Why the US Airforce is about to get a serious upgrade...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2023
- Love this video? Support the channel by clicking this link + 10% off your first site and domain at Square Space!
www.squarespace.com/found
NEW CHANNEL:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained
WE ENTERING ACE COMBAT WITH THIS ONE!!! 🔥🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🗣️
Gründe... i mean Lokheed Martin: allow us to introduce ourselves
Hello? Can I order 5 Arsenal birds please
@@koharumi1 Sorry, but i think the order you asked for is out of items you ordered
>
2040 is exactly when ace combat 3 takes place and the f15 is STILL in use then 💀💀💀
F15 and B52: STILL OPERATIONAL
and STILL PRODUCING
Still delivering and this should say a lot to those congressmen and the current way of ordering new units
If this video had been made 40 years ago who would have predicted that the F-15, F-18, F-16, B-52, A-`10, C-2 Greyhound, E-2 Hawkeye, AV-8 Harrier, Chinook , C-130 would all still be in frontline service?
They fulfill their roles pretty good, so why replace them? Especially when your rivals aren't replacing their aircraft?
A-10s would be gone by 2029 and C-2 Greyhound would be replaced by the MV-22 Osprey but for the others like the F-16, F-15 and B-52 Their not going anytime soon anyways…
the b52 will outlive us all
@@AbhijeetKunduf16xl was competitor to f15e so with the adoption of the f15e they're not going to use f16xl anymore
CANT replace the Human Element no Matter how Advanced AI gets it will always lack that.
Im now imagining a biplane made of titanium with an afterburning engine
X-49 night raven
@@jackwynia428 Ace Combat really has done everything...
I think all combat aircraft will eventually be remotely operated. Keeping highly trained and skilled pilots alive makes far more sense both in cost and logistics. Given the current state of technology where even hobbyists can fly RC planes and aircraft with VR headsets giving them an FPV view, there's no reason for any combat aircraft to be manned.
Agreed
I think the biggest hurdle to clear for a remote operated fighter jet is the uplink speed between the controls and the airframe, with loitering drones launching guided munitions a little delay is acceptable, but in a dogfight you would want the control input to be acted on nearly instantly.
the risk of losing one's life will probably discourage militaries to add more unmanned machines
if you have nothing to lose, you'd probably not care if you lost a fight/aircraft/entire city worth of millions lives
I dont think war is sth you wanna do from the comfort of your home, that would be when people send pipe bombs with RC cars to the neighbors
Security. The last thi g you want is your state of the art combat platform hacked and either used against you or your allies
Latency
A Knot is a nautical mile per hour. Knot per hour is like saying a MPH/H
As a side note, Knot per Hour or MPH/H would be units of acceleration rather than speed.
The B21 isn’t for sale to any US allies. It was discussed with Australia and Northrop Grumman, but that was stated to premature as it would require and act of the US congress to even to allow Australia to test it
They desperately need it. How are the ozzies supposed to deploy low-observable drop bears across the Pacific theater without a stealth bomber?
It's a bit amazing that the humble Huey has been able to be upgraded and modernized and for 60 years but the Blackhawk is on its way out.
Requesting videos on the following:
-switchblade aircraft designs such as the FA-37 Talon from the ‘05 movie “Stealth” or the X-02 Wyvern from the Ace Combat franchise (the concept, not the actual fighters I mentioned)
-Super Tomcat-21 and ASF-14
-the NATF program as a whole
-early ATF proposals/McDonnell Douglas’ ATF proposal
-Sea Apache
-F-20 Tigershark
-Bae SABA
-Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Technology Bomber proposal
-Northrop’s proposal for what would become the F-117 Nighthawk
-Interstate TDR
-JSF proposals OTHER THAN the X-32 and X-35
-XFV-12
-Gloster Meteor
-the proposals that didn’t win the F-X program that spawned the F-15 Eagle
-Erado E.555
-model 853 quiet bird
-the USSR’s Project P-2 submarine
Just thought I'd let you know, "Knots per hour" is an acceleration measurement. The knot is a speed measurement, and is equal to one nautical mile per hour.
It’s interesting how much the newest “Air Superiority Fighter” looks so similar to the rumored F-19 from the early 1990s, that apparently has never existed.
its all BS - the 90s were the last time to get excited about new USAF public/white world technology - now they just hide everything and label it black
"Never existed" and "never conceptualized" are not the same
The US Navy's F/A-XX is the one often shown with canards, while the Air Force's NGAD is more delta shaped and with no vertical stabilizers. But since we only have renders I'm just happy to see any concept.
That V-280 looks nice. Always loved the Osprey, looks like a great successor. I do wonder how thirsty and noisy the Bell will be.
I believe the Sikorsky S-97 Raider would be a BETTER choice than the Bell V-280 Valor
@@SagatBordyev The Raider looks like a very nice heli, not a tiltrotor though. The Bell has got it beat on many things. I guess it depends if the US is fine with the added complexity if it gives them more speed and range.
4:48 before thanksgiving
4:45 after thanksgiving
The future of the USAF is really interesting. But I'm really worried about the future of the German Luftwaffe.
F35A + Eurofighter
And hopefully the german defense ministry gets their shithouse in order
AMERICA!!! *eagle sounds*🦅🦅🦅🦅🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
I remember when this channel didn’t do clickbait.
3:52 Nah. the B-52's gonna be afloat untill the end of humanity....
It’s going to be the Modern version of Noah ark
Knots per hour does not exist. 1 knot equals to 1.85 km/h. The V280 speed is 280 knots.
@@cockneyse well, yes, however nobody uses it
Hey F&E, maybe you should make a vid about the US Airforce's NGAD & its Collaborative Wingman Drones or other sorts like u finished the Navy's 6th Gen in the past. Love the vids💯
Can't wait for the ""official"" reveal of the Aurora in 2049
Hey fae, could you do a Video about the west german mbb firefly Programm?
Honestly with all those 3d models Found And Explained gotta has laying around, he _needs_ to do vehicle battle animations! (One Leg Tank vs NGAD when?)
Knots per hour? now thats new
Video suggestion: a video about the Novi Avion a Yugoslav checkmate (btw love your videos)
Pilots are on the way out... which I don't know if that is good or not. On one hand AI can make decisions in microseconds which the human brain cannot do. However... human pilots have a moral compass which I think is a plus.
They will probably go with a hybrid system where the AI is the pilot then a remote forward air controller does a handshake link and actually pulls the trigger, especially in attack aircraft danger CAS scenarios.
Future airforce will be B-21 bombers, B-21 derived air controllers,s unmanned fuel dispensers, and air combat drones
All coordinated with spy and communication satellite constellations in LOE which will essentially eliminate the fog of war and offer a real time picture of entire battlefields. Then of course with the new feasibility of reusable rocket boosters, orbital resupply to hot spots is possible within a matter of hours or even minutes instead of days. Orbit is the new high ground after all.
Minor correction knots per hour is redundant, knots is nautical miles per hours
WOW, never thought of 2 videos in 3 days was possible
Where do you get the information for the concept planes? Day 3
Nice video!
IF we survive that long 😂
Could you do this with other nations? + the v280 looks like something out of avatar 😭
I believe the Sikorsky S-97 Raider would be a BETTER choice than the Bell V-280 Valor
What does knots/hour mean? Knots are already a unit of speed.
Another 1 trillion dollar aircraft
so smooth
Didn’t list the Apache replacement. That looked sick too.
my local airbase is the training base of the f15EX, its fun having em fly overhead
WE ENTERING FALCON 5.0 WITH THIS ONE!!!🔥🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🗣️
All i can imagine, is if the USAF developed one very reliable aircraft like B-52 and F-15 in the Future, we might gonna see theese planes be in service for who knows, hundreds or even thousands of years.
No they would get outdated within a hundred years. A thousand years is definitely a stretch.
There are two NGAD programs. One for USAF and another for the Navy.
Description of the first one is a bit lackluster since the program is meant to be way more than a manned aircraft.
And if it's about the future air force, way more programs would deserve a mention: CCA, Golden Horde, Skyborg, Gremlin, Longshot, FARA, and many more
So true, this new drone swam tech that's coming out will put most manned air assets except the B-21 out of work, even those will have to come up with a visual and IR masking technology to avoid being tracked from LEO. Golden Horde systems integration is especially impressive when considering advanced personnel carried drones that only weigh around 1kg like Teal 2 are just in their infancy!
US: Look at our new aircraft!
Russia: We have a death star, but it's just invisible
Ghost bat has serious BAe p.125 vibes. Except that was a zero line of sight, reclined seat cockpit.
Here the modern warships players that knew about this aircrafts long time ago
SR-72 already probably flying? The SR-71 would have never been retired without it's replacement in service. That, is a given.
Please make a video about tu 128
Ghost Bat, Valkyrie, Stingray, Dark horse, Quarter horse & Fury are all potential loyal wingmen.
i don't think the f22 was a blunder. the war it was meant to fight in nevet happened. maybe part of it's job was just existing to discourage that war from happening. but we're super excited about ghostbat and aukus over here. great ti be working with you guys!
I wonder how much we can piss off the French by cancelling their submarine and helicopter deals before they switch sides
Can you do the Russian Air Force next
By 2040 the Russian Air Force will be largely the same. Their sixth generation fighter projects hare highly unlikely to finish by 2050 and by then it would be completely outdated and bested by American, European Union, and Chinese aircraft.
@@_.12Midnight there is already 6th gen underdevelopment in Russia the su 57 took 20 years max to develop so 6th gen in 20years is plausible and there’s aircraft like the su-75 under development as well
My brother worked for NavAir now Lockheed Martin yeah hes developing the Missile Payloads for most of these new War Machines.
3:50 this is impossible, the B-52 is the USAs stress ball, when we need to upgrade something we have BUFF
WE BOUTTA ENTER STRANGEREAL WITH THIS ONE!!!! 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💥💥💥💥💥
I have a question and excuse me if someone answered this. But for new vtol replacing the apache in this video, has anyone designed one with jets instead of propeller blades at the ends ? Is it because of fuel consumption or technology??
Mostly fuel consumption, and turbo fans tend to be more fragile for the weight than turbo props so materials technology and stored energy density has to advance quite a bit.
That deep black compartmentalised ET back engineered skunk works stuff
The B52 will still be around
Radar works on the principle of the reflecting waves to point he target.
Anti-stealth radar works on the principle of an object absorbing the waves.
So it can point to the target.
And the two can work in tandem.
So it's a wee bit biased to say she is invisible
We will be flying F-35's, a few dozen NGAD/MQ-25, about a hundred upgraded F-15/16, B-21, B-52, C-17, C-130, and perhaps a small number of F-22's.
I believe that and drone fighter plane and TR3B has already been built and in in the process of getting approval for air worthiness. It seems like the movie STEALTH which was released in 2005 has become reality
It seems like airlifters could replace the B-52 in all but the nuclear roll
Imagine the breakthrough possibilities in aerodynamics, weight distribution and thrust vectoring once the traditional cockpit with its pesky human limitations on G-force, visibility and survivability is taken out of the equation.
Yep just print and press out new airframes and upload an AI with a few field based forward air support pilots keep the fight going with a swarm. Meatsacks in fighter and attack aircraft cockpits will soon be a thing of the past, like biplanes and battleships.
Some hits and misses in this vid but overall pretty good.
All bets are off after 2030.
By that time, exponential advances due to AI assisted design, materials technology and manufacturing will likely render everything here obsolete.
It'll be a bunch of aeroplanes, I reckon.
So cool
7:03 what movie was this scene from?
Top Gun Maverick
Technology marches on.
What? No 3000 mph, missile-shaped aircraft with ramjets?
Haha I pissed myself, the raider replacing the B2 and B1 and then THEN hopefully the B52
AMAZINGNES!!!
They really should have gone with the Sikorsky Defiant X.
there gonna look like ufo's eventually
It boggles my mind how them "Mat Sallehs" make planes that look like the stuff you'd see in movies, games or books.
2040? B52 and F15 :D
Suggestion Chrysler TV-8 tank pls 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
yeah.... future... 40 years ago we were told about flying cars in 2000, two years ago we were thought cleaning our hands...
Imagine ifvwe actually had a near peer (like an iranian empire) then it's quite possible aircraft based on older airframes would be more efficient.
"..280 knots/hour" is like saying 280 nautical miles per hour per hour.
at this pace I am predicting that in 2040 , the us Air Force will be composed of pigeons and air balloons.....
Ace Combat got a new DLC?
man i cant wait how dogfightes in 2040 with 6th generation jets is gone look like
Yeah!
What Would The U.S. Air Force Look Like in 2170?
Can you ask RAAF, in the future is it possible to export your MQ 25 Ghost Bat to your northern neighbour?😊😊😊😊
no pilot? so no consequenses for getting it down the fast way... brilliant
U promised us to do a boing 314 plane 2 yrs ago
it goes 280 nautical miles per hour per hour? damn v280 is sick (no rlly what happened here)
I believe the Sikorsky S-97 Raider would be a BETTER choice than the Bell V-280 Valor
The speed of sr 72 darkstar is mach 10 not mach 6... why everyone get this wrong
Damn I was really hoping for a light at the end of the dark tunle for the Comanche helicopter😢. But alas it seems not.
I honestly thought with the disaster of the V22 Osprey the US would be incredibly shy of anything further tiltrotor related. I may be exaggerating the Osprey's lethality to its occupants, but I don't feel like I am by much, I seem to remember it killing lots of people, especially during its testing phases.
By 2040 we should have over 2k f35 in our arsenal
4:04 recent diplomatic and economic partnerships between India and US has also resulted in US proposing B 21 Raiders to India :)
Anti-magnetic incoherence technology is mind-blowing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Digitalized fighters will be more susceptible to hacks
I firmly believe the higher-ups in the Pentagon NEED TO BE REPLACED. Their overspending and lack if insight is costing the taxpayers far too much. I also believe that the B-1B Lancer is the most cost-effective platform for the money, regardless of maintenance costs. It can carry an enormous payload, fly under the radar, and fly at supersonic speeds, which could potentially scare off the enemy without the use of weapons.
And also to look to the past of the most successful aircrafts of the jet age.
One of the most secretive planes is the tr3b and tr3e.
Will there even been a US air force in the future?
I think there will be, just with a lot less meatsacks in fighters and attack aircraft, and stealth bombers and drone "motherships" will probably involve some kind of system to confuse optic based AI.
At that time, Russia is still hundreds of Su-57 & Su-75
Where’s the 7th Gen Alien back engineered stuff
Wait the SR-72 is real?
Problem worth the v280 replacing the black hawk is that while the black hawk isn’t the stealthiest it is smaller and harder to spot and probably quieter, which is what makes it popular, the V280 seems to be a lot bigger and double engines means found sound unless they find a very quiet engine
I believe the Sikorsky S-97 Raider would be a BETTER choice than the Bell V-280 Valor.
@@SagatBordyev yup single engine probably quieter
@@sop1918wow, it must be hard to be smarter than literally everyone else, I wonder why they didn’t ask you for your opinion? It couldn’t be because it’s an uninformed one could it? After all, it’s not like the black hawk already has two engines, right? Wait, shit, it does
@@SagatBordyevt the s-97 and v280 weren’t in competition with each other, they were submitted to different programs dipshit
@@jb76489 I’m talking about rotor blades sorry, and this is a discussion, chill man also I never said I was smarter so don’t put words in my mouth