Deadlock [ DX11 vs Vulkan Comparison ] - RTX 4090 - 1440p Gameplay - Ultra vs Low Graphics Settings

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @iwantum
    @iwantum 2 місяці тому +6

    Let's hope they will optimize the game at full launch, because RTX 4090 and not even stable 300 FPS at low settings is a bit underwhelming for such graphical style.
    People want to utilize their 480 or even 540Hz monitor.

    • @jordan3802
      @jordan3802 2 місяці тому +1

      Nothing to do with the 4090. Its CPU bound.

    • @sublimesupra
      @sublimesupra  2 місяці тому

      Agreed, it's the CPU bottleneck. But in my opinion, a 14700kf should be enough for a solid 300 (at last). Maybe there is margin for improvements.

    • @DBTHEPLUG
      @DBTHEPLUG 27 днів тому +1

      540 hz monitor?
      1 word: grass...

  • @QuackZack
    @QuackZack 2 місяці тому +4

    Seems very similar but the 1% lows on Vulkan seems to be 20-30% better at times. Which I can feel the drops during teamfights, it feels awful. My game was default on DX11 but I'll try Vulkan out now, thanks for the vid!

    • @sublimesupra
      @sublimesupra  2 місяці тому

      Yep, but I've noticed from my vídeos that this 14700KF has a low 1%low (sometimes very disappointing). Is it the same for you?

  • @7448CHRIS
    @7448CHRIS 2 місяці тому +2

    Nice, seems like 1% lows are a bit better on vulkan. Bit less stutter

  • @-1up26
    @-1up26 2 місяці тому +1

    Nice to see, thank you. They seem pretty the same..

    • @sublimesupra
      @sublimesupra  2 місяці тому

      Yeah, like 3% better on vulkan, pretty much the same.

  • @kritikal9437
    @kritikal9437 11 днів тому

    Hey, could you do a 1080p video on this game?

  • @DiavoloDiablo88
    @DiavoloDiablo88 2 місяці тому +2

    If possible can you test the different with AMD products aswell? I also found Vulkan loading map faster than Dx11

    • @sublimesupra
      @sublimesupra  2 місяці тому

      Hello there, first things first, thank you very much for the tip, I really appreciate it.
      Unfortunately not yet, the idea of ​​the channel is show a home PC in action, not on benches like big channels. Maybe in the future when the channel turns self-sustainable I can bring comparisons between Intel and AMD.
      ( also your subscription is very welcome :D )

  • @Decki777
    @Decki777 2 місяці тому +5

    CPU is too weak we should wait for the next gen Intel CPUs and zen 5 3D Vache CPU.

  • @obviouslee1949
    @obviouslee1949 2 місяці тому +1

    Thanks for the comparison. I am just wondering, if you're only using 50% GPU and 20-25% CPU on Low settings, why aren't you getting higher frames ?
    It seems neither component is bottlenecking you.

    • @Bartix520
      @Bartix520 2 місяці тому

      There are other components that can bottleneck. Like ram or disk.

    • @obviouslee1949
      @obviouslee1949 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Bartix520 I thought about RAM but I believe disks today are way ahead to bottleneck during gaming no ?
      Since most people will have an abundance of RAM in terms of amount, are we talking clock speed then ?
      Perhaps he is bottlenecked because game doesn't utilize all his cores ? So it might use Core 1-6 at like 90%+ but not the rest.

    • @Bartix520
      @Bartix520 2 місяці тому

      @@obviouslee1949 Maybe. It's still not final version

    • @sublimesupra
      @sublimesupra  2 місяці тому

      100% sure, it's the 14700kf bottleneck. But that's the point of me making these videos. I don't see many people doing gameplay benchmarking with the 14th i7.
      Also, we need to consider that OBS is taking some CPU, like 5% to 10%.

    • @sublimesupra
      @sublimesupra  2 місяці тому

      ​@@Bartix520 Can't tell yet, maybe is just the game. It's not even a alpha :)