[Dealer Film] The 1960 TRUCK Shootout, Chevy blows out the competition but its UGLY...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 87

  • @Hugo90again
    @Hugo90again 10 місяців тому +7

    These '60-'66 Chevrolets are still hugely popular and an amazing number of them are still on the road.

    • @humbertogarcia3503
      @humbertogarcia3503 6 місяців тому

      Fue su rediseño y cambios en suspensión de las dos partes que mejoro su fiabilidad, por siguen en circulación.

  • @Helmholtzwatson1984
    @Helmholtzwatson1984 7 місяців тому +4

    I cant believe people think that hood is ugly. Blows my mind. Its fricken classic and has a really neat aesthetic.

    • @vm722
      @vm722 6 місяців тому +1

      I Agree ❤👍

  • @jw77019
    @jw77019 Рік тому +5

    When I was a kid it was hilarious to see a woman driving a pickup truck. It just was not done by ladies. We actually laughed at it. They were very rough riding without power steering, power brakes, nor air conditioning until the late 60’s and early 70’s. Most of them were 6 cylinder too. I remember the first v8 Chevy truck I ever saw about 1968.

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  Рік тому +1

      Yeah manual steering, usually steel floor or rubber mat if you lucky, lot of bouncing normally, a brutal clutch... Certainly not luxury rides :)

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 11 місяців тому +1

      It was unusual in the city, but in rural areas, it was not so strange. Most cars of that era didn't have power steering, power brakes, or AC either. But they did have a nice smooth ride.

  • @sterlinsilver
    @sterlinsilver Рік тому +20

    I honestly love the look of the Chevy truck. I know nobody else does but it's just so unusual

    • @nlpnt
      @nlpnt Рік тому

      Me too. That windshield sure did date fast, so much they ended up expensively redesigning it mid-cycle.

    • @redtra236
      @redtra236 Рік тому

      I never understood the big fin looking things on the front, they did away with them after a couple years while keeping most other parts of the body the same or similar

    • @mikeweizer3149
      @mikeweizer3149 Рік тому +2

      ​@@redtra236I actually like the look of both the 60-66Chevrolet and harder to find GMCS!!!!. I grew up looking at that generation of trucks!!!!.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Рік тому

      @@nlpnt They only re-did the cowl and the door uppers. The rest seems the same.

    • @nlpnt
      @nlpnt Рік тому

      @@jamesbosworth4191 That is one of the most expensive body panels to change, which is why it's normally only done on full redesigns and so many distantly-related cars built on the same platform have interchangeable windshields.

  • @malcolmhamilton5200
    @malcolmhamilton5200 Рік тому +13

    I remember these trucks when they were new and they looked rough after just a few years and they were butt ugly right out of the showroom. People didn't start driving pickups as personal vehicles, instead of cars until well into the 70s. Believe me you would NOT want to be picking up your date in one of these trucks back then. Looks only a mother could love.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 11 місяців тому +1

      Beats taking the bus!

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 10 місяців тому

      @jeanclaude7018I don't think they still do, but maybe they want to buy it back?

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 10 місяців тому +1

      @jeanclaude7018 I love my Squarebody. If you have them rust-proofed, they are great trucks. They do everything a truck is supposed to do, and have a nice interior as well, and they are easy to work on. NO DAMN COMPUTERS! And yes, today's Japanoid and Japanese vehicles are truly ugly. They look like the faces of the Hurman/Unger cartoons that used to be in the paper.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 10 місяців тому

      @jeanclaude7018"Squarebody" refers to Chevy and GMCs from 1973 - 87, with some 88 - 91s as well. F150s are Fords.

  • @louislepage5111
    @louislepage5111 Рік тому +6

    This is when trucks were TRUCKS .😊

  • @philojudaeusofalexandria9556
    @philojudaeusofalexandria9556 9 місяців тому +2

    Wait... a wood pickup bed is better than steel?

  • @jamesbosworth4191
    @jamesbosworth4191 Рік тому +7

    I have always liked the 60 - 61 Chevy's, (and GMC) looks, and I knew they were all new and were bigger. I always figured, though, that it's rear coil springs were a liability, (the GMC stuck with rear leaf springs), but it actually has a higher load capacity. Would be curious to see how the other makes compare from THEIR OWN points of view. It does look like the Chevy wins hands down.

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 Рік тому

      Their transmission was junk on Chevy and GMC trucks.

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 Рік тому +1

      When do you go to the Dodge and International trucks?

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Рік тому +1

      @@glennso47 Their standard transmissions, not surprised, as, at least in the Chevy, was pretty much the same unit Chevrolet cars used since the 40s, and it was not exceptionally rugged even then, but the GMC continued with the 4 speed Hydramatic for automatic trans, but Chevy used it's 2 speed Powerglide.

  • @timblaes7028
    @timblaes7028 Рік тому +5

    They pick and choose, the specs.
    A little different here and there didn't really matter.
    Looks and/or loyalty to brand was the final decision, unless there was a big price gap..

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  Рік тому

      After you watch that how can you say Chevy didnt every number on all aspects???!! :)

  • @greglechowski5030
    @greglechowski5030 Рік тому +12

    They sure did ignore the Dodge V8 engines didn’t they.

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  Рік тому +3

      shhh :) only talk up the strong Chevy points :)

    • @randallsullivan3692
      @randallsullivan3692 Рік тому +3

      And the IHC six cylinder!!!

    • @rayfridley6649
      @rayfridley6649 11 місяців тому +2

      On the Dodge, transmission options have been ignored. On the IH, automatic transmission options are also ignored.

    • @gearyheidinewaccount3237
      @gearyheidinewaccount3237 5 місяців тому

      They were too ugly

    • @bobburges3654
      @bobburges3654 Місяць тому

      That's because no one liked the poor quality ugly Dodge.

  • @gcfifthgear
    @gcfifthgear Рік тому +4

    Of the four 1960 models, only Chevy was all-new. But 1961 brought new designs for Ford, Dodge and IHC. Of those three, Ford looked better, IHC looked better, but Dodge was plug-ugly! Not to mention that Chevy's design was improved in 1962 and 1964, while Ford was pretty much the same through 1966 (except for the unibody, which was phased out by 1964. Dodge finally made its front end more attractive by 1965, but none of them were attractive enough to win any beauty contests back then....

    • @jamescooley5744
      @jamescooley5744 Рік тому

      Ford brought out the one hand tailgate latch in 1964….Chevy still had the double chain latches on the tailgate until the all-new 1967s.

    • @jamescooley5744
      @jamescooley5744 Рік тому +2

      Yet Dodge Trucks had the same body style from 1961-1971. Chrysler was more interested in updating its cars than its trucks.

    • @gearyheidinewaccount3237
      @gearyheidinewaccount3237 5 місяців тому +1

      The Ford was but ugly

  • @michaelK3148
    @michaelK3148 Рік тому +1

    Back when the “technology” package was the optional AM radio for $20.

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  Рік тому

      Radios were expensive, prob more like 30 :)

    • @humbertogarcia3503
      @humbertogarcia3503 6 місяців тому

      Es que el F.M. no era tan comercial y había pocas estaciones. Sin embargo ya había F.m.

  • @sblsbl7600
    @sblsbl7600 Рік тому +4

    The 60 and 61 Chevrolet are my all time favorite pickup for looks.

  • @bigcrowfly
    @bigcrowfly Рік тому +8

    🛻They left out the 1960 Studebaker in the comparison. 🛻 Talk about a vehicle with wierd styling.🛻

    • @LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv
      @LeopoldoNotarianni-rk9vv Рік тому

      Granted the Studebaker Lark type pick up was a worthy competitor

    • @danielsimmons7397
      @danielsimmons7397 11 місяців тому

      I was wondering about that myself, I've always liked the Champ pickup!

  • @carlmontney7916
    @carlmontney7916 Рік тому +3

    After watching this and it's obvious comparisons of mere inches between models . Can we as men believe women when they say size doesn't matter?

  • @mikeweizer3149
    @mikeweizer3149 Рік тому +1

    Would there be much difference between the new1960 Chevrolet light duty trucks and GMCs light dutys I know that the V6 was exclusive to GMC But that wasn't the olny engine that GMC had in their arsenal

  • @stevehowe5601
    @stevehowe5601 Рік тому +2

    Funny that the Chevy 348 was always called a truck motor but apparently
    Wasn’t used in trucks

    • @andreamills5852
      @andreamills5852 Рік тому +3

      348 and 409 were used in the larger trucks and schools buses.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Рік тому +2

      Bigger trucks, not pickups.

    • @humbertogarcia3503
      @humbertogarcia3503 6 місяців тому

      ​@@andreamills5852El 348, un antecedente del 350 Small Block. Ofrecido desde 1969.

  • @markscungio2996
    @markscungio2996 Рік тому +2

    These presentations were made by all manufacturers of cars and trucks from the 1920s thru early 2000s. Records ans slides are used here, with a "beep" sound or similar to tell someone to switch to the next image. These were created as a simple means to educate a salesman, and give them 3 or 4 items in each area...vo.fort, power, economy, value, styling, handling...with a small book to put in one's pocket as a reference. One was supposed to memorize and familiarize themselves with their advantages compared to the competition. The idea being to listen and ask a prospect...what do you look for in a truck? If they say, comfort- I drive 12 hous a day...then roomy seats, big windows, sun visors, good wipers, heater, radio...followed by how strong economical engines using big tires and brakes made for easier driving less fatigue at days end...OR point out whatever the customer seems to care about the most...that's how we sold then.

  • @08Barclay
    @08Barclay Рік тому +3

    Anything but ugly, in my opinion.
    In my youth, I drove a 1960 Chevy flat deck a bit, it was a workhorse, but I thought it was a great looking truck. 😎👍🏻

  • @alanmaier
    @alanmaier Рік тому +2

    These differences were so trivial - drive each and buy the one you like best.

  • @65merc390
    @65merc390 Рік тому +7

    for all the hype chevy is boasting about glass area to the ford...they seemed to skip over that the ford had a larger rear window ...i'll take the ford

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  Рік тому +1

      its all about the GLASS AREA :)

    • @vm722
      @vm722 6 місяців тому

      Bigger back window?
      For your rear eyeballs?😂🤣🤣
      Or maybe you prefer a suntan on your neck?
      Maybe possibly you love to show the drivers behind you U neck?
      Why would you want that?

  • @THROTTLEPOWER
    @THROTTLEPOWER Рік тому +2

    Very cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 👍👍

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  Рік тому +1

      Yeah I thought so also, they were starting to push the trucks :)

  • @chrisbrown3925
    @chrisbrown3925 Рік тому +7

    I guess dodges V8s make more power and torque compared to chevrolet...

  • @AryDontSurf
    @AryDontSurf Рік тому +1

    ❤❤❤

  • @toddbrooks2464
    @toddbrooks2464 Рік тому

    Stylists & Ceo's had to be on mind altering drugs in that era, cars & trucks...

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  Рік тому

      yeah I got to agree... I like some radical styling though, the Dodge was proabably the tamest... Ford and Chevy were like wtf... 61 would tone them down pretty quick.. I like the 61 Chevy better

  • @tede.kulhawik7614
    @tede.kulhawik7614 Рік тому +3

    The fords and chevys were cool looking with the foreward leaning cabs and those huge hoods, but unfortunately the chevys was impossible to see over and the new suspensions sucked and proved short lived. Ford caught up in sucking with the 61 unit cab and box.

    • @vm722
      @vm722 6 місяців тому +1

      Why do you feel that the torsion bar suspension sucked?
      If you look at the history they are using torsion bar suspension on many vehicles till today.
      in 1963 chevy had to drop the torsion bar suspension and go with the spring front suspension. Because I believe Cadillac had the patent.
      Many people are completely satisfied with the torsion bar suspension and believe that it is superior.

  • @justintang2294
    @justintang2294 4 місяці тому +1

    No, the modern Silverado "light trucks" with their giant size are the ugliest...and the most dangerous around bicyclists and small children.
    On the other hand the Ford is actually the best looking of the four.

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  4 місяці тому

      Modern trucks are just a front grill pissing match now :) who can make it the biggest and nastiest.

  • @Richard4point6
    @Richard4point6 Рік тому

    I always thought that the late 50s and early 60s were UGLY!

  • @fubarmodelyard1392
    @fubarmodelyard1392 10 місяців тому

    Wood rots. The dodge looks better too

  • @lars277
    @lars277 Рік тому

    1960 has to be one of the ugliest years ever for pickups. Esp the Chevy.

    • @autochronicles8667
      @autochronicles8667  11 місяців тому

      yeah i would agree... hard to think of a strangest year.

    • @justintang2294
      @justintang2294 4 місяці тому

      I still like the Ford. In fact the 1957-60 model years all looked good in my opinion.

    • @bobburges3654
      @bobburges3654 Місяць тому

      ​@@vm722 She doesn't.