy. Thus the intakes are where they are, over the wing. In that case the wing tips can be used for steering in the water. Since it will be used for ground attack it has to have combat survivability against shoulder fire missiles and AAA -at low level flight nothing is stealthy - so fly by wire is not an option. The intake are shielded by the wings against ground radar. The original version probably served as a glider for the proof of concept.
At least in race cars, We drivers like to avoid any drive by wire inputs as this increases the amount of feedback we get through the controls, allowing us to have a better feel for the car. I assume the lack of fly by wire controls on this jet is there for a similar reason. Giving the pilot a better feel for his aircraft and the air around him.
Hmm, when discussing the inlets for the engines, two things come to mind:
First of all, yes, they are rather small, but so are the engines. And unless building am combination of RAM jet and conventional turbo jet/turbo fan with afterburner, small engines don´t require large intakes.
Second, the hightend position of the intakes should be rather effective against ground based radar, since they can hardly be seen from below. Therefore, the designers might have had a higher interest in optimizing the stealth characteristics concerning ground radar compared to airbased radar systems.
Finally, there was the question of why it might be wanted to be wanted to have a plane with the capability of using manual controls instead of a fly-by-wire system.
First of all, this means that there is a high degree of redundancy and savety: A plane, that can be flow manually, will be more likely to survive once the electronics fail, e.g. when being hit by bullets or shrapnel or as a result of an EMP: not every country has EMP hardened electronics at hand.
These two aspects of the design make me wonder, if the aircraft might be a ground attacker and/ or optimized of use in a conflict that includes nuclear weapons.
Again, the FBW system is only 1 of hundreds of systems in the jet. Unless this is just a reskinned pre-coldwar jet, an EMP will kill everything in the jet except the ability to control the glide to the ground. Not exactly helpful. But as you said, when the iranian electronics likely fail, the pilot would be able to still control what is left still functioning on the jet.
your comment is actually very funny. the only way this piece of junk will ever get off the ground is if you push it off a cliff
Ground attack? With two bombs of capacity and no internal guns? Nah. If anything it's an interceptor, but they didn't properly plan for decreasing the signature other aircraft's radar. But I'm leaning hard towards it being fake or nearly completely useless.
It's so stealthy that we haven't even seen it at all (other than the taxiing tests from mock ups)
@JZ's BFF I mean, canvas and plywood was used for the Horten Ho 229 which had a smaller radar cross section than a Spitfire or Mustang. The materials absorb radar waves instead of bouncing them back i think
@JZ's BFF dummy or fake vehicles are still being used for deception as of today. Like Ukrainians are using wooden mock ups of HIMARS launchers and inflatable tanks to deceive the Russians
@JZ's BFF Japan lost terribly
@JZ's BFF you the one sitting up here pretending like Japan was this great deceiver they didn't even realize their codes had been broken just like Iran ain't got nowhere neat a stealth fighter
you only see what u want to see, quite obviously
Your answer about all manual control: extreme sanction levels cause the high shortage in any kind of hightech gadgets.
Don’t forget that Iran lost one F-14 in the hands of Tom Cruise 😂😂
Mf just strolled up and was like “Hey who left the keys in here”
And the rest were taken out by cruise missiles!
I like how the Iranian airbase guards are so stupid they didn't think Maverick and Rooster were sus running around the tarmac in obvious American gear.
@@vindictivegrind9370 maybe not-I was thinking about this, and part of their MO is to copy us Americans, so perhaps their flight suits are similar and they color their helmets to look cool.
In American propaganda movies, the enemy is always an idiot and the keys are always in the ignition.
I would love to know what happens when you fly at increased angle of attack and the air stalls in the inlets. Be that is what will happen. You will suffocate the engines and stall them, then you stall and pancake into the desert at terminal (for you) velocity.
Ahh, the boundary layer effect. The nemesis of aircraft designers the world over!
Come on Man never mind angle of attack. The thing doesn’t exist and it was made of potty’s And even Potty fell apart after 6 months
The rest of the world: We want our jets to be stealthy and be supermaneuverable so that it can do the Pugachev's Cobra and the falling leaf...
Iran: I want a jet with funny angles
Iran is built different
what if it climbs backwards? Like upside down? Like the space shuttle?
I was just coming into the comments to say that! It'll choke the engines out due to lack of air. So either this aircraft is BS or they plan to NEVER aggressively climb or dogfight. I'm going with the former. It's all nonsense with mockups to look like they're advanced without putting any money or effort into it. It worked for soviet Russia, but it's definitely not gonna work for them.
1. The Q-313 will only be produced in UCAV unmanned variant so it will most definitely have a fly by wire system but a manned version will NOT be produced
2. The advantages of not requiring a fly by wire system are 1. A more durable platform against EMP, directed energy weapons & during system failures. 2. A cheaper platform if no fly by wire is installed. Not requiring a fly by wire doesn't necessarily mean you don't have one it just means you can fly the platform without one.
The main disadvantage of not requiring a fly by wire means you had to sacrifice maneuverability to build such a platform.
With the Q313 Iran wanted a Low Cost (Under $10M USD) Low RCS (stealthy) platform equipped with an internal weapons bay that would be both capable of PGM strikes & be used a as a mule for Iran's IADS.
The Q313 uses 2 cheap engines that combined cost less than $1M, Iran also used off the shelf commercial avionics built around a composite sub sonic platform the reduced the aircrafts Titanium requirements and lack of an advanced radar also helped further reduced cost.
With advancements Iran has had in AI and UCAV technology Iran feels no need to put a pilot in the craft allowing for further reduction in cost by removing a million usd ejection seat, cockpit gear & canopy. This could allow Iran to achieve a production costs below $5 Million USD on a far stealthier platform.
I think that the wierd wingtips are becaose of shockwave like it was on XB-70 Valkire. yk, creating more lift in supersonic speeds by trapping shockwave.
Hypothetically speaking, I think the reason why the Iranians probably went for manual controls is that they might be aware/afraid that they lack the sufficient means to counter advanced electronic warfare systems that many modern fighters are equipped with.
Their domestic missiles, drones and loitering munitions obviously have no manual controls as they lack pilots. Seems weird to trust missiles to not suffer from EW and then fear that electronic shielding is insufficient.
I think it's more the recognition that they lack software engineers capable of designing the system. Ew isnt much of a threat to fly by wire.
I wonder if it is to allow them to fly through an EMP?
@@bluesnjax9134 this is a more likely scenario, but it seems like a really outdated way to handle the problem. However it would be an economical way to handle it. My question is, why would that be such a concern for the designers of this plane? Nuclear bombs are the only realistic source of an emp powerful enough to disrupt fly by wire. Is Iran developing a tiny short range stealth strategic bomber? This would match up well with the mechanical controls and air intake location.
@@Typexviiib I dont know shit about EMPS but wouldnt that fry the aircrafts APU and it would lose power supply for ignition of fuel? I would imagine all electronics would be useless making the fighter only good for landing or unguided gun runs and MAYBE un guided bombs or rockets if they also designed them to not need electronic control systems. Radar would fry i think too. IR and radar seeker heads in your missiles would be toast. But I guess if you can get the aircraft home safely it can be repaired and used again.
Iran has passed its test in ballistic missiles, drones, tanks, be sure that it will perform in the best way in fighter jets as well.
Iran's F313 is very similar to China's FC31, I believe it is a Chinese fighter and Iran wants to assemble it. And China has given the technology of this fighter to Iran.
Usually an analog control is meant to provide necessary cueing and feedback to the pilot.
YUP!! I also made a stealth aircraft which flys at the Hypersonic speed and I keep it in my latrine.
Iran already sort of does have stealth jets, but they're unmanned, few in numbers, and fewer of them are actually armed with nothing more than air to ground weapons.
Not to say they couldn't design a stealth fighter of their own, but it'll take a lot of resources and time to do so, even if they have technical assistance from China and Russia.
you mean the Ali Express flying suicide roombas?
@@supermaster2012 No, like actual surveillance drones like the Shahed 171 Simorgh and Shahed Saegheh. They both come in armed and unarmed configurations and are both probably flying over Ukraine right now in support of Russian troops. Most military drones use a lot of off the shelf equipment to reduce costs, since most military drones are meant to be disposable anyway.
@@dave_riots aka terrorist renamed Ali Express drones.
@@dave_riots You're too smart to be down here.
Interesting, as an aeronautical engineer I am not entirely convinced by the overall design. There are some aspects to this concept in that it at least gives countries venturing into this area of aerial defence a platform from which to build on. Right now, I think they are a good few years away from service.
As an aeronautical engineer, what is your hot take on this thing being a bunch of cardboat ductapped to an F5? Because that's what it is...
The wingtip pointing down is the same as wingtip pointing up on F-4. And albatross wing has been a concept for a long time. They could have gotten it from boeing, or not, because there's multiple ways to come to that, you can't know untill you ask them.
Regardless of if the aircraft is real or not a manual control option can be an advantage if electromagnetic defence systems are used
You mean the thing (not plane) that taxis around with the pilots knees above the canopy rail?
Yeah this dude will do anything to make a video
This wasn't even a jet
That pilot was part of the Iranian Revolutionary Basketball Team
Iran Air force should stick to Drones.
The Conqueror F313 is so stealthy, nobody will ever see one flying.
Just as Iranians didn't saw stealth drone RQ170 flying.
OH WAIT?
They did and they stole it from stupid overconfident Yanks, landed it in the middle of their air base and inspected the entire thing screw by screw.
Now they spanking Ukraine so hard on it's arse, that type of red hot glow is sufficient to bake a cake. HAHA!
Just like you said about shaheed drone
@@based_asian.2119 damn
O K, guys. We could call it "conqueror, or P.O.S. Mark VI.
You will see its (as a stealth drone) flying over some EU countries soon. ☺️🇮🇷💌
I actually like the airframe design but what doesn't make sense to me is the position of the intake. From the front you can see these rectangular profiles on the sides. This is where I would expect the intakes to be. The inlets are too small for a twin jet, they could work for a single engine design though. The airframe itself would work if this was rectified
Funny note, just after you made the comment about the manual control surfaces there was an animated shot of the plane taking off.
In this shot a naca duct is clearly visible, these are theoretically low drag intake ducts(haven't seen a lot of experimentation).
But why this is funny, particularly with manual controls is that these ducts don't work trans or supersonic. Which would limit the craft to about 600mph if that duct does anything important.
you only see what u want to see, quite obviously
@@randyeduo brother what?
About the only advantage i could think of not having fly by wire is that it becomes moderately less susceptible to EMPs (which currently can only be generated by high altitude nukes, so… i think you’d have other issues)
you're forgetting the obvious advantage, that you can't make a fly by wire system out of cardboard.
It's due to sanctioned computer chips. It's really not that hard to understand.
Confiança é tudo. se você não acredita, jamais conquistará, Nós acreditamos nos irmãos iranianos!🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
tanks man .respect from iran this american are really arrogance
🇮🇷🇮🇷🙏
🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thanks,but terrorist sepah whit this shit and so much things like that becomes a shame for our nation 😂
It's a two-thirds Revell model of an imaginary airplane. Oh, those intakes on the top of the wing? Good luck at high angles of attack at getting any air into the engines.
This concept is pretty dope🔥
Love this guy video great job mate keep it up 👍👌
Probably the only jet that was laughed out of existance.
Its so stealthy, ot has not been seen in almost a decade 😁
I'm certainly laughing at the silly premise of this video...Iran is now gonna go from 50 year old F-14's with no replacement parts to stealth? While under heavy sanctions... right, and I have a bridge to sell too. Silly stuff for idiots is what this channel produces.
LOL! North Korea's military projects are more believable than this Iranian crap.
Listen, if Iran has that jet, it will create the most deadly surprise attack after 9/11 😟
@@michaelwheeler2275 Iran has tiny little plastic boats and a bunch of missiles, that's about it. I'm more afraid of my neighbors dog (he's a Chihuahua) than I am of anything Iran has in its military.
@@michaelfried3123 Iran does have its own locally made frigates and semi heavy submarines. They also made what seems to be a reverse engineered version of the Russian supercavitating torpedo. Something the US Navy doesn't have.
U can underestimate them all u want, but it aint smart to underestimate someone that much.
It’s so stealthy and “homemade” that you won’t even see it in real life! Woah!!!
I’m loving these comments
yeah
they said our drones are Photoshop and toys ten yrs ago
you keep taking we keep building
@@ranginkamoonebirang1009 I have always been amazed by Iran's drone development but your questionable profile picture makes it hard for me to believe you are not a government bot. Seriously, are you that petty regarding Israel?
@@josephc.9520 they own the media thats why you think they are not bad
its an old saying that a jew will hit you while crying and screaming like they are being hit
they killed our scientists people snd still are attacking our country none stop they literally support separatists against my country
why should i be a government bot to hate the enemy?!
actually my profile is not even 1% of what i really feel about them
@@ranginkamoonebirang1009 Building 10 thousand dollar drones are different then building stealth aircrafts my guy 😂
It is a sea patroll and attack plane, with only enough tech to fly low and hit ships on the sea surface. A sworm of them could get close enough to a carrier and sink it.
I'm so glad u mentioned that drone...gift from #44..just gave it to them
For high altitude nuke EMP, it would be the most advanced operational fighter jet in the air in such a case.
Actually just about every US military aircraft will still be flying. And even a lot of consumer electronics and just about every car will also. You'd be surprised about just how much stuff has to be protected from electromagnetic interference.
Except every other electrical system, like the fuel pumps etc woukd still go down, guess itll be a pretty cool glider though 😅
They decided to power it with engines America designed in 1956 for the T-38 trainer,later becoming the F-5 tiger☺️probably the best part of the plane 😄
Hey at least it will probably emit less IR signature. Now concealing it is another story.
you only see what u want to see, quite obviously--thats why u cn;t see the fact of the matter
One military expert of my country (i do not remember the name) said that the design of the jet's thrust nozzles (or what am i talking about, there are no nozzles at all) propably is catastrophic, he theorized that when turning afterburner on the whole aircraft would ignite because of the hot afterburner flames making contact with the aircraft's stealth paint.
can be for multiple reasons why its manual, but mostly for easy control when the airplane electric system is shut down but by an EMP can still control it manually also its cheaper for production. also not hackable .
Lol amazing what you can do with an F5, some cardboard boxes and sticky tape, clearly a world beater…some would say the position of the intakes would cause some compressor stall issues during medium to high AOA manouvering, but clearly the genius behind this design took that into account.
be lucky that they didn't make it goat shaped.
The manual control thing is easy to explain, it's to be able to use the aircraft even when computer equipment is at risk of being hacked
It would also be cheaper and les complex, yeah?
Absolutely. Just think what would happen to the US airfleet if our computers were hacked/infected or rendered inoperable via EMP.
You could still fly the F4's and some Tomcats (we probably have quite a few that could be made flight capable relatively quickly) I think. Any others in the US fleet that are candidates?
The cocpit they showed off is litterally instruments from a cessna.
Or simply "don't have any".
I agree 100% with it cant be hacked but it can be broke visa vie physical damage. All of this is moot as Iran is not capable of building a gen 5 or 6 stealth fighter plane. They harvested more info on aeronautics from this very comments section than they ever did reverse engineering f-5s, f-14s, and some recent drones they have been able to capture.
Everyone have seen the video it’s driving on runway but that’s basically how you start making a fighter, you first make a nice body and start testing it, for some reasone that first run video came out and was announced as ‘’completed Project’’ which didn’t make any sense. it will eventually be produced, in few more years.
(Compare this with Automatic stick shift and Manual)
1-Anti EMP...(That means when EMP strikes, you can control your plane)
2-Cheaper to make , electronics are more expansive to make.
This was also my guess. Electronic warfare could be an issue for a fly-by-wire system. If it's "old-school" it's immune to that sort of attack.
Exactly! EMP won't work on some of the planes making your tank , car , fully Electronic is kind of bad.. maybe a hybrid.. because EMP will take you out in a heart beat... hell even solar storm can devistate the society if unprepared.! @@Ryan_Winter
If youre jet well equepped to reflect solar storm you will withstand some of emp but that's expansive! and idk if you can actually install it on your plane
2:37 Not necessarily full manual flight, If autonomously managed while manually navigated command, in stealth mode, inertia sensors & memorized geo map, can offer a human pilot stealth free-fly. 7:33 a smaller intake wouldn't necessarily supress air, because it offers ramjet sonic flow advantage, unfortunately the speed potential of the engine purpulstion rate is not demonstrated.
it's literally a cardboard mockup, this thing doesn't and will never exist.
@@supermaster2012 lol, cardboard... It's "literally" CGI no dought. Nobody out of 🇮🇷 flight base has seen it. Was it a comp generated of a cardboard plan? *maybe*
@@rolflandale2565 may be soon they will be spotted in Ukraine
@@saeedfarmanali However, most nations wouldn't sell their military arms supply, unless it's already in the outdated model phase. So far, Iran is doing this in prototype rehearsal. Then again, *maybe* they have something much greater than this model.
This thing looks like it came out of a Kinder Surprise.
what are you talking about, no way would that fit into a Kinder Surprise, it is way too big
the only thing i wanna say is the air intake is small because the engine its based on doesnt need that much airflow anyway just like the f-5
maby the smallcockpit + _pilot_ is only for testing purposes.. ? I bet they will more or less also try to make fast moving drones, bigger ones as they have now some exp with em.
I'm very impressed with the stealth design of this plane. Because I don't see it leaving the ground.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
The stealth design prevents you from getting a speeding ticket when driving on the highway.
you saw it in the air, didn't you? typical westerner, you only see what u want to see, quite obviously
Because iran had not taken the flying shot
Open your eyes
It's a start is what it is. I don't think it will fly but it is something for Iran to gain experience with. They will learn from it and come up with ideas to work within their means. I live in Canada and wish my government would have the balls to start a fighter program and build up an aviation industry from there instead of relying on everyone else.
Wow, the only positive comment about Iran in this entire comment section
Props to you 👍
😂😂😂
the top air intake, would require inverted maneuver at most of the time in order to keep feeding the air hungry jet
Maybe this aircraft will prove one point that good engineering and not relying on electronic intervention may prove more reliable in the long-term.
Because I must ask this, how good a guided weapon. In inclement weather for rain, dust storms do they function as well
A mechanical aircraft will help against EMP style attacks.. or they simply do not have the tech to have a fully electronically controlled plan
Caution they have a new flying carpet
You realize that EMP defenses became standard in all military hardware during the 1950's - right?
Also computers and their cases are heavy. Small aircraft can get away with manual control.
if iran can control missiles then they can control a plane
My guess is that the 313 is body kit for the F5. Much like how Pontiac Fieros were turned into Ferraris.
I second this,
usa did similar with f117 and it was a (basically )succes
Then they painted it black so they could call it stealth. They may actually think black paint is all it takes!!
@James Iran made a lot of advancements in nanotechnology, so they might have developed an actual stealth coating
@@James-rn7dx so imma half stealth okay
The thing that you got to know is, the only thing that falls out of the air is crazy men, and bird shiza, I'd say that a redundant system and if you can control it, would not be a bad idea, besides that is seat of your pants flying, stick-and-rudder redundant systems are good.
It's good for support close combat range. I believe it the best in this class. This fighter only needs a 100-meter runway and can fly at low altitudes to evade radar detection. Go ahead. But for fighter in the category of F22, F35, Su 57, Su 35, Iran should build bigger turbofan and new bigger size of Qaher 313.
I'm no expert but here goes. FBW and other systems may be beyond their design capability and daily serviceability. What real good is a hangar queen when you need a sortie now. Using parts/engines/weapons that you trust and are available might make sense for a country that changes allies and enemies occasionally. The desire to have a new wave F5/MIG21 I can understand but can they pull it off? That remains to be seen.
The drooped wing tip can be used for “wave riding”, similar to what used on XB-70
Haha yea I doubt they are thinking about using their Mach shockwave to make travel more efficient lol. I would be surprised if that thing could even break the sound barrier.
@JZ's BFF yeah, XB-70 usually don’t drop the tip until passing supersonic. It don’t need be adjusted during wave riding like swing-wings. The reason for not droop the wingtip is for higher aspect ratio and improved low speed performance.
Yeah, this tiny jet with those massive intakes wouldn't break the sound barrier on a good day with a tailwind
@@theussmirage "with a tailwind "?
the hot glue couldn't keep the cardboard together so it bent in the direction of gravity,
maybe the no-fly by wire system is made to stand an EMP attack? i don't know if you can actually strike the computers of an aircraft with this type of tecnology, and i don't think that any contry in the world has the tecnology to do it now, but maybe they are already preventing from future tecnology?
i love the design and it is simple and functional
If you are trying to avoid a EMP blast and survive, then a non-computer controlled plane would work best to destroy your enemies military support structure.
Interesting idea.
However if the U.S Government Built a 210 million dollar F22 without taking Emp into consideration, then we have much much bigger problem to be concerned with.
Not saying you're wrong because it is possible, just expanding perspective.
The IAIO Qaher-313 looks so freaking Awesome
FREAKING!
And thats all
Looks ugly ngl
@@xenos7583 They probably stole some kid's 3D plane model from SketchUp
Every time I saw the segment of the jet taxiing, the voice in the back of my head yelled "RC model!"
That thing looks like it will compressor stall with any AoA with the intakes where they are
Their aircraft's lack of fly-by-wire computer control is not an advantage, no matter what they say. They haven't incorporated it into their jet because they don't have the expertise or (probably) the computer tech necessary to add it. Also, any claim of making the aircraft immune to EMP is ridiculous, because American combat vehicles reliant on computer control and netcentric warfare systems are hardened against EMP effect. If they're concerned about compromised operability due to EMP, it's only because, there too, their technology is lacking.
I can see how hardened the RQ-170 was against EW...they downed it in mint condition.
@@swedhgemoni8092 It's a drone. A pilot inside wouldn't be fooled by spoofing.
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD The systems would be. Especially given how reliant platforms like F-35 and upwards are on datalinks...a repeat of that would sever the connection with wingmen and leave the whole formation vulnerable (F-35 is a worthless aerodynamic turd by itself and I've zero confidence in it's survivability if forced into a standalone engagement).
I think fiber optic cables are more harder to EMP, just slap that on your fighter like the Koreans.
@@yestermonth Nah man, too expensive.
2:50 Id argue direct control is always best. Obviously as a last resort back up which is why those features are here in this. Its a bit much but in the modern day of electronic warfare they might have worries about having their fighter's control paths blocked possibly by some electro jamming device. Hey I'm using my brain here. Think about it tho. Thats how drones have been taken out in the past. They jam the flight control or flat out take it over from drones. Why not use the same tech to swat fighters out of the sky.
Im referring to drones being taken over. Not actual fighters but why not.
Because jet fighters are not piloted remotely.
Drones are hacked typically by spoofing GPS and telling the drone that it is landing in friendly territory. A pilot inside the aircraft that controls the aircraft will not land simply because the control logic tells him to.
the wi ng tips produce extra lift at supersonic speeds, the pressure defelcts pff pf the wings basically
main reasons why the Iranian jets Qaher 313 does not want to completely be relying on computer wire system is to stopping plane crashing due to emp or hacking and since their adversaries are technologically capable it's pretty smart move to in addition to wire systems have the ability to work in their absence due to computer hacking or emp.
Flying without a computer requires an aircraft planform that is inherently stable. Stable is good for passenger airliners but, not for fighters.
What Iran needs is Russian assistance to make the Qaher 313 become a reality and good enough to take to the Paris Airshow. Until people see it flying at the airshow and parked for inspection by VIPs, it doesn't count and doesn't matter. Iran was rightfully humiliated when they tried to pass off a R/C model as the real thing and a taxi test where the main gear had hidden electric motors to move it along.
Iran needs a real propaganda victory with the Qaher 313. I have no doubt that what Iran and Russia come up with will be bigger and the engines covered with something more robust than the plastic fuselage around the exhaust. But, it MUST look like the Qaher 313 that was roundly mocked and now shows itself in Paris as the equal of, say, the Saab Gripen.
@@BlackPill-pu4vi f35 took 35 years to finish the development and dozens of countries were involved in that project and you expect Iran to do it two years after showing the prototype
of curse they are fake just like their drone that US intelligence told us Iranian drone are epoxy mockup propaganda and footage of them in flight are photoshoped fake.
but since 2019 that they attacked Saudi oil infrastructure and patriot system couldn't stop them. and 1 patriot system destroyed by Iranian drone in UAE
same patriot that failed again and again against cheapest Iranian drone In Saudi and UAE and recently in Syria that resulted in 1 dead and 6 injured American.
ridiculous Ukraine claim is a pr propaganda ordered by US to change the embarrassing results of patriot missile but Iranian Khordad 3 which not even the best of Iranian air defense design (the best is Bavar 373) shot down the most expensive drone In the world (global hawk) with the first attempt in 32000 altitude that supposed to be out of reach of air defense missile the best Iranian air defense design and development is Bavar 373 which Russia's aviation expert admitted is superior to s300 but he also said it behind s400 but only in range .
so, from an objective and unbiases look at comparison of their weapons performance it would become obvious that USA was engaging in propaganda in exaggerating and overhyping their own weapons without any evidence to backed it up and engage in anti-Iranian propaganda to smear them by blatant lies that their drone epoxy.
the Lier and propagandist is the US not IRAN
you westerners have no idea about Iran except through western anti Iran propaganda.
but outside their propaganda they themselves admit to Iranian advancement. but not in media
ASPI which is Australian technology tracker put Iran among top ten technology superpower in all 44 critical strategic technology and in 7 of them in top 5 .
what about US
Persians without exception either winning or in top 3 in science Olympia.
Iran unveiled hypersonic missile.
Iran is among the countries that put satellite in orbit and only 8country can do that indigenously and none of them achieved it while under sanctions and embargo.
the first award winning female mathematician was Iranian result of Tehran sheriff university of technology.
Iran Ranks 5th in World Nanotechnology.
Iran rank 13th In AI development
according to global data institute and others Iran in top 5 manufacturers of gas turbine by capacity which is a critical strategic technology only handful of countries are poses after German Siemens stop the delivery of its gas turbine Iran mapna group sent 40 gas turbines with higher efficiency and lower price to Russia.
Russia is dependent on Iran for its aviation spare part for airliner.
Iran sending car, medicine, surgical robot, corona vaccine, gas turbine, drone, composite material and many more.
and i remind you again Iran is under Sevier sanction for 45 years
It needs stable manual control because the secret of the 313 is that it’s actually just a re-skinned F-5. They decided that since they have to build new planes anyways just make it look cool! They found a drawing one of the kids made and just decided to go with that…zoom zoooom!
Despite all its flaws must admit it's a pretty badass design 😎
The design look badass. But has never actually flown.
Fly by wire is not emp resistant. So a nuke won't take you out of the air also not susceptible to chip shortages
My thing is take the su57 for example, I believe that jet is a test bed platform.
This jet I believe is also just a test bed project, Iran is under harsh sanctions so the fact they could put something like this together is admirable.
Looks like the XFA-36 from Ace Combat 3!
From personal experience manual flying is actually slightly better than computerised flying this is because the flying is more down to pilot skill and not AI. But for faster response in a battle situation computerised flying could or could not be delayed when a pilot inputs a manoeuvre this is because the competent has to translate it then input the move but with manual it’s done instantly
That's literally not a thing, most modern fighters are impossible to fly without fly by wire.
Touch grass
latest news on this is from last year, military journalists in Iran announced that the project is still alive and is being used by research teams for various developments regarding fighter jets. i think qaher 313 received too much attention than we wanted, not to mention many other military projects and possible acquisition of Russian hardware were halted due to the economic crash and sanctions that followed in those years.
I'm not sure if the computer systems on a plane can be hacked or somehow controlled from the outside but if this is possible, then the decision to remove fly by wire might have been made to prevent control-hijacking of the plane from the outside
If that's the only system that's not digitally controlled, then when it's hacked the engines can still be turned off and the missiles can be jettisoned. Basically the same results except the attempt to glide it to the ground, which probably won't go so well going by the aerodynamics of the plane. lol
An aerodynamically stable design does make sense, if you are lacking the capacities to develop fly-by-wire software, the avionics suite etc.
In that case, anyone would try to close the gap, best possible, leaving headaches to the next generation, more time to catch up, included.
it's kinda hard to made avionics suites out of cardboard.
That is not, what I meant.
@@MonsieurPhilippe1 okay, here have a baguette and a white flag.
Capitulation accepted.
This jet looks like it was designed by sci fi artists who have no idea how planes actually work
Ghost of Iran is similar to what the Red Baron was about. Finding neat as well Tanks of Iran and Egypt. Their faith is fair game so far, much to admire.
The F16, F15, and F18 were all made in the 70s, don't ever underestimate determination!
I would worry a lot today!
The "I want to believe" of stealth fighters
That's also the Su-57
@@SeSmokki at least SU-57 can fly not like the crap in this video 😂
Love your work !!!, hopefully one day the Indian aircrafts get the stage too 😁!
India can actually build real planes not toys like these guys make
@@vinrico6704 yet can't build a functioning toilet.
@@supermaster2012 everyone has strengths and weakness...
I think the reason of the lack of computer system is because of cost reasons and/or an attempt to counter EMPs or other eletronic warfare weapons
although this was a test project, i really like this jet. i hope we see this one of them or a better one in future. as an iranian i don't think a 5th gen jet is possible rn.
Would be interesting to see a video on South Africa's Project CARVER (New Generation Fighter Aircraft) and the impact it had on the development of the Atlas Cheetah under Project TUNNY.
Just Googled it gaddamn.That woulda been amazing.
And mbb lamp Lampyridae
I would guess they use flussy by wiussy because they fear EMP or Hacking attacks.
Not sure if EMP is a real threat, but they definitely know how much getting hacked sucks after Stuxnet.
IMO, Emp is a threat. They expect to use it as a weapon of choice, and are building their future capabilities with that in mind. I say this because both the Soviets and the US published studies on it, and both came to the conclusion that if you wanted to wipe out the other, a few nukes at high altitude was all that is needed. The US Congress published a study decades ago that concluded 95% of the US population would die from such an attack.
Iran must be allergic to EMP and hack-proof hydraulic control surfaces
So advanced its a shape shifter, and some say it has inter dimesional capabilities, and a prayer mat!!
The shape of the wing does not mean that the jet is not fly by wire controlled, fly by wire can be used even without computer, the main goal of this technology is to reduce the strain and then computer was integrated. The shape of this wing will increase lift an reduce drag by decreasing the wing area and turbulence
I'm just an amateur at aviation stuff in general but I'm assuming that the advantage of not having a fly by wire system and having a manual system instead is safer cause there isn't a FBW computer and hence a lower chance of any failure/crashes due to problems with control surfaces
Could it be that the current version is just a new skin on an existing F-5 to make it a bit more lik F-14 but with some stealth? Yes, I know it's single tail vs twin tail, but it seems to make sense given what they have to work with, much like Taiwan's IDF looked like a weird mish-mash of F-5, F-16, and F/A-18 (with a dash of some Mirage jets in there) It's clear they don't have the avionics to make a true 5th gen stealth fighter, but can this this be even called 4.5gen? It's likely without radar as well, so it'd be CHEAP compared to a true 5th gen , much like F-5 vs F-14.
it's a coardboard mockup made from a 3D model they got from Fiver.
I see they finally got a hold of some captain scarlet tapes for design cues, lol
It needs to have a high wing (~F-18 hight), and centered cannard. I wouldn't call it canard config. tho, it's a three surface, without the third surface (or it being spiritually presumed, which is something usa has also did). The wing is not delta, but swept. The v-tail likely has 2 flaps on each (which can be configured in many ways). It has no stability because it needs constant correction. It achieves stealth mainly by having infrared radar like the F-117. 4 Missiles is quite enough imo. The intakes should make it fast, and they're hidden by being above the wing.
I even like the curving leading edge on the main wing. There's no way to make it better. Someone has thought really well about this.
Because of the fore plane the wingtips won't flex like on electric lightning. The almost same size to canard wing is interesting and needing a separate classification (because of giving a propriety), semi-tandem is what it is. The wings not being in line to canard is good because there's always spare wing thickness that you can give (which is why F-22 and F-15 were't so good, but Mirage 4000 was), and the main thing giving it drag is the unwise wing chord (something a new Sr-71 should consider).