Your Daily Equation | Live Q&A with Brian Greene

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
  • Live Q&A with Brian Greene - #YourDailyEquation: Join a live session with Brian Greene, 3 PM EDT. Relativity, quantum, the universe -- ask him anything that's on your mind.
    We’d love to see & hear your questions for future Q&As with Brian Greene. Send us a video (less than 20 seconds please!) of yourself asking your question to: questions@worldsciencefestival.com
    Monday - Friday at 3pm EDT, Brian will offer brief and breezy discussions of pivotal equations. Even if your math is a bit rusty, tune in for accessible and exciting stories of nature and numbers that will allow you to see the universe in a new way.
    The World Science Festival (WSF) is an innovative multi-media organization that produces original live and digital content straddling the arenas of science, technology, the arts, media, performance and education. With the goal of radically transforming public perceptions of science, WSF creates world-class programming, both live on stage and televised, featuring inspired collaborations, outstanding talent and novel production techniques that bring scientific discovery, insight and perspective to a broad general audience.
    Visit www.worldsciencefestival.com to learn more.
    Follow the World Science Festival on Twitter: / worldscifest
    Like the World Science Festival on Facebook: / worldsciencefestival
    Follow the World Science Festival on Instagram: / worldscifest
    Subscribe to our channel: / worldsciencefestival
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 89

  • @fultzjap
    @fultzjap 4 роки тому +20

    Getting a Q&A here was the coolest thing that's happened to me in a long time. I'm so grateful that leaders like you are taking the time to stream edutainment during lockdown!

  • @madhavsingh8431
    @madhavsingh8431 4 роки тому +10

    Briane green ... We love you!!!!!

  • @rickmorrisrigar
    @rickmorrisrigar 4 роки тому +8

    Thank You for doing this Professor Greene !!

  • @belgianvanbeethoven
    @belgianvanbeethoven 4 роки тому +3

    This description of life as a dance of entropy is truly a wonderful way to think about it. That's why I love physics, how it merges the rational thinking of maths with the philosophical questions of why things are the way they are and what our place in this vast universe is.

    • @rlsfrny
      @rlsfrny 4 роки тому +2

      @Giuseppe Bongiovanni Those who speak in conundrums are bound to trip over their own shoelaces.

  • @rhmcvay
    @rhmcvay 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you Brian for your thoughtful presentation during a time of distress for our community on Earth.

  • @AP-cs4rf
    @AP-cs4rf 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much for your great videos! Your ability to explain pretty complex topics in physics and mathematics so clear is amazing.

  • @gedlangosz1127
    @gedlangosz1127 4 роки тому

    Professor Greene - thank you ever so much for these videos. I love them!

  • @Dr10Jeeps
    @Dr10Jeeps 4 роки тому +1

    Fascinating exposition of various topics. Thank you.

  • @darshakramani7196
    @darshakramani7196 4 роки тому +1

    astounding conversation, really good explanation to the ideas, thanks for doing this.

  • @drquantum439
    @drquantum439 4 роки тому

    Thank you sir for sharing your time and knowledge 🙏

  • @mungbean60
    @mungbean60 4 роки тому

    Beautiful ending, thank you for your inspiring words.

  • @samansadri4016
    @samansadri4016 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much Professor Brian Greene. Would you please talk about chaos theory?

  • @TheMorpheuuus
    @TheMorpheuuus 4 роки тому

    Super Q&A session Brian! Thanks again from Algeria 👍

  • @vernongrant3596
    @vernongrant3596 4 роки тому

    Thanks for your question Jiminy Cricket. The whole block universe thing always gets to me. The fact that my whole life has always existed and always will exist is beyond comprehension. I asked Professor Sean Carroll if the meal I just had down by the riverside prior to meeting him still existed . He replied that it doesn't "still" exist it just exists.

  • @dandelion6692
    @dandelion6692 4 роки тому

    thanks for sharing dr b 🍏

  • @chanpol321
    @chanpol321 4 роки тому

    Thanks!

  • @GolanFacio
    @GolanFacio 4 роки тому +1

    I really love to listen about the Maxwell equations compared with general relativity

  • @rickcygnusx1
    @rickcygnusx1 4 роки тому

    I think I'm getting addicted to this series! Here's a suggestion for a future video: the Virial theorem. Lately I've been reading a book on cosmology, and it talks about astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky noticing the speeds of individual galaxies in a galaxy cluster being too fast for them to stay bound to the cluster, which I believe was the first evidence for the existence of dark matter. The book points out he used the Virial theorem on his analysis, but unfortunately doesn't really get too much into detail on how he used it.

  • @fathia3547
    @fathia3547 4 роки тому +1

    Dr. Brian ... could you show the action of Strng Theory in an Episode :)
    I saw many explanations of yours to the theory, but never an Equation describing the theory ...

  • @mfaturova
    @mfaturova 4 роки тому

    In one of your quotation of the day episode you explained the math behind quantum entanglement. But I did not get what causes this behaviour? Do we know where is the phenomenon is coming from? Thank you so much for doing this!

  • @cirdiam1800
    @cirdiam1800 4 роки тому

    Did your motivation of schrodingers wave equation or debroglie’s equation assume things moving at speed of light?

  • @raniagian8167
    @raniagian8167 4 роки тому +1

    Ok,this is dope

  • @shukivardi6393
    @shukivardi6393 Рік тому

    Brian you have encouraged me to ask you if only one question.
    My name is Shuki Vardi, 67 years old from Israel with no formal education or university education. So my level of knowledge and understanding of the subjects in question is relatively low.
    the question:
    "Is there a connection between the Jewish rule void at 60 and the assertion that the speed of light is constant?"

    • @shukivardi6393
      @shukivardi6393 Рік тому

      As an answer I would like to say thanks a lot for letting me to listen and watch you in you tube it's really chear me up

  • @annagorska1229
    @annagorska1229 4 роки тому

    Please, say something more about the equations of thermodynamics and how it is possible that living organisms exist.

  • @johnesposito5508
    @johnesposito5508 4 роки тому

    Brian can you please explain the work of Dr J Gates and Supersymmetry ? Thanks from Montclair NJ 🎆

  • @mowood659
    @mowood659 4 роки тому

    please please please talk about your first impressions of Wolfram's new framework

  • @maxcohengeniuus
    @maxcohengeniuus 4 роки тому

    Prof Green the best physics

  • @keramatebrahimi943
    @keramatebrahimi943 4 роки тому

    Are we made in such a way to know everything?

  • @roboto204
    @roboto204 4 роки тому

    Couldn't you use entanglement to send simple on/off signals for binary- essentially disregard up/down just use the "determined spin" as the 1 and the "uncertain" spin as 0

  • @muhammadshuraim9007
    @muhammadshuraim9007 4 роки тому

    Sir Brian Greene!! Can you tell us that Is there any equation which told that star having how much mass can be directly converted to black hole 🕳 when it dies ? (mean some stars converts to black hole and some just explode.. How we can say stars future of black hole by just seeking its mass) ?
    Hope you will answer this question in coming episode!!!🤔

  • @auxbonnieux
    @auxbonnieux 4 роки тому

    Snowy Buffalo, NY

  • @inj1979
    @inj1979 4 роки тому +1

    Professor can an Asteroid burn without oxygen, but only with the high temperature or the heat?

  • @woodstockjon420
    @woodstockjon420 4 роки тому

    Woodstock New York ✌🏼

  • @kagannasuhbeyoglu
    @kagannasuhbeyoglu 4 роки тому

    Dear Prof.Brian Green what do you think about the fate of string theory? Will it be proven in the future or will it lose its claim?

  • @mulkrajsingh834
    @mulkrajsingh834 4 роки тому

    Could you please speak on bose-enistien condensation.

  • @franciscorosales7447
    @franciscorosales7447 Рік тому

    Francisco, the great smoky mountains: is gravity affected by time dilation?

  • @chitranshagarwal8502
    @chitranshagarwal8502 4 роки тому

    Sir is time physicicaly there or it is a state of mind

  • @danexall
    @danexall 4 роки тому

    @Brian Greene: As I understand an anti-electron mathematically is exactly the same as an electron travelling for forward through time except travels backwards - is this correct? If so, given the recent discovery of a 'parallel universe' (by NASA if not mistaken) where time goes in the opposite direction, would it not make sense that there was no 'dark matter' at the beginning, yet it will overwhelm the universe in the end, this supporting the cyclical big bang / singularity / repeat theory? Please correct me if I have anti- and negative-charge electrons mixed up and explain what difference this would make to this hypothesis. Many thanks. Dan.

  • @johnpost7557
    @johnpost7557 4 роки тому

    Can you tell somthing about Affine spaces?

  • @bikeomatic8005
    @bikeomatic8005 4 роки тому

    Professor Greene, here is my question regarding big bang. I heard two descriptions recently. So first one claims that everything we have in the universe today originated from a marble size of mater or energy (not sure what correct description is). The second version claims that big bang did not happen from this small marble like object but that the entirety of the universe was extremely dense and hot. So do we know which version is more likely true and in case of the second version what was the size of the universe in its dense and hot state and has it expanded since then or just cooled down and matter created all the galaxies that spread around throughout entire space? For the exact explanation of the state of the entire universe at the big bang I would suggest viewing the Royal Institute's YT channel lecture by Dan Hopper "What happened at the begining of time" around 10:20. Thank you.

    • @joshuakostynuik
      @joshuakostynuik 4 роки тому +1

      Polarization of background radiation hot spots proves the expansion of the universe. We can see this with telescopes and calculate the results.

  • @williamwalkup988
    @williamwalkup988 4 роки тому

    North Carolina

  • @FouzSiddiqui
    @FouzSiddiqui 4 роки тому

    Can someone please suggest me a course for mathematics to have ease in understanding the mathematics of physics? To start with...

  • @jamesward522
    @jamesward522 2 роки тому +1

    how do i participate in your live q&a?

  • @marcelolodeiro
    @marcelolodeiro Рік тому

    Hiiii from Brasil

  • @woody7652
    @woody7652 4 роки тому +3

    Why didn't anyone tell me Brain Greene was LIVE?

  • @dougg1075
    @dougg1075 4 роки тому +2

    How can you believe in multiple universes with multiple “ you” and say there cannot be a creator or cosmic consciousness ( god) ?

  • @esakoivuniemi
    @esakoivuniemi 4 роки тому +3

    Brian, thanks a lot for doing this.
    Someone asked (at 34:00 or so): "Are equations invented or discovered?"
    Brian's answer was essentially: "I don't know."
    I think I can come up with a better answer :b.
    Let's define the terms first:
    An equation is a *claim* that a certain relationship exists between things that are represented by symbols in the equation.
    The Oxford English Dictionary defines invention as: "to design and/or create something that has never been made before"
    Discovery on the other hand means: "to find information, a place, or an object, especially for the first time:" according the same dictionary.
    So, inventing is about creating something new and discovering is about finding something that already exists.
    Now, let's use the equation e=mc2 as an example. If you think Einstein invented, i.e. created it out of thin air, that would mean that energy, mass and the speed of light were not related the way his equation says before the year 1905. That is obviously nonsense. The relations between the these things certainly existed before Einstein *discovered* them and wrote down the symbolic representation of those relationships - namely the equation e=mc2.
    On the other hand, I can write down an equation e=pm3. That equation is obviously incorrect. Those relationships do not exist in the physical reality nor in any axiomatic system I am aware of. That means I couldn't possibly discover it, since its impossible to discover something that does not exist in the first place. So the equation has to be my invention.
    Thus the bottom line, IMHO, is:
    Correct equations are always discovered, incorrect equations are always invented. Therefore the right answer to the original question "Are equations invented or discovered?" is: Yes, they are.

    • @RicardoMarlowFlamenco
      @RicardoMarlowFlamenco 4 роки тому

      Esa Koivuniemi math is a tool. There needs to be an invented concept then the equation can be discovered. For example prime number is a concept, human invention, the infinite series of them is the discovery about them. Math is both invented and discovered in this sense. Physics only needs special cases of math and physical laws, applied to disposable models subject to change. Abstract math need not be discovering anything until there is first the invented concept.

    • @esakoivuniemi
      @esakoivuniemi 4 роки тому

      @@RicardoMarlowFlamenco Well, my comment was a bit in the tongue in cheek department, because the view I presented is way too simplistic, to be frank.
      That being said, I am symphatetic to your view of math as a tool and you're absolutely right IMO, in saying a discovery requires a concept for the thing(s) discoverd as a prerequisite.
      However, the question: "are concepts inventions" is a whole another matter. We don't know all the gory details of how our brains form new concepts (as yet, that is). From what I've gathered about it, it may well be that it is in large parts based on pattern recognition (i.e discovering new patterns) and its not clear at all where the "invention" part fits in.
      But yeah, this is an interesting topic.

  • @michaelwhalan9783
    @michaelwhalan9783 4 роки тому

    Is there an equation to describe a spinning object or galaxy moving from a high energy to a low energy state by the flattening of the spin or disk formation?

  • @djcrazy.605
    @djcrazy.605 4 роки тому +1

    Me Avik from India.....where the fabtic of Cosmos is laid?

  • @lhoyt03
    @lhoyt03 4 роки тому +1

    I would like to hear a discussion about the relationship between math equations and reality. I can not rap my head around the relationship. I do not doubt theories but do not understand how you get from numbers to reality. Wouldn’t you say it is the other way around. Larry, Turlock, ca

    • @lhoyt03
      @lhoyt03 4 роки тому

      Wrap

    • @joshuakostynuik
      @joshuakostynuik 4 роки тому +1

      Easy. Only two steps. Step one is start with postulates/axioms (assumptions or rules you make up) which is how you build a theory mathematically consistent with itself. Step two, is use your theory to predict something in the real world and then test that prediction. At the end, you know if your math reflects the real world or not. That’s all of science in a nutshell.

  • @GolanFacio
    @GolanFacio 4 роки тому

    Why don't you evolved electromagnetism to include gravity like Einstein tried so long. This is why I ask more about Maxwell equations and general relativity. I always felt that something deep was connecting them both

  • @drex23100
    @drex23100 2 роки тому

    Every mathematical relationship is both invented and discovered. The pattern is discovered, the equation which describes the pattern is the invented or interpreted component.

  • @sherylj1386
    @sherylj1386 4 роки тому

    There is something I believe is faster than the speed of light and that would be consciousness. Just a thought.

  • @aceedal
    @aceedal 4 роки тому

    Alrewas England

  • @shukivardi6393
    @shukivardi6393 Рік тому +1

    Is there any connection between Telepathy and quantum mechanics?

    • @shukivardi6393
      @shukivardi6393 Рік тому

      Is that quastion challenge you?

    • @alexanderabrashev1366
      @alexanderabrashev1366 Рік тому +1

      No, because telepathy doesn't exist.

    • @shukivardi6393
      @shukivardi6393 Рік тому

      @@alexanderabrashev1366 R you kiding me my life is 100℅ telepathy

    • @shukivardi6393
      @shukivardi6393 Рік тому

      @@alexanderabrashev1366 May be for you and that good respond to my question although it's not necessary fits to everybody. R u agree? Or denies

  • @localtitans4166
    @localtitans4166 4 роки тому

    Is existence possible without mass or energy

  • @yaserthe1
    @yaserthe1 4 роки тому

    Brian, are u in a forest cabin?

  • @jonatanvignatti4730
    @jonatanvignatti4730 4 роки тому

    Chile

  • @williamwalkup988
    @williamwalkup988 4 роки тому

    Knowing man has only set foot on our own moon and the distant of other stars can we only dream of visiting other stars and planets.

  • @PauloRenatoRodriguesprr
    @PauloRenatoRodriguesprr 4 роки тому

    Is there any chance of discovering the nature of dark matter in the next years?

  • @vaibhavkumar3106
    @vaibhavkumar3106 4 роки тому +1

    brother dark matter and dark energy.....are string which are vibrating and destrustive interference showing they are not there but they are their....all the time .....;;:''+

  • @singh92wassan
    @singh92wassan 4 роки тому

    Don’t get it what he is talking about 🧐

  • @igotzelda
    @igotzelda 4 роки тому

    Can whoever gave thumbs down please comment why? Curious to hear what's wrong with these videos :/

  • @ashafaghi
    @ashafaghi 4 роки тому

    Would a human clone (if it is made) have consciousness?

    • @bjorntorlarsson
      @bjorntorlarsson 4 роки тому

      The answer is this equation: 42=7*6. (According to Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy, which is a good reading when you are being abducting from an Earth to be annihilated as part of some interstellar highway construction project.)

    • @rlsfrny
      @rlsfrny 4 роки тому

      Of course. A clone is just a replication of the same DNA. It is not an android or a machine. A human clone would be as human as you or I. Consider the sheep clone Dolly. That was a "normal" sheep, but it did not result from sexual reproduction.

  • @keithburns3669
    @keithburns3669 4 роки тому

    Thank you professor. It occurs to me that God, if he exist, wrote the laws of physics. He would be, by definition, the Creator. There is no way to prove His existence by testing or observing His creation. Physics is what we can observe. Metaphysics is that which goes beyond what we can observe, transcending the limits of our observations. Physics is the what, Metaphysics is the what for... the why. At the end of Physics, Metaphysics. At the end of Metaphysics, Physics. They chase each other around, always leaving more to be observed or discovered. Ultimately, you can only know God by Faith, there is no Proof of His existence. You must trust in Him and choose life, choose Love. Choose belief in that which you cannot prove, which is Faith. Physics and Metaphysics walk hand in hand in life, just as Faith and Science. Faith in God. Belief in Science. Live long and prosper. Love thy neighbor as thy self. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Treat other people the way that you would want to be treated. Much love to you. May God bless you and keep you. Please enjoy your day, and continue to help us see further into the Nature of our Universe.

    • @harshildeora1001
      @harshildeora1001 4 роки тому

      Dude I'm not being rude here, but physics and metaphysics have no relation with each other. Physics describes motion and also explains why that motion happens(through forces that is). All the theories of physics have accurately described reality without the need of a creator. The reason why the laws of physics are the way they are is due to the multiverse, not because some God created them. There is no way any mystical being/entity could create the weirdness and probabilities associated with quantum mechanics. We also have the concept of irrational numbers like pi and e. These guys are unending. And when I mean unending I mean they have uncountable number of terms which are completely random. Yet we associate these numbers in our daily lives(at least in the lives of physicists and mathematicians). How could any being think/create such things.

  • @mikebailey519
    @mikebailey519 4 роки тому

    Crawling on the planet’s face. Some insects call the human race. Lost in time, lost in space and meaning.

  • @Wardads1
    @Wardads1 4 роки тому

    What does the rise of flat earthers and other anti science nonsense bode for science and scientists one wonders ..

    • @joshuakostynuik
      @joshuakostynuik 4 роки тому +3

      History is full of fools, pay them no mind. Focus on the contributions you can make with the time you have.

  • @ybc8495
    @ybc8495 3 роки тому

    human has no hope! look at this only get 15K view; while a video game can get 150K view in just 1 day.