Kevin - I've always heard there are three main/basic components to an argument: The Premise (idea), The Warrant(s) (support) & The Claim(s) (conclusion) - You seem to be combining the Premise & Warrants - It clearly works and your explanation seems more succinct, but can you share some thoughts about my comment just the same? Thanks Kevin
you are awsome!!! this is actually not boring because you make me think deeper so i dont get bored, thank you so much ,you are my life saver for today because i think i am going to pass my test
Of all the possible examples you could have used, this s the one you start with. Yes, well done. I was looking for exercises to use with my students. Nonetheless, . . . . .
The difference is between arguments and argumentation. In this video, he is just showing the basic components for an argument. In later videos he talks about what makes good arguments, which will include the warrant.
Why is 3rd point actually not the conclusion instead of the 1st? -The enemy is in arms -therefore we must decrease spending in other sectors - because we need Money for weapons. So Why is the reaction to the Premise the conclusion Rather than the reason for the reaction, that is "we need the additional money.."?
Because the third point is a reason supporting the claim made in the first. What claim is the argument making? That we need to spend less money on space exploration. Why? Because the additional money can be used to purchase military equipment.
Michael, I truly appraciate the response, but your answer seems almost like a distinction without a difference. After further research I've concluded there is some flexibility when discussing the components of an argument.
i am taking the power of critical thinking course, so it will help me a lot so would you please explain about some and only mean? plz thank you and i like our explanation it is really helpful.
Quick query, I understand the standard form and could identify the premises and conclusions in this video. However, when reading longer texts do the premises have to be verbatim sentences from the argument or can they be paraphrased into more succinct statements? Great video, really helpful!
can someone help me with spotting the premise and conclusion with this 'the three Service Academies argue that combat training is by statute and policy for men only and that therefore they can properly exclude all women'
funky seagull you may not need this now but: Premise: Combat training is by statute and policy for men only. Conclusion: they can properly exclude women
Who else watchin this for philosophy or some other class?
here day before "critical thinking and argumentation" exam... its toughhhh
I am watching for the class of Critical Thinking and Logic ❤
I am watching this for the LSAT haha
I had a philosophy course last semester and now I’m entering my sophomore year and I have to get better prepared for the lsat
I am watching this for fun
This is a really straightforward and nicely prepared presentation. Thank you.
You’re so good!!!! I was struggling understanding the concept but you make it crystal clear!!!!!
Yes he did!! Thank gawd!!
I was struggling trying to complete my philosophy homework and this video really helped me with being able to identify the two. Thank you!
I was really struggling understanding my critical reasoning course and this helped me tremendously. Appreciate your gift and help
finally i understood concept
premise - mom , you are soo beautiful, i love you .
conclusion - i want a ps5.
This is the hardest part of learning logic so far for me. Thank you for this
A decade later and still an amazing simple explanation video
Kevin - I've always heard there are three main/basic components to an argument: The Premise (idea), The Warrant(s) (support) & The Claim(s) (conclusion) - You seem to be combining the Premise & Warrants - It clearly works and your explanation seems more succinct, but can you share some thoughts about my comment just the same?
Thanks Kevin
you are awsome!!! this is actually not boring because you make me think deeper so i dont get bored, thank you so much ,you are my life saver for today because i think i am going to pass my test
did u pass ur test homie? its been 4 years
OMG its same with me!!! Watching the whole series for a test tomorrow :)
That was really helpful for my personal studies, thank you for this.
Thanks for helping to hit home my PHI101 module.
Of all the possible examples you could have used, this s the one you start with. Yes, well done. I was looking for exercises to use with my students. Nonetheless, . . . . .
You just saved me from failing
The difference is between arguments and argumentation. In this video, he is just showing the basic components for an argument. In later videos he talks about what makes good arguments, which will include the warrant.
I believe I can now understand the difference, and what a premise actually is... Thank you so much for this video
good starting point to more learning about critical thinking
Very well done and that is of course my conclusion
Excellent video. Thank you for the help!
Great video - Thank you. I am using your videos for Homeschooling.
Thank you, It really helps me
Wow! what a wonderful job. You are the best. Thank you❤
Very nice format. A great informative series. Glad I found it!
Such a great and helpful video! I appreciate this more than you know!
Now I finally understand how to do this. ㅠㅠ Thank you
Thanks so much for this excellent explanation. This really helped!
Thank you.
Very nice, I liked it. Great content for digital marketers who write their own ads.
this is really supported presentation thanks Kevin
Really helped me with my report!! thank youuuu
Imagine paying for a college course just to be told to watch a UA-cam video for your education. This system is fucked
Thank you. This is Very welcome
Thank you so much, It's very helpful to me.
This video helped me so much! Thanks alot!
Why is 3rd point actually not the conclusion instead of the 1st? -The enemy is in arms -therefore we must decrease spending in other sectors - because we need Money for weapons. So Why is the reaction to the Premise the conclusion Rather than the reason for the reaction, that is "we need the additional money.."?
Because the third point is a reason supporting the claim made in the first. What claim is the argument making? That we need to spend less money on space exploration. Why? Because the additional money can be used to purchase military equipment.
awesome loud and clear.
This is beautiful...!!
Great video.. Thank you
Michael, I truly appraciate the response, but your answer seems almost like a distinction without a difference. After further research I've concluded there is some flexibility when discussing the components of an argument.
help me alot to understand 🤗😇
corona virus ugly ass got me here cuz my online class teacher can even explain this to me as much as you do sir. Thank you for the help sir
Thank you so much, helped me complete my homework.
This helped. Thank you
Very helpful thanks soo much 😊
Thank you ! you are really so helpful and nice ^^
In fact is a conclusion indicator, true or false
i am taking the power of critical thinking course, so it will help me a lot so would you please explain about some and only mean? plz thank you and i like our explanation it is really helpful.
thank you sir
Love the key words
Thank you it is helpful for me
What if theres 2 premise, if one premise supports the conclusion and one doesnt??
Thank you soo much! This really helped me!
Thank you so much. It is a big help.
Do identifying unstated premise
thank you!!
I'm a philosophy professor, would you mind if I steal some of your examples for my class?
Quick query, I understand the standard form and could identify the premises and conclusions in this video. However, when reading longer texts do the premises have to be verbatim sentences from the argument or can they be paraphrased into more succinct statements?
Great video, really helpful!
can you please help me with my philosophy homework??
can someone help me with spotting the premise and conclusion with this 'the three Service Academies argue that combat training is by statute and policy for men only and that therefore they can properly exclude all women'
funky seagull you may not need this now but:
Premise: Combat training is by statute and policy for men only.
Conclusion: they can properly exclude women
Thanks, Kevin, super helpful :)
thanks, that helped alot
1:15 1:48 3:50
Brilliant!! Many thanks or your efforts
thanks
how would I argue this in standard form "C: Therefore, It is not morally acceptable for people to sell their organs"
Cramming for my activities because it is due in 4 days and i haven't answered anything 👁️👄👁️
thanks for this vid
Uhhhhh...i don't get it 😑
GREAT
Still confusing without the indicators
Powerfull
Thank you!
i have an exam in two hours
😳
abortion is not wrong
papa pardon parle bien
Jsmeelghori
abortion is not wrong lol
Thank you!