Chandrasekhar LIMIT - Universe Sandbox 2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 вер 2024
  • Support this channel on Patreon:
    www.patreon.co...
    Hello and welcome to What Da Math!
    In this video, we will talk about Chandra limit and the person who is responsible for discovering it. This video will help you understand white dwarfs a little bit better and will inspire you to fight for what you believe in if you think you're right.
    Watch more to learn this concept.
    Don't forget, support this game:
    universesandbox...
    Enjoy and please subscribe.
    Other videos here: • Universe Sandbox 2
    Twitter: / whatdamath
    Facebook: / whatdamath
    Twitch: / whatdamath

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @sirrampagesalot9942
    @sirrampagesalot9942 6 років тому +24

    Proud of chandrashekhar
    🇮🇳.. Colonial British wanted to cover up he still continued.. Thanks for information.

    • @mejestic124
      @mejestic124 4 роки тому

      Shut up

    • @sirrampagesalot9942
      @sirrampagesalot9942 4 роки тому +3

      @@mejestic124 moron.. get a life! Who DF asked you respond 😂

    • @mejestic124
      @mejestic124 4 роки тому

      @@sirrampagesalot9942 please learn English and just shut your pie hole ! Thank you😊

    • @sirrampagesalot9942
      @sirrampagesalot9942 3 роки тому

      Ya keep learning English and feel proud.. colonial bootlicking ain't gonna get you nowhere.. I have news for you.. ERA OF COLONIALISM IS OVER.😎

    • @mejestic124
      @mejestic124 3 роки тому

      @@sirrampagesalot9942 no one wants to learn your stupid language 🤣 that's not my problem.

  • @naimulhaq9626
    @naimulhaq9626 8 років тому +16

    The British astrophysicists tried to cover up Chandrashekhar's finding? How un-British .

    • @debojitdas3018
      @debojitdas3018 6 років тому +3

      aurthur eddington was the astronomer who proved the einstein's theory , while every one was against einstein he stood by him and went against royal society ... the reason he refused to believe chandrashekhar was the lack
      of sufficent evidence for his theory ... and black hole was a completely new and hard to belive topic

    • @nikhilbisht4730
      @nikhilbisht4730 4 роки тому +4

      @@debojitdas3018 That's not the case bro
      The reason being he was an Indian

  • @mandamn2793
    @mandamn2793 5 років тому +3

    Chandrasekhar was an amazing scientist

  • @artvandelay6782
    @artvandelay6782 8 років тому +5

    Great video love your universe sandbox video's and the way you explain what is going on 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @amazingvisser3
    @amazingvisser3 8 років тому +4

    Chan and Einstein be HOMIES!

  • @robertschlesinger1342
    @robertschlesinger1342 Рік тому +1

    Excellent video. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video.

  • @yvonnemiezis8278
    @yvonnemiezis8278 5 років тому

    Thanks for this video, clarified things to me about the developments of stars a little bit at least ☺

  • @KurianTonyAloor
    @KurianTonyAloor 4 роки тому +2

    Chandrasekhar should be Honored better!

  • @thaq8.2
    @thaq8.2 2 роки тому

    Gotta start referring to this guy as Apollo

  • @radaro.9682
    @radaro.9682 4 роки тому

    The Atlanta perimeter (inside I-285) is a better visual for a neutron star (for me anyway) because it's mostly round and I don't have to adjust narrow reference.

  • @raceace
    @raceace 7 років тому +3

    What is the name of the software you were using? Looks awesome.

    • @mohammedsanaullah1065
      @mohammedsanaullah1065 7 років тому +2

      Rhys Hughes universe sandbox 2. its available on steam... really good product helped me solve and understand many astronomical occurrences

    • @michaelbeary
      @michaelbeary 7 років тому

      Yeah, that's what I'm wondering. It looks like some kind of program where you can build a solar system and see what happens or something. Pisses me off he didn't say in the description

  • @docholiday8029
    @docholiday8029 5 років тому

    The thing is we have never seen a white dwarf before it exploded as a supernova. So, everyone is guessing. Everyone.
    My money is on polar white dwarfs. They are highly magnetic because they are sealed in iron, except for their polar regions.
    With a normal white dwarf that is close enough to steal hydrogen from a companion star, the stolen gas sits on the surface until the density and pressure cause a run away fusion event we call a nova.
    In these cases the white dwarf is left intact. That is logical considering the fact that the shell of these solar cores is 200,000 times more dense/hard than granite. Virtually indestructible.
    Polar white dwarfs close enough to steal hydrogen from a companion, intake it at either pole. It is sucked into the INTERIOR of the white dwarf.
    Have you ever used a pressure cooker? What happens if you don't allow the steam to escape? Eventually, you have a pressure cooker bomb.
    Type 1a supernovae are galactic pressure cooker bombs. They always have the same luminosity because the pressure necessary to overcome the electromagnetic seal is always the same.
    Measured in Gauss it is 230,000,000. Google AN Ursae Majoris B. It has already exploded and the blast wave, including EMP, should arrive in the next decade.

  • @Axonteer
    @Axonteer 8 років тому +1

    Im glad i can support you via patreon for making such awesome cool videos!

  • @AbhishekPatel-ik7nv
    @AbhishekPatel-ik7nv 7 років тому +2

    the power of truth

  • @BlueEyesWhiteTeddy
    @BlueEyesWhiteTeddy 8 років тому

    I think i would have so much fun trying to create planetary systems around stellar systems, like binary and binary + 1 like alpha centauri is.

  • @cretium805
    @cretium805 8 років тому +2

    4:40 Does that explain magnetism?

    • @samuelbarreto6752
      @samuelbarreto6752 6 років тому +1

      No, this has to do with Pauli's Exclusion Principle and I think this also has to do with strong and weak nuclear forces, magnetism have nothing to do with it

  • @docholiday8029
    @docholiday8029 5 років тому +2

    What is the chandrasekhar limit?
    Eating too much at an Indian buffet?
    No, although I have done my share of that.
    Google says it is the maximize mass of a stable white dwarf star. It says above that matter will overcome electron degeneracy and collapse into a ball of neutrons, thus becoming a neutron star 🌟.
    Then they immediately contradict themselves and say overcoming electron degeneracy will cause an object to supernova. Make up your mind. You can't have it both ways.
    Actually, neither scenerio is true. A white dwarf has a shell that is 200,000 times more dense than solid rock i.e. degenerate matter.
    Degenerate matter: "matter consisting of atoms that have lost their orbital electrons." Because pressure fuses them to the protons making neutrons.
    White dwarfs are neutron stars with either hydrogen or helium surface layers.
    They don't put on a few extra tons and explode. Neither do they put on mass and collapse into a stellar remnant, like a pulsar or a black/white hole, although the latter would be more likely if it was actually overcoming electron degeneracy.
    No. They either accumulate stolen mass from a companion star on their surface and nova or they accumulate it into their interior (like polar wds) and when the pressure reaches 230 million Gauss, they explode, leaving NO REMNANT.
    Studies have proven that there are not nearly enough heavy white dwarfs to account for all the type 1a supernovae.
    Also, we have never seen a nova star switch and become a supernova. Because it can't. It lacks the internal structure needed to suck gas inside itself.
    Finally, white dwarfs are burnt out stars. They are really dim. We can only see about 30,000 of them. None of those has exploded as a supernova. Science has no clue which ones explode or why. Fact.
    The chandrasekhar limit isn't a blasting cap. It is merely the minimum mass requirement of a pulsar. That's it.

    • @matejmanevski6749
      @matejmanevski6749 5 років тому +2

      I also read the same thing on Google. And yes you cant have bouth things at once both a supernova and collapsing. I read that only carbon-oxygen based white dwarfs can detonate or explode from the requaint temp. and pressure. It is a violent process that fuses the carbon and oxygen atoms together relising more energy and we have a type 1a Supernova. I want to say it dippends on the structure of the white dwarf. If it is made from Helium it will colapse into a neutron star if its carbon based it will detonate. Type this on Wiki.
      Carbon detonation
      White Dwarf

    • @docholiday8029
      @docholiday8029 5 років тому +2

      @@matejmanevski6749
      First, cool name. I am guessing Slavic in origin.
      Second, sounds like you are paying attention. Good.
      The thing is we have never seen a white dwarf before it exploded as a supernova. So, everyone is guessing. Everyone.
      My money is on polar white dwarfs. They are highly magnetic because they are sealed in iron, except for their polar regions.
      With a normal white dwarf that is close enough to steal hydrogen from a companion star, the stolen gas sits on the surface until the density and pressure cause a run away fusion event we call a nova.
      In these cases the white dwarf is left intact. That is logical considering the fact that the shell of these solar cores is 200,000 times more dense/hard than granite. Virtually indestructible.
      Polar white dwarfs close enough to steal hydrogen from a companion, intake it at either pole. It is sucked into the INTERIOR of the white dwarf.
      Have you ever used a pressure cooker? What happens if you don't allow the steam to escape? Eventually, you have a pressure cooker bomb.
      Type 1a supernovae are galactic pressure cooker bombs. They always have the same luminosity because the pressure necessary to overcome the electromagnetic seal is always the same.
      Measured in Gauss it is 230,000,000. Google AN Ursae Majoris B. It has already exploded and the blast wave, including EMP, should arrive in the next decade.

  • @vivamariamemeMJ
    @vivamariamemeMJ 6 років тому

    thank you for the video. this was very helpful

  • @lololee2580
    @lololee2580 5 років тому

    i do believe in resarch work but the practice of human body when we relate to mechanism of sun planet and how it reloves and how function
    when we keep relateing to human body life cycle the stages of active and slow active the functions of body highly dimishes in all ends
    take a look how intial body organs and how later state each part of the function of tube to anything how much it shows difference
    that is almost shown
    black spot often ends up to move the circulation there it spreads all ends when the active part of work is missing and then turns almost dead black
    that creates each places
    so human body to related with life cycle of envrionment is so much important but how to apply how it going to use and benefit people
    how to be prepare this all looked up in

  • @eliasvandenmooter35
    @eliasvandenmooter35 7 років тому +3

    isn't Betelgeuse a supergiant?

    • @Versuffe
      @Versuffe 5 років тому

      It’s a red giant to me XD
      maybe super giant
      UY SCUTI IS A MASSIVESUPERGIANT

    • @aquariumfish-i4h
      @aquariumfish-i4h 3 роки тому

      @@Versuffe hypergiant

  • @gustavderkits8433
    @gustavderkits8433 Місяць тому

    Unfortunate repetition of comparison of Chandrasekhar with Einstein that sets up a controversy that should not exist.

  • @casskerman2952
    @casskerman2952 8 років тому +1

    red neutron star :-)

  • @diogenesPL
    @diogenesPL 8 років тому +2

    Did you study astronomy or something?

  • @choitisingh5198
    @choitisingh5198 7 років тому

    Its just amazing

  • @pranavr4464
    @pranavr4464 6 років тому +1

    Which software or app did u use
    bro

  • @shifttide484
    @shifttide484 4 роки тому

    can you please tell me the software/application you used here?please?

  • @kobracommander9676
    @kobracommander9676 8 років тому +2

    anton, what exactly is a wolf-rayet star?

    • @vijayasahu5413
      @vijayasahu5413 8 років тому

      Wolf rayet stars go hyper nova and create nebuals i think

    • @LUD1666
      @LUD1666 8 років тому +1

      Hope he makes a video about it.

    • @kobracommander9676
      @kobracommander9676 8 років тому +1

      he did, like 2 months back, right after i asked him hehe

    • @daviipowell7994
      @daviipowell7994 8 років тому

      Every star above the limit discussed creates nebulae. Both supergaints and hypergaints.

    • @pipertripp
      @pipertripp 8 років тому +1

      Wolf-Rayet stars are massive stars that have evolved off the main sequence and are fusing helium in their cores. They undergo severe mass loss due to very strong solar winds and have blown off their hydrogen envelop. They go bye bye as Type 1b/c supernovae (which makes sense b/c Type I supernovae are characterized by weak/non-existent hydrogen lines in their spectra). Hope that was at least kinda helpful.

  • @маци-э2ъ
    @маци-э2ъ 8 років тому +15

    can you share your opinion about the flat earth hypothesis?!

    • @hcn6708
      @hcn6708 8 років тому +4

      YES!

    • @jakubk.8836
      @jakubk.8836 8 років тому +5

      +McMario Y0 YAAASSS

    • @RhobarElite
      @RhobarElite 8 років тому +5

      +McMario Y0 That therory even doesnt deserve atention. Everybody with IQ 80+ can understood why its so stupid and find proves againist it on the internet.

    • @маци-э2ъ
      @маци-э2ъ 8 років тому

      evidence?

    • @маци-э2ъ
      @маци-э2ъ 8 років тому

      PHOTOS?! does this seem real to you?!?! www.google.com/search?q=photos+of+earth&pws=0&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjRk7X7rdrNAhUFPRQKHa0DAZkQ_AUICCgB&biw=1920&bih=979

  • @TheChidoryvsRasengan
    @TheChidoryvsRasengan 8 років тому +1

    I LOVE YOU

  • @shawnmmiller984
    @shawnmmiller984 8 років тому

    Where would pulsars fall in this mix?

    • @ВіталійЛуцан
      @ВіталійЛуцан 8 років тому +2

      +Shawn MMiller inside, obviously. they are created after a supernova (for they are core of the dying star, consisting mainly of neutrons for gravity overcoming weak nuclear force, despite usually being weaker in at least a hundred thousand times). this happens only because during it`s death, such a star rapidly implodes (like, gets crushed into a small dense ball by it`s own mass (more precisely, gravity)). during this stage, core is under such high pressure that electrons and protons literally merge into neutrons. this creates incredible amount of energy that gets released in explosion that tears that star apart, throwing all the star material out in space. but, the neutron matter of core remains where the star used to be. as time goes by, the star spins faster and faster, emitting a lot of elctromagnetic signals. pulsation of those impulses gave name to these objects emitting them, wich we now call pulsars. pulsars themselves don`t explode. they are bright and may even seem like a star (though much smaller), they just cool down and fade out. i hope this answers your question ^^

    • @shawnmmiller984
      @shawnmmiller984 8 років тому

      +Віталій Луцан that was actually really helpful, thanks!

    • @ВіталійЛуцан
      @ВіталійЛуцан 8 років тому

      Shawn MMiller yay ^^

  • @inskilledphoenix-1310
    @inskilledphoenix-1310 8 років тому +1

    174th

  • @SuperPorcaccio
    @SuperPorcaccio 8 років тому +1

    🇧

  • @randallpage277
    @randallpage277 8 років тому

    hi

  • @jagannathans2292
    @jagannathans2292 7 років тому

    Superb

  • @vijayasahu5413
    @vijayasahu5413 8 років тому

    Anton whats the difference between 'Universe' and 'Cosmos'

    • @modernmaster55
      @modernmaster55 8 років тому

      There is none.

    • @ВіталійЛуцан
      @ВіталійЛуцан 8 років тому

      +ZincNut
      nope. Cosmos is russin word for space. space is basically all and every single part of the universe, a part of it, though can also be used to describe universe (though it is wrong, in fact)

    • @XarynMar
      @XarynMar 8 років тому

      Cosmos is originally an ancient greek word meaning everything (and the order of everything, as opposed to chaos).

  • @happylittlemonk
    @happylittlemonk 3 роки тому

    I studied Astronomy and Computer Science. I discovered a solution that can easily explain and prove at least 20 mysteries in physics, such as Dart Mater, Dark Energy, Quantum Entanglement, Solution to Fusion, ... I wrote to many professors, went to the university I studied it, and tried to speak about it to over 1000 people, NOT ONE person to this day after 10 years has given me 1 hour to even hear me out. So your advice is totally useless. To all you wanabe scientist, please do not study science, go into finance, become a lawyer, loan shark, or a drug dealer. Do not let society abuse you and steal your life- time's hard work and laugh in your face. All the celeb scientists you see have sold their soul and become a showmen. Science has no value unless you are willing to bend over and be screwed. Just like those idiots who send their son's to war and get killed or maimed and are proud of a $1 medal they get followed by endless BS propaganda rituals.

  • @abhaypathak5347
    @abhaypathak5347 3 роки тому

    Indian were not given proper recognisations by the whites.

  • @massjur
    @massjur 8 років тому

    Simulates supernova star Hamal to 66 light years from the solar system.

  • @xlilxillx
    @xlilxillx 2 роки тому

    non-sense