Fighting against the Qd8 Scandinavian

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @enricopallazzo3244
    @enricopallazzo3244 5 років тому +16

    Most intetesting start I've seen in some time! Thanks for sharing. You're quickly becoming one of my favorite chess content creators.

    • @eric-rosen
      @eric-rosen  5 років тому +3

      😍 🙏

    • @jagadishbabur.a7794
      @jagadishbabur.a7794 3 роки тому

      @@eric-rosen is this joining hand emoji in America also ??? Usually this custom of joining hand is in India and neighboring countries.

  • @rocchirodrigo
    @rocchirodrigo 5 років тому +29

    OMG I was completely confused in the last minutes searching for your videos while typing Eric Hansen, I'm such a idiot, and asking myself why he is so different, it isn't him HAHAHA

  • @omarceentayyab
    @omarceentayyab 3 роки тому

    Did he just say Patrick JMT?!?! That is the most interesting opponent u've played ever. I love that guy!

  • @TheDannytaz
    @TheDannytaz 3 роки тому +1

    15:55 clutch pre-move cancel

  • @WalterHassell
    @WalterHassell 5 років тому +2

    26:00 "but Chrome ironically took up too much CPU usage" LOL

  • @s15cbow
    @s15cbow 5 років тому +2

    This is a pretty fun position - it looks a lot like the Ryder Gambit. It's dubious, but you can probably find the ideas you need to play in this by studying that a little bit.

  • @hanvroman
    @hanvroman 5 років тому +1

    This is how the rosen anti Qd8 skandi was born and created...

  • @yosefcohen483
    @yosefcohen483 2 роки тому +1

    kinda suspicious - he's thinking after you took his knight... 15:40 (he has one move - to capture back) it's almost as if he was using a... but...no, that's impossible! (You forgot about Kd6, but this 1900+ player did not! what a champion!)
    This user still exist... 2022 July 12.

  • @njegostrivanovic6665
    @njegostrivanovic6665 5 років тому +1

    1:25 Bc4 Better move. Pripering little tarp and developing piece

  • @cristoperb
    @cristoperb 5 років тому +1

    Have you and John Bartholomew ever done a dual commentary type match? You should!

  • @stranger2223
    @stranger2223 4 роки тому

    16:29 imagine you have a bluetooth mouse and the battery runs out and opponent just moved with a pawn xD

  • @KevinWood44
    @KevinWood44 5 років тому +5

    Eric Im a fan Ive learned a lot from u, that said Id loveeeee to see u play John Bartolemew in a Qd8 Scandi.....challenge him, that would make for great tv......or online?!?

    • @iwnl_vale
      @iwnl_vale 5 років тому

      Great youtube I guess

    • @KevinWood44
      @KevinWood44 5 років тому

      @@iwnl_vale touché

    • @eliastta437
      @eliastta437 4 роки тому

      John and Eric are the two best chesstubers!

  • @tamiyowo
    @tamiyowo 5 років тому +4

    Can you do some variations on the Bird opening? I can’t seem to get a hang of it.

    • @henkdetank7306
      @henkdetank7306 5 років тому

      It isnt really a good opening thats maybe why try play english if you want to play an alternative from d4 and e4

    • @kevinjohnson6549
      @kevinjohnson6549 5 років тому

      henk de tank it’s perfectly fine if you play at lower ratings. Just memorize lines and play the opening every time you get white and your knowledge in the opening will make up for it being a not very good opening.

    • @raphaelhudson
      @raphaelhudson 5 років тому +1

      It is fine for all ratings. nothing wrong with it, Carlsen recently defeated even Kramnik with it in a serious game.

  • @anguishingquark
    @anguishingquark 5 років тому +6

    Should’ve played Nb5 one move earlier

  • @mr_kubiak2896
    @mr_kubiak2896 5 років тому +2

    Queen takes on d4 is too dangerous for black. Simple development with e6 and when
    White long castles then Bb4 is better.

  • @ALLINMACHINE
    @ALLINMACHINE 5 років тому

    Eric, have you seen the video about 4D chess from Allen pan? It's so insane XD any thoughts about it?

  • @vikramsrinivasan8176
    @vikramsrinivasan8176 5 років тому +1

    I would have won the 1st match Eric because there was the option of giving check with queen instead of bishop. Also I can target your rook as black and play for advantage 😀💪👌👍

  • @chrishardy6471
    @chrishardy6471 5 років тому

    curious why not Qg5 in place of taking the bishop? would that not have won your bishop for black?

  • @AlvaroVera93
    @AlvaroVera93 5 років тому +1

    27:57 Eric, why is h3 a key move, what happens if the bishop just retreats to h5, how do you punish that?

    • @mrengler1
      @mrengler1 5 років тому +5

      6. h3 Bh5 7. g4 Bg6 8. Ne5 is very annoying for black. white is threatening h4-h5. if black plays h6 to give the bishop a cubby hole, then Nxg6 fxg6 is terrible kingside pawns.

    • @itachiuchiha5771
      @itachiuchiha5771 3 роки тому

      @@mrengler1 would you just long castle after that? Seems like your kingside would be unsafe for your king

  • @steventorres8784
    @steventorres8784 4 роки тому

    The only way I fall asleep tbhh

  • @gustavjanson4460
    @gustavjanson4460 5 років тому

    At move 9 you could have castled, then knight b5, bishop b5 check also attacking the queen with your rock... But there is probably a big chance that he would have seen that

  • @counterstrike1110
    @counterstrike1110 5 років тому

    you should verse john in a blitz match

  • @architnarang3232
    @architnarang3232 5 років тому +1

    Rosen for GM

  • @strings1984
    @strings1984 5 років тому

    @ 15:30 why not night D5?

  • @malegupta8404
    @malegupta8404 5 років тому

    waht aobut bb5 instead of bd3

  • @Mario-lr1xk
    @Mario-lr1xk 5 років тому +6

    Knight b5 was winning for black...

    • @psymon3823
      @psymon3823 5 років тому +2

      Yeah when he played it, after black played e6 its a -3 evaluation. But on the previous move when he was originally going to play it (immediately after Qxd4) it was winning

    • @synchronium24
      @synchronium24 5 років тому +1

      @@psymon3823"But on the previous move when he was originally going to play it (immediately after Qxd4) it was winning"
      If it is, you're going to have to demonstrate the winning line. Stockfish only gives a +0.6-0.8 evaluation at depth 30 and higher after 8...Qxd4 9. Nb5, with 9... cxb5 being it's recommended move for black. Still enough for the advantage that Eric claimed white can get with the pawn sac.

    • @psymon3823
      @psymon3823 5 років тому +1

      @@synchronium24 right so the stockfish line after cxb5 is
      10. Bxb5+ Nbd7
      11. Qxb7. Rd8
      12. Bc7 Qd4+
      13 Qxd4 Nxd4
      14 o-o-o. A6 - (note if black plays the obvious Nxf7, then white will still be able to equalize by rexapturing the knight, taking on d8 and taking twice on d7)
      15. Bc6 Nc5
      16. Bxd8 Kxd8
      17. Rxd7+ Nxd7
      18. Rd1. Material is now even, and white gets back his piece with far a superior development. In fact all all pieces black developed have vanished and whites two remaining pieces have infiltrated.

    • @synchronium24
      @synchronium24 5 років тому

      @@psymon3823 Thanks.
      " Material is now even, and white gets back his piece with far a superior development. In fact all all pieces black developed have vanished and whites two remaining pieces have infiltrated."
      While this is all true, the engine still does not seem convinced it's winning. Black is able to free his pieces from the back rank without further loss of material (beyond white winning back the d7 knight), trade rooks, and go into an opposite colored bishop endgame (tend to be drawish) a pawn down. It's plausible that it's winning, but far from clear.

    • @psymon3823
      @psymon3823 5 років тому

      @@synchronium24 just looked further and youre right, although white is up a connected passed pawn, with proper defense black can stop white from making progress. Pretty drawish, but if anyone can win the endgame its white.

  • @dmed312
    @dmed312 5 років тому

    13:01 What's wrong with Qc8?

    • @kingmop7249
      @kingmop7249 5 років тому

      Bd6xBb4 losses the bishop

    • @jacobeisberg3731
      @jacobeisberg3731 5 років тому +2

      What about Qg5+?

    • @mrtwister9002
      @mrtwister9002 5 років тому

      @@jacobeisberg3731
      Yeah, I saw this. Possibly perpetual I think.

  • @malegupta8404
    @malegupta8404 5 років тому

    i think that mr rosen had misplaeyd the game somehow thxx for teh cute game thxx

  • @doit997
    @doit997 5 років тому +3

    2 pieces and a rook are better han a queen

    • @NoneShallBeSpared_
      @NoneShallBeSpared_ 5 років тому +1

      Depends on the position of the king you have,an open king is easy to target by the queen

  • @milankotevski1663
    @milankotevski1663 5 років тому +1

    10.Nb5 was an outright blunder which gives Black decisive advantage. You gotta work on those calculation skills Eric.

    • @deadlysilent7120
      @deadlysilent7120 5 років тому

      Yes and no

    • @navalarya
      @navalarya 5 років тому

      says who?

    • @builderjunkie0126
      @builderjunkie0126 5 років тому

      texan2013 the engine

    • @synchronium24
      @synchronium24 5 років тому +4

      Ya, he was going to much off of memory. 9. Nb5 (one move earlier) would've given white an advantage, but one move makes all the difference.

  • @vikramsrinivasan8176
    @vikramsrinivasan8176 5 років тому

    This black guy is playing as if I started learning Chess. Don't think this match had a quality defence Eric.

    • @vikramsrinivasan8176
      @vikramsrinivasan8176 5 років тому

      Instead of pawn c6 knight c6 would have been better. It develops pieces and takes care of open D file. Eric you are my Chess Guru 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

    • @lessmore8258
      @lessmore8258 5 років тому +1

      Lool Kc6 drops the knight to Bb5 (c6 is the best move)