Have heard this guys system and believe me you have no idea how good and deep the rabbit hole goes. I am not a newbie by any means in this game and he is next level
Totally agree, there is no “Absolute Sound” that all the audiophile tends to reach. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. 😉 P.S. I like your approach! ❤
What was the name of your breakthrough amplifier? I am not hearing you well. Is it Hamal 2? Amal 2? ML 2? Transcripts see it as ml 2. Could you please spell it out? Just wondering. And was this a prototype amp where there was no mass production, or are there examples of it around. As much as I am a fan of audio equipment, the cost does not justify the purchase to my ears since they are not what they were 30 year ago. My passion is discovering new works I have never heard from new composers to me. I am fairly flexible on what system I am listening to them on.
You bring up an important point about discovering something about the way a system “informs” you as to what engages and involves you in the sound. You have to be open to this and it isn’t a cerebral analysis of sound which is the way most audiophiles are oriented. I only differ with you in terms of your often mysterious and extremely complex methods of attaining a compelling system (elaborate horns, SET etc). In my experience, this involvement can often come from very simple systems, often with very obvious errors of sound reproduction (usually omission).
Have heard this guys system and believe me you have no idea how good and deep the rabbit hole goes. I am not a newbie by any means in this game and he is next level
Romy the Cat Audio, you have been around for some time, and now here, welcome.
Totally agree, there is no “Absolute Sound” that all the audiophile tends to reach.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. 😉
P.S. I like your approach! ❤
Love this guy. He needs to be the subject of a documentary. Of course I think he is completely full of it but he's still amusing.
Well your website is broken on your homepage - As well in the link provided here - ??
Time to give up the smokes I think "
What was the name of your breakthrough amplifier? I am not hearing you well. Is it Hamal 2? Amal 2? ML 2? Transcripts see it as ml 2. Could you please spell it out? Just wondering. And was this a prototype amp where there was no mass production, or are there examples of it around. As much as I am a fan of audio equipment, the cost does not justify the purchase to my ears since they are not what they were 30 year ago. My passion is discovering new works I have never heard from new composers to me. I am fairly flexible on what system I am listening to them on.
Great insights. Sadly today high end audio is too much about egos and insane price tags.
You bring up an important point about discovering something about the way a system “informs” you as to what engages and involves you in the sound. You have to be open to this and it isn’t a cerebral analysis of sound which is the way most audiophiles are oriented.
I only differ with you in terms of your often mysterious and extremely complex methods of attaining a compelling system (elaborate horns, SET etc). In my experience, this involvement can often come from very simple systems, often with very obvious errors of sound reproduction (usually omission).
Hard to see you through your haze of cigar smoke Romy! Hopefully all your high end expensive audio equipment doesn’t smell like a old dirty cigar
Is this the money laundring Audio Mafia :)
Sorry I fell asleep.
Romy what do you say? Keep a DAC running 24/7 or switch it on and off?
😅