You might be right there. They also said, they have a ten year plan. We are in year seven... i would not be surprised, if we see Elite Dangerous being dropped in three years for a completely new full price game in the franchise.
While it doesn't mean much, there technically were comets in the game in the original ED alpha. Not sure if they were ever properly modeled, but the system Pareco has 6 stations orbiting where one of these comets would be. There's still an instance in the system that is labeled Pareco Comet 2. forums.frontier.co.uk/threads/comets-are-already-present-in-the-stellar-forge-you-can-drop-into-normal-space-close-to-them.350586/
@@wbhokie13 They abandon comets because they looked to much liked ships in supercruise. with some of the particle affects they can do now, they can really do comets justice, will they, is a different question.
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise I'm sorry did you say realistic? Black holes in Elite dangerous are the biggest turn off in the game, they look like little dusts on space instead of an actual complete black hole. You also can literally fly through them as if it is nothing, you call that realistic? Also they do have Sagittarius A in the game which is a supermassive black hole and it should have the accretion disk around it, but it dosen't. If there's one thing that Elite dangerous don't have is realistic black holes.
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise Again where did you get that black holes in Elite Dangerous are like black holes in real life, basically everything about them in the game is wrong.
I don’t remember where it is, but there was a black hole that was no more than like 1km big or something that would let me get within 30km of it, which was wild because I’d just end up inside the darkness.
Body exclusion zone annoys me.at least give us the choice to fly into the horizon zone and spaghetti ourselves of we want to instead of the fence around it !!
The only thing that can escape the event horizon is the frame shift drive and the escape pod doesn't have on of those so that wouldn't make sense in the lore
@@ChildOfTheWilderness thats insanely stupid, you want to play a space game, it should include DANGEROUS blackholes. Not silly representations of a blackhole that's just looking cute. BORING....
@Hawker75 While that's a fair point, we know for a fact that they can't look like how they do in Elite, because of the photon sphere that would prevent any light from emanating near the center of the event horizon.
You guys all know theres a trio of black holes close to the bubble yeah? I always see you guys going to sag A and that's a long trip theres a star system about 500 ly away from the bubble that holds three black holes and a blue white star
Yup, went there myself recently. Pissed my pants when i realized there was a black hole right beside me and i couldnt see it because the way they render is pretty bad if they're close to a star. Had a panic attack when i realized how close it was when i looked at the navifation pannel.
Real black holes wouldn't really pull you in either. Not anything other than a supermassive black hole, and even then the effect is EXTREMELY slow. Black holes don't SUCK at all, they're just really massive.
@@devoutrelic1228 the exclusion zone is like 30 KM from the black hole, they will pull you in... the effect is not extremely slow, it's actually the opposite. it will take you more time to fall into a supermassive black hole than a usual one, you would even most likely die before entering the event horizon on a small black hole but on a supermassive one you can stay alive in there for an hour or 2
I wish they'd make it look a bit cool like you could actually see the thing or something of that sort, I know it'd be less realistic but hey we cruising trough space at multiple times the speed of light, who cares lol
6years and still worse than the openGL website black hole simulator.... But at least they get rid of those ridiculous white powder so it's a indeed upgrade, unlike some other stuff that can be said as downgrade...
Travel through the Black Hole and come out in our present time 2022! Lmao it would be such a funny experience to than travel to the SOL system and than enter earth's orbit especially if it was over a major USA city only to soon have fighter jets dispatched after NORAD picks up your ship swarming around your Spacecraft ordering you to land or be shot down! :O :O :D :D After being forced to land than your pilot can get out of the spacecraft only to be taken away by government agents at that point you can decide whether to make a run for it or to travel with them and attempt to negotiate with 21st Century government agents that think you are an extraterrestrial! ;) :D :D
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise Mass Effect 2 was released in 2010 and the concept was way before that. Interstellar was released in 2014. I'm sure Mass Effect thought of their design first off. I know for Interstellar they talked about having had the computer do something completely different which generated it's concept. It was neat!
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise Interstellar's black Hole Gargantua is very realistic though. Most of black holes in the Milky Way cannot have the disk around it, they're supposed to be black spots with intense lensing going around them. Frontier should only correct how the lensing works, adding the photon sphere and adding the color change to blue when we get too much close on them. Maybe for gameplay purposes, I'd say they should either remove the body exclusion zone or increase the distance from where it activates from the Black Hole. I'd love to see the disk around them, though probably only Sag. A and the Great Annihilator should have it.
@@LoScorpioneRosso1 There are at least a few stellar mass black holes in binary systems that should be close enough to the pair star to accrete matter from them. Those would also have accretion disks. Technically any pair of stars close enough together, particularly if one is smaller and denser, should be accreting from the neighbor star and creating an accretion disk.
@@t3hsilarn I'm not sure about it but that should be the same with some Neutron Stars. There's one close to the bubble that is so close to it's main star that it's model is stuck into it, so it looks like a main star with two eruption. I wonder if it's still like this after the update
The lens effect is pretty good. I still would love to see an accretion disc around black holes... And off topic: comets.
Sadly neither of those things are geared towards FPS players so I'm sure we'll never see that.
You might be right there. They also said, they have a ten year plan. We are in year seven... i would not be surprised, if we see Elite Dangerous being dropped in three years for a completely new full price game in the franchise.
@@pkidawmbt same with grind...but we have that.
While it doesn't mean much, there technically were comets in the game in the original ED alpha. Not sure if they were ever properly modeled, but the system Pareco has 6 stations orbiting where one of these comets would be. There's still an instance in the system that is labeled Pareco Comet 2. forums.frontier.co.uk/threads/comets-are-already-present-in-the-stellar-forge-you-can-drop-into-normal-space-close-to-them.350586/
@@wbhokie13 They abandon comets because they looked to much liked ships in supercruise.
with some of the particle affects they can do now, they can really do comets justice, will they, is a different question.
2:50 Actual beginning.
It's the Wadsworth constant. I think we should all enlighten ourselves with this. Its saved me hours.
I think if you got that close to a black hole and not die the time distortion would be so huge that would come out several years in the future.
The ship being in supercruise cancels that out
@@AAA310he was already out of supercruise when he basicaly touches the event horizon
Looks the same as in Horizons :/
You have a potato pc then
I can't beleive that a space game so realistic like Elite dangerous have such a horrible black hole.
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise I'm sorry did you say realistic? Black holes in Elite dangerous are the biggest turn off in the game, they look like little dusts on space instead of an actual complete black hole. You also can literally fly through them as if it is nothing, you call that realistic?
Also they do have Sagittarius A in the game which is a supermassive black hole and it should have the accretion disk around it, but it dosen't.
If there's one thing that Elite dangerous don't have is realistic black holes.
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise Again where did you get that black holes in Elite Dangerous are like black holes in real life, basically everything about them in the game is wrong.
Realistic? Uh, I'm not sure if you know this or not but... we don't have space ships
@@IJNAzooma Don't waste my time.
@@samuelsouza3054 Then stop wasting mine lol
I don’t remember where it is, but there was a black hole that was no more than like 1km big or something that would let me get within 30km of it, which was wild because I’d just end up inside the darkness.
Was it by the Horsehead nebula?
Body exclusion zone annoys me.at least give us the choice to fly into the horizon zone and spaghetti ourselves of we want to instead of the fence around it !!
The only thing that can escape the event horizon is the frame shift drive and the escape pod doesn't have on of those so that wouldn't make sense in the lore
They used to let people do it, but players complained that Black Holes were too dangerous & they were losing data etc so now they're passive
@@ChildOfTheWilderness thats insanely stupid, you want to play a space game, it should include DANGEROUS blackholes. Not silly representations of a blackhole that's just looking cute. BORING....
All these "graphics updates" and still no visible photon sphere (black hole) in the middle of the black hole.
"event horizon" is the phrase you looking for
@Hawker75 While that's a fair point, we know for a fact that they can't look like how they do in Elite, because of the photon sphere that would prevent any light from emanating near the center of the event horizon.
@Hawker75 we know how they look like because we have taken a photo of one.
@Hawker75 Wrong, it looks just like the black hole in interstellar.
black holes give you a reticle, who knew
There's a reticle in the game settings 👍
24 km!? You can't seriously get that close to a blackhole and not be torn apart by gravity or cooked by x rays, or both!
Bare in mind that's from the centre as well, so they're even closer to the horizon
Imagine if you had 20km+ stick you could poke that big black hole;)
We're going on a trip alright
I don't see any difference.
If it aint dangerous its worthless
You guys all know theres a trio of black holes close to the bubble yeah? I always see you guys going to sag A and that's a long trip theres a star system about 500 ly away from the bubble that holds three black holes and a blue white star
Sag a bigger and cooler though
Yup, went there myself recently. Pissed my pants when i realized there was a black hole right beside me and i couldnt see it because the way they render is pretty bad if they're close to a star. Had a panic attack when i realized how close it was when i looked at the navifation pannel.
still safe, it doesnt pull you in
Real black holes wouldn't really pull you in either. Not anything other than a supermassive black hole, and even then the effect is EXTREMELY slow. Black holes don't SUCK at all, they're just really massive.
@@devoutrelic1228 the exclusion zone is like 30 KM from the black hole, they will pull you in... the effect is not extremely slow, it's actually the opposite. it will take you more time to fall into a supermassive black hole than a usual one, you would even most likely die before entering the event horizon on a small black hole but on a supermassive one you can stay alive in there for an hour or 2
This looks insane.
Why don't you have a percentile on your shield strength? Im pretty sure that's an odyssey thing
It's an old thing I think
I feel like it should be obvious theres a black hole when youre that close its just looks like a soap bubble to me.
LOOK OUT MASTER FRODO!!!
I wish they'd make it look a bit cool like you could actually see the thing or something of that sort, I know it'd be less realistic but hey we cruising trough space at multiple times the speed of light, who cares lol
6years and still worse than the openGL website black hole simulator.... But at least they get rid of those ridiculous white powder so it's a indeed upgrade, unlike some other stuff that can be said as downgrade...
fantastic.
Garbage
4:15 Trippy...
Travel through the Black Hole and come out in our present time 2022! Lmao it would be such a funny experience to than travel to the SOL system and than enter earth's orbit especially if it was over a major USA city only to soon have fighter jets dispatched after NORAD picks up your ship swarming around your Spacecraft ordering you to land or be shot down! :O :O :D :D After being forced to land than your pilot can get out of the spacecraft only to be taken away by government agents at that point you can decide whether to make a run for it or to travel with them and attempt to negotiate with 21st Century government agents that think you are an extraterrestrial! ;) :D :D
Black holes are lame in this game. You can just fly up to them no problem
Красиво нарисовали
Is this supposed to be awesome or something?
Just look at the black hole from interstellar or mass effect 2, that's what these puppies should be.
Black holes are the most boring thing in ED
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise Mass Effect 2 was released in 2010 and the concept was way before that.
Interstellar was released in 2014.
I'm sure Mass Effect thought of their design first off.
I know for Interstellar they talked about having had the computer do something completely different which generated it's concept. It was neat!
how the fuck did you get it to look not dark
Still very underwhelming. Looks more like the A..hole of the Universe!
That is pretty much what they are, yes 😂
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise Of course... Elite Dangerous is more real then reality! ;)
@@Prostreetsburnoutparadise Interstellar's black Hole Gargantua is very realistic though. Most of black holes in the Milky Way cannot have the disk around it, they're supposed to be black spots with intense lensing going around them. Frontier should only correct how the lensing works, adding the photon sphere and adding the color change to blue when we get too much close on them. Maybe for gameplay purposes, I'd say they should either remove the body exclusion zone or increase the distance from where it activates from the Black Hole. I'd love to see the disk around them, though probably only Sag. A and the Great Annihilator should have it.
@@LoScorpioneRosso1 There are at least a few stellar mass black holes in binary systems that should be close enough to the pair star to accrete matter from them. Those would also have accretion disks. Technically any pair of stars close enough together, particularly if one is smaller and denser, should be accreting from the neighbor star and creating an accretion disk.
@@t3hsilarn I'm not sure about it but that should be the same with some Neutron Stars. There's one close to the bubble that is so close to it's main star that it's model is stuck into it, so it looks like a main star with two eruption. I wonder if it's still like this after the update
No disk...still looks like a shit