Space Force missile-warning satellite launches atop Atlas V rocket
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2021
- A United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket launched the Designated Space Based Infrared System Geosynchronous Earth Orbit Flight 5 (SBIRS Geo-5) satellite from Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on May 18, 2021. Full Story: www.space.com/atlas-v-rocket-...
Credit: ULA - Наука та технологія
I can't help it. Just hearing the words "United States Space Force" being uttered gave me such a thrill. I'm 76. I have lived to see and hear this. Oh thank You.
Very thumbs up. Whoever thought we'd be seeing this in our lifetimes. They are making magic happen. I just hope to stay alive long enough to see the first Americans on Mars establishing an American colony...or maybe it's the opportunity to solve man's tribal problems by establishing a multi-national colony, or will they fight and kill each other. Have we advanced beyond tribal warfare?
We had a "space force" it's called NASA.
@@Mozart1220
NASA is civilian. The Space Force is military. NASA explores space. The Space Force defends American interests in space. Huge difference.
Wish you many more years! It’s truly a time to be alive!
@@dalesajdak422 Yes, but I am disappointed I have not see Space Force in action yet. I think they are still making their ray guns and still being measured for their space suits.
The liftoff commentator is great.
Great visuals. A+.
No one is great as George diller!
And we only had to hear the word "Nominal" once, at the end.
After so much of space x lunch I always think that every booster will land back again
ikr feels a bit weird
SpaceX*
It's a new standard. The rest lack behind.
This method is so 80,s
@@drutalero2962 Depends on what your goals are (rate of launches and what the cargo will be). :)
Reusable only makes sense when you launch very often and only saves you around 10% at double the risk. If you want the math :
SpaceX said they can reuse a rocket at ~45% of the cost of a new one (this is if they reuse the whole rocket, which they don't, but lets say they do to put things in their favor).
A reusable rocket can take 30-50% LESS of the KG to LEO compared to a non-reusable. (due to being more heavy and the need of fuel for landing).
Falcon9 (reusable) 15.500kg (to LEO).
Falcon9 (expendable) 22.800kg (to LEO)
This means you have to launch ~twice for the same payload. So if you would save 50% on reusing it, it's the same cost as 1 non-reusable (KG to LEO).
So they save ~10% on reusing the rockets (payload to orbit wise). Assuming the COO of SpaceX was honest about being able to reuse the rocket at less than 50% the cost of a new one.
(Gwynne Shotwell - COO SpaceX, does seem to have the habbit of exaggerating a bit)
With a non-reusable rocket (which is 10% more expansive) you only launch 1 time.
With a reusable rocket, you need to launch 2 times and perform 2 landings (so, way more risk involved).
If 1 reusable rocket crashes in 10 launches, it would have saved them nothing compared to using non-reusable.
If 1 reusable rocket crashes in 20 launches, they only saved 5%.
etc
Average crashes with rockets are 1 out of 100. (if reliable rockets are being used)
And the above doesn't take into account, the *first/new* reusable rocket you have to build (which is 100% the cost and not 45%) and the increased risk damaging your launch/landing pad/site.
(or the double amount of fuel required)
etc
So if you plan to do a lot of launches in the upcoming decades and are positive you can make take-offs and landings very reliable (The convidence Elon/SpaceX has), reusable is the way to go. (if we assume reusable is actually a couple % cheaper).
If you launch a Mars-rover or satelite once in a couple year (spent over years / a decade and billions on a telescope), the decision to use a non-reusable at 10% higher cost to heavily reduce risk, makes way more sense.
And that is why those companies/agencies who use non-reusable, are NOT behind, but just choosing the type of rocket that makes most sense. :)
What SpaceX is doing now (VTVL rockets), was already tested decades ago. Not something new. Simply not interesting / lucrative enough (and perhaps still isn't. Time will tell. :)
Love that shot looking back to the pad...39 miles high and 68 miles down range and you can see the plume back at the pad! SO DAMN COOL!
Saw the launch plume from St Augustine today.
May I ask where is the "out of control" first stage of this rocket? I can not see a word from the news of any of medias.
@@feihuo7874 it’s not out of control...
@@Default012 Do you means the first stage of this rocket has been return to earth? and then can be used again like Falcon 9？ So, it's much different from the Long march 5B rocket?
innit, that go-pro is going places.
The Earth’s rotation really makes my day!
clever, I like it.
Feel it. How?
Get into a roller coaster.. press speed x3
Gravity is not your friend..😬
No, it Literally makes your day 🤦♂️.
@@-TheMaskedMan- That was his point...except he is too intelligent to have to hit people over the head with it....then it is not funny any more.
@@erepsekahs I know. I don’t know why I added the facepalm though because I knew it was a joke. Guess I better facepalm myself 🤦♂️.
the view of earth is just amazing!
It's an amazing planet, maybe the only one on Earth 😂🤣😃😄😅😆😆 One must remember that to Martians Mars looks just like home.😀
0:06 Atlas ignition sounds awesome!
Nominal, nominal, nominal. Nice shots. Looked more like stage sep camera angle from Apollo, nice!
Great lift off !
What does a non-great lift off look like....🤦♂️ anything that doesn't blow up is a great lift off...🤦♂️
Thank you for your sharing, oceanspace BBR
Somehow it just ain't the same when the payload is rooted in the making of war. Defense or not.
i agree
This payload has NO offensive capabilities. This is an early warning satellite to that has enhanced infrared detection capabilities to provide better early warning of launching of ballistic missiles. When you have dictators like Kim-Jong Un over in North Korea with the ability to lob missiles towards targets in the Pacific and potentially the western US--this capability is a vital component of our national defense.
Thank goodness not all humans are content with sticking their heads in the sand. We'd have never made it to space if so.
I think the same, space should never allow any kind of military activity, just scientific and economic exploration, it is a sacred place for this type of thing.
@@danielpava
What is ideal is not realistic. Space will be militarized regardless (you think China wants to keep space civilian?) and we need to be part of it to secure our interests and national security.
I was thinking about joining Space Force. I can’t seem to find a recruiter. I’m probably too old anyway
It split off from the Air Force, but maybe they still use the same recruiters.
Less than 3 minutes and we can make it to space. Wow
From the thumbnail I thought it was a custom painted atlas just for the space force
Beautiful
What is the object appearing at the the 1 o clock of the engine exhaust @5:32 of the vid? Is that a light anomaly? It looks as if it is accelerating towards the rocket.
My guess is its the 1st stage
Is the shaking engine bell on the RL10 normal? That did not look good.
1:00 this fluttering sound😎
Nice launch!! It's a beautiful rocket.
What is that resonant wobble on the 2nd stage rocket nozzle? That kind of extra force transferring into the rest of the launch chassis looks like it could become a major problem either structurally, or at the least, it could potentially decalibrate or even damage delicate sensors on the satellite bus. Doesn't look good at all.
I was waiting for the reentry, used to watch Spacex Falcon 9
Wait! Who’s outside the rocket at 9,000 mph holding the camera? Lol
dp they recover the SRB'S off these?
No. As far as I know only the space shuttle had solid rocket boosters that were recovered.
Why do they keep the SRBs so long after burnout? Isnt that just dead weight they are accelerating for 30 seconds?
I believe the ejection force is enough to throw it off trajectory and ruin the following burn.
My assumption was it was to ensure they land in the designated area of the ocean and have not chance of falling back onto land. I don't really know though
Now this is fast speed engines...
Congratulations.
Better than I thought.
0:54 seeing it break through the sound barrier. so cool
Anyone know why they wouldn’t use a SpaceX booster to launch? Assuming it would be much cheaper overall? Is due to it being a defense/security launch?
Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy are both certified to carry defense payloads. The Atlas V was used here because the satellite was built to fit into the Atlas V 4 meter payload fairing. The Atlas V used today was in the "421" configuration--4 meter fairing, 2 strap on boosters, and a one engine Centaur upper stage.
There are actually a lot of payloads not suitable for falcon heavy, simply because the size/shape of them doesn't fit into the fairings, which are the same size as from a regular falcon 9. Which means that falcon 9 heavy is sort of limited to only launching DENSE payloads to LEO or regular payloads to GEO.
@@KingCosmo7 thank you for confirming. And I’m guessing the fairing size isn’t something that can be easily changed?
I love the star wars look a like logo 😂
Good but we don’t have problem with early warning systems. Our problem is with the missiles fast enough to intercept hypersonic missiles
May I ask where is the "out of control" first stage of this rocket? I can not see a word from the news of any of medias.
It's not out of control, that's why.
An Atlas 5?. That’s a hold over from the lunar landing days. A boomer rocket........still getting the job done!
No point in changing what works 😉
can ı use your video
How did the booster landing turn out?
Boing, boing, splat
Ikea Flat-pack rocket booster....only put up once!
Do all those separation pieces fall back to earth or do they float around in orbit as more space junk?
I know that the satellite stays up there
So what about the debris？controllable? Do I need to wear a helmet?
Controlled (or maybe "aimed" is a better word) de-orbit into the ocean
Always wear a helmet
Aimed towards ocean, that’s one of the reasons they launch over large bodies of water.
So, did they land and recover the First Stage like SPACE-X?
No. Spacex is the only one to ever land a 1st stage ever.
No
Ula: We finally had a sucessful atlas v launch
Spacex: It is just a monday launching satellites on a falcon 9
great video, send me to mars... :)
1:25
When you play in the old tv
What are those floaters appearing at the end of the video 05:48
lens flare
what's with the wicked shimmy on the rocket cone of the second stage??
"Stand by for action. 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Thunderbirds are go!"
Did I miss the part when first stages falls on an unsuspecting population center below?
the rocket flies over the ocean during stage separation and the 1st stage splashes into the atlantic
This wasn’t launched in China
@@shinyy187 Right. You don't want to live down range of the Chinese launch pad. LOL
Burns cleaner than spacex
what's really going on?
It makes my July 4th celebrations look a little amateur. 😥
Now go watch the delta 2 rocket failure. It's most certainly the most spectacular explosion/firework you'll ever see.
Edit: Here's a link to it ua-cam.com/video/z_aHEit-SqA/v-deo.html
@@nagarjunkashyap5987 Did that. Was the rocket launched on the 4th of July by any chance?
@@nagarjunkashyap5987 jajajajajajajja seen that.
Pretty bad ass!!!
good launch
Very nice!!!
Amazing pictures
what's the purpose of space force'? plz explain someone
Everything space related that the original branches did has been put into one branch. Kind of like how the Air Force separated from the army
4:49, watch for that shadow above stage 2. For sure another object passing somewhere close to it
That shadow is from the payload fairing being jettisoned.
4:45 what was the shadow from?
Payload fairing jettison. You can see them in the rear after the shadow passes.
might have been a fairing half or something
it was a fairing
an alien...
@@Michael-kp7cq An Alien race known as "The Fairing". :-)
What's the beach cocoa ? Playa bonita?
Sure
Wow
Why does ULA's presentation have to look so bad? From the poor quality of cameras to the awful flight graphics on the left that are difficult to follow.
They're probably a little more concerned about getting the payload into space, the job they're being paid for.
Go Space Force
no thanks. I personally don’t think space force is a good idea. It’s a lot of money to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.
@@jakemckee2005
It’s a problem that will likely exist in the near future. It’s better to be prepared. If war ever breaks out between the US and China LEO will be a battleground and satellites will have to defend themselves/destroy enemy satellites. The US military is a behemoth but if it doesn’t secure it’s interests in space we’re at a disadvantage. The few billion dollars the Space Force gets annually are necessary in my opinion. Better safe than sorry.
@@dalesajdak422 well, destroying sats is not a good a idea. It just creates more space junk. And it won’t be worth losing our expensive sats too.
@@dalesajdak422 I personally think SF should be a subset of Space Command that only gets pulled out when needed.
@@dalesajdak422 so that way we would be safe and not sorry.
It's like we're making all the mistakes from those SCI-FI movies on purpose.
That thumbnail looks like a render
What is this vehicle for
Never mind awesome 🙌👏🙌👏
What is causing the shadow @ 4:47 ?
i thought the same... what is up there that is that big..?
Is this just a replacement for other satellites or something else? Because if this was a missile warning system it wouldn't matter when nuclear missiles have gone super sonic with virtually half or less the time of arrival.
Looks like SBIRS GEO-5. Still need to detect the launch to retaliate.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-Based_Infrared_System
Yeah, look good
missile-warning ?
Space Force!... What a joke!!
you will be saying that when we have to shoot down incoming missiles since we have such a weak bastard in office
@@evrydayamerican Thanks to the current president, we still have allies who have our backs so people DON'T shoot missiles at us.
Boy, the earth sure looks flat from that altitude. Young too!
Thank you NASA for the knowledge given to us for technological advancement. bravo for science
Spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace Fooooooooooooooorce!!!
Wow great job done congratulations 🎉 the good work done by team members congratulations from every indian for your team 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💐💐💐
Missile warning satellite? Were the other broken? The ground based radar not good enough? This wasnt a tracking satellite let's be honest.
This one has updated sensors. Ground based radar can’t pick up launches as they occur, only when the rocket is already in flight
nice
Atlas to launch a satellite?
What created the shadow ?
When the fairing was ejected it blocked the sun as it passed by.
@@my3dviews Thanks!
@@jasonanders7003 You're welcome. :-)
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
An old faithful servant is in the first step and is a Russian construction with the name RD-180.
Fortunately they are gonna replace it asap!!!
🚀🚀🚀🔥🔥🔥🇵🇭
Where is the Landing ?
No landing. It’s a disposable rocket. SpaceX spoils us ;)
hhhh
right? we are spoilt ^^
This isn't SpaceX 🚀 !!
What's the purpose of this? How it will works? Anyone??? 🧐🤔
Google is your friend:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-Based_Infrared_System
Is that the shadow of the moon at 4:47 ?
No, sir. Its the shadow of fairing
I hope the flat earthers are watching. 😊
They're in a corner shaking their heads, covering their ears, and mumbling: "Not real. Not real. Not real."
They'll as always state that it's a "fish eye" lense. LOL!
They’re crying that so many people are smarter than them
The also claim that it is just CGI.
Fisheye lens
Bring the commander back.
For f* sake, just write telemetry on the screen.
Hmmm...Anyone notice how slow these missiles are compared to ALL other missiles on take off?
And what’s up with the cartoon at 4:21 - it looks like it’s going down before that.
What's your point? They're not going to accelerate a payload at 100's of G's like a weaponised missile, it won't survive. These rockets are also much heavier.
@@Ethan_Roberts - perhaps they just land into the ocean to drop off supplies. Whats goes up must come down!
@@ithinkthonkthunk5333 No, the satellite goes into orbit.
@@Ethan_Roberts perhaps on a big balloon - what goes up must come down!
@@ithinkthonkthunk5333 except when it’s attained an orbital velocity
Should have went with space X and saved some money !
Don’t they know 1st stage boosters land all the time 🤷🏻♂️
5:47...Is that the Moon????
Right now the Moon is in the East ..day sky 3:50 EST.
One step at a time, space becomes militarized, we will tell our children when the space was only used for exploring and not for war.
The first military satellite was launched in 1959. So, it has been militarized as long as they had the capability to launch large enough satellites.
@@my3dviews It's a little different when we have weapons orbiting the Earth, which is where things will end up.
@@midesti First, they are part of the Outer Space Treaty, which banns weapons in space. Second, there isn't much of an advantage to having weapons in orbit, other than for destroying other satellites. For weapons with ground targets it is a disadvantage as it limits where the weapon could be targeted as the orbit would need to line up at the given time for where it would need to be deployed. Whereas a weapon that is not already in orbit can be sent to any location on Earth within an hour or so.
@@my3dviews Militaries have already designed weapons systems intended to attack ground targets from orbit.
www.businessinsider.com/air-force-rods-from-god-kinetic-weapon-hit-with-nuclear-weapon-force-2017-9
@@midesti I know all about that weapon and it is not very useful. It can only hit a target that is in line with its orbit, which is a huge limitation. It could take several hours for it to pass over its intended target.
Here's a quote from the site you linked "The project as seen as prohibitively expensive". Launching a very heavy tungsten rod into orbit is not cheap. Quote "The cost of $230 million a rod was unimaginable during the Cold War." Today that would be much higher.
You would need dozens of these weapons in various orbits to have one ready to hit the necessary target within a short enough time. So, not a very efficient way of doing things.
You are much better off with a sea launched weapon or an ICBM which can be directed at any target.
The only good use of space for the military is spy satellites, which they already use.
A Space Force huh, is there a reason to protect earth atmosphere or whatever they planning to protect outer space? Are we going to see a aliens invasion soon🤣
Yep. All nations on the earth are peaceful, passive, benevolent, and true to their word. None of them pursue dominion over others. It's just human nature. History agrees.
@@everenigmatic5805 Space is different. Countries do actually work together for the most part.
@@jakemckee2005
That’s a result of the unipolar world we lived in for the last thirty years and are now leaving. Before the fall of the USSR we did not cooperate in space (besides the publicity stunt that was Apollo-Soyuz). As China becomes more powerful space will be like it was then: just another theater of cold war.
@@dalesajdak422 Mir.
@@dalesajdak422 well yeah, we’ll be competitive with China. But I don’t think that will be knocking each other’s satellites out, it’ll be the first man on Mars.
5:35 ufo showing off?
What was i doing with my life..
Wtf did you see the UFO's appear at 5:34 And second one just appeared at 5:51 🚀👽
Still waiting for that landing video from China........ Any1 seen it yet?? Or even a real picture?
earth's curve at 2.25. take that flat earthers
NO!NO!NO!FISH EYE LENSE!LOL! Gawd! The flat earth's will be out soon. It's almost dark here!😁😁😁😁
Was "Space Force" really the best we could do?
It makes sense. Air Force for the air, space force for space.
They probably work for national security state
Can we stop using imperial measure and make space metric only
How about we throw away all this rocket technology and start building space battle fortresses and battleships damn.......
But NASA can't land their booster
Right ?
Only spacex can
This rocket isn’t from nasa either
@@wazda6488 yep