Mancity’s BUILD UP PLAY | Tactical Analysis | Pep Guardiola
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
- Man city’s BUILD UP | Tactical Analysis | Pep Guardiola Eng.Version
Versión de Español
• Salida de Manchester C...
English Version
• Mancity’s BUILD UP PLA...
한국어 버젼
• 맨시티 변칙빌드업 원리| 축구분석 | 펩...
INSTAGRAM: GEDFOOTBALL
GED
Performance Analyst
Football Coach
Kevin MacLeod의 Bicycle - Reunited은(는) Creative Commons Attribution 라이선스(creativecommon... 따라 라이선스가 부여됩니다.
출처: incompetech.com...
아티스트: incompetech.com/
It is important to say that, even though City changes its approach to each game, their main principles on how to play the ball remain untouched. The secret behind that kind of philosophy is to train a lot those key elements during the year and the specificities of each opponent during the game week
Great analysis! Would never have seen the game this way.
Te echábamos de menos, Gran trabajo!!
Welcome Back.
Damn Pep is something else. Always prepared
We were waiting for this!
Each player has a job!!! Beautiful
Gr8 vid.
nice soundtrack too.
This is amazing to watch..
Good presentation 👍
항상 감사합니다
Great video! You noticed things I had never seen. Thanks ⚽️🧠
Gwiz so theres this new catchphrase going around about "colourism' and of course its rebranded old news, but even so, lets press this using the case of lil kim. If we do we might conclude the victims of colourism indulge in the same victimhood politics as the LGBT brigade 💪🏻
Lil Kim for example "confessed" that she started bleaching because black men did not want her and openly expressed their preference for lighter skinned women. Leaving aside female sexual selection pressure and its inherent unquestioned entitlements, what is she really saying? 🤔
Keeping in mind that the highest power is that which can say "no" she is essentially saying she had less objects upon which to exert her power. She had a smaller pool of men to reject. She had less men to lead on, manipulate, insult, confuse, deceive and belittle. She ultimately willed to be in a better pisition to assume and practice her prerogative ; her female duty to degrade and deny men, and yet, it is woman who need protecting 🙈
If we cease femsplaining and turn to mansplaining we unearth a series of unique or additional insights, for example, the idea that colourism isnt racial but corporate. Men arent as bothered by "colourism" as its just another brand of the many ways in which we are called igly eveeyday. Women however take exception as it undermines their pretences to being gods. For a man to be able to say "no" to them means they cease being women; whilst he becomes one.
We as a people have problems all across the board so why would women focus exclusively on this particular aspect of our sickness whilst ignoring and neglecting others. Its as if they treat our pathologies as they do men. If we do dissimilar and see it as an issue of branding we can suggest that the issue is with who gets to define worth, and what trend will be in vogue. Theyre upset that their dashion is out of style but want everyone to buy into their branding.
But lets pretend this logic isnt true and presume this claim of colourism has some merit. Let's jump ahead to a future place where darker skinned women are celebrated and cherished, and call it nigtopia. In nigtopia our people still have no control over their education, housing, mass communication, employment, means of production, continent or global image, but the darker skinned women feel real good. Im curious; what problem will this solve? 😐
It brings me back to apartheid azania where the white elite classified the japanese - or was it the chinese - as honorary whites. Under no circumstances would it have made sense to bicker amongst themselves about their designations, unless they were in collusion with the existing antiblack power equation , which most these anti "colourism" claimants are. They arent seeking liberation, but containment. They want to be oppressed peacefully
If these people were deeply upset ablut colourism it is unlikely they would be the same ones to mock african features such as complexion and hair and yet they're often the very ones referencing hair as picky, niggerish and nappy, whilst claiming mixed/diluted heritage as pretty or good hair. How can people claim to be against the source of their values and the system defining how they see the world? They arent; they want to refine the system not eradicate it because they remain invested and are the reason it perpetuates.
Language, Neely Fuller and other long explained, structures how we see the world. It is as if what we see is ordered by what we think, which is determined by the tools used and programming our thinking. If however we fail to challenge concepts of "fairness" that essentially equate whiteness with purity and right, it is a battle lost prior to a pistol being fired. We cannot think like them and still profess/pretend to be against then. It doesnt make sense.
+447939642873
Omalone11@gmail.com
Insane insight
Great analysis!! Thank you
Thank you so much bro!
Very good analysis good job
Thank you so much!
Perfect Analysis
?
Thank you so much bro!
Since when Silva was No 8 and Sané No 11??
This non entity style of “football” is approaching its end. Teams are understanding and countering it. The art of football is to move the ball forwards as quickly and as effectively as possible and all this sideways backwards boring football is awful to watch
He won the treble with this boring football btw
amazing
Question, what if midfielder dont take right position?
Wow great
Great job
1:13
Why roma vs napoli also there ?
Nice good
Wanna play Triple Triad?
이게 꿈인가 싶다.. Welcome back..
앵?
Dalnuurshe
Jo
Booooooring