I grew up as a child of a self-identified sovereign citizen. She would preach to my sister and me about it as if it was something to proud of, and would even take us to court as she tried to pull off typical sovereign citizen nonsense (which included claiming court cases didn't apply to her because the "entity" to which they applied to, that was made up of all capital letters, was not her, the human being). Ken is absolutely right about how dumb, laxidasical, and nit-picky the whole sovereign citizen ideology is. It caused nothing but unnecessary grief and strife for my family. Something that's not mentioned very often with these kind of cases is just how damaging exposure to this ideology is for children. It took me a lot longer than it should of to become a normal, functioning member of society, and a large part of it is due to my mom being a "sovereign citizen." I pray for the absolute best for their children, because their parents are setting them up for failure, whether they know it or not.
@joyseegers5783 It's okay. I definitely got a first-hand understanding of "making it hard on yourself" and "getting out of your own way" because of it, which I apply to my adult life constantly. I appreciate the kind words 🙏
yoooo the thing about the entity not being the human being.. when Ken mentioned they use weird wording and stuff that was the VERY first thing I thought of bc I'd heard it a LOT in courtrooms when I interned at the courthouse, but I couldn't remember the exact wording of it. pretty much any time a sovereign citizen came to court, they'd ask the judge to speak and immediately start spouting that line and a bunch of other nonsensical stuff. I'm super glad you were able to learn and grow from it, tho! pretty much every one of them went to jail anyway, even if the offense didn't call for jail time bc they'd be held in contempt for not stopping their schpiel when the judge asked them to stop talking.
@@misstiredeyes Thank you! Yeah, the end result being jail was my mom's experience as well. When I was a kid, I thought there was more to what my mom was trying to do that I didn't understand, but, now that I'm older, I realize there was nothing more to get. Everything she was doing and attempting to do was as dumb as I thought it was as a kid.
It’s like when kids play tag and one kid gets salty when they’re caught so they suddenly proclaim that they’re in a safe zone and no touch backs are allowed of a sudden. 😂
Pulling out a knife during a traffic stop the way she did till typically get you guns pointed at you by the police, and very possibly shot. Thankfully the police knew about the baby before she tried that. In any case, she put that baby in unnecessary danger by doing that.
A peaceful person is NEVER responsible for violence POLICE put on them. If she was in danger of being shot for NOT rushing at them or making threats, then the cop was fucking up. Period.
@@ashkebora7262 "Peaceful people" don't have violence put on them by the police. The *MAJORITY* of cases where a police officer has to use force, or as you choose to say "violence, the person they are using force against was being violent first, or putting other people in danger in some manner. If people don't break the law, they don't get arrested. Before anybody says something dumb like, "You've clearly never been in this situation."... I've been arrested, and have spent plenty of time in jail, and it's because, I was BREAKING THE LAW. The police had every right to arrest me. My windows have never been busted out, and they've never beat the hell out of me, because I followed their *lawful* orders.
Even the Amish people don't call themselves sovereign citizens and they act more like it than most of these people. Having and driving a vehicle is not a right but a privilege. How difficult is that for people to understand?
Insanely hard when your average person doesn't care about the world outside of their subjective experience. The same reason the US can't elect a real leader.
The craziest part of the Sovereign Citizen movement to me is that every single one of them that goes to court and tries this crap in front of a judge loses. And all the others see that it doesn't work and STILL do it. If there was one shred of evidence that there was some validity to it and that it could be argued in court, I would understand, but there's nothing to back up their claims.
Sadly enough of them "win" that these sovereign citizens think they're right. Really these cases are just getting dismissed bc the courts are too busy to be dealing with this silliness.
Not true! I have beat multiple charges using this method. There are only 3 laws do not steal or cause damage to property, don't murder/harm others and do not commit fraudulent contracts. Aside from that act, statutes, codes and edicts are not laws.
I guess their hope is that if enough people do it, eventually some exemption to the law will be added. Like how the Amish are allowed to let their horses shit all over the road, but if my dog shits on the sidewalk and I don't clean it up I can get fined lol
It only works on thing judge doesn’t have time to deal with. If you get a speeding ticket or whatever, the judge will not want to deal with the antics. But when it’s more serious, they have all the time in the world
The lady was holding the baby in her lap instead of a carrier, plus pulling out that knife instead of just giving a verbal answer, that family is doomed bruh
Hate to say it, but child protective services seriously needs to look into this lady. Pulling a knife out while holding a baby during a traffic stop can put that baby in a LOT of danger.
lmfao your mom is TOO kind dude loololololo sometimes if u can actually make people realize how stupid they are its best for themself, but i have given up lol
Because your mom knows arguing with them is a fool’s game. She might even have already had this circle-jerk conversation with them. You won’t win. They won’t WANT to understand. An argument will ensue. You will get very angry. Save your angry for something else. (Dealers choice!) However, I’m not saying you’re wrong. I don’t have patience for circle-jerk conversations with these people.
Worked for a major cell phone company. We'd get people trying to pay with a 10 page document, claiming under various treaties, this was a legal money order. Guess whose phone got turned off.
13:09 Ngl, this cop is such a mood. 😂 There are a lot of problems with police in America, but I do enjoy the random cam vids that show a lotta cops are just regular dudes fed up with this shit.
Power struggle on the part of the cop, most cops become cops because they want to control and be bullies. She is using her gut instinct (which most people lack) and his aura is that of evil. I bet they aren’t religious which is what you both are assuming.
I used to work as a bank teller and we had one of these guys come in making a fuss constantly... all his mortgage payments were by checks, which he'd sign in red ink with "all rights reserved" under his signature, and stamp "void" on before using them for payments. My pathetic boss at the time preferred making me feel stupid over doing anything about this guy and yelled at me any time I brought it up. He constantly brought in huge bundles of paperwork for us to mail off to corporate too, which we were instructed to shred. It was infuriating.
They always say “I’m not driving, I’m traveling.” I know that everything they say is stupid, but to me, that is really stupid, I guess none of us are driving, we are all just a bunch of travelers 😂
So they wrongly equate something. There is a right to travel that is guaranteed in the US, and they quote some old Black's law dictionary to say if it's not for commerce, it's not driving. They fail to notice that no one is stopping their right to travel, as they can walk anywhere they want. That's why they stick all this "not for commerce" on their cars.
I can be weird myself a lot ... If they claim to be that much souvereign, they are free to travel ... as long as they get a travel visa everytime they want to leave their property. Thought that visa doesnt automaticly include their car. To operate a car outside of their souvereingnity, they still need a valid drivers licence and insurance for the car.
My favorite cop response to a sovereign citizen was something along the lines of "I'm not a citizen of Canada but if I go there and use their roads I still have to follow their traffic laws. If you are using an American road you have to follow those traffic laws" I don't understand what they dont understand about the fact that you can be as sovereign as you want but when you leave your property and come on to American land you have to follow the law. If you travel to another country you have to get a license to drive there. On top of the fact that constitutional rights only to American Citizens in most cases. You literally don't have rights to anything if you don't acknowledge the government that outlined those rights.
This!! I also feel like if cops started saying "Ok sir/ma'am you're telling me you're not a citizen or holder of a visa that grants you access to the United States? Uh oh buddy, time to deport you" these sovereign people would suddenly be all "oh no sir I'm a citizen of America!!" 😂 Like I'm not one for deporting people randomly but goddamn
Same if you live in a country. If you reside in a country, you have to follow that country's laws. Sadly we do have some of these numb nuts up here in Canada as well. Some tried it at the Windsor-Sarnia border years ago and you can imagine how well that went over with US Customs. They were arrested and their car confiscated. And they recorded their idiocy as well. Play stupid games with law enforcement and win stupid prizes like an arrest.
not even when they leave their property, the US like most countries, have land ownership as more of a license to use as you please while you pay property taxes. Laws are not invalidated when you are on your property.
@@liamnehren1054 We have to say we're North American here in Canada because if you say you're American, it means you're from the USA. And believe me, we don't want to be lumped in with them.
It's like one person got a thesaurus and thought "if I change the words then the law doesn't apply!" It's the same as saying "I didn't steal it, I permanently borrowed it with no plans on returning it"
having a thesaurus helps a lot because similar words can be identical in meaning but have different connotations/denotations (ex: house vs. home) and that's great for deciphering intentions ... but they need to know replacing a keyword with a bunch of identical meanings is not gonna get you out of jail lol honestly, in my opinion, if you're accusing someone of stealing and they keep saying everything identical except for the actual word, it seems more guilty than anything...
I don't know, I would kind of think First Nations have a legimate right to say that and might have a very different notion of "borrowing things with no plans on returning it".
You guys are great!! I have a co-worker at my job who is a sovereign citizen and some of the stuff they spout makes me just shake my head and walk away. I can 100% relate to these cops reactions.
I think he admitted he didn't understand what he was saying and pulled all his info from a UA-cam video. It kind of seems to me like its the wifes idea and the husband just went along with it.
That’s what I’m saying! Watch. They won’t be charged with child neglect. The courts coddle these idiots which just give them motivation to keep doing this! The courts need to throw the book at these idiots if they want to stop this.
Doesnt the word ever get back to the other sovereign citizens that this stuff doesn't work? Has anyone ever been travelling on the road with no license, and were let go by the police because they were a sovereign citizen.
The sovereign citizen argument has literally never worked in court. But these are the same people who are often flat earthers or anti vaxxers, so common sense is not very common among them.
Cousin and uncles are cops especially where the couple got picked up they don’t even let these people argue anything, they tell them that they are going to jail for driving without a license and a valid tag on the vehicle. Then tells them if they want to fight it they can with the judge……non of them have won a case.
"im travelinf across my private property" You are on on a public road sir. Also they can at least charge them both for neglect or failure to have the baby in a car seat...Plus No tag, and they arent operating it....but they were driving it.... My brain hurts...
CPS really needs to be involved here. Not only for having the baby on her lap while driving. Her pulling out a knife while holding that baby during a police stop puts that baby in a LOT of potential danger. Normally pulling a knife out on the police will at minimum result in them pointing their guns at you, and often worse.
@@KirillT14 True. There are many billionaires that have ideas to build “planned communities” so they don’t have to pay taxes or follow certain laws. They fail at planning because they don’t realize that SOMEONE has to maintain their infrastructure, clean, cook, settle disputes etc and they’re not going to do any of it! They despise the working class while demanding they be served. Unfortunately the working class applaud that thinking they’ll be joining them one day or they’ll be kept as pets. Even though they brag about being able to fire people who try to advocate for better pay.
Refuses to follow basic instructions and produce registration and identification, then blames the cops for the consequences of those actions. Man still would have been ticketed or possibly arrested for driving without a license, but if she had been driving, and they had produced registration and identification up front, all of this could have been avoided 🤦🏼♀
Oh NOOOOO!!!! My husband's actions have consequences, and do do mine. Her teaching her children that police officers are bad people is insane. You should NEVER make children *FEAR* the police. All that will do is ensure that they don't ask them for help when they actually need them.
I saw one in the wild once, you could tell by the "license plate" on the car. It was a weird reference to a state legal statute, and when I looked it up it was a generic law about property ownership. Turns out that sovcits in my state like to think that this law means they don't have to have their vehicles registered to drive them on the road.
The main thing I don't understand about SC is that even if you acknowledge you're sovereign citizenship You're still operating under another country's rules and are subject to those laws/penalties/punishments Can anyone explain that?
They are basically knit picking several laws, many of which are still “technically” on the books, but overwritten by others to get to the outcome they want. Like a big chunk of it comes from combining maritime law with some of the earliest laws of the United States to get the sovereign part. The right to travel is from a Supreme Court case that said traveling is a fundamental right of humans, but they leave out the part where that same case adds “there are conditions the government can restrict it like if you are a criminal or if you are traveling to a war zone”, because that case was concerning a commie who wanted to go to a communist country in the 60s(I think) and the government kept rejecting his passport. Supreme Court said he had a right to travel there and can’t refuse him solely on “we don’t like there are a lot of communists there”, so that’s where they are getting this. It’s only concerning international travel. I don’t remember the exact “commercial vehicle” case, but it had something to do with a simple regulation stating you needed to be licensed to engage in commerce I believe, so they are trying to say since that one case said you need to be licensed to transport goods to sell, that means nobody else needs a license. I looked it up because I hate the government as much as next man, and would like it all to be true, but it’s basically stupid people thinking they can outsmart the government.
So, at least from a philosophical standpoint, it's not actually possible to explain. Their, oh let's call it an "interpretation" of laws are inherently self-contradictory. Just for fun, I once tried to trace out how they rationalize everything and it just gave me a headache. So, short version, I don't think it's possible to explain. The people who buy into this like hearing it and are convinced that they have these rights and don't recognize that, no matter what, the state is obviously not going to grant their arguments.
The biggest thing that makes me think these people aren't the brightest is that even foreign visitors can be held responsible for breaking the law in the US. How can they think that they won't be held responsible living in the US?
The fear in the officers voice when she pulled that knife... So scary, the trama that would've come from shooting a woman carrying a baby is beyond horrific. So glad they handled that as well as they did.
There are loopholes where you don't need a license, plates, or registration to operate a motor vehicle and travel, but once you get on a public roadway, they dissapear.
These sovereign citizens hate following rules and paying taxes, but they sure love the benefits of a stable society. Benefits like grocery stores and having a landmine-free road to transport their personal property on.
i saw this compilation yesterday and said “eh i wanna watch some ken not any body cams today just not the vibe” then this morning right as i wake up to ready myself for work im greeted with a reaction from ken and buff and not only is it body cam, its SOVEREIGN CITIZENS, the best of the best, the greatest entitlement filled videos ever
They act like they are riding a dang bus... you're the driver, you're no longer just traveling, you are the conductor of the vehicle which you need a license for in every single state.
A lot of them go by an outdated version of "Black's Law Dictionary", where the word "employed" is used in an older way meaning just doing something. Like I'm "employed in taking a dump". They figure being "employed driving" is commercial, needs a license but private travel does not. They also misinterpret the right to travel. It is conditional for operating a motor vehicle. It means you cannot be restricted from crossing state borders.
My ex went full sovcit in child support court recently. It was HILARIOUS. The decision came down last week. Guess what? He still owes me the $65K he never paid during our daughter's childhood, even though she's in her 20's now. Doofus thought if he avoided it till she grew up, it would just go away. 😆
Trying to talk to a sovereign citizen is basically the same as a flat earther. They never listen and spurt all kinds of nonsense. And they find one example and they usually stick to that 1 example.
@littlefurrow2437 I still carry my ID everywhere lol I just don't have the money to be spending on insurance, tags, inspections, and maintenance. The expense list goes on, and I'm poor
My takeaway is she is the brains of this duo and has somehow convinced him of this Sovereign Citizen malarkey. The way he is pleading and she's just letting him take the fall while being snarky.... She's the one they should lock up.
When I first started watching body cams of sovcit confrontations, you could tell the police were perplexed. “Traveling not driving… _what_ ?” “I don’t know, Sarge, he’s saying something about maritime law… yeah… yeah… no idea, sarge.” In a bit less than a year we’ve progressed to, “Oooohh, it’s a sovereign citizen. Goddamnit.”
Instead of shcadenfraude, I read up on Maslow's Heirarchy and heard a reference to type of humour self-activating minded people have. They like to laugh at human failings and attempts to do things beyond human capability, or failed systems. Like a dead deer in the pool don't know why that on made me laugh. I thought I had some schedenfeude but I just think it's silly when plans don't work out
Yes. You are allowed to “travel” anywhere you wish in the United States, per the Constitution. You may: 1. Enter and leave any State. 2. Treated as a visitor in those states. 3. To be treated like any other citizen, and be treated as a resident if you move there. THAT'S IT. That's the “Travel Clause” in the Constitution. It's Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1. It's easy to look up. The one of the reasons for this clause was to prevent States from limiting access to resources, for example, limiting medical care to ONLY citizens of their state. This clause would be associated with the Fourteenth Amendment concerning Citizenship, so everyone who is a citizen is treated the same, state to state. It's the 10th Amendment that allows States to create laws about Driver's Licenses, Registration of Vehicles (plates).
There's no logic here. Even as a "traveler", you still have to follow the laws of the country you are in. If I go to Singapore and start chewing gum and get caught, I'm gonna get in trouble.
As someone from Washington State, she can stay in Florida; we don't want her. And Amish, Mennonite, and native rez are sovereign, but they don't do any of that nonsense. These people have too much time on their hands to act up like this.
8:37 the cackle that came out of me having watched this train wreck already and knowing what's coming 💀🤣 Watching you two react to this madness absolutely made my day.
If you need to move your truck and you don't have a licence, they have a special bigger truck that you can put your truck on the back of. Then somebody with a DRIVERS LICENCE can move the truck for you
The way I was just watching a police cam video like this when this popped up. I think the, errrm, lady in question will be featured in this video too 😂
The thing upsets me the most is that she thinks she can just drive away while holding a baby.. no car seat no drive. She should definitely be arrested too for endangering that child
After pulling out a knife while holding that baby during a traffic stop, which can easily get a person show by the police. Really hope child protective services looks into this.
I actually live about 5 minutes from Waldo. They picked the WORST place to be dealing with cops. Florida cops are rough, but Waldo is a whole new ball game. Waldo cops will pull you over if they see a passenger holding a phone, vaping, or if you're going 1mph over the speed limit. You don't mess around with Florida cops, let alone Waldo cops That knife could have gotten him some serious jail time btw, they let him off easy. Largest concealed carry knife you can have has to be a folding knife and less than a 4 inch blade. Machetes are any blade that has a larger edge than 4 inches. This is legally classified as a machete. These people are braindead.
Is common law recognized anywhere in the US? I remember when they did away with it where I live, my aunt and her partner were married under common law and they made a huge deal of it when it was no longer a thing. I always assumed they were grandfathered in but I didn't care to look into it further for them. I was just glad they did away with common law because if I wanted to marry my long time partner I would have
Has any one of these jackasses EVER uploaded a video where they pulled this "I'm travelling and I'm exempt from your laws" shit, and the cop turned round and said, "Oh... sorry sir, my mistake... your semi-constitutional paperwork all checks out... away you go, about your business! You have a nice day now!" Ever?
5:00 that was the most clean coordinated window break ive ever seen a cop do. Ive seen videos of cops using their elbows and even their fist, punching the windows, not many that use these easy tools
Yoooo! That woman is WILD!! Are you kidding me? “You’re an idiot. I don’t like you. Let me in my truck. That’s how moronic you guys are” swinging a knife around…like wtf? How she didn’t get tased, arrested, etc. is CRAZY!! People have most definitely been killed by police for soooo much less. Omg I hated this whooole thing. Please, please God don’t ever let me meet any one of these types of people in the wild. This is so unbelievable
Casual reminder that you can have a healthy and reasonable distrust of authority without acting like a toddler caught with their hand in the cookie jar. You're not gonna do anything but stack charges by arguing with cops, deal with it in court with legal representation.
The most common argument for the right to travel on a SCOTUS ruling from 1925 called Thompson v Smith. They quote the first lines of the decision and ignore the two more that follow it. Here is the full text. “The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right in doing so to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day; and under the existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purposes of life and business. The exercise of such a common right the city may, under its police power, regulate in the interest of the public safety and welfare... The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions." When you read the full text is clearly supports the legality of driver's licenses. They will also point to Black's Law Dictionary 2nd edition published on 1910 which defines as a driver as someone using s motor vehicle for commerce. That is because in 1910 New York was the only state that issued licenses and that only for commercial vehicles. The first private licenses where not invented until 1913. And held to constitutional on 1915 Hendrick v Maryland.
I just feel so so sad for the kids. Their parents are so messed up. They just wanted to go to the beach. So sad that parents can’t pull themselves together for their kids
The paperwork is just the Ron Swanson permit. "I can do what I want"
LOL!
Literally what I was thinking lmao
It just written in crayons
"Diz zitizen is allowed two do wat ever he wants"
Signed by Winston Churchill
Chef's kiss 👨🍳
First thing a thought of 😹
“He’s transporting his private property “
Yea… by DRIVING IT 🤦♀️
On a PUBLIC ROAD! 😂
He’s travelling his stuff 😤😤😂😂
No, the car was in “T,” for “travel” 😭😂
This is in Waldo Florida (outside of Gainesville FL) they are good representatives of the Waldo people 100%
@@julianajaxson it’s always either Florida or Ohio
I grew up as a child of a self-identified sovereign citizen. She would preach to my sister and me about it as if it was something to proud of, and would even take us to court as she tried to pull off typical sovereign citizen nonsense (which included claiming court cases didn't apply to her because the "entity" to which they applied to, that was made up of all capital letters, was not her, the human being). Ken is absolutely right about how dumb, laxidasical, and nit-picky the whole sovereign citizen ideology is. It caused nothing but unnecessary grief and strife for my family. Something that's not mentioned very often with these kind of cases is just how damaging exposure to this ideology is for children. It took me a lot longer than it should of to become a normal, functioning member of society, and a large part of it is due to my mom being a "sovereign citizen." I pray for the absolute best for their children, because their parents are setting them up for failure, whether they know it or not.
I’m so sorry you had to grow up like this !
@joyseegers5783 It's okay. I definitely got a first-hand understanding of "making it hard on yourself" and "getting out of your own way" because of it, which I apply to my adult life constantly. I appreciate the kind words 🙏
yoooo the thing about the entity not being the human being.. when Ken mentioned they use weird wording and stuff that was the VERY first thing I thought of bc I'd heard it a LOT in courtrooms when I interned at the courthouse, but I couldn't remember the exact wording of it. pretty much any time a sovereign citizen came to court, they'd ask the judge to speak and immediately start spouting that line and a bunch of other nonsensical stuff. I'm super glad you were able to learn and grow from it, tho! pretty much every one of them went to jail anyway, even if the offense didn't call for jail time bc they'd be held in contempt for not stopping their schpiel when the judge asked them to stop talking.
@@misstiredeyes Thank you! Yeah, the end result being jail was my mom's experience as well. When I was a kid, I thought there was more to what my mom was trying to do that I didn't understand, but, now that I'm older, I realize there was nothing more to get. Everything she was doing and attempting to do was as dumb as I thought it was as a kid.
I am so happy that you escaped that toxic system. I'm sorry it took so much work, but welcome to the majority where things are a lot calmer.
It’s like when kids play tag and one kid gets salty when they’re caught so they suddenly proclaim that they’re in a safe zone and no touch backs are allowed of a sudden. 😂
Me and some friends collectively agreed that If you do that even ONCE your out of the game no matter what or we will just go after you very rarely😂😂😂
😂😂 that's such a perfect way to describe it, especially after having heard this dude tell the cop that he "broke the law" 😂😂
The blatant disregard for that baby's safety from the parents is disgusting....
YES!
Pulling out a knife during a traffic stop the way she did till typically get you guns pointed at you by the police, and very possibly shot. Thankfully the police knew about the baby before she tried that. In any case, she put that baby in unnecessary danger by doing that.
A peaceful person is NEVER responsible for violence POLICE put on them. If she was in danger of being shot for NOT rushing at them or making threats, then the cop was fucking up. Period.
@@ashkebora7262And here they come.
@@ashkebora7262
"Peaceful people" don't have violence put on them by the police. The *MAJORITY* of cases where a police officer has to use force, or as you choose to say "violence, the person they are using force against was being violent first, or putting other people in danger in some manner. If people don't break the law, they don't get arrested.
Before anybody says something dumb like, "You've clearly never been in this situation."... I've been arrested, and have spent plenty of time in jail, and it's because, I was BREAKING THE LAW. The police had every right to arrest me. My windows have never been busted out, and they've never beat the hell out of me, because I followed their *lawful* orders.
Even the Amish people don't call themselves sovereign citizens and they act more like it than most of these people. Having and driving a vehicle is not a right but a privilege. How difficult is that for people to understand?
America is a land of rich geniuses and the dumbest poor people on Earth.
Insanely hard when your average person doesn't care about the world outside of their subjective experience. The same reason the US can't elect a real leader.
Because Americans are fuckin' stupid.
Idk most ppl can’t even afford to pay tabs let alone car insurance
I think the Amish is the closest thing to “sovereign” citizen but they even have IDs without photos …..
The craziest part of the Sovereign Citizen movement to me is that every single one of them that goes to court and tries this crap in front of a judge loses. And all the others see that it doesn't work and STILL do it. If there was one shred of evidence that there was some validity to it and that it could be argued in court, I would understand, but there's nothing to back up their claims.
Human stupidity at its finest
Sadly enough of them "win" that these sovereign citizens think they're right. Really these cases are just getting dismissed bc the courts are too busy to be dealing with this silliness.
Not true! I have beat multiple charges using this method. There are only 3 laws do not steal or cause damage to property, don't murder/harm others and do not commit fraudulent contracts. Aside from that act, statutes, codes and edicts are not laws.
I guess their hope is that if enough people do it, eventually some exemption to the law will be added. Like how the Amish are allowed to let their horses shit all over the road, but if my dog shits on the sidewalk and I don't clean it up I can get fined lol
It only works on thing judge doesn’t have time to deal with.
If you get a speeding ticket or whatever, the judge will not want to deal with the antics.
But when it’s more serious, they have all the time in the world
it's like arguing with toddlers but at least most toddlers can understand after explaining two three times lol
So they're toddlers sans logic. That tracks.
Or at worst they give up after holding their breath doesn’t work
As soon as the dude was in handcuffs, he was backpedeling so fast!
Sovereign Citizens should never be taken seriously.
The woman: "we weren't diving"
The dude a minute later: "can she drive the truck?"
The lady was holding the baby in her lap instead of a carrier, plus pulling out that knife instead of just giving a verbal answer, that family is doomed bruh
Hate to say it, but child protective services seriously needs to look into this lady. Pulling a knife out while holding a baby during a traffic stop can put that baby in a LOT of danger.
Those comments by the cop say it all: oh he's a sovereign citizen
Love how he's probably just racking up them pissed off cop charges
Haha so funny when cops make fun of people for trying to make use of their rights
@@justintroy1196his rights weren't violated
@@justintroy1196it is funny 😂
@@justintroy1196it’s hilarious because they’re trying to say they have rights that aren’t real
I met one irl and i swear we all would disassociate whenever he spoke lmfao my mom wouldnt let me tell him how stupid it was
Was he family?
lmfao your mom is TOO kind dude loololololo
sometimes if u can actually make people realize how stupid they are its best for themself, but i have given up lol
Because your mom knows arguing with them is a fool’s game. She might even have already had this circle-jerk conversation with them.
You won’t win.
They won’t WANT to understand. An argument will ensue. You will get very angry. Save your angry for something else. (Dealers choice!)
However, I’m not saying you’re wrong. I don’t have patience for circle-jerk conversations with these people.
Mama shoulda' told you "you can't fix stupid, son"
@@chrisrichards2289 Momma didn't, but Ron White sure did
Worked for a major cell phone company. We'd get people trying to pay with a 10 page document, claiming under various treaties, this was a legal money order. Guess whose phone got turned off.
Those poor poor kids. What chance have they got in life with parents like that....
The sovereign citizen is honestly the funniest because a group of people just went “no! I’m not doing the law! I don’t have to!”
And they get smacked down every time
Why do they keep trying? Like has their ever been a situation where it worked? I'm assuming not.
@ Google “do sovereign citizens ever win in court?” The answer is NO 😂
As a former toddler, I can relate to that statement.
I feel like there has to be some loopholes that can be exploited by talking or writing legalese, it's basically the whole point of studying law.
13:09 Ngl, this cop is such a mood. 😂 There are a lot of problems with police in America, but I do enjoy the random cam vids that show a lotta cops are just regular dudes fed up with this shit.
I feel bad for the cop putting up with these guys, it feels like this wasn't the first Sovereign Citizen he had to deal with probably this month.
"We're common law" oh, so he wouldn't put a ring on it then? LOL
It's "Common Law", "Maritime Law", whatever. Statements like that convince me that they don't really understand what they're parroting.
@@CakeofWisdomcommon law marriage is recognized in like 20 states it's a real thing
Power struggle on the part of the cop, most cops become cops because they want to control and be bullies. She is using her gut instinct (which most people lack) and his aura is that of evil. I bet they aren’t religious which is what you both are assuming.
@@N1korasu I think the point is more kinda "why would common law matter to someone who claims to be a sovereign citizen"
“He put in T for traveling rather than D for drive” 😂😂 I can’t with you guys. Too damn funny
I used to work as a bank teller and we had one of these guys come in making a fuss constantly... all his mortgage payments were by checks, which he'd sign in red ink with "all rights reserved" under his signature, and stamp "void" on before using them for payments. My pathetic boss at the time preferred making me feel stupid over doing anything about this guy and yelled at me any time I brought it up. He constantly brought in huge bundles of paperwork for us to mail off to corporate too, which we were instructed to shred. It was infuriating.
Wow
They always say “I’m not driving, I’m traveling.” I know that everything they say is stupid, but to me, that is really stupid, I guess none of us are driving, we are all just a bunch of travelers 😂
So they wrongly equate something. There is a right to travel that is guaranteed in the US, and they quote some old Black's law dictionary to say if it's not for commerce, it's not driving. They fail to notice that no one is stopping their right to travel, as they can walk anywhere they want. That's why they stick all this "not for commerce" on their cars.
I can be weird myself a lot ... If they claim to be that much souvereign, they are free to travel ... as long as they get a travel visa everytime they want to leave their property. Thought that visa doesnt automaticly include their car. To operate a car outside of their souvereingnity, they still need a valid drivers licence and insurance for the car.
I'm not running officer, I'm in rapid motion
In their imaginary world, "driving" is when you are doing it as a job or as a commercial activity.
My favorite cop response to a sovereign citizen was something along the lines of "I'm not a citizen of Canada but if I go there and use their roads I still have to follow their traffic laws. If you are using an American road you have to follow those traffic laws"
I don't understand what they dont understand about the fact that you can be as sovereign as you want but when you leave your property and come on to American land you have to follow the law. If you travel to another country you have to get a license to drive there. On top of the fact that constitutional rights only to American Citizens in most cases. You literally don't have rights to anything if you don't acknowledge the government that outlined those rights.
This!! I also feel like if cops started saying "Ok sir/ma'am you're telling me you're not a citizen or holder of a visa that grants you access to the United States? Uh oh buddy, time to deport you" these sovereign people would suddenly be all "oh no sir I'm a citizen of America!!" 😂
Like I'm not one for deporting people randomly but goddamn
Same if you live in a country. If you reside in a country, you have to follow that country's laws.
Sadly we do have some of these numb nuts up here in Canada as well. Some tried it at the Windsor-Sarnia border years ago and you can imagine how well that went over with US Customs. They were arrested and their car confiscated. And they recorded their idiocy as well. Play stupid games with law enforcement and win stupid prizes like an arrest.
not even when they leave their property, the US like most countries, have land ownership as more of a license to use as you please while you pay property taxes. Laws are not invalidated when you are on your property.
@@theythemgae9025 do they say citizen of America? America isn't a country, it's a continental group.
@@liamnehren1054 We have to say we're North American here in Canada because if you say you're American, it means you're from the USA. And believe me, we don't want to be lumped in with them.
It's like one person got a thesaurus and thought "if I change the words then the law doesn't apply!" It's the same as saying "I didn't steal it, I permanently borrowed it with no plans on returning it"
See I always said the only way to defeat these guys is to thesaurus them back to their original meanings.
having a thesaurus helps a lot because similar words can be identical in meaning but have different connotations/denotations (ex: house vs. home) and that's great for deciphering intentions ... but they need to know replacing a keyword with a bunch of identical meanings is not gonna get you out of jail lol
honestly, in my opinion, if you're accusing someone of stealing and they keep saying everything identical except for the actual word, it seems more guilty than anything...
I don't know, I would kind of think First Nations have a legimate right to say that and might have a very different notion of "borrowing things with no plans on returning it".
Sovereign Citizens when called out for being a Sovereign Citizen will deny it.
You guys are great!! I have a co-worker at my job who is a sovereign citizen and some of the stuff they spout makes me just shake my head and walk away. I can 100% relate to these cops reactions.
I literally just felt some brain cells fizzle and die at the end when it said the vehicle was "registered to him and his wife"!!!
Good lord 😵😖
I think he admitted he didn't understand what he was saying and pulled all his info from a UA-cam video. It kind of seems to me like its the wifes idea and the husband just went along with it.
Remember when Buggs Bunny sawed off Florida and it floated out into the ocean?
*Welcome to Floriduuuhhhhhh*
@@The_Crucible714I reference this every time someone tells me something crazy about Florida.
i think cops experienced the same but x1000 🤣
@@The_Crucible714Is it one Hell of a drug?
They did not even say anything about her 'traveling' with the baby in her lap!!!!!
Sad part is thats the least of that kids problems.
That’s what I’m saying! Watch. They won’t be charged with child neglect. The courts coddle these idiots which just give them motivation to keep doing this! The courts need to throw the book at these idiots if they want to stop this.
Doesnt the word ever get back to the other sovereign citizens that this stuff doesn't work? Has anyone ever been travelling on the road with no license, and were let go by the police because they were a sovereign citizen.
Actually yes. Sometimes the cop decides it's not worth their time dealing with it.
The sovereign citizen argument has literally never worked in court. But these are the same people who are often flat earthers or anti vaxxers, so common sense is not very common among them.
Cousin and uncles are cops especially where the couple got picked up they don’t even let these people argue anything, they tell them that they are going to jail for driving without a license and a valid tag on the vehicle. Then tells them if they want to fight it they can with the judge……non of them have won a case.
How many times did flat earthers been proved wrong? Yet they still refuse to believe it's round.
I didn't scroll down and read your comment because I just wrote the same thing.
I have had to deal with these “people” before. THEY WILL HURT YOU!!!!
"I have a drivers license you guys!" THEN WHY WEREN'T YOU DRIVING
shoulda got her traveler's license
"im travelinf across my private property" You are on on a public road sir. Also they can at least charge them both for neglect or failure to have the baby in a car seat...Plus No tag, and they arent operating it....but they were driving it....
My brain hurts...
CPS really needs to be involved here. Not only for having the baby on her lap while driving. Her pulling out a knife while holding that baby during a police stop puts that baby in a LOT of potential danger. Normally pulling a knife out on the police will at minimum result in them pointing their guns at you, and often worse.
@chad3232132 Exactly
I love when Dane goes “nah uh!” It’s one of my favorites 😂 his flabbers were gasted.
Just like Shakira. What a shame
Getting called an idiot by a sovereign citizen is comedic gold
We had someone claim independence in Australia once, they got to find out about import/export tax and a whole bunch of other annoying shit.
Good lord, the combination of a Floridian and a Sovereign Citizen 🤦♀️
"As a Free Man of the Land of Florida, it is my right to feed meth to the alligators at Disney world."
😂😂😂😂
“He wasn’t driving his car he was moving his personal property”
How? Semantics doesn’t get you outta crimes! Terrible people!
I wonder if he used white out on the gear shift. T for travel and not D for drive
I'm not robbing that bank. Such a strong word. I'm transferring these bags of cash from one place to another.
I mean, it does if you're rich.
@@KirillT14 True. There are many billionaires that have ideas to build “planned communities” so they don’t have to pay taxes or follow certain laws. They fail at planning because they don’t realize that SOMEONE has to maintain their infrastructure, clean, cook, settle disputes etc and they’re not going to do any of it!
They despise the working class while demanding they be served. Unfortunately the working class applaud that thinking they’ll be joining them one day or they’ll be kept as pets. Even though they brag about being able to fire people who try to advocate for better pay.
"I'm not driving I'm traveling"
That has to do with Boating! LOL
Not driving.
I'm not showering. I'm just rinsing off.
I'm not a psychic, I'm a psycho.
Traveling.... By driving a car...
I’m not moving. I’m running.
Refuses to follow basic instructions and produce registration and identification, then blames the cops for the consequences of those actions. Man still would have been ticketed or possibly arrested for driving without a license, but if she had been driving, and they had produced registration and identification up front, all of this could have been avoided 🤦🏼♀
Oh NOOOOO!!!! My husband's actions have consequences, and do do mine. Her teaching her children that police officers are bad people is insane. You should NEVER make children *FEAR* the police. All that will do is ensure that they don't ask them for help when they actually need them.
Me, if I was a cop: "I have an aura? Nice, we are matching, you have an aurest"
yea I should not be a cop
You *_S H O U L D_* be a cop
I’d much rather a cop make bad puns to an arrestee than like… what usually gets reported
Gonna be o-wested!
😂 O-Cawd
@@CaseyAvalon nice!!
I saw one in the wild once, you could tell by the "license plate" on the car. It was a weird reference to a state legal statute, and when I looked it up it was a generic law about property ownership. Turns out that sovcits in my state like to think that this law means they don't have to have their vehicles registered to drive them on the road.
Lmfaooo “in the wild” took me out
I saw one once too! I was super excited it was like winning a scavenger hunt or something lol
@@KatMo126 same 😂😂
@@AmbassadorKat I’ve never seen one, but to be fair, I’d very likely act the same way if I ever do. 🤣🤣
"He put it in T-mode!" is absolutely killing me LMAO
She’s worse than he is. Those poor children have to be raised in that environment. They don’t stand a chance.
What's funny is today my coworker was bragging about being a sovereign citizen 😂 💯 that conversation didn't age well 😂
The main thing I don't understand about SC is that even if you acknowledge you're sovereign citizenship
You're still operating under another country's rules and are subject to those laws/penalties/punishments
Can anyone explain that?
They are basically knit picking several laws, many of which are still “technically” on the books, but overwritten by others to get to the outcome they want. Like a big chunk of it comes from combining maritime law with some of the earliest laws of the United States to get the sovereign part. The right to travel is from a Supreme Court case that said traveling is a fundamental right of humans, but they leave out the part where that same case adds “there are conditions the government can restrict it like if you are a criminal or if you are traveling to a war zone”, because that case was concerning a commie who wanted to go to a communist country in the 60s(I think) and the government kept rejecting his passport. Supreme Court said he had a right to travel there and can’t refuse him solely on “we don’t like there are a lot of communists there”, so that’s where they are getting this. It’s only concerning international travel. I don’t remember the exact “commercial vehicle” case, but it had something to do with a simple regulation stating you needed to be licensed to engage in commerce I believe, so they are trying to say since that one case said you need to be licensed to transport goods to sell, that means nobody else needs a license. I looked it up because I hate the government as much as next man, and would like it all to be true, but it’s basically stupid people thinking they can outsmart the government.
So, at least from a philosophical standpoint, it's not actually possible to explain. Their, oh let's call it an "interpretation" of laws are inherently self-contradictory. Just for fun, I once tried to trace out how they rationalize everything and it just gave me a headache. So, short version, I don't think it's possible to explain. The people who buy into this like hearing it and are convinced that they have these rights and don't recognize that, no matter what, the state is obviously not going to grant their arguments.
Diplomatic immunity, I guess.
@@Dragondan1987 I always like when they cite the Articles of Confederation, which was nullified once the Constitution was signed into being.
The biggest thing that makes me think these people aren't the brightest is that even foreign visitors can be held responsible for breaking the law in the US. How can they think that they won't be held responsible living in the US?
No mater your nationality and your status, you need to obey the laws of the place where you are currently in. That goes both way.
"How can they think ..."
Exactly! They're _not_ thinking. They only confirm their bias, no thinking involved.
nah illegals in democrat run areas are protected due to the diapers in chief. this will change when the Adult comes in Jan 6th 2025
@@Kualinar what do you mean both ways? does the place you're currently in need to obey your laws? D:
The fear in the officers voice when she pulled that knife... So scary, the trama that would've come from shooting a woman carrying a baby is beyond horrific. So glad they handled that as well as they did.
ROFL, "I'm not arresting you, I'm traveling you to jail" XD
There are loopholes where you don't need a license, plates, or registration to operate a motor vehicle and travel, but once you get on a public roadway, they dissapear.
These sovereign citizens hate following rules and paying taxes, but they sure love the benefits of a stable society. Benefits like grocery stores and having a landmine-free road to transport their personal property on.
i saw this compilation yesterday and said “eh i wanna watch some ken not any body cams today just not the vibe” then this morning right as i wake up to ready myself for work im greeted with a reaction from ken and buff and not only is it body cam, its SOVEREIGN CITIZENS, the best of the best, the greatest entitlement filled videos ever
They act like they are riding a dang bus... you're the driver, you're no longer just traveling, you are the conductor of the vehicle which you need a license for in every single state.
A lot of them go by an outdated version of "Black's Law Dictionary", where the word "employed" is used in an older way meaning just doing something. Like I'm "employed in taking a dump". They figure being "employed driving" is commercial, needs a license but private travel does not. They also misinterpret the right to travel. It is conditional for operating a motor vehicle. It means you cannot be restricted from crossing state borders.
My ex went full sovcit in child support court recently. It was HILARIOUS. The decision came down last week. Guess what? He still owes me the $65K he never paid during our daughter's childhood, even though she's in her 20's now. Doofus thought if he avoided it till she grew up, it would just go away. 😆
This poor cops patience was truly being tested. He sounded so frustrated, I feel so bad for him.
Trying to talk to a sovereign citizen is basically the same as a flat earther. They never listen and spurt all kinds of nonsense. And they find one example and they usually stick to that 1 example.
"I live in Waldo"
Kudos to the officers who resisted saying, "Where's Waldo?"
There’s a Waldo, Maine-maybe that’s what they meant? Ugh, that means they might live in my state 🤦🏻♀️
Never mind, I might have heard Florida mentioned-phew!
As a resident of central Florida, I can confirm that we have a Waldo. @@virgofairy88
It would be so funny (but unproffesional) for the cops to say “oke i”ll bite where’s waldo?” I would have cried on the floor from laughing xD.
Buying paperwork online - $200
Getting bonded out after finding out the paperwork is BS - $5000
Getting into court and us having content - no price to high xD.
"Any guns in the car?"
"Like this one? Points gun at cops"
😂
Did the police ever say anything about the child not being in a car seat???
Nope!
Right????? How is that legal? Well, it’s Floriduh! 🤦♀️
@@jenshaw8085 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I really am not cool with the way she did that
Right? Does FL not require babies and small children to be in car seats?
People like this are insufferable.
You know, I don't want to pay taxes on tags, and licenses, and whatnot... so I don't drive, and I pay people that can legally drive gas money.
Same.
The ol' sovereign passenger's trick, huh?
@littlefurrow2437 I still carry my ID everywhere lol I just don't have the money to be spending on insurance, tags, inspections, and maintenance. The expense list goes on, and I'm poor
@@ChyPearce me too! Probably coz of driving expenses. It's worse in Australia.
@littlefurrow2437 I believe that for sure! I'm just in the US; all my money goes towards medical expenses (crohns)
My takeaway is she is the brains of this duo and has somehow convinced him of this Sovereign Citizen malarkey. The way he is pleading and she's just letting him take the fall while being snarky.... She's the one they should lock up.
When I first started watching body cams of sovcit confrontations, you could tell the police were perplexed. “Traveling not driving… _what_ ?” “I don’t know, Sarge, he’s saying something about maritime law… yeah… yeah… no idea, sarge.”
In a bit less than a year we’ve progressed to, “Oooohh, it’s a sovereign citizen. Goddamnit.”
Sovereign citizens are the worst type of Karen
That cop's reaction is so real 😂😂😂
My favorite form of Schadenfreude
Oh I love that word!
Police body cam footage always makes me feel better about myself when I’m having a bad day or week. As does Chris Hansen.
correct me if im wrong but isnt that the "im fucking happy i aint those idiots" feeling?
Instead of shcadenfraude, I read up on Maslow's Heirarchy and heard a reference to type of humour self-activating minded people have. They like to laugh at human failings and attempts to do things beyond human capability, or failed systems. Like a dead deer in the pool don't know why that on made me laugh.
I thought I had some schedenfeude but I just think it's silly when plans don't work out
Its basically taking joy in other peoples misfortunes @@patrickbang3037
Yes. You are allowed to “travel” anywhere you wish in the United States, per the Constitution. You may: 1. Enter and leave any State. 2. Treated as a visitor in those states. 3. To be treated like any other citizen, and be treated as a resident if you move there. THAT'S IT. That's the “Travel Clause” in the Constitution. It's Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1. It's easy to look up.
The one of the reasons for this clause was to prevent States from limiting access to resources, for example, limiting medical care to ONLY citizens of their state.
This clause would be associated with the Fourteenth Amendment concerning Citizenship, so everyone who is a citizen is treated the same, state to state.
It's the 10th Amendment that allows States to create laws about Driver's Licenses, Registration of Vehicles (plates).
There's no logic here. Even as a "traveler", you still have to follow the laws of the country you are in. If I go to Singapore and start chewing gum and get caught, I'm gonna get in trouble.
As someone from Washington State, she can stay in Florida; we don't want her. And Amish, Mennonite, and native rez are sovereign, but they don't do any of that nonsense. These people have too much time on their hands to act up like this.
I’m just surprised they didn’t call CPS putting their children in that situation
That baby is guilty by association!😂 8:47
Locking him just cuz the others 😂😂sorry little baby gotta go
8:37 the cackle that came out of me having watched this train wreck already and knowing what's coming 💀🤣
Watching you two react to this madness absolutely made my day.
If you need to move your truck and you don't have a licence, they have a special bigger truck that you can put your truck on the back of. Then somebody with a DRIVERS LICENCE can move the truck for you
Love how the "Sovereign Citizen" little info blip changed for Ken's video afte rhe struggled to say that one word. 😂
The way I was just watching a police cam video like this when this popped up. I think the, errrm, lady in question will be featured in this video too 😂
"I'm traveling in my private property." Yes, on our PUBLIC roads.
The thing upsets me the most is that she thinks she can just drive away while holding a baby.. no car seat no drive. She should definitely be arrested too for endangering that child
Certainly fined.
Irwin Hitler there. Very small manhood.
After pulling out a knife while holding that baby during a traffic stop, which can easily get a person show by the police. Really hope child protective services looks into this.
I actually live about 5 minutes from Waldo.
They picked the WORST place to be dealing with cops. Florida cops are rough, but Waldo is a whole new ball game.
Waldo cops will pull you over if they see a passenger holding a phone, vaping, or if you're going 1mph over the speed limit.
You don't mess around with Florida cops, let alone Waldo cops
That knife could have gotten him some serious jail time btw, they let him off easy. Largest concealed carry knife you can have has to be a folding knife and less than a 4 inch blade. Machetes are any blade that has a larger edge than 4 inches. This is legally classified as a machete.
These people are braindead.
And a machete is classified as a tool
Which you could still get arrested for. Florida doesn't joke around with concealed carry laws. You'd need a permit for it even if it's a "tool"
Where's waldo?
@@David.Daileyso are Sovereign Citizens
Been through waldo quite a few times and she is definatly a full time waldo resident
16:37 "Can she drive the truck?"
If I were that cop, I would've been a smartass and said,
"No, but she can travel in it."
She’s from Washington state. Where common law also isn’t recognized 😂
Is common law recognized anywhere in the US? I remember when they did away with it where I live, my aunt and her partner were married under common law and they made a huge deal of it when it was no longer a thing. I always assumed they were grandfathered in but I didn't care to look into it further for them. I was just glad they did away with common law because if I wanted to marry my long time partner I would have
@@heatherchisholm89 it's recognized in like seven states but if you have property/assets or just travel out of that state it's no longer recognized
@marynoble9464 huh, interesting. Thank you for the info
I think this is an example of some people who honestly believe they have found a useable loophole in the law.
Has any one of these jackasses EVER uploaded a video where they pulled this "I'm travelling and I'm exempt from your laws" shit, and the cop turned round and said, "Oh... sorry sir, my mistake... your semi-constitutional paperwork all checks out... away you go, about your business! You have a nice day now!"
Ever?
5:00 that was the most clean coordinated window break ive ever seen a cop do. Ive seen videos of cops using their elbows and even their fist, punching the windows, not many that use these easy tools
I know my rights! Also im not a citizen of your country! 😂😂😂
The exasperation and doneness in the officer's voice when he learns the person's a SC 😂
"he's not operating a motor vehicle"
That woman just killed more of my braincells then a shot of whiskey.
In all 50 states you must have license, registration and insurance, in no state is your car part of your household goods
These people literally try to cause a problem. Maybe that's the only way their parents gave them any attention
@@dingushasacamera8379 they think if they yell loud enough the police will hand them a Snickers and go away
The car was registered and she had a license 😂
All that AND holding a small baby in the front seat. SMH
That was made illegal because of the conservation of momentum law, which ofcourse also doesn't apply to them
Yoooo! That woman is WILD!! Are you kidding me? “You’re an idiot. I don’t like you. Let me in my truck. That’s how moronic you guys are” swinging a knife around…like wtf? How she didn’t get tased, arrested, etc. is CRAZY!! People have most definitely been killed by police for soooo much less. Omg I hated this whooole thing. Please, please God don’t ever let me meet any one of these types of people in the wild. This is so unbelievable
She still has the baby they don't want her to fall on the kid or drop them and then have a medical emergency at best
I sincerely hope these children grow up and become the opposite of their parents good lord.
This is not how you treat royalty and foreign dignitaries traveling through your jurisdiction.
YAYAY THANK YOU FOR THE BDAY WISH! Finally i get my turn!!!!!! Thank you for making today special you guys!
Happy Bday!!! 🎂🎂
@ thank you🥰!
Happy birthday 🥳🎉
Happy Bday man
Of course you're special, fren
Cops the whole episode: completely flabbergasted 😂
Casual reminder that you can have a healthy and reasonable distrust of authority without acting like a toddler caught with their hand in the cookie jar. You're not gonna do anything but stack charges by arguing with cops, deal with it in court with legal representation.
Exactly. You shouldn't trust authority and cops definitely aren't your fuckin friends.
But don't ever go full sovcit
The most common argument for the right to travel on a SCOTUS ruling from 1925 called Thompson v Smith. They quote the first lines of the decision and ignore the two more that follow it. Here is the full text.
“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right in doing so to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day; and under the existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purposes of life and business.
The exercise of such a common right the city may, under its police power, regulate in the interest of the public safety and welfare... The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions."
When you read the full text is clearly supports the legality of driver's licenses.
They will also point to Black's Law Dictionary 2nd edition published on 1910 which defines as a driver as someone using s motor vehicle for commerce. That is because in 1910 New York was the only state that issued licenses and that only for commercial vehicles. The first private licenses where not invented until 1913. And held to constitutional on 1915 Hendrick v Maryland.
I often find sovereign citizens too frustrating to watch, but having you guys comment and laugh at them makes it endlessly entertaining.
I just feel so so sad for the kids. Their parents are so messed up. They just wanted to go to the beach. So sad that parents can’t pull themselves together for their kids
(5:45) While most of us were renewing our plates, he studied the blade.
😂