FE Water Resources Engineering Review Session 2022

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 78

  • @MarkMattsonPE
    @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +28

    There was a hiccup in the stream at about 57:00 where the session dropped the connection for about a minute. I apologize for the drop, but hopefully it doesn't take too much away from the entire session or that particular problem. If you have any questions, please drop a comment below. I hope the session helps in your FE review!

  • @coffeeman_ran
    @coffeeman_ran 9 місяців тому +6

    A year later coming back to say thank you for ALL the study material to help me pass my FE last week! You're greatly appreciated Mark!

  • @drdoominstien713
    @drdoominstien713 Рік тому +9

    I know that this is a lazy way to arrive to the answer for question 6, but I think the question was designed such that math is not necessary. If you want to supply pressure with a pump to a place that is Verticaly above you, your going to have to supply greater pressure than the amount needed at that higher elevation. only one answer fits that so youd be able to immediatly pick that.

    • @shamanaveed9329u
      @shamanaveed9329u Рік тому +2

      true

    • @jamshidpishgam3630
      @jamshidpishgam3630 Місяць тому

      you mean the Answer to this question is wrong? I am confused why he didn't add one more head loss which is difference in elevation 235-210= 25ft

  • @kylelong9831
    @kylelong9831 2 роки тому +20

    For number 9 you can use the calculators "num solve" function to calculate H quickly. A very useful tool in my opinion

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +7

      Thanks Kyle Long! A great tip that will help someone for sure. Getting familiar with the calculator can save so much time.

    • @garretthope7427
      @garretthope7427 2 роки тому +2

      Thanks Kyle, that's a super helpful tip!

    • @Whacker409
      @Whacker409 Рік тому +1

      Try it. Shift solve with raise to 3/2 equation? There are alot of answer if you do that.

    • @Omar-up4iz
      @Omar-up4iz 3 місяці тому

      @@Whacker409 The calculator tells you how many answers there are with the L-R=number when you put in this equation it only has one answer

  • @twigsfloat2773
    @twigsfloat2773 Рік тому +3

    I'm taking the FE exam (Civil) at the end of the month and haven't taken any Water Resources or Environmental Engineering courses. I'm so happy to find these videos you put up. Thank you!

  • @thomassbahtu1503
    @thomassbahtu1503 2 роки тому +11

    You bring wide concepts and touch essential topics. Thank you!

  • @rackets97
    @rackets97 2 роки тому +11

    For question 8, if you have the TI-36X pro (NCEES approved), you can use the num-solv function to solve for H I believe.

    • @Abcdefg123.97
      @Abcdefg123.97 8 місяців тому

      i am getting totally different numbers ((

  • @sanchez1185759
    @sanchez1185759 Рік тому +4

    @1:16:15 another good option is to use the "num-solv" on the TI-36x pro calculator .

  • @ludaelhasia9052
    @ludaelhasia9052 2 роки тому +15

    Hey Mark, Thank you for your amazing lectures! Super beneficial and I can't wait to take My FE on the 11th of June and pass it .

  • @DatNguyen-wi3fs
    @DatNguyen-wi3fs 2 роки тому +5

    You're incredible as always Mark. Thanks so much

  • @buddy7658
    @buddy7658 3 місяці тому

    Appreciate you Mark! What you do goes underappreciated.

  • @rajivunome
    @rajivunome 3 місяці тому +1

    1:52:24 should it be 12.1 Mg in the denominator ?

  • @MT5566MT
    @MT5566MT 2 роки тому +2

    Hey Mark, for question 7, I believe that residual pressure and pitot pressure should be two different things. Usually, in the field, we take a separate measurement for residual pressure. It seems like those two terms are used as the same thing in the video which is a little strange, considering the fact that they are two different concepts.

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +2

      @Morgan Teng thanks so much for the clarification! I updated the problem sheet so that the given residual and pitot pressures are both listed as 45 psi. You are correct, they are indeed two separate measurements and two concepts. Thanks!

  • @fioredl92
    @fioredl92 5 місяців тому +1

    Hey, Mark! Thanks for sharing the material and putting time and effort on this :) It's very helpful. Quick question: for problem 4, you chose the option C which is 150 m3/sec, but the formula gave you a 105 m3/s flow. Was it a mistake or there is an explanation that I am missing for that? Thank you!!

  • @danielperezrigual136
    @danielperezrigual136 Рік тому +1

    In Q9 L is the length according to the Handbook, while the problem gives you width and it doesn't say it is rectangular. Also Q is 125 cfs as given in the question, why did you use Q as 90 cfs?

  • @Fatima_6798
    @Fatima_6798 5 місяців тому +1

    quick question, in number 6 math you have started with P1 being 0 whereas if we had taken the P1 as "x" which is the required pressure at pump, we would get x/gamma=159' and solved "x" for psi then we could get the same answer. Hp was a very confusing bit for me.

  • @danielj.berrios960
    @danielj.berrios960 2 роки тому +2

    The Greatest Review ever !!!

  • @billyswort4015
    @billyswort4015 2 роки тому

    Great series very happy to find this series. Taking the FE in July.

  • @alexarmendariz8263
    @alexarmendariz8263 2 роки тому

    For questions 12 it would have been faster if you were to use D/4 for the hydraulic radius of a circular pipe

  • @user-nw2ny6yd4b
    @user-nw2ny6yd4b 8 місяців тому +3

    On the first question, i use I as 5.3 and i got the Q volume is 21.2, which answer should i choose at this point if i am doing this at FE?

    • @Yayudalwlwywi-lz5pb
      @Yayudalwlwywi-lz5pb 2 місяці тому +1

      Me too
      I think ate accurate point for 11 minutes it's 5.3
      And the correct answer changes to D-22 cfs

  • @jossyurael9042
    @jossyurael9042 8 місяців тому

    Hi Mark! I think you forget the fitting loss. Thank you.

  • @jossyurael9042
    @jossyurael9042 8 місяців тому +1

    Mark, I don't understand, why you divide 92.4mg/l by 80 present? I know that we use only 80 presents. But what type of relation you use to reach on this decision? thank you?

  • @martyarizona
    @martyarizona 6 місяців тому

    I cannot find euler's constant in the manual. I suppose I'll just have to memorize that, but it isn't within the calculator or anywhere in the manual. I even searched by the number itself

  • @faceofbear8024
    @faceofbear8024 5 місяців тому +3

    I'm here for the Environmental FE review.

  • @Kj-qn5xe
    @Kj-qn5xe Рік тому +1

    I thank God for you

  • @Olayinka.D
    @Olayinka.D Рік тому +2

    Hello Mark! Thank you or this video. please what textbook do you recommend for an in depth study of water resources for the FE?

  • @jossyurael9042
    @jossyurael9042 8 місяців тому

    My exam is Wednesday 27/2023. after two days.

  • @user-iq6gl1ly6u
    @user-iq6gl1ly6u 2 роки тому +3

    Hi! I had a question on Problem 15.. Why do you divide it by 80% purity instead of multiplying it?

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +8

      If it's only 80% purity, you need to divide to get the total amount you need. When you divide by 80%, the larger amount will be what you need. If you take 80% of the larger amount, you have the right amount.

  • @Whacker409
    @Whacker409 Рік тому +1

    Problem 1 i = 5.5

  • @Mmhappy1
    @Mmhappy1 Рік тому +2

    for Q6, how did you get headloss=13.82 ft?? I've tried re-entering it into my calculator several different ways and continue to get 26,224.25... Please help.

    • @shamanaveed9329u
      @shamanaveed9329u Рік тому

      Q=0.223,D=0.20,C=135,L=200 Try again with these values....

    • @kenlua6064
      @kenlua6064 3 місяці тому

      I had the same issue but I mistakenly read the pipe diameter as 1/2" instead of 2-1/2"

  • @hjjjhh5774
    @hjjjhh5774 Рік тому

    Thanks for the video!

  • @user-nq8nm5pd9w
    @user-nq8nm5pd9w 7 місяців тому +2

    48:00 where is he getting the hp from? its not in the manual.

    • @Matt_Lindsay
      @Matt_Lindsay 4 місяці тому

      The head developed by a pump as hp = -w/g, but work term w is negative for a pump, therefore the head developed by a bump hp, is always positive. I didn't see it in the manual either, just have to account for it in the energy equation.

    • @jamshidpishgam3630
      @jamshidpishgam3630 Місяць тому +1

      You add Hp whenever there is pump involved. It should be a separate equation but it's not in FE.

  • @jaslynperrodin2518
    @jaslynperrodin2518 2 роки тому +2

    For question 9, where did Q=90 cfs come from?

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +3

      I have no idea why I wrote down 90 cfs. I'm sorry for the confusion! The flow in the problem is 125 cfs and that's what I used for the solution.
      Trying to do the problems, respond to comments and produce the videos can make things messy at times (there's a lot to think about). Thanks for asking!

  • @samuelwubu9503
    @samuelwubu9503 2 роки тому

    Hi Mark, Thanks for your best video. in the 1st question each area has different rainfall intensity. why do you use same rainfall intensity for both?

  • @user-ov6uk2bl1q
    @user-ov6uk2bl1q 6 місяців тому

    Thank you very much ❤

  • @69Sev96
    @69Sev96 2 роки тому

    Do the exam solutions usually use all the given data in one way or another? i.e on question 16 there is a hint that we need a second equation since the given k value had not been used in the first equation we solved. I know some exams will throw out "red herring" info that isn't needed to solve. It seems like FE questions normally use all the given data? general thoughts feelings on this?

  • @hunterhebert6287
    @hunterhebert6287 Рік тому

    Mark,
    On my previous fe they gave me a problem with two weirs with 2 different heights. If this so happens to be on my fe again, would you do 2 weir formulas and then the solutions to both formulas together to get the total?
    Thanks

  • @sharil6436
    @sharil6436 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much.

  • @TruckSpot_Haven
    @TruckSpot_Haven Рік тому

    Thanks!

  • @jchiro5018
    @jchiro5018 2 роки тому

    On problem #1, why is the intensity dependent on time of concentration? The clouds don’t care about the time of concentration of some place it’s passing by, what am I missing here? Would appreciate very much your input

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +1

      As long as the storm lasts long enough to get to the time of concentration, that's the peak flow (intensity). The whole watershed will be contributing to the outlet at that time.
      Here's a reference: "A storm with duration equal to the time of concentration will have the full watershed contributing to the runoff at the outlet, (and thus reach peak flow rate) just before the storm ends. A storm of duration greater than the time of concentration, and the same recurrence interval, will be less intense."
      www.cedengineering.com/userfiles/Rational%20Method%20with%20Excel-R1.pdf

  • @zainaaboujanb2737
    @zainaaboujanb2737 2 роки тому

    For question 5, do we get a hydraulic jump if either the upstream wasn't supercritical or downstream wasn't subcritical?

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +5

      A hydraulic jump by definition occurs where the flow transitions from supercritical to subcritical. If both are the same, both super or both sub, there is not jump. Does that make sense?

  • @MN-qc9fn
    @MN-qc9fn 2 роки тому

    why not use Hazel Williams instead of Manning's for question #4? Thanks!

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +7

      Manning's is typically used for open channel flow. Hazen Williams is typically used for pressurized flow.

  • @DatNguyen-wi3fs
    @DatNguyen-wi3fs 2 роки тому

    1:45:49 Hi Mark I thought it said that P is the fraction of ww sample volume to total combined volume. Does it mean that it's 306 ml instead?

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +1

      You're correct that "P = fraction of wastewater sample volume to total combined volume." I should have written 294 mL in blue. Because it's a 300 mL bottle, the 6 mL is diluted in a total of 300 mL. You can only add 294 more mL to a 300 mL bottle. I didn't write that very clearly in the hand written portion. Thanks for the clarification!

    • @DatNguyen-wi3fs
      @DatNguyen-wi3fs 2 роки тому

      @@MarkMattsonPE oh I see. Thanks for confirming !

  • @rxqueen333
    @rxqueen333 2 роки тому +4

    Love the jokes!

  • @be1062
    @be1062 Рік тому

    Thanks mark! I believe Q 6 could be solved in seconds without calc.

    • @shamanaveed9329u
      @shamanaveed9329u Рік тому +1

      How?
      send solution

    • @shatoojalal2319
      @shatoojalal2319 Рік тому

      hey, I believe he solved Q6 more complicated than it should. Do you have any other way you can share?

    • @kenlua6064
      @kenlua6064 3 місяці тому

      @@shatoojalal2319 you can try to ignore the headloss due to pipe friction (which took most of the time) and see that the answer is ~63feet

  • @marvincandelaria4861
    @marvincandelaria4861 2 роки тому

    until when they will finished the FE review?

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому

      The plan for this semester's review is to hold new review sessions each Tuesday through the end of April.

    • @marvincandelaria4861
      @marvincandelaria4861 2 роки тому

      @@MarkMattsonPE hi sir good morning, is there any online FE Civil reviewer problems online ? when i add to cart reviewer is cheap $29 compare to the shipment it is coat $99.99? What you can recommend? thanks .

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому

      I'm not sure what program you're talking about, but I'd talk with classmates or colleagues to get their first hand recommendations on additional practice problems.

  • @gurnamsingh2715
    @gurnamsingh2715 2 роки тому

    Thank you, this exam seems quite easy tbh.

  • @chickenjang2881
    @chickenjang2881 2 роки тому

    First of all, I really appreciate your videos, but I have one issue for watching them. Whenever you sigh, I felt you are tired and then I just wanted to turn off them. So, my wish is that I don't want to hear your sigh in your new videos. Thanks a lot!

    • @MarkMattsonPE
      @MarkMattsonPE  2 роки тому +8

      I appreciate the feedback. I'll do my best and probably try to drink more coffee :) Thanks!