On the asshole scale I'd rate the Colbert as roughly 0.8 Smolensks, or almost 0.5 Carriers. Insta: instagram.com/flamugram/ Stream: www.twitch.tv/flamuu Twitter: twitter.com/flamuchz Discord: discord.gg/Flamu
I play smolensk because on the asshole scale it rates as 1.5 smolensk, and if I have learned anything from spaceballs it is that you cannot escape the assholes.
@Zbriu Regardless, I still don't believe you. Yamato is still a beast and if not for the Kremlin, the best t10 BB as well. You probably play it too close? And you can't really see if your aim is bad if it is so all the time.
@Zbriu I think it depends hard on RNG. Had a 250k battle in my Yamato with Yamamoto yesterday . Got kraken and it was just brutal. But sometimes I struggle to get even 100k because everything overpens, even bbs showing full broadside just overpen.
@@Anldiot69 I have only had a few 200k+ matches, the rest are about 80k on average. I consider a 130k game to be really good. I also use the legendary mod but it still shoots like crap. Aiming a little high or low to compensate for turns still does not help. Nothing does. I agree that the yami USED TO BE the best, but now it is the worst. It really pisses me off because it was my first t10 ship and it took me a long time to get it.
@@sorrynotsorry8224 Not to forget the stupidity of teh enemy in some games. I mean u can also get 2 dev strikes in 5 mins if you get lucky and the enemy plays braindead.
510mm shells aswell 100% fire Chance ignoring all reductions and zones While at it, how about guns that shoot up and then the shell does 90 deg turn so flight time to 20km is just 20s or so
@@SadMarinersFan R36M2 ICBM Launchers (12 per ship) on new 1km Concealment dd? Can be launched after 10s from game start, do 200k dmg each regardless off class, apply 4 fires to every ship in 10km radius of impact, 100% hit probability I think that does it? Thats the "I win" - card
@@olsenfernandes3634 no problem but personally I dont see why the italian cruiser wants to borrow he shells of a completely different calibre since all Italians use 6inch or 8 inch shells but colbert and smolensk use 5 inch and 5.1 inch shells lol
Such a nice helipad on the back of that boat...really helps it blend into the current WW2 meta lol ...cant wait for the Ticonderoga class to enter the game now
@@RedXlV You dead right!...I was surprised to learn that she had a helipad in her designs as early as 1953! (She looks like a 60-70s crusier compared to the rest lol) 07
"i'm guessing he didn't see that shimakaze earlier" very interesting looking shimakaze he was shooting at, did i stumble onto a jingles video by accident?
WG: some light cruisers are overperforming with HE, so we are looking at nerfing IFHE across the board for balancing purposes. WG: let's add Smolensk & Colbert with outrageous HE DPM & fire chances, that is balanced. P.S. Proposed IFHE nerfs would not apply to the small caliber "DD guns" on Smolensk & Colbert. That is for more "balancing".
I can atone to many BBs staying the hell away from early and even mid-game engagements at higher tiers. I mean I tried to push a cap and guess what was behind an island? A smolensk and a colbert. Together. My Kurfurst has seen better days...
@@trevor7873 their AA does 0 damage if you come with bombers/torpedos cross the island. I mean it starts shooting very close range so no flakes. Drop and go base
I remember starting playing this game in 2017 and when looking through the forums for advice, I only saw people rambling how the Khaba was all damage, no teamplay. 2 years later and Im left scratching my head.
Three things I feel need to be said: 1: This ships anthem should be Firestarter by The Prodigy 2: With the number of shells all I could think of is the quote from 300: Persians: "We shall fire so many arrows we will blot out the sun" Spartans: "Then we shall fight in the shade" 3: When are you going to get a 1000 hits with shells? I've seen you get so close so many times, but yet I wait.
I toured the ship when he was in Bordeaux, France, before he was destroyed, such an awesome piece of history ! After that I decided to help a local association by becoming a tourist guide aboard the DD Maillé Brézé in Nantes (which is also an awesome piece of history ! ) :)
Loving these videos Flamu. Btw, can you make a similar video about map positioning but with BBs and CVs? The choice of BBs and CVs are completely up to you though. Other than that, keep it up!
they release beauties like this one and the smolensk. then soon hopefully the pobeda which will be their direct counter because it can blap them instantly from yamato-like ranges...so everyone will want one. and we shall call this 'world of warships - next Gen madness' /sarcasm off
There should be a mod that allows you to hear Dio screaming "MUDA MUDA MUDA" whenever you open fire with ships with crazy rate of fire like Colbert, Smolensk, Harugumo, and so on. That would make ships like these more tolerable :D
Something that should be noted is that the Colbert is just fat enough to catch BB AP citadels whereas the Smolensk quite reliably gets overpenned. Really the only times I've ever citadeled a Smolensk in a BB is if it was angled just enough to give me the maximum volume of citadel hitbox without being at an autobounce angle, or if I aimed low to use the water slowing down the shell. Naturally neither of those two instance are something I'd say is a reliable approach (angle just a bit more and the shells just bounce and aiming low always comes with a good chance of dispersion putting the shells a bit too early in the water where they just splash harmlessly). With the Colbert, no such problems.
While I'd never let myself buy a Smolensk, I'm actually willing to do the grind for a Colbert. It's a lot more work for a worse ship, but I'd rather have something that actually has some risks to using it. Smolensk just doesn't have any risks.
Smolensk has no risks shows how much you know. Everyone that owns a smolensk has never been killed or blapped. If you want to be invincible get a smolensk. Dont believe the streamer hype about it being OP do some research on how well the streamers do on average with this ship and compare it to the other ships they own and do yourself a favor and think for yourself or better still get one and see there is alot more to it then left clicking. What everyone hates is the HE spam its not alone in that company. Streamers want good games and they get focused alot so never going to be in favor of another good HE spammer. Yet you see them sail around in the borgoune and make no apologies in using the most OP ship in the game to get more viewers. Like i said do your research.
The reality of the game is slowly dribbling away down the drain, just my humble opinion. It's nice to see someone tell it like it is with no arse licking 👍👍👍
@David Robinson, this HE spam capability is very realistic, as these weapons were set to spam rounds like this. The Colbert's RoF is supposed to be the Atlanta/Flint's RoF at t7. It's the fire/HE spam mechanics that need addressment. I'm, people keep thinking WoWs is supposed to be some master and commander video game. 20th century naval warfare was extremely complex and beyond the scope of tanks or planes.
I'm more than aware the capabilities of modern navel firepower and if I wanted to play Napolianic/Nelson era games then they are out there but not only are Wargaming inventing ships they are giving them 1960s/70's firepower and allocating them to nations that even at the end of WWll they did not possess the technology to produce, they then nerf perfectly fine ships from some of the advanced navies best ships ignoring the fact that some armour construction tech was years ahead of others and did not have to be as thick and yet gave even more protection. Some of the designs of certain ships being nothing more than far fetched scribblings supposedly recovered from archives, Yes bring in more modern ships I'm all for that the Friesland is a Cold War era ship but putting such ships against 1920's ships in the game bares no reality whatsoever hence my comment.
Holy shit thats so fucking fun and interactive to play against that cancer. It's almost like I can do sometihn in Yamato with 24s reload and even if i hit its often overpens
what surprises me is the Colbert is harder to obtain than the Smolinsk,, A person needs to research a tech tree line 5 times before obtaining enough tokens to purchase Colbert, Smolinsk is a wopping 244.000 coal. With the bonuses a person can earn in the Italian missions and Halloween specials and cupon, earning the coal seems a little bit easier. When comparing the two ships, Smolinsk seems to be the ship to go for if you like this type of game play. Be warned though, the Freisland can not hold it's own against any of these two ships, the Friesland is afterbirth geew that has little value after a few times of playing, Friesland is not worth the effort or money, getting sunk in her is a regular thing unless you island hump a lot. If a person really wants a ship like these,, research the British cruiser line to get the Minotaur. Mino has 10k torps, top speed is 36 knots, main reload is almost as fast as the others and it has a great heal, pack that together with the smoke and you have the making of a dangerous ship.
I was away from the game for awhile. Came in with a couple bb’s. Met the Smolensk and Colbert, decided fuck that. Began playing my dd’s, cv rework makes them crazy easy for cv’s to hunt. Now I just cry.
So Smolensks is the new unit of how disgustingly overpowered a ship is... 1 Smolensks... 0.1 Smolensks... 0.5 Smolensks... yeah... i like the sound of that...
So why ihfe? It only allows to bow / stern pen some t10 crusiser and has no effect on bbs... hitting fast moving cruisers in those specific areas is challenging and most of the dmg done came from bb fire and superstrucure dmg.
Top 2 enemy? Smolensk and Kleber. Plus you in Colbert. These sorts of ships and battles are everything I dislike about WG. Take a promising title and then increasingly make it stupid with ever more ridiculous mechanics and ships. It's hard to understand why any navy built BBs when you see the performance of these things and 'gunboat' DDs.
WG finally made me quit the game. I hung on in the hopes it would get better. Then the carrier rework trainwreck came around (if you like it, good, but I hated it) and they are doubling down on HE spam and bad meta proliferation. I realized this since I haven't had the urge to play in over 6 months, and each news I hear only reinforced the fact that I don't want to play the game anymore. I'd play again if we got HE under control and have classic Carriers back, but that's not coming back and WG loves HE. Thanks for still making vids Flamu, your channel is honest and I love to take my news from it !
Did he say, "no skill at all required to succeed?" They finally made a Russian cruiser for me. Is Smolensk the Russian word for potato? Corned beef, eggs and smolensks for breakfast tomorrow.
This is why I don't play these ships. I have a Colbert and a Smolensk, and I've used both maybe two or three times since their release. They're dumb ships for dumb players, and I don't feel like I'm even really playing when I helm them.
Those gun loaders must be wore out after loading those shells as fast as they do. I doubt in reality no one could load guns that fast. I agree this ship is disgusting, to me it's more OP than the Smolensk.
One thing why i dont care about tier 10 in world of warships now is that there are too many "special" ships there and most of them are clearly OP or simply better then standard ship in the line. And also 2019 and maybe 2020 will be year of CVs, spem crusirs, sniping soviet BBs, camping BBs and no DDs.
On the asshole scale I'd rate the Colbert as roughly 0.8 Smolensks, or almost 0.5 Carriers.
Insta: instagram.com/flamugram/
Stream: www.twitch.tv/flamuu
Twitter: twitter.com/flamuchz
Discord: discord.gg/Flamu
Flamu no homo but you are a handsome man
I play smolensk because on the asshole scale it rates as 1.5 smolensk, and if I have learned anything from spaceballs it is that you cannot escape the assholes.
misery index: 1.0 smolensks
Against those kind of cruisers there is the Alaska. Swat the fucker out of the water and that's it.
Hey there 😍 You're so gorgeous❤️ .You are exactly what we are looking for our brand.Dm us for collab 😘❤️
two videos in the same week
Get this imposter out of here
its already 3 videos this week :D
#blamefatso
Yamato: *extinguishes a single fire
Colbert: "Am I a joke to you?"
@Zbriu Just aim better. Yama AP is brutal against almost everything and that hasn't changed.
he didn't though, Flamu set 2 fires on him
@Zbriu Regardless, I still don't believe you. Yamato is still a beast and if not for the Kremlin, the best t10 BB as well. You probably play it too close? And you can't really see if your aim is bad if it is so all the time.
@Zbriu I think it depends hard on RNG. Had a 250k battle in my Yamato with Yamamoto yesterday . Got kraken and it was just brutal.
But sometimes I struggle to get even 100k because everything overpens, even bbs showing full broadside just overpen.
@@Anldiot69 I have only had a few 200k+ matches, the rest are about 80k on average. I consider a 130k game to be really good. I also use the legendary mod but it still shoots like crap. Aiming a little high or low to compensate for turns still does not help. Nothing does. I agree that the yami USED TO BE the best, but now it is the worst. It really pisses me off because it was my first t10 ship and it took me a long time to get it.
5:00 witherer.
At five minutes into the game.
He got wither before his team got first blood. Yeah, wither was the first achievement in this game.
I've gotten Witherer 5 minutes in with my Zao before. It's all about starting fires and getting lucky.
@@sorrynotsorry8224 Not to forget the stupidity of teh enemy in some games. I mean u can also get 2 dev strikes in 5 mins if you get lucky and the enemy plays braindead.
Ive seen many smolensks get witherer 5 mins in :>
My best is 7 minutes, combo of flooding and fire in my Ibuki
WG sees this - "Buff Smolensk"
Radar and 50mm armor is needed
510mm shells aswell
100% fire Chance ignoring all reductions and zones
While at it, how about guns that shoot up and then the shell does 90 deg turn so flight time to 20km is just 20s or so
@@derewe2094 still not enough.
Why not add some KH-22 missle launchers. Thats balance.
@@SadMarinersFan R36M2 ICBM Launchers (12 per ship) on new 1km Concealment dd?
Can be launched after 10s from game start, do 200k dmg each regardless off class, apply 4 fires to every ship in 10km radius of impact, 100% hit probability
I think that does it?
Thats the "I win" - card
Imagine wargaming gives Des Moines a buff that decreases reload speed to 3s and damage to 6k per shell in AP :)
I like how Flamu starts talking softer as he begins to stalk that Salem. He senses that his prey is near and doesn't want to spook it.
LMAO
Italian cruisers: could I maybe borrow some of your HE shel--
Colbert: NO!
*looking at smolensk
Smolensk: I thought I already sent you to gulag.
Can you explain which ship is looking at smolensk?
@@olsenfernandes3634 the Italian cruisers are
@@trebletrouble1348 Thanks, XD
@@olsenfernandes3634 no problem but personally I dont see why the italian cruiser wants to borrow he shells of a completely different calibre since all Italians use 6inch or 8 inch shells but colbert and smolensk use 5 inch and 5.1 inch shells lol
@@trebletrouble1348 Really gotta ruin the joke don't you....
Another plus point for the Colbert over the Smolensk: the Colbert actually existed (instead of coming from the infamous Sekrit Dokuments).
I only average 160k in Colbert, very balanced indeed
Good to have you back on UA-cam Flamu. You have been dearly missed sir. Much love from England
Such a nice helipad on the back of that boat...really helps it blend into the current WW2 meta lol
...cant wait for the Ticonderoga class to enter the game now
Arleigh Burke class DD soon
Not like this is the first 1950s ship in World of Warships.
@@RedXlV You dead right!...I was surprised to learn that she had a helipad in her designs as early as 1953! (She looks like a 60-70s crusier compared to the rest lol)
07
Well, the helicopter was invented by the time of ww2
willytheekid Why do people keep thinking this is supposed to be a WW2 game? Don’t think WG ever said explicitly that WOWS is WW2.
Yeah, that Shima got brutalized. You've been spending time with Jingles, haven't you? ;)
Cruelty to underaged botes... cover your eyes kids!
Well, after watching this vid, it's very clear that the long awaited Smolensk buff is just around the corner.
"i'm guessing he didn't see that shimakaze earlier"
very interesting looking shimakaze he was shooting at, did i stumble onto a jingles video by accident?
:D I think he meant the other "slender" Japanese T10 "destroyer" shown at 3:40.
WG: some light cruisers are overperforming with HE, so we are looking at nerfing IFHE across the board for balancing purposes.
WG: let's add Smolensk & Colbert with outrageous HE DPM & fire chances, that is balanced.
P.S. Proposed IFHE nerfs would not apply to the small caliber "DD guns" on Smolensk & Colbert. That is for more "balancing".
Thing is since Smolensk and Colbert are no premium ships bought for cash they can be changed. Which is good imo. If it will happen - who knows.
Maaan, how can I blame my bbs sitting and sniping from spawn now?!
I can atone to many BBs staying the hell away from early and even mid-game engagements at higher tiers. I mean I tried to push a cap and guess what was behind an island? A smolensk and a colbert. Together.
My Kurfurst has seen better days...
@@BPKPhoenix that's why we need CVs.
....I'm gonna assume you're joking because you're smoking.
@@qwertyytrewq1086 but cvs target slow ships not AA cruisers
@@trevor7873 their AA does 0 damage if you come with bombers/torpedos cross the island. I mean it starts shooting very close range so no flakes. Drop and go base
- loses rudder & engine all time
- no armor
- good traverse & reload
- French
... so basically a DeGrasse after eating some mushrooms.
Quite literally so. In real life, De Grasse and Colbert were sister ships.
@@RedXlV No reload booster though XD
I have the Bayard, it feels the same lol, just less dmg output
Thanks for this Colbert Report.
I remember starting playing this game in 2017 and when looking through the forums for advice, I only saw people rambling how the Khaba was all damage, no teamplay. 2 years later and Im left scratching my head.
Three things I feel need to be said:
1: This ships anthem should be Firestarter by The Prodigy
2: With the number of shells all I could think of is the quote from 300: Persians: "We shall fire so many arrows we will blot out the sun" Spartans: "Then we shall fight in the shade"
3: When are you going to get a 1000 hits with shells? I've seen you get so close so many times, but yet I wait.
I feel like a good anthem would also be Burn MF by Five Finger Death Punch.
@@rock_man Maybe Ring of Fire by Johnny Cash?
And Kreml says: than we will be fighting in the shades
@@Schnittertm1 I just feel like Burn MF is better to represent the intensity due to the fact it's heavy metal.
I toured the ship when he was in Bordeaux, France, before he was destroyed, such an awesome piece of history ! After that I decided to help a local association by becoming a tourist guide aboard the DD Maillé Brézé in Nantes (which is also an awesome piece of history ! ) :)
Smolensk Captain: "CYKA BLYAT!!! COLBERT TOO STRONK!!! WG, NERF COLBERT!!! BUFF SMOLENSK!!! BLYAT!!!"
Nice to have you back on UA-cam
Why was that so satisfying watching him completely wreck the Smolensk at the end
Smolensk gets out DPMed
*Wait, that's illegal*
Flamu: "Colbert is a dumb ship. Not as dumb as Smolensk, but dumb nonetheless."
Also Flamu: Does 31400 damage
"Throw enough shit at the wall, some of its going to stick."
_They took that to the next level..._
The thumbnail of the video is a meme pic instead of in-game footage
what a rare sight!
I’ve been driving the Colbert for a while. I have to say it’s like break dancing and tango when in the open.
WG with all the nice and fun additions to the game that definetly do not give you cancer
Hey please continue to add tips (like you did for pinging for DDs) it's simple stuff but theres always someone out there that hasn't thought of it.
Loving these videos Flamu. Btw, can you make a similar video about map positioning but with BBs and CVs? The choice of BBs and CVs are completely up to you though. Other than that, keep it up!
Flamu: This ship is cancer, but have you heard of the Cherobly radiation inducing cancer called the Smolensk?
Good video.
Flamu, you're not a bad looking bloke are you! Totally different to how I'd imagined, but I suppose everybody has said that.
and WG did not what the minotaur to have HE due its rate of fire, but lets give the baguette's an op fire starter
they release beauties like this one and the smolensk.
then soon hopefully the pobeda which will be their direct counter because it can blap them instantly from yamato-like ranges...so everyone will want one.
and we shall call this 'world of warships - next Gen madness'
/sarcasm off
There should be a mod that allows you to hear Dio screaming "MUDA MUDA MUDA" whenever you open fire with ships with crazy rate of fire like Colbert, Smolensk, Harugumo, and so on.
That would make ships like these more tolerable :D
Something that should be noted is that the Colbert is just fat enough to catch BB AP citadels whereas the Smolensk quite reliably gets overpenned. Really the only times I've ever citadeled a Smolensk in a BB is if it was angled just enough to give me the maximum volume of citadel hitbox without being at an autobounce angle, or if I aimed low to use the water slowing down the shell. Naturally neither of those two instance are something I'd say is a reliable approach (angle just a bit more and the shells just bounce and aiming low always comes with a good chance of dispersion putting the shells a bit too early in the water where they just splash harmlessly). With the Colbert, no such problems.
While I'd never let myself buy a Smolensk, I'm actually willing to do the grind for a Colbert. It's a lot more work for a worse ship, but I'd rather have something that actually has some risks to using it. Smolensk just doesn't have any risks.
it's a better ship, by a lot. Considering you know how to handle it.
Smolensk has no risks shows how much you know. Everyone that owns a smolensk has never been killed or blapped. If you want to be invincible get a smolensk. Dont believe the streamer hype about it being OP do some research on how well the streamers do on average with this ship and compare it to the other ships they own and do yourself a favor and think for yourself or better still get one and see there is alot more to it then left clicking. What everyone hates is the HE spam its not alone in that company. Streamers want good games and they get focused alot so never going to be in favor of another good HE spammer. Yet you see them sail around in the borgoune and make no apologies in using the most OP ship in the game to get more viewers. Like i said do your research.
Thank you Flamu from Borneo Island, Malaysia.
👑
people always raging about Smolensk, maybe because they still haven't met Colbert, especially when she hug an island
Finaly a Colbert vid!
It’s like painting the sky yellow
The reality of the game is slowly dribbling away down the drain, just my humble opinion. It's nice to see someone tell it like it is with no arse licking 👍👍👍
@David Robinson, this HE spam capability is very realistic, as these weapons were set to spam rounds like this. The Colbert's RoF is supposed to be the Atlanta/Flint's RoF at t7. It's the fire/HE spam mechanics that need addressment.
I'm, people keep thinking WoWs is supposed to be some master and commander video game. 20th century naval warfare was extremely complex and beyond the scope of tanks or planes.
I'm more than aware the capabilities of modern navel firepower and if I wanted to play Napolianic/Nelson era games then they are out there but not only are Wargaming inventing ships they are giving them 1960s/70's firepower and allocating them to nations that even at the end of WWll they did not possess the technology to produce, they then nerf perfectly fine ships from some of the advanced navies best ships ignoring the fact that some armour construction tech was years ahead of others and did not have to be as thick and yet gave even more protection. Some of the designs of certain ships being nothing more than far fetched scribblings supposedly recovered from archives, Yes bring in more modern ships I'm all for that the Friesland is a Cold War era ship but putting such ships against 1920's ships in the game bares no reality whatsoever hence my comment.
the Yamato basically gave himself up for free 100k dmg, but the rest of the fight does show this ships strength
if this was real, they would have more replacements for the gun barrels than people aboard the ship
EDIT: it's a real ship and i have no words
That rain of fire at 2:00 is just scary
Holy shit thats so fucking fun and interactive to play against that cancer. It's almost like I can do sometihn in Yamato with 24s reload and even if i hit its often overpens
Basically... If you can play Atlanta properly, you can also play Colbert properly.
what surprises me is the Colbert is harder to obtain than the Smolinsk,, A person needs to research a tech tree line 5 times before obtaining enough tokens to purchase Colbert, Smolinsk is a wopping 244.000 coal. With the bonuses a person can earn in the Italian missions and Halloween specials and cupon, earning the coal seems a little bit easier. When comparing the two ships, Smolinsk seems to be the ship to go for if you like this type of game play. Be warned though, the Freisland can not hold it's own against any of these two ships, the Friesland is afterbirth geew that has little value after a few times of playing, Friesland is not worth the effort or money, getting sunk in her is a regular thing unless you island hump a lot. If a person really wants a ship like these,, research the British cruiser line to get the Minotaur. Mino has 10k torps, top speed is 36 knots, main reload is almost as fast as the others and it has a great heal, pack that together with the smoke and you have the making of a dangerous ship.
Averaging 0.79 hits per second for the whole game which is nuts considering the amount of time spent not firing.
what is it ? a fireworks machine , nothing more , and I should reset my ship line for this ???
Watch WG bring back kitakami, but as tier 10, buffed, and as NTC ship
Man do I have bad news
Why did you have to say something
Flamu. Can we get a new Worcester vid?
Colbert works very well as an open water spammer too
is it ok to think that Colbert is a T10 Bayard. Both look like having the same trhenght and wickness?
I was away from the game for awhile. Came in with a couple bb’s. Met the Smolensk and Colbert, decided fuck that. Began playing my dd’s, cv rework makes them crazy easy for cv’s to hunt. Now I just cry.
So Smolensks is the new unit of how disgustingly overpowered a ship is...
1 Smolensks...
0.1 Smolensks...
0.5 Smolensks...
yeah... i like the sound of that...
Atlanta times Minotaur minus p2w Smolensk torps
I call the Colbert the "Golden Shower".
I saw UA-cam and tried it on the European server. Then he said he'd report to the war gaming. What do you think about this?
Hello Mr flamu. is IFHE still a good idea on the Colbert in 2022?
So why ihfe? It only allows to bow / stern pen some t10 crusiser and has no effect on bbs... hitting fast moving cruisers in those specific areas is challenging and most of the dmg done came from bb fire and superstrucure dmg.
Nice video guy. Saudações do Brasil.
Top 2 enemy? Smolensk and Kleber. Plus you in Colbert.
These sorts of ships and battles are everything I dislike about WG. Take a promising title and then increasingly make it stupid with ever more ridiculous mechanics and ships.
It's hard to understand why any navy built BBs when you see the performance of these things and 'gunboat' DDs.
Wellp, guess ima put my german BB's away again....
Flamuu is posting on yt again ... hype
More reasonsnot to play anything beyond tier 7. Well done, WG. And gfys, WG.
Holy crap, you can get all 16 barrels if you're sufficiently far away and broadside to the target.
Oh wait... *distant russian noises*
Nothing like being able to walk your rounds onto your target like its a god damn machine gun.
WG finally made me quit the game. I hung on in the hopes it would get better.
Then the carrier rework trainwreck came around (if you like it, good, but I hated it) and they are doubling down on HE spam and bad meta proliferation.
I realized this since I haven't had the urge to play in over 6 months, and each news I hear only reinforced the fact that I don't want to play the game anymore.
I'd play again if we got HE under control and have classic Carriers back, but that's not coming back and WG loves HE.
Thanks for still making vids Flamu, your channel is honest and I love to take my news from it !
We be memeing now!
Jebus, this kind of shit is why i stopped playing Wows, still enjoy the videos tho and it was nice to see a Smolensk get balanced. GG flamu.
But is it a better fire starter than the Kekquerer?
Could you make a video about playing GK on current Fire spam meta!?
Good to know. Although, which would you pick first this one or Ohio?
Ohio
Ohio, the Colbert depends on favourable maps, positions and teammates too much. Also the gameplay feels braindead.
need to clean myself after watching this
Hi guys, can I just ask, is this ship available only for a limited time? I'm from Asia server and I can't seem to find this ship anywhere on the game.
It’s in the research bureau, you unlock the research bureau buy researching 5 tier 10 ships
Flamu why you’re playing with def AA? Sonar is better imho especially when someone gives you smoke and torps can get you.
Really dont know why i should stay playing wows. All those freaks who enjoy these game breaking ships.
i just dropped down to tier 6 .....then you get a sensible game
my games usually in the first 5-6 minutes involve little to no dmg done and 1-2 million dmg dodged
The best would have been if the Smolensk at the end began to complain about your HE spam ;P
So it's basically a Tier 10 Atlanta minus torps.
Im too lazy too look back in the video, what's the DPM on this compared to the Des Moines
So this is an Atlanta with heal?
13:12 you cannot do this with Smolensk! No smoke and no torps but is ++more power than Smolensk
Spreadsheet says you're having fun
Sry no smart comment this vid from me.
I am on fire today but I am a BB. It lowers my enthusiasm ...
Speaking of Pobeda are there any updates on it ?
Did he say, "no skill at all required to succeed?" They finally made a Russian cruiser for me. Is Smolensk the Russian word for potato? Corned beef, eggs and smolensks for breakfast tomorrow.
Its okay everyone, Soon we have soviet BBs with this reload too
Burn song intensifies
Ironic, after 9 months it's already powercrept. Now is considered bad considering how expensive it is. Can't pen 30mm even with ifhe and squishy af.
This is why I don't play these ships. I have a Colbert and a Smolensk, and I've used both maybe two or three times since their release. They're dumb ships for dumb players, and I don't feel like I'm even really playing when I helm them.
Dude...axaxaxaxa!!!
You just start play WoWs and your maximum Tier is V!!! xD
@@svenska.våktare What? I started 3 years ago.
Those gun loaders must be wore out after loading those shells as fast as they do. I doubt in reality no one could load guns that fast. I agree this ship is disgusting, to me it's more OP than the Smolensk.
One thing why i dont care about tier 10 in world of warships now is that there are too many "special" ships there and most of them are clearly OP or simply better then standard ship in the line. And also 2019 and maybe 2020 will be year of CVs, spem crusirs, sniping soviet BBs, camping BBs and no DDs.
Colbert AP DPM is disgusting. I spammed AP on broadside Yamato from 15km. Got 1-2K per 2 shells and it racks up very fast
Coop with Void next :P
4:52 Flamu did you just say 900000 dpm? what? exuse me?