The Nazi super plane that nearly won the war

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 968

  • @BHuang92
    @BHuang92 Рік тому +1651

    Interesting Fact:
    The British assumed that the Germans stole their idea of the turbojet engine. After the war, the designer of the Me 262 and his British counterpart met each other to compare notes and concluded that the designs of the jet engines were very different from each other.

    • @DefinitelyNotEmma
      @DefinitelyNotEmma Рік тому +236

      Similar to how Northrop and Horten worked simultaneously on flying wing concepts. War really creates genius ideas.

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому +97

      The German engines suffered from poor quality metallurgy. Whittle realised early on that for the jet to be reliable this was crucial. Me 262s etc needed complete engine changes after a few sorties.

    • @SomeOrdinaryJanitor
      @SomeOrdinaryJanitor Рік тому +58

      IIRC, the British developed the first Centrifugal Jet engine, while the Germans developed Axial-Flow, inline style Jet engines too.

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому

      @@SomeOrdinaryJanitor Yet were hopelessly unreliable. Your point is?
      FUN FACT - the Soviets realised the German jet engines they captured were useless. They tried espionage to discover UK metallurgical technology hoping to use the material with copying the German engine designs, that didn't work. They therefore bought Rolls Royce engines and a licence and copied them. The MiG 15 was powered by these. The US engines were the same.

    • @tywilliams4332
      @tywilliams4332 Рік тому +4

      wow

  • @stevenharsono9911
    @stevenharsono9911 Рік тому +1814

    Too little and too late , can you imagine if Me-262 is operational by 1941

    • @stefix5554
      @stefix5554 Рік тому +191

      while interesting concept i think allies would have been superior since the german luftwaffe didnt really have experience with the importance of energy and altitute since remember, they skipped the most important part the late pistons where altitute is needed

    • @dannyzero692
      @dannyzero692 Рік тому +66

      We also have to take into account of doctrine for this aircraft had it been operational in that year, which would be so complicated I don’t think most people can guess it, me included.

    • @DaiElsan
      @DaiElsan Рік тому +154

      War pushes development. If the Me262 appeared earlier then the British Jet would have rapidly been brought into service.

    • @Slay1337pl
      @Slay1337pl Рік тому +80

      They'd still be facing lack of materials to build them and the lack of production capacity.

    • @notaulgoodman9732
      @notaulgoodman9732 Рік тому +22

      @@dannyzero692 I think it would've been similar to the MiG-21s in Vietnam. Ambush and run if I remember it correctly.

  • @sabrinaleedance
    @sabrinaleedance Рік тому +556

    Imagine being one of the first ppl to pilot those jet fighters, honestly it mustve felt incredibly badass 😂

    • @uberbeeg
      @uberbeeg Рік тому +54

      They were prone to fires, so I think anxiety would have been high. New aircraft are usually treated with more distrust than joy.

    • @jacoblunn29
      @jacoblunn29 Рік тому +20

      @@uberbeeg must have been an intense mixture of excitement and fear. you have to believe they mustve been thrilled with how much faster it was when they opened the throttle

    • @dingse3_
      @dingse3_ Рік тому

      Badass? 🤦‍♂️

    • @BGI_guy
      @BGI_guy Рік тому +14

      ​@@dingse3_ what about it?

    • @patrickmiddleton1750
      @patrickmiddleton1750 Рік тому +6

      I’m about to unlock it in war thunder today and I’m gonna be going 3x faster than my friends 😆

  • @SuaveSpyMojo
    @SuaveSpyMojo Рік тому +124

    Nearly won the war? There was no way in hell the M.E 262 could have won the war in the small numbers it was produced. No chance in hell.

    • @barefootbreezy6983
      @barefootbreezy6983 9 місяців тому +12

      Me 262 lowkey trash

    • @Explosionsarecooler69
      @Explosionsarecooler69 8 місяців тому +1

      @@barefootbreezy6983it’s not that it was trash it’s just that it worked a lot more differently to a traditional fighter

    • @BobGeogeo
      @BobGeogeo 4 місяці тому +2

      Unreliable and not enough fuel for an inefficient jet, too.

    • @mika2swaggy
      @mika2swaggy 4 місяці тому +1

      Imagine they had an operation fleet of these by 1941 though

    • @csansolo
      @csansolo 3 місяці тому

      Bad gun platform. Too many issues.

  • @woltzwurld6760
    @woltzwurld6760 Рік тому +49

    Seeing one in the Smithsonian in 1992 was awesome. However, IMHO, “ Hitler ruined in” is a fable. This jet required tons of maintenance and rare materials, and premium fuel, which means it was unlikely to ever reach greater numbers than it did. But having said that, well done video.

    • @brettknoss486
      @brettknoss486 10 місяців тому +2

      It didn't require premium fuel, it did however have a lot of problems with rushed development, rushed engine design, and poor craftsmanship.

  • @generalsirc2615
    @generalsirc2615 Рік тому +206

    I was lucky to shake hands with a man named Huey lamp who shot down a ME 262 in P-47. He said he saw the me 262 below him and used his superior energy of high altitude and the sheer weight of his p-47 to catch up and shoot it down. Crazy what people went through.

    • @neoaxis3749
      @neoaxis3749 Рік тому +9

      Ok

    • @UndoEverything
      @UndoEverything Рік тому +29

      I had the honor of shaking hands with many dead pilots who were victims of ME-262. BTW, I am writing this comment from hell where those pilots are stacked for killing thousands of innocent Germans.

    • @neoaxis3749
      @neoaxis3749 Рік тому +11

      @@UndoEverything Ok

    • @KrGsMrNKusinagi0
      @KrGsMrNKusinagi0 Рік тому

      US pilots shot down migs with prop planes in vietnam

    • @jaykay7932
      @jaykay7932 Рік тому +1

      K

  • @DefinitelyNotEmma
    @DefinitelyNotEmma Рік тому +205

    The first 1st Gen fighter jet.
    To this day I just love how it looks like a flying shark. I imagine that later proposals like that Hohegeschwindigkeit models would have been able to compete with Korean War era MiG-15s and F-86s.
    The most important aspect however is that we should return to tradition and put 4 30mm gun in our fighter jets. FCAS with quad 30mm sounds like a very versatile platform xD

    • @thenathan4490
      @thenathan4490 Рік тому +8

      I think you forgot about British jets made during the Cold War that have 4 30mm ADEN cannons. There is a good reason why they didn't return to this idea ever again.
      As for the German MK108, sure, it is good if you can hit your enemy. You'd have a much higher change of hitting em with a Soviet 37mm cannon than what you can with these slow AF cannons.
      As for the Me-262 upgrade that can take out Sabres and MiGs, I don't know. If you are talking about the rocket engined 262, you'll still have more issues. The biggest problem is endurance. Till when can you keep firing your rockets ? By the time you ran out of rocket fuel, your enemy will have a massive advantage over you, making its endurance low. You also have to consider the Schwalbe's less than stellar maneuverability due to its heavier weight (2 engines underneath the wings won't help either).
      The only way to make the 262 capable of handling the MiGs or the Sabres in the Korean War is by finding a much better engine. You don't need any rocket engines or an extra engine, you just need to find a way to get an engine that produces at least 15000kN each and you're good to go. This means that your new 262 has the same endurance as the Korean War stuff, but also competing in terms of performance.
      At the end of the day, you want more engine power from the engine itself rather than from extra additions such as rockets to give it the much coveted continuous endurance (which is still in the minds of aircraft manufacturers till this day).
      Apart from that, the Me-262 looks absolutely good and solid. It's flight performance is still questionable compared to a Meteor. Remember that speed and speed alone isn't everything; you also need acceleration and maneuverability to be considered to be a good plane, which, I believe, the Meteor simply wins over the Schwalbe.

    • @peppapig9987
      @peppapig9987 Рік тому

      It had swept wings in one design, a well as a radar and night fighting rescources.
      This means that the Germans had the designs to make a 3rd gen jet in the 40's

    • @foxhound5985
      @foxhound5985 Рік тому +1

      @@thenathan4490 he was talking about the high speed version of the 262, HG2 and HG3 and according to wind tunnel tests, their performance would be close to the Korean war jets

    • @foxhound5985
      @foxhound5985 Рік тому +1

      @@thenathan4490 262 acceleration was marginally higher than the meteor

    • @theidioticgentleman4646
      @theidioticgentleman4646 Рік тому +4

      @@peppapig9987 that is literally the dumbest thing i have ever read, thankyou for the giggle good sir!

  • @vitsirosh3722
    @vitsirosh3722 Рік тому +52

    Those engines had a 20 hour life before replacement lol. Still beautiful and innovative

    • @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044
      @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Рік тому +7

      Lack of chrome and cobalt

    • @MichaelRoberts-t7c
      @MichaelRoberts-t7c Рік тому +8

      Lubrication was also a factor as normal oil could not survive the engine temps. The Germans invented synthetic oil to resolve this problem. Today's jet engines use a synthetic oil.

    • @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
      @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 5 днів тому

      US Army tests conducted during Operation LUSTY confirmed TBOs averaged 55 hours... better than Allied engines..

    • @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
      @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 5 днів тому

      @@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Germany hard a shortage of NICKEL which forced the switch to Chromium-based, Krupp P-198 _Chromadur_ alloy, a high temperature, creep resistant stainless alloy rated for 1,150 deg. F.
      P-198 is still used in jet engine production today and sold by ArcelorMittal as A286 alloy..
      any questions?

  • @pilotpug
    @pilotpug Рік тому +33

    Great vid. The animations are great, noticed this time you even had some Red Tails footage.
    Me163 and He162 next?
    Perhaps the Ar234 jet bomber which had radar equipped night fighter version can be featured too at some point?

  • @TheKulu42
    @TheKulu42 Рік тому +192

    Great video! The Me262 is one of my favorite WWII designs. It's so beautiful. You might find an essay in the book "If the Allies Had Fallen: Sixty Alternate Scenarios of World War II" interesting. In Chapter 13, "Hitler's Role", historian Gerhard L. Weinberg argues that the fighter wasn't too late; instead, it was too early. Given Germany's wartime situation, it didn't have the money or resources for working on experimental "wonder weapons" that might or might not work. In contrast, the Allies could put huge amounts money and resources into such projects; the atomic bomb being the prime example. Germany didn't have that luxury.

    • @Theaverageazn247
      @Theaverageazn247 Рік тому +1

      the germans were screwed. they had to fight the two largest super powers. The amount of stuff the us could make was about as much as the entire rest of the world combined. also there was no way to hurt americas production. USSR, UK, Japanese, and german industry could be bombed. GL hitting america

    • @StalinLovsMsmZioglowfagz
      @StalinLovsMsmZioglowfagz Рік тому +1

      Wait, how too early, again, other than just shouldn’t have happened for her? (Which I agree with).

    • @buhkaw
      @buhkaw Рік тому +8

      War back then was about innovation. Whoever had the best ideas would win. It wasn’t too early, it was just when it needed to be

    • @TheKulu42
      @TheKulu42 Рік тому +4

      @@buhkaw Yes, there was quite a lot of innovation. One of the Germany's main problems, I believe, was thinking the war would be short.

    • @xisotopex
      @xisotopex Рік тому +4

      @@TheKulu42 one of germanys main problems was that they didnt have enough fuel. all the innovation and wonder weapons in the world arent going to help. maybe they should have developed a 'wonder horse' to pull their 'mechanized' divisions....

  • @mark009vn
    @mark009vn Рік тому +7

    Hitler demanding a jabo version didn't delay the deployment of the 262 by much, contrary to popular beliefs. The demand for jabo capability is also somewhat understandable given that every luftwaffe fighters at the time also had jabo capability, in a way most ww2 fighters ended up having fighter bomber capability in one form or another, especially American ones.

    • @solid244
      @solid244 Рік тому +3

      Additionally, it was mandatory for all new fighter aircraft to be able to carry bombs.

  • @denroy3
    @denroy3 Рік тому +9

    At no point did this plane "nearly" win the war. It didn't even prolong it a day.

  • @gregHePilots
    @gregHePilots Рік тому +10

    I hate when things say Germany almost could have won the war. The german oil production was absolutely dismal by 1944. Pilots from British and American training were coming in at 400 hours+. New German pilots were coming with 1/4 of that because of fuel saving. They could have produced 9000 of these planes and it would have made zero difference because of fuel and training limitations.
    Its not a fun side to study but starting looking at the production numbers in ww2 and unless Germany got a nuke, it would never have ever been in their favor. When reading a higher call I think in 1943 the Luftwaffe was defending Sicily with 17 fighters vs the American and British combined 1000.

    • @paullooney2522
      @paullooney2522 Рік тому

      Yep and the usual suspects knew this,before they declared war on Germany,they knew that they could never get their hands on enough oil,regardless on what wounderwaffe they came up with.

    • @AdminAccount-cr2tb
      @AdminAccount-cr2tb Місяць тому

      Germany would had won the war no question if they had beaten the Russians. Lets put it this way: for starters oil would not have been a problem

    • @rc59191
      @rc59191 17 днів тому

      My favorite quote will always be amateurs talk tactics professionals talk logistics. Worked in logistics during my time as an Airman and work as a Quartermaster now with the Defense Militia. Once Germany stopped getting oil from Romania the party was over for them. Everyone keeps bringing up synthetic oil but I don't see how they could possibly make enough of it to fuel the Wehrmacht.

    • @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
      @DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 5 днів тому +1

      The Me-262 ran primarily on coal oil... it was developed because of the advantage of switching to available alternative fuels.

    • @gregHePilots
      @gregHePilots 5 днів тому

      @ yes but their training aircraft did not. A pilot must get training to have a chance in the air. The late stage German pilots were not the training they needed.

  • @vinrico6704
    @vinrico6704 Рік тому +8

    Hearing this master piece of engineering called the "me" 262 rather than "m e" 262 was shameful

    • @Fluffytoebeans
      @Fluffytoebeans Рік тому +2

      Exactly what I was thinking! I've noticed similar mistakes in other videos too! and it's a shame as it spoils an otherwise good video.

  • @DarthBaras13
    @DarthBaras13 Рік тому +8

    Thank you for adding footage from Red Tails. Some people liked it, some people didn't but you can't deny the CGI used in the aerial combat scenes especially against the Me-262.

    • @degnartsE
      @degnartsE Рік тому +2

      True, besides the physics breaking and the fact that even a sprinkle of 30mm would have dismantled those P-51s like a dropped lego set. Too bas they didn't model their HE shells

  • @ethannguyen498
    @ethannguyen498 Рік тому +19

    There were other developments of the ME-262 during the second world war, variants that would make the aircraft look incredibly modern and these variants being the HG series. Perhaps you can make a video of this? No rush.

  • @richardgaunt9417
    @richardgaunt9417 Рік тому +16

    Great video! If you are doing videos in more well-known aircraft, I recommend the Yakovlev Yak-28.

  • @Edax_Royeaux
    @Edax_Royeaux Рік тому +51

    The fate of German airspace was not up to the ME 262 just as the fate of the defense of Germany was not up to the Panzer VIII Maus.

    • @Lefffer
      @Lefffer Рік тому +3

      Not in 1944, but imagine if HC listened to galland in 1942 and produced nothing but 190s and 262s for their fighter roles.
      Lots needed to go right for the overall war effort for Germany but if the 262 was produced earlier in the war when Germany had access to the men and materials needed to field them in high number, the 262 would have dominated the skys east and west.

    • @Edax_Royeaux
      @Edax_Royeaux Рік тому +12

      @@Lefffer A reaction prompts a counter reaction. The Gloster Meteor was introduced 2 months after the 262 (and the Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star a little after the Meteor). If the 262 appears earlier then the Gloster Meteor becomes a higher priority for the RAF and they would be perhaps less worried about Meteors being shot down over Germany and reverse engineered, thus being more aggressive with them. The 262 is also fuel and resource hungry and would bleed the Luftwaffe to death sooner, thus perhaps ending the war quicker.

  • @canadianrobloxian74
    @canadianrobloxian74 Рік тому +6

    ah yes, the first jet fighter that shook the daydreams outta the allies

  • @TimInertiatic
    @TimInertiatic Рік тому +41

    The Meteor was developed in a similar time frame and introduced in 1944, but focus was on piston aircraft as they were so well developed and not really any 'worse' on the whole than early jets.
    You can't help that think that a shed load of FW190 would have been more of a problem than the 262

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 Рік тому +12

      Agreed. The 262's kill: losses ratio was 1 : 1.5, not very good.
      By comparison, the Tempest's kill : losses ratio was 7 : 1 on all types and 6 : 1 against single seaters.

    • @Gute_Laune_Boy
      @Gute_Laune_Boy Рік тому +1

      the thing with the overrated Tempest was, it was only at the right place at the right time, but it wasn't a really modern fighter plane during that time, nor was it a perfect one as others too.

    • @TimInertiatic
      @TimInertiatic Рік тому +7

      @@Gute_Laune_Boy it was pretty good! The Sea Fury was developed from it and that's pretty much the definitive piston engined fighter.
      But right place, right time is what you want. Jets weren't really competitive for another decade at least.
      Yes, on its day, a 262 could out perform anything. However, it sucked up resource and was only really useful in certain circumstances. A squadron of Tempests however could cause havoc reliably.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 Рік тому +2

      The first Meteor I with Welland engines had a speed of only 444mph when Derwent I were introduced the speed may have gotten to 460mph. It wasn't any faster than a Ta 152 or Spitfire XVIII or F.24. The Meteor III wasn't much faster because the Derwents were restricted as well. On top of that the navels produced shock drag and had to be enlarged and modified several times on both Meteor I and III. The result was that the Meteor wasn't a fast jet until after the war due to the engines and nacelle.

    • @wanderschlosser1857
      @wanderschlosser1857 Рік тому +2

      A FW190 wasn't really cheaper to make than a 262. Especially the jet engines were cheaper than the latest piston engines. Plus the fuel required for jets was much cheaper and easier to make as well. It made absolutely sense to build jet aircraft.
      But in reality the war situation made anything Germany did by then (1944) absolutely pointless. Even if focused on less complex but more numerous designs for aircraft, tanks or other equipment the war in Europe very likely would have ended in 1945 plus/minus 3-4 months. An extended war in Europe might also have concluded with a nuke like in Asia.

  • @Turkolini
    @Turkolini Рік тому +14

    One big issue for the ME 262 you failed to talk about was the fact Germany didn't have the Fuel to actually have a large scale fleet of ME 262s
    Cool design but it was way too little way too late and just therr weren't the resources for it

    • @barnykirashi
      @barnykirashi Рік тому +1

      By the way, the Me-262 ran on diesel.
      And by the design of Turbojets, it was essentially a TDI.

    • @wanderschlosser1857
      @wanderschlosser1857 Рік тому +3

      Jet fuel was at least easier to make than high octane piston engine fuel. But certainly, by the time Germany introduced its jets, the ship had long sailed, the war situation was absolutely hopeless for Germany from 1943/44 onwards.

    • @theslavicsailor6654
      @theslavicsailor6654 Рік тому

      If introduced earlier, they would. Also, jet fuel is theoretically easier to produce.

    • @denroy3
      @denroy3 Рік тому

      It's generally an asterisk, it did little to alter the war, except by Germany spending time, money and resources that should of went elsewhere

    • @denroy3
      @denroy3 Рік тому

      @@theslavicsailor6654 if? If? Then the US maybe nukes Berlin. It wasn't operational because it was in development.

  • @Redsnoopie1918
    @Redsnoopie1918 Рік тому +5

    Fun fact: the me 262 has a bad performance engine rather than a fast jet they got a not fast jet most of them getting shot down by a p51s.

    • @barefootbreezy6983
      @barefootbreezy6983 9 місяців тому

      262 was faster but most were shot during takeoff or landing because of its atrocious takeoff time.

  • @stevejones8660
    @stevejones8660 Рік тому +15

    Chuck Yeager when asked about the ME262, he relied: “First time I saw a jet, I shot it down.”

  • @koira6262
    @koira6262 11 місяців тому +2

    Titel: "nearly won the war"
    Video: "not nearly enough to change anything"
    XD ,nice video tho

  • @hauntified9060
    @hauntified9060 Рік тому +46

    Could you make videos on the german TA183 and the P1101 as well?They're pretty interesting aircraft.

  • @danielafreedman
    @danielafreedman Рік тому +6

    A great leap forward, but they drank a lot of fuel and had a limited range of flight. Also needed to take off from a cement runway so they used the Autobahn. Armed with rockets and piloted with experienced pilots they had a seven to one kill ratio!

  • @DefinitelyNotEmma
    @DefinitelyNotEmma Рік тому +35

    That aside, will there be a video on the Yak-41 in the future? It was a soviet VTOL project and even flew. Lockheed later purchased some of the technology used and utilized an improved version of the system in the F-35B.

    • @jarebare510
      @jarebare510 Рік тому +1

      Yes please, I love this plane.
      I want him to also clear up the ideas around people stealing the idea of a engine that turned down.

  • @hamzasherasmat6593
    @hamzasherasmat6593 Рік тому +1

    Pilot in Me-262: Ah these lovely fighters are going to win the war!
    Hitler: I WANT BOMBERS! NAI NAI NAI (7:53)

  • @smeghead666
    @smeghead666 Рік тому +6

    Great to see this channel blow up, just two things in this particular vid got me.
    As far as I know you don't pronounce aircraft names as one word, you pronounce each letter.
    For example you wouldn't call an FA-18 a 'fah eighteen' same for Me or He.
    secondly, 6:51 Imminent, not intimate lol

    • @Aiophgy
      @Aiophgy Рік тому +1

      I think he does that because it’s part of the name, kind of like Su-37 or Mi-8. F/A is pronounced “eff a”because it’s a designation for Fighter/Attack.

    • @Aiophgy
      @Aiophgy Рік тому

      Also like maybe it’s something with German and Russian where the first letters of the company get thrown in the name

    • @SomeOrdinaryJanitor
      @SomeOrdinaryJanitor Рік тому +3

      @@Aiophgy as far as i know, the only reason Russian planes names are pronounced whole, has to do with the Cyrillic language, where they pronounce Acronyms as words. like the PPSh, the russians would call it something closer to "Papesho" or "PaPashaw". the actual russian spelling is ППШ (Still PPSh) but the Ш is an english Sh.

    • @STEMCreativity
      @STEMCreativity Рік тому +1

      @@mitchelljakubka Agree - for example, I've never heard anybody pronounce the FW-190 as the "fuhwuh-190". Also, please, please, please, people who make videos about WW2 and Germany, for the love of god, learn some basic German pronunciation!! For example, "Luftwaffe" is pronounced "looft-vahfeh". The issue is, when you mispronounce these things, your credibility plummets. As soon as I hear things pronounced incorrectly, I switch off. It's the same in audio books. I'm amazed at how these authors/narrators don't make the effort to learn the correct pronunciations.

  • @jessicasamarita2181
    @jessicasamarita2181 8 місяців тому +1

    Fun fact: This plane was the inspiration for the Gloster meteor jet(AKA the First ever Allied jet. made to Combat the V1)

  • @Diego-zz1df
    @Diego-zz1df Рік тому +7

    One correction, which many probably already said: The Me-262 was never in a position to win the war for Germany.
    - Germany was already losing on all fronts when they were deployed.
    - They were never deployed in large enough numbers to make a noticeable impact, much less a decisive one.
    - Even if Germany managed to produce enough of them, they lacked the resources to deploy them in large numbers for a sustained period of time, since by then they were experiencing fuel shortages.
    - And even if they had the numbers and resources, it wasn't so advanced as to decisively outclass all other allied planes. There are stories of Me-262's engaging piston-engine fighters and managing to come out on top due to its altitude advantage and several problems with the Me-262.
    - Finally, the Me-262 did not maintain its technological superiority for that long. By the end of the war the allies were starting to field their own jet fighters.

    • @denroy3
      @denroy3 Рік тому +2

      Yep, it may have shortened the war by taking away resources, manpower and development.

    • @Diego-zz1df
      @Diego-zz1df Рік тому

      @@denroy3 No, that's not what I'm saying.

    • @5co756
      @5co756 Рік тому

      ​@@Diego-zz1dfThere was nothing fielded after the war , many years of testing and upgrading . The F-80 in 1948 was the first jet fighter build in large numbers , the Gloster Meteor in I think 1947 . The first Meteor was ready in 1944 sure , but hardly faster than props .
      Meanwhile the Germans got the Me262 HG1 and HG2 ready , the war was lost in 1942 no question . But the jet fighter race the Germans won and we don't talk about their other projects . Horten 229 , He 162 and the Me163 .

    • @Sachiel-Imaizumi
      @Sachiel-Imaizumi 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@5co756 wow ok there is so much to unpack here, the first gloster meteor was ready in 1943, and it entered service in 1944, it was much faster then props, and it quickly became faster then the Me-262, the meteors broke 962 km/h by 1945 and the me-262 still went around 890-900, apart from that the F-80 was ready in 1944, and entered service in 1945 where it was also faster then the Me-262, at 955 km/h, the only allied nation of the big 3 that didnt have a jet ready and in service by the end of the war was the soviets with the MiG-9 which first took to the air in 1946, so...yeah..while it was the first jet, and rather innovative, it fell off real quick by stuff fielded and upgrade (in the case of the meteor) after the war, so yeah, there was stuff fielded after the war, not sure where you got the idea that there was nothing.

    • @5co756
      @5co756 11 місяців тому

      @@Sachiel-Imaizumi It was July 1944 and the F.1 was hardly any faster than late props , 460mph (740kph)top speed . The F.3 in November 1945 broke the speed record of 970kph , the war was already over . The Germans were out of game long time ago , the Me262 got no major upgrades wich were also planned . And the US got the P-80 wich also saw no combat in WW2 , only four were send to Europe wich two of them crashed and killed the pilots. Two were send back and one of them also crashed in the US , the F-80C went into service in 1948 . You don't even know the correct names and you wanna tell me something ? 😅
      Both the Gloster Meteor and the F-80 were outdated as they went into service , no swept wings wich are essential for high speeds as the Germans discovered . Both got smoked in the Korean War by Mig15's , the F-86 Sabre was the real deal .
      The Meteor broke some speed records, but that's it . The F1 and even the F3 wouldn't had any chance against the Me262 in flight performance, wich is a reason why it saw no combat over Germany .

  • @RTWPimpmachine
    @RTWPimpmachine Рік тому +1

    The Me-262 did not come close to "winning the war" lmao.

  • @eelvis7169
    @eelvis7169 Рік тому +1

    Plane was amazing but too late. War was already lost

  • @Senor0Droolcup
    @Senor0Droolcup Рік тому +28

    The real reason that the Me262 arrived “too little too late“ was the chronic delays in perfecting production of the Jumo jet engines. Hitler’s stupid and contradictory orders were very unhelpful, but even if he had Supported the fighter version from the very beginning, the plane would still have evolved as it did simply because there were not enough reliable jet engines to equip more than the handful of planes that actually flew.

    • @AjitMD
      @AjitMD Рік тому +4

      Germans would have needed to develop and mass produce their jet engines and places in peace time because of the huge need for heat resistant allows... Ni, Cr, W, alloyed steel. Plus the precession machine tools need to manufacture turbine and compressor component to tight tolerances, etc. Plus the number required of long range fighters and bombers, fuel requirements.

    • @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044
      @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Рік тому +2

      Lack of chrome and cobalt

  • @Winhert
    @Winhert Рік тому +2

    nearly won the war when allies already had jets flying over italy in non-combat roles ... 🥱

  • @PacificSouthwestAir
    @PacificSouthwestAir 2 місяці тому +2

    has anyone noticed that this plane looks like the 737-200

  • @krisskross9994
    @krisskross9994 Рік тому +23

    Good morning hope everyone’s having a good day so far

    • @mrhappy3814
      @mrhappy3814 Рік тому +2

      how did you comment 58 minutes ago if the video was sent 21 minutes ago?

    • @krisskross9994
      @krisskross9994 Рік тому +3

      I commented whilst it was waiting to premiere

  • @cesaravegah3787
    @cesaravegah3787 Рік тому +1

    The Me262 not only didn't was even nearly to won the war, it failed to make any significative difference.

  • @netquit6880
    @netquit6880 Рік тому +3

    2:35 you forgot to say that with every update comes new portion of leaked classivied miliatry files

  • @EmihleSibiya_144
    @EmihleSibiya_144 Рік тому +3

    Always great to see a new video 🙂

  • @newenglandexpansionistsoci2613

    Bugatti 100P.
    An incredible design that deserves some love.

  • @blitzzkrieg1400
    @blitzzkrieg1400 Рік тому +3

    That clip from Inglorious Basterds really made me laugh

  • @GreasyFingers
    @GreasyFingers Рік тому +1

    Great production!
    In Messerschmitt the double-s in Messer is pronounced exactly like in the word mess.
    The sch in schmitt is pronounced like the sh in short or ship.
    You did it right a couple of times and wrong a couple of others.
    Cheers,
    Johannes

  • @natev7870
    @natev7870 Рік тому +9

    Everytime he claims "X plane/project could've turned the tides for the Germans" it feels like a Werhaboo with no understanding of the immense manpower and material difference between the Axis and Allies. "Amateurs talk strategy, professionals talk logistics" Gen. Bradley

    • @steffenjonda8283
      @steffenjonda8283 Рік тому

      And smart people understand that the idea of air war change fundamentally if the R4M, a cheap easy rocket is developed in 1940.
      Then the yankeeaboos explain to me how the allies bomb the german production and transport system, the german cities... :D
      THAT is the wonderweapon you need to change ww2.
      With it every german plane can kill easily the allied bombers... think about this:
      say in 1942 you want to bomb a german areal but know, if you try to do so you loose 90% of your bombers in any mission you fly and your enemy loose 1/3 of their planes to OTL.
      Why? because the germans no longer need to put tons of HEAVY 30mm-guns on their planes... even the Me109F can now easily kill heavy bombers without getting into the allied defence fire :D

    • @christopherscott932
      @christopherscott932 23 дні тому

      What in the FH is a werhaboo? Get off the internet dude

  • @stefan5469
    @stefan5469 11 місяців тому +1

    6:22 wie er schwalbe ausgesprochen hat 🤦🏻😂

  • @craddocraddoc
    @craddocraddoc 6 місяців тому +7

    The title is so misleading. It should be "The Nazi super plane that was too late and by far not good enough to even make a slight upward dent in the rapid loss of the war".

  • @musicloverfallout
    @musicloverfallout Рік тому +1

    The treaty of Versailles was completely unfair, no need to “quote on quote” that

  • @ThomasHaberkorn
    @ThomasHaberkorn Рік тому +6

    nearly won hardly anything

  • @lavrentizapadni747
    @lavrentizapadni747 Рік тому +10

    Adolf Galland described flying the Me 262 as "though an angel were pushing."

    • @igameidoresearchtoo6511
      @igameidoresearchtoo6511 Рік тому +2

      Not flying, but instead described the engines with this sentence, because he saw no prop and only a high pitched sound was all the noise unlike pistons which vibrated and sounded loud throughout the flight.

  • @legendary_a4
    @legendary_a4 Рік тому +5

    Great videos. I love all your vids and especially the ones on current and non prototype aircrafts. Also amazing models. Everything is great about your channel.
    Btw, a quick question about the War thunder sponsor, how long does it last and does it activate right after you download the game?

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  Рік тому +1

      Thank you for being a viewer.
      For Wathunder the deal is always ongoing for new players.

  • @doodoo66
    @doodoo66 7 місяців тому +1

    Fun fact. The ME-262 was never going to work. I didn't want to go into it but not only was it not the first jet but it was a pretty shit jet.

  • @tomschmeichel1890
    @tomschmeichel1890 Рік тому +7

    IMO the first fighter jet ever was the coolest fighter jet ever.

    • @barefootbreezy6983
      @barefootbreezy6983 9 місяців тому

      Cough cough f22 raptor.

    • @thekraken1173
      @thekraken1173 7 місяців тому

      @@barefootbreezy6983 Cough cough F35C with Chrome Mirror Infrared Coating

    • @barefootbreezy6983
      @barefootbreezy6983 7 місяців тому

      @@thekraken1173 f22 still king of sky

  • @josephsheranda
    @josephsheranda Рік тому +2

    Please add a link to the interview of Hanna Reitsch; she was a Me 262 test pilot, and the first woman to fly a jet aircraft. Her first hand description of her first test flight, "The speed was absolutely intoxicating!"

    • @jgunther3398
      @jgunther3398 Рік тому +1

      remarkable woman, demonized because you know why

    • @josephsheranda
      @josephsheranda Рік тому

      @@jgunther3398 It's possible to acknowledge accomplishments without endorsing the agenda. Some people can't separate the two.

  • @MrManianek
    @MrManianek Рік тому +12

    The video title is a clickbait. Me262 couldn't win the war.

    • @algotstaaf5932
      @algotstaaf5932 12 днів тому

      Well it says nearly so technically right :D

  • @ShaSam_Officials
    @ShaSam_Officials Рік тому +1

    Just amazing work, keep improving your content Mr. Found and Explained! ⚜️⚡️

  • @randomdeadpool
    @randomdeadpool Рік тому +4

    Zeigt keine Gnade!

  • @looky-looky8836
    @looky-looky8836 5 місяців тому +1

    If the European war continued into August 1945, you would have seen Silver Plate B-29s escorted by P80 jets over Germany. And that, would be the end of that.

  • @TSlambrose
    @TSlambrose Рік тому +3

    Did you recently update your graphics? They look great!

  • @chasebellmeyer7368
    @chasebellmeyer7368 Рік тому

    “Nearly won the war” lmfao

  • @autarchprinceps
    @autarchprinceps Рік тому +19

    "There is simply nothing comparable?" - I don't know, the British had jet fighters at a relatively comparable state of development, they were just not desperate enough to put them into frontline action, and wanted to avoid any crashing over enemy territory to be taken apart by the enemy, so mostly used them over British territory defensively, particularly agains V1s, while gaining experience with jet plane handling characteristics without risking their best aces and building up their numbers to a point, where if necessary they would actually matter.
    That's the problem with all these Wunderwaffen non-sense. It isn't that the allies didn't have amazing new inventions of their own, sometimes even in the same area, they just didn't have to use prototypes on the frontline, at least later in the war, and what they got from Germany after victory gave them complementary technology that together with their own created that seeming sudden burst in perceived technological capability.

    • @Beorninki
      @Beorninki Рік тому

      That is true. This channel is mix both truth and bullshit.

    • @khylebaguingan8211
      @khylebaguingan8211 Рік тому

      Luckily the germans didn't have enough fuel to run these weapons.. and enough steel and metals to build them.....

    • @autarchprinceps
      @autarchprinceps Рік тому +4

      @@khylebaguingan8211 And enough factories, factory workers, pilots, ground crews, ...

    • @khylebaguingan8211
      @khylebaguingan8211 Рік тому

      @@autarchprinceps there being bomb everywhere

  • @mab2187
    @mab2187 Рік тому +7

    I love these analyses and history of a vehicle keep it up. P.S can ya do one on the JF-17?

  • @maxshelby8245
    @maxshelby8245 Рік тому +3

    Please consider doing a P51 video!
    Such legend needs recognition haha

  • @angelomendoza1174
    @angelomendoza1174 Рік тому +2

    The Messerschmitt Me 262 jet fighter is a world's first, It's second place is the Gloster Meteor British fighter plane.

  • @Barb5001
    @Barb5001 Рік тому +6

    Fact is, the ME 262 was introduce too late in the war and was plagued with problems that made it not much of a threat.
    A couple of month later the UK introduced their jet fighter and a few weeks after that so did the US
    The 262 gets all the press solely because it was the first operational jet fighter

    • @appliedengineering4001
      @appliedengineering4001 Рік тому +2

      It's not just the first operational jet fighter. It was the engine type they used. The Americans and Brits had the Centrifugal Jet engine. The Germans on the other hand had the Axial-Flow jet engine that we use today.

    • @anirudhhhh
      @anirudhhhh Рік тому

      It was at the end of the war. The Germans were low on resources and definitely did not have access to all the necessary metals to improve the jet engines. Despite the short comings it proved to be an amazing fighter plane with a kill ratio that was actually good.
      Hitlers insistence on using it as a bomber essentially handicapping the jet and lack of good pilots because of attrition sealed the fate.
      Also the German jet engine design is what we use in modern jets not the British design.

    • @Vegito_Fanpage
      @Vegito_Fanpage Рік тому

      @@presidenteden6498 Adolf Galland was completely wrong then.

  • @csmeinert
    @csmeinert Рік тому +1

    Like so many German Wunder Waffe they took too long to develop them and they created too many thus dividing and wasting resources. Hitler meddled in design decisions and they tried to fight a war on two fronts. It's these factors that lost Germany the war!

  • @hudsongray5091
    @hudsongray5091 Рік тому +3

    I have the squadron version in war thunder and it’s quite good against propeller aircraft pilots but you mostly fight Cold War jets and even stuff like mig 15s and F-86 Sabres that’s are better than the 262 in most ways

  • @Iknowtoomuchable
    @Iknowtoomuchable Рік тому +2

    "The first time I saw a jet, I shot it down."
    -Chuck Yeager

    • @steffenjonda8283
      @steffenjonda8283 Рік тому

      So what?
      This is the quote of a man who did what?
      The german jets were no ÜBER-weapons... but they mean you cannot defend your bombers, esp. if these jets come 2 years earlier and esp. if the R4M-rockets come in 4 years earlier...
      Just think about it.

    • @thekenneth8232
      @thekenneth8232 Рік тому +1

      ​@@steffenjonda8283Try saying all that garbage without crying, Steffi 😂

  • @lilyucai
    @lilyucai Рік тому +4

    At 0:41 the radio chatter is actually German artillery call from war thunder

  • @SuperCrabCraft
    @SuperCrabCraft Рік тому +1

    7:30 The Sturmvogel could be roughly translated as thunderbird, sturm meaning storm and vogel meaning bird.

  • @ugamer6581
    @ugamer6581 Рік тому +3

    This is first jet fighter plane.This is one of a great technology at that time

  • @wobc1872
    @wobc1872 11 місяців тому

    00:45 - it has finally happened!!!!! An English history documentary that correctly pronounces "Messerschmitt!!
    THANK YOU!!!!!!
    You have given me back hope in humanity 🥰😍😍😍🤩🤩🤩

  • @Crispy_Crisp
    @Crispy_Crisp Рік тому +3

    please do he162 video about the ejection seat it had

  • @tomtd
    @tomtd Рік тому +1

    Miss allocated resources, by virtue of which it lost them the war, same goes for the tiger and its terrible reliability, weight and resource demands.

  • @970357ers
    @970357ers Рік тому +3

    M.E. or Me? Saying it as an acronym rather than intitalisation sounds weird.

  • @stevefox7566
    @stevefox7566 9 місяців тому +1

    By the time the Me 262 came into production, the German manufacturing capabilities were in shambles. And these early generation jet engines needed to be completely rebuilt practically every other time they were flown. Lack of Jet fuel and experienced pilots were an issue by that time as well.

  • @AubriGryphon
    @AubriGryphon Рік тому +10

    Why are you putting scare quotes around "unfair"? The Treaty of Versailles absolutely was unfair, deliberately so. The Allied Powers' eagerness to punish Germany for WWI led directly to the rise of the Nazi party.

  • @spyridon3089
    @spyridon3089 Рік тому +2

    "The Nazi super plane that nearly won the war," what a crappy title. Too late, too few, no fuel......

  • @artrandy
    @artrandy Рік тому +11

    The title is a sensationalist misnomer. With approximately only 500 unverifiable kills to its name (German pilots just claimed what they liked), versus the enormous cost of the design and development, and constant replacement of those engines, added to an unknown number of losses to its own pilots, due to engine malfunction, lack of pilot training, and kills by the allies, the title is only a fantasy, probably based on lots of ifs and buts, that had circumstances been different, It would all have been much more fantastic than it was, and we can all have those moments. However, its best to live in reality, than through garish comics........

    • @Joop.23-2-63
      @Joop.23-2-63 Рік тому +1

      Couldn't said it better. Nearly won the war😂

  • @HellenicWolf
    @HellenicWolf Рік тому +1

    AMAZING WORK, BROMAN. GOOD DAMN WORK.

  • @HeadhunterKev96
    @HeadhunterKev96 Рік тому +3

    Yeah, back to awesome German pronunciation! :D

  • @TheHotshothowitzer-saychees3
    @TheHotshothowitzer-saychees3 7 місяців тому

    Imagine someone flexing on you with their car then you pull out one of these lol.

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 Рік тому +4

    Wow 😳, also German Engineering

    • @dannypipewrench533
      @dannypipewrench533 Рік тому

      Germans sure are good at making hot expanding gas become hot and start expanding.

  • @fizkallnyeilsem
    @fizkallnyeilsem Рік тому +2

    5:09 Credits for you man for not censoring the Nazi Swastika for realism purposes, i feel really immersed and could totallt picture what it lookz like had it been used effectively

  • @prosto_potomuwto
    @prosto_potomuwto Рік тому +1

    Except war is not in the sky. Because earth is flat.

  • @thewampire4640
    @thewampire4640 4 місяці тому +3

    Germany could never had won the war, and this plane did not "nearly" win it

    • @Komrad_Yuri
      @Komrad_Yuri 2 місяці тому +1

      Wrong about the first part. Right about the second.

  • @Darkbeholder091
    @Darkbeholder091 Рік тому

    "What is that?"
    "What the hell was that?"
    "It went by like we we're standing still!"

  • @khylebaguingan8211
    @khylebaguingan8211 Рік тому +4

    Good weapon... Problem is very few are made ,and lack of resources hinders there production.. Even if took down hundreds of bombers ,the Allies can easily replace there losses

  • @midwestguy1983
    @midwestguy1983 2 місяці тому

    problematic engines, over engineered, little fuel, too few trained pilots, it nearly won nothing

  • @Jungle_Studio
    @Jungle_Studio Рік тому +3

    Imagine saying I own a jet. And it's nazi

    • @Jungle_Studio
      @Jungle_Studio Рік тому +2

      @@lemster101 well everyone will frown saying someone has a Nazi jet. But without Nazis. Alot of the stuff we take for granted today wouldn't of been made or implemented. Or used on the scale it's used today. We have to give props to the Nazis for what they did in advancing technology. And hey. It's the first operation jet and it's pretty badass.

  • @jeffreyb8770
    @jeffreyb8770 11 місяців тому +1

    Nearly won the war? Against formations of 1,000 bombers and 700 escort fighters?

  • @raz562
    @raz562 Рік тому +6

    It’s a shame a channel as popular as yours is perpetuating false history..
    Messerschmitt knew months in advance that their 262 was to be a fighter able to carry bombs, before “Hitlers crazy proclamation”, that, supposedly, single handily led to the delayed introduction of the Me 262.
    After all, how long does it take to design a few hard point and pylons?
    Hope you do better in the future

  • @OfficialDoggyYT
    @OfficialDoggyYT Рік тому +2

    5:56 why does it it say MK-101 and not MK-108

  • @KrokLP
    @KrokLP Рік тому +4

    "Near the end of WW2"
    First flight: 1942

  • @jonathanrichwine1996
    @jonathanrichwine1996 Рік тому +1

    The ME-262 did not nearly win the war. Not even close. It came too late, too few were built and Germany couldn’t sustain them due to the loss of most of their best pilots and their inability to get oil to fuel the jets

  • @hphp31416
    @hphp31416 Рік тому +3

    it was German fighter, nazi political party had no aircraft manufacturing capabilities

  • @bobbybrooks4826
    @bobbybrooks4826 Рік тому +2

    Hitler was always shooting himself in the foot.... truly many times MANY ways... THIS WAS NO COINCIDENCE.....

  • @MeeesterBond17
    @MeeesterBond17 8 місяців тому

    0:42 No, it wasn't the first jet fighter. The Gloster Meteor had it's maiden flight in 1941, when the Me-262 was still a propeller driven proof of concept. It wouldn't be jet powered until 1942.
    You could perhaps argue it was the first *operational* jet fighter.

  • @paulyoung2308
    @paulyoung2308 Рік тому +1

    The last surviving jet is in the South African war museum.

  • @jumaclo
    @jumaclo Рік тому

    Props for showing footage from the “Red tails” movie

  • @ZETAPLUSA70
    @ZETAPLUSA70 Рік тому +1

    This plane basically is the real life MS-14 Gelgoog from Gundam