How to Multiply in Seconds!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 кві 2023

КОМЕНТАРІ • 97

  • @KingdomMusicCitizens
    @KingdomMusicCitizens Рік тому +10

    It looks like it works with only multiplication with factors of 9 or 9s.

  • @johnnybekkestad2185
    @johnnybekkestad2185 Рік тому +22

    Does this only work in specific scenarios? Most of the random equations I tried with will not give correct result.

  • @rahulkhanolkar357
    @rahulkhanolkar357 Рік тому +1

    Yes it never worked with my equation. I tried many sums with this method with 890 x 90 but it didn't work.

  • @tayfunaldanmaz8983
    @tayfunaldanmaz8983 Рік тому +2

    thank a lot for the videos i don care abou what the others say im thankful with what i learn

  • @thefaithakintunde
    @thefaithakintunde Рік тому +18

    This is not a principle. It’s limited. Students should be careful!

  • @josephi.atagbuzia6465
    @josephi.atagbuzia6465 Рік тому +2

    This looks good but is quite limited. For instance try 91x91, 721x8009, 645x9898.
    It means it is not a thorough method.

  • @TheEquilibriumEffects
    @TheEquilibriumEffects 10 місяців тому +1

    I wish this would work for every multiplication. 😂😂

    • @sab7804
      @sab7804 7 місяців тому

      Same. At first I didn't realize there was ×9 everywhere so I was so sad when I tried it with random numbers and it didn't work

  • @israeloluwasegun596
    @israeloluwasegun596 Рік тому +3

    It has limits bro. Very big limits🤐

  • @joyaacio2263
    @joyaacio2263 Рік тому +5

    When do we apply this trick, because it doesn't work with every number?

    • @Sd4666
      @Sd4666 Рік тому

      If 9X6 this technique does not work

    • @TrollsRUs
      @TrollsRUs Рік тому

      ​@@Sd4666it works if you reverse the order to 6*9. I wouldn't rely on this method.

  • @A.T59
    @A.T59 Місяць тому

    Thx for teaching :>

  • @amudhasivaram811
    @amudhasivaram811 6 місяців тому

    I like your video

  • @laliabhogate8653
    @laliabhogate8653 11 місяців тому +1

    Solve this with your method - 100×100 = ?

  • @garlicvine71
    @garlicvine71 4 місяці тому

    48-1=47;99-47=52=4752

  • @aksingh4281
    @aksingh4281 Рік тому +2

    8x9 will not be equal to 9x8.
    😂😅😂😊

  • @nihaqusyuhamus3471
    @nihaqusyuhamus3471 7 місяців тому

    37 x 97, if u using this formula, then you will get 3661 instead of 3589.
    75 x 85, you will get 7411 instead of 6375. 😅😅

  • @36ayushthakare58
    @36ayushthakare58 Рік тому +1

    It doesn't work on every problem

  • @taravijay87
    @taravijay87 Рік тому

    it will work only if the 2nd number is greater than the 1st number

  • @rajeshchandra2054
    @rajeshchandra2054 Рік тому

    Please solve 134x134,it does not wark

  • @stephenaunda6676
    @stephenaunda6676 Рік тому

    Not applicable to all sums and by using it it will mislead the learners. eg 4*8 is 35

  • @shanmugam5892
    @shanmugam5892 Рік тому

    It only works when the second set of multiplication is following 9 series. Else won't work out

  • @ishtalks6505
    @ishtalks6505 11 місяців тому

    48x99=4752

  • @abdulkareemabdussalam8201
    @abdulkareemabdussalam8201 Рік тому +2

    How can I solve 10 x 10 using the same method?

  • @sonovivo1247
    @sonovivo1247 7 місяців тому

    Is there a GOOD soul who can explain me why he subtract 1 from each first number and why he can't do it for the last? And, optionally, what trick is it because with the title "SECONDS" it doesn't make sense to me. So what trick is he using?

  • @shreelakshmishreelakshmi7785
    @shreelakshmishreelakshmi7785 9 місяців тому

    22×54 please slove this in this method

  • @kanajivaja1456
    @kanajivaja1456 Рік тому +1

    This trik is not usefull 82×81

  • @samrachanapich6370
    @samrachanapich6370 Рік тому

    48 x 99 = 4752
    If u doing like this 99 x 48 using that method won’t work only if u put 48 x 99 it will work using that method 😁

  • @sonalgoyal1044
    @sonalgoyal1044 Рік тому +1

    9×7 solve using this trick

    • @TrollsRUs
      @TrollsRUs Рік тому

      You would have to change it to 7*9. Not a reliable method.

  • @Cook_with__logic
    @Cook_with__logic Місяць тому

    Can we do 7×4?

  • @oluwatunbiemmanuel8236
    @oluwatunbiemmanuel8236 10 місяців тому

    Prof. I tried this multplication with your method it does not work e. g. 231 × 240 by your method I got 23,0010 but calculator gave me 55, 440 also 2354 x 3469 by method we got 23,531,116. Calculator gave us 8,166,026 Please help us out as we are interested in your method sir.

  • @Akiraofficial-fg5jh
    @Akiraofficial-fg5jh 7 місяців тому

    23×9

  • @fohbarbell744
    @fohbarbell744 Рік тому

    Unless I'm missing something, this method only works some of the time. Using this method, 6x9= 54 but 9x6 doesn't equal 54, nor does 10x10 or any number of other combinations. It either works all the time or not at all. This method doesn't work. Whoever posted this video should have known it doesn't work.

  • @user-yj4ls6mg4q
    @user-yj4ls6mg4q Рік тому

    Using an Excel spreadsheet to do the calculations, I just tried this out on several random numbers ---- clearly does not always work. In fact, did not work for any of my examples.

  • @nathanphillbertliauw8922
    @nathanphillbertliauw8922 Рік тому

    This applies to multiplicand that only consist of number 9.

  • @preyalthaker8106
    @preyalthaker8106 10 місяців тому

    Sir why i am not getting correct answer for 325x365

  • @ijitolachristiana7618
    @ijitolachristiana7618 Рік тому +1

    This is limited, this isn't good for all figures

  • @bhavanikm7062
    @bhavanikm7062 Рік тому

    Don't spoil generation by giving wrong tricks
    If it is
    8×9 working
    Why it is not working with 9×8??
    What's the results for
    10×10??
    I reported it as misleading

  • @imuwahenaigbedion6289
    @imuwahenaigbedion6289 Рік тому +3

    Is this working just for the nine times

  • @johndarnton9913
    @johndarnton9913 Рік тому +1

    ถ้าจำนวนหลัง น้อยกว่าจำนวนหน้า ?

  • @abrontoure9376
    @abrontoure9376 Рік тому

    Doesn’t work for all cases, for example try 12 x 3,500 !!

  • @priyankajain3713
    @priyankajain3713 10 місяців тому

    111×961 ,this is also coming incorrect with your method

  • @tomjo9246
    @tomjo9246 Рік тому

    In many cases the method goes wrong. Don't believe everything.

  • @thomasjaynarvios6445
    @thomasjaynarvios6445 6 місяців тому

    Bruhh only on the 9 times bruhhhhh

  • @meredithgreen2838
    @meredithgreen2838 Рік тому

    Does this only work with 9s

  • @MenonRaghuraj
    @MenonRaghuraj Рік тому

    It wont work in most of the cases.

  • @senyotsedze3388
    @senyotsedze3388 10 місяців тому

    How are you even getting the 1s

  • @yohanatiro1506
    @yohanatiro1506 Рік тому

    9x8=72

  • @Blackandyellow68
    @Blackandyellow68 Рік тому

    To prof d. Try 18 x 19

  • @36ayushthakare58
    @36ayushthakare58 Рік тому

    Like 992×998 it is 991007 by this method but actually it is 990016

  • @degracy2588
    @degracy2588 Рік тому

    it work if the number multiply with 99 or 999 only
    Do you have others trick?

  • @CindyElcano
    @CindyElcano Рік тому

    8*8 🧐

  • @fiscalfreedom-pc8tk
    @fiscalfreedom-pc8tk Рік тому

    How to get the answer 7*7=? with this formula

  • @isakawaii2485
    @isakawaii2485 5 місяців тому

    Eso no se enseña en la escuela 😮😮😮😮

  • @jyothiraju8656
    @jyothiraju8656 Рік тому

    How about you just multiply by either 10 or 100 and just subtract by the original number? Absolute bogus of a trick this is.

  • @silviad.5997
    @silviad.5997 7 місяців тому

    Y que pedo? Como sabemos de dónde tomó la decisión de quitar el uno del seis y el cinco del nueve? ESTO NO SIRVE

  • @nihaqusyuhamus3471
    @nihaqusyuhamus3471 7 місяців тому

    7626 x 99? 😅

  • @bankimshah5440
    @bankimshah5440 Рік тому

    Not working in all specific
    Eg. 392 * 765

  • @drshalinivenkatesh9871
    @drshalinivenkatesh9871 Рік тому

    Why does this trick doesn’t work on any number?

  • @nirmalaprasad9343
    @nirmalaprasad9343 Рік тому

    17× 9

  • @aditivaidya3507
    @aditivaidya3507 Рік тому

    Can we solve 3×7=

  • @wawanyuliawan9021
    @wawanyuliawan9021 Рік тому

    If 15 x 15.....

  • @ushapokhrel1775
    @ushapokhrel1775 10 місяців тому

    4752

  • @miracleagbaka4626
    @miracleagbaka4626 Рік тому

    5×10

  • @aradhanaupadhyay571
    @aradhanaupadhyay571 Рік тому

    It worked
    Answer-4752

    • @jyothiraju8656
      @jyothiraju8656 Рік тому

      Try multiplying 48 by 100, and subtracting 48 from the product....

  • @christianbalaquit-ng6nk
    @christianbalaquit-ng6nk 8 місяців тому

    4762

  • @miracleagbaka4626
    @miracleagbaka4626 Рік тому

  • @mmtn9043
    @mmtn9043 Рік тому

    8x7 this technique does not apply, are there specific numbers

  • @islamicmesssge3754
    @islamicmesssge3754 Рік тому

    Hai

  • @Nikisha.14
    @Nikisha.14 4 місяці тому

    Mmmmmm😊

  • @zap_pixel9447
    @zap_pixel9447 Рік тому

    This is wrong.

  • @islamicmesssge3754
    @islamicmesssge3754 Рік тому

    Fake

  • @user-yr7bg8qx5y
    @user-yr7bg8qx5y Рік тому

    Please,stop sending out this info or kindly bring this video down , you are actually killing the brains of those who like mathematics or non mathematicians individual s/students. This is totally rubbish

  • @constancecmac
    @constancecmac Рік тому

    AGREED @johnnybekkestad
    Every one I tried, Failed!

  • @bungakekwa9598
    @bungakekwa9598 11 місяців тому

    4752

  • @user-yr7bg8qx5y
    @user-yr7bg8qx5y Рік тому

    Please,stop sending out this info or kindly bring this video down , you are actually killing the brains of those who like mathematics or non mathematicians individual s/students. This is totally rubbish

  • @berhanufufa3974
    @berhanufufa3974 Рік тому

    4752