I don't care if Jomez is early, late, on time, next month, yesterday, Tuesday, or next week. I'm watching. Best commentators and camera work in the business. Just wanted you fellas to know you are appreciated.
@@Rew123 I'm so sick of people complaining about a free product. Call it "simping" if you want. Just trying to show some appreciation for something I really enjoy. I'd recommend you stop being unreasonable and entitled.
I just wanna say that Jomez has been giving us all the things we’ve been asking for, scoring(first round at least), earlier uploads and seperatetop 10s. THANK YOU
Idk if I've gotten used to the new scoring or if they altered it slightly, but I'm def not annoyed by it anymore. Maybe they were right about that one. Either way, I agree. Great job being so responsive from Jomez!
Yeah Brad’s drop on 17 wasn’t fair. We had a better look at it sure, but guess what, he had the EXACT same look, and a spotter/a few spectators who saw the whole dang thing. I think Jerm’s reaction was fair. This is an integrity game. That disc got close to the line but it didn’t roll back…it’s tough to argue it crossed, but he did it. 🤷♂️
@@funkgremlin2765 amount of stokes back doesn’t matter, everyone on tour is trying to make a check. It’s an integrity thing. If you foot fault you should call it, if you see your disc never crossed the line, you drop where it last crossed. Sad it ruined his whole experience watching…those are just ripple effects. This is a 1 to 2 stroke difference, he finished T14. That’s probably $100’s of dollars in other peoples pockets that he just yanked out to put in his own.
Eagle’s forehand on 11 (5:20) is nothing short of ridiculous. Regardless of the drop in elevation. Like Jerm points out, it actually looks as if he’s putting 6 % power behind it. Yet it flies 500 ft +.
I'm surprised at Jeremy and Paul's comments for that play on 17 for Williams OB throw. I say this as someone who was a few feet away from where it landed. The spotter indicated (as did several spectators around him), that it never crossed, and since we had such a good angle on it, were going to show him the stake where it crossed a couple hundred feet further back. The way Williams responded, I think he knew it too. He was in a hurry to make the throw, tossed his marker down in bounds, mumbled about it being a "gray zone" and played it and got out of there. The spotter said nothing after that --said the players are allowed to make the call, not him, and sometimes don't even ask. Guess that's part of the sport. Way harder to save bogey from the spot where it crossed OB.
If it had anything to do with 'the card's opinion, they probably gave it to him because he is 10 strokes back, and no REAL threat to be anywhere near the lead.
I don't understand I am a huge Lizotte fan and watch his youtube he is so good. But everytime I watch him in a tournament he seems to get into his feelings when he does bad and never quite gets back to what he can play. I hope he turns it around the next 2 days.
TEAM HEIMBURG FTW. Good to see Brad finally sunk one of his good putts at hole 11. I feel the pain of Lizotte though, he just not hitting. Eagles forehand distance is incredible. Looks like he is throwing 100 feet when he does that haha! IMO, this course is perfectly setup for the current skill level of the MPO.
I’m all for benefit of doubt goes to the player but it’s physically impossible Bradley’s shot crossed in bounds on 17. In a game where small breaks can determine outcomes I think we need to be real and call that out.
I'm with big Jerm.. Eagle's new forehand just doesn't make any sense. Slow it down and you can see the power in the way he leads with his elbow and gets unreal whip, but at full speed, it literally just looks like a 20% power flick upshot.
Thanks, as always, Jomez - even though the scoring for the field is truly baffling - I've simply given up trying to work out where people actually are in the event. Nevertheless, I would like to propose a new way to rank disc golfers: You get ranked on the length of the shortest putt you've missed in a tournament for the whole year. I'd REALLY love to see that list.
Maybe for round 1, and slower into the green on new pin placements in the following rounds. I like the quick flyover for the following rounds as a quick refresher, and I still will skip them if I recognize the hole. Jomez is trying to keep video lengths down.
@@timwcronin, either the first round or last. Some people only show up to watch final round coverage. And I've noticed that the commentary sometimes gets cut short because the flyover happens so fast.
With this coverage being edited and posted well after the round…it would be a cool added feature to show disc selection on each shot…we get it on some tee shots, but not all.
Unfortunately they can't do that. Right now the players only send the post production crews, typically Jomez only, the discs they threw off the tee. But that's optional, and not every player does that. It would be too much to ask players to send in dozens of disc information, and the commentary crew can't possibly know them all, nor the production crew prior to the voiceover. It's more than a time issue in post. It's a complex set of issues, and there's a number of reasons it's inconsistent, and only done for drives for some players. 🙂
I’ve always wondered why OB is disc golf plays like a hazard in ball golf…. If you want to make the OB rule clear and obvious, make OB stroke and distance. You’d see more scoring separation and higher overall scoring in general. You’d also probably see players change their game plans.
OB doesn't play like a hazard. A hazard plays like a hazard, OB like OB. On 17 Bradley should've taken a lie where the disc crossed OB. He cheated, but the spotters can't enforce the lie. I assume this is the play which spawned your comment.
@@timwcronin you either don’t play ball golf or understand my comment. OB in ball golf is always stroke and distance, which means you would take a penalty stroke and take your next shot from the same spot you just played from. If you hit into a hazard, you would take a penalty stroke then take your next shot from where you last crossed into the defined hazard area. But yes, I was referring to 17.
@@ChayseGrizzell ah. You're right. Hazard in ball golf is OB in disc golf. Hazard in disc golf is penalty and play from your lie. I don't play ball golf much and apparently only played with hazards and no OB
Eventhough im loving everything that Jomez does. I gotta say im getting tired of Jerm complaining about holes being too hard, when people are playing the courses -20 in three rounds..
Dang. Big Jerm stating the facts. I'm surprised he reads the comments with how overly critical people can be. Good on you though- love your commentary!
@@bigjermdg The point still stands regardless of who says it. The courses need to evolve in the pace that the players evolve. Its not a big issue that some holes are evolving faster than the players. It’s great for us amateurs to see pros struggling from time to time
Sad to see blatant cheating from Brad on 17. I understand it's tough to realize you're falling off the pace, but that's no excuse to start trying to steal strokes back.
Eh, I mean rules aren’t really rules, they’re suggestions! Next time I get a really unfair chain-out on a putt, I’ll just ask my card-mates to give it to me and pretend it went in. I mean, it’s close enough. But it’s cool, cuz it’s like if you let ME cheat a little, then I’ll let YOU cheat a little next time you get a close one. Well, actually, if it happens to the LEADER or something…then that’s when it’s important enough and we’ll probably call it the right way and not let him cheat. Anyways…just don’t worry about it bro! Y do u care?
I still think we have to stop using the word "power" in regards to shots that go far. I think we can all agree it's mostly form, technique, knowing discs, etc etc. When 15 year olds that weigh 125lbs can throw over 500+ then it's more clean form and commitment. The actual most powerful man in the world is probably throwing 300ft. Lol
Also, there is not a single hole in Disc Golf that is a must get unless you're tied or down 1 going into Hole 18. "must get" has to go. "death" putt has to go.
@@oskarius93 Of course if you have everything else down BUT also have Power..that is helpful but to sit here and pretend that Calvin Heimburg is some powerful/strong human being is just not realistic. Emerson Keith. Etc etc. Again, little kids throwing 500ft that haven't hit puberty yet. That's not a sign of POWER as much as it is form and technique. How easy would it be to just say "wow that shot was far" or "wow he got amazing distance on that shot". Instead of seeing Michael Johansen throw 500ft and saying "wow the has so much power". Lol
@@jaw9152 see you actually had sly little wording there. The SHOT had power BECAUSE of the form and technique. Doesn't mean the player is powerful or some strong human. Again, pre pubescent kids are throwing 500ft.
Please, stop making 1000' par 4's. These course designers are gonna kill all these athletes long term careers by making every challenge a distance challenge. With 3 birdies on a hole I feel like anyone can do the math and see that it should be a par 5.
Did anyone else catch Jerm just being really disagreeable this whole broadcast? Maybe I’m just misreading and if I did my bad, but it seems constant haha
@@bud8254 Every shot doesn’t have to be the greatest shot ever taken. Hole 17, Eagle drive “what an unfair advantage”, KJ steps up right after same shot, then Simon and I bet a large percentage of the pro field… you can be “positive” without exaggeration but Jerm can’t. I like Jerm but as a professional commentator he needs to spend time with a thesaurus and find some new ways to describe situations and keep commentary feeling fresh. FYI. Wasn’t my original point but “Unbiased and Positive” is a contradiction when used in conjunction. It’s completely biased if a commentator only says positive things.
Okay, NGL I have a problem with the way disc golf handles "course records." Because one or two holes have been changed, the course record is suddenly new? The course record here is Paul's -18. Period.
Jerm needs to learn to be comfortable with a little bit of silence. From the moment a player step up to the tee to the moment the disc lands, he doesn't stop talking. The worst is when he isn't sure what's happening but is backtracking and hedging in the middle of the flight like "this is too turned over except oh, it's trying to fight out. And is thiiiisss gonna make it? Maaayyybbee, aaandd iiiittttt will"
Simon unfairly squeaks onto yet another lead card because of that special European PDGA number awarding system, which reserved numbers for them. Simon's got an asterisk *PDGA No. No way he should be anywhere close to *8k. *8k is for veterans, not some European Simon come-latelies
What a weird thing to complain about. How do you 'fairly' decide which 2 out of 8 tied players go onto a 2nd round lead card? Alphabetical order? Who has least amount of discs in their bag? The answer is that you can't and it doesn't really matter. Chin up buttercup.
@@liberateyourslack There is already an established 2nd round card assignment process, the point isn't the process Cuppy McCake, it's how the player numbers were assigned for those in Europe who have basically jumped the line. Simon gets away with this all the time, it should only matter in European events. What a telling thing to get so wrong on your part. Your liberated mind seems to be slacking. Simon's number should be at least 25k on a level playing field, not an outlandish *8k for joining around 2005.
@@liberateyourslack I hope you get Simon-Bumped from a lead card, then you can tell me how fair things are, with all the potential PR revenue you may have lost. I can tell you this, given a 1st round tie with Simon, he won't be bumping me off any lead card, he'll be taking the down card hike.
@@liberateyourslack Thanks for telling me what I can't answer when you didn't understand my statement. Here is the answer to the question you asked, in relation to what I actually said. All those who received European jump the PDGA No. line get to use those much lower numbers in European events. (let Europeans screw Europeans) When playing in America they use a temporary PDGA number commiserate with the US PDGA numbers for that year/date they registered i.e. PDGA issued number range for 2005 (hypothetical) 27,000 to 28,000. Let's say Simon joined 06.30.2005 his USA-use temp. no. would be 27,500. You could narrow that no. down to a specific date and corresponding number, by looking at other players who legitimately received their PDGA numbers around that date, and you don't really have to get that fine tuned for card bumping tie purposes. Line jumpers like Simon would have 2 numbers, each specifically apply to where they are playing. Simon gets over promoted (Promotion = $$$) due to his *8k (McCray era) number, when it should be 25k or higher.
Hole 17 makes the case for not using OB lines unless they can positively be called by trained spotters. I am about 98% sure the disc didn't cross the line but that means I am 2% not sure. And I have this awesome video to watch, how sure can they be on the course without that video? All this "cheating" talk about Williams is way out of line (Jerm maybe needs to apologize for indirectly calling Brad a cheater). btw lol @ ever using the word of a spectator to mark your disc - that would be crazy. There is exactly one spectator that has a good look at it and he is like 30 feet away. Do you take a vote of the crowd?
I have NOTHING against Bradley, he was told by people standing there that his disc didn't cross, the spotter confirmed and where the disc was located he had plenty of indicators that suggested he should play his next shot from where it crossed
Hey Germ, how many times are u gonna bring up the story about Simon almost acing that practice round at ledgestone?? It was cool the first time now it's starting to get weird
I don't care if Jomez is early, late, on time, next month, yesterday, Tuesday, or next week. I'm watching. Best commentators and camera work in the business. Just wanted you fellas to know you are appreciated.
@@Rew123 I'm so sick of people complaining about a free product. Call it "simping" if you want. Just trying to show some appreciation for something I really enjoy. I'd recommend you stop being unreasonable and entitled.
@Rew123 nah man this isn't it
@@Rew123go somewhere else dude. If you can’t respect the work put into this then you don’t belong on this Chanel
Thanks for all the work to get these posted in time for my morning coffee.
I just wanna say that Jomez has been giving us all the things we’ve been asking for, scoring(first round at least), earlier uploads and seperatetop 10s. THANK YOU
Idk if I've gotten used to the new scoring or if they altered it slightly, but I'm def not annoyed by it anymore. Maybe they were right about that one. Either way, I agree. Great job being so responsive from Jomez!
Both videos being under 40 minutes long seems impressive given the course - I appreciate that!
i love how defeated Jerm sounds when talking about eagle's forehand 🤣
It's absurd how effortless it looks. I look like I'm trying twice as hard when I'm throwing 1/3rd the distance.
Great coverage and commentary as always! Looking forward to seeing AB on the lead card! He, Kevin, and Eagle will put on a huge power show!
Insane turn around time, thank you!
KJ back on lead card love to see it
This tournament is so close between 6 players. What we love to see
Yeah Brad’s drop on 17 wasn’t fair. We had a better look at it sure, but guess what, he had the EXACT same look, and a spotter/a few spectators who saw the whole dang thing. I think Jerm’s reaction was fair. This is an integrity game. That disc got close to the line but it didn’t roll back…it’s tough to argue it crossed, but he did it. 🤷♂️
@@brooksy3069the round is ruined for you because a dude 9 strokes back wasn’t punished properly?
@@brooksy3069dude, is that ruined a whole round of disc golf you may have a brittle spirit.
@@cbuggy brittle spirit confirmed.
@@funkgremlin2765 amount of stokes back doesn’t matter, everyone on tour is trying to make a check. It’s an integrity thing. If you foot fault you should call it, if you see your disc never crossed the line, you drop where it last crossed. Sad it ruined his whole experience watching…those are just ripple effects. This is a 1 to 2 stroke difference, he finished T14. That’s probably $100’s of dollars in other peoples pockets that he just yanked out to put in his own.
Eagle’s forehand on 11 (5:20) is nothing short of ridiculous. Regardless of the drop in elevation. Like Jerm points out, it actually looks as if he’s putting 6 % power behind it. Yet it flies 500 ft +.
I'm surprised at Jeremy and Paul's comments for that play on 17 for Williams OB throw. I say this as someone who was a few feet away from where it landed. The spotter indicated (as did several spectators around him), that it never crossed, and since we had such a good angle on it, were going to show him the stake where it crossed a couple hundred feet further back. The way Williams responded, I think he knew it too. He was in a hurry to make the throw, tossed his marker down in bounds, mumbled about it being a "gray zone" and played it and got out of there. The spotter said nothing after that --said the players are allowed to make the call, not him, and sometimes don't even ask. Guess that's part of the sport. Way harder to save bogey from the spot where it crossed OB.
I didn't know all that happened. That's not good, especially if people were adamantly saying that it did not cross.
@@bigjermdg I think you covered it well during commentary by expressing your doubts but also keeping it copacetic.
What a shame. Be better Bradley Williams.
If it had anything to do with 'the card's opinion, they probably gave it to him because he is 10 strokes back, and no REAL threat to be anywhere near the lead.
Go team go! See you in Pennsyvlania next week.
I don't understand I am a huge Lizotte fan and watch his youtube he is so good. But everytime I watch him in a tournament he seems to get into his feelings when he does bad and never quite gets back to what he can play. I hope he turns it around the next 2 days.
This aged well 😌
Drink everytime Jerm says “green light”…good luck
Thank you. Very entertaining.
Just a heads up! "Williams" is misspelled in the title. Loving the coverage!
Had to go look. I was hoping they gave him an extra L for his drop on 17.
keep up the awesome work!
It's real nice to see Kevin in contention again, he has been a bit back in the scores for a while. Fun player to watch.
What is the "Play with the Champs" video Jerm talks about with Bert Kreischer? Something not out yet, I'm assuming?
Simon 'dancing the line' lines!
"Brad doesn't show a lot of emotion".....yeah, about that 😂
There is no rule in baseball that says the tie goes to the runner. I know people say that all the time, but it's not in the rulebook.
TEAM HEIMBURG FTW. Good to see Brad finally sunk one of his good putts at hole 11. I feel the pain of Lizotte though, he just not hitting. Eagles forehand distance is incredible. Looks like he is throwing 100 feet when he does that haha! IMO, this course is perfectly setup for the current skill level of the MPO.
I needed Eagle McMahon forehands today :)
wish Jomez would show the distance on the screen of how far these guys are throwing
Fans standing where a disc can land inbounds is frustrating to see
‘those limbs get limbier’ -Jerm
I’m all for benefit of doubt goes to the player but it’s physically impossible Bradley’s shot crossed in bounds on 17. In a game where small breaks can determine outcomes I think we need to be real and call that out.
"So did the top keep spinning? Were those really Dom's kids, or was he still dreaming?"
-- spotter on 18
I'm with big Jerm.. Eagle's new forehand just doesn't make any sense. Slow it down and you can see the power in the way he leads with his elbow and gets unreal whip, but at full speed, it literally just looks like a 20% power flick upshot.
very powerful round
Thanks, as always, Jomez - even though the scoring for the field is truly baffling - I've simply given up trying to work out where people actually are in the event.
Nevertheless, I would like to propose a new way to rank disc golfers:
You get ranked on the length of the shortest putt you've missed in a tournament for the whole year.
I'd REALLY love to see that list.
Ty jomez!
Let's go!
Feels like slowing down the hole flyovers just a bit would be an improvement.
Maybe for round 1, and slower into the green on new pin placements in the following rounds. I like the quick flyover for the following rounds as a quick refresher, and I still will skip them if I recognize the hole. Jomez is trying to keep video lengths down.
@@timwcronin, either the first round or last. Some people only show up to watch final round coverage. And I've noticed that the commentary sometimes gets cut short because the flyover happens so fast.
lol brad got away with a big one there lol
Can we please get a Paul’s pooper scooper for every round? Interesting to hear which holes you guys dislike
Uli mentions AB every single round of coverage. 💕
He's crushing!
I like “Scaramblevania”
Anyone knows the brand of shoes Eagle is wearing?
probably vivo?
Thank you @@jannemakela7098
With this coverage being edited and posted well after the round…it would be a cool added feature to show disc selection on each shot…we get it on some tee shots, but not all.
I suggest you get on it then, partna.
"With all the free coverage you give us, you should really give us more because I said so. You have the time." FIFY
Unfortunately they can't do that. Right now the players only send the post production crews, typically Jomez only, the discs they threw off the tee. But that's optional, and not every player does that. It would be too much to ask players to send in dozens of disc information, and the commentary crew can't possibly know them all, nor the production crew prior to the voiceover. It's more than a time issue in post. It's a complex set of issues, and there's a number of reasons it's inconsistent, and only done for drives for some players. 🙂
“Ball don’t lie!”
gah dayum
29:51 Come on Jerm, tell us how your really feel.
I’ve always wondered why OB is disc golf plays like a hazard in ball golf…. If you want to make the OB rule clear and obvious, make OB stroke and distance. You’d see more scoring separation and higher overall scoring in general. You’d also probably see players change their game plans.
OB doesn't play like a hazard. A hazard plays like a hazard, OB like OB. On 17 Bradley should've taken a lie where the disc crossed OB. He cheated, but the spotters can't enforce the lie. I assume this is the play which spawned your comment.
@@timwcronin you either don’t play ball golf or understand my comment. OB in ball golf is always stroke and distance, which means you would take a penalty stroke and take your next shot from the same spot you just played from. If you hit into a hazard, you would take a penalty stroke then take your next shot from where you last crossed into the defined hazard area. But yes, I was referring to 17.
@@ChayseGrizzell ah. You're right. Hazard in ball golf is OB in disc golf. Hazard in disc golf is penalty and play from your lie. I don't play ball golf much and apparently only played with hazards and no OB
Scrambodia!
Y'all need to hit that like button! The views to likes ratio is disappointing.
69 likes. Gotta keep it there
Likes shouldn't exist if dislikes can't count
Your right. I'm on it! 👍
Anybody get the feeling that Koling is taking shots at Bradley Williams?
I felt that way a bit. Throughout the coverage he was kind of talking up the other players and their shots, and a bit of the opposite towards Bradley.
“Guaranteed birdie” Jeremy wtf.
At least Simon gets his money back since it was guaranteed
5:44 had he fell, it would have went in...
Simon throwing a 14.5 speed driver? 😳
Hes been throwing a dimension all year
How does Kevin Jones not get a follow-flight on Hole 11? I appreciate the replay, but you're Jomez, guys. You set the bar high.
I LIKE HYPE TRAINS!
Eventhough im loving everything that Jomez does. I gotta say im getting tired of Jerm complaining about holes being too hard, when people are playing the courses -20 in three rounds..
Just because you're hearing it from me doesn't mean I'm the only one saying it.
I’m with @bigjermdg. Birdie rates too low on some of these holes. Makes it less interesting to watch if most ppl have to settle for simple pars.
Dang. Big Jerm stating the facts. I'm surprised he reads the comments with how overly critical people can be. Good on you though- love your commentary!
@@bigjermdg The point still stands regardless of who says it. The courses need to evolve in the pace that the players evolve. Its not a big issue that some holes are evolving faster than the players. It’s great for us amateurs to see pros struggling from time to time
Sad to see blatant cheating from Brad on 17. I understand it's tough to realize you're falling off the pace, but that's no excuse to start trying to steal strokes back.
I feel like they don't talk about how much of a juicer simon really is with distance / power drives. Like on hole 10, jeezus
Eh, I mean rules aren’t really rules, they’re suggestions! Next time I get a really unfair chain-out on a putt, I’ll just ask my card-mates to give it to me and pretend it went in. I mean, it’s close enough.
But it’s cool, cuz it’s like if you let ME cheat a little, then I’ll let YOU cheat a little next time you get a close one.
Well, actually, if it happens to the LEADER or something…then that’s when it’s important enough and we’ll probably call it the right way and not let him cheat.
Anyways…just don’t worry about it bro! Y do u care?
How much is Eagle paying Physics to allow him to throw forehands that soft that far? 😡
Tie goes to the runner is not a thing. You’re out or safe
EAGLE KNIEVEL
I still think we have to stop using the word "power" in regards to shots that go far. I think we can all agree it's mostly form, technique, knowing discs, etc etc. When 15 year olds that weigh 125lbs can throw over 500+ then it's more clean form and commitment. The actual most powerful man in the world is probably throwing 300ft. Lol
Also, there is not a single hole in Disc Golf that is a must get unless you're tied or down 1 going into Hole 18. "must get" has to go. "death" putt has to go.
Disagree, it's just a matter of how well you transmit your power to the disc, through technique and timing etc.
It’s almost like form, technique, knowing discs, etc etc contribute to overall shot power. Crazy thought
@@oskarius93
Of course if you have everything else down BUT also have Power..that is helpful but to sit here and pretend that Calvin Heimburg is some powerful/strong human being is just not realistic. Emerson Keith. Etc etc. Again, little kids throwing 500ft that haven't hit puberty yet. That's not a sign of POWER as much as it is form and technique. How easy would it be to just say "wow that shot was far" or "wow he got amazing distance on that shot". Instead of seeing Michael Johansen throw 500ft and saying "wow the has so much power". Lol
@@jaw9152 see you actually had sly little wording there. The SHOT had power BECAUSE of the form and technique. Doesn't mean the player is powerful or some strong human. Again, pre pubescent kids are throwing 500ft.
Way to spoil hole 13 😳
Bradley needs some looser shorts for this tournament
Please, stop making 1000' par 4's. These course designers are gonna kill all these athletes long term careers by making every challenge a distance challenge. With 3 birdies on a hole I feel like anyone can do the math and see that it should be a par 5.
Did anyone else catch Jerm just being really disagreeable this whole broadcast? Maybe I’m just misreading and if I did my bad, but it seems constant haha
Jerm’s exaggeration and exasperation on every throw… once you hear it you can’t help but roll your eyes each time.
That's kinda the job of a commentator. To be unbiased and positive.
@@bud8254 Every shot doesn’t have to be the greatest shot ever taken. Hole 17, Eagle drive “what an unfair advantage”, KJ steps up right after same shot, then Simon and I bet a large percentage of the pro field… you can be “positive” without exaggeration but
Jerm can’t. I like Jerm but as a professional commentator he needs to spend time with a thesaurus and find some new ways to describe situations and keep commentary feeling fresh.
FYI. Wasn’t my original point but “Unbiased and Positive” is a contradiction when used in conjunction. It’s completely biased if a commentator only says positive things.
@@TheGreatestJuJu lol, ok dude. You win.
@@bud8254 🤣😂🤣
Okay, NGL I have a problem with the way disc golf handles "course records." Because one or two holes have been changed, the course record is suddenly new? The course record here is Paul's -18. Period.
Jerm needs to learn to be comfortable with a little bit of silence. From the moment a player step up to the tee to the moment the disc lands, he doesn't stop talking. The worst is when he isn't sure what's happening but is backtracking and hedging in the middle of the flight like "this is too turned over except oh, it's trying to fight out. And is thiiiisss gonna make it? Maaayyybbee, aaandd iiiittttt will"
Simon unfairly squeaks onto yet another lead card because of that special European PDGA number awarding system, which reserved numbers for them. Simon's got an asterisk *PDGA No. No way he should be anywhere close to *8k. *8k is for veterans, not some European Simon come-latelies
What a weird thing to complain about. How do you 'fairly' decide which 2 out of 8 tied players go onto a 2nd round lead card? Alphabetical order? Who has least amount of discs in their bag? The answer is that you can't and it doesn't really matter. Chin up buttercup.
@@liberateyourslack There is already an established 2nd round card assignment process, the point isn't the process Cuppy McCake, it's how the player numbers were assigned for those in Europe who have basically jumped the line. Simon gets away with this all the time, it should only matter in European events. What a telling thing to get so wrong on your part. Your liberated mind seems to be slacking. Simon's number should be at least 25k on a level playing field, not an outlandish *8k for joining around 2005.
@@liberateyourslack I hope you get Simon-Bumped from a lead card, then you can tell me how fair things are, with all the potential PR revenue you may have lost. I can tell you this, given a 1st round tie with Simon, he won't be bumping me off any lead card, he'll be taking the down card hike.
@@liberateyourslack Thanks for telling me what I can't answer when you didn't understand my statement. Here is the answer to the question you asked, in relation to what I actually said. All those who received European jump the PDGA No. line get to use those much lower numbers in European events. (let Europeans screw Europeans) When playing in America they use a temporary PDGA number commiserate with the US PDGA numbers for that year/date they registered i.e. PDGA issued number range for 2005 (hypothetical) 27,000 to 28,000. Let's say Simon joined 06.30.2005 his USA-use temp. no. would be 27,500. You could narrow that no. down to a specific date and corresponding number, by looking at other players who legitimately received their PDGA numbers around that date, and you don't really have to get that fine tuned for card bumping tie purposes. Line jumpers like Simon would have 2 numbers, each specifically apply to where they are playing. Simon gets over promoted (Promotion = $$$) due to his *8k (McCray era) number, when it should be 25k or higher.
Hole 17 makes the case for not using OB lines unless they can positively be called by trained spotters. I am about 98% sure the disc didn't cross the line but that means I am 2% not sure. And I have this awesome video to watch, how sure can they be on the course without that video?
All this "cheating" talk about Williams is way out of line (Jerm maybe needs to apologize for indirectly calling Brad a cheater).
btw lol @ ever using the word of a spectator to mark your disc - that would be crazy. There is exactly one spectator that has a good look at it and he is like 30 feet away. Do you take a vote of the crowd?
From the footage here, it clearly did not cross. There is absolutely no way you can disagree with that.
I have NOTHING against Bradley, he was told by people standing there that his disc didn't cross, the spotter confirmed and where the disc was located he had plenty of indicators that suggested he should play his next shot from where it crossed
sad to see that simon has gone past his prime :(
?
Not sure what you mean? Lead card is pretty good!!
really ridiculous trolling comment.
😂
Lololol what? He's on lead card dude.
hole 16 was such a fun hole to watch. why did they have to change it
Hole 10 did make me feel feelings. I feel like you jinxed the sh!t out of Simon
Hey Germ, how many times are u gonna bring up the story about Simon almost acing that practice round at ledgestone?? It was cool the first time now it's starting to get weird