To be honest, The Client I don't think is going to see quite as much play as you would think, it's more then likely a sideboard card for blue control, that's certain, but aside that it may never get actually played.. based on my testing anyway, its only really good in the super agro matchup. And keep in mind it does take an action, and that action does expire if they do manage to prevent you from getting the unit. expect them to sideboard sentinels to sap you of an action and prevent you from filling the bounty. It also does require a more advanced board situation which only really occurs in agro weanie matchups.
The Client looks so good. I hadn't looked at it from all the angles you pointed out, it does look insanely powerful in a number of decks for a lot of different reasons.
Yes but at the cost of paying extra resources so at the cost of tempo. Tempo in exchange for card advantage has not been worth it in SWU so far. With that being said some smuggle cards are just very good.
I’m curious about the new Falcon in a Han green deck. Han green does want to run something in the 6 cost slot, but it’s kind of a backup to your 7 resource combo turn and you can’t afford to keep a ton of cards in hand all the time, so that 6 cost slot can be a little awkward I think. With the new Falcon, you can resource this card early and then if your Han gets exhausted or killed on your combo turn and you can’t get that 7th resource, you have this new Falcon as a backup from your resource row to play. You’re of course very experienced with Han, so I’m curious what you think about this! I’m looking forward to at least trying it out.
That's a very good point, and maybe that's enough to justify the card. With that being said I am not particularly excited for a 5/5 for 6 when compared to a skirmisher 4/6 ambush that gives you a card. In theory smuggle card should be very good in Han but excepted L3-37 none of them are pushed enough that I would want to run them.
I don't think that "The client" is a good card for control deck cause it's too slow but with "GI" or even better "Bossk" leaders, it seems to be good!!
Vigilance at 6 is good vs aggro but a 3 drop that heals 5 per turn is too slow??? It's only a 3 drop, it does not need to have an immediate effect. and as I said in the video he just needs to use his ability once to be super worth it and he is likely going to do it multiple times per game. This card is an absolute auto-include in control in my opinion.
@@Thorrk_THT Vigilance has 2 effects against aggro (heal and kill). And even for 6 is good cause well timed with the damages you took (turn 5). The Client played on turn 2 can only been activated on turn 3 if it's alive but here a lot of decks can deal with it and you don't have 5 damages (perharps except sometimes against aggro). Besides you have to kill the unit, so for control it means play another card. The client played on turn 4 could only be used on turn 5 like Vigilance but on this turn (4) for 3 ressources, it would probably be the only card you could play and control has better cards... The client played after these turns is too situational and has to face a lot of threats... So yes, i think that The client is too slow (perharps a little bit) in a control deck but can be great in others like GI leader or Bossk leader (5x2 is a thing...).
Do you watch star wars? Book of Boba Fett is actually a good fun series, and thats where you learn to pronounce Krrsantan. I dont trust star wars players who dont watch the movies and series lol except for the rey, pass on that for sure
I think your revisit will be an adjustment up on quite a few of these cards
To be honest, The Client I don't think is going to see quite as much play as you would think, it's more then likely a sideboard card for blue control, that's certain, but aside that it may never get actually played.. based on my testing anyway, its only really good in the super agro matchup. And keep in mind it does take an action, and that action does expire if they do manage to prevent you from getting the unit. expect them to sideboard sentinels to sap you of an action and prevent you from filling the bounty. It also does require a more advanced board situation which only really occurs in agro weanie matchups.
Great overview of these new cards!!
The Client looks so good. I hadn't looked at it from all the angles you pointed out, it does look insanely powerful in a number of decks for a lot of different reasons.
A critical mass of smuggle cards could theoretically make smuggle equivalent to card-draw, imo
Yes but at the cost of paying extra resources so at the cost of tempo. Tempo in exchange for card advantage has not been worth it in SWU so far. With that being said some smuggle cards are just very good.
Merci pour la vidéo !
I’m curious about the new Falcon in a Han green deck. Han green does want to run something in the 6 cost slot, but it’s kind of a backup to your 7 resource combo turn and you can’t afford to keep a ton of cards in hand all the time, so that 6 cost slot can be a little awkward I think.
With the new Falcon, you can resource this card early and then if your Han gets exhausted or killed on your combo turn and you can’t get that 7th resource, you have this new Falcon as a backup from your resource row to play.
You’re of course very experienced with Han, so I’m curious what you think about this! I’m looking forward to at least trying it out.
That's a very good point, and maybe that's enough to justify the card. With that being said I am not particularly excited for a 5/5 for 6 when compared to a skirmisher 4/6 ambush that gives you a card.
In theory smuggle card should be very good in Han but excepted L3-37 none of them are pushed enough that I would want to run them.
Feels like Han needs to affect the board on 6 or he can fall too far behind, and not being to trade off a firespray is a huge problem.
New Millenium Falcon can be good for Lando (probably as a finisher) -> 5/5 in space for 4 looks ok
Yeah in this case I am more in doubt with Lando's capabilities, but I hope to be wrong.
What is grenagusta?
I like the character, the art and concept of the client, but I am torned, I don't know if I am more excited or worried about him
yeah very strong cards have that effect ^^
Would Lando's ability give smuggle to cards that don't already have it?
No it just reduce the cost of a card that already has smuggle at the cost of defeating a resource permanently.
I don't think that "The client" is a good card for control deck cause it's too slow but with "GI" or even better "Bossk" leaders, it seems to be good!!
Vigilance at 6 is good vs aggro but a 3 drop that heals 5 per turn is too slow???
It's only a 3 drop, it does not need to have an immediate effect. and as I said in the video he just needs to use his ability once to be super worth it and he is likely going to do it multiple times per game.
This card is an absolute auto-include in control in my opinion.
@@Thorrk_THT Vigilance has 2 effects against aggro (heal and kill). And even for 6 is good cause well timed with the damages you took (turn 5).
The Client played on turn 2 can only been activated on turn 3 if it's alive but here a lot of decks can deal with it and you don't have 5 damages (perharps except sometimes against aggro). Besides you have to kill the unit, so for control it means play another card.
The client played on turn 4 could only be used on turn 5 like Vigilance but on this turn (4) for 3 ressources, it would probably be the only card you could play and control has better cards...
The client played after these turns is too situational and has to face a lot of threats...
So yes, i think that The client is too slow (perharps a little bit) in a control deck but can be great in others like GI leader or Bossk leader (5x2 is a thing...).
Do you watch star wars? Book of Boba Fett is actually a good fun series, and thats where you learn to pronounce Krrsantan. I dont trust star wars players who dont watch the movies and series lol except for the rey, pass on that for sure