Libertarian Revolution Pity that he failed totally to bring about sort of real world change, then. That is an apt description of libertarianism in general - a turning away from reality, cowardice.
@@ashleigh3021 Hoppe has influenced a lot of people, and I'd wager that his work will influence people long after he is gone. Perhaps libertarians will get the opportunity to put his concepts into action in a place like Liberland, or the Free Society project, or with seasteading, or a private city, like the proposed Liberstad in Norway.
@Mike Mike It deserves repeating because Hoppe has done a lot of great work over the years, and he does not get the respect or recognition which he deserves, and he is unfairly maligned by some people.
I am honored to have Hans H. Hoppe out talking again. I would have been great to have had Tom and Bob. And perhaps more comment on his masterwerk "Democacy the god that failed". (A book that needs to be sent to all the moaning minnies here in the UK who have a problem with the majority decision to leave -rightly in my view- the EU). Well done to the panel for this celebration.
"[Women] are 'economic land,' because they are equivalent to physical land in being original, nature-given factors of production. Yet will anyone deny title to a cow to the man that finds and domesticates her, putting her to use? For this is precisely what occurs in the case of land. Previously valueless 'wild' land, like wild animals, is taken and transformed by a man into goods useful for man. The 'mixing' of labor gives equivalent title in one case as in the other." -Murray N. Rothbard. Hippity hoppity.
Kon Berner if anything, Friedman's methodological claims have stood in academia more so than his policy recommendations. I just had a conversation with my social networks professor about his methodological work the other week. However, Chicago positivism is logical positivism without the logic, however, Friedman was clearly very muddled about the use of deductive approaches since he still employed them himself (I guess he just didn't give deduction any synthetic weight?) IMO, I don't think there really are any logical positivists in hard sciences since Popper kinda ended that. But yeah, "logical positivism" was abandoned by its own founders.
@@SirJamestheIII When it comes to economics, I prefer to focus on the subjective theory of value. These questions of being " certain" about anything in economics can be set aside. Being about human action, economics is ultimately a social science and therefore not a hard science. This doesn't at all mean it isn't useful, it just isn't certain when it comes to predictions or sweeping narratives about the state of affairs.
@@xingyuzhou1891 It is irrational to claim you know that which you do not. Economics is not science because it is based on human preferences. It is a branch of psychology. Do you believe that psychology is science? If so, tell me your theory of mind and then prove it. I understand rationalism, but it seems you do not.
Okay, I wanted to hear Gordons part, which satisfied me very much. I am currently reading Peter Janichs Handwerk und Mundwerk which HHH recommended at some time and it indeed delivers much more on this (without P. Janich being a praxeologist or libertarian). Edit: He actually mentioned him at 55:30
@@matheus.fialho Sadly, to my knowledge, there is no translation yet. Other books by him, like one on information, have been translated. Maybe she will translate it in the future, that was all I could find with a quick search: dlcl.stanford.edu/events/handwork-and-mouthwork-peter-janichs-informationsbegriff
23:16 But if an individual anticipates he will expropriated at the future, isn't his marginal utility of future goods is increased compared to the present goods? And if that is the case, his time preference will be decreased, not increased. Furthermore, if an individual expropriated at the present, his marginal utility of the present goods is increased, and his time preference will be increased. This is why people save more if they anticipating the storm or disaster will be occured at the future. And they will spend more if natural disaster occured at the present point of time.
"if an individual anticipates he will expropriated at the future, isn't his marginal utility of future goods is increased compared to the present goods?" Can you please elaborate?
It's funny too because some of the heated discussion that he recounts is actually quite innocuous compared to standard libertarian arguing on social media. I suppose in academic circles, that sort of comment fighting is considered unhinged.
The review of that "lying fraud" who Tom DiLorenzo is referring to at 24:50 can found on this Tom Woods Episode with DiLorenzo: ua-cam.com/video/sl-fgEFTRNk/v-deo.html
you just dont appreciate him very much like others do. Maybe u outsmart us or maybe we outsmart you. That's the point, and neither ur not being as smart as most people nor people's not being as smart as you is sad
![Understanding Marxism: Q&A with Richard D. Wolff [June 2019]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eU-AkeOyiOQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Hans-Hermann Hoppe is THE MAN. Probably the greatest living libertarian scholar, and one of the greatest of all time.
Libertarian Revolution Pity that he failed totally to bring about sort of real world change, then. That is an apt description of libertarianism in general - a turning away from reality, cowardice.
@@ashleigh3021 Hoppe has influenced a lot of people, and I'd wager that his work will influence people long after he is gone. Perhaps libertarians will get the opportunity to put his concepts into action in a place like Liberland, or the Free Society project, or with seasteading, or a private city, like the proposed Liberstad in Norway.
@Mike Mike It deserves repeating because Hoppe has done a lot of great work over the years, and he does not get the respect or recognition which he deserves, and he is unfairly maligned by some people.
WE MUST PROTECT THIS MAN AT ALL COST!
he really is!
I had a chance to meet HHH briefly at the 2015 AERC. He's amazing.
>so to speak.
I am honored to have Hans H. Hoppe out talking again. I would have been great to have had Tom and Bob. And perhaps more comment on his masterwerk "Democacy the god that failed".
(A book that needs to be sent to all the moaning minnies here in the UK who have a problem with the majority decision to leave -rightly in my view- the EU). Well done to the panel for this celebration.
I always need more Tom and Bob
Thanks for everything, Hoppe!!
AnCap frog is from this guy: "Hippity Hoppe-ty, get off of my property."
So to speak.
"[Women] are 'economic land,' because they are equivalent to physical land in being original, nature-given factors of production. Yet will anyone deny title to a cow to the man that finds and domesticates her, putting her to use? For this is precisely what occurs in the case of land. Previously valueless 'wild' land, like wild animals, is taken and transformed by a man into goods useful for man. The 'mixing' of labor gives equivalent title in one case as in the other."
-Murray N. Rothbard.
Hippity hoppity.
@@Max-nc4zn I need your source. Please.
@@senselessnothing Man Economy and State.
mises.org/library/man-economy-and-state-power-and-market/html/p/954
@@Max-nc4zn Thanks, but it's not about women. That would have been amazing.
There are still logical positivists?
Kon Berner if anything, Friedman's methodological claims have stood in academia more so than his policy recommendations. I just had a conversation with my social networks professor about his methodological work the other week. However, Chicago positivism is logical positivism without the logic, however, Friedman was clearly very muddled about the use of deductive approaches since he still employed them himself (I guess he just didn't give deduction any synthetic weight?) IMO, I don't think there really are any logical positivists in hard sciences since Popper kinda ended that. But yeah, "logical positivism" was abandoned by its own founders.
@@SirJamestheIII When it comes to economics, I prefer to focus on the subjective theory of value. These questions of being " certain" about anything in economics can be set aside. Being about human action, economics is ultimately a social science and therefore not a hard science. This doesn't at all mean it isn't useful, it just isn't certain when it comes to predictions or sweeping narratives about the state of affairs.
@@konberner170 So you still don't understand Rationalism. Okay, then.
@@xingyuzhou1891 It is irrational to claim you know that which you do not. Economics is not science because it is based on human preferences. It is a branch of psychology. Do you believe that psychology is science? If so, tell me your theory of mind and then prove it. I understand rationalism, but it seems you do not.
Hoppe is the boss.
Happy B-Day, Hans!
he is our titan
Okay, I wanted to hear Gordons part, which satisfied me very much. I am currently reading Peter Janichs Handwerk und Mundwerk which HHH recommended at some time and it indeed delivers much more on this (without P. Janich being a praxeologist or libertarian).
Edit: He actually mentioned him at 55:30
Do you know if there's any translation? My German is not good enough to read more than simple sentences.
@@matheus.fialho Sadly, to my knowledge, there is no translation yet. Other books by him, like one on information, have been translated.
Maybe she will translate it in the future, that was all I could find with a quick search: dlcl.stanford.edu/events/handwork-and-mouthwork-peter-janichs-informationsbegriff
I love Hoppe
23:16 But if an individual anticipates he will expropriated at the future, isn't his marginal utility of future goods is increased compared to the present goods? And if that is the case, his time preference will be decreased, not increased.
Furthermore, if an individual expropriated at the present, his marginal utility of the present goods is increased, and his time preference will be increased. This is why people save more if they anticipating the storm or disaster will be occured at the future. And they will spend more if natural disaster occured at the present point of time.
"if an individual anticipates he will expropriated at the future, isn't his marginal utility of future goods is increased compared to the present goods?" Can you please elaborate?
do someone know the name of th german philosoper that Hoppe talks ?
Peter Janich.
All awesome and moving, except Joseph Salerno's blow-by-blow recounting of some obscure online comments.
Embrace the autism. Autism literally means individualism.
It's funny too because some of the heated discussion that he recounts is actually quite innocuous compared to standard libertarian arguing on social media. I suppose in academic circles, that sort of comment fighting is considered unhinged.
LMFAO I found that funny
The review of that "lying fraud" who Tom DiLorenzo is referring to at 24:50 can found on this Tom Woods Episode with DiLorenzo: ua-cam.com/video/sl-fgEFTRNk/v-deo.html
I love Joe's comments on the triggering of Horwitz and White. That was great.
The MAN!
I think the absurd cash reserves that Apple holds confirms Hutt's and Hoppes theories.
Ahaha bi portakaldaki vitaminleri saymadığı kalmış babanın
Sorry DiLorenzo, but Baltimore owes it's degradation to more than just "the state", and you well know it.
This hero worship is sad. I dont see a point to it.
Yeah, there definitely is no point in getting together to say good things about your friends.
you just dont appreciate him very much like others do. Maybe u outsmart us or maybe we outsmart you. That's the point, and neither ur not being as smart as most people nor people's not being as smart as you is sad