Hey man I don’t know if you’ll respond but I’m currently looking to buy a monitor but I don’t know what herts means does it increase your FPS or what I’d rlly appreciate if you could help me out!
@@coleslaughter4034 hz means that if u have 60hz monitor and ur getting 120 fps U will only see 60 fps U cant see 120fps cz fps means frames per second And hz means how many times a screen refreshes in 1 sec So the number of hz a monitor has its the number of frames (fps) it can display 😀😀
So if I have a computer that can display 60 frames per second and I have a 120hz monitor I won’t get the full benefits of the monitor so I should upgrade my computer?
@Pogmaster dude you know hz is the refresh rate of the screen so if it’s processing 60 FPS on a 240hz monitor it will still look like 60hz or 60fps since it only has to refresh 60fps
Yeah but the clip is still at 120 (and more) fps/hz. So, the clip still seems smoother. It's the same thing with FPS and Hz on a normal monitor . Even if your screen/monitor can only output at a certain refresh rate, it would still benefit from higher fps because of the updated information. The newer information from the latest frame would be shown on the next Hz rather than the frame that would've been shown at a lower FPS. That last part probably didn't make sense but you get my point. Lol.
Great, now every 7 year old is gunna start asking their parents for s 360hz monitor, cuz they think they're gunna get as good as u. (This *IS* A JOKE) great vid, u got a new sub
I got a 60hz monitor right now and I can tell you, it's a PRETTY big difference from 60hz to 144hz, but in the end, It doesn't affect me much. 144hz feels buttery smooth but 60hz is more than enough if you want to game and feels very nice.
It's almost impossible to notice the difference between 120 and 144 hz, as that's only a few ms and a few extra frames (6 more frames per reaction time (250 ms), though it's a bit better than this for pros). Most pros will struggle with that tiny jump, which is akin to 240 to 360 hz jump -- though this jump will be better and a lot smoother. Pointless for non-pros. Here is a quick breakdown without getting too technical about all the specs/figures/frame-generations, etc. 30-60 hz: notable difference for average gamer on first-person shooters, etc. Tiny jump for typical gaming, though it is much smoother, which indirectly aids in gameplay. Pros will notice a massive difference, however. This is also one of the biggest jumps you will find. Jumps get smaller, not bigger (unless jumping directly from 30). Interesting, this only adds 7 frames per reaction time (average at 250 ms), but this makes the biggest standard difference because it massively cuts down the time to frame-generation. More frames means more smoothness, but you cannot always use those frames for raw gameplay as the time is too small for your reaction times. 30-120+ hz: The biggest possible jump, extremely notable even for non-pros on random games, more so simracing. 60-120 hz: Fairly big jump, but not as good as 30-60, which means it's pretty pointless for typical gaming and non-pros, unless you're playing simracing and/or high-level first-person shooters. The real cut-off point for average gaming is about 75 hz, as it happens. 60-144 hz: A big jump, around equal to 30-60. So, that means, it's the same kind of improvement, though this offers more frames, so it will be much smoother, the time to frame-generation is tiny, and all animation is smooth at this point (and most games are made for 60 hz, anyway), all of this meaning that it's a tiny jump for non-pros or non-first-person shooters. The max for typical gaming is about 75, and the max for simracing is about 120 hz (unless a pro). The max for typical first-person shooters is about 144 unless you're a pro. 60-240 hz: About the same as 30-120. One of the biggest jumps, but not as big as some of the others, as it turns out. It's also pointless for non-pros/non-first-person shooters, because the gameplay is too slow to use it, and your reaction times are not good enough to use it. But, again, 240 hz will be extremely smooth and life-like, though it won't directly help much with raw gameplay over 144 hz (but it will still be better than 60 hz for non-pros, you just don't need post-144 hz). If you watch the 1000 FPS slowed-down Counter Strike footage, you see that 144 hz is very close to 240, and that 240 is akin to real life which makes post-240 hz/FPS pointless. 240-360 hz: A tiny jump, equal to about 120-144 hz, only used by pros and first-person shooters. Pretty pointless given that games are really only made for 60 hz and native 360 hz doesn't really exist yet. Test subjects report tiny jump. And, sinceit's post-240 hz, which is akin to real-life motion, it means 360 hz won't be much faster or smoother to the naked eye for most people, anyway. Naturally, this makes post-360 hz completely pointless on current software/hardware, and will only be useful in the far-future when games are made natively at 240 hz, and they become really cutting-edge, pro-level, and beyond fast-paced. You really only need 240 hz for pros and VR (assuming equal or greater FPS). Tests show that humans cannot detect post-240 FPS, for example, as it just becomes 'real-life motion' to the naked eye. But, it will still prove useful for certain things and games and settings. But, naturally, not worth the cost, and only shows a tiny improvement. P.S. 30 hz is 33.3 ms per frame-generation, 60 hz is 16.6 ms, and 75 hz is 13.3 ms. That's why 30-60 is such a large jump, though still not needed for Nintendo type games. 75 hz is a cut-off point for this very reason: it takes a human 13.3 ms to 'see' an entire image, according to MIT testing. This means, at 90+ hz, you cannot even see the entire frame, but you can see the smoothness of the collection of frames, and can see have enough time for micro-adjustments, which is why 90+ hz is a must for pros, and rapid games like Call of Duty. At 120 hz, you are around the cut-off point for the average brain to even notice anything (8 ms). That's why 120 hz is the cut-off point for simracing, and other gaming. It's impossible for the average gamer to even tell the difference between 1 and 8 ms, though pros can. That's why the response time of modern TVs and monitors is anywhere from 1 to 8 ms. You only need 2-5 ms response time on monitors, though pros opt for 1 ms for 240 hz and max output. You don't even need 1 ms response time monitors (and the brain cannot process sub-1 ms). In theory, this means the brain can deal with 1000 FPS/hz at max (equal to 1 ms of time in frame-generation), as this is how long it takes for your myelinated nerves to fire. But, for standard gameplay, 240 hz is the limit currently as it's akin to real-life motion, and most games are innately limited to 60 hz animation. There is much more to say, but the point is that post-240 hz is useless for non-pros, and for 90% of games.
@@dqlepy You can use an external camera and record the monitor at different refresh rates and slow *that* footage down to show the change in response times to give a better representation than show in the video
Your not getting a new screen to watch everything in slow motion the only way to tell the difference is but seeing it in action and if you don’t notice any difference then it doesn’t matter between the hz
I feel like 240 to 360 wouldn’t really be a difference but in end game I definitely think 360 would make a HUGE difference but in creative I don’t think 240 to 360 would feel any better
everything past 60hz in this video isn't what it says it is, it's still only 60hz, but I upgraded from a 60hz monitor to a 144hz monitor, and my KD in all the games i play nearly doubled, it really does make a huge difference.
For now, it won't make a different since there aren't good enough graphics card to average every single game in the world with 360fps+ and with every resolution
240 to 360 would NEVER be a big difference unless you're a pro and/or playing first-person shooters. It's impossible for you to notice as an average gamer. It's a proven fact that people cannot really detect post-240 hz/FPS according to scientific testing and studies, and that 240 range is akin to 'real-life motion' (as proven via the 1000 FPS slowed-down Counter Strike footage), which makes post-240 pretty pointless for most gaming. Further, early test subjects reported that there was a slight improvement between 240 and 360, but not major. One of the reasons is that the time to new frame-generation is so small with 360 hz that you cannot process it and use it, even most pros would struggle to use 360 hz. There are many extra frames, though, so 360 would most likely look slightly smoother across gameplay (many frames). It's like the difference between 4k and 8k on a standard screen size: pretty much no difference at all for 90% of the game. Not worth the cost, and pointless for most games/gamers.
If you set it to 144 hZ thru Windows and set Fortnite to 60 FPS, then Fortnite will show 60 FPS. You just can't have Fortnite's FPS higher than the Windows hZ setting for your monitor.
Since UA-cam uploads videos on 60fps, it's hard to tell the difference unless you.have played on different fps. I have never tried 360 hz before, but I have tried up to 240 fps and there is a massive difference between 240 and 30
If you record in 120fps plus, it looks smoother because your eyes are tricking you into seeing more frames when you actually aren't because UA-cam FPS limit.
@@kxiju8531 lmao that’s completely incorrect, if you record at a framerate higher than 60 fps you can render it in a software like vegas pro and it creates blur frames which are multiple frames blended into one, i dont know exactly how it works but recording at 120fps will give you 2 blur frames and 240 will give you 4. It doesnt have anything to do with placebo
My problem is I’m on a budget with an older system so getting high fps at 1440p is gonna be hard for my pc which is why I’ve been using a 1080p 75hz monitor
This is honestly helpful because I have been thinking about getting a monitor but, it only had 180Hz and I did not know if that would provide gaming experiences I wanted. After watching his I feel like for the price of it I will be satisfied buying it!
@@zacharycaruso3892 because i think 165hz is enough man, you dont have to have something to know that its too much, you can assume that you dont need a 240hz monitor if you have a 165hz monitor, do you understand now??
My friends at school are so dum they say they have $1000 fps on Fortnite yes there pc can probably run that but they don’t make monitors good enough yet
You will also need a monitor with a high refresh rate, if you buy a 60hz monitor u will only be able to run 60fps with your pc. A good monitor is a 140hz to 240hz monitor to run high fps with your pc
@@a7phy219 yup, ik all of this, but thanks. I am just lokking for a pc that can run 1080p@60 for now... possibly build of intel i7 10700 or i5 11600/11400 + (integrated graphics) 8GB 3200mhz Ram + H410M (for intel i7 10700) or Asrock b560 Pro4 (for i5 11th gen) etc... I am not gonna get a GPU yet ... too pricey
@@Ilovevenom575 it’s so hard for me to play fortnite, because I have a 6700xt and for some reason the fps are just absolutely horrible on 1080p and 1440p even tho they aren’t at max
i didnt know 60hz from 144 was so much of a diffrence it feels smoth less delay and looks like butter, but since yt makes videos 60fps its harder to see so we would have to feel it for our selfs.
I've been playing on 60hz for 8 years, I just got a pc that can easily handle my new 540hz monitor on fortnite, and I am never going back to 60hz for a second.
I think 144hz monitor is just enough, you can play anything smoothly with just 60hz or even 144hz. my monitor is Asus VG27aq and it was pretty nice monitor.
I have a question, I have a gaming laptop acer aspire 7 rtx 3050 144hz when i play fortnite im supposed to get 144 fps and above right? but i get 70 80 and 90 fps maximum on stretch screen and low settings is that like normal or not if not how do i fix it what do i do
When comparising the video needs to be slow down to 1000 Frames to see a difference. 360hz can be easily seen that it is very smooth in motion. Every 1 - 2 ms will be a new picture. at 240 it will be arround 4-5 ms
60 frames per second is 60 Hz in a second. 1 second equals 1000 milliseconds. 1000/60=(50/3=16(2/3)=16.6 ms 144Hz would be 1000/144=(125/18=6(17/18)=6.94 ms so 360hz would be 2.77 ms AND NOT your "every 1-2ms new picture". stop throwing around lies thx
So I just bought a 165hz monitor. Im pleased with it but higher hz monitors are very overrated. Definitely a noticeable difference but it's not all that great. I wouldn't go for 165hz or 240 or anything like that maybe stick to 120hz or 144hz even 75 is fine
@@marioduvi8643 its an asus monitor.. its not dogshit and yes i set up 165hz, im simply saying save a few bucks and go for 144hz, also the comment is 7 months old dude..
everyone complaining about watching it on a 60Hz monitor when the video quality literally only goes up to 60 anyway I'm on my 165Hz monitor and you can't see the difference other than 30 because of the quality.. so you're really not missing out guys
Help me to get 100k subscribers plz
Download FPS Boost Pack : rekonise.com/fps-boost-pack-mt4ms
Ok ❤️
I currently don’t have a gaming monitor, what monitors do you recommend for a first one. Thank you in advance 🙏
Hey man I don’t know if you’ll respond but I’m currently looking to buy a monitor but I don’t know what herts means does it increase your FPS or what I’d rlly appreciate if you could help me out!
@@coleslaughter4034 hz means that if u have 60hz monitor and ur getting 120 fps
U will only see 60 fps
U cant see 120fps cz fps means frames per second
And hz means how many times a screen refreshes in 1 sec
So the number of hz a monitor has its the number of frames (fps) it can display 😀😀
So if I have a computer that can display 60 frames per second and I have a 120hz monitor I won’t get the full benefits of the monitor so I should upgrade my computer?
Me watching this on a 60hz screen ..... Understandable
Stolen
@@rekrodakk5269 na
Xd
Im watching on a 120 hz screen
Yes 😂😂😂😂
I love how he wrote 360Hz and hes geting 270fps in the game
this has to be a joke
@Pogmaster dude you know hz is the refresh rate of the screen so if it’s processing 60 FPS on a 240hz monitor it will still look like 60hz or 60fps since it only has to refresh 60fps
He’s rendering it in 360 fps so it looks smoother as you go up
I don’t think he did that
Dam
Watching on a 60fps display:
INTERESTING
ahahah true
@1M4G1N34 you see a difference in editing tho? And how much smoother it is
@@RussVI yeah but that's no use to his viewers what he sees in editing
youtube is 60hz
@@p4edato567 we know
You can't see 120hz or higher because YT capped 60hz. OMG, I GOT 138 LIKES!
UA-cam cap video to 60hz but a 144 recording will be smoother than a 60 recording even on UA-cam 60 cap
@@dato6019 only if u record with fps tho
Yeah but the clip is still at 120 (and more) fps/hz. So, the clip still seems smoother.
It's the same thing with FPS and Hz on a normal monitor .
Even if your screen/monitor can only output at a certain refresh rate, it would still benefit from higher fps because of the updated information.
The newer information from the latest frame would be shown on the next Hz rather than the frame that would've been shown at a lower FPS.
That last part probably didn't make sense but you get my point. Lol.
@@benjaminrobledo5466 ok with you but the FPS should be a "multiplicator" to match with the he number right?
@@dato6019
Sorry? I didn't quite understand your question. Can you rephrase it please?
My eye hz just looking at this
Edit: Jesus Christ didn’t think my comment would blow up thx for the positivity :)
😂 underrates but you should say “my eyes hz just by looking at this” instead of hyz
Oh I see what you did there
i see what ya did there.
Bro u got the whole squad laughing
@@k1yoke1 bruh
Great, now every 7 year old is gunna start asking their parents for s 360hz monitor, cuz they think they're gunna get as good as u. (This *IS* A JOKE) great vid, u got a new sub
He Ins’t that good
@@yoham9586 u should shut ur mouth.
Btw my friends lil bro ask to buy my 360hz monitor for 30 euros 😂😂😂
@@raven6421 no
Tbh there isn’t much difference in my opinion between 240hz and 360hz but i guess you have to use it to properly see it so idk
We can hardly see that it's smoother when it's more than 60hz because youtube puts the video on 60hz....
Yep
Yeah but its rendered so it seems like its smoother, kinda like it has multiple frames in one
Fax
He didn’t have the green paper like us 💵💵
@RuggedComa hz means hertz and hertz are like frames per seconds but instead of frames per seconds it is how many times the monitor will change colors
I bought a 144hz and all I can say is that it’s a huge game changer.
Does it make edits faster when you are also on 60 fps???
@@jdq3760 No you need min 144 fps
Bro I got 144hz and I got li thousandth fps
@@BaggeraMain wait so your saying that even on 60 fps you play better and edit faster????
@@jdq3760 no wtf where’d you get that
me having a 75 hz display: interesting...
Me having 1 hz display : you gays have 75 hz?
@@Anshul_Singi gays?
@@moneynobaby i mean guys lol
i got 60 🤧
🤔🤔🤔🤔 interesting
Rip when you play on 30hz 😥
LOOOL
@@Leopard2a6_eq wow your laughing at him because he doesn’t have a fast display
@@Tom-dc7xz Yes.
The FreedomToons not cool
Lol fax
I got a 60hz monitor right now and I can tell you, it's a PRETTY big difference from 60hz to 144hz, but in the end, It doesn't affect me much. 144hz feels buttery smooth but 60hz is more than enough if you want to game and feels very nice.
Yeah i agree on the 60 hz thing
Hell i feel like 30 hz is more than enough
I disagree 165hz is would i have
@@plushie3276 there's legit no difference on 144 and 165
@@Baconator20000 There is a little bit difference i feel it.
In this case people can say no diff between 120 and 144 but its false
See fortnite is playable in higher ranks even in 60-70 fps but a game like valorant u at least need to have 144 hz or u are in a big disadvantage
30hz - 0:00 60hz - 0:54
120hz - 2:02 144hz - 3:10
165hz - 4:48 240hz - 5:12
360hz - 6:24
Your Welcome!!!
This vid is trash anyways.
It's almost impossible to notice the difference between 120 and 144 hz, as that's only a few ms and a few extra frames (6 more frames per reaction time (250 ms), though it's a bit better than this for pros). Most pros will struggle with that tiny jump, which is akin to 240 to 360 hz jump -- though this jump will be better and a lot smoother. Pointless for non-pros.
Here is a quick breakdown without getting too technical about all the specs/figures/frame-generations, etc.
30-60 hz: notable difference for average gamer on first-person shooters, etc. Tiny jump for typical gaming, though it is much smoother, which indirectly aids in gameplay. Pros will notice a massive difference, however. This is also one of the biggest jumps you will find. Jumps get smaller, not bigger (unless jumping directly from 30). Interesting, this only adds 7 frames per reaction time (average at 250 ms), but this makes the biggest standard difference because it massively cuts down the time to frame-generation. More frames means more smoothness, but you cannot always use those frames for raw gameplay as the time is too small for your reaction times.
30-120+ hz: The biggest possible jump, extremely notable even for non-pros on random games, more so simracing.
60-120 hz: Fairly big jump, but not as good as 30-60, which means it's pretty pointless for typical gaming and non-pros, unless you're playing simracing and/or high-level first-person shooters. The real cut-off point for average gaming is about 75 hz, as it happens.
60-144 hz: A big jump, around equal to 30-60. So, that means, it's the same kind of improvement, though this offers more frames, so it will be much smoother, the time to frame-generation is tiny, and all animation is smooth at this point (and most games are made for 60 hz, anyway), all of this meaning that it's a tiny jump for non-pros or non-first-person shooters. The max for typical gaming is about 75, and the max for simracing is about 120 hz (unless a pro). The max for typical first-person shooters is about 144 unless you're a pro.
60-240 hz: About the same as 30-120. One of the biggest jumps, but not as big as some of the others, as it turns out. It's also pointless for non-pros/non-first-person shooters, because the gameplay is too slow to use it, and your reaction times are not good enough to use it. But, again, 240 hz will be extremely smooth and life-like, though it won't directly help much with raw gameplay over 144 hz (but it will still be better than 60 hz for non-pros, you just don't need post-144 hz). If you watch the 1000 FPS slowed-down Counter Strike footage, you see that 144 hz is very close to 240, and that 240 is akin to real life which makes post-240 hz/FPS pointless.
240-360 hz: A tiny jump, equal to about 120-144 hz, only used by pros and first-person shooters. Pretty pointless given that games are really only made for 60 hz and native 360 hz doesn't really exist yet. Test subjects report tiny jump. And, sinceit's post-240 hz, which is akin to real-life motion, it means 360 hz won't be much faster or smoother to the naked eye for most people, anyway. Naturally, this makes post-360 hz completely pointless on current software/hardware, and will only be useful in the far-future when games are made natively at 240 hz, and they become really cutting-edge, pro-level, and beyond fast-paced. You really only need 240 hz for pros and VR (assuming equal or greater FPS). Tests show that humans cannot detect post-240 FPS, for example, as it just becomes 'real-life motion' to the naked eye. But, it will still prove useful for certain things and games and settings. But, naturally, not worth the cost, and only shows a tiny improvement.
P.S. 30 hz is 33.3 ms per frame-generation, 60 hz is 16.6 ms, and 75 hz is 13.3 ms. That's why 30-60 is such a large jump, though still not needed for Nintendo type games. 75 hz is a cut-off point for this very reason: it takes a human 13.3 ms to 'see' an entire image, according to MIT testing. This means, at 90+ hz, you cannot even see the entire frame, but you can see the smoothness of the collection of frames, and can see have enough time for micro-adjustments, which is why 90+ hz is a must for pros, and rapid games like Call of Duty. At 120 hz, you are around the cut-off point for the average brain to even notice anything (8 ms). That's why 120 hz is the cut-off point for simracing, and other gaming. It's impossible for the average gamer to even tell the difference between 1 and 8 ms, though pros can. That's why the response time of modern TVs and monitors is anywhere from 1 to 8 ms. You only need 2-5 ms response time on monitors, though pros opt for 1 ms for 240 hz and max output. You don't even need 1 ms response time monitors (and the brain cannot process sub-1 ms). In theory, this means the brain can deal with 1000 FPS/hz at max (equal to 1 ms of time in frame-generation), as this is how long it takes for your myelinated nerves to fire. But, for standard gameplay, 240 hz is the limit currently as it's akin to real-life motion, and most games are innately limited to 60 hz animation. There is much more to say, but the point is that post-240 hz is useless for non-pros, and for 90% of games.
Bro..
Bro why did u type all that
Dude literally typer an essay just to prove like a few ppl wrong 💀💀💀💀
bros excluding 165hz
edit: btw respect for writing all that.. u basically explained and answered every question
I jumped from 30 to 144 about a year ago
I'm getting a 165 now
me: Mom i want 360hz monitor
mom: we have a monitor at home
monitor at home: 0:09
@@Durion7 there is 45 hz i swear
360 minus the 6 in the middle lol
the fact that i don't see anthing wrong in it confirms am broke 🥺💔
@@Durion7 nope I’ve seen some 30 hz displays
This would have been a decent video had the footage been slowed down 6x, that way you can actually tell the difference between 360hz and E.g. 60hz
@Chazdog you can, but you cannot upload more than 60fps because of youtube's limitations
Yeah it needs to be slowed to try to representate how 360fps would look like
@@dqlepy You can use an external camera and record the monitor at different refresh rates and slow *that* footage down to show the change in response times to give a better representation than show in the video
Your not getting a new screen to watch everything in slow motion the only way to tell the difference is but seeing it in action and if you don’t notice any difference then it doesn’t matter between the hz
@@0x00Fyou yeah there's many things you could do to show the BENEFIT that a high refresh rate monitor would net you
I feel like 240 to 360 wouldn’t really be a difference but in end game I definitely think 360 would make a HUGE difference but in creative I don’t think 240 to 360 would feel any better
everything past 60hz in this video isn't what it says it is, it's still only 60hz, but I upgraded from a 60hz monitor to a 144hz monitor, and my KD in all the games i play nearly doubled, it really does make a huge difference.
For now, it won't make a different since there aren't good enough graphics card to average every single game in the world with 360fps+ and with every resolution
240 to 360 would NEVER be a big difference unless you're a pro and/or playing first-person shooters. It's impossible for you to notice as an average gamer.
It's a proven fact that people cannot really detect post-240 hz/FPS according to scientific testing and studies, and that 240 range is akin to 'real-life motion' (as proven via the 1000 FPS slowed-down Counter Strike footage), which makes post-240 pretty pointless for most gaming. Further, early test subjects reported that there was a slight improvement between 240 and 360, but not major. One of the reasons is that the time to new frame-generation is so small with 360 hz that you cannot process it and use it, even most pros would struggle to use 360 hz. There are many extra frames, though, so 360 would most likely look slightly smoother across gameplay (many frames). It's like the difference between 4k and 8k on a standard screen size: pretty much no difference at all for 90% of the game. Not worth the cost, and pointless for most games/gamers.
240 to 360 is not noticable at all. unless in some very specific scenarios, you wont need a 360hz
@@yosteggasold that’s only because we are watching it at 60 hz correct?
fps is not hz. you have to manually switch the hz through windows setting or geforce control panel not through fortnite fps
If you set it to 144 hZ thru Windows and set Fortnite to 60 FPS, then Fortnite will show 60 FPS. You just can't have Fortnite's FPS higher than the Windows hZ setting for your monitor.
@@therealyungkari your fps can be higher than your monitors refresh rate
@@shork. it can but it won’t be any difference
@@Sufiley a bit less input lag
@@shork. only one cap higher than your monitors refresh rate tho anymore will cause screen tearing so yea you’re right
0:01 30 Hz
0:56 60 Hz
2:03 120 Hz
3:09 144 Hz
4:48 165 Hz
5:13 240 Hz
6:24 360 Hz
Meanwhile im watching with 60hz phone
Me on my 420hz monitor watching this shit
@@RealYunoCS since when there is a 420 Hz monitor?
@@RealYunoCS a 420hz monitor doesnt exist
@@RealYunoCS Caught in 4k
@@yeahwhatever1521 there r special builds, you obviously can't buy them from any ordinary shop
Watching him building...
Me who can’t even build 360s:
Be like:😐😐😐😐
Is a 60hz isus gaming monitor any good ?
Since UA-cam uploads videos on 60fps, it's hard to tell the difference unless you.have played on different fps. I have never tried 360 hz before, but I have tried up to 240 fps and there is a massive difference between 240 and 30
Hey man I'm trying to upgrade from 60fps to 120fps but my parents say there's no difference is that true?
@@ExeLBozo
Oh
there’s a huge difference. Day and night but if your getting 120hz might aswell get the 144hz for a few more bucks, its worth it trust me.
@@angadchattha3730 oh ty but ps5 max is 120fps
@@ExeLBozo ah I see I thought u we’re on pc
wtf, The video is in 60 but I realize that it looks even more fluid, is it my thing?
If you record in 120fps plus, it looks smoother because your eyes are tricking you into seeing more frames when you actually aren't because UA-cam FPS limit.
@@kxiju8531 lmao that’s completely incorrect, if you record at a framerate higher than 60 fps you can render it in a software like vegas pro and it creates blur frames which are multiple frames blended into one, i dont know exactly how it works but recording at 120fps will give you 2 blur frames and 240 will give you 4. It doesnt have anything to do with placebo
Thing is with this video is i don’t think the guy rendered it so anything above 60 still was capped at 60
@@rapgamefg yeah I didn't know exaclty but yeah I was just trying to help.
@@rapgamefg yeah
My problem is I’m on a budget with an older system so getting high fps at 1440p is gonna be hard for my pc which is why I’ve been using a 1080p 75hz monitor
Don't watch this video if you're getting a new monitor. UA-cam videos are capped to 60 fps...
my monitor is 60hz, so i think i cant differentiate after 60hz
Is not the fault of your monitor, UA-cam is capped at 60hz
This guy can't show us the 360hz because he doesn't have a 360hz monitor so that one was kind of pointless
UA-cam has a 60fps limit dumbass
@@Gwalchgwyn Lmfoa when did i say that i couldn't see a difference tf?
@@Gwalchgwyn past 60hz i couldnt tell a difference cause youtube is limited to 60 fps
UA-cam always makes it 60 hz
This is honestly helpful because I have been thinking about getting a monitor but, it only had 180Hz and I did not know if that would provide gaming experiences I wanted. After watching his I feel like for the price of it I will be satisfied buying it!
When your doing a 1v1 edit map but you don't have any friends😭😭
minecraft but in no blocks,tpp and 8096x
As someone who owns a 165hz monitor, i can say that you don't need anything above that, it's truly a game changer.
If you’ve never had above that how would you know? lol
@@zacharycaruso3892 because i think 165hz is enough man, you dont have to have something to know that its too much, you can assume that you dont need a 240hz monitor if you have a 165hz monitor, do you understand now??
@@toastychan0001no actually, most people think their current refresh rate is enough
@@makerjulian that is what i thought when i had a 60 hertz monitor
@@toastychan0001 so you agree with me?
My friends at school are so dum they say they have $1000 fps on Fortnite yes there pc can probably run that but they don’t make monitors good enough yet
2:23 why do i hear a beat
as soon as you go onto a higher hz than what you used to use, its literally painful
from 120Hz above is hard to tell the differ , except if you play some game with slowmotion
ehh i wouldnt say so, i can definitely feel a difference from 120-165 on a lot of games, might just be me
Got a ps5, gonna upgrade to 4K 120hz monitor here soon just wish they weren’t so expensive lol
This was executed well I must say, see you build with a lot of commotion was interesting alone.. well done
Came for the benchmark.
Left a professional carpenter.
Ahh man and me playing on 30fps with tons of latency spikes...
Ig I'll need to save up for a pc ._.
RIP30FPS
You will also need a monitor with a high refresh rate, if you buy a 60hz monitor u will only be able to run 60fps with your pc. A good monitor is a 140hz to 240hz monitor to run high fps with your pc
@@a7phy219 yup, ik all of this, but thanks.
I am just lokking for a pc that can run 1080p@60 for now... possibly build of intel i7 10700 or i5 11600/11400 + (integrated graphics) 8GB 3200mhz Ram + H410M (for intel i7 10700) or Asrock b560 Pro4 (for i5 11th gen) etc... I am not gonna get a GPU yet ... too pricey
as a 240hz player i can say that that looks way better than 30fps and way better than 60fps
Fun Fact: UA-cam supports a maximum of 60 FPS.
I hope 144 FPS is supported one day.
This mans can build better than I can speak like bruh
360hz super smooth ❤️
you cant tell the difference in real life. between 240hz and 360hz, but it dose feel like your dpi is lower and your click is loading in faster
If you're watching this on your phone, I WISH YOU THE BEST LUCK TO SURVIVE IN THIS WORLD.
I'm about to switch from 60Hz to 144Hz and from what I've heard, 144Hz is great.
How is it? Should I make the switch?
@@stellerate It's pretty great. You get smooth gameplay and it's really enjoyable and it only costs about 150€
im gonna buy my brand new pc with a 165 hz monitor from asus after 2years with my 60 hz tv and xbox one s wish me luck guys ❤
Me to bro 8 years with 60 hz with playstation 4 now i have playstation 5 and 165 hz monitor from acer❤❤ and I’m happy for u bro🤍🤍🤍
Personally I’m a 144 hz person I recommend no higher
no higher hz will always be better just more expensive.
@MohammedJl14_fn Btw ye same
240 is good
144. Enough
if you just play games like csgo like me for some reason i recommend 240hz cuz i get 300 fps personally
2k 165 hz or 1080p 240 hz monitor pls answer which should ı buy ı dont like 1080 p
Me Playing Fartnayt on 60hz: Literally Lags every time i move ;-;
Bro you need Some better wifi
ah yes, fartnayt
Same bro but I got 360 hz with a 3090 😎
@@Ilovevenom575 it’s so hard for me to play fortnite, because I have a 6700xt and for some reason the fps are just absolutely horrible on 1080p and 1440p even tho they aren’t at max
@@haydentrenson942 do you use Max setting on fortnite????
UA-cams 60hz compression:
i didnt know 60hz from 144 was so much of a diffrence it feels smoth less delay and looks like butter, but since yt makes videos 60fps its harder to see so we would have to feel it for our selfs.
I've been playing on 60hz for 8 years, I just got a pc that can easily handle my new 540hz monitor on fortnite, and I am never going back to 60hz for a second.
Me with 30 hz didnt noticng the diference xd
🤦
Feels bad man
You can’t see the difference on yt lmao
how do u hav 30hz??? what are u playing on a potato
Is a 75hz monitor calm for Xbox series s or ps5 digital?
@Splxshy I think your game will run a 144 FPS or 120 FPS
I think 144hz monitor is just enough, you can play anything smoothly with just 60hz or even 144hz. my monitor is Asus VG27aq and it was pretty nice monitor.
was?
"you can play anything smoothly with just 60hz OR EVEN 144hz" smh..
@@IamTheGreatCornholioo My mans speeling be hit mostly miss
Correct. But 120hz feels smoother than 60hz (i say this as an iPad Pro user, things like scrolling just feels way smoother).
60 fps is so bad. There are a lot of frame drops and if u are playing comp, in end-games ur fps will fall to 30-40 so its not so good
I have a question, I have a gaming laptop acer aspire 7 rtx 3050 144hz when i play fortnite im supposed to get 144 fps and above right? but i get 70 80 and 90 fps maximum on stretch screen and low settings is that like normal or not if not how do i fix it what do i do
When comparising the video needs to be slow down to 1000 Frames to see a difference.
360hz can be easily seen that it is very smooth in motion.
Every 1 - 2 ms will be a new picture.
at 240 it will be arround 4-5 ms
60 frames per second is 60 Hz in a second.
1 second equals 1000 milliseconds.
1000/60=(50/3=16(2/3)=16.6 ms
144Hz would be
1000/144=(125/18=6(17/18)=6.94 ms
so 360hz would be 2.77 ms AND NOT your "every 1-2ms new picture". stop throwing around lies thx
You use macro to reset build?
30hz do be lookin kinda smooth
does having a high refresh rate make you better at editing as in they are more consitent?
So I just bought a 165hz monitor. Im pleased with it but higher hz monitors are very overrated. Definitely a noticeable difference but it's not all that great. I wouldn't go for 165hz or 240 or anything like that maybe stick to 120hz or 144hz even 75 is fine
having a higher refresh rate helps in most games
thats because your monitor is dog shit or you didn’t set up the 165hz on Nvidia panel
@@marioduvi8643 its an asus monitor.. its not dogshit and yes i set up 165hz, im simply saying save a few bucks and go for 144hz, also the comment is 7 months old dude..
@@Spencii1 sup dude
Me: watching this video on a 60hz screen pretending like I see a difference
Just remember if you play 60fps just play smooth you’ll be fine faster response on the monitor quicker you can go, it’s all about timing fam
U can be good even great at games on 60 but u want that next gen or that pc trust
Me watching this on a 390hz screen
Me: wow this is smooth
Jus sayin that i play on 165hz and thats just right for mee...
Me watching this video in 240hz-Ok
The 30hz does look pretty good idk why
im getting a laptop with about 165HZ or 240. Thanks for this video!
30hz do be lokin kinda smooth
30 Hz are shoot at better PC then yours
@UCwgO9oT-sT5PenJR41sdCow before you go at someone learn grammar
@@Faisal_hashmi go to a grammar school you bum
I can get 240fps but only got a 60hz monitor, if I get 240hz will I just get faster edits or a better shot or something or does it just look better
It will just look better
When u were on 144hz u we’re getting around 300fps
Lol Fr
Yeah, but if you're at 144hz you can only see 144 fps. The rest passed that just decreases input lag and provides more up to date frames.
is it your hands that are 360hz or the monitor
I've got a 144hz and I must say it was a huge upgrade from my 60hz
how to do that
@@rasy_1094 Buy a 144 hz monitor
60fps is fine .
I don’t feel too much different with 60 and 120fps
The main difference between 30hz to 240 will show in gta v not in fortnite
I think I barfed 3x when seeing 30hz
Well you're watching a 60fps video on what is likely a 60hz screen and this guy is just capping frame rate not changing monitor so that's questionable
is the difference between 120hz and 144hz big or basically the same with a little bit better on the 144hz?
120 and 144 have basically no difference
@Gogi Poggers 144hz to 240hz is just like 60 to 140hz
The hz of your monitor won’t matter if your not going past 140 FPS
For anything above 140 hz maybe. It's still better to get 140 FPS on 60 hz than 60 fps at 60 hz.
everyone complaining about watching it on a 60Hz monitor when the video quality literally only goes up to 60 anyway
I'm on my 165Hz monitor and you can't see the difference other than 30 because of the quality.. so you're really not missing out guys
360 hz to see that wind move in 520 fps
bro your edits is nice
thanks
its the same clip
No it not wtf😂
@@dna7897 basicallly it is tho. we cant see a difference. its impossible
@@Aqua2D ok but its not the same clip UA-cam locks videos in 60hz
@@dna7897 ik it was joke
I’m getting 165hz monitor for my birthday do you think it’s going to be a big difference compared to 75hz
This is a fps test not a hz test bro etf
No it's not, If you want to see more details what are the different, go see the videos at -0,25 speed. Thats the different
the video is very good, but the 300hz does not make much sense because human eyes see at most 250hz but it is still a good choice, very good video!
???
I actually play on 30 FPS no cap bro
Bought a 240hz ima try it out soon, been playing on 60hz for a long time pretty excited
Dude you say 360hz and it’s not even higher than 200fps
Hz is not fps yk
It's not about FPS. BUT, it's about respond times. Set your video to 0,25 you will see the different
Anything higher than 240hz is honestly unnecessary imo 🤷🏾♂️
I like it
I'm 30 hz bro
We are the same
144
What the hell
Tough
It's it like how fast it is or like just the grafics
Someone tell him we can’t see anything above 60 FPS
We can't see anything above 60 FPS (lol)
We can’t see anything above 60fps because UA-cam only allows up to 60fps 😂
@@gboys4718 umm that’s what I said 🤷♂️
@@nsdfancy nope you never gave a reason 😂
@@gboys4718 because the reason is very obvious unless ur 10 yrs old 😂
It’s mad to think I’ve never been able to truly experience 240hz or 360hz
imagine playin on 30 hz oh wait thats me lol
Well you could always get a better monitor
@@muffinsandbeans714 no shit sherlock
@@muffinsandbeans714 money?
@@Lambakaf123-DarknessNodes he never specified if he had money or not also idk work if you’re old enough and if not save up money
Never seen 60fps look this nice😂
That’s a lot of hrz
he was on 144hz the whole time look at latency markers m:144hz
Me watching this on a 60hz display: very useful information.
360 hz with those setting? Wow...
Prolly running 3 3090’s SLI. XD
@@ArmanBaig sure, everybody has that
@@RobPatatas. Doesn’t matter
@@ArmanBaig you can’t run 3 3090s in SLI let alone fitting them in your case
@@gypsyslayer4224 it was a joke bud 👍
when I get the enough money to buy a pc, Ill have a 144 - 240 monitor