Two Neat Properties of Cardioids

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 тра 2024
  • We prove two properties of cardioids of the form r = a(1 + cosθ). Firstly, we show that all chords passing through the origin have the same length. Secondly, we show that the tangents to the cardioid at either end of such a chord are perpendicular.
    00:00 Property 1
    02:36 Property 2
    02:51 Differentiating
    06:29 Perpendicularity
    10:12 Simplifying

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @wannabeactuary01
    @wannabeactuary01 26 днів тому +26

    These properties confirm I can't sketch cardiods.

  • @alipourzand6499
    @alipourzand6499 26 днів тому +10

    Some nice trig identitis appear in the final step of the second property:
    cos(t)^2 - sin(t)^2 = cos(2t)
    2sin(t)cos(t) = sin(2t)
    And then cos(2t) +/- cos(t) and sin(2t) +/- sint(t) can be transformed to products. It doesn't simplify the calculations but is interesting to use them. Great video

  • @BlokenArrow
    @BlokenArrow 26 днів тому +9

    Entertaining as always

  • @eduardoeller183
    @eduardoeller183 26 днів тому +6

    This begs the question... Is every curve satisfying these two properties a cardioid?

    • @bscutajar
      @bscutajar 25 днів тому +1

      Exactly my question as well

  • @lenskihe
    @lenskihe 26 днів тому +7

    The double angle identities were screaming at me the entire time. Don't know if they would have been useful and had made the calculations easier, but it was such a nice pattern:
    cos(2θ)+cos(θ)
    ---------------------------
    -(sin(2θ)+sin(θ))

    • @DrBarker
      @DrBarker  26 днів тому +3

      This is a good point! I didn't manage to find a way to use these when simplifying, but it would be interesting to see if there is another way of doing the calculations with the double angle identities.

    • @philippegaudreau
      @philippegaudreau 26 днів тому +1

      You can simplify to - cot(3 theta /2)

  • @dukenukem9770
    @dukenukem9770 26 днів тому +8

    These will be fun properties to add to my son’s list of derivations. Thanks for posting!

  • @ArthurvanH0udt
    @ArthurvanH0udt 26 днів тому +2

    At 6m15 imho an error with the minus sign as you pulled that minus out of the brackets so a plus is needed before the sin theta!

  • @decare696
    @decare696 21 день тому

    I think proving the perpendicularity using vectors is a bit more elegant.
    First note that the tangent lines are perpendicular iff the tangent vectors d(x,y)/dθ = (dx/dθ, dy/dθ) are.
    I'll use the double angle identities to simplify your expressions for dx/dθ and dy/dθ (as others have also pointed out):
    dx/dθ = a(-sin(2θ)-sin(θ))
    dy/dθ = a(cos(2θ)+cos(θ))
    Then, evaluate them at θ+π:
    dx/dθ[θ+π] = a(-sin(2θ)+sin(θ))
    dy/dθ[θ+π] = a(cos(2θ)-cos(θ))
    Then, the dot product of the two tangent vectors is
    dx/dθ · dx/dθ[θ+π] + dy/dθ · dy/dθ[θ+π]
    = a²((-sin(2θ)-sin(θ))(-sin(2θ)+sin(θ)) + (cos(2θ)+cos(θ))(cos(2θ)-cos(θ)))
    = a²(sin²(2θ) - sin²(θ) + cos²(2θ) - cos²(θ))
    = a²(sin²(2θ) + cos²(2θ) - (sin²(θ) + cos²(θ)))
    = a²(1-1) = 0.
    Thus, the tangent lines are always perpendicular.
    This approach has the added benefit of also working when dx/dθ = 0.

  • @Fereydoon.Shekofte
    @Fereydoon.Shekofte 26 днів тому +2

    Thank you very much for all of your efforts Dr🎉🎉❤❤

  • @holyshit922
    @holyshit922 26 днів тому +5

    dy/dx = - (cos(2t)+cos(t))/(sin(2t)+sin(t))
    dy/dx = -(2cos(3t/2)cos(t/2))/(2sin(3t/2)cos(t/2))
    dy/dx = -cot(3t/2)
    I used your calculations but simplified the result of this derivative
    After simplification we will have
    (-cot(3t/2))*(-cot(3(t+π)/2)) = -cot(3t/2)*(-cot(3t/2+π+π/2))
    (-cot(3t/2))*(-cot(3(t+π)/2)) = -cot(3t/2)*(-cot(3t/2+π/2))
    (-cot(3t/2))*(-cot(3(t+π)/2)) = -cot(3t/2)*(tan(3t/2))
    (-cot(3t/2))*(-cot(3(t+π)/2)) = -1
    Conclusion: Lines are perpendicular

    • @DrBarker
      @DrBarker  26 днів тому +3

      Very nice, a neat use of the sum to product identities!

  • @BsktImp
    @BsktImp 26 днів тому +1

    Does 1/(df/dx) always equal dx/df? My maths teacher insisted _ad infinitum_ derivatives are not fractions.

    • @DrBarker
      @DrBarker  26 днів тому +3

      This does work, so long as df/dx ≠ 0, but it doesn't mean the derivates should actually be thought of as a fraction. If you're interested, I have an old video which explores why this property doesn't work for second derivatives: ua-cam.com/video/DCocnAxCFgk/v-deo.html

  • @ppantnt
    @ppantnt 26 днів тому +1

    using angle sum for cos(theta+pi) is probably an overkill
    Could've just use the period of cos function to get cos(theta+pi) is equal to cos(theta)

    • @drdca8263
      @drdca8263 26 днів тому +2

      ... -cos(theta) you mean?

  • @TimNoyce
    @TimNoyce 24 дні тому

    Stellar explanations, really clear and approachable. Thank you!

  • @pierreabbat6157
    @pierreabbat6157 25 днів тому

    What's the orthoptic of a cardioid?

  • @kmyc89
    @kmyc89 26 днів тому

    I prefere r=r0(1-sin(deta)),
    which I figured out somewhere at 2008, and the first time I found on the internet, was like 2018.

    • @kmyc89
      @kmyc89 26 днів тому

      Or 2014
      ua-cam.com/video/1VNlWXSJjN4/v-deo.html

  • @MinMax-kc8uj
    @MinMax-kc8uj 26 днів тому

    Too much brain hurt. I know this is important in the 3d waves I'm looking at, but it's too much. The cycle doesn't repeat, but there are cardioids. Providing, I pick and choose the correct numbers.

  • @MrConverse
    @MrConverse 26 днів тому

    The way you pronounce the trig functions gets on my nerves. Why not just say ‘cosine’ instead of saying ‘coz’? If you’re going to insist on ‘coz’ then you should say ‘sin’ too, not ‘sine’ as you do say.
    Please just say ‘sine’, ‘cosine’, & ‘tangent’. You’ll make at least one channel fan happy.

    • @dave-bk6vt
      @dave-bk6vt 26 днів тому

      he is British that is how it is done, don't ask what shine and cosh mean...

    • @donegal79
      @donegal79 25 днів тому

      OK Karen