Look at hoods stern low with 15 inch guns if they had of built her as a battleship like kjv she would have heavy deck armour like bismark and would have been harder to sink in fact put missiles on her and along with hms vanguard could be in service today.
@@richhughes7450 Sounds similar to the issue that the American "Indiana" class pre-dreadnought had. It was said that when loaded with the normal load of ammunition, they were so low in the water that their amour belt was below the waterline.
Wonderful shots of HMS Hood. Somewhere on her that day is my father, served on her from March '32 to Jan '34. All the family shared his love of HMS Hood.
One thousand plus went down with her on that fateful day in ,May and three survived and carried on serving in the RN. I’ve seen her ships bell that was recovered and dedicated by Princess Anne in a ceremony in Portsmouth Naval Dockyard, Bismarck also suffered a great loss of life too
The song playing in the intro is called “O Britannia Gem of the Ocean” Known primarily for its rival “O Columbia Gem of the Ocean.” No one living knows for certain which was written first.
"Si vis pacem, Para bellum", is the Royal Navy's motto ("if you wish for peace, prepare for war") Ours was "Nil illigitimis carborundum est" ("Don't let the bastards grind you down....est") a mock Latin aphorism!
@@michaelcoachtechvp2846 erm, you do know that Sheffield is famous for its mass manufacture of crucible steel, which is some of the finest in the world... Also, Hood was made after the British uncovered the Krupp face-hadening technique used on German dreanoughts...
It’s pretty scary on thinking the officers and sailors onboard the ship experienced all this, I can imagine how scary when the ship sunk and plunged into the sea along with the sailors that were trapped inside.. it’s also like the music which is basically why it gives me the chills but maybe it shows how brave all those men where
Худ смог бы на равных противостоять Бисмарку именно благодаря слаженной работе команды и опыта. Но Бисмарк успел первым. Очень жаль моряков обоих кораблей
Thanks for sharing this rare footage of a lendedary ship. The story of the sinking of HMS Hood and of the gallantry of its crews has been retold for generations. However taking Battle Cruiser to fight against Fast Battleship seems fundamentally flawed. Hopefully the US Navy has learned from the hard lessons of RN, as it is overstreched now as RN was then.
The footage at the start is taken from the east side of the entrance to Portsmouth Harbour. The sign PICKFORDS must have been on "The Pickford Sheds." These were stables for the horses working around Old Portsmouth and the Camber (civilian port). Later, the sheds were occupied by small yachts of the Victory Class. Boats of about 21' and weighing about a ton and a half. As far as I know, they are still there.
Queen Elizabeth class, 1920s modernization scheme, could be Warspite, Valiant, Queen Elizabeth or Barham or Malaya, I think all received a version of this modification set in the 1920s. If Warspite, QE, or Valiant, then just a couple of years before getting second modernization and looking quite different for WW2. Then unmistakable Hood from 0:49 to 1:42, Nelson or Rodney at 1:43, I had to look up D52 at 1:56 and cannot get closer to the answer than a V,W, or Thorneycroft modified destroyer leader circa 1918 but can't identity the pennant D52 as such a vessel, then Nelson or Rodney at the end. Gorgeous images. As my Uncle Billy once said, from when Britain HAD a navy.
It is believed by many, that a shell from the Bismarck sank the Hood, but a case can be made, that it was a plunging shell from the cruiser Prince Eugen, that penetrated Hoods deck, and exploded in the Hoods forward magazine. The three crewmen who survived, were in the rear deck, or mid-ship, superstructure!
The first thing that happens in a war is that both sides use the tactics from the previous one. Then the weapons developed in the interim period are used and the tactics then change. In WW1 the sea battles were fought closer as such the assumption was that the shells would come through the sides of the ship so they were armoured. In WW2 you fought further away so the shells were lobbed and came through the deck. Hood was a WW1 ship with a wooden deck. In her first battle and only battle of WW2 Hood lasted 10 minutes.
Don't presume to talk about things you clearly know NOTHING about. "Wooden deck" indeed. What the deck planking was made of is IRRELEVANT to the situation and the ship's protection scheme.
The battleships of the interwar period turned out to be irrelevancies. Mostly they were dive bomber and torpedo plane fodder -- on all sides. For the US, the were relegated to shore bombardment duties and antiaircraft screening for carrier task forces.
@@peterasp1968 Warspite. All the R class were stationed in the Med in 1933, with QE as the flag. Warspite, Valiant and Malaya were with the Home / Atlantic fleet, Barham in extended refit. W, V & M all very similar prior to the major "Queen Anne mansion" refit, but if you look closely at the gun covers in the opening shot, you can see they have Warspite's original woodpecker logo, rather than Valiant's cockerel or Malaya's tiger.
Watching a doomed ship is very odd knowing that some of the crew there were on the ship bound for the eternal deep 🏴 sailors who didn’t come home from the sea 💔
It's a lovely film, but unfortunately it belies the fact that HMS Hood was outdated and her armour scheme would not be able to defeat 15 inch shells at long range. Her loss was tragic and in some sense foreseeable.
Likely no armor deck would’ve survived that. If that shell can haul ass through 2 1in decks, a 2in bomb deck, then through a 3in main deck, it’s likely punching straight through an Iowas 2in bomb deck and 6in armor deck(their deck was only 4.75in of actual armor plate. the rest was STS steel laminated on top). The only difference probably being that the shell goes off before reaching the powder because Iowa’s armored deck is a deck higher and powder rooms are a deck lower than Hood.
@@hazael6769 R-class only had four casemates on each side, this has six: she is a QE class, prior to the major "Queen Anne mansion" refit. Also the Rs only ever had a single funnel, whereas the re-trunking of two funnels can clearly be seen. In 1933, all the R class were stationed in the Med, with QE as the flag. Barham was in refit, so this is either Warspite, Valiant or Malaya, which were with the Home / Atlantic fleet. If you look closely at the gun covers in the opening shot, you can see they have Warspite's original woodpecker logo, rather than Valiant's cockerel or Malaya's tiger. So Warspite, she is.
I believe i am one of the last Royal Navy Veterans to have been on a WWII battleship to fire a full broadside of 9 16inch guns ! This was on the Iowa in the Baltic in 1985. I stood just behind the bridge next to the Vulcañ Flanix. It was the only time the Yanks impressed me, i have photos and was given an Iowa cap !!
To win a fight, 1st you need to find the enemy. The cruiser HMS Norfolk and cruiser HMS Suffolk found the Bismark and Prince Eugen. ----- 2nd, you need to fix the enemy. The battlecruiser HMS Hood and Battleship HMS Prince of Wales fixed both the Bismark and Prince of Wales on equal terms (not a job for lesser ships). Prince Eugen was forced by HMS Hood and HMS Prince of Wales (and no other ships) to abandon the mission to escort Bismark. ---- 3rd, you need to destroy the enemy. The list of Royal Navy ships that aided in the destruction of Bismark is longer than I can recall. Even though Bismark sank HMS Hood and disabled a touret and the bridge on the HMS Prince of Wales, all Bismark and Prince Eugen could do thereafter was run for their lives. Due to beating it endured from HMS Prince of Wales, the Bismark had to reduce speed. ---- H.M.S. Hood went down fighting, and in the process completed her mission (that is, to stop the Bismark and Prince Eugen from breaking out into the Atlantic Ocean to sink cargo ships).
Possibly quite similar - Hood badly damaged and forced to drop out of line, as was already happening. PoW with a similar story. However, it's what happens afterwards, with Hood still afloat, but with debilitating damage, that's the most fascinating "what if".
HMS Hood was a much older ship by WWII and technology even in the short time between her commissioning to the war had moved on massively. Bismarck was far newer and had the benefits and advantages of that technology. Who knows but the advantage would have been with Bismarck.
Yes, because the Hood was built in the WW1 era, she actually had a steam whistle for her horn- unlike what you would expect from say, the Bismarck or Prinz Eugen. She had the same type of horn/whistel a steam engine would have had, just far bigger
There has been much of a debate in what actually sank the Hood. The ship was built in the same yard as the Titanic . The practice then was rivets and welding. The metal used was not pure and had weaknesses in extreme cold weather. It was said that the Hood would actually bend one foot from end to end in a tight turn. I think the explosion in the main magazine during the turn, split the ship in two. Couple that with the stress on the hull with metal fatigue, it sank rather quickly taking most of the crew. Only three survived by a miracle. The explosion was so violent that one of the rear turrets blew completely off the rear deck several hundred feet in the air as witnessed by the Prince of Wales. Hood was a beautiful ship that was obsolete in this time period
Your comment is full of mistruths. Titanic was built by Harland and Wolff. Hood by John Brown. Not only seperate companies but in different countries. The steel was high quality. The poor quality is just a myth.
Hood was old yes, Obsolete possibly debatable she was supposed to go for a deck refit I'm petty sure because the Royal Navy was very well aware of the deck being weak to plunging fire.
@@paulmicelli5819 So was HMS Warspite (a ship that was 7 years older the Hood) and which had survived everything the the German & Italian navies and air forces could throw at her through TWO world wars, as well as landing one of the longest ranged naval gunnery hits in history as well, also obsolete? Don't mistake a million to one hit on her as meaning she was obsolete. Was Bismarck also obsolete because in all the air attacks made against her she did not shoot a single aircraft down? or in her final battle her "uber" fully working gunnery systems failed to land a single hit on the 4 enemy ships surrounding her?
We could do this if we wanted to we have around $700 billion dollars of US debt owned by the UK government. 3rd Highest holder of American debt. And they stay that we have no money.
That's 1930s British propaganda for you. Everything is beautiful with the world thanks to the civilizing influence of the British Empire, guarded by the most powerful force of destruction ever commanded by humanity: the Royal Navy. And then you have the Chinese Civil War, the Manchukuo War, the Chaco War, the Soviet 'Great Terror', the Nazi Revolution, the Italo-Abyssinian War, the Sino-Japanese War, &c.
Such a beautiful ship god bless all who sailed on her RIP
All drowned... on May 24, 1941... amen!
The freeboard on Hood, compared to Nelson/Rodney is crazy. No wonder she had the reputation as "the biggest submarine in the Royal Navy".
Look at hoods stern low with 15 inch guns if they had of built her as a battleship like kjv she would have heavy deck armour like bismark and would have been harder to sink in fact put missiles on her and along with hms vanguard could be in service today.
She got heavier is prob why. They bolted on allot more armour to make her almost a battleship.
@@richhughes7450 Sounds similar to the issue that the American "Indiana" class pre-dreadnought had. It was said that when loaded with the normal load of ammunition, they were so low in the water that their amour belt was below the waterline.
My father-in-law, who served as a gunner on the Hood told me in rough weather she " ran gunwales under" 😉
Not much difference in their freeboard. Looks similar to other battleships.
Wonderful shots of HMS Hood. Somewhere on her that day is my father, served on her from March '32 to Jan '34. All the family shared his love of HMS Hood.
That is SO cool.
and still mighty
Hood was all class
Hope you or some of you got grandchildren to appreciate that tidbit of history.
HMS Hood was such an elegant ship.
awkward: long, low-grade, towers - like mushrooms on a stump... but what a grace in movement. it is breathtaking to realize this power.
One thousand plus went down with her on that fateful day in ,May and three survived and carried on serving in the RN. I’ve seen her ships bell that was recovered and dedicated by Princess Anne in a ceremony in Portsmouth Naval Dockyard, Bismarck also suffered a great loss of life too
If you let time stand still, its ferocity is stunning.
I have never seen this film before
Thank you
Uncle Colin was Captain engineer of HMS Hood her fate and date are deeply ingrained in the family's memory....May 24th 1941
Just thinking of all those lost souls but they went to heaven defending their country
Beautiful ships👍
That was wonderful Thankyou.
Fantastic footage!
Beautiful
Three of the Royal Navy's most legendary ships. Warspite, Hood and Nelson (or Rodney, I'm not quite sure)
I think Rodney had the better War.
Prince of Wales.
@@easterworshipper730 He is taking about 1930s there wasn't any KGV class battleship in 30s
Renown was more effective than Hood as a Battlecruiser.
I think she looked beautiful, very emotional. Great filming, bless all those sailors.
indescribable delight! I'm ready to follow you like a seagull...
More footage of Nelson/Rodney!
Can we appreciate how humongous and smooth flowinb Hood was compared to the other 2 ? like she dwarf battleship that were not tiny at all
The song playing in the intro is called “O Britannia Gem of the Ocean”
Known primarily for its rival “O Columbia Gem of the Ocean.”
No one living knows for certain which was written first.
Looks like Warspite at the start, then Hood (God bless her) then Nelson or Rodney.
Maybe. Couldn't decide if the lead ship was a Q.E. class or a Revenge class.
It's a Q.E. class.
In those days Britannia ruled the waves. HMS Hood suffered such a tragic end.
Ready Aye Ready is the motto of.. The Royal Canadian Navy ( or it was when they had one) and the British Sea Cadet Force.
"Si vis pacem, Para bellum", is the Royal Navy's motto ("if you wish for peace, prepare for war")
Ours was "Nil illigitimis carborundum est" ("Don't let the bastards grind you down....est") a mock Latin aphorism!
And originally - the clan Johnston from Scotland.
1:26 Hoods whistle
thats the vessel the camera is on
The Hood is such a beautiful ship. Lasted two minutes in actual combat.
Watch Drachinifel's analysis of what happened.
Beautiful and unlucky.
@@OntologicalQuandry I have seen that. Very insightful and sad.
She saw combat before she was sunk by Bismarck you know
Cheap steel also a trait of the English and not enough of it.
@@michaelcoachtechvp2846 erm, you do know that Sheffield is famous for its mass manufacture of crucible steel, which is some of the finest in the world... Also, Hood was made after the British uncovered the Krupp face-hadening technique used on German dreanoughts...
It’s pretty scary on thinking the officers and sailors onboard the ship experienced all this, I can imagine how scary when the ship sunk and plunged into the sea along with the sailors that were trapped inside.. it’s also like the music which is basically why it gives me the chills but maybe it shows how brave all those men where
Худ смог бы на равных противостоять Бисмарку именно благодаря слаженной работе команды и опыта. Но Бисмарк успел первым. Очень жаль моряков обоих кораблей
Excellent vid!
Great film of a great ship at the time Great Britain was still great!
So sad her demise! 😞🙏🏽✝️
Thanks for sharing this rare footage of a lendedary ship. The story of the sinking of HMS Hood and of the gallantry of its crews has been retold for generations. However taking Battle Cruiser to fight against Fast Battleship seems fundamentally flawed. Hopefully the US Navy has learned from the hard lessons of RN, as it is overstreched now as RN was then.
The song at the start is called: Britannia pride of the ocean/ Three cheers for the red, white and blue
The footage at the start is taken from the east side of the entrance to Portsmouth Harbour. The sign PICKFORDS must have been on "The Pickford Sheds." These were stables for the horses working around Old Portsmouth and the Camber (civilian port).
Later, the sheds were occupied by small yachts of the Victory Class. Boats of about 21' and weighing about a ton and a half. As far as I know, they are still there.
Yes still there, now named 'Quebec House'.
Queen Elizabeth class, 1920s modernization scheme, could be Warspite, Valiant, Queen Elizabeth or Barham or Malaya, I think all received a version of this modification set in the 1920s. If Warspite, QE, or Valiant, then just a couple of years before getting second modernization and looking quite different for WW2. Then unmistakable Hood from 0:49 to 1:42, Nelson or Rodney at 1:43, I had to look up D52 at 1:56 and cannot get closer to the answer than a V,W, or Thorneycroft modified destroyer leader circa 1918 but can't identity the pennant D52 as such a vessel, then Nelson or Rodney at the end. Gorgeous images. As my Uncle Billy once said, from when Britain HAD a navy.
Could the '5' be a '6' making it HMS Wild Swan? The film may have been digitally 'remastered'.
Good old times... 😊
Недолго музыка играла.
Недолго фраер танцевал.
is that HMS HOOD!?
It is believed by many, that a shell from the Bismarck sank the Hood, but a case can be made, that it was a plunging shell from the cruiser Prince Eugen, that penetrated Hoods deck, and exploded in the Hoods forward magazine. The three crewmen who survived, were in the rear deck, or mid-ship, superstructure!
Doesnt matter. Its on the bottom.
Very, very sad. Retrieving the ship's bell was significant.
Battlecruiser missed out on WW1 my great uncle was serving on that, arrived later after time off, sailed without him, sunk some time later
The first thing that happens in a war is that both sides use the tactics from the previous one. Then the weapons developed in the interim period are used and the tactics then change. In WW1 the sea battles were fought closer as such the assumption was that the shells would come through the sides of the ship so they were armoured. In WW2 you fought further away so the shells were lobbed and came through the deck. Hood was a WW1 ship with a wooden deck. In her first battle and only battle of WW2 Hood lasted 10 minutes.
Don't presume to talk about things you clearly know NOTHING about.
"Wooden deck" indeed. What the deck planking was made of is IRRELEVANT to the situation and the ship's protection scheme.
HMS Hood prepares for war.
Actually its not.the hms hood shown in the video was pre 1935 refit as you can see the secondary batteries on its sides
@@yuigahama3189 Good eye! Yes! Remember, this was circa 1933. So makes sense before 1935.
The battleships of the interwar period turned out to be irrelevancies. Mostly they were dive bomber and torpedo plane fodder -- on all sides. For the US, the were relegated to shore bombardment duties and antiaircraft screening for carrier task forces.
Which of the Queen Elizabeth class battleships is preceding the Hood?
It was a Royal Sovereign class not a QE.
@@peterasp1968 Warspite. All the R class were stationed in the Med in 1933, with QE as the flag. Warspite, Valiant and Malaya were with the Home / Atlantic fleet, Barham in extended refit. W, V & M all very similar prior to the major "Queen Anne mansion" refit, but if you look closely at the gun covers in the opening shot, you can see they have Warspite's original woodpecker logo, rather than Valiant's cockerel or Malaya's tiger.
@@dominicbuckley8309 Remarkable powers of observations
@@peterasp1968 Ah, the power of the life-long nerd!!!
@@dominicbuckley8309 Thank you!
Watching a doomed ship is very odd knowing that some of the crew there were on the ship bound for the eternal deep 🏴 sailors who didn’t come home from the sea 💔
What a monster
It's a lovely film, but unfortunately it belies the fact that HMS Hood was outdated and her armour scheme would not be able to defeat 15 inch shells at long range. Her loss was tragic and in some sense foreseeable.
Likely no armor deck would’ve survived that. If that shell can haul ass through 2 1in decks, a 2in bomb deck, then through a 3in main deck, it’s likely punching straight through an Iowas 2in bomb deck and 6in armor deck(their deck was only 4.75in of actual armor plate. the rest was STS steel laminated on top). The only difference probably being that the shell goes off before reaching the powder because Iowa’s armored deck is a deck higher and powder rooms are a deck lower than Hood.
Былая слава и мощь. Приятно было посмотреть
Does anyone know what the name of the first ship?
i think that she HMS malaya but i am not sure
Queen Elizabeth?
@@dkneuer No, it is a Revenge Class, noted by the casemate mounts in the side of the hull
@@hazael6769 R-class only had four casemates on each side, this has six: she is a QE class, prior to the major "Queen Anne mansion" refit. Also the Rs only ever had a single funnel, whereas the re-trunking of two funnels can clearly be seen. In 1933, all the R class were stationed in the Med, with QE as the flag. Barham was in refit, so this is either Warspite, Valiant or Malaya, which were with the Home / Atlantic fleet. If you look closely at the gun covers in the opening shot, you can see they have Warspite's original woodpecker logo, rather than Valiant's cockerel or Malaya's tiger. So Warspite, she is.
I believe i am one of the last Royal Navy Veterans to have been on a WWII battleship to fire a full broadside of 9 16inch guns ! This was on the Iowa in the Baltic in 1985. I stood just behind the bridge next to the Vulcañ Flanix. It was the only time the Yanks impressed me, i have photos and was given an Iowa cap !!
The grand old Lady Warspite !
01:45 Auld Lang Syne
To win a fight, 1st you need to find the enemy. The cruiser HMS Norfolk and cruiser HMS Suffolk found the Bismark and Prince Eugen.
-----
2nd, you need to fix the enemy. The battlecruiser HMS Hood and Battleship HMS Prince of Wales fixed both the Bismark and Prince of Wales on equal terms (not a job for lesser ships). Prince Eugen was forced by HMS Hood and HMS Prince of Wales (and no other ships) to abandon the mission to escort Bismark.
----
3rd, you need to destroy the enemy. The list of Royal Navy ships that aided in the destruction of Bismark is longer than I can recall.
Even though Bismark sank HMS Hood and disabled a touret and the bridge on the HMS Prince of Wales, all Bismark and Prince Eugen could do thereafter was run for their lives. Due to beating it endured from HMS Prince of Wales, the Bismark had to reduce speed.
----
H.M.S. Hood went down fighting, and in the process completed her mission (that is, to stop the Bismark and Prince Eugen from breaking out into the Atlantic Ocean to sink cargo ships).
What is the term freeboard mean?
What a country we once were! And then the politicians took over.😡
1:48 a one of famous big seven
One lucky hit (for the Germans) and boom. Makes you wonder how that battle with Bismarc would have progressed has that fatal hit never occurred.
Possibly quite similar - Hood badly damaged and forced to drop out of line, as was already happening. PoW with a similar story.
However, it's what happens afterwards, with Hood still afloat, but with debilitating damage, that's the most fascinating "what if".
HMS Hood was a much older ship by WWII and technology even in the short time between her commissioning to the war had moved on massively. Bismarck was far newer and had the benefits and advantages of that technology. Who knows but the advantage would have been with Bismarck.
That is HMS Bulwark not the Hood.
Is it a real sound?
Yes, because the Hood was built in the WW1 era, she actually had a steam whistle for her horn- unlike what you would expect from say, the Bismarck or Prinz Eugen. She had the same type of horn/whistel a steam engine would have had, just far bigger
Well fair enough because Hood's keel was laid down in 1916 but wasn't finished until 1920.
Правь Британия морями ….✋✋✋….
Is the Sound AI imbedded or original?
How we loved these ships when we were children. Now is rather silly.
This headline would hit a lot differently if shown 20 years later.
0:57 the mighty Hood
The Hood is the 2nd Ship
There has been much of a debate in what actually sank the Hood. The ship was built in the same yard as the Titanic . The practice then was rivets and welding. The metal used was not pure and had weaknesses in extreme cold weather. It was said that the Hood would actually bend one foot from end to end in a tight turn. I think the explosion in the main magazine during the turn, split the ship in two. Couple that with the stress on the hull with metal fatigue, it sank rather quickly taking most of the crew. Only three survived by a miracle.
The explosion was so violent that one of the rear turrets blew completely off the rear deck several hundred feet in the air as witnessed by the Prince of Wales.
Hood was a beautiful ship that was obsolete in this time period
Your comment is full of mistruths.
Titanic was built by Harland and Wolff.
Hood by John Brown.
Not only seperate companies but in different countries.
The steel was high quality. The poor quality is just a myth.
Hood was old yes, Obsolete possibly debatable she was supposed to go for a deck refit I'm petty sure because the Royal Navy was very well aware of the deck being weak to plunging fire.
Классно его Бисмарк потопил. Жаль,и тому не повезло. А вообще,любой такой Корабль - тюрьма для Команды. Это Вам не Лодка.
It was obsolete by the time of WW2, Bismark proved that fact. RIP to the crews, both never survived.
So 13in belt armour and 8 x 15 guns don't cut the mustard for you in a WW2 battleship?
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 It was built for WW1, it was OBSOLETE by the time of WW2. The Bismarck proved that!
@@paulmicelli5819 So was HMS Warspite (a ship that was 7 years older the Hood) and which had survived everything the the German & Italian navies and air forces could throw at her through TWO world wars, as well as landing one of the longest ranged naval gunnery hits in history as well, also obsolete?
Don't mistake a million to one hit on her as meaning she was obsolete. Was Bismarck also obsolete because in all the air attacks made against her she did not shoot a single aircraft down? or in her final battle her "uber" fully working gunnery systems failed to land a single hit on the 4 enemy ships surrounding her?
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 I will pray for you.
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Read a History book.
The British Navy! The main reason Germany didn't try to invade Britain
Is this portsmouth ' i thought so ' that blue & white building is still there ' its some rich dudes house now ✌️🇬🇧🏴
Hood was sunk by Bismark in WWII
Battle crusiers and battle ships do not mix well.
Horayyy🎉🎉🎉
We could do this if we wanted to we have around $700 billion dollars of US debt owned by the UK government. 3rd Highest holder of American debt. And they stay that we have no money.
Bismark vaporized hood. Thats war
1933, back when the UK was worth fighting for.
It still is.
@@ianhudson7350 The war is already lost. Betrayed by our leaders.
The British are worth fighting for
How low has Britain fallen as a nation since then.
Your only as low as YOU feel…..
Not sure the 3.5 million unemployed at the time would agree
wow that before the ww2 wow I think the 30s was so beautiful days no hate or wars
That's 1930s British propaganda for you. Everything is beautiful with the world thanks to the civilizing influence of the British Empire, guarded by the most powerful force of destruction ever commanded by humanity: the Royal Navy. And then you have the Chinese Civil War, the Manchukuo War, the Chaco War, the Soviet 'Great Terror', the Nazi Revolution, the Italo-Abyssinian War, the Sino-Japanese War, &c.
Well said! Don't forget the Spanish Civil War@@williamdiffin28
Курица провинциальная. На морде написано😅
Obsolete junk
Привет от Бисмарка
Худ...это не тот линкор котоый был потоплен Бисмарком ?