One minister, two ideas - Yes, Minister - BBC

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 311

  • @williamdrijver4141
    @williamdrijver4141 Рік тому +345

    John Nettleton passed away on July 12th 2023, age 94. Marvelous actor, and brilliant casting for his role as Sir Arnold Robinson.

    • @Blackcomanche
      @Blackcomanche Рік тому +9

      May he rest in peace...

    • @shezh9597
      @shezh9597 Рік тому +7

      im actually quite saddened to hear this, may he indeed rest in peace.

    • @gregcarson8422
      @gregcarson8422 Рік тому +5

      ValeJohn Nettleton, you were indeed a fine actor and fulfilled brilliantly your role as Sir Arnold. RIP John

    • @malcolmabram2957
      @malcolmabram2957 Рік тому +7

      He had no trouble getting past Peter at the pearly gates.

    • @Noobsaibot21
      @Noobsaibot21 6 місяців тому

      That's an impressive final score. Probably my favourite secondary character in the show - RIP Sir Arnold

  • @robertwebb5648
    @robertwebb5648 Рік тому +103

    God, just the way, Arnold looks off into the distance when he delivers his 'minister with 2 ideas' comment as if he's trying to recall some half-remembered joke. Brilliant!!

  • @jedoka
    @jedoka Рік тому +88

    RIP John Nettleton - aka Sir Arnold - a great portrayal of a senior civil servant!

  • @iandhr1
    @iandhr1 9 років тому +388

    "A minister with two ideas?" wonderful

  • @quintuscrinis
    @quintuscrinis 3 роки тому +179

    "A minister with two ideas, I can't remember when we last had one of those" - given the stalling tactics, I'm guessing it has been a very long time since one was allowed to express a second idea.

    • @MrRedcarpet02
      @MrRedcarpet02 9 місяців тому +7

      Just copy from the opposition, or your own party when last in government. A persistent pattern. Or from a 'think tank' secretly allied with your party

  • @YD-uq5fi
    @YD-uq5fi 8 років тому +881

    Sir Arnold is the only person who is *always* in control.....

    • @benschmidt3967
      @benschmidt3967 7 років тому +32

      always the men 'behind the curtains' dictating policy...
      they whinge about the secret government too much.
      two ideas they may give the public a idea the public
      service is too hard working...pun.
      I thought he was going for a sarcastic quip-
      2 ideas- you sure the next idea- actually works
      or its just there to impress officials and the media.

    • @mscott3918
      @mscott3918 6 років тому

      It is always that way

    • @ahcokris
      @ahcokris 6 років тому +28

      Until sir humphrey takes over as cabinet secretary =) then he's the one who's in control. They're very much a like.

    • @szylaj
      @szylaj 5 років тому +8

      yes, hes russian spy...

    • @deepblue64
      @deepblue64 5 років тому +8

      He has the wisdom that nothing realy changes.

  • @herseem
    @herseem 5 років тому +770

    Many comedies become old quickly as culture moves on. It just seems that 'Yes, Minister', and 'Yes, Prime Minister' improve with age like a good brandy as they were largely about fundamentals rather than superficial matters and therefore remain perpetually relevant

    • @gifgit
      @gifgit 4 роки тому +39

      I agree, when it was first screened we just had a vague idea of how the government worked, in recent years this comedy classic has become more of a documentary on how exactly the Westminster establishment behaves.

    • @dipanjan2207
      @dipanjan2207 4 роки тому +25

      Being a beaurocrat I can assure there's much truth in it and one can jolly well learn something.

    • @dvolkov76
      @dvolkov76 4 роки тому +19

      It's a comedy?! I thoght it was documentary....

    • @michaeltreleaven3486
      @michaeltreleaven3486 4 роки тому +13

      These episodes will be eternal, not only because they hit home, but because they so well mock our all too human vaniety. Perhaps only a country that could bring on Shakespeare could do this.

    • @SolarWebsite
      @SolarWebsite 4 роки тому +10

      I had never seen the original broadcasts, because I was too young. But watching them now, I would have to agree with your remark. This could very well have been made today, and in any country.

  • @shawnkristoferu8303
    @shawnkristoferu8303 6 років тому +786

    Sir Arnold, “I have an idea.” Sir Humphrey, “Perhaps you ought to be a Minister.” LOL
    Sir Arnold was my favorite character.

    • @Herman47
      @Herman47 5 років тому +34

      He truly was quite good. The master civil servant.

    • @lehlongwane
      @lehlongwane 5 років тому +28

      *icy glare*
      Sir Humphrey:'Just a joke....'

    • @madabbafan
      @madabbafan 5 років тому +38

      If looks could kill Sir Arnold would be doing 25 years

    • @arcticchrisx7724
      @arcticchrisx7724 5 років тому +12

      Quite possibly the best short gag in any sitcom ever and so well acted with the death stare

    • @gavinkemp7920
      @gavinkemp7920 4 роки тому +9

      @@madabbafan for that he'd have to be found guilty, an unlikely event.

  • @thevoidlookspretty7079
    @thevoidlookspretty7079 4 роки тому +619

    How to summarize most of these conversations: Two or more government officials discussing how best to get nothing done.

    • @sarethuskami5082
      @sarethuskami5082 4 роки тому +53

      I think you mean:
      How to ensure that nothing gets done.

    • @TheDarkstormy
      @TheDarkstormy 4 роки тому +26

      @@sarethuskami5082 Oh no! It's how best to ensure, nothing Political gets done. Alot of things will be happening, just nothing the government wants done.

    • @TheNefastor
      @TheNefastor 4 роки тому +16

      Not "nothing", if you count maximizing cost and making sure as much money as possible flows into the right pockets.

    • @LarsonLake
      @LarsonLake 3 роки тому +20

      @@TheDarkstormy Makes sense from the civil service standpoint. One government comes in makes a bunch of changes. Another one comes to power and changes them all back. Saves a lot of time and effort if you never start working.

    • @perocaster
      @perocaster 3 роки тому +4

      Its called maintaining status quo

  • @terrythomas1329
    @terrythomas1329 4 роки тому +241

    It's about time this whole series was re-aired, not only is it extremely funny, still relevant, well written, well acted etc. it would also save us from the shit that now passes itself off as comedy - Gav n Stacey, Miranda, just naming 2

    • @ignacio330
      @ignacio330 4 роки тому +8

      I acctualy find fascinating the contrast in the representation of the civil service from this series and the thick of it. Im sure someone smarter and with a background in sociology could write a whole thesis from the implications of that contrast

    • @mikejones352
      @mikejones352 4 роки тому

      ch 21 over the air in NJ just started it friday nights 930pm

    • @henrik3291
      @henrik3291 3 роки тому +3

      The ideas put forward in this series has become a bit controversial since Trumps supporters started talking about the deep state.

    • @andrewjones-productions
      @andrewjones-productions 3 роки тому +10

      If they aired this on TV today, I'm quite certain that the BBC would be inundated with complaints about broadcasting a programme in a foreign language.

    • @MLaak86
      @MLaak86 3 роки тому +1

      If this was as widely aired as it should be... pollies would howl blue murder as it'd rip them to pieces.

  • @richardbrown1189
    @richardbrown1189 5 років тому +223

    Nobody could ever accuse the civil service of being involved in the squalid world of professional management!

    • @ahmedamine24
      @ahmedamine24 4 роки тому +5

      @TheRenaissanceman65 Yes, Executive Officer.

    • @johnmccrossan9376
      @johnmccrossan9376 3 роки тому +9

      Nobody could accuse them of anything, by the time they got close enough to unearth any civil service corruption they'd have implicated themselves 20 times on the way there

    • @burgundian-peanuts
      @burgundian-peanuts 8 місяців тому

      Then again, given what I've seen from corporate executives, I'm not sure which is worse.

  • @paiman1976
    @paiman1976 2 роки тому +51

    "Always two there are... A Master and an Apprentice"

    • @Gazzar
      @Gazzar 4 місяці тому +2

      ....a minister and his personal private secretary.

  • @mrbojangles8133
    @mrbojangles8133 8 років тому +151

    Arnold was fantastic

  • @PointyTailofSatan
    @PointyTailofSatan 3 роки тому +202

    As long as the UK has a parliamentary government, these two series will remain completely relevant.

    • @rahulmodi8706
      @rahulmodi8706 2 роки тому +3

      Yes but even with such a system how on earth did Britain conquer so much of the world and make so much progress?

    • @PointyTailofSatan
      @PointyTailofSatan 2 роки тому +15

      @@rahulmodi8706 They are an island nation that survives by trade, either friendly, or by war like domination. They were the Kings of the Sea for centuries.

    • @IRMentat
      @IRMentat 2 роки тому +7

      @@PointyTailofSatan indeed
      people keep thinking it was the government leading the trade but it was mostly the other way around, the government/crown had very good reason to support the trade (MASSIVE tax income and advantaged access to goods few others ever saw)
      So ruling the seas was the best defence and a way to maintain our economic and manufacturing advantages.
      besides, why invade when you can just pay someone local to do all the annoying stuff, Britain wanted to be the patron of trade not the landlord/admin of a bunch of endlessly fighting tribes/factions/warlords, we had already had enough of that in dealing with europe throughout history)
      it all worked out ok until steam/ironclads came in, the 2:1 sail advantage became worthless and the runners-up started to get aspirations. WW1 followed.

    • @zahidbanatwalla
      @zahidbanatwalla 2 роки тому +5

      This is so relevant even here in India since we too follow the Westminster form of government.

    • @AlLiberali
      @AlLiberali 2 роки тому +1

      And honestly I wouldn't change Westminster system with anything ever

  • @robertmcqueen289
    @robertmcqueen289 4 роки тому +49

    This is brilliant. Sir Arnold in Yes minister / Yes Prime minister is the equivalent of Genial Harry Grout in Porridge. Always there in the background. Although not in all episodes in person. But, their names being mentioned with gravitational reverence, but a level of fear if you didn't do what they expected you to do. When they do appear, they are the key person in any scene they're in.
    My personal favourite scene between Sir Arnold & Sir Humphrey is when Sir Humphrey has to get a Civil service Pay claim of 43% passed Jim Hacker. Whilst trying to save his job at the same time. Knowing full well that some very awkward questions have been asked, and will be asked to Sir Frank Gordon when the review is being decided. Brilliant, and fantastic comedy. Pity no one has the courage to show this on television today. So glad l have both of these series on DVD. Hours of enjoyment, and clean entertainment.

    • @herseem
      @herseem 2 роки тому +1

      Your analysis of the position of Sir Arnold and Harry Grout is spot on. And it's a lot of weight for the actor to carry and has to be carried well

    • @tachikomakusanagi3744
      @tachikomakusanagi3744 Рік тому

      Some sort of late 70s comedy zeitgueist resonanse going on there - good point

    • @odysseusrex5908
      @odysseusrex5908 Рік тому

      Past.

  • @johnkealy4164
    @johnkealy4164 5 років тому +40

    I must have watched this scene along with other scenes multiple times and I still find them so funny! Loved Sir Arnold!

    • @WildBikerBill
      @WildBikerBill Рік тому +1

      The one person who instilled fear in Sir Humphrey 😱😅

  • @TheNefastor
    @TheNefastor 4 роки тому +46

    "The squalid world of professional management"... this is funny on so many levels and in so many contexts 😂

    • @DR-fn1if
      @DR-fn1if 3 роки тому +6

      True In some ways the reality is different .. professional corporate management is equally squalid ..

    • @freebornjohn2687
      @freebornjohn2687 Рік тому +1

      The long list of books on professional management that will go on till the end of time. You would have thought that humans would have figured it out by now, we have gone to the other planets, created clones and built AI but managing professionally is still a mystery.

  • @blainoneill5861
    @blainoneill5861 8 років тому +525

    "Once you specify in advance what a project is supposed to achieve and whose responsibility it is to see that it does, the entire system collapses. You're into the whole squalid world of professional management."

    • @DieFlabbergast
      @DieFlabbergast 7 років тому +64

      * "whose responsibility ..." Dear me! Sir Arnold would _never_ have made such a mistake.

    • @RosheruCell
      @RosheruCell 6 років тому +4

      One of my favourite quotes. I always smile when I think about it! 😃

    • @SafwanNet
      @SafwanNet 5 років тому +8

      Hmm, I am still confused. This people donot seem evil so why is it that they do not want to indicate who is responsible for a future project.
      So hard to understand Sir Arnold. Can tou help me.

    • @lb9147
      @lb9147 5 років тому +22

      @@SafwanNet they may not seem evil, nor believe they are evil or necessarily say or do anything which in Britain would be stopped, but this 1980s comedy dramatises a state of play long believed to exist in civil services everywhere

    • @SafwanNet
      @SafwanNet 5 років тому

      @@lb9147 Thanks,
      In your reslonse were you saying "long believed to exist " ?

  • @cyn1clcynide
    @cyn1clcynide 3 роки тому +16

    If I'm not wrong, this episode marked the momentous occasion where Hacker outsmarted Humphrey for the first time in the series. Absolutely glorious to watch.

    • @xuanquang9815
      @xuanquang9815 2 роки тому +3

      yes you are, Jim was trapped and had to ask Humphrey to help him to blackmail the BBC so they will not release his interview

    • @andyray89
      @andyray89 2 роки тому +9

      No, this episode was a resounding win for Sir Humphrey. It's the next episode where Hacker wins, but not for the first time. That episode is titled "the skeleton in the cupboard".

  • @jmccallion2394
    @jmccallion2394 2 роки тому +9

    Sir Arnold was the machevellinian spinmaster par excellence!!

  • @aritragupta4182
    @aritragupta4182 Рік тому +14

    RIP, Sir Arnold. John Nettleton, 1929 - 2023.

  • @regfries8279
    @regfries8279 Рік тому +1

    I love these two. One of the greatest comedies ever. Should be compulsory viewing for anyone starting work in a government department.

  • @yonisali3879
    @yonisali3879 9 років тому +149

    "the trouble is that he thinks has achived something" that line alone makes me wanne go and pay my tv licence
    And i dont even live in uk.

    • @morisan42
      @morisan42 7 років тому +23

      40 years ago, definitely, not nowadays, the BBC has seriously gone downhill

    • @morisan42
      @morisan42 7 років тому +5

      it really has, there is nothing of this quality on nowadays

    • @RosheruCell
      @RosheruCell 7 років тому +5

      BBC 2 and 4 often has something interesting, but on the whole, the classic British comedy has gone forever. There's certainly never going to be anything on this scale for a very long time. If, ever.

    • @jakubsedlak2173
      @jakubsedlak2173 6 років тому +6

      Well, you can't make a comedy when you have to constantly worry about offending someone.

    • @NaziZombieSharpShot
      @NaziZombieSharpShot 6 років тому +2

      In the thick of it was the last good series BBC made, and I'm pretty sure that was over half a decade ago now

  • @JGalt-em4xu
    @JGalt-em4xu Рік тому +6

    Fascinating how furious Sir Arnold became at the suggestion of being 'demoted' to being a 'mere' elected official.

  • @llynfach
    @llynfach 11 років тому +50

    John Nettleton and Richard Vernon brought so much to both series.

  • @jaypandya7441
    @jaypandya7441 3 роки тому +19

    Sir Arnold takes offense when Humphrey says he should become a minister 🤣

  • @Paul-A01
    @Paul-A01 6 років тому +137

    Arnold looks so insulted to be called a minister.

    • @anuradhajoshi7389
      @anuradhajoshi7389 4 роки тому +15

      Ministers come and go. They have to sell themselves to the people giving promising speeches. Imagine pyramid scheme seminar

    • @nottmjas
      @nottmjas 3 роки тому +7

      And so he should. Senior civil servants would have attended Oxford, or at a push Cambridge, whilst ministers would have gone to relatively "lesser" establishments such as the LSE.

  • @Borusa1976
    @Borusa1976 Рік тому +8

    John Nettleton - 12th July 2023 and Nigel Hawthorne - 26 December 2001.... Both actors sadly missed.

    • @MladenPostruznik
      @MladenPostruznik 2 місяці тому

      Derek James Fowlds (2 September 1937 - 17 January 2020) and Paul Clark Eddington (18 June 1927 - 4 November 1995).

  • @mikemorgan7893
    @mikemorgan7893 7 років тому +121

    Shows like this help me forget Mrs Browns Boys

  • @Herman47
    @Herman47 5 років тому +50

    *"Perhaps you ought to become a minister. Just a joke, Arnold!"*

  • @black_hawk9638
    @black_hawk9638 10 років тому +57

    Cabinet Secretary thinks: We are not amused...

  • @jimspink2922
    @jimspink2922 4 роки тому +9

    I' ve got and idea. Perhaps you should become and Minister chuckling. The withering look that Sir Arnold gives Sir Humphrey is enough to cut him in two. Sir Arnold reminds me a bit of a Warrant Officer Class 1 who is a sort of go between the Politicians and the Civil Servants who can make life easy or hard for you depending on how you respect him.

  • @MegaGo68
    @MegaGo68 29 днів тому

    Arnold often gets forgotten about but he was an essential part of the ensemble, and so exquisitely played by John Nettleton, who outlived Hacker, Humphrey, and Bernard.

  • @nobel87able
    @nobel87able 4 місяці тому +1

    "You don't sound appropriately happy" that alone speak a lot of them lol😂

  • @michaelvidal1971
    @michaelvidal1971 3 роки тому +16

    This scene came to mind recently when I was listening to the current Secretary of State for Defence, Ben Wallace, before the Defence Select Committee. He was complaining/observing that the SRO in charge of a Defence Procurement changed so often that during the duration you had about three different SROs. When things went wrong you could not find out who was responsible.

    • @danieldickson8591
      @danieldickson8591 2 роки тому +4

      [Humphrey] "The system working as it should." [/Humphrey]

  • @ohnezuckerohnefett
    @ohnezuckerohnefett Рік тому +1

    Best BBC documentary there ever was.

  • @HomemadeBrownies1
    @HomemadeBrownies1 Рік тому +14

    Rest in peace John Nettleton

    • @childofthe50s53
      @childofthe50s53 Рік тому +2

      Loved Sir Arnold..... Best character in the show

  • @aliahmadbilal666
    @aliahmadbilal666 4 роки тому +5

    Sir Arnold. Is something else

  • @sekil75
    @sekil75 4 роки тому +5

    Great tool for learning English. Just listen to Arnold.

  • @alanmiller63
    @alanmiller63 11 років тому +30

    Simply the best.

  • @Barbarous_Wretch
    @Barbarous_Wretch Рік тому +3

    "...the whole squalid world of professional management." 😂

  • @dipro001
    @dipro001 7 місяців тому +1

    I am quite a fearless guy. However, i do get the sense that i would not be too relaxed if i ever met Sir Arnold in person.

  • @ellenthorne8222
    @ellenthorne8222 Рік тому +1

    RIP John Nettleton, Sir Arnold is now reunited with Sir Humphrey, Bernard and Jim Hacker. You were perfect as Sir Arnold as were Nigel, Derek and Paul. ❤

  • @donelion6459
    @donelion6459 4 роки тому +28

    Sir Humphrey slipped once , after that look he wouldn't repeat it again .

  • @brodereck1
    @brodereck1 22 дні тому

    John Nettleton is an actor of genius. He steals every scene he’s in.

  • @petergreen5337
    @petergreen5337 Рік тому +3

    It's always a pleasure watching these men discuss the affairs of the country 😂😂

  • @peterbradshaw8018
    @peterbradshaw8018 10 років тому +38

    The cabinet secretary is not amused!

  • @pix046
    @pix046 7 років тому +40

    A minister with two ideas... I can't remember ...

  • @HomeFreeinmySUV
    @HomeFreeinmySUV 13 років тому +58

    I love the way the English 'subversively' comment, blast and critique their own govt...without being overt about it....

    • @yonisali3879
      @yonisali3879 8 років тому +7

      In England u Learn to suppress your emotions and get on with things hard to do in hot countries but i have always made some sound decisions standing on the rain Drenched grey streets of London..

    • @readsomebooks666
      @readsomebooks666 6 років тому +4

      And then you watch The Thick Of It.

    • @SafwanNet
      @SafwanNet 5 років тому +1

      I love your voccabulary

    • @SafwanNet
      @SafwanNet 5 років тому +1

      @@yonisali3879
      I am in London. Help me to make those cool decisions.

    • @thoughtfuljanitor6627
      @thoughtfuljanitor6627 5 років тому +1

      Sorry, but this is in no way subtle. It’s clear that they paint officials as afraid of achievement specifically to critique they government

  • @timbunker4529
    @timbunker4529 14 днів тому

    Wonderful, just the best.

  • @mellowfellow6816
    @mellowfellow6816 4 роки тому +6

    Two ideas - that's Prime Minister material right there

  • @squizza28
    @squizza28 Рік тому +1

    You don't joke with Sir Arnold!

  • @cwam1701e
    @cwam1701e 5 місяців тому

    The look on Arnold's face when Humphrey jokes that he should become a minister...!

  • @robinmyman
    @robinmyman Рік тому +3

    RIP Sir.

  • @daisies53
    @daisies53 11 років тому +6

    Wonderful! Absolutely Wonderful!
    Thank you so much for these!
    Used to really love the series! :)

  • @jeremywilliams5107
    @jeremywilliams5107 16 днів тому

    "Perhaps you should become a minister" - The room temperature drops 40° and ice starts forming on the chief civil servant's brow.

  • @mattwho81
    @mattwho81 3 роки тому +4

    If you want something done give it to someone whose already busy.
    If you want something stopped give it to a committee.

  • @mark4lev
    @mark4lev Рік тому +1

    Ah , the policy of moving officials around every 3 years to avoid responsibility, that was mentioned by Cummings in his blog, so still happening

  • @JonatasAdoM
    @JonatasAdoM 3 роки тому +1

    Love how the civil service holds precedent of the tries.

  • @daisies53
    @daisies53 11 років тому +1

    Still do! Just that I rarely ever see it to reminisce! :)

  • @gibbogle
    @gibbogle 2 роки тому +1

    Brilliant.

  • @warringtonminge4167
    @warringtonminge4167 3 місяці тому +1

    If you think _Yes, [Prime] Minister_ is just comedy or satire you've missed the point, it's as near to documentary as it gets without breaching the Official Secrets Act.

  • @JRBendixen
    @JRBendixen 5 місяців тому +1

    Nothing has changed. Smoking should be trown to the dirt, and yet here we are.

  • @jameswebb4593
    @jameswebb4593 3 роки тому

    Bertie Woosters brilliant comment could describe Boris and Raab . Two minds and not a single thought.

  •  3 роки тому

    Timeless Will be relevant 100 yrs from now

  • @mrpeel3239
    @mrpeel3239 4 роки тому +3

    Any guess on which Gentleman's Club the setting is based? Can't make out the portrairs? The Carlton, perhaps?

    • @johnking5174
      @johnking5174 4 роки тому +2

      The Athenaeum - it is written in the Yes Minister diaries

    • @mrpeel3239
      @mrpeel3239 4 роки тому +1

      @@johnking5174 Interesting!

    • @johnking5174
      @johnking5174 4 роки тому +1

      @@mrpeel3239 It is where they went for lunch

    • @mrpeel3239
      @mrpeel3239 4 роки тому +2

      @@johnking5174 always thought the Athenaeum was more about ponderous clergy than irreverent Torys!

    • @johnking5174
      @johnking5174 4 роки тому +2

      @@mrpeel3239 Sir Humphrey was a member, as stated in the diaries

  • @adoreslaurel
    @adoreslaurel 6 років тому +4

    Is it true that in Britain with paying a TV licence fee [we used to have them in OZ] that you don't have to suffer commercial breaks?

  • @jonnnyren6245
    @jonnnyren6245 2 роки тому +4

    Sir Arnold Plagueis and Sir Humphrey Palpatine scheming.

  • @danielkrajnik3817
    @danielkrajnik3817 3 роки тому

    amazing chemistry

  • @MrFIZZYMann
    @MrFIZZYMann 11 місяців тому

    Sir Arnold's Character Reminds Me of
    ☆ Tinker, Taylor, Soldier, Spy ☆

  • @winternow2242
    @winternow2242 3 роки тому +11

    "You should become a minister"
    Humphrey is like the John Wick of the British Civil Service.

    • @danieldickson8591
      @danieldickson8591 2 роки тому +1

      No, that would be Sir Arnold. All of his remarks were always on target and lethal.

  • @dilis5105
    @dilis5105 3 роки тому +10

    Notice when Arnold says civil service moves everyone around each 3 years to make not possible to have "personal responsibility"...

  • @foneco
    @foneco Рік тому +1

    RIP John

  • @CiceroLounge
    @CiceroLounge 5 років тому +1

    Humphrey! That old ols scheme of Cardwrightt

  • @Richard_is_cool
    @Richard_is_cool 10 років тому +12

    It's Humphrey, not Humphery.

    • @Morbius1963
      @Morbius1963 7 років тому

      Auntie used to be "dear". Now she goes to work in Washington without any knickers on. Saves time.

    • @richardlloyd2589
      @richardlloyd2589 4 роки тому

      And for those who knew him since school, “Humpy.”

  • @gtspeak
    @gtspeak 5 років тому +1

    Wonderful! Btw, What drink do they have in those glasses along with their tea or coffee?

    • @johnking5174
      @johnking5174 5 років тому +8

      Brandy. It is traditional to serve after dinner tea or coffee with brandy and cigars in private gentlemens clubs.

    • @gtspeak
      @gtspeak 5 років тому +2

      John King thank you!

  • @bobotoksy
    @bobotoksy 4 місяці тому

    Absolutely classic

  • @harryslide
    @harryslide 12 років тому +73

    This was made when TV actually had a purpose. Then it went all cesspool.

    • @JimShadyUK
      @JimShadyUK 5 років тому +5

      'Our mission is "to act in the public interest, serving all audiences through the provision of impartial, high-quality and distinctive output and services which inform, educate and entertain".'
      They BBC still dares to have this as their mission statement.

    • @richardlloyd2589
      @richardlloyd2589 4 роки тому +1

      JimShadyUK
      Ironically I believe YM, or YPM, referred to this as “disposing of the tricky part in the title”.
      as an example “East German Democratic Republic” was used.

  • @jameswhittingham8027
    @jameswhittingham8027 4 роки тому

    Sir Humphrey was in Woodard.

  • @ahcokris
    @ahcokris 6 років тому +9

    Now, now Sir Humphrey, no need to be vulgar with your boss =)

  • @paddymcginty1264
    @paddymcginty1264 4 роки тому +1

    The most comfortable chairs in the world

  • @johnrhodez6829
    @johnrhodez6829 2 місяці тому

    Same set but Bernard is there as well. It is suggested that perhaps Hacker should become Prime Minister.
    Bernard looks at his watch.
    Humphrey"Dk you have somewhere to be Bernard? "
    "Bernard" Er, no, I was just making sure that it wasn't April the First! "

  • @theGhoulman
    @theGhoulman 10 років тому +42

    Funny, but considering the average Ministers silliness, and the considered experience of the bureaucracy (which these two represent here), I'd take the bureaucracy. At least! ;p

    • @the-chillian
      @the-chillian 9 років тому +29

      +theGhoulman That's good, because one of the points of the show is that the bureaucracy is what you actually get regardless of who the ministers are.

    • @theGhoulman
      @theGhoulman 9 років тому +1

      Lytrigian
      Soooo, someone who actually knew what he or she was doing. ;p

    • @otocan
      @otocan 8 років тому +31

      They know exactly what they are doing, unfortunately what they are doing is trying to secure a large as possible budget for themselves whilst implementing exactly 0 changes.

    • @theGhoulman
      @theGhoulman 6 років тому

      @ otocan - Dude, whatever budget, etc., didn't make them rich or anything. WTF

    • @JonatasMonte
      @JonatasMonte 6 років тому

      But the bureaucracy has always been in charge. At least it is inefficient.

  • @cartoonking461
    @cartoonking461 3 роки тому +2

    Now we understand what the swamp is really all about.

    • @RabbiHerschel
      @RabbiHerschel 3 роки тому

      The "swamp" is basically this except that everyone has a long nose and a name ending in -berg or -stein.

  • @cradle652
    @cradle652 4 роки тому +2

    Why do I remember Sherlock and Mycroft Holmes?

  • @JonatasMonte
    @JonatasMonte 6 років тому +2

    I read 2 ministers, 1 idea.

  • @AdmiralSpaceballs
    @AdmiralSpaceballs Рік тому +1

    look at the table , do brits drink coffee (or tea or whatever ) and hard liquor at the same time ?

    • @chrishampton1981
      @chrishampton1981 Рік тому +1

      Sometimes yes. Usually coffee with a glass of brandy

  • @Connor-vj7vf
    @Connor-vj7vf 3 роки тому +1

    Is anyone able to briefly explain why this idea is a bad one?
    All I can think is that bureaucrats would extort each other for favours when they knew one HAD to get a job completed. That's the only bad bit I can think of though but I'm sure I'm missing something

    • @shanepower9201
      @shanepower9201 3 роки тому +7

      The strength of British upper civil service is its ability to close ranks, they all work together to make sure no one can be held accountable. Adding names make this a lot harder as none of them want to do any work at all and most government projects fail so there would be a lot of investigating

  • @johnboyginger
    @johnboyginger 3 роки тому

    Sounds like he says “ Just a joke Arthur” rather than Arnold. A blooper?

  • @briancuthbertson6448
    @briancuthbertson6448 3 роки тому

    Sir Arnold Robinson is obviously based on former Civil Service Head Sir Robert Armstrong.

    • @Blackcomanche
      @Blackcomanche 3 роки тому

      Do you have a source to support this statement?

  • @carljohanrydberg357
    @carljohanrydberg357 Рік тому

    The closest Humphrey have ever been to having his soundness questioned.

  • @MAA1591
    @MAA1591 19 днів тому

    This is still a good idea.

  • @justRayEvansopinion
    @justRayEvansopinion 5 років тому +6

    Sir Arnold would solve the Brexit crisis....eventually.

    • @olivinator
      @olivinator 5 років тому +11

      at the appropriate junction, in the fullness of time.

    • @RabbiHerschel
      @RabbiHerschel 3 роки тому +2

      @@olivinator Taking one thing with another, of course.

  • @JohnMcCulloch75
    @JohnMcCulloch75 5 років тому +4

    Sir Humphrey's tie is my old school tie!

    • @RasheedKhan-he6xx
      @RasheedKhan-he6xx 4 роки тому +1

      Which school is that Sir John?

    • @JohnMcCulloch75
      @JohnMcCulloch75 4 роки тому +1

      @@RasheedKhan-he6xx That was St. Paul's School, the British school in Brazil. www.stpauls.br

    • @jonathanfraser321
      @jonathanfraser321 4 роки тому

      Sir Humphrey s old school tie would have been Winchester. If he'd worn his university ie it would have been balliol college(Bailei n the series)

  • @GanzLONDON
    @GanzLONDON 13 років тому

    @marypoppins2009 Used to !

  • @Chanks420
    @Chanks420 11 років тому +1

    What episode was this from. Would appreciate the help.

    • @michaelduggan2031
      @michaelduggan2031 7 років тому +1

      There were only 4 series ever made. Two as 'Yes minister' and two as 'Yes prime minister'. They were made by BBC and only got shown on the BBC2 less viewed channel. I believe it started as a radio play type show at least at first. One of the writers was left wing the other right. They were both very well conected in parliament and had good contacts. Essentially the BBC always had to be neutral and had the first series when hacker is head of a ficticious beaurocratic office. The show was meant to be shelved but word got out and a next series comes out. Still the TV audience including Margaret Thatcher demanded more. That ensured the revival as YPM, but this time no topic could be left out. In many ways Hacker is Thatcher particularly because of the storylines that could easily be identified as 80s political issues and events. You can get the BBC radio versions from archives you should be able to get the videos and I am sure you can still pick up the books either as a set of two or set of four. Hope you get to enjoy all of this brilliant piece of satirical comedy.

    • @dsmscenester
      @dsmscenester 7 років тому

      We were under the assumption that there three series of Yes Minister and two of Yes Prime Minister, with the special "Party Games" episode, chronicling how Humphrey and the Civil Service engineered Hacker to be PM. That's what I've researched years ago and Wikipedia affirmed it?

    • @JESK-lx4js
      @JESK-lx4js 7 років тому

      dsmscenester You're correct, I've got the DVDs to prove it.

    • @RandallHallKaizenReiki
      @RandallHallKaizenReiki 6 років тому +4

      Since nobody else answered, it's The Challenge from Series 3

  • @c2757
    @c2757 9 місяців тому

    Is it not truly marvellous that BBC Studios can't spell 'Humphry' despite the fact that is the name of a character in their own video!

  • @adoreslaurel
    @adoreslaurel 5 років тому +4

    Sounds like the Catholic church moving its non performing [or perhaps performing in an unsavoury manner] priests from one parish to another.

    • @RabbiHerschel
      @RabbiHerschel 3 роки тому

      Or like secular public school teachers accused of molesting their charges being shuffled around.

    • @adoreslaurel
      @adoreslaurel 3 роки тому +1

      @@RabbiHerschel Do they do that too? well we know of one down East St Kilda way, and now she is back from the promised land hopefully we shall soon see a trial.

    • @RabbiHerschel
      @RabbiHerschel 3 роки тому

      @@adoreslaurel at least here in the US, it's incredibly common. Exponentially more so than the supposed prominence of it in the RCC, although you'll never hear the media say so. (Interestingly, that only became a thing itself after the Vatican started encouraging homosexuals to enter the priesthood, but again, not something you'll ever hear about in the media.)

    • @adoreslaurel
      @adoreslaurel 3 роки тому

      @@RabbiHerschel I think the Priesthood has been full of them forever, Popes used to be married but then one of them ruled that Priests must put all their efforts into the religion, I think that Pope might have been gay. Stupid rule, so is the confessional. I am down under. the school in question was Adass Israel.

  • @anandacharyuluadvocatefami680
    @anandacharyuluadvocatefami680 4 роки тому +2

    1.16 new responsibilities are for enjoying not exercising ha ha

  • @howtokillapig
    @howtokillapig 11 років тому +1

    "Used" to?