Immunotherapy: Boosting the immune system to fight cancer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 тра 2024
  • The concept of 'teaching' the immune system to recognize and destroy cancer cells is over a century old, but the development of immunotherapeutic strategies for cancer was slow for many decades. However, much has been learned about the immune system in the meantime, and with the recent approval of two new immunotherapeutic anticancer drugs and several drugs in late-stage development, a new era in anticancer immunotherapy is beginning.
    The video takes an audio-visual journey through the different approaches that are being investigated to harness the immune system to treat cancer.
    For more, check out the Nature Reviews Drug Discovery poster: www.nature.com/nrd/posters/can...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 176

  • @SBTRIS
    @SBTRIS 5 років тому +10

    Would love to see an updated video, showing how these treatments have evolved, the good, the bad, the ugly. Tonnes has happened in 7 years.

  • @ishouldbesleeping1354
    @ishouldbesleeping1354 5 років тому +4

    An excellent video that easily explained the newest approach to cancer 2019

  • @alicececille7687
    @alicececille7687 6 років тому +3

    Such a good video! Thank you so much for making and narrate this video 😊

  • @mandanamashoof3015
    @mandanamashoof3015 7 років тому

    Great explanation. Thanks a bunch.

  • @SuperVincent53
    @SuperVincent53 10 років тому +21

    Good presentation,the cure is out there my mom died 35 years ago of colon cancer and the progress so far is early detection. I want to try some of my ideas ,I want to actually cure someone not treat,cut,burn or poison.CURE CURE CURE !!!!!!!!

  • @gman6531
    @gman6531 4 роки тому +1

    thank you i'm fighting Blood Cancer

  • @jworules
    @jworules 10 років тому

    This video is really good, thanks!

  • @100gsun
    @100gsun 10 років тому

    great animation! the idea definitely appears promising but given patient-by-patient variations, how effective does and will it actually work in humans especially at a population level?

  • @matchmedicines8209
    @matchmedicines8209 3 роки тому

    thanks a lot

  • @jaderule6459
    @jaderule6459 6 років тому

    Would this work if you have cirrhosis of liver and spleen and lymph damage?
    I mean if you have all white blood cells can these Tx work?

  • @calvinlee4935
    @calvinlee4935 10 років тому +1

    Steven, you explained the probabljty

  • @omiolo
    @omiolo 12 років тому

    I have always wondered about "adoptive cell transfer". That seems like the answer to me.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    For a cell to spontaneously fit together from random pairings of all the amino acids in a "soup" would require them to be in a certain order, and would require some, but not all, amino acids joining together.
    Now, here's the kicker. All the possible combinations are larger than the time necessary to even contemplate them all on the fastest supercomputers. But the necessary exclusions are even larger, and give us a way to calculate the many possible combinations required for life.

  • @nurgulkaraalioglu5840
    @nurgulkaraalioglu5840 6 років тому

    Teşekkürler 😊

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Planck time (~ 5.4 × 10 to the -44 seconds power) is the unit of time in the system of natural units known as Planck units. Current established physical theories are believed to fail at this time scale, and many physicists expect that the Planck time might be the smallest unit of time that could ever be measured, even in principle.
    So, now we simply multiply:
    13.7 billion years = 13,700,000,000 years.
    31,557,600 seconds per year
    x Planck time.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    In scientific notion:
    Years = 1.37 x 10 to the 10th power
    Seconds = 3.1 x 10 to the 7th power
    Planck time = 5.4 x 10 to the 44th power number of parts of a second.
    To multiply, you simply multiply the first numbers, and add the exponents.
    1.37 x 3.1 x 5.4 = 22.9
    10 + 7 + 44 = 61

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому +1

    That shows that information never happens apart from intelligence, yet cells contain huge amounts of information. I believe this is the most important single evidence that life came from the mind of an intelligent Creator rather than from dumb chemicals.

  • @Mumiangel
    @Mumiangel 12 років тому +1

    If possible, can you help us with subtitles in Spanish for this great video. I've some relatives suffering from cancer. Thanks a lot.!!!

    • @itejash6296
      @itejash6296 3 роки тому

      Whats theirs position now. Hopefully good

  • @umu-i-d2785
    @umu-i-d2785 2 роки тому +1

    Would love to see more Cancer prevention techniques, rather than Cancer treatment. But unfortunately there is little money in prevention, and a lot of it in treatment.

  • @christinaphillips5933
    @christinaphillips5933 5 років тому

    This is done in hope hospital in Mexico lady heard

  • @mohammad-hoseinkhani7915
    @mohammad-hoseinkhani7915 3 роки тому

    9 years passed and no new videos

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Given the number of amino acids required, and excluded, for even the most simple living cell, various math scholars have estimated the "chances" of life forming, at up to 1 in 10 to the 40,000th power. I remember finding the book that says that, in the library at the University of Colorado, in the days before there was an internet widely available.
    BUT NO ONE CALCULATED how many chances the Universe gives us to see if that can happen.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    We actually need to use standard scientific notation rounding standards to take that number and round it right back up to 40,000 again, because the original number, 40,000 is accurate to only one digit, so the final number must be rounded back to one digit.
    And if we use the larger figure of the chances needed for a cell forming of 1 in 10 to the 340,000,000th power, and subtract 142, we can really see how ridiculous it is, as:
    340,000,000 - 142 = 339,999,858.

  • @tumourfreetim
    @tumourfreetim 5 років тому +1

    Thnx 4 vid. To fight stage 4 lung cancer I made 39 diet & lifestyle changes & had 4 treatments. Given 3 months to live in feb 2017. Today happily tumourfreetim

    • @MaxineAGGuess
      @MaxineAGGuess 5 років тому +1

      Amen! God is great tumourfreetim!

    • @tumourfreetim
      @tumourfreetim 5 років тому +2

      Maxine A.G. Guess There are things apart from diet and exercise needed to boost your immune system - an acceptance of death is also needed to get past the worrying anxiety of a death sentence. In addition to that I needed a reconnection with the universal creation that we are part of. Some call that faith, some call that mother nature or a love of life itself. At some point I will cover both of these subjects as my level of anxiety impacted on the immune system and getting to a point of peace, wonderment and gratitude with the universe was required to help create an optimum immune system.

  • @p.boscardin
    @p.boscardin 5 років тому +1

    Science is awesome

  • @sygmundklimczak9802
    @sygmundklimczak9802 8 років тому

    Now we have dr David Noakes ans his new method to clean GcMAF

  • @WeakSideIndulgence
    @WeakSideIndulgence 12 років тому

    Just because a treatment is approved doesn't mean it's no longer experimental! We never know everything about nything in science.... that's its beauty.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    De Duve, a Nobel Prize winning scientist writes:
    “In all modern organisms, DNA contains in encrypted form the instructions for the manufacture of proteins. More specifically, encoded within DNA is the exact order in which amino acids, selected at each step from 20 distinct varieties should be strung together to form all of the organism’s proteins.”

  • @kennyhill2678
    @kennyhill2678 2 роки тому

    my family without cancer, might still be here

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    So, we get 22.9 x 10 to the 61st power number of times in the entire age of the universe, or:
    2.3 x 10 to the 62nd power number of times in the age of the universe.
    Now, we multiply that, by the total number of atoms, which is 10 to the 80th power.

  • @k1morisato889
    @k1morisato889 2 роки тому

    I come because of homework. Nice video.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    An event that would require hundreds of thousands of molecules made up of atoms and thousands of amino acids made up of molecules would mean that you would have thousands and thousands of times fewer chances, of course, so the number of chances for life forming from molecular amino acids would be far less, perhaps a million times less, or perhaps only by 10 to the 7th or 9th power, but we can work with the higher figure.

  • @angelieavenie5741
    @angelieavenie5741 2 роки тому

    Why can't we start this already. and, make the drugs available to more patients.

  • @Mumiangel
    @Mumiangel 12 років тому

    I have relatives with cancer, but they doesn't speak english..can somebody translate this in spanish, please??? I would do it but I dont know making sub-titles

  • @jaderule6459
    @jaderule6459 6 років тому

    So can these things help prevent cancer then?

    • @jaderule6459
      @jaderule6459 6 років тому

      Should we get these vaccines now then?

    • @TheRdamterror
      @TheRdamterror 6 років тому

      to prevent or cure smoke weed its as simpel as that
      ua-cam.com/video/7tpybaOgPrA/v-deo.html

  • @rhondah1587
    @rhondah1587 12 років тому

    I sincerely hope you really aren't thanking a nonexistent supernatual entity for these new innovations in science and medicine. I would instead be thanking all those human beings that cared enough to learn the existing science and keep pushing its boundaries. It is only through hard won knowledge built upon new knowledge and discovery will humankind progress.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Simple, add the exponents: 62 plus 80 = 142. Nobody can argue with that.
    Surely, nobody can have difficulty following such simple math, so I assume everyone is with me then?
    2.3 x 10 to the 142nd power represents the maximum number of "atom level" events that can take place in the entire universe, over 13.7 billion years.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Can matter compose information? Many evolutionists claim that life arose from an “organic soup,” but how could the imagined “organic soup” know the precise order of each of the amino acids of even one protein, let alone that of the hundreds of proteins that a “primitive” cell would have needed to survive?

  • @Divine_Mortal
    @Divine_Mortal 5 років тому +2

    In god’s will we will find a cure

  • @mayaforpeaceful
    @mayaforpeaceful 10 років тому +1

    over 200 types of cancer ?
    OMG......

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    The current best evolutionary based theory is that the maximum age of the Universe is 13.7 billion years, so let's go with that. (I actually believe the Universe could have been, and was more likely formed, in 6 literal 24 hour days, about 6000 years ago, but that's also besides the point, and not required to get into for the purposes of our discussion here.)

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Therefore without all the dimensions of time, THERE IS NO CAUSE AND EFFECTall things that could exist in such a realm would have no need of being caused, but would have always existed.

  • @rhondah1587
    @rhondah1587 12 років тому +1

    Just a friendly reminder. Sermons are reserved for those who are selling invisible products.

  • @sophiehoult6417
    @sophiehoult6417 8 років тому

    My son starts this tomorrow. I don't even know what to expect..

    • @619pokefan
      @619pokefan 8 років тому

      How is he?

    • @TheRdamterror
      @TheRdamterror 6 років тому

      i found that smoking weed helps to kill of cancer
      the THC in weed is like giving your bloodcels AK47s and rocket luchers to atack it
      ua-cam.com/video/7tpybaOgPrA/v-deo.html

    • @christiansantiago330
      @christiansantiago330 3 роки тому

      how is he now?

  • @inactive2305
    @inactive2305 2 роки тому

    love how they talk about doing 1 each...um, it's cancer, ya better do at least 2 or 3

  • @jeebersjumpincryst
    @jeebersjumpincryst 12 років тому

    wow... that almost sounded like a little sermon

  • @Makedonche
    @Makedonche 11 років тому

    Why are you bothering to respond to a troll?

  • @rhondah1587
    @rhondah1587 12 років тому

    Sure it does, at least for those who live in reality.

  • @Thenormalguy101
    @Thenormalguy101 10 років тому

    Just believe what you want to believe people......
    not my decision

  • @evila9076
    @evila9076 6 років тому +1

    why are arguing over god's existence in a cancer treatment video

  • @justmike5446
    @justmike5446 4 роки тому

    Healthy cells=healthy people=no cancer

  • @goofybutserious4807
    @goofybutserious4807 2 роки тому

    Dude this video was 9 years ago. where's the desperately needed technology?

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Oh and please explain why I'm wrong, instead of all the insults and not responding to my arguments directly. Much appreciated, thank you. :) Explain directly to each post :P
    We both can never prove god's existence or god's non-existence, at least not now, but "I" believe that he exists because it makes much more sense to me.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Now I'll explain why I find evolution ridiculous. If you need to roll nothing but 6 sixes on one roll of the dice, it's 1/6th chance times 1/6th chance times, etc., 6 times, or 1/6th to the 6th power. That's .0000214 of a chance, or, taking the inverse, you will roll it, on average, once in 46,656 attempts. It's undeniable math.

  • @alanahduncan2634
    @alanahduncan2634 3 роки тому

    I loved your work a lot. I've been trying to research for a UA-cam video like yours that really teaches everything in this UA-cam vid! 👨‍⚕️Your video actually is like the content from Dr Ethan! Doctor's explanations are knowledgable and I learned a lot for wellness! He is a respected Dr.
    You should watch his channel out and give the medical student a like! ➡️ #DoctorEthanQandA

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому +4

    Cells are the basic structures of life, and I believe that the plans for life wouldn't have had existed without god. For example follow the interdependence of the sequence of events as proteins are assembled solely in the living cell (which came first the cell or the instructions used within it -- and nowhere else), yet you say chance.

  • @dparkes6
    @dparkes6 12 років тому

    Invisibility doesn't make it any less real

  • @ashwadhwani
    @ashwadhwani 5 років тому +2

    Truth and kindness are the best medicine. Else you will get WHAT YOU DESERVE !

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Evolution is based on the idea that with enough time, evolution can happen. But, that's not true, as the numbers show. Here's why it's not true. A single cell forming would be an event. Nobody can argue with that. Every event requires both a time and a place. Nobody can argue with that. The smallest event, at the least, requires the smallest length of measurable time, and at least two particles to create an interaction.

  • @dparkes6
    @dparkes6 12 років тому

    Just try searching for this proof. If u don't find anything I'm sure the world will gladly take u back.

  • @Makedonche
    @Makedonche 11 років тому +1

    BIG BALLS!

  • @JLEB956
    @JLEB956 11 років тому

    rhonda is definitely not a scientist.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    The principle is not, ‘Everything has a cause’; Bertrand Russell misstated it. No, the principle is, ‘Everything that has a beginning has a sufficient cause’. One is that God exists outside of time. Since we live in a universe of cause and effect, we naturally assume that this is the only way in which any kind of existence can function. However, the premise is false.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    The thing is, I showed proof, not evidence, but rather proof of "my belief". Therefore, your point is invalid, as no one really knows how the codes for life come to creation, but I "believe" that if you put god into that picture, it makes more sense. How can one explain this sophisticated messaging, coding, residing in our cells? According to information science, information can only be produced by intelligence. Highly complex information must originate from a highly intelligent source.

  • @goodthinkingtv
    @goodthinkingtv 8 років тому +7

    Sheila is saying that the research is looking in the wrong direction when it comes to cancer and disease in general. I have had a lot of cancer in my family and the ones who were treated naturally (naturopathically) are still alive today and the others have passed away. I believe nature is the way to go, the direction we are heading in allopathic-ally seems rather Frankenstein like.

  • @Makedonche
    @Makedonche 11 років тому

    OOhh that's going to really hurt the religious trolls.

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    Again, a low minimum number of chances needed for life forming at random are about 1 in 10 to the 40,000th power.
    And a high maximum number of chances in the universe is only 1 in 10 to the 142nd power. To get the actual odds then, we merely subtract the exponents.
    40,000 minus 142 = 39,858.
    In other words, the total number of chances available in the entire universe didn't help increase the possibility of evolution in the slightest bit! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

  • @sking388
    @sking388 11 років тому

    I too live in the real world, yet I still believe in god. You see, the bible suggests there was a beginning of things, suggests an outline of "from-simple-to-complex-development". Verses from Genesis are also backed up by science. Different people have different opinions, it's just like someone arguing with the existence of Santa. He believes Santa is true, and you know why Santa is real? Because he "believes" he's real. These are human perceptions of reality that lead to controversial opinions.

  • @rhondah1587
    @rhondah1587 11 років тому

    Sad debunked arguments.