The comparison would have been fairer by comparing two models equipped with woofers of the same dimensions and at the same bass/reflex load! We have a front bass reflex on the Harbeth, and a rear bass reflex for the Quadral, with a rear wall far away and bass trap at the corners of the walls! So it's not surprising that the Quadral have much less sub bass and a tighter bass, which tends to have a slightly more forward mid-treble! The Harbeth are more carnal, more enveloping, warmer timbres and thus a listening that will seem much more comfortable and pleasant on long listening sessions, the Quadral would deserve a better implementation to offer the best of themselves, in any case, they are not ridiculous, especially since the price is not comparable to the Harbeth which is 75% more expensive!
Harbeth speaker natural, detailing,music depth and analogue feel is awesome.
Harbeth sounds natural & delicious. Wins in vocal. Good work
Quadral gives nice presentation of the performance, Harbet gives nice presentation of the instruments
What a great test. Can’t believe how big galan 9 actually sound. And they sound natural with more clarity.
Forget about which had more bass, mid-range or treble, the Harbeths are more 'articulate' because the music made more sense when they were playing.
Humm...great test! To my ears the Garlan’s sound more natural and less like a speaker!
Definitely NOT! ..Quadral sound thin and plastic ..like cheap supermarkt system. Far away from natural.
No both good...different ear...different sound..ha ha..
這兩個喇叭就像他們的民族性一樣.德國的剛硬清楚.英國的柔和紳士...
It was hard sometimes to tell the difference! But both speakers sound phenomenal!!! ☮️🖖🏽
WoW Quadral play so Amazing 🎼🎼🎼🎼🎼
I'll pick quadral,
Thanks for posting.
M30.1 spreads more thru space and separates more the details.
I like a warmer and little colour
sound so go with the 30.1
Quadral's got my ears! more open midrange sound on the first recording not so much on the second.
Harbeth sounds more organic the other leaner
The comparison would have been fairer by comparing two models equipped with woofers of the same dimensions and at the same bass/reflex load!
We have a front bass reflex on the Harbeth, and a rear bass reflex for the Quadral, with a rear wall far away and bass trap at the corners of the walls!
So it's not surprising that the Quadral have much less sub bass and a tighter bass, which tends to have a slightly more forward mid-treble!
The Harbeth are more carnal, more enveloping, warmer timbres and thus a listening that will seem much more comfortable and pleasant on long listening sessions, the Quadral would deserve a better implementation to offer the best of themselves, in any case, they are not ridiculous, especially since the price is not comparable to the Harbeth which is 75% more expensive!
Altough the ribbon tweeter sounds amazing. The Quadral sounds too clean. Too bright without concrete mids. I prefer the Harbeth.
Agree
i can listen to harbeth for days...
Guitar goes to Harbeth for sure. Voices on the Garlan, ironically.
I like Harbeth, very warm!
聲箱體積相差很遠 這種比較公平嗎
Add English subtitles. Great work 👍🏼
Aurum Galan 9 has a wider soundstage and plays more open
Wonderful thanks Harbeth forever...
galan 9 is winner on vocals
Very sweet, musical vocals on harbeth, but they sound boxy
Great work !!! Keep posting this kind of comparison. It is very helpful.
The Aurum Galans sound scratchy, tinny by comparison with the Harbeth M30.1.
Great system, great video! Thank you for sharing.
I hope you continue making these kind of videos to help your audience. Thanks
用心經營的店家!
Hello, Please advise if Harbeth's M40.2 speakers sound better than these M30.1 speakers? Are these M40.2 value for money?
2:05 Notice the loss of tonal accuracy of the guitar moving from one speaker to the other.
Quadral 🙏🙏🙏
great room, thank you for posting
夏巴夫好声D,音乐味濃D
Muhteşem b.ir yorum: Herbeth hoparlörlerin de sahnesi mujhteşem
thanks for sharing the video, and appreciate the effort.
Harbeth M30.1 live sound
Thinner sound on Gulan and rich sound with Harbeth
i prefer quadral,,more opened stage,harbeth little boxy sound
The harbeth add more weight to the sound but the aurum have a slight more resolution ....
没对harbeth喇叭搞鬼?为何声音那么暗沉?
感谢呈现。真的很棒的呈现和切换。两组音箱,HARBETH M30.1木质味道多了一点;德国的那个,木质味道少了一点。总之,两组的味道都不是正正好好。正正好好的是 HARBETH M40.1,呵呵。
First recording Harbeth second Quadral but both very good.
I will pick Harbeth M30.1
Those Harbeths are sooo seductive.
Amazing test
You know it bro!!!
M30.1👍
The Quadral is half as big and 60% less expensive.
Well well well I own a pair of Galan 9 and I must say they ain't bad of course but you can hear the difference even through the video
Question, can they be used for any music, what about fronts for movies and lastly using Arcam receiver. Avr850. Tks
M30.1 is much awsome er.
Great test. Thx
标示牌颜色淡了,希望换个深色的醒目点。
Harbeth M30.1在大房間裡的一角唱,quadral AURUM GALAN 9在我的面前唱。
so good!
想問是用何種設備錄音的呢?
The is literally more body present with the. Bigger Harbeth.
Aurum Galan sounds good but I feel Harbeth M30.1 got a fuller Sound.
好明显,雨后初睛胜出
Harbeth sound better I here more through them.
求CD專輯名!正
Harbeth +1
Sedan 9 vs Harbeth Wäre fairer als Galan .
I you want to watch how the Pass Int 25 excited this beauties, maybe you would like this video: ua-cam.com/video/Sh4_hB6zMgw/v-deo.html
根本不是一个等级,雨后好听的太多。
M30.1 лучше на мой вкус.
habeth better