Albert Schweitzer (2009) | Full Movie | Jeroen Krabbe | Judith Godreche | Samuel West
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
- For generations the name Albert Schweitzer has been synonymous with hands-on compassion and the power of Christ-like sacrifice. Now director Gavin Miller presents a landmark drama about the legendary Christian medical missionary.
Director: Gavin Millar
Starring: Jeroen Krabbe, Judith Godreche, Samuel West, Barbara Hershey, Jonathan Firth
Merci beaucoup pour ce film magnifique que je ne connaissais pas du tout. Je salue le courage de ce grand médecin qui n'a pas hésité à se rendre au Gabon plus particulièrement à Lambaréné pour se mettre à aider les autres notamment les noirs. Comme quoi on peut ne pas être de la même religion mais on peut faire preuve de dévouement envers les autres quelle que soit la couleur de peau. Il ne faut pas oublier qu'il était protestant et qu'il a eu le prix Nobel de la paix en 1952. Bravo docteur Schweitzer.
To be alive is to be apart from Christ in Heaven. Death is swallowed up in Christ's resurrection. As Christian's we should not be afraid of death. Love not the world, nor anything in it. Love God, love God's will, and love mankind by demonstrating God's grace, showing the way to Christ by living a Christian Life. We believe good will overcome any and all evil by the sovereign power and love of God.
I don't mind ads in general. But every 8-10 minutes is a little over the top.
At least it is limited t 1 at a time. But still .....
Other than that ..... thanks for this plead. I never saw this movie before. And I so admired AS and read his autobiography many, many years ago.
Correction: I am less than 1 hour into the movie and I just watched ad no. 10!
I remember my mother telling me that albert was my grandfather, turns out to be true
How cool is that?!😊
He is the reason why i entered the medical profession 💗💗💗🙏🙏🙏
He looked a vigorous man!
Y reconoció a tu mamá?
Lucky you
Be like your grandfather
My definition of good acting : Questions . All through the movie my head is buzzing . How would I react to that ? What would I have said to answer that ? Why did he do that ?
Amazing film wow 🙏🏽🏆
Je découvre, 10 ans après sa création, ce petit bijou d’humour et d’autodérision, à l’image de sa créatrice. J’adore !
존경합니다
It’s a hard breaking.
Men chosen by him.
Hay quá bạn ơi❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
El Gran Hombre del Siglo XX
Does anyone know which piece of Bach was played at Minute 07:35
BWV 538 "Dorian"
It’s performed by Karl Richter at the Abbey of Ottobeuren, on an album released in the 1950s. Side B of the album is a recording of Bach’s Chorale Partita on “Sei gegrusset, Jesu gutig.”
👍👍👍
Damn, the time, money, and effort that went into this movie is evident. However, as far as generating interest in how amazing a human being Albert Schweitzer was is incredibly lacking. It checks all of the boxes as far as who the man was and the difficulties he had to face, but this movie doesn't make it interesting. It's almost like this movie was made with the intention to make it a failure. Why? That sucks so hard.
I think you didn't watch it all, and get the true message of it
Typical Vision Video - with there utter contempt for Biblical discernment and separation from lies, heresies, heretics, false teaching and false teachers.
Albert Schweitzer:
“He had tremendous influence on theology, but he certainly did not maintain orthodox Christian theology. He concluded that book with Jesus having brought about His own crucifixion; he also left Christ without a resurrection. Schweitzer’s position was that Jesus held the idea that He was the Messiah, that He had a “messianic consciousness” and that He thought He could bring about the end of the world by forcing His own death; that, according to Schweitzer, was His glory. Jesus died as a martyr to His belief in His “messianic character.”
Just before Schweitzer’s death, he joined the International Unitarian Association, making it perfectly plain that he did not believe in Jesus’ deity. This is a great tragedy; but it shows that a person can be a humanitarian without necessarily being a Christian. Many people have been concerned with human need, even though they themselves have not been Christians.”
Just study medicine and go for 50 years in a tropical country to do your humanitarian work and raise your own money by giving concerts for the hospital you built. Then lets see if your so certain non-heretical doctrins and true teachings are good enough to follow Jesus....
@@hubertlanger7829 Let see how far he gets trying to pay for his sins with his humanitarian aid, on Judgement Day. We are not saved by works, but by grace, through faith, in Christ Jesus and what He did on the cross to pay our sin debt, who is GOD, not just a man. You can't just believe what you like and be saved, there are some foundations to the gospel, one being that Jesus is God.
@@Lloyd.B. Just read Mathiew 16: The Rich and the Kingdom of God
16 Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?”17 “Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”18 “Which ones?” he inquired. Jesus replied, “‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, 19 honour your father and mother,’[a] and ‘love your neighbour as yourself.’[b]”20 “All these I have kept,” the young man said. “What do I still lack?”21 Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
Who told you that Schweitzer lived for 50 years in Africa in order to go to heaven. I know of none of his writings suggesting that. But there are many of his predications that indicated that he wanted to make the world a better place in order to follow Jesus which is noble.
Albert Schweitzer did everything Jesus himself taught in this chapter. The money he could have kept for his own leisure as concert organist, surgeon, professor of theology / philosophy, he gave it to the poor. No mention in Mathew 16 of a grace of God or predestination needed to enter in heaven. Many self-righteous evangelical and calvinist preachers in their nice suits and big cars should have nightmares reading this chapter. Perhaps we should wisely make the truth-test Jesus advised us: Recognise them on their fruits. I can't find many rotten fruits on the tree Schweitzer planted!!
The certainly important apostel Paul didn't necessary know that his letters would end up one day in a christian bible. Had he known, he would have written perhaps certain chapters otherwise or more clear. Paul never knew Jesus during his life-time and the new testament tells us that there were quite hefty disputes between Paul , Peter and James about the teachings. Surprising , when you consider that some of them knew Jesus personally during his ministry. Things were obviously not so clear-cut, as preachers want to tell us nowadays.
Why not trying to follow Jesus as best as we can and hope for the best for the afterlife without bothering to much about it. God will be a better judge than we can ever hope for on earth, he knows the deepest of our hearts!
All those who know so exactly how to go to heaven with their theories of predestination and grace (and jealously claiming that there is no other way to come to God) try to bribe God in a similar way to those buying indulgences in order to go to heaven. They say to God : Look how good I am understanding you and I studied all my life the bible (and not the others who just tried to make earth a better place to live on, they shall go to hell), I certainly merit to go to heaven (and how dare you to give the late labourers the same salary?).
The bible doesn't tell us a lot about the heaven, and the authors did well.
First I was angry about the ending of the Gospel of John: "Then Jesus did many other miraculous signs in his disciples’ presence, signs that aren’t recorded in this scroll. But these things are written so that you will believe that Jesus is the Christ, God’s Son, and that believing, you will have life in his name.” (John 20:30-31). At first I thought why on earth didn't he tell us the other stories, but on second thought the ending wants to tell us something else: there is no need to fill pages and pages about what Jesus did or taught us, the essential messages are in the scolls (in the gospel), no need to try to know more about it. Just follow Jesus and live your life. The church always taught that Jesus was entirely human and entirely God. At which time Jesus got God's son was an open debate in the very early church: from the beginning of the world ?, his birth? , at baptism? on the cross? , with his resurrection? . Each christian should decide this with his own conscious. If God wanted to have certainty , Jesus would have written a book with clear instructions by his hand! God didn't create an "employment creation measure" for preachers and theologians with the Bible. If it(s not clear, it's not so important at the end of the day. For once the Catholics have a sound doctrine: Nobody knows who will go to hell or not. Perhaps the hell could even be empty at the end of the world, it's Gods decision.
@@Lloyd.B. Just read Mathiew 16: The Rich and the Kingdom of God
16 Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?”17 “Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”18 “Which ones?” he inquired. Jesus replied, “‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, 19 honour your father and mother,’[a] and ‘love your neighbour as yourself.’[b]”20 “All these I have kept,” the young man said. “What do I still lack?”21 Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
Who told you that Schweitzer lived for 50 years in Africa in order to go to heaven. I know of none of his writings suggesting that. But there are many of his predications that indicated that he wanted to make the world a better place in order to follow Jesus which is noble.
Albert Schweitzer did everything Jesus himself taught in this chapter. The money he could have kept for his own leisure as concert organist, surgeon, professor of theology / philosophy, he gave it to the poor. No mention in Mathew 16 of a grace of God or predestination needed to enter in heaven. Many self-righteuos evangelical and calvinist preachers in their nice suits and big cars should have nightmares reading this chapter. Perhaps we should wisely make the truth-test Jesus advised us: Recognise them on their fruits. I can't find many rotten fruits on the tree Schweitzer planted!!
The certainly important apostle Paul didn't necessary know that his letters would end up one day in a christian bible. Had he known, he would have written perhaps certain chapters otherwise or more clear. Paul never knew Jesus during his life-time and the new testament tells us that there were quite hefty disputes between Paul , Peter and James about the teachings. Surprising , when you consider that some of them knew Jesus personally during his ministry. Things were obviously not so clear-cut, as preachers want to tell us nowadays.
Why not trying to follow Jesus as best as we can and hope for the best for the afterlife without bothering to much about it. God will be a better judge than we can ever hope for on earth, he knows the deepest of our hearts!
All those who know so exactly how to go to heaven with their theories of predestination and grace (and jealously claiming that there is no other way to come to God) try to bribe God in a similar way to those buying indulgences in order to go to heaven. They say to God : Look how good I am understanding you and I studied all my life the bible (and not the others who just tried to make earth a better place to live on, they shall go to hell), I certainly merit to go to heaven (and how dare you to give the late labourers the same salary?). The bible doesn't tell us a lot about the heaven, and the authors did well. First I was angry about the ending of the Gospel of John: Then Jesus did many other miraculous signs in his disciples’ presence, signs that aren’t recorded in this scroll. But these things are written so that you will believe that Jesus is the Christ, God’s Son, and that believing, you will have life in his name.” (John 20:30-31). At first I thought why on earth didn't he tell us the other stories, but on second thought the ending wants to tell us something else: there is no need to fill pages and pages about what Jesus did and taught us, the essential messages are in the scolls (in the gospel), no need to try to know more about it. Just follow Jesus and live your life. The church always taught that Jesus was entirely human and entirely God. At which time Jesus got God's son was an open debate in the very early church: from the beginning of the world ?, his birth? , at baptism? on the cross? , with his resurrection? . Each christian should decide this with his own conscious. If God wanted to have certainty , Jesus would have written a book with clear instructions by his hand! God didn't create an "employment creation measure" for preachers and theologians with the Bible. If it not clear, it's not so important at the end of the day. For once the Catholics have a sound doctrine: Nobody knows who will go to hell or not. Perhaps the hell could even be empty at the end of the world, it's Gods decision.