Why benchmark on that potato of a map? The water in Ancient T spawn, with splashes from teammates running through, is the real low end test. It's possible even a 4090 is GPU limited there, but the newer maps in general are where real benchmarking takes place. Mirage is like a decade old.
"...is the real low end test. It's possible even a 4090 is GPU limited there" on this resolution (1280x960) there is no challenge for the 4090, unless you play max settings (what almost no1 plays) the map choise is because this map is the most played one.
why? you know the 9800x3d is around 4/5% faster than the 7800x3d on CS2, right!? So, my avg here is 622 fps if i add + 5% from the 9800x3d i will get avg 653 fps and lets add to the 9800x3d overheat and around + 30%40% power consumption... this is what you get if you have a 7800x3d and change to 9800x3d! btw, 5v5 comp match you can use a 500hz monitor and cap your fps at 360/410 fps. (5v5 match vs DM is very different performance) unless you know something that i dont know... if someone already owns a 7800x3d, i see no reason to change CPU atm.
@ Sir look at 1% lows which are 160-170 and 9800x3d 5 vs 5 competitive is above 240 . So if i have 240hz screen i will go for 9800x3d for better 1% lows .
because im playing DM vs bots what is very different than 5v5 comp. show me a video with 9800x3d vs the 7800x3d (real gameplay) where the 9800x3d is all that better.
@@FocusGamlng Sir i am talking about 5 vs 5 compi . Dm and all shit i dont care . Show me where 7800x3d 1% lows are above 240 fps in 5 vs 5 competitive !!
Why benchmark on that potato of a map? The water in Ancient T spawn, with splashes from teammates running through, is the real low end test. It's possible even a 4090 is GPU limited there, but the newer maps in general are where real benchmarking takes place. Mirage is like a decade old.
"...is the real low end test. It's possible even a 4090 is GPU limited there"
on this resolution (1280x960) there is no challenge for the 4090, unless you play max settings (what almost no1 plays)
the map choise is because this map is the most played one.
9800x3d is the way to go if u have 240hz screen
why?
you know the 9800x3d is around 4/5% faster than the 7800x3d on CS2, right!? So, my avg here is 622 fps if i add + 5% from the 9800x3d i will get avg 653 fps and lets add to the 9800x3d overheat and around + 30%40% power consumption... this is what you get if you have a 7800x3d and change to 9800x3d!
btw, 5v5 comp match you can use a 500hz monitor and cap your fps at 360/410 fps. (5v5 match vs DM is very different performance)
unless you know something that i dont know... if someone already owns a 7800x3d, i see no reason to change CPU atm.
@ Sir look at 1% lows which are 160-170 and 9800x3d 5 vs 5 competitive is above 240 . So if i have 240hz screen i will go for 9800x3d for better 1% lows .
because im playing DM vs bots what is very different than 5v5 comp.
show me a video with 9800x3d vs the 7800x3d (real gameplay) where the 9800x3d is all that better.
@@FocusGamlng Sir i am talking about 5 vs 5 compi . Dm and all shit i dont care . Show me where 7800x3d 1% lows are above 240 fps in 5 vs 5 competitive !!
@@FocusGamlng Sir , 9800x3d 5 vs 5 compi 1% lows are above 240. You can google and check urself. Else if u want i will share link for the same .