Additional information: - If a boxer becomes champion or interim champion they are removed from the rankings of all other organisations, unless unified. - If boxers don't pay their fees they are removed from the rankings of that organisation. - If a champion leaves the division or retires, the interim champion is elevated to full champion.
@@lrockyfan5106 nope, the WBO should have always been a real belt. the WBO and IBO actually enforce their rules and contractual obligations for champions, unlike the WBC and even IBF.
No problem with 4 belts. If you follow the sport it's pretty easy to understand but when they started bringing in interim belts and silver belts and international belts etc it's just too much
The WBC Interim Belt doesnt necessarily mean you are fighting for the “actual” belt, cause Benavidez was mandatory for 2 years and didn’t fight Canelo.
I would rather only have to remember one champ per weight class instead of 70+ across all classes. Imagine if the NBA or NFL had an MVP for each division and conference, no one would care about that accomplishment anymore
I've got the lot including the international version of the IBF, regular and super in the WBA, Ibo, wbo super, ring for canelo and fury version. But the very best I've got is the Lonsdale belt by a mile. It's a beauty.
I think there should be continental, interim and world champion. With continental champs having that belt as a ability to challenge interims or atleast get up in the ranks and seen in the scene. Then fighters should be ranked on all promotions and not being removed after having a belt in another one. This whole extra belt stuff should all be removed
4 belts is fine and really sells the idea of Undisputed Champion While winning a single MMA title makes you "uNdiSputed" UFC, Bellator, Strikeforce, & One FC could come together to actually make a true Undisputed MMA Champion
NOPE. respect the IBO belt, champions like Anthony Cacace have made a living off of defending and unifying that belt with others in the division. the IBO is underrated- they also use the most objective and unbiased ranking system in boxing because it's done by computers.
@@OfficialAdmin …how? Dalton Smith, Hamzah Sheeraz, need i say more? the UK is producing world-level talent more consistently because they are being matched up well.
why not just have one belt for a champion of a weight class at each weight class. the best would have to fight the best to become a champion. ain’t that one of the biggest problems in boxing? champs being can crushers instead of fighting the best other fighters in the divisions
@@Dabobert true,and if there's just one champ the sport would be more competitive,who needs to be the wbc champ when the wba champ is weaker and easier to beat?
1 belt would be bad for the sport. think about all of the people who are in contender status in only one of the 5 sanctioning bodies. how would you handle that vs. people ranked in all 5?
Boxing should go back to 1 title…. But they won’t because of money. It answers a lot of questions. Why? Money. The answer to “why are their so many?” Is simple; sanctioning fee charged by the organisation who owns the title. The IBO…. Not worth wiping your butt with compared to the other 4. “Super” title is a polite way of saying “unified title holder” and now we can add another and charge 2 sanctioning fees. The WBO is no better, they’re put out “international championship” titles which are worth…. Nothing Canelo gets a new weird belt from the WBC because he is Mexican and so is the WBC.
I hate the UFC’s belt model. It somehow is ends up more corrupt than the 4 belt model. That said, it seems the Saudis will save us from this nightmare.
@@Dabobertno it doesn't. take heavyweight, for example. Jon Jones is the HW Champion, while Tom Aspinall is the Interim Champion. Jones refuses to unify- so Aspinall is forced to defend the Interim belt against competition Jones should be defending against instead.
@@mikebipping6166 Bro, that is a exception to the rule. Overall if you actually look at the one belt system it really is the best. Especially because when you only have one belt everybody has the same goal and so the best has to fight the best and it is really hard to duck opponents even though there are exceptions. So yeah sometimes even the 1 belt model doesn't work that well but compare that to the cesspool of boxing titles and the ducking of boxing champions i would MUCH rather take the one belt system.
The Covid-19 Belt 🤣
Truly a belt of all time
I need one now🤣😂
they gon make a diddy belt next
4 belts is fine, everything else is overboard.
Just like your mother
@@STANKORachevdayum
Personally I think 4 is overboard, 1 makes sense to me
@@shanewilliams9076maybe if it weren't corrupt. You're advocating for a monoply essentially suggesting a single sanctioning body be in charge
if uncle propa is right then we have a nice change on our hands, with turki al sheikh merging all the promotions into one mega promotion
I think they should keep at least three of the belts, just because they look nice lol.
@@ellie3910 it's also just kinda cool to see a undisputed champ hold more than one belt. gives aura fr
This video has made me even more confused 😂😂😂 not your fault it’s a great detailed video there’s just too many belts 😭
Ong
Additional information:
- If a boxer becomes champion or interim champion they are removed from the rankings of all other organisations, unless unified.
- If boxers don't pay their fees they are removed from the rankings of that organisation.
- If a champion leaves the division or retires, the interim champion is elevated to full champion.
Nice info from your mother
OfficeHancho got a great video on the belts if you need another vid
Yeah his vids are good. He deserves more views
the music🎷
i wish there are just the normal 4 belts bro.
That would be great but they love money too much
@@Dabobert yeah,or probably just one belt so the game became more fair and competitive.
I wish there were 3. The WBO should have never become a legit title.
I wish there was just one belt bro. All top contenders would be forced to face each other, something that seldom happens now
@@lrockyfan5106 nope, the WBO should have always been a real belt. the WBO and IBO actually enforce their rules and contractual obligations for champions, unlike the WBC and even IBF.
WBC = World Belt Council
Nahh the algorithm is crazyyy. I watched tj’s vids yesterday and today bro is in my feed
Yeah that’s how algorithms work lil bro
That Covid belt was so ridiculous that it has to be a troll I feel like
Good job on the video. I’m always explaining this to friends that don’t understand the belts and you did a good job explaining it/
No problem with 4 belts. If you follow the sport it's pretty easy to understand but when they started bringing in interim belts and silver belts and international belts etc it's just too much
The WBC Interim Belt doesnt necessarily mean you are fighting for the “actual” belt, cause Benavidez was mandatory for 2 years and didn’t fight Canelo.
That's because you have to activate it. Which he didn't.
I would rather only have to remember one champ per weight class instead of 70+ across all classes.
Imagine if the NBA or NFL had an MVP for each division and conference, no one would care about that accomplishment anymore
I've got the lot including the international version of the IBF, regular and super in the WBA, Ibo, wbo super, ring for canelo and fury version. But the very best I've got is the Lonsdale belt by a mile. It's a beauty.
RAHHHHHHHHHHH I LOVE BELTS!!!!!!!!!!
Andy Ruiz "snickers 🍫" belt is my fav 😎
Quite good video, thx for it
The DBC has come to clean it all up.
I would like to see the ibo more
The peoples champ belt is one of the latest ones
Boxing is just way too corrupt to take seriously anymore. That being said, i’m very glad usyk took the belts away from fury.
I think there should be continental, interim and world champion. With continental champs having that belt as a ability to challenge interims or atleast get up in the ranks and seen in the scene. Then fighters should be ranked on all promotions and not being removed after having a belt in another one. This whole extra belt stuff should all be removed
Too many titles, too complicated. It’s why iwalked away from boxing 30 years ago…
4 belts is fine and really sells the idea of Undisputed Champion
While winning a single MMA title makes you "uNdiSputed"
UFC, Bellator, Strikeforce, & One FC could come together to actually make a true Undisputed MMA Champion
What about the youth world champion belts?
I thought the ring magazine belt was the lineal championship belt
NOPE. respect the IBO belt, champions like Anthony Cacace have made a living off of defending and unifying that belt with others in the division. the IBO is underrated- they also use the most objective and unbiased ranking system in boxing because it's done by computers.
no one cares if some britbum defends that belt
@@OfficialAdmin the “britbum” literally knocked out one of the best the West had to offer in Cordina. casuals like you are just pure comedy😆
@@mikebipping6166 Cordina is another britbum LMAO british boxing is a joke
@@OfficialAdmin …how? Dalton Smith, Hamzah Sheeraz, need i say more? the UK is producing world-level talent more consistently because they are being matched up well.
@@mikebipping6166 all bums
You forgot about the *IBF*
if they defended it? they get another one?
The more belts there are the less valuable they become. Compared to the UFC this is just a big joke
David Haney…idk about that
It’s all about money!!!!! If you call a guy a world champ you can make more money out of him!!
i still don’t understand.. but thanks 😅
What do you still not understand?
theres really only 4 real belts, any other title is not real the only additional title thats recognized is the ring magizine belt
@@deathmatchhh
j
🥊🥊🥊🥊🥊🥊🥊🥊🥊🥊
Imagine all the absurd belts canelo has
I feel like there should be only one belt maybe two per division not 4
why not just have one belt for a champion of a weight class at each weight class. the best would have to fight the best to become a champion. ain’t that one of the biggest problems in boxing? champs being can crushers instead of fighting the best other fighters in the divisions
I hope Turkih is goin to buy all sanctioning bodies and make 1 champ per division.
That would be great and would definitely help the sport a lot but I hope fighters pay wouldn't go down
turki alalshikh the savior of boxing 🙏🙏
@@Dabobert true,and if there's just one champ the sport would be more competitive,who needs to be the wbc champ when the wba champ is weaker and easier to beat?
1 belt would be bad for the sport. think about all of the people who are in contender status in only one of the 5 sanctioning bodies. how would you handle that vs. people ranked in all 5?
@@mikebipping6166 elimination bout prob to be the no.1 contender?
Don’t forget all the Mickey mouse commenwealth/european/silver belts 🤣
Think there should be national title and world titles that’s it no super titles no diamond or silver none of that bullshit
Boxing should go back to 1 title…. But they won’t because of money. It answers a lot of questions. Why? Money.
The answer to “why are their so many?” Is simple; sanctioning fee charged by the organisation who owns the title.
The IBO…. Not worth wiping your butt with compared to the other 4.
“Super” title is a polite way of saying “unified title holder” and now we can add another and charge 2 sanctioning fees. The WBO is no better, they’re put out “international championship” titles which are worth…. Nothing
Canelo gets a new weird belt from the WBC because he is Mexican and so is the WBC.
Ufc belt>
I hate the UFC’s belt model. It somehow is ends up more corrupt than the 4 belt model.
That said, it seems the Saudis will save us from this nightmare.
Nah I like the one belt per divison it makes the best fight the best
@@Dabobertno it doesn't. take heavyweight, for example. Jon Jones is the HW Champion, while Tom Aspinall is the Interim Champion. Jones refuses to unify- so Aspinall is forced to defend the Interim belt against competition Jones should be defending against instead.
@@mikebipping6166 Bro, that is a exception to the rule. Overall if you actually look at the one belt system it really is the best. Especially because when you only have one belt everybody has the same goal and so the best has to fight the best and it is really hard to duck opponents even though there are exceptions. So yeah sometimes even the 1 belt model doesn't work that well but compare that to the cesspool of boxing titles and the ducking of boxing champions i would MUCH rather take the one belt system.
Just admit it boxing belt don't meant shit
No no