Vacuum and Air Pressure

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @rohansharma5680
    @rohansharma5680 6 місяців тому +2

    You need a medal 🏅

  • @pocketsjazz
    @pocketsjazz 4 роки тому +2

    This video is so easy to follow and helped me understand suction properties and air pressure. Thanks!

  • @teddyperera8531
    @teddyperera8531 4 роки тому +1

    superb explanation

  • @mohammedalobaid5049
    @mohammedalobaid5049 Рік тому

    This is a good teaching

  • @SenjiaMurtic
    @SenjiaMurtic 8 місяців тому

    Amazing, holding my hand! 🤝

  • @mitchs2148
    @mitchs2148 Рік тому

    Thanks for making this video 😁

  • @zoomtruth1013
    @zoomtruth1013 2 роки тому +1

    Is there an experiment that shows a pressure system existing within a vacuum with no physical barrier separating the two?

  • @united3689
    @united3689 7 місяців тому

    thank you for this video

  • @timdunk7278
    @timdunk7278 3 роки тому

    Awesome, thank you.

  • @ag135i
    @ag135i 2 роки тому

    Can we launch projectiles with the help of vacuum

  • @MahamadHassan-sy1qe
    @MahamadHassan-sy1qe Рік тому

    You are good

  • @zeeenk1
    @zeeenk1 4 роки тому

    i am curious. when vacuum is in a chamber like that with a gauge, is it measured in negative pascals or positive pascal? if not why doesn't vacuum get measured as negative presser with a (-) negative symbol attached to its value?

    • @barbarossa11
      @barbarossa11 3 роки тому

      From what I understand, the vacuum is measured in positive pascals and has a value close to 0. What’s keeping the two spheres connected is not a “suction” from the inside, but atmospheric pressure from the outside, as discussed at the beginning of the video.

  • @silverumbrella8058
    @silverumbrella8058 5 років тому +3

    Thank you for showing us that a vacuum can’t exist next to gas pressure... they both need there own containers

    • @tarmonkey666
      @tarmonkey666 5 років тому +1

      Yep! That's why globe earth is a lie. There's many more reasons but this is one even science cant refute, but they still do with "gravity".

    • @JSSTyger
      @JSSTyger 4 роки тому

      How did the air leave the vacuum?

    • @silverumbrella8058
      @silverumbrella8058 4 роки тому

      JSSTyger it doesn’t... that is the point... in order for us to have pressure on earth, it needs to be contained

    • @JSSTyger
      @JSSTyger 4 роки тому

      @@silverumbrella8058 you can suck air out of a bottle through a straw and create a vacuum. The air leaves the bottle because of a force pulling it out. You are essentially replicating exactly what gravity has been said to do for 350 years. It pulls...and it is a constant pull. Everything tends toward the Earth, including air. Like a strong magnet.

    • @silverumbrella8058
      @silverumbrella8058 4 роки тому

      JSSTyger you are one confused person... sorry for you... the earth is flat ... there is no need for gravity... things fall down or go up because of the density of the object

  • @Leongon
    @Leongon 5 років тому

    The right word feels like it should be hemispheres instead of spheres.

  • @boptah7489
    @boptah7489 5 років тому +3

    Thank you for explaining that a rocket cannot work in space. .We kinda suspected it anyway , co of the rubbish moon landing film footage.

    • @hera9191
      @hera9191 4 роки тому

      Why do you think that rocket cannot work in space? It works even better in vacuum because it caries its own oxidizer.

    • @boptah7489
      @boptah7489 4 роки тому +1

      @@hera9191 No. A rocket needs pressure behind it to force it forwards. That is the whole point of a rocket. It needs pressure. And you cannot create pressure in a vacuum.

    • @hera9191
      @hera9191 4 роки тому +1

      @@boptah7489 1) "A rocket needs pressure behind it": That is not true, rocket engine use action-reaction law (Newton's third law) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_engine . Same principe as "conservation of momentum", you can make your own experiment with billiard balls. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum#Conservation
      2) "you cannot create pressure in a vacuum": not relevant but also not true, you can easy create pressure for example with burning rocket fuel

  • @levoyfoster8510
    @levoyfoster8510 7 років тому +4

    so how is our atmosphere not dissipating into the vacuum?
    on earth we cannot create two opposing pressure systems with out a barrier seperating them?
    I:E a negative pressure system against a pressuerised system
    in reality whichever is smaller would equalibrate into the larger system?
    and if there is a vacuum it would be vast in relation to our atmosphere
    a 330 year old theory does not allow us to demonstrate this practically

    • @levoyfoster8510
      @levoyfoster8510 7 років тому +1

      not flat
      can i suggest you watch the video above before you tell me our atmosphere isn't pressurised
      are you claiming the teacher/physicist in the video is liar as well??
      and still you quote theory's to argue against facts
      you truly are delusional

    • @levoyfoster8510
      @levoyfoster8510 7 років тому +1

      not flat
      yes to all
      but citing variances in pressure just means its a pressurised system
      that incorporates pressure differences
      so all you have basically done is prove we live in a pressurised system??
      i couldnt have put it better myself thank you

    • @planereality3675
      @planereality3675 5 років тому +1

      Clearly you cant have a pressurized system next to a vacuum

    • @hera9191
      @hera9191 4 роки тому +1

      Air pressure gradually decrease with altitude. So with higher altitude you are slowly closer and closer to the "ideal" vacuum.
      Same effect you can observe in weather forecast, you can see that in two cities in same country is different air pressure without container between them.
      To have pressure gradient is possible in reality. The force which make air pressure on Earth is gravity.

    • @mojoshop839
      @mojoshop839 4 роки тому +1

      @@hera9191 I sure hope you don't believe the unverifiable nonsense you dribbled