That is what far right means. That's always what it meant. The questioning of the sacred cows that are being artificially pushed in the public zeitgeist.
The real enemy is big finance that controls everything (politicians, judges, police, media, star system, culture, ...) and wants to destroy Christian identity and traditional family because they are the greatest obstacle to full control over people. Muslim immigrants are part of the plan (also to exploit the resulting riots in order to impose a de facto dictatorship). Read GK Chesterton. Some quotes: The crimes of England, 1916: "The libel law [is] now used, not to crush lies about private life, but to crush truths about public life." What's wrong with the world, 1910: "In the quarrel earlier alluded to between the energetic Progressive and the obstinate Conservative (or, to talk a tenderer language, between Hudge and Gudge), the state of cross-purposes is at the present moment acute. The Tory says he wants to preserve family life in Cindertown; the Socialist very reasonably points out to him that in Cindertown at present there isn't any family life to preserve. But Hudge, the Socialist, in his turn, is highly vague and mysterious about whether he would preserve the family life if there were any; or whether he will try to restore it where it has disappeared. It is all very confusing. The Tory sometimes talks as if he wanted to tighten the domestic bonds that do not exist; the Socialist as if he wanted to loosen the bonds that do not bind anybody. The question we all want to ask of both of them is the original ideal question, "Do you want to keep the family at all?" If Hudge, the Socialist, does want the family he must be prepared for the natural restraints, distinctions and divisions of labor in the family. He must brace himself up to bear the idea of the woman having a preference for the private house and a man for the public house. He must manage to endure somehow the idea of a woman being womanly, which does not mean soft and yielding, but handy, thrifty, rather hard, and very humorous. He must confront without a quiver the notion of a child who shall be childish, that is, full of energy, but without an idea of independence; fundamentally as eager for authority as for information and butter-scotch. If a man, a woman and a child live together any more in free and sovereign households, these ancient relations will recur; and Hudge must put up with it. He can only avoid it by destroying the family, driving both sexes into sexless hives and hordes, and bringing up all children as the children of the state--like Oliver Twist. But if these stern words must be addressed to Hudge, neither shall Gudge escape a somewhat severe admonition. For the plain truth to be told pretty sharply to the Tory is this, that if he wants the family to remain, if he wants to be strong enough to resist the rending forces of our essentially savage commerce, he must make some very big sacrifices and try to equalize property. The overwhelming mass of the English people at this particular instant are simply too poor to be domestic. They are as domestic as they can manage; they are much more domestic than the governing class; but they cannot get what good there was originally meant to be in this institution, simply because they have not got enough money. The man ought to stand for a certain magnanimity, quite lawfully expressed in throwing money away: but if under given circumstances he can only do it by throwing the week's food away, then he is not magnanimous, but mean. The woman ought to stand for a certain wisdom which is well expressed in valuing things rightly and guarding money sensibly; but how is she to guard money if there is no money to guard? The child ought to look on his mother as a fountain of natural fun and poetry; but how can he unless the fountain, like other fountains, is allowed to play? What chance have any of these ancient arts and functions in a house so hideously topsy-turvy; a house where the woman is out working and the man isn't; and the child is forced by law to think his schoolmaster's requirements more important than his mother's? No, Gudge and his friends in the House of Lords and the Carlton Club must make up their minds on this matter, and that very quickly. If they are content to have England turned into a beehive and an ant-hill, decorated here and there with a few faded butterflies playing at an old game called domesticity in the intervals of the divorce court, then let them have their empire of insects; they will find plenty of Socialists who will give it to them. But if they want a domestic England, they must "shell out," as the phrase goes, to a vastly greater extent than any Radical politician has yet dared to suggest; they must endure burdens much heavier than the Budget and strokes much deadlier than the death duties; for the thing to be done is nothing more nor less than the distribution of the great fortunes and the great estates. We can now only avoid Socialism by a change as vast as Socialism. If we are to save property, we must distribute property, almost as sternly and sweepingly as did the French Revolution. If we are to preserve the family we must revolutionize the nation. ... The superstition of divorce, 1920: "It is exceedingly characteristic of the dreary decades before the War that the forms of freedom in which they seemed to specialise were suicide and divorce. I am not at the moment pronouncing on the moral problem of either; I am merely noting, as signs of those times, those two true or false counsels of despair; the end of life and the end of love. Other forms of freedom were being increasingly curtailed. Freedom indeed was the one thing that progressives and conservatives alike contemned. Socialists were largely concerned to prevent strikes, by State arbitration; that is, by adding another rich man to give the casting vote between rich and poor. Even in claiming what they called the right to work they tacitly surrendered the right to leave off working. Tories were preaching conscription, not so much to defend the independence of England as to destroy the independence of Englishmen. Liberals, of course, were chiefly interested in eliminating liberty, especially touching beer and betting. It was wicked to fight, and unsafe even to argue; for citing any certain and contemporary fact might land one in a libel action. As all these doors were successfully shut in our faces along the chilly and cheerless corridor of progress (with its glazed tiles) the doors of death and divorce alone stood open, or rather opened wider and wider. ... As we have already seen papers and public men to-day make a vast parade of the necessity of setting the poor man free to get a divorce. Now why are they so mortally anxious that he should be free to get a divorce, and not in the least anxious that he should be free to get anything else? ... The answer is, I regret to say, that this social campaign, in most though by no means all of its most prominent campaigners, relies in this matter on a very smug and pestilent piece of chalk. There are some advocates of democratic divorce who are really advocates of general democratic freedom; but they are the exceptions; I might say, with all respect, that they are the dupes. The omnipresence of the thing in the press and in political society is due to a motive precisely opposite to the motive professed. The modern rulers, who are simply the rich men, are really quite consistent in their attitude to the poor man. It is the same spirit which takes away his children under the pretence of order, which takes away his wife under the pretence of liberty. That which wishes, in the words of the comic song, to break up the happy home, is primarily anxious not to break up the much more unhappy factory. Capitalism, of course, is at war with the family, for the same reason which has led to its being at war with the Trade Union. This indeed is the only sense in which it is true that capitalism is connected with individualism. Capitalism believes in collectivism for itself and individualism for its enemies. It desires its victims to be individuals, or (in other words) to be atoms. For the word atom, in its clearest meaning (which is none too clear) might be translated as "individual." If there be any bond, if there be any brotherhood, if there be any class loyalty or domestic discipline, by which the poor can help the poor, these emancipators will certainly strive to loosen that bond or lift that discipline in the most liberal fashion. If there be such a brotherhood, these individualists will redistribute it in the form of individuals; or in other words smash it to atoms. The masters of modern plutocracy know what they are about. They are making no mistake; they can be cleared of the slander of inconsistency. A very profound and precise instinct has let them to single out the human household as the chief obstacle to their inhuman progress. Without the family we are helpless before the State, which in our modern case is the Servile State. To use a military metaphor, the family is the only formation in which the charge of the rich can be repulsed. It is a force that forms twos as soldiers form fours; and, in every peasant country, has stood in the square house or the square plot of land as infantry have stood in squares against cavalry. How this force operates this, and why, I will try to explain in the last of these articles. But it is when it is most nearly ridden down by the horsemen of pride and privilege, as in Poland or Ireland, when the battle grows most desperate and the hope most dark, that men begin to understand why that wild oath in its beginnings was flung beyond the bonds of the world; and what would seem as passing as a vision is made permanent as a vow."
It's like they're trying to shift the population in favor of a certain group. Good men, women and patriots are punished for standing or even noticing, instead of kneeling or ignoring.
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more - we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956
@@davidsmart8594 Most people don't know very much about history. It's a survival technique. Zaphods sunglasses. But the danger is still there even if you can't see it. You know a million Ukr**nians, Belar*ssians and Ru**Ian's were subjected to the worst t*RT*re imaginable and the main charge was, using this exact wording ant**emitism
Solzhenitsyn also stated that the state didn't care about guilt or innocence--only whether you were "friendly" to the state & its power. If a criminal helped the state get more power, then that criminal is set free. If a person never even had a chance to commit a crime, such as a monk in a monastery, but challenges the state's power, then he is arrested.
@tooyoungtobeold8756 > It's not just the police, the courts are complicit in two tier justice as well. Yes - they give people organising peaceful protests longer prison sentences than those who carry out violent attacks on the police.
Lay a lot of the blame for this on that vandal Theresa May! Her ridiculous and dangerous policy of Police and Crime Commissioners and the wider policy of city or regional mayors has politicised what was previously a public service that was fiercely and proudly independent of political influence! Couple that with the current corps of incompetent, politically woke and cowardly Chief Constables and the ‘job’ is truly finished!
I believe so. Unfortunately they’ve infiltrated every tier of the establishment and society, so nothing will be done, unless there is kinetic activity (which I’m not promoting).
Here in Scotland it has been always so. I spent nine months in litigation versus Police Scotland (defending myself) fighting eight separate charges and having them thrown into the gutter from where they had come from. They are the biggest gang we have. Crime family members are wearing police brass on their collars and shoulders.
@@barriereid9244 Same here in North Wales, with local police turning a blind eye to drug dealing/distribution , sex offences, assaults against the disabled whilst going after truth telling "hurty words"...
@dogmadogma5398 > Why is not wanting mass migration a hate crime It's not. Whoever told you it is was either lying to you or was incredibly stupid. Either way, you shouldn't listen to them.
All the police want is a conviction,their couldn't give a toss about facts .First you will made to feel comfortable,offered a drink it will be casual chat and will words TWISTED.
You don’t understand… they’ve been purposely filling all positions of importance with people who have the same views politically for a long, long time and they’re manufactured on conveyor belts at the universities. They push and force out the old guard who would disagree with the direction they’re going and promote the new lot over them. They all have the same views, they all believe in “the message”. It’s everything too, education, law, policing, politics, media etc. the entire system is compromised.
Its not bias, thats downplaying the situation. Police are entrusted with special powers and privileges because they are supposed to serve as neutral enforcers of law. When they use that special status to enforce a specific ideology and to abuse certain peoples, they have violated the terms with which they were granted such powers and as such are criminals. When this effort is coordinated, they are a criminal organization.
We should all join the 'Free Speech Union'. We need help and legal protection, and they have both should our rights be violated. Let's make them 'our union'.
Fella got 16 months in Jail today for, get this, "shouting at a police dog" 🤷♂️ I mean that's wrong and all, but 16 months! There are legitimate predators in this country who're convicted over and over again, and yet never see the inside of a jail cell - its unreal.
That's insane...but in such a world we should use their insanity back at them....He should claim that he identifies as a cat, and could not go against his nature. I'm not even joking (much)
@@thefool8224 6 months for child murderers, too. regarding grape i dont believe someone is guilty just because hes convicted though. Not as long as those shield laws or similar sentiments held by judges persist. We know most of the people doing it are actually women, they just arent convicted because its not even if they are legally considered the same thing.
I think the better point here is that people who do this aren't cops. They are criminals. When they revoke your right to speak or petition the government they are no longer your government they are an invading army and need to be treated as such. In the nineteen and twentieth century hundreds of Millions of innocent lives could have been traded for a few dozen if the people viewed this kind of thing as a tripwire for armed local resistance. No one payed attention to the fate of Switzerland or Finland as compared to Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Romania Yugoslavia, etc. Guns and a disciplined working class create peace criminals and bankers create war...
They're well past lawyers. Even in the US ... see j6 protesters who spent 4 years in prison BEFORE conviction... speedy trial... nope... freedom of speech... nope... innocent till PROVEN guilty by a jury of their PEERS.... nope. Resist your oppressors (who have gagged you and said resistance via SPEECH is criminal)... with your natural rights... when they suspend the law it's the law of the jungle.
@@michaelcummins5214 yeah. When the cops are crooks you better arm yourself. The only way to protect yourself and your community is to establish effective deterrence... one tier of the two tier society has succeeded in this regard.
Their violence is justice... Violent revolution is inevitable in such a climate ... which has a 90% chance of making EVERYTHING 100x worse for a generation... but people ALWAYS fight back. So maybe the "government" should do the smart thing AND BACK THE F--K OFF BEFORE THEY BREAK SOMETHING THAT CAN'T EASILY BE FIXED!
A lot of the problem is that the average citizen doesn’t know their rights, and trust that the Police won’t abuse their power over someone who’s ignorant.
They won't try. They know what would happen. Many people would sheepishly give in, but there would also be people who would use the 2nd amendment for what it was written for. Those people would get together and form militias and push back. They wouldn't risk trying, only talk a big game. 😐
@Sage521 Already well underway. You have a few decades at best. If Trump wins, he will delay it a couple years at best- and that's if he actually does something this time. He wasted his last 4 years.
Laws can be changed IF we ever get a patriotic PM. Trouble is our PMs have been bowing to wef, eu, un. Traitors the lot and yes I include Johnson in that as he talked the talk and too many fell for it.
Off topic - reminds me of how during the American Revolutionary War 🇺🇸 US Navy John Paul Jones wanted to kidnap a British dude 🇬🇧 for a prisoner swap & the guy's wife invited the American sailors into her house for tea 🍵 ua-cam.com/video/XngDR7ftHqA/v-deo.html
The reason that the government treats certain communities with kid gloves is because they are scared of their reaction. There is a lesson there if you're willing to learn it.
First the Government came for the elderly, and I did not speak out because I was not elderly. Then they came for the freedom speakers, and I did not speak out because I was not a freedom speaker. Then they came for the patriots, and I did not speak out, because I was not a patriot. Then they came for the veterans, and I did not speak out because I was not a veteran. . Then they came for me. And there was no one left to speak out for me. . In tribute and thanks to Martin Niemöller.
@@Nora......... the one detail of his opinion with which I disagree is the normalizing of "non criminal investigations or offenses". Such things ought not to exist in a free society. Criminality is what free people have agreed crosses the line from merely being immoral to being an intolerable affront against all of the free people in that society.
@@alz.7716 I heard him make that very point. I quote: 'First ask, are you investigating me for a crime, or a non-crime? If they say that they are investigating you for a non-crime, you have the option of closing that door, and telling them to kiss your arse goodbye'.
@@Nora......... He's absolutely right about what you quoted. However, the point needs to be made that investigating citizens for non criminal offenses might be within the (voluntary) purview of the clergy, but the government ought never be empowered to do so. As I understand the matter, the Commonwealth countries have created this class of offenses out of whole cloth.
In China and North Korea, people are encouraged to report on their neighbours or family , to government officials if they hear them saying anti government rhetoric. Children are actively encouraged to report on their parents . This is slowly beginning to happen in the UK
@@Interdiction The huge problem is, whether you like them or not, is that there are far far too many of them, We don't need them, we don't want them, and they are not welcome. Why does Starmer et al think we do?
The snitching on a colleague for saying things that aren’t politically correct is fairly widespread. A friend of mine was asked in an interview for the fire service if he would report a colleague if they said something racist, sexist etc. he said no, and didn’t get the job.
I was a firefighter for 4 years. From 2018-2022. I quit in the end because of covid and the woke nonsense. Literally letting people in who couldnt meet the traditional requirements of being a firefighter because they were black, had a pair of tits, gay or nepotism. Then those people shot up the ladder and were absolutely disgusting to be around. Passive aggressive and would be like little school kids telling tales to the gaffers if someone left a bucket out or hadnt completed their DEI module on the computer. Since i quit, I've never been happier the whole public services are a joke. Seems these days you have to be a nutter to do the job
please invite this guest back!! he's great! more people need to hear from him. He says very important thingds more people need to know and he is knowledgable and speaks well.
@@hrtdinasaurette3020 that’s why I used to love British comedies so much. That dark humor, played so straight. My dad had “BBC America” on cable and it’s all I would watch.
(while being fired upon in an eastern european theatre, to a pal) "'ere, I don't think they like us.." (his response) "nah, they're just f'ing about.."
And the Met officers who dragged the peaceful people out from protests and beat them about the face in full view of the media. Can they be prosecuted? Can examples be made of them?
He's another SHILL sadly. Only reacted when he himself was personally affected, when many thousands have been criminalised for "hurty words" since new liebour came to power in 1997.
The trouble is that it's now obvious that the judicial system is largely captured! There is 2 tier government, policing and judiciary. Equality under the law is now a historic artifact.
Has been for many years, not just since the start of the bug arrival, that some seem to think. Certainly an acceleration since 1997, when Bliars new liebour came in.
As a firearms enthusiast I was shocked by the 'take your weapons back to the mosques lads' story. We have to be so careful with what we do. Some of us have suffered some real injustices down the years from the police. Yet belong to a certain community and just walk around with offensives weapons.....
Britain can no longer afford to have an unwritten,and uncodified constitution - it was only ever as strong as our traditons, and most of those are gone - we need protection from our own government.
While I agree at this point the issue with a written constitution is who would write it. If its today's politicians then its the last thing I'd want, all they would do is lock in the hell we already have.
@@RossMitchellsProfile I agree 🤔 that's the problem. The solution is to win political power, create a constitution which, once implemented, will begin to regenerate the kind of society we want, a bit like a virus 😂 Blair understood this. When he retired, that was the beginning, not the end. We need to do the same, but unlike Blair, we need to lock it in.
That UK police commissioner who talked about transporting US citizens to UK for prosecution over speech? He really needs to have someone arrange his travel: to Nürnburg to the dock to answer charges of crimes against humanity and, if found guilty, a trip up 13 steps and down through a trap door. “Just following orders” is no defense since 1945.
You guys are toast across the pond. That story about the 24/7 recording inside the cop cars was the coffin nail, that's literal Stasi policy, not even hyperbolic.
@stonestreaker Seriously concerned for the Brits. How does anyone get the regime to back off after this? The apparatus just takes on a mind of its own after a point, no one can stop it even if they're of a mind to.
True criminals thrown out of prisons to make space for those that swore and said hurtey things…anger will do that. Using the public as a “Beware this could happen to you too”
Coppers never report other officers if they have witnessed them acting unlawful or using excessive force on the public, if you do your career is over, but if you report a colleague for your personal opinions it’s a career enhancement, the majority of them are back stabbing liars, don’t say anything to them at all remain silent….
Utter bullshit, you have no idea do you. Your ridiculous narrative plays straight into the hands of those who would seek to remove your right to freedom of speech
Great advice from Harry. it is so chilling that we need it in this country. It begs the question why all those thousands of lads fought and died for our freedom?
Imagine having allowed your mind & the way you think about reality to have been so warped, that you are more outraged at WORDS people say, then children being STABBED, GRAPED & MURDERED.
It is so unbelievable. How does this happen? How is this possible? Here in sweden, a woman housed a "visitor" who ended up forcing himself on her very young daughter. And she didn't report him, because she was afraid, he would be deported. How can something like this happen? Some mk ultra hypno brain fring. I will never understand.
I've written down every word regarding what to do should I get 'the knock on the door' - especially as I am as innocent as the day I was born (well, not quite) which will not matter to 'them'. Thank you Harry Miller.
I understand it is not desired, but how are the people going to tackle this without violence ? Your voices are silenced, your right to protest are taken away, what else is there left ?!
For 1000 years, England was known as the land of the free man. Long before even before America was known for that. And now, to hear from an officer himself how absolutely convoluted and dystopian navigating the current aggressive and pernicious policing the UK has, is absolutely harrowing. This is not England, this is a monster.
A tow-tiered, authoritarian, police State. That's what once lovely England has turned into. All the best of the past leaders are now crying in their graves.
"you cant have a situation... where you are afraid to make conversation with your colleague [because there is pressure] to report you for saying anything that is 'off-script" That's pretty much what anyone working or existing in society today has to deal with. Thanks Millennials.
I knew a retired police officer who retired when the police stopped being the police service and started calling themselves the police force. When you Force, you no longer Serve.
I said it to friends months ago that if Labour won things would not get better. I said they would either not change or get worse. Why? Because on the global political scale the Conservatives are left of centre, where Labour were in the 80's and 90's, and Labour are now way further left. The UK public were foolish to think voting Labour to spite the Conservatives for going left would make it any better!
@@goonofhazard2203they absolutely do care, they are just scared. What these hooligans are doing is nothing compared to what must happen in order to fix our many problems. Peaceful surrender has failed, the opposite is now required, appropriate and unequivocally necessary.
Be quiet, do what needs to be done, then be quiet again@@goonofhazard2203 Pick targets wisely. Avoid low hanging fruit. Don't fear apprehension. Embrace 3 hots, a cot, networking and getting educated with new like-minded friends.
I'm against illegal migration.
I voted for Brexit.
I believe in free speech.
I'm not far right, I'm just right!
Totally on the same wave!!
You and millions of us.
Right off to jail
That is what far right means. That's always what it meant. The questioning of the sacred cows that are being artificially pushed in the public zeitgeist.
The real enemy is big finance that controls everything (politicians, judges, police, media, star system, culture, ...) and wants to destroy Christian identity and traditional family because they are the greatest obstacle to full control over people. Muslim immigrants are part of the plan (also to exploit the resulting riots in order to impose a de facto dictatorship). Read GK Chesterton. Some quotes:
The crimes of England, 1916: "The libel law [is] now used, not to crush lies about private life, but to crush truths about public life."
What's wrong with the world, 1910: "In the quarrel earlier alluded to between the energetic Progressive and the obstinate Conservative (or, to talk a tenderer language, between Hudge and Gudge), the state of cross-purposes is at the present moment acute. The Tory says he wants to preserve family life in Cindertown; the Socialist very reasonably points out to him that in Cindertown at present there isn't any family life to preserve. But Hudge, the Socialist, in his turn, is highly vague and mysterious about whether he would preserve the family life if there were any; or whether he will try to restore it where it has disappeared. It is all very confusing. The Tory sometimes talks as if he wanted to tighten the domestic bonds that do not exist; the Socialist as if he wanted to loosen the bonds that do not bind anybody. The question we all want to ask of both of them is the original ideal question, "Do you want to keep the family at all?" If Hudge, the Socialist, does want the family he must be prepared for the natural restraints, distinctions and divisions of labor in the family. He must brace himself up to bear the idea of the woman having a preference for the private house and a man for the public house. He must manage to endure somehow the idea of a woman being womanly, which does not mean soft and yielding, but handy, thrifty, rather hard, and very humorous. He must confront without a quiver the notion of a child who shall be childish, that is, full of energy, but without an idea of independence; fundamentally as eager for authority as for information and butter-scotch. If a man, a woman and a child live together any more in free and sovereign households, these ancient relations will recur; and Hudge must put up with it. He can only avoid it by destroying the family, driving both sexes into sexless hives and hordes, and bringing up all children as the children of the state--like Oliver Twist. But if these stern words must be addressed to Hudge, neither shall Gudge escape a somewhat severe admonition. For the plain truth to be told pretty sharply to the Tory is this, that if he wants the family to remain, if he wants to be strong enough to resist the rending forces of our essentially savage commerce, he must make some very big sacrifices and try to equalize property. The overwhelming mass of the English people at this particular instant are simply too poor to be domestic. They are as domestic as they can manage; they are much more domestic than the governing class; but they cannot get what good there was originally meant to be in this institution, simply because they have not got enough money. The man ought to stand for a certain magnanimity, quite lawfully expressed in throwing money away: but if under given circumstances he can only do it by throwing the week's food away, then he is not magnanimous, but mean. The woman ought to stand for a certain wisdom which is well expressed in valuing things rightly and guarding money sensibly; but how is she to guard money if there is no money to guard? The child ought to look on his mother as a fountain of natural fun and poetry; but how can he unless the fountain, like other fountains, is allowed to play? What chance have any of these ancient arts and functions in a house so hideously topsy-turvy; a house where the woman is out working and the man isn't; and the child is forced by law to think his schoolmaster's requirements more important than his mother's? No, Gudge and his friends in the House of Lords and the Carlton Club must make up their minds on this matter, and that very quickly. If they are content to have England turned into a beehive and an ant-hill, decorated here and there with a few faded butterflies playing at an old game called domesticity in the intervals of the divorce court, then let them have their empire of insects; they will find plenty of Socialists who will give it to them. But if they want a domestic England, they must "shell out," as the phrase goes, to a vastly greater extent than any Radical politician has yet dared to suggest; they must endure burdens much heavier than the Budget and strokes much deadlier than the death duties; for the thing to be done is nothing more nor less than the distribution of the great fortunes and the great estates. We can now only avoid Socialism by a change as vast as Socialism. If we are to save property, we must distribute property, almost as sternly and sweepingly as did the French Revolution. If we are to preserve the family we must revolutionize the nation. ...
The superstition of divorce, 1920: "It is exceedingly characteristic of the dreary decades before the War that the forms of freedom in which they seemed to specialise were suicide and divorce. I am not at the moment pronouncing on the moral problem of either; I am merely noting, as signs of those times, those two true or false counsels of despair; the end of life and the end of love. Other forms of freedom were being increasingly curtailed. Freedom indeed was the one thing that progressives and conservatives alike contemned. Socialists were largely concerned to prevent strikes, by State arbitration; that is, by adding another rich man to give the casting vote between rich and poor. Even in claiming what they called the right to work they tacitly surrendered the right to leave off working. Tories were preaching conscription, not so much to defend the independence of England as to destroy the independence of Englishmen. Liberals, of course, were chiefly interested in eliminating liberty, especially touching beer and betting. It was wicked to fight, and unsafe even to argue; for citing any certain and contemporary fact might land one in a libel action. As all these doors were successfully shut in our faces along the chilly and cheerless corridor of progress (with its glazed tiles) the doors of death and divorce alone stood open, or rather opened wider and wider. ... As we have already seen papers and public men to-day make a vast parade of the necessity of setting the poor man free to get a divorce. Now why are they so mortally anxious that he should be free to get a divorce, and not in the least anxious that he should be free to get anything else? ... The answer is, I regret to say, that this social campaign, in most though by no means all of its most prominent campaigners, relies in this matter on a very smug and pestilent piece of chalk. There are some advocates of democratic divorce who are really advocates of general democratic freedom; but they are the exceptions; I might say, with all respect, that they are the dupes. The omnipresence of the thing in the press and in political society is due to a motive precisely opposite to the motive professed. The modern rulers, who are simply the rich men, are really quite consistent in their attitude to the poor man. It is the same spirit which takes away his children under the pretence of order, which takes away his wife under the pretence of liberty. That which wishes, in the words of the comic song, to break up the happy home, is primarily anxious not to break up the much more unhappy factory. Capitalism, of course, is at war with the family, for the same reason which has led to its being at war with the Trade Union. This indeed is the only sense in which it is true that capitalism is connected with individualism. Capitalism believes in collectivism for itself and individualism for its enemies. It desires its victims to be individuals, or (in other words) to be atoms. For the word atom, in its clearest meaning (which is none too clear) might be translated as "individual." If there be any bond, if there be any brotherhood, if there be any class loyalty or domestic discipline, by which the poor can help the poor, these emancipators will certainly strive to loosen that bond or lift that discipline in the most liberal fashion. If there be such a brotherhood, these individualists will redistribute it in the form of individuals; or in other words smash it to atoms. The masters of modern plutocracy know what they are about. They are making no mistake; they can be cleared of the slander of inconsistency. A very profound and precise instinct has let them to single out the human household as the chief obstacle to their inhuman progress. Without the family we are helpless before the State, which in our modern case is the Servile State. To use a military metaphor, the family is the only formation in which the charge of the rich can be repulsed. It is a force that forms twos as soldiers form fours; and, in every peasant country, has stood in the square house or the square plot of land as infantry have stood in squares against cavalry. How this force operates this, and why, I will try to explain in the last of these articles. But it is when it is most nearly ridden down by the horsemen of pride and privilege, as in Poland or Ireland, when the battle grows most desperate and the hope most dark, that men begin to understand why that wild oath in its beginnings was flung beyond the bonds of the world; and what would seem as passing as a vision is made permanent as a vow."
People are being arrested for having an opinion while violent offenders are walking around free that's a huge problem
That's called anarcho-tyranny.
thats gun control for you
works every time
It's by design
The real problem is, they aren't upsetting Christians.
It's like they're trying to shift the population in favor of a certain group. Good men, women and patriots are punished for standing or even noticing, instead of kneeling or ignoring.
"A communist system can be recognised by the fact that it spares the criminals and criminalises the political opponent" Alexander Solzhenitsyn
We are seeing the 21st Century version of the Tcheka...
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more - we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956
@@davidsmart8594 Most people don't know very much about history. It's a survival technique. Zaphods sunglasses. But the danger is still there even if you can't see it. You know a million Ukr**nians, Belar*ssians and Ru**Ian's were subjected to the worst t*RT*re imaginable and the main charge was, using this exact wording ant**emitism
Solzhenitsyn also stated that the state didn't care about guilt or innocence--only whether you were "friendly" to the state & its power. If a criminal helped the state get more power, then that criminal is set free. If a person never even had a chance to commit a crime, such as a monk in a monastery, but challenges the state's power, then he is arrested.
Hate speech laws are our version of Article 58.
It's not just the police, the courts are complicit in two tier justice as well.
It's all part of the same club, crown courts,crown police , crown DPP.
@tooyoungtobeold8756
> It's not just the police, the courts are complicit in two tier justice as well.
Yes - they give people organising peaceful protests longer prison sentences than those who carry out violent attacks on the police.
Old style coppers would be horrified at today’s woke shambles.
I was and I am !
Likewise@@mikeraven5751
@@mikeraven5751 Aren't you sad that you missed out on dancing at gay pride and the Notting Hill Carnivals? lol. What crazy times we live in.
Lay a lot of the blame for this on that vandal Theresa May! Her ridiculous and dangerous policy of Police and Crime Commissioners and the wider policy of city or regional mayors has politicised what was previously a public service that was fiercely and proudly independent of political influence! Couple that with the current corps of incompetent, politically woke and cowardly Chief Constables and the ‘job’ is truly finished!
This ones a shill though...
Starmer is WEF, and as we approach 2030, they will all begin to act this desperately.
It's scary just how evil he is for serving them.
@@dubiouscaesar3709It is treason
@@dubiouscaesar3709 serving who
I believe so. Unfortunately they’ve infiltrated every tier of the establishment and society, so nothing will be done, unless there is kinetic activity (which I’m not promoting).
@@tomwinterfishing9065clause schwab actually bragged about infiltrating government's
It's no longer a crime to be a criminal - it is now criminal to notice crime.
Thought crime. It is unsafe to speak above a whisper while tyranny persists.
Here in Scotland it has been always so. I spent nine months in litigation versus Police Scotland (defending myself) fighting eight separate charges and having them thrown into the gutter from where they had come from. They are the biggest gang we have. Crime family members are wearing police brass on their collars and shoulders.
@@barriereid9244 Same here in North Wales, with local police turning a blind eye to drug dealing/distribution , sex offences, assaults against the disabled whilst going after truth telling "hurty words"...
@@barriereid9244
Freemasons
@@kathy571Yes.
Starmer is a WEF puppet and a Davos gang member. Two Tier is real .
A Davos Deviant, mindless and brainless puppet of the Parasite Class.
Indeed.
He already held a meeting with over 40 of them from Europe, here.
Him and blair are members of fabian club their motto wolf in sheeps clothing
@@anncolyer-uq2yz
Starmer was in every Trotskyite club that existed at his Uni. He’s way far left of Jeremy Corbyn that’s for sure.
Far worse. Only political uk figure who is a member of the Trilateral Commission.
Why is not wanting mass migration a hate crime
It’s not! Just a dictatorship government say’s so!
Because shut up, pay your taxes and be a victim, is why.
Let me take you back 2087 years to when the Roman attacked Judea...
@dogmadogma5398
> Why is not wanting mass migration a hate crime
It's not.
Whoever told you it is was either lying to you or was incredibly stupid.
Either way, you shouldn't listen to them.
My dad was a police officer. He told me and my siblings from a young age NEVER talk to police. EVER. Your solicitor will do the talking.
All the police want is a conviction,their couldn't give a toss about facts .First you will made to feel comfortable,offered a drink it will be casual chat and will words TWISTED.
So, StasiStarmer has done it has he.? Got the wallopers to be his latter day 'Gestapo' ?
Good on your dad for his good advice.
Not one word.
😮"I don't like being replaced by invaders" = 3+ years in prison
🔒
isnt gun control cool
@@enalb5085the invaders would have them all
I don't like being replaced by invaders. There, I removed your quotes because it's true and I'm not afraid of Kier Starmer.
A free prison cell for you.⛓🧑⛓
The police are not on our side, a sad but true statement
good thing they took the guns right?
Still waiting for you guys to start using yours... ⏳
The mercenary knights the warlord taxed you to pay for weren't on your side either....
T. Raytors.
Rochdale grape 🍇 gangs.
The people who treat everyone differently based on race are calling those who call it out racist.
White people have a right to their own culture and people just like everyone else. To say otherwise is genocide.
That is the commie way
Large size 20 bodies & tiny brains.
1st rule, accuse the enemy of what you are doing.
DARVO
Police should be ashamed of themselves listening to a dictator! Fight back and get your dignity back !!!!
You don’t understand… they’ve been purposely filling all positions of importance with people who have the same views politically for a long, long time and they’re manufactured on conveyor belts at the universities. They push and force out the old guard who would disagree with the direction they’re going and promote the new lot over them. They all have the same views, they all believe in “the message”.
It’s everything too, education, law, policing, politics, media etc. the entire system is compromised.
They love it!
The pay cheque rolls in regardlessly.
like they did during the Miners Strike???
I am genuinely deeply disturbed as to what is happening in the UK.
Simple solution: Immigrate Down Under.
@@sandybottom6623 Simpler solution . No more asylum seekers / Kick out the ones here and only allow in people who we INVITE .
Same thing is happening here in Australia, hate to break it to you. We're just several years behind but give it time.
If they can't enforse the law in a fair manner and without bias then they shouldn't be enforcing the law at all
Its because they arent scared of the English, but they're terrified of other communities; and it'll stay that way until their equation changes.
Its not bias, thats downplaying the situation. Police are entrusted with special powers and privileges because they are supposed to serve as neutral enforcers of law. When they use that special status to enforce a specific ideology and to abuse certain peoples, they have violated the terms with which they were granted such powers and as such are criminals. When this effort is coordinated, they are a criminal organization.
We should all join the 'Free Speech Union'.
We need help and legal protection, and they have both should our rights be violated. Let's make them 'our union'.
Uneven enforcement of the law is tyranny and should be reacted to as such.
They enforce the bs legal system.. in other words they're a political battering ram
Fella got 16 months in Jail today for, get this, "shouting at a police dog" 🤷♂️
I mean that's wrong and all, but 16 months! There are legitimate predators in this country who're convicted over and over again, and yet never see the inside of a jail cell - its unreal.
That's insane...but in such a world we should use their insanity back at them....He should claim that he identifies as a cat, and could not go against his nature. I'm not even joking (much)
6 months for an actual grapist. they let him go after 6 months to free up space in the prisons for people like the one you mentioned
Mental. You can tell Mark Rowley, Yvette Cooper & especially autistic Starmer are mental by looking at them.
Keep the immigrants... deport the police judges and political class presiding over this tyranny.
@@thefool8224 6 months for child murderers, too. regarding grape i dont believe someone is guilty just because hes convicted though. Not as long as those shield laws or similar sentiments held by judges persist. We know most of the people doing it are actually women, they just arent convicted because its not even if they are legally considered the same thing.
Don't talk to the cops, DEMAND your lawyer.
I think the better point here is that people who do this aren't cops. They are criminals. When they revoke your right to speak or petition the government they are no longer your government they are an invading army and need to be treated as such. In the nineteen and twentieth century hundreds of Millions of innocent lives could have been traded for a few dozen if the people viewed this kind of thing as a tripwire for armed local resistance. No one payed attention to the fate of Switzerland or Finland as compared to Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Romania Yugoslavia, etc. Guns and a disciplined working class create peace criminals and bankers create war...
"No comment". [Wait for your legal representation to arrive]
They're well past lawyers. Even in the US ... see j6 protesters who spent 4 years in prison BEFORE conviction... speedy trial... nope... freedom of speech... nope... innocent till PROVEN guilty by a jury of their PEERS.... nope. Resist your oppressors (who have gagged you and said resistance via SPEECH is criminal)... with your natural rights... when they suspend the law it's the law of the jungle.
This is the UK, in the criminal courts unless advocates play the game, they do not climb the ladder.
@@michaelcummins5214 yeah. When the cops are crooks you better arm yourself. The only way to protect yourself and your community is to establish effective deterrence... one tier of the two tier society has succeeded in this regard.
Respect to this ex policeman
100%
Harry Miller is a real national treasure.
Tyranny just walked right in.
@hayleys-w5q No. 1815, banking, aftermath of the battle of waterloo.
So basically speaking the truth is punishable with imprisonment
Truth is a hatecrime.
Yes.
Yes.
"Truth is treason in the empire of lies." -- Ron Paul
1984
The Three Slogans of The Uniparty:
SILENCE IS VIOLENCE
FREEDOM IS DANGER
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH
Also:
SILENCE IS VIOLENCE.
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Their violence is justice...
Violent revolution is inevitable in such a climate ... which has a 90% chance of making EVERYTHING 100x worse for a generation... but people ALWAYS fight back. So maybe the "government" should do the smart thing AND BACK THE F--K OFF BEFORE THEY BREAK SOMETHING THAT CAN'T EASILY BE FIXED!
Don't forget
SODOMY IS FREEDOM
Truth is disinformation
Police the STREETS not the TWEETS
i like that
A lot of the problem is that the average citizen doesn’t know their rights, and trust that the Police won’t abuse their power over someone who’s ignorant.
Hold onto your guns people. Don't let this happen to America.
They won't try. They know what would happen. Many people would sheepishly give in, but there would also be people who would use the 2nd amendment for what it was written for. Those people would get together and form militias and push back. They wouldn't risk trying, only talk a big game. 😐
What fantasy world are you living in? The exact same thing is happening in America.
Your guns can’t stop fifty million third world breeders from replacing you.
Hasn't it been happening there for the last few years? Just because it might not be in your back yard yet doesn't mean it's not been going on.
@Sage521 Already well underway. You have a few decades at best. If Trump wins, he will delay it a couple years at best- and that's if he actually does something this time. He wasted his last 4 years.
I hated the idea of having a leftie lawyer in charge and now he can make new laws to go against the working British people
NO POLITICIANS CAN MAKE/CHANGE LAWS... That's why it's all acts and statutes.. the legal system is not the law..
@@loonaticsrunningtheassylum "Acts and statutes" get this . . . are laws.
The left has never cared if people agree or not. A mistake conservatives make time and again
Laws can be changed IF we ever get a patriotic PM. Trouble is our PMs have been bowing to wef, eu, un. Traitors the lot and yes I include Johnson in that as he talked the talk and too many fell for it.
Yeah and we're letting him do it and getting away with it
The barbarians are at the gates, and we invited them in, offered them tea, and blamed ourselves for any wrongdoings they caused.
and you dont have guns, barely have knives
they have tons of both though
Off topic - reminds me of how during the American Revolutionary War 🇺🇸 US Navy John Paul Jones wanted to kidnap a British dude 🇬🇧 for a prisoner swap & the guy's wife invited the American sailors into her house for tea 🍵 ua-cam.com/video/XngDR7ftHqA/v-deo.html
@@enalb5085there are a lot more guns than people think bud
The reason that the government treats certain communities with kid gloves is because they are scared of their reaction.
There is a lesson there if you're willing to learn it.
The barabarians are behind the gates, bashing your face in under the protection of the castle guards.
"In the UK everything is policed except crime" Mark Steyn
ie. UK is a police state, official.
i really miss mark on G B NEWS i dont watch it now
@@stitchlover633 If you haven't check out Steyn on line - he has a weekly audio show called Clubland Q&A
First the Government came for the elderly, and I did not speak out because I was not elderly.
Then they came for the freedom speakers, and I did not speak out because I was not a freedom speaker.
Then they came for the patriots, and I did not speak out, because I was not a patriot.
Then they came for the veterans, and I did not speak out because I was not a veteran. .
Then they came for me. And there was no one left to speak out for me. .
In tribute and thanks to Martin Niemöller.
Stellios is correct. Britain does not currently have rule of law.
Great having Harry Miller on - I have the utmost respect for him and the sterling work he is doing.
Free Speech Union and Fair Cop - along with Reform UK. . . We will have a movement for them to worry about. X
I thought the same at first, till it became apparent to me that he's just another shill. SHILLs cause carnage as they go through all the motions.
This man is a hero.
He has given excellent advice. Maybe we should help him with his mission. . .
@@Nora......... the one detail of his opinion with which I disagree is the normalizing of "non criminal investigations or offenses". Such things ought not to exist in a free society. Criminality is what free people have agreed crosses the line from merely being immoral to being an intolerable affront against all of the free people in that society.
@@alz.7716 I heard him make that very point. I quote: 'First ask, are you investigating me for a crime, or a non-crime? If they say that they are investigating you for a non-crime, you have the option of closing that door, and telling them to kiss your arse goodbye'.
@@Nora......... He's absolutely right about what you quoted. However, the point needs to be made that investigating citizens for non criminal offenses might be within the (voluntary) purview of the clergy, but the government ought never be empowered to do so. As I understand the matter, the Commonwealth countries have created this class of offenses out of whole cloth.
@@alz.7716 I will bow to your knowledge on this matter. I am researching 'whole cloth' as we speak. Very enlightening. X
Two tier policing should be illegal.
It is.... Little thing like LAW doesn't stop them...
In China and North Korea, people are encouraged to report on their neighbours or family , to government officials if they hear them saying anti government rhetoric. Children are actively encouraged to report on their parents . This is slowly beginning to happen in the UK
soviet russia was the same
Harry Millar was a great guest with a lot of interesting factual truths about the dictatorial society in which we are now living. Well done guys.
Communist Karens in charge..
Yvette Cooper constantly looks like she's taking a ****...!
"cOmMuNiSm..." No. The ideology shifted already back in 1919-1923.
@@Fridaey13txhOktober It's been Communism ever since, stop trying to deflect you dishonest gongfei.
That is misogyny and you will be locked up under the terrorism act 😂
100%spot on.
Kier Starmer speaks like a Clown BUT Acts like a Dictator ‼️
Whenever he speaks I switch off for my sanity.
I am a legal integrated immigrant in UK.
You're very welcome. Nobody minds those who integrate and hold decent values. UK is a very fair and tolerant country.
I bet you had to jump through hoops being legal, the illegals just saunter in 😡
@@kmrk4055 I actually do mind . I do not want any of them here now I no longer trust them
@@Interdiction The huge problem is, whether you like them or not, is that there are far far too many of them, We don't need them, we don't want them, and they are not welcome. Why does Starmer et al think we do?
Well said, respect
This man is awesome. I hope you have him on again.
It's simple : people are persecuted for speaking the truth , while violent criminals roam free to harass the public .
But why?
This is THE question @@richyrichmountain
Cheering for the British patriots!
Love and respect from Texas!
God bless you Texas
Do really think DJT & co can or will fix it all?
It's all very Soviet.
The government never had to spy on you. You and your neighbors and coworkers do that for them.
The car story is a terrifying thought
Yep we are the UKssr
I don't see how any individual who is still a British police officer can be viewed as having a moral compass.
They don't have one
If you only knew! Wow, could I tell you a story ...
@@pedanticlady9126 Tell it. A name like "pedantic lady" should be telling the story already, not fishing for requests for stories.
@MidlifeCrisisJoe
No chance! 😂 It'd take a novel, and I'd probably end up in the pokey... Cheers 👋
They're clinging to thier pensions
Everyone needs to know this information. Worldwide. Thank you ❤
" when government fears the people you have Liberty, when the people fear their government you have tyranny" Thomas Jefferson
The snitching on a colleague for saying things that aren’t politically correct is fairly widespread. A friend of mine was asked in an interview for the fire service if he would report a colleague if they said something racist, sexist etc. he said no, and didn’t get the job.
Friend of mine lost his job as a diesel mechanic because a black coworker accused him of making racist remarks. No proof needed, just the accusation.
@@aceambling7685 it’s a really strange world we live in
It was probably his poor snooker and darts skills that edged him out? 🤔
@@aceambling7685That's probably because they just don't want the hassle of establishing the facts, so take the path of least resistance.
I was a firefighter for 4 years. From 2018-2022. I quit in the end because of covid and the woke nonsense. Literally letting people in who couldnt meet the traditional requirements of being a firefighter because they were black, had a pair of tits, gay or nepotism. Then those people shot up the ladder and were absolutely disgusting to be around. Passive aggressive and would be like little school kids telling tales to the gaffers if someone left a bucket out or hadnt completed their DEI module on the computer. Since i quit, I've never been happier the whole public services are a joke. Seems these days you have to be a nutter to do the job
Harry came out swinging and took no prisoners. Loved him and he gave some great advice.
Harry is one of The Few with the balls to resist the collapse into Far Left tyranny.
Amazing how few brave people there are in a population.
There are quite a few of these 'old school' retired police that I'd happily have run the country.
please invite this guest back!! he's great! more people need to hear from him. He says very important thingds more people need to know and he is knowledgable and speaks well.
EVERYONE needs to see this
"Am I being investigated for a crime, or a non-crime?" What in the George Orwell is a non-crime?!?
"Non-Crime Hate Incident". Someone has has reported you about something you said in person or online.
When it's 'legal but harmful'. Clear as mud?
A traffic violation by example. Probably a distinction akin to misdemeanor vs felony.
Either way the process is the punishment and deterrent.
It's totalitarian bullshit is what it is
Black/gallows humour is a traditional British survival technique and integral to the British character.
I was going to say something very similar ,that’s why the think it has to go .
Gallows was the traditional British survival technique; the humour was born out of it.
@@hrtdinasaurette3020 that’s why I used to love British comedies so much. That dark humor, played so straight. My dad had “BBC America” on cable and it’s all I would watch.
(while being fired upon in an eastern european theatre, to a pal) "'ere, I don't think they like us.."
(his response) "nah, they're just f'ing about.."
Best Advice when the police wants to fit you up for something is answer “No comment” to every question.
Sobering watching the utterly bereft resigned faces on here. These events are collectively affecting your nation's mental and physical health.
This ex officer talks absolute truth
I still find it baffling that police are investigating 'non-criminal' acts is an accepted thing.
Yet don't turn up for break ins
Harry helped me against surrey police. Man's a legend.
And the Met officers who dragged the peaceful people out from protests and beat them about the face in full view of the media. Can they be prosecuted? Can examples be made of them?
The Gulag Archipelago should be mandatory reading in all “free countries “
Agree totes - I read it and if you looked at someone the wrong way that’s was it. Chilling
animal farm and 1984 used to be required reading in british secondary schools
this requirement was quietly dropped a few years ago
sargon covered it.
yes i agree people would soon change their mind about Communism
It is actually horrifying to hear how bad the situation with the police has become!
He thinks the courts will protect the English? Thats funny
It is.
Yeah like the injustice system is there to get the peasants justice
He's another SHILL sadly. Only reacted when he himself was personally affected, when many thousands have been criminalised for "hurty words" since new liebour came to power in 1997.
It is funny, when all they'll likely get is a bent "duty solicitor"...
The English will protect the English . We are millions .
The trouble is that it's now obvious that the judicial system is largely captured!
There is 2 tier government, policing and judiciary. Equality under the law is now a historic artifact.
Has been for many years, not just since the start of the bug arrival, that some seem to think. Certainly an acceleration since 1997, when Bliars new liebour came in.
its a one world government
2 tier police, 2 tier justice system, 2 tier msm, 2 tier gov, I feel depressed.
First war, then famine; pestilence and death.
Leave the country then. It's fully over here. Start making a plan to move out.
It's actually 3 tier.
1 The Police and the Government Establishment
2 Certain favoured groups of people
3 The rest of us
Don't feel depressed feel angry.
@@davidsmith-uo7lj Nah just turn off the tv and stay out of trouble, fnd an outdoor hobby
What a great conversation
The UK is absolutely a police state. Period.
As a firearms enthusiast I was shocked by the 'take your weapons back to the mosques lads' story. We have to be so careful with what we do. Some of us have suffered some real injustices down the years from the police. Yet belong to a certain community and just walk around with offensives weapons.....
Britain can no longer afford to have an unwritten,and uncodified constitution - it was only ever as strong as our traditons, and most of those are gone - we need protection from our own government.
I highly recommend the work of Jefferson, Adams, Madison, et. al. In this regard.
@@PrionicProteins Britain's destiny is philosophical re-unification with America. It's like the Vulcans and the Romulans.
While I agree at this point the issue with a written constitution is who would write it. If its today's politicians then its the last thing I'd want, all they would do is lock in the hell we already have.
@@RossMitchellsProfile I agree 🤔 that's the problem. The solution is to win political power, create a constitution which, once implemented, will begin to regenerate the kind of society we want, a bit like a virus 😂
Blair understood this. When he retired, that was the beginning, not the end. We need to do the same, but unlike Blair, we need to lock it in.
We do have one.
Love this guy. Speaks common sense.honest n truthful.brilliant advise.👍🙏🙏♥️
That UK police commissioner who talked about transporting US citizens to UK for prosecution over speech?
He really needs to have someone arrange his travel: to Nürnburg to the dock to answer charges of crimes against humanity and, if found guilty, a trip up 13 steps and down through a trap door. “Just following orders” is no defense since 1945.
Thank you for your honesty and bravery to speak out x
What amazes me is that informants to the government was what horrified us most about the USSR back in the day.
And the Austrian's Youth...
This is invaluable advice and needs to be shared as far and wide as possible. Also, join the Free Speech Union.
Husband and I joined day Starmer got in. Writing was on the wall.
You guys are toast across the pond. That story about the 24/7 recording inside the cop cars was the coffin nail, that's literal Stasi policy, not even hyperbolic.
The view from outside. It must be like watching a bad film.
@stonestreaker Seriously concerned for the Brits. How does anyone get the regime to back off after this? The apparatus just takes on a mind of its own after a point, no one can stop it even if they're of a mind to.
USA is no better coopers who do not follow law or constitution.
I am a sane leftie who is disgusted at the state of the government
True criminals thrown out of prisons to make space for those that swore and said hurtey things…anger will do that. Using the public as a “Beware this could happen to you too”
You are now -1 generations away from tyranny.
We are already living it !
It's already here.
this was too witty for the other commenters. :D
Coppers never report other officers if they have witnessed them acting unlawful or using excessive force on the public, if you do your career is over, but if you report a colleague for your personal opinions it’s a career enhancement, the majority of them are back stabbing liars, don’t say anything to them at all remain silent….
Unfortunately "no comment" is almost taken as an admission of guilt these days.
Saying "no comment" was meant to protect the innocent.
Utter bullshit, you have no idea do you. Your ridiculous narrative plays straight into the hands of those who would seek to remove your right to freedom of speech
@@Diablo_HimselfIt's still your best option. Lots of videos explain why, if you want to find out more.
Great advice from Harry. it is so chilling that we need it in this country. It begs the question why all those thousands of lads fought and died for our freedom?
Imagine having allowed your mind & the way you think about reality to have been so warped, that you are more outraged at WORDS people say, then children being STABBED, GRAPED & MURDERED.
It is so unbelievable.
How does this happen? How is this possible?
Here in sweden, a woman housed a "visitor" who ended up forcing himself on her very young daughter.
And she didn't report him, because she was afraid, he would be deported.
How can something like this happen?
Some mk ultra hypno brain fring.
I will never understand.
How many of those weapons that they stored in the mosque, will go on to be used in a knife assault? Absolutely pathetic.
Starmer and the police chiefs need holding to task. They are persecuting the british people
Thank you for having this great gentleman on. His sage advice is going to be so helpful for us all.
I've written down every word regarding what to do should I get 'the knock on the door' - especially as I am as innocent as the day I was born (well, not quite) which will not matter to 'them'. Thank you Harry Miller.
I would like to see this chap a lot more in the media.
I understand it is not desired, but how are the people going to tackle this without violence ? Your voices are silenced, your right to protest are taken away, what else is there left ?!
What a great guy standing up for decent policing. 👍 super video
For 1000 years, England was known as the land of the free man. Long before even before America was known for that. And now, to hear from an officer himself how absolutely convoluted and dystopian navigating the current aggressive and pernicious policing the UK has, is absolutely harrowing. This is not England, this is a monster.
A tow-tiered, authoritarian, police State. That's what once lovely England has turned into.
All the best of the past leaders are now crying in their graves.
I don't believe the old politicians would care as they have always been corrupt but the young men who gave their lives will be fuming with rage.
Especially Churchill🥲
"you cant have a situation... where you are afraid to make conversation with your colleague [because there is pressure] to report you for saying anything that is 'off-script" That's pretty much what anyone working or existing in society today has to deal with. Thanks Millennials.
actually, you can thank the feminists' drive for 'political correctness' for this
feminism : the most successful marxist tojan horse ever conceived
I knew a retired police officer who retired when the police stopped being the police service and started calling themselves the police force. When you Force, you no longer Serve.
Harry is just great .He knows what he's talking about and is a fighter .Support Fair Cop.
I said it to friends months ago that if Labour won things would not get better. I said they would either not change or get worse. Why? Because on the global political scale the Conservatives are left of centre, where Labour were in the 80's and 90's, and Labour are now way further left. The UK public were foolish to think voting Labour to spite the Conservatives for going left would make it any better!
DEI = Didn't Earn It.
true
bad advice dont open the doors to pigs and put your camera on straight away.use window to talk to them
Thank you Gentlemen, brilliant discussion!!
What a guy 👏👏 another walking angel . Everyone has to help each other through all this however we can ❤
Revolt!
How? Like those hooligans? Only makes it worse. You'd need a peaceful majority in the streets. Problem is most people don't care.
@@goonofhazard2203they absolutely do care, they are just scared. What these hooligans are doing is nothing compared to what must happen in order to fix our many problems. Peaceful surrender has failed, the opposite is now required, appropriate and unequivocally necessary.
@@rickb06 Good luck playing the game they are best at. Gonna need a bit more creativity than rioting and looting, mate
Be quiet, do what needs to be done, then be quiet again@@goonofhazard2203
Pick targets wisely. Avoid low hanging fruit.
Don't fear apprehension. Embrace 3 hots, a cot, networking and getting educated with new like-minded friends.
@@goonofhazard2203 Nonsense. Submission to tyranny only guarantees more tyranny.
This is exactly what we need.
There is two tier policing and justice
Thanks to this man ❤
This is fantastic! Thankyou so much for this!❤