Russian Air Force - The Arsenal part 2/4 |HD|

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 126

  • @specnaz91
    @specnaz91 13 років тому

    So far the best video on the Air Force on UA-cam!!!

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Oh and you wanted sources of my info on range of both planes. Range of ~3000km for F-22 is info from official USAF website, and range of 5500km for PAK-FA is info published by Sukhoi officials.

  • @rioter2188
    @rioter2188 4 роки тому

    Спасибо вам за безопасное наше небо.Пилоты,конструкторы всем от кого это зависит СПАСИБО Мужики.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    PAK-FA`s RCS is undetectable by radar as much as F-22`s. PAK-FA has 2 times bigger range of radar and its also AESA radar like on F-22. It has 2 times bigger range and can carry long range missiles like R-37 (250-400km anti awacs missiles) that F-22 cant. PAK-FA also has 2 more smaller radars on wings, 3D thrust vectoring, unlike F-22`s 2D. There are already 10 new engines built for new airframes of PAK-FA and one squadron should start exercies with weapons in Lipetsk flight center next year

  • @hillboy565
    @hillboy565 13 років тому

    Amazing...
    thnx sukhoi235

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @MrMicoSrb
    I have PAK-FA video, and i didnt put it because its still not in operational service, here are only planes and helicopters in service within Russian AF.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Now yes but French offered them development of engine for both Tejas and Rafales that are going to be delivered to them based on original version of Tejas engine, GTX-35VS Kaveri

  • @Skarmaks
    @Skarmaks 13 років тому

    Great job! I really love Sukhoi fighters...greetings from Bulgaria!

  • @guitarmaster127
    @guitarmaster127 13 років тому

    One word... Amazing...

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    @Humberto4790
    He is former KGB agent, im not sure if he has black belt in karate but for sure knows it well and few other fighting techniques and he is not jet pilot, he just flew in Tu-160 as co-pilot.

  • @DJMikaelito
    @DJMikaelito 13 років тому

    Angels in the Sky ! ! !
    IC XC NIKA

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    French offered full deal with Rafale too. Full technology transfer along with new AESA radar when its completed. They also offered new engine for HAL Tejas. India has previous experience with Dassault planes, Mirage 2000. It was pretty logical choice. I was best offer and best plane out there. And they could make balance between Russian and NATO weaponry, keeping kind of neutrality in their foreign relations.

  • @HvPman
    @HvPman 13 років тому

    Special thanks for the part with helicopters!

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Yes, its used for big targets like Awacs or Bombers. F-22 does not have something like that in arsenal. Counterpart to AIM-120D is R-77, which has similar range, 160km.

  • @GoldEagleSRB
    @GoldEagleSRB 13 років тому

    Odlican video, svaka cast .

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @arclight777
    adobe after effects, windows movie maker and adobe premiere pro

  • @vladvasiltove3656
    @vladvasiltove3656 11 років тому

    amazing

  • @chimai001
    @chimai001 13 років тому

    amazing video!

  • @victormejias15
    @victormejias15 12 років тому

    Men I LOVE YOUR VIDS, i am from Venezuela and your Sukhois are very awesome, i love the machines from Rusia!!!

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @TheMickyGMan1
    DJ Tiesto-Destination sunshine, some remix i dont remember which one

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    AN/ALR 94 i used so main radar APG-77 has lower emission and ALR94 has bigger range than radar itself to locate targets. PAK-FA doesnt even need that wth its radar`s range of 400km which is its effective range since it can carry missiles that can be fired at that distance unlike F-22 which longest range missile is AIM-120. As i mentioned there are 10 completely new engines for 5 new airframes ready for testing. AL-41F1. And that engine completely meets requirements.

  • @1nEGOR
    @1nEGOR 12 років тому

    song is called Balearic Bill - Destination Sunshine (Tiësto Remix) (Y)

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @zoomenager
    thanks, i am glad you like them

  • @Atrus3g
    @Atrus3g 11 років тому

    Well done!

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    F-22 has many flaws and almost whole 2011, entire fleet was grounded due to technical problems with oxygen and ejection seats. On the other hand, maintenance of 1 F-22 costs like 5 or more other planes and thats why production was stopped.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    And your point is? Btw Su-30 can be fitted with AESA radar. And SM version has thrust vectoring and carries IRBIS-E, the best PESA radar in teh world. On the other hand, winner of MRCA, Rafale, still has PESA radar and French are currently developing AESA radar for it. Even though it had PESA radar it still won the tender.

  • @XMmiya
    @XMmiya 13 років тому

    動画の編集が上手いですね!
    選曲も良い感じ♪
    何よりロシア軍がカッコイイ^^
    Это хорошо редактирования видео.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @reistje
    Movies, Documentaries and stuff like that :)

  • @Thashiznitov1
    @Thashiznitov1 13 років тому

    Good video

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    T-50 RCS is 0.01m2 from all aspects, F-22 RCS is 0.0001m2 from front and 0.01m2 from side or rear. Info is from ausairpower(dot)net. As i mentioned, T-50 uses completely new systems, nothing "soviet made" and it will be state of art fighter.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @AugmentedB737
    DJ Tiesto-Destination Sunshine

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @SCGSaz
    DJ Tiesto-Destination sunshine

  • @TheKifinas
    @TheKifinas 13 років тому

    men you have to go to work at a chanell your editing and please make more videos you are the best !! thanks !!

  • @CharlesSalvato
    @CharlesSalvato 13 років тому

    Great job on the mix! Which movie maker did you use?

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    No, Russian air force bought Su-30SM instead, agreement was signed few weeks ago. Did F-22 change its radar during years?

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @GEOARMYGE
    DJ Tiesto-Destination sunshine

  • @cyber8000
    @cyber8000 13 років тому

    @sukhoi235 1:36 what jet is that?

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    No, F-16 fell out of tender first, not MiG-35. And there isnt an official list of "places" on that tender, that wasnt a child competition, it was 11 bilion dolars worth contract. Algeria returned MiG-29s because they decided to buy Su-30s, i dont really see how is this loss for Russia?

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @bilishebat
    Its uploaded, check it on my channel or just type in search The arsenal part 3/4

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    You havent shown any proof for that either? Mig started development of light fighter, also with stealth characteristics, MiG LMFS. MiG-29 is aging aircraft and will be replaced by new fighter in the future. Just like USAF plans to change all F-16s with F-35 when/if it enters serial production

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    2 years. Much less than F-35. It does have weapons bay developed (it was developed back in 1997 on Su-47) and its known that it will use Gsh-301. F-22 crashed during testing so? Its quite normal that there are couple of problems here and there on testing, its not normal that 9 years with all the money and might you cant develop fighter.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    AL-41F1 is not based on Saturn 117S. Its is in 117 family but its not based on 117S. Su-35 and PAK-FA dont have same engines. As i mentioned before PAK-FA has RCS low enough to be undetectable by any US radar. On the other hand F-22s stealth can be detected by Russian radars (AA systems). F-22 has range 2 times smaller than PAK-FA and with external fuel tanks, F-22s RCS is much greater and its main advantage-stealth is questionable.

  • @zaho87
    @zaho87 13 років тому

    I can simply say two things:
    1st Russian aircraft are the best!
    2nd This video is awesome!

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @40UmdrehungenMinimum
    Yes it is. I think you have to become Russian citizen though and do some exams and after that you can go to military school. Its even easier if you have a realtive who is Russian.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @cyber8000
    Tu-22M3

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  13 років тому

    @sh4dy49
    yes :)

  • @user-gp6wi8mr4y
    @user-gp6wi8mr4y 11 місяців тому

    Neam music???

  • @1nEGOR
    @1nEGOR 12 років тому

    omg migs are beautyfull

  • @MikeGTraining
    @MikeGTraining 13 років тому

    song ??

  • @smallwoundchannel
    @smallwoundchannel 12 років тому +1

    NEEDS MOAR BOMBERS!!! ;-)

  • @epmuoibon
    @epmuoibon 12 років тому

    2:04 woow!

  • @bilishebat
    @bilishebat 13 років тому

    where is the part 3?

  • @hellcat9241
    @hellcat9241 4 роки тому

    Мы на земле, вы в воздухе огромный привет от ПВ

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    DJ Tiesto-Destination sunshine remix

  • @cyber8000
    @cyber8000 13 років тому

    Перспективный=future?

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Who is buying old F-16s? No one. Belgium is making and selling licencly F-16MLU and Turkey is building them also on licence i think. Other than that only versions sold are Block 52, 52+ and new 60. They were not impressed. So? They werent impressed with F-16 or F-18 either since they havent bought any of them. And yes, MiG-29 isnt really plane that is sold nowadays a lot but Su-27/30 on the other hand are being sold all over the world. In the end, it really doesnt matter if its MiG or Su.

  • @realIBeliX
    @realIBeliX 12 років тому

    You had export modified export versions back in 90's, made in Hungary and Poland. And there were no many dogfights. Well, obviously 21 and 29 arent good as 35 ))
    Look at F-117 what happened. So called "Stealth plane".
    Greetings from Russia brother )

  • @strizhi
    @strizhi 13 років тому

    WOW seeing Soviet aircraft in action at the end made the video complete as if to remind viewers of history. Also fun fact, Russians were the ones to come up with the fly by wire system using T-4 as a testbed. Yet one of the last Soviet fighter designs - MiG-29 did not incorporate this like Su-27 did :)

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Moscow times is Finnish owned newspaper well known for critisizing Russian goverment. Its like reading about PAK-FA on Venezuelan owned newspaper known for critisizing US goverment.
    Theese are facts for PAK-FA over F-22
    PAK-FA has
    -Stronger AESA radar
    -2 times bigger range
    -Capability of carrying long range missiles
    -3D thrust vectoring
    You can check that anywhere you want to

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Aim-120D has range nowhere near R-37 which range is 400km.

  • @x3zell
    @x3zell 13 років тому

    song song

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Some Russian military analyser`s statement. You see how funny biased informations are? You stated Moscow times which i told that is anti Russian goverment Finnish owned newspaper. You have also Kommrsant and Nezavisimaya gazeta, anti Russian goverment newspapers, so you might want to get more biased info from there.

  • @hassoonee
    @hassoonee 12 років тому

    @sukhoi235 Tiesto Power Mix

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    As you mentioned, they have completely different doctrines. USAF along with rest of US army and USN has attacking doctrine. They are build to attack over over the world and VVS has doctrine of defending Russian soil and their interests in the region. Because of that and many other reasons we cant really even compare USAF and VVS except on paper, and on paper USAF is stronger. USN is also stronger than VMF but Russian ground forces and ICBMs are way superior to US.

  • @realIBeliX
    @realIBeliX 12 років тому

    Hey bro.
    MiG-29 isnt bad airplane, it also depends on what model, the new model is good as real modern jets, and still, older MiG, even MiG-21 has some advantages, like missles, radar, that are still better than NATO modern jets.

  • @DeathFolk
    @DeathFolk 13 років тому

    Great Russia gotta respect and love Suhoki! As a american with love for the USAF and its F-22 F-15 my other love is for sure RAF Su-35, Su-30MKI can't wait til see PAK-FA T-50 when its complete just a MARVEL to another great nation!

  • @realIBeliX
    @realIBeliX 13 років тому

    TU160

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    militaryparitet(dot)com/ttp/data/ic_ttp/387/ its in russian, so use google translate to translate to english....anyway it says that Russian air force colonel said how Russia is going to participate in Red flag in 2012

  • @invader-ez4ll
    @invader-ez4ll 9 років тому

    когда мы говорим про истребители,не забывайте про то сколько стоит каждый из них,их цена и рентабельность производства...на каждый самолет нато можно натравить десяток наших..

  • @DRPadmologist
    @DRPadmologist 12 років тому

    no steam cats here my freinds, pure russian POWER

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    T-50 has better radar because F-22 radar is 10 years old technology and Russians are well known for making good radars and AA systems. Whole T-50 project is currently main project in whole Russian military and dozens of bueraus and corporations are working on it. Whole project is being overwatched by Putin himself, under all of those circumstances that will be the best fighter plane in the world when it enters serial production.

  • @Zukhov1945
    @Zukhov1945 12 років тому

    Meanwhile MiG21 can't be compared to modern fighters, MiG29 can but this is a light fighter, not meant to fight against Eurofighter or F-14/15/18/22/35. Su-35 is meant to fight F-22/35, Su-27 may be on the same level, if the russians continue keeping up with the americans the Su-27 family. However, i'd say latest sukhoi stuff is for sure not inferior to the latets american stuff.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    AESA radar for PAK-FA is completed and T-50-3 already flown with it along with all the other electronics systems. T-50 (just shorter name for PAK-FA) has range of 5500km and F-22 has around 3000 with external tanks which make its RCS bigger. MiG-35 was just export plane, made for evaluation, it never entered serial production. MiG-29K/KUB is developed from it and it entered serial production and was bought by India in the end anyway.

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Maybe because of the common sense and not just personal preference. F-35 is hole that drains money for 9 years, and not only US money, but money of like 10 more countries that believed in that project. Yeah, i would be mad too. Find me other Russian sources.

  • @1nEGOR
    @1nEGOR 12 років тому

    @sukhoi235 lol but he must learn russian perfectly or otherwise...

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    From serial production planes, yes. But PAK-FA is a lot superior to F-22. F-16 was first to fall off from MRCA tender. I read that Su-30 was unmatchable against F-16 or F-15 on Red flag? There was also comparison made by Australians between Su-30, F-35 and F-18E/F which has proven that Su-30 is superior to both of them and that F-35 is total shit and waste of money, there is even video on UA-cam about that.

  • @Ice.muffin
    @Ice.muffin 11 років тому

    Groaznic :( ...

  • @4152428010
    @4152428010 12 років тому

    Слава России! Храни ГОСПОДИ Россию-матушку!!!

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    And yes, maybe Russians have problem with developing some stuff but at least their fleet of planes isnt grounded for a year because of rusting ejection seats and metals in oxygen poisoning pilots?

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Experts? Maybe guys from Pentagon that are angry because they cant develop F-35 for 9 years now with budget gone 2-3 times over original one. F-22s production is stopped, it has many flaws and it has never been used in combat. Great way to spend few bilion dollars with national debt of 14 thousand bilion dollars isnt it?

  • @sh4dy49
    @sh4dy49 13 років тому

    1:41 - is he Wladimir Putin?

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    I googled it and that statement was said by Ashley Tellis. Guy that worked for State department and in US embassy in New delhi. You are kidding me right? Its like quoting guy that works for FSB saying Western jets are shit. Try to be a bit objective, read both Russian and US sources. There are Russian sources sayin that RCS of F-22 is actually 0.3m2 but i know that both sides are biased as fuck and for real informations you need find something in middle.

  • @realIBeliX
    @realIBeliX 13 років тому

    @aznpride0 That is BS dude. I dont understand how so many people think that US aircraft is better, seriously. Those never seen MiG and Drys' pilot manuevrs and stuff that RUS planes cna do.

  • @sokolovss
    @sokolovss 12 років тому

    Great Planes SU-35 is the Best !!!

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Type Su-30 beats F-15 and you will get completely oposite information to that video. On the other hand, Russia is going to participate in Red flag this year probably so...

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Lies?
    -I said PAKFA has superior avionics and thats true,check that out
    -I said PAKFA has RCS low enough to be undetectable by US radars which is also true
    -PAK-FA`s engines ARE meeting requirements,Sukhoi CEO statement is that.
    There are tons of "anti F-22" sources over the internet i can quote anytime,try to be realistic,US is in debt thats bigger than rest of the world together, there are big cuts of funding to army now and situation with F-22 is not good since whole fleet was down for year

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    PAK-FA has better radar, better weaponry, more capability, better manouverability, bigger range. India is buying PAK-FA, not F-35.....India is buying Su-30, not F-15, India is buying MiG-29K/KUB not F-18E/F, India is buying Rafale, not US plane, so your point is?

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    Its true that most of Russian planes are superior to US counterparts, but numbers do mean a lot. For example, latest MiG-29 is better than latest F-16, but Russia has less than 400 of them and US has 1200 F-16s. Thats a huge difference. US couldnt destroy VVS because of simple reason that there are more than 4000 planes in service + Russian AA systems that are best in the world, but if you compare them US air force is stronger.

  • @superDule123
    @superDule123 12 років тому

    I am Serbian,and our Air Force sucks..We have some planes home made and some russian planes like Mig 29,but if we could have MiG 35,Suhoi su 37,things would be much better for us...

  • @ZmajOgnjeni88
    @ZmajOgnjeni88 13 років тому

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Mi-35, Mi-28 i Ka-50 objasnili neke stvari! Perverzija!

  • @DRPadmologist
    @DRPadmologist 12 років тому

    @40UmdrehungenMinimum
    sign me up now

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    All of theese countries are buying new Block 52 versions. Flankers are being bought recently by Indonesia, Vietnam,China,India, Angola, Algeria, Venezuela, Belarus, Uganda,Malaysia. I dont blame you for being subborn and ignorant, if every day you hear same shit on media you will trust in it.Also have in mind that 14 thousand billion dollars debt, its your debt, not mine.Russia along with China has no international debts, its matter of time when US economy will break.Funding wars cant even help

  • @24panchon
    @24panchon 12 років тому

    Russia I love you

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    They have invested bilions into that and not F-35 like some European countries and Israel which are not getting now thing they invested into. Again, they both it for Su-30, not F-15. Bilions to gain for Russia, bilions to lose fo US. India is using RUSSIAN built carrier :) You see, Russian won billions and billion of dollars over US in India.

  • @FreddoX1
    @FreddoX1 13 років тому

    Russia, Master race!!

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    For god sake, you actually believe how guy who is american or works for them would give objective opinion on Russia? FFS even US high officials consider Russia as enemy and always talk shit about Russia. I cant simply believe how propaganda destroys your brain. At least im getting my info from different sources and trying to see what right and not whats nice.

  • @balija346
    @balija346 7 місяців тому

    Russia top 3 power

  • @sukhoi235
    @sukhoi235  12 років тому

    And your argument makes sense? I give you facts on PAK-FA avionics and weaponry and all you have to say is F-22 is better, it has lower RCS....Typical American

  • @realIBeliX
    @realIBeliX 12 років тому

    Matter what? Are you debil?
    Tell me US/NATO and Russian AF doctrine please.? ))
    As I already said, our air force would definetly would use SAM (Tor, Pantsirs, 'Ushkas)

  • @superDule123
    @superDule123 12 років тому

    tell that to our pilots who were killed in fight against NATO planes during the war in 1999,and they had big problems with radar... sorry,but I think that MiG-21 and 29 aren't as good as MiG-35 and Suhoi 37..and we have some home made planes like "Galeb" or "Orao" and I think they are the worst... greetings from Republika Srpska my Orthodox brother!!!!