Same-sex Marriage: Should They Be Legalised? | What Is LGBTQ+ | Mumbaikars React

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 252

  • @c.d.4780
    @c.d.4780 Рік тому +32

    Nice. Next time ask gay and lesbians what they feel about this issue since THEY are the ones getting married to same sex. What's the point of everyone else's opinion?

  • @Adiiitisii
    @Adiiitisii Рік тому +25

    COMMENT SECTION IS INTELLIGENT. ONLY INTELLIGENT ONE COULD UNDERSTaND WHY IT SHOULD BE LEGaL.

    • @Chakerdhar_arya
      @Chakerdhar_arya Рік тому +4

      Then I am not....

    • @srikrishna2561
      @srikrishna2561 Рік тому +6

      People with common sense can understand why it's illegal and it must be.
      (Not meant to offend those who support it)

    • @Biodigitalist
      @Biodigitalist 6 місяців тому +1

      @@srikrishna2561No, they don’t

  • @AdityaSingh-ox7ni
    @AdityaSingh-ox7ni Рік тому +8

    the question is even if they legalize same sex marriage, will it be applicable to only the hindu marriage act or even the muslim marriage act and christian marriage act?

    • @subhasreepanda3916
      @subhasreepanda3916 Рік тому +1

      i mean , the muslim marriage act still allows polygamy and child marriage. so i don't really think so. for christian, maybe.

    • @AdityaSingh-ox7ni
      @AdityaSingh-ox7ni Рік тому +1

      @@subhasreepanda3916 💀💀💀

    • @SayHisNameAd
      @SayHisNameAd Рік тому +4

      It will be under the secular marriage code (special marriage act). The SC said that they would not be touching personal laws (Hindu, Muslim or Christian laws).

    • @subhasreepanda3916
      @subhasreepanda3916 Рік тому

      @@SayHisNameAd oh ohk. makes sense. thanks

    • @AdityaSingh-ox7ni
      @AdityaSingh-ox7ni Рік тому

      @@SayHisNameAd thankgod this makes a lot more sense, there were rumors that the plea affected only the hindu marriage act

  • @Dhiraj-May8
    @Dhiraj-May8 Рік тому +32

    Homosexuality was there before any religion came into existence!!..it's not ..ki Heterosexuality 1 billion years pehle aaya aur Homosexuality 10 yrs pehle existence mein aaya ....😊..what a funny joke !!

    • @srikrishna2561
      @srikrishna2561 Рік тому +2

      What's the evidence for it being that old ?

    • @ridhimadas1965
      @ridhimadas1965 Рік тому +5

      @@srikrishna2561 read about Indian culture ,Kamasutra has mentions of same sex couples,there is a mention of lesbian couple in ramayan,and also lesbians were called swarinis in ancient India and there are also scriptures of gay couples in khajuraho temple from mediaval India,Also their was a text from ancient egypt of a gay couple dating back to 2500 bce.

    • @SahajaGangavarapu
      @SahajaGangavarapu Рік тому

      @@ridhimadas1965 Mam, the same Kamasutra book author(Rishi Vastayana) clearly mentioned in his book that " he was covering this homosexual topic only bcoz it's matter of subject and as it was his duty to cover whole 360 degrees of the subject to give a wider view about sexuality for any reader of his book" he also cautioned us that homosexuality mentions in his work is purely for knowledge purpose only, not for application at least not in open and legal way in their privacy they can do watever they want. So, mam plzz try and understand this sacred book is for subjective & referencial purpose to deal with such sexuality related queries ,confusions & problems so i request u don't try to look as some kind of justification in order to do watever we want and insult such great Rishi Vastayana who wrote it for the welfare of the society and whole of humankind..........🙏🙏

    • @aarongomez2666
      @aarongomez2666 Рік тому +2

      @@srikrishna2561 These are epigenetic traits. They don't just pop into existence. These traits have been present in our gene pool for as long as human beings have existed.

  • @tejug1161
    @tejug1161 Рік тому +20

    1. Because of the societal pressure and stigma against gay people, many gay men still marry straight women. The lives of these men and women is far worse than hell! Loneliness becomes their life. Hence, Gay people should be allowed to marry.
    2. However, gay rights should stop here with marriage, health insurance, etc. Trans women should not be allowed to participate in women's competitions or should not able to get jobs under women's quota. Create a completely different category for gay and trans people legally. Just like there are men's and women's tournaments, there should be separate tournaments for trans men and women in which they can compete with each other. We don't need to ape each and everything that US does! US society is collapsing and is headed towards a race and gender war.

    • @nobodyknows228
      @nobodyknows228 Рік тому

      These are very good points actually but this is where it starts before it gets out of control. To be really honest I think LGBTQ+ are just dillusional and depressed people. They need help not special rights. There is no scientific evidence that proves me wrong. We should be worried about a 2 front war with china and pakisthan, we will be needing loads of smart intelligent alpha men and women for that. Allowing them to marry and have kids will have a terrible effect on the society. They start raising their kids as theybies, lets them decide their sexuality from very young age and starts injecting hormones to change the sex and apparently somehow governament supports this in the US and UK. They become teachers and start educating kids about the 100000000000000000000 genders that exist, and manipulate them to chose anything except what they are. The majority of the country doen't want this.

    • @jivabhise2817
      @jivabhise2817 Рік тому +4

      Why a different category for LGBA ?? There were never confused of their gender, they were confused about sexual orientation....they were are and will be of same gender, will recognise of that gender, just like everyone else.. Category only for TQI people....they are confused of their genders...but again not reservation (just category, as giving special reservation would again cause problems)

    • @JS-mn4xs
      @JS-mn4xs Рік тому +1

      Teju ji aap bohot zyada american right wing ko dekh rahe ho. Matt Walsh aur Ben Shapiro ko sunn k please apna dimaag na kharab kare. Woh aapko hate karte hai coz you're a pagan.

    • @nobodyknows228
      @nobodyknows228 Рік тому

      @@JS-mn4xs Ben Shapiro and Matt Walsh might be extreme right but they still make more sense than than most left. It is not healthy for the society but as long there exist people like wendy williams, oprah, kamala harris, cardi b we need people like matt walsh, jordan peterson and ben shapiro. Feminists and LGBTQ+ also openly hate Men and especially White Men, what about that, but you only have problem with with these people trying to talk some sense to their thick heads.

    • @tejug1161
      @tejug1161 Рік тому +1

      @@jivabhise2817 Agreed. All I meant was is that the trans women should not hog the benefits of actual women. I am not a bigot but I do believe in some sanity and boundaries.

  • @vamshiabhilash
    @vamshiabhilash Рік тому +36

    Bruh did the advocate say hea attracted to his sister bruhh WTF 😂

    • @slowsurferZ
      @slowsurferZ Рік тому +6

      i think they did that to make a point about consenting adults and their private lives 🌚

    • @vamshiabhilash
      @vamshiabhilash Рік тому +1

      @@slowsurferZ ohh okay got it

    • @vikshri8387
      @vikshri8387 Рік тому +5

      He is just presenting the actual scenario of America and whatever happening over there.

    • @Kris-br3nz
      @Kris-br3nz Рік тому

      ​@@slowsurferZ except equal rights.. Heterosexuals can't have legal incestouse unions so don't homosexuals.. That's how equality works

    • @newsjunkieish
      @newsjunkieish Рік тому

      He is sharing misconceptions to question "two consenting adults".
      Its hilarious how he is thinking of incest straight away. Most people lump paedophiles, incestuous relationships and LGBTQI in the same category of sexual perversity.
      Incidentally, LGBTQI is sexual orientation.
      And Paedophilia and incest are sexual ACTIVITY. It's mostly straight people who get caught doing paedophilia and incest.

  • @yashsaha7834
    @yashsaha7834 Рік тому +25

    This is high time to legalize same sex marriage in India

  • @ysoserious4356
    @ysoserious4356 Рік тому +14

    The fact that our religion is not against LGBTQ but people doesnt know it yet and telling its against our culture is the problem here..if u still have doubts..please read ramayana, Mahabharata and also go and see the sculptures in temples!! Especially here in south indian temples u can see many homosexual sculptures in their walls..

    • @srikrishna2561
      @srikrishna2561 Рік тому +1

      The Eras of Ramayana and Mahabharata are different.

    • @srikrishna2561
      @srikrishna2561 Рік тому +1

      And where does Ramayana and Mahabharata support Trans ?

    • @RashmiKumari-xf2lf
      @RashmiKumari-xf2lf Рік тому +2

      ​@@srikrishna2561read again it does

  • @cre8ives2dio
    @cre8ives2dio Рік тому +7

    It's not illegal to be the same sex married couple... But it's actually a case of Legal recognition

  • @Cri-cater
    @Cri-cater Рік тому +38

    Cultures are meant to be evolved but there should be a think tank to keep watch on the resulting changes while that evolution is in action. If the SC allows the SS marriages then we surely should have SC appointed intellectuals to keep close watch on the results.

    • @newsjunkieish
      @newsjunkieish Рік тому +6

      What do you expect to happen if two people marry? The crux is consent between two adults.

    • @nobodyknows228
      @nobodyknows228 Рік тому

      @@newsjunkieish You have no clue whats happening in US. 1/3 of Genz are LGBTQ+ and IQ is lower than ever. And regarding the concent thing. It should be okay to marry ones mother, brother, sister and father with mutual concent right according to your logic?

    • @Sachin_y28
      @Sachin_y28 Рік тому +1

      So u accept incest also! Culture should change but in a right direction!

    • @newsjunkieish
      @newsjunkieish Рік тому +5

      @@Sachin_y28 No one is suggesting incest or paedophilia here. Know the difference. And don't try to compare apples and turnips.

    • @Sachin_y28
      @Sachin_y28 Рік тому +3

      @@newsjunkieish how u can discriminate them! It's not thier fault! Nature made them like ppl in LGBTQ! So legalise then also

  • @tejasbhagat4444
    @tejasbhagat4444 Рік тому +20

    0:06 homosexuality in hindu culture? Asking a woman who hasn't read a hindu book since ages. Nice

    • @adityadwivedi7672
      @adityadwivedi7672 Рік тому +3

      What books have you read on the hindu culture ? Can you list a few ....

    • @semiconductor5
      @semiconductor5 Рік тому +3

      You are commenting like your are too mastered in every 'Hindu book'.

    • @krishnkant9477
      @krishnkant9477 Рік тому +4

      You are acting as if you have read all the Hindu texts.
      Homosexuality was never celebrated in Hinduism (at least in the form today it is seen). At best it was tolerated
      I challenge you to show even a single verse from Hindu texts which approves homosexuality.

    • @palashbhuyan8026
      @palashbhuyan8026 Рік тому +9

      1.Brihannala (Arjuna transformation into transgender)
      2.Mohini ( Lord Vishnu transformed himself into a female body).
      3.Siva and Parvati merge themselves into one body.

    • @adityadwivedi7672
      @adityadwivedi7672 Рік тому +3

      @@palashbhuyan8026 none here is a transgender. Arjuna became a female. Mohini was a female, shiva and Parvati's merge was something else altogether. Stop giving examples like these to portray your pettiness and lack of knowledge.

  • @gajabalaji
    @gajabalaji Рік тому +18

    A marriage doesn't end with two people. A marriage will get a fulfillment when two people have children of their own flesh and blood. That's what they're actually leaving behind in the world. They live with the social status called 'Family'. Family is more of a social and natural phenomenon than a constitutional phenomenon. Its far greater than sex. Family is the fundamental construct of our country. Court must be very careful in interfering in this.

    • @muskanpatel1433
      @muskanpatel1433 Рік тому +13

      okay so what about a infertile women or a man with low sperm count..not all straight couples can have children... so according to u they shouldn't be allowed get married

    • @srikrishna2561
      @srikrishna2561 Рік тому +2

      ​@@muskanpatel1433 They are unfortunate exceptions.
      We can't make it as the norm.
      And what do you mean by Straight ?
      They are Normal.

    • @Kris-br3nz
      @Kris-br3nz Рік тому +7

      ​@@srikrishna2561lmao so exceptions make it.. Good.. Same sex couples are also part of that exception then

    • @saurabhdixit1987
      @saurabhdixit1987 Рік тому

      ​@@srikrishna2561what is your problem. Gtfo. Let people live. Who are you?

    • @tnjvedits7919
      @tnjvedits7919 Рік тому +1

      ​@@Kris-br3nzno(

  • @cintaapakah5799
    @cintaapakah5799 Рік тому +15

    Love is love. Love is beautiful. I agree LGBTQ marriage

    • @SDRicky
      @SDRicky 9 місяців тому

      Really? Food Is food. Will you eat cockroaches 😂

    • @meerosman9696
      @meerosman9696 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@SDRicky it's like calling you a flat earth believer. 😂😂 Both context are irrelevant though

    • @SDRicky
      @SDRicky 9 місяців тому

      @@meerosman9696 well kinda , anyway it's their life they can get married to any animal they want , none of my business, xd

    • @kailaehverma9741
      @kailaehverma9741 8 місяців тому

      Why I can't marry my sister love is love 😂😂

    • @yuvrajs.8109
      @yuvrajs.8109 4 місяці тому

      ​@@SDRicky Animals cannot consent, neither can children. Marriage is between two consenting adults and is no one's buisness. You have serious issues if you're concerned with what other people do in bed

  • @abhinaba_pal
    @abhinaba_pal Рік тому +16

    The debate is not going on across the country, the discussion is just going on the T1 cities among the people who has lost their parental culture and are focussing on International stuffs. If you really want to discuss it, take surveys to the T2, T3 cities.

    • @Sachin_y28
      @Sachin_y28 Рік тому +3

      Waha pe mar ke bhaga dega

    • @siddhantjadhav2793
      @siddhantjadhav2793 Рік тому +1

      How ridiculous! Ancient Hindu culture was more open, it still is, but the Islamics imposed harsh gender segregation and purdah system upon Hindu society, the the British imposed prude Christian beliefs as well like criminalizing relations between same gendered persons. What two or more consenting adults do in their bedroom is none of anyone's concern. I am against child adoption for homosexual couples tho. And the residents of T1 cities like Mumbai are fortunately more liberal in the traditional sense. Ultra progressivism is as harmful as ultra conservatism.

    • @muskanpatel1433
      @muskanpatel1433 Рік тому +3

      t2 and t3 cities and not much educated so whats the point.. u can't ask a science question to a humanities student and then expect them to give an ans

    • @Kris-br3nz
      @Kris-br3nz Рік тому

      If we take surverys of T2 and T3 cities on inter faith marriage you'll get a big disapproval lol even in 2023..😂 .. Rights are not based on approval or disapproval of the next person.. If we took mens views to give women the same right to vote.. We still won't have it.. Lol..

    • @Kris-br3nz
      @Kris-br3nz Рік тому

      ​@@siddhantjadhav2793same sex couples can and should be equally allowed to adopt... Single parent adoption is legal in this country.. Are u going to tell us two parents are worse than 1 ?

  • @mr.phantom6969
    @mr.phantom6969 Рік тому +4

    Homosexuality is there from beginning of mankind
    But same sex marriage was never present
    And that's is what most people are against

    • @srikrishna2561
      @srikrishna2561 Рік тому +1

      Evidence ?

    • @Kris-br3nz
      @Kris-br3nz Рік тому +2

      ​@@srikrishna2561science

    • @cr-pz5ou
      @cr-pz5ou 10 місяців тому

      ​@@Kris-br3nzgive us reference from science

    • @Kris-br3nz
      @Kris-br3nz 10 місяців тому

      @@cr-pz5ou google homosexuality in nature and then wear a clown mask

  • @differentbutIwanttolivemylife
    @differentbutIwanttolivemylife Рік тому +2

    If Kapil sibbal is advocate 😳 tab main anpadh hi achcha hu

  • @Tri30681
    @Tri30681 Рік тому +2

    Or jo Mahila ya Purush bachhe payda nehi kar sakte,usko ap Mard ya Mahila nehi manoge,hai na?

  • @Sachin_y28
    @Sachin_y28 Рік тому +1

    Saare netflex wale liberals h. Really US mentally hegemony dal de rha h.we are free but nit free from ideology! Mostly people are induced ideas by west. Lgbtqke aane se us ka hegemony aur lgbtq market bahut badhe ga.

    • @newsjunkieish
      @newsjunkieish Рік тому +6

      Bhai sahab/ behenji, what will you say about middle aged gays who grew up in the era of Doordarshan and many people didn't even have possess a TV. Many of these people are also BJP voters and politically conservative. So stuff your half-baked conspiracy theories.

    • @Sachin_y28
      @Sachin_y28 Рік тому +3

      @@newsjunkieish how dare u to assume my gender! Narrow minded

    • @newsjunkieish
      @newsjunkieish Рік тому

      @@Sachin_y28 Hahaha... Get a life man.

    • @pritam90able
      @pritam90able Рік тому

      ​@@Sachin_y28but did you answer the question above??

    • @emptyradiation9271
      @emptyradiation9271 Рік тому

      well that fellow Homo sapien didn't assume ur gender

  • @Burritoisbored
    @Burritoisbored 9 місяців тому +1

    "Gay, lesbian everyone is ultimately a human. Why do we decide on depriving them of their human rights. We're all people after all. Love everyone" ☝🤓

  • @Impedance_Z
    @Impedance_Z Рік тому

    Based Uncle 4:57

  • @vikshri8387
    @vikshri8387 Рік тому +4

    Why this pandemic is mostly spread in the western countries, some little bit in metropolitan Indian cities but not in Indian villages?

    • @JS-mn4xs
      @JS-mn4xs Рік тому +13

      The same reason why divorces are less in eastern nations like india as a whole and villages in particular. Acceptance, taboo and the real danger that you will get your head chopped off if you go against societal norms. I don't think it should be that difficult to understand . Baaki saare matters mei you guys keep saying that we should look at things from an indic lens and not from a colonial perspective. But abhi jab baat same sex marriage par aata hai tab you're so damn okay important homophobic outlook of the church.

    • @divyanshsingh1078
      @divyanshsingh1078 Рік тому

      its just freedom of expressing yourself, go to a village and dance naked or kiss in public, you will be killed lol. and i guess, you watch some alpha strong men who says this lgbt is bad and unnatural. bro lgbt has been existing since earth was made. and guess what, no one can stop lgbt becoming legal. not even your so called strong alpha males

    • @user-bw8yn3zr1s
      @user-bw8yn3zr1s Рік тому +8

      Because no one wants to die before they get their rights, you see. That's why they just carry on a mundane meaningless life seeing evil people dancing around them.

    • @semiconductor5
      @semiconductor5 Рік тому +7

      Why do you even care wheather it be cities or Village it's person life you shouldn't be the one to dictate other life.

    • @DeepakKumar-xd1yw
      @DeepakKumar-xd1yw Рік тому +3

      Lol I'm from Village in Bihar. There is 1 openly gay guy 😂😂 .

  • @tejasbhagat4444
    @tejasbhagat4444 Рік тому +5

    Why are such laws not passed by parliament. Supreme court imposes their decision on Indian society. Let people of India by an act decide if sane sex marriages should exist

    • @irakulkarni5445
      @irakulkarni5445 Рік тому +8

      The common population is not entitled to decide the rights of a community

    • @Dhiraj-May8
      @Dhiraj-May8 Рік тому +8

      99 percent of India population don't know what.. LGBTQIA stands for..and what's the history of LGBTQIA in India..Yeh toh wahi baat ho gayi...sabji kaatne wala .. Human surgery bhi kar sakta hai😊😊😊😊

    • @coin_o_logy
      @coin_o_logy Рік тому +1

      ​@@Dhiraj-May8Please present your 99% survey data .
      THANK YOU in advance

    • @tejasbhagat4444
      @tejasbhagat4444 Рік тому +1

      @@irakulkarni5445 why not? Dint you want common people to accept them? You live in society with people, you are not forming a seperate nation for yourself

    • @tejasbhagat4444
      @tejasbhagat4444 Рік тому

      @@coin_o_logy just go out of home and ask common people

  • @shaikhshaikh487
    @shaikhshaikh487 Рік тому

    No.

  • @estheremily4921
    @estheremily4921 Рік тому

    I'm always against it being a true Christian Bible says this is the biggest sin that God hates and that kind of people will be punished...

    • @srikrishna2561
      @srikrishna2561 Рік тому +1

      I normally don't support or oppose Christianity but I support you for this aspect.

  • @itachiofthesharingan67
    @itachiofthesharingan67 Рік тому +2

    I fear the day some 80-year-old man wants to marry a 20-year-old and say, "Love is Love.".....India needs Islamic values

    • @Sachin_y28
      @Sachin_y28 Рік тому +4

      No son will marry his own mother becx love is love!

    • @RyanFeatherston
      @RyanFeatherston Рік тому

      As long as that 80 year old and 20 year old aren't related and the marriage is consensual, what's the big deal?

    • @itachiofthesharingan67
      @itachiofthesharingan67 Рік тому +1

      @@RyanFeatherston It's a very big deal ....I guess you are not from India so there is cultural differences..

    • @RyanFeatherston
      @RyanFeatherston Рік тому +1

      @@itachiofthesharingan67 My present location is immaterial to this discussion.

    • @wreyamon4472
      @wreyamon4472 Рік тому +7

      Well, in Islamic societies, a 50+ years old man is allowed to marry a 9 year old girl child.
      😂

  • @srikrishna2561
    @srikrishna2561 Рік тому +2

    Basic Aspects of Marriage :
    1. Long Term (Lifelong under normal circumstances) Relationship between Adult. Male and Adult Female.
    2. Union of Two Families (under Normal Circumstances).
    3. Most Importantly, Procreation.
    The very reason these organs are there is for reproduction.
    If none of these objectives can be achieved with this, then this isn't marriage at all.
    This is a different form of consensual relationship.
    And it needs to be respected, but not propagated and spreaded.
    But it is not Marriage.

    • @Kris-br3nz
      @Kris-br3nz Рік тому

      U cannot propagate or spread this as much u can't do it for inter faith or inter racial marriage lol

    • @emptyradiation9271
      @emptyradiation9271 Рік тому +1

      well so u mean a heterosexual family consisting of a unfertile partner can't be a family

    • @aarongomez2666
      @aarongomez2666 Рік тому +2

      Neither you nor your religion (if you follow any) decides what somebody else's marriage is.
      Marriage is a special union between two consenting adults and has nothing to do with anybody outside that marriage.
      And not everybody marries for procreation. Procreation is merely your vague subjective idea of a marriage.

  • @DivyaNayak
    @DivyaNayak Рік тому

    3:01 - heights of dumbness

  • @hrishikesh.joshi15
    @hrishikesh.joshi15 7 місяців тому

    Water is Water drink it from toilet😑😌

    • @sm_91
      @sm_91 21 день тому

      😂

  • @Farhan_in_Delhi
    @Farhan_in_Delhi Рік тому

    Doomed city

  • @rajendradangi2585
    @rajendradangi2585 Рік тому

    They deserve everything but not marriage this must be meant only for heterosexual. Simple.

    • @SomyaGupta-qz7bl
      @SomyaGupta-qz7bl 8 місяців тому

      Why?

    • @saamiali4830
      @saamiali4830 7 місяців тому

      ​@@SomyaGupta-qz7blbecause gender matters, all stupid people are saying gender shouldn't matter, if gender didn't matter then why would there be 3 biological genders? Everyone would be male or everyone would be female or everyone would be Transgender, our purpose of marriage is procreation in any religion you be it Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism etc... and you cannot procreate with the same gender.
      2nd point being that male and female are equal bur different, every child needs one father and one mother idealistically, imagine a kid who has 2 fathers or 2 mothers, would you say they are privileged or do you think they would lack certain aspects?

    • @SomyaGupta-qz7bl
      @SomyaGupta-qz7bl 7 місяців тому

      @@saamiali4830 1st thing...3 sexes not gender....2nd thing.... if any doesn't want to have a baby... so would be their marraige against YOUR religion... 3 rd thing... now u tell me... what is fair?? Being a orphan or being a child of loving parents who would never make u feel different from others bcoz that's how they had passed their childhood... and 4 thing... vese hi india ki population kam nhi hai... procreate karna band karo

    • @saamiali4830
      @saamiali4830 7 місяців тому

      @@SomyaGupta-qz7bl actually it is against religion if you're marrying without the aim of procreation which is obvious, even legally, not wanting a child is a ground fot divorce. Bachche nhi chahiye toh mat Karo na shaadi.
      Take the example of India itself, what do you think would happen if a child who starts going to a good school and everything but has 2 fathers??? Be honest, he would trolly have suicidal thoughts daily and it wouldn't even be his/ her fault.

    • @SomyaGupta-qz7bl
      @SomyaGupta-qz7bl 7 місяців тому

      @@saamiali4830 jis bachche ke 2 father ya 2 mother hai...toh agar voh school gya...toh kya hoga?? Tum hi btao kyuki mujhe nhi pta....duari baat procreate jhruri nhi hai ho... yeh couples pe nirbhar karta hai

  • @LenuskaswaLenuskaswa
    @LenuskaswaLenuskaswa Рік тому

    ❤❤❤😢 WhatsApp call Adhikar