MTGs HARDEST rule is actually EASY - Let me explain: Layers for Beginners

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
  • It's finally here, the Layers video. Layers is notorious for being MTGs hardest rule to wrap your head around. In this video, I break down and explain Layers, Timestamps, Dependencies and cover everything you'll need to know about Layers, so you can apply them in you next game of Commander!
    0:00 Intro
    0:24 What are Layers?
    1:00 Layers practice example
    1:42 The 7 Layers
    3:17 How to apply Layers
    3:59 Answering the example
    5:32 Timestamps
    6:10 When do Timestamps get applied?
    6:33 Timestamp example
    7:31 Dependencies
    8:10 Dependencies example
    8:46 Layers Summary
    Thanks for watching!
    #MagicTheGathering #mtg
    JJJreact
    🐤 Twitter - / attackoncards
    🎥 TikTok - / attackoncardboard
    To support the channel, feel free to check out our referral links -
    Want a cool custom playmat? Check out Quokka Mousepads:
    quokkamousepads.com/?ref=Atta...
    Use code ATTACK for 15% off
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 833

  • @andrewerickson2922
    @andrewerickson2922 11 місяців тому +247

    This is the most in-depth beginners guide ever

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +26

      It was one of those rulings where I couldn't not talk about just Layers, I had to include Timestamps and Dependencies, just to make sure everyone had all the info they needed, but I'm pretty confident I presented the info in a way that was easily digestible :)

    • @NerdJake
      @NerdJake 11 місяців тому +4

      I was so proud of myself having mastered the stack and priority, now I watch this and it's really humiliating to admit to be a beginner, but you're right 😢

    • @TheThiccestChungus
      @TheThiccestChungus 11 місяців тому +1

      Have you ever tried to learn unity?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      @@TheThiccestChungus Not yet. I'm currently learning After Effects as right now I just do everything in Premiere 😅😅

    • @iurifale7324
      @iurifale7324 11 місяців тому

      ​@@NerdJakee 1qq no Zé azzx😢😅😅

  • @JiorujiDerako
    @JiorujiDerako 11 місяців тому +126

    This is why, when I was a judge, I had a card in my pocket at all times that listed out the layer order :D I think over the few years I judged at events, I only ever had to refer to the layers rules a couple of times, but it was (IMO) the most complicated portion of the rules to keep memorized!
    I also still remember Humilty + Opalescence (and increasingly complicated additions to that combo, like adding a second Humility, etc) being a popular topic and challenge among judges when it was a particularly slow evening :P Luckily that was an interaction that never came up in any tournament, Legacy/Vintage players tend to not be the sorts to bring meme "stump a judge" decks to official tournaments. (Commander players on the other hand not so much, but at the time, a lot of the players I knew who had Commander/EDH decks _were_ judges)

    • @blitZeero
      @blitZeero 11 місяців тому

      I had another favourite interaction involving Blood Moon: together with Conversion and creating dependencies AFTER the timestamp order was determined by simply playing a land

    • @Brass319
      @Brass319 Місяць тому

      So, wait, hold on, the video never mentions this, but wouldn't opalescence being played first cause humility to remove all abilities from all enchantments when it enters the field, including itself???? or something like that ??????
      but then, because opalescence has been turned off, it no longer is affected and regains its abilities in theory at least???????????

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  Місяць тому +1

      @@Brass319 When the Layers "program" runs, it goes through each of the layers one at a time. Once it's applied one layer, it gets locked in and the 'program' doesn't go back to previous layers to change anything. Lower layers cant effect upper layers.
      Opalescence effects Layers 4 and 7. Humility effects Layers 6 and 7. So we apply in order -> 4 - Enchantments become creatures, 6 - Creatures lose abilities, 7 - Creature P/t settings, but we have two effects trying to apply here, so time stamps kick in.

  • @chrisvainio
    @chrisvainio 11 місяців тому +55

    Having a card in your pocket is a great idea. I would actually like to see the steps of the turn and tips cards pop-up in draft packs more often than the “magic minigame“ cards. A card on the stack, or even a card on the layers would be a great thing to include.

    • @mydadgaveupopcorn
      @mydadgaveupopcorn 11 місяців тому +5

      I scoop these up all the time. Have a whole commander sized deck box of them I keep with me in my bag for new players. If someone brings their significant other or a friend and they're just watching, I'll pass them one too. I also have a teaching kit I keep with me for between rounds. Best way to get new players into the game: have the resources to show them without making it complicated.

  • @gingyplays9843
    @gingyplays9843 11 місяців тому +17

    Here's a fun example of layers colossus hammer makes creature lose flying but gets +10/10 so if you want a flying hammer you've got to equip an equipment that gives flying after you equipment hammer

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +5

      Heck yeah! Timestamps!

    • @mateumitjans5281
      @mateumitjans5281 9 місяців тому +1

      So the timestamps there depend on when the equipment entered the battlefield or on which was equiped first/last??

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  9 місяців тому +5

      When the equipment ETBs it gets a time stamp and when it equips, it gets a new one.

  • @greenemperor1604
    @greenemperor1604 11 місяців тому +11

    I've been playing magic with my friend for 11 years and have never heard of Layers until now. This is why people say the game's too complicated to start playing. That doesn't make sense when you say it. Both are static effects. So when looking at it and reading it. it seems that it would lose the ability lol wow how very insightful ❤

  • @jettblade
    @jettblade 11 місяців тому +26

    Really helpful even for an experienced player like myself. Been playing for almost 20 years and still haven't gotten explanations as clear as this video was. This can be a really complicated game and its nice to see explanations like this to help clear confusion.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +3

      That's the goal of this channel. Taking "complicated" rules, and breaking them down so they're easier to digest :)

  • @thomasgryboski8978
    @thomasgryboski8978 10 місяців тому +11

    i feel like the only reason this whole thing feels so complicated is because ability removal is on too late of a layer leading to removed abilities still applying

  • @loganator326
    @loganator326 11 місяців тому +7

    Legitimately super informative, I'm glad someone finally laid it out in a way that's understandable

  • @NerdJake
    @NerdJake 11 місяців тому +4

    When you formulate the question and while formulating it you see where your thinking eas wrong :D
    Really good video, I had no idea about these rules! Didnt even know they exist! Thanks a lot!!!

  • @Iceboundjester8
    @Iceboundjester8 11 місяців тому +25

    I am happy you came up on my fyp! You videos are well thought out, educational, and beginner friendly. You pacing with starting the videos of in clear view of what’s to come is pleasant, and therapeutic. Something that most videos like these lack. Please keep up the work! I look forward to you and the community you grow!❤❤❤

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      That's wonderful to hear 😁 I have such a passion for this game and I love helping people get more into it! 😀
      If you've ever got any questions, I'm always reading the comments and I'm happy to help 🙂

  • @kurts.7225
    @kurts.7225 11 місяців тому +1

    The good this will do for the overall knowledge of the game is immense based solely on how easily it was broken down. I don't even think the TCC has a video like this.
    Tyvm and crowd-surf the Karn

  • @marcuswehle1833
    @marcuswehle1833 11 місяців тому +2

    That was incredibly helpful. I had no knowledge of these rules. I did not see some of the cards you showed in a game before. Now I know what to do when I see it.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      Glad I could help. Layers don't come up all too often, and I wouldn't expect anyone to remember the Layers list if they're playing casually, but it's a good thing to be aware of and keep in mind :)

  • @Supernichtpatrick
    @Supernichtpatrick 11 місяців тому +35

    I really dislike that the dependency rule does not apply to earlier layers. Would that not make things simpler as the first example (making lands into mountaind) is clearly made way more complicated by the current layer rules? Maybe I am missing cases in which things are held together by this system.

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому +5

      If dependencies applied to earlier layers, humility and opalescence would create an undeterminable board state.

    • @ganondorc8546
      @ganondorc8546 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@sy-py Could you elaborate? Maybe I just don't understand, but the way I interpret it, if dependencies would apply to earlier layers, nothing would change regarding the humility and opalescence interaction. Since they're on the same layer (power/toughness) and aren't dependent on one another, timestamps make the board state determinable here. Are you trying to say that the effect of humility is dependent on the fact that it's an enchantment? Because opalescence specifically states that it's still an enchantment, so there's no conflict or dependency here that I can tell.

    • @LaurieCheers
      @LaurieCheers 11 місяців тому +4

      Then Humility's ability would depend on the Opalescences (because they change the set of creatures that can be humiliated), but the Opalescences abilities also depend on Humility (because it might remove the abilities).
      This is called a "dependency loop" and it can happen under the layer system too, but very rarely. Basically it's resolved by ignoring those dependencies and going back to timestamp order.

    • @isaacking1524
      @isaacking1524 11 місяців тому +2

      It would certainly be possible to design a better layer system that had fewer unintuitive results, but it's not trivial, and it's not important enough to Wizards for them to dedicate any effort towards.

    • @isaacking1524
      @isaacking1524 11 місяців тому +4

      @@sy-py That's not correct, the whole point of applying effects in a specific order is that there's always a well-defined end result. The only way in which the order matters is that it changes what that result is and whether it's one that humans will find intuitive.

  • @kitsovereign4127
    @kitsovereign4127 11 місяців тому +10

    The one thing I'd wish you'd touched on is *why* the layers are that order. Magus of the Moon + Humility make it confusing why you apply types before abilities, but it's easy to understand with Rise from the Grave + Death Baron. Layers are meant to provide intuitive answers for common scenarios, and definitive answers for tricky scenarios.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +2

      That sounds like something for another video for sure. I only have a few examples where the game breaks if the order of Layers are changed. It's been brought up a couple of times, will definitely keep this in mind :)

    • @ShinkuDragon
      @ShinkuDragon 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@attackoncardboardreally in the end changing the order will "fix" some interactions, but create a problem backwards somewhere else. So in the end SOME cards have to lose.

    • @Fuzzi999
      @Fuzzi999 11 місяців тому +2

      I'm still left questioning if a new nonbasic gets put into play after humility is out.
      Magus has no ability, will the new land put into play remain what it is or will it become a mountain

    • @ganondorc8546
      @ganondorc8546 11 місяців тому +5

      @@Fuzzi999 I think it's still a mountain by my interpretation of the video - every time the board state is checked, you would apply the layers in order again, and so magus's would still be locked in despite another land entering.

    • @ganondorc8546
      @ganondorc8546 11 місяців тому +2

      I think a better way to explain why the layers are in the order they are is to just think about why they'd be messed up if they weren't in that order. Like, how could you remove an ability from a creature if you didn't even know whether it was a creature or not (abilities layer being after the type layer makes sense here). Or, can I change the color of a permanent I control if I don't know whether I control it or not (control has to be a super early layer, of course)?

  • @koalafridge4170
    @koalafridge4170 11 місяців тому +52

    What happens if two cards with continuous effects on the same layer that aren’t dependent on the other come into play at the same time. For example, say you cast a Brilliant Restoration that returns both Levitation and Mystic Decree from your graveyard to the battlefield at the same time. Would creatures you control have or not have flying?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +63

      I'm glad you brought this up, as I didnt have time to add this to the video as it was already long enough 😅 APNAP actually takes over.
      613.7m If two or more objects would receive a timestamp simultaneously, such as by entering a zone simultaneously or becoming attached simultaneously, their relative timestamps are determined in APNAP order (see rule 101.4). Objects controlled by the active player (or owned by the active player, if they have no controller) have an earlier relative timestamp in the order of that player’s choice, followed by each other player in turn order.

    • @koalafridge4170
      @koalafridge4170 11 місяців тому +34

      Oh wow so in this case the person reanimating both of these enchantments would just get to choose which “comes in first”/has an earlier timestamp and thus would get to choose whether all of their creatures will have or not have flying?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +36

      Yup, if they both come into play under the same persons control, they would get to choose the order 🙂

    • @bariltrailette
      @bariltrailette 11 місяців тому +1

      Instead like leyline of the void and blightsteel colossus you chose if blightsteel return to the deck or no that instead is a remplacement effect and dont touch the graveyard.

    • @elenna_alexia
      @elenna_alexia 11 місяців тому +1

      @@koalafridge4170 this makes sense, since you also get to order triggers that occur simultaneously under your control.

  • @jarrybryant718
    @jarrybryant718 11 місяців тому +2

    Thank you so much for making this video:)

  • @jmbw4271
    @jmbw4271 11 місяців тому

    Really clear explanation. thanks!

  • @moocowp4970
    @moocowp4970 10 місяців тому +6

    This is a great guide, but it's gonna be really hard to remember during a guide (particularly remembering the actual layers). It's obviously one thing for a judge to come in afterwards, check the rules, and say how something should work, it's another thing to think on the spot of how the interactions will work before you make your move. You'd have to study for this haha.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому +2

      It's not something that comes up too often, but it's good to know that this exists and is something to keep in the back of your mind :)

  • @0321Dave
    @0321Dave 10 місяців тому +1

    Your channel is amazing! Thank you for these videos. This should be required viewing for all mtg players

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому

      If there's anything else you would like to know, just ask :)

  • @polloshi
    @polloshi 11 місяців тому +5

    I feel like you're doing most things right and it's just time until a weird rule pops up in tournament/for a popular streamer and you end up exploding in popularity. Which I hope you do, cus I love this channel

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +4

      Thanks 😊 I had that happen with March of the Machines 😅 I went from 300 to 1k subs very quickly. I noticed that nobody was talking about an interesting rules changes (tokens can now transform) and decided to talk about it and it's implications. Just need another one of those to happen 😂

  • @Dow9399
    @Dow9399 11 місяців тому +1

    Beautiful. Thanks 🎉

  • @oinkerbob2
    @oinkerbob2 2 місяці тому +6

    Fun fact: learning to operate within the stack at a Magic table helped me pick up the similar concept in my computer science classes. 🤓 Brilliant guide!

  • @alanparana6899
    @alanparana6899 11 місяців тому +2

    I don’t feel like dependencies were explained well enough in this video. I understand the subtlety and can infer, but everything else was so defined I feel dependency was left behind. None the less you’ve blown my mind after 10 years of casual magic, thanks for this video!
    Ohhh..it’s fairly clear. Blood moon works whether or not urborg is there, and Urborg depends on blood moons timestamp, therefor blood moon takes priority. It’s clear. Again, thanks for the video

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому

      That's it, you got it :)

    • @alanparana6899
      @alanparana6899 11 місяців тому +1

      @@attackoncardboard Truly thanks for this video. I remember my first year finding out about the stack..this brought me RIGHT BACK to that time. Great stuff.

    • @toddbussey5718
      @toddbussey5718 10 місяців тому

      > Urborg depends on blood moons timestamp
      Technically, it doesn't.
      The interaction is the same whether Blood Moon enters first or second.
      Before applying either effect in Later 4 we see if applying one would...
      - change the set of objects that the other would apply to...
      - change what the effect does to the set of objects it applies to...
      - cause the other effect to not exist
      if we were to apply Urborg first...
      - Blood Moon still applies to the same set of objects
      - Blood Moon still makes those objects Mountains
      - Blood Moon still has its effect
      but...
      if we were to apply Blood Moon first...
      - Urborg wouldn't have any abilities and its effect hasn't been applied yet so Blood Moon would remove the existence of Urborg's effect therefore dependency
      as a result Urborg has to wait for Blodd Moon to apply and once it does Urborg has no ability and no effect.

  • @TheBroLuke
    @TheBroLuke 11 місяців тому +2

    THANK YOU!

  • @d4N137SC
    @d4N137SC 11 місяців тому +1

    Really great, you need more subs!

  • @DigitalAndInnovation
    @DigitalAndInnovation 11 місяців тому +1

    1:40- this is the perfect use of the Will emoji!

  • @GBH420
    @GBH420 10 місяців тому +1

    Well done. Thanks.

  • @evdoke1
    @evdoke1 11 місяців тому +1

    Great video, and a great explanation! You should do one for replacement effects too; those can be tricky to understand.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      Who let you read my scripts folder?! 😂 It wont be the next one as that video is already 90% complete but maybe the one after that :)

  • @jackkelley9657
    @jackkelley9657 11 місяців тому +1

    Gained a sub from me. Been playing for over a decade and this is the best breakdown I've seen.

  • @laedarian
    @laedarian 10 місяців тому +1

    I really enjoy the subtle music in the background especially the song from Zelda. Also great video! But I'm still confused as a new-ish player and will probably always be, magic is hard!

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому

      Feel free to let me know what you're confused on and I'm happy to try and explain again in the comments 🙂

  • @Skeithalot
    @Skeithalot 10 місяців тому +1

    Great explanation.

  • @Cabrito11
    @Cabrito11 11 місяців тому +2

    This music from ape escape 1 almost made me cry of joy/sadness becaiuse of my age

  • @magusofthebargain
    @magusofthebargain 11 місяців тому

    Now that we understand the Layers, Timestamps, and Dependencies rulings, we can speculate that there might be a time when the rules committee decides to simplify the rules and do away with the counterintuitive Layers rules, leaving us only with Timestamps and Dependencies. Furthermore, Dependencies may not be necessary any more either, since they create an unnecessary complication in the rules system, leaving us only with Timestamps, APNAP, and the choice of the controller to apply effects to break ties. This would be the simplest version of the rules. But for now, I recommend learning the rules as they are and then relearning them when they change. I say "when" and not "if" because damage used to use the stack, interrupts used to exist, and the Legend rule has changed many times. Thanks again for making this clarification video, which I will now watch again.

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому +2

      Layers are unlikely to go. There used to be a time when only timestamps existed, and let me tell you, it was capital c confusing

    • @isaacking1524
      @isaacking1524 11 місяців тому +2

      @magusofthebargain I would encourage you to spend a while thinking about the consequences of those changes. Look up some cards with continuous effects and ask yourself what the result would be with no layers and no dependencies. You may be surprised. ;)

  • @joem8507
    @joem8507 11 місяців тому

    Fantastic guide. Can you elaborate more on dependencies. How blood moon interacts with Urborg.

  • @smeatar
    @smeatar 5 місяців тому

    I feel like I have learnt all this stuff like 5 separate times over the years but then it comes up so rarely that I forget it all by the time it is relevant again

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  5 місяців тому

      Practise makes perfect. The only reason I remember it all is because I made this video 😂

  • @martinwood744
    @martinwood744 10 місяців тому +5

    8:08 You say that if a dependency exists, you always apply the DEPENDENT effect first. Then in the following example you apply the effect on which the dependent effect depends (Blood Moon's effect) first.

  • @Dnallohes
    @Dnallohes 11 місяців тому +2

    On one hand: excellent information. Truly useful. On the other hand: the title suggests that knowing this makes layers easy, and doesn't address the one thing that makes layers hard: there's so d*** many of them!

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому

      I mean, not really. Just seven, plus some sublayers

    • @Dnallohes
      @Dnallohes 11 місяців тому +1

      @@sy-py I’m glad seven’s not a lot to you. Without some pretty significant effort, I won’t be able to remember even what’s on the list, much less what order they occur in.

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому

      @@Dnallohes How much effort did it take you to memorize what order days of the week go in?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      When you edit a 10 minute layers video for 3 days straight, they stick after that 😂

    • @justseffstuff3308
      @justseffstuff3308 2 місяці тому

      @@sy-py I mean, about three years lol. I was three when I started really being able to talk fluently and six when I started being able to consistently get days of the week right.
      And days of the week are something that're used daily. You'll find a practical use for layers in VERY few games, and that's provided you play magic on a very frequent basis.
      Also, days of the week are learned at a very early age, and are dependent on many other things such as knowledge of time, so it's not a comparison that works. You seem like the kind of person who's too dependent on basic assumptions/"common sense" and prior learning, and less on present cognitive thought- there's not anything wrong with that, both methods have similar end results usually, but it's something to keep in mind when communicating with others.
      It's hard to find a good analog for the layers- I would say "phone numbers", since that's also remembering a sequence of 7 things, but on the other hand, numbers are much easier to memorize than complex subjects like "abilities" or "control" or "type".

  • @bigredmonster19
    @bigredmonster19 10 місяців тому +1

    The ape escape music ties it all together

  • @TroppoZump
    @TroppoZump 11 місяців тому +1

    WOW I never knew this was a rhing at all. Thank you so much!

  • @highlander7462
    @highlander7462 11 місяців тому +1

    Love the Ape Escape track.

  • @Sejotobi
    @Sejotobi 10 місяців тому

    This was actually VERY informative holy shit.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому

      Hope you enjoyed it :) If there are any other rules you need a hand with let me know 😀

  • @beatdownerz
    @beatdownerz 11 місяців тому

    Got it, thanks.

  • @Timbobs
    @Timbobs 11 місяців тому +1

    I can’t wait for the “explaining where all these cards came from” video! That must have some complicated layers as wel…

  • @theparagonal
    @theparagonal 11 місяців тому +1

    A+ for Ape Escape music

  • @FlowBerni
    @FlowBerni 11 місяців тому +1

    niice guide bro!

  • @Constrictor_Victor
    @Constrictor_Victor 11 місяців тому +4

    Gotta say, great presentation very clear and concise... but I think I'll just do my best to avoid these cards going forward. Gives me real pole position vibes from Yu-Gi-Oh.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +2

      Complicated layers states don't come up too often, but if you're playing cards like Darksteel Mutation or Humble (effects that remove abilities) effects, it's always good to know how they interact with other permanents, especially Commander :)

  • @lukaurbankitek6019
    @lukaurbankitek6019 11 місяців тому +1

    You are a legend

  • @MrSehiz
    @MrSehiz 21 день тому +1

    thanks alot

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  21 день тому

      Hope this helped! I'll be remaking this video this year! 😀

  • @sampedro9316
    @sampedro9316 11 місяців тому

    I've been playing for years and never knew about these rules.

  • @sapphoai821
    @sapphoai821 3 місяці тому +1

    Thanks

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  3 місяці тому

      Hope it helped. I'll be redoing this video this year, so if you have any questions, let me know 😀

  • @humboldtdoomer866
    @humboldtdoomer866 11 місяців тому +2

    There absolutely needs to be a Shrek crossover!

  • @kingvire
    @kingvire 11 місяців тому

    I’m a literal idiot and understand things way better when told and laid out like this. I will retain this so much more than other bs but just in case I’ve saved the video so I can always find it again. I appreciate the helped watched tons of videos about layers as I wanna judge but I can’t wrap my head around it this helped a ton even though I’m sure it will get mixed up later.
    I do wanna ask if you could add any additional information about dependencies cause I don’t understand how exactly the urborg or sliver was dependent on the blood moon or humility respectively.

  • @chapmanandchapmanproductio974
    @chapmanandchapmanproductio974 21 день тому +1

    Omg this is great !! U have no idea what any of those are !!!! Wooooo

  • @KingQuetzal
    @KingQuetzal 11 місяців тому +2

    Does the example at 5:24 with Magus, Non-Basic, and Humility apply to subsequent non-basic lands played. Do they enter as mountains?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +2

      Layers are constantly checked, updated and applied. With Magus of the Moon and Humility in play. Non-basic lands will still enter as Mountains.

  • @collectorofthecards-vh5wd
    @collectorofthecards-vh5wd 11 місяців тому +2

    I been playing mtg for 5 years now and I didn't even know "layers" existed as an official thing like this, dang.

  • @vkaeru9692
    @vkaeru9692 10 місяців тому +1

    Great video ! What happens in the magus/command tower/humility example if the magus is removed from the battlefield ? Does the lands in play staying Mountains as far as they stay on the bf ?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому

      Layers are constantly checked, updated and applied. Any time anything happens the "layer program" runs.
      When Magus leaves the battlefield, so does their effect 🙂

  • @jonw8697
    @jonw8697 11 місяців тому +3

    Im curious about the first example does that mean that every subsequent land that came into play after the humility are its regular land time since Magus of the Moon lost its ability? Or are the layers essentially constantly reapplying every time something is done?

    • @patmacrotch5611
      @patmacrotch5611 11 місяців тому +2

      Someone correct me if I am wrong, but the lands would be mountains. Time stamps only apply when determining which layer applies first. Playing a Strip Mine for example, it doesn’t have anything that is on the same layer as Magus’s effect.
      If you had a creature that had the ability “all non basic lands are swamps” and you played that with Magus on the field, then all non basic lands would be swamps because the magus would be applied first then the “swamp creature” would be applied next, making all non basic lands swamps. (I made up a creature for this example)

    • @isaacking1524
      @isaacking1524 11 місяців тому +1

      The layers are constantly applying; continuous effects do what the name implies and apply continuously. Any new lands will be Mountains.

  • @Red_Mag3
    @Red_Mag3 11 місяців тому +3

    For other rules, I understand linked abilities and how they only reference the other ability they're tied to, but it should make logical sense that you could use the second part of a linked ability if you were able to otherwise fulfill its condition.
    Here's an example:
    Kheru Mind-Eater equipped with Kaldra Compleat that exiles another creature with combat damage should allow you to play the exiled card.
    It doesn't because of the rule on linked abilities, eventhough it makes sense to allow it if you read both cards.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +7

      Ooo nice. I think I was kind of aware of this rule, just purely down to how many games I've played, but I would have never of known it was called "Linked Abilities". This looks like some good night time reading!

    • @ganondorc8546
      @ganondorc8546 11 місяців тому +1

      607.5 for anybody else reading this:
      "
      If an object acquires a pair of linked abilities as part of the same effect, the abilities will be similarly linked to one another on that object even though they weren’t printed on that object. They can’t be linked to any other ability, regardless of what other abilities the object may currently have or may have had in the past.
      Example:
      _Arc-Slogger has the ability “{R}, Exile the top ten cards of your library: Arc-Slogger deals 2 damage to any target.” Sisters of Stone Death has the ability “{B}{G}: Exile target creature blocking or blocked by Sisters of Stone Death” and the ability “{2}{B}: Put a creature card exiled with Sisters of Stone Death onto the battlefield under your control.” Quicksilver Elemental has the ability “{U}: Quicksilver Elemental gains all activated abilities of target creature until end of turn.” If a player has Quicksilver Elemental gain Arc-Slogger’s ability, activates it, then has Quicksilver Elemental gain Sisters of Stone Death’s abilities, activates the exile ability, and then activates the return-to-the-battlefield ability, only the creature card Quicksilver Elemental exiled with Sisters of Stone Death’s ability can be returned to the battlefield. Creature cards Quicksilver Elemental exiled with Arc-Slogger’s ability can’t be returned._
      "
      yeah, I agree that's silly, seems like it's actively working against good deck building

  • @pryocrazy
    @pryocrazy 11 місяців тому

    In the example you gave with magus of the moon and humility, wouldnt it only keep the lands as mountains until the next time the board state was checked? if my opponent plays MotM, and i play Humility, all my non basic lands would be mountains by the end of the stack, but when i play a new non basic land, MotM would have no abilities, so the new land would not be a mountain, and because his effect was checked it would reset all my non-basics?
    Follow up question (assuming that im correct in my previous assumption) wouldnt me playing anything/changing phases check the board and change all my non-basic lands back to what they were, so the effect of having only mountains would only really effect my next card play in that phase?

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому

      The layers don't loop around. They start with each card's printed text and go down, layer by layer.

  • @kineticcat5557
    @kineticcat5557 10 місяців тому

    I think part of the confusion comes from the fact that continuous effects aren't always actually continuous.
    In Magic, continuous effects are any effects that "modifies characteristics of objects, modifies control of objects, or affects players or the rules of the game, for a fixed or indefinite period."
    This, unintuitively, includes things like Oko's +1 ability, despite the fact that there is nothing continuous about it in the English sense of the word.

  • @Roll-Penut
    @Roll-Penut 11 місяців тому

    Question: why does the ability adding/removing effect not stop humility or opalescence from giving power/toughness since it applies in layer 6 and the power/toughness applies in layer 7?

    • @siosilvar
      @siosilvar 11 місяців тому +1

      You finish applying the rest of an effect if you start applying any part of it. Rule 613.6

  • @ducktheseraph
    @ducktheseraph 11 місяців тому +2

    Oooooh that Ape Escape music just hitting.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +2

      Absolutely love Ape Escape. You can hear my childhood in all these videos. Music and SFX are all from my favourite games 😁

  • @petrri323
    @petrri323 Місяць тому +2

    In the example given with command tower, would a non-basic played into this board state become a mountain? Or would it remain as a non-basic with all of its effects because Magus of the Moon no longer has an ability?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  Місяць тому +1

      Any time anything happens, (changing phases, playing a land, casting a spell etc) the Layers "program" is ran and checked. If Magus is in play, the Command Tower *will* enter as a Mountain.

  • @AamariWilliams
    @AamariWilliams 11 місяців тому +1

    Just for my own clarification, in the Magus of the Moon example with Humility, if another non-basic land is played while both Magus and Humility are on board, does the the land still enter as a "mountain" or as whatever it is now that Humility is blanking Magus?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +2

      Layers are constantly checked, updated and applied. With Magus of the Moon and Humility in play. Non-basic lands will still enter as Mountains :)

    • @AamariWilliams
      @AamariWilliams 11 місяців тому +1

      @@attackoncardboard somehow I missed the constantly checked. Duh lol

  • @leovalenzuela8368
    @leovalenzuela8368 11 місяців тому +1

    I learned something.

  • @edhdeckbuilding
    @edhdeckbuilding 11 місяців тому +2

    first off. great video, i actually learned alot.
    second. the fact that nonbasic lands are mountains with magus and humility in play really makes no sense. i know that's the rule but i don't like it. it's counter-intuitive.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому

      Glad you enjoyed it ☺️
      I'm likely to do a follow up on this video and see if I can find some interactions that will break the game if Layers aren't followed as layed out.

  • @adriangar95
    @adriangar95 11 місяців тому

    The background remember me to Smosh

  • @hexproof44
    @hexproof44 11 місяців тому

    I guess this is the video i needed to answer a question about the interaction between Geist of Saint Traft, Annoited Procession and Divine visitation. So i attack with geist, place angel 4/4 attacking, Annoited procession triggers and I play another angel... Divine visitation simply adds vigilance to those Angels which i will have to exile at the end of combat. Is my understanding correct?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому

      So you attack with Geist and get a trigger that *would* put a tapped and attacking Angels. Instead you get 2 tapped and attacking Angels that now have vigilance (they'll still be tapped). You'll then exile them both at end of combat.

  • @Daniel-es8rz
    @Daniel-es8rz 10 місяців тому

    Thank you for the video. Super informative, concise and helpful. The layer rule is clear. Im curious as to why the layers are ordered numerically and the philosophy behind each layer's 'number'.
    Maybe Copy first as to define conditional 'if' interaction spells and the legendary rule. Control perhaps logically follows to line up with Upkeep phase/damage logics/"its controller" effects. The first two layers seem to set the stage for how those cards can interact with players and the game state in layers 3-7.
    Guess aside, are there resources available that give insight to this rule philosophy in MTG or in general game design?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому +1

      An interesting interaction to think about if Layers 1 and 2 were swapped:
      I cast Copy Enchantment on your Mind Control.
      If the Layers were swapped, I wouldn't gain control of one of your creatures.

    • @Daniel-es8rz
      @Daniel-es8rz 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@attackoncardboard​Damn, interesting! Thank you for the quick response and your time. Your video has invigorated a desire to learn and explore more about this

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому +1

      While the Layers aren't intuitive at first glance, they've ensured that all cards across 30 years just simply work without massive changes to the rules each time a new set comes out.
      I don't have the exact answer as to why it is the way it is, I just know it breaks the game if it's not 😅

  • @David-km3fx
    @David-km3fx 11 місяців тому

    Thank you for the video, I didn't know about the layers system!
    I have a question regarding the Humility/Opalescence interaction at 6:33 though: By the time Humility's effect is being applied in Layer 6 it has already become a creature. As its effect states "All creatures..." wouldn't it be dependent on itself? It seems to me like a paradoxical situation in which it would lose its ability only if it keeps its ability... if that makes sense.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому

      While in the video, I explained that Layers are applied step by step, they're technically applied all at once, at the same time. So Humility will end up being a 1/1 creature with no abilities (with Opalescence in play) but this is only after the layers are applied.

  • @arebalwithacause
    @arebalwithacause 10 місяців тому

    In the magus of the moon/humility example once that resolves what happens if someone plays a nonbasic land on the next turn? Since Magus of the moon now has no abilities now would just this nonbasic not be a mountain?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому

      Layers are constantly checked, updated and applied. Any time anything happens, the "Layers Program" gets run, so when a new land ETB, if it's non-basic, it will be a Mountain.

    • @arebalwithacause
      @arebalwithacause 10 місяців тому +1

      @@attackoncardboard hm that's so interesting. Thanks for the reply!

  • @rav5373
    @rav5373 10 місяців тому +1

    Man, when you lay it out like that, layers actually sound quite simple.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому

      😁 glad to hear it made sense. I'll be looking to do a follow up video in the near future. So if you're still unsure about anything, let me know 🙂

  • @MageSkeleton
    @MageSkeleton 11 місяців тому

    Very good video, very enlightening video. i would had thought Dress Down would shut down Magus of the Moon so lands can tap for their non basic abilities. But apparently not.
    Would you be up to explain Slicer, hired muscle? and/or Assault Suit? More specifically the types of things you can equip onto the creature and who benefits from any triggers?

    • @isaacking1524
      @isaacking1524 11 місяців тому

      I'd be happy to answer your question, but I'm not sure what it is. Any equipment can be attached to Slicer, Hired Muscle unless it says otherwise. Changing control of Slicer doesn't change what's attached to it, nor does it change the controller of those Equipment.

  • @rionnachelliot8951
    @rionnachelliot8951 11 місяців тому +3

    by the dependency rule you describe wouldn't that make magus of the moon turn off and return nonbasics to their original form? Since the static effect will no longer be in play because of humility? Or have I missed something significant? Sort of like how if we had an Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite a humility won't kill my creatures because they are turned to 1/1 at the same time as EN's -2/-2 debuff ability is turned off.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      Timestamps and Dependencies only come into play when we're looking at Effects trying to be applied in the *same* layer.
      Magus works on Layer 4 (Type) and Humility works on Layer 6 (Abilities) and 7 (Power and Toughness) :)

    • @marshallscot
      @marshallscot 5 місяців тому

      ​@attackoncardboard I don't think that answers his question. I think he's confused over the logical inconsistency of the ability not being there anymore, yet still applying. Logically, the continuous effect of Magus of the Moon should be checked for continuously. Like if we destroy the Magus, the effect goes away no?

    • @psymar
      @psymar 2 місяці тому

      ​@@marshallscotThe effect changes other cards, before the effect is removed from the card it's on. this does not undo the changes to the other cards.

  • @jordyneves7089
    @jordyneves7089 Місяць тому +1

    I have a question about the incarnations, what's wonder/anger timestap?
    When it goes to the graveyard?
    What if the player does not control the corresponding land type and plays one later?
    What if the land is blinked, does it get a new timestamp?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  Місяць тому +1

      Per the rulings for those cards, it's set when the card first enters the graveyard. It doesn't care if you control the land or not.
      "The timestamp for the "in your graveyard" ability is set at the time that this card goes to your graveyard, regardless of whether you control a Mountain at that time. "
      Hope that clears things up for you ☺️

  • @deadlineuniverse3189
    @deadlineuniverse3189 10 місяців тому +1

    As a Yugioh player, on the one hand, I find it stupid that removing an continuous effect doesn’t remove its application once applied, but on the other hand have to remind myself that if that non-basic land would have an effect to make every enchantment a 1/1 creature that looses all abilities you would look at an infinite state change without player interaction that’s unresolvable without the layers rule. (We have some issues with these , doesn’t really come up often but once some people found a bad card named pole position that could trigger those infinite game states pretty reliably which in end result prevented the opponent from ever playing a card since it was illegal to make a move in Yugioh that would result in an unresolvable game state, until they mended the ruling)

  • @Otavio899
    @Otavio899 3 місяці тому

    Hello!
    What happens if I cast an Sudden Spoiling in my opponent attack step while they have a equipped creature with multiple abilities by many equipments, like lifelink and deathtouch (basilisk collar), trample and +2/+2 (rancor), etc?
    If I understand correctly, my opponent creature loses all abilities, but still have +2/+2 buff. Can you help me with that doubt?
    Thank you very much!

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  3 місяці тому +1

      You'd be correct. We have both a layers and a Timestamp situation here.
      The equipments that *add abilities* and the Sudden Spoiling's *lose abilities* and Rancor's *gain* trample all take place on Layer 6. When two effects happen at the same Layer, we look to Timestamps (and dependencies). SS has the most recent timestamp, so it's applied last. Interestingly, if you attached the equipment to a new creature, after SS was cast, it would gain the equipment's ability. Equipping creates a new Timestamp (for that specific equipment).
      SS's *power setting* ability happens at Layer 7b and Rancor's *power increase* ability happens at 7c. So we apply them top to bottom. 7B first then 7C 🙂
      I hope that makes sense 😃

    • @Otavio899
      @Otavio899 3 місяці тому

      ​@@attackoncardboard Thank you for the explanation!

  • @cogdill20
    @cogdill20 11 місяців тому

    very informative video! could you give me a little bit tougher example of a dependency? I think I understand it but just want to make sure.

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому +1

      My Archetype of Imagination is enchatned by Darksteel Mutation. Does my Grizzly Bear have flying? Why or why not?

  • @bernalilentejas7599
    @bernalilentejas7599 10 місяців тому

    Just a clarification on the Bloodmoon Urbog scenario, it was mentioned that Urbog's effect is dependent whether bloodmoon's effect is applied first, does that mean if bloodmoon was already in play and a turn later a player would play Urbog, lands will be swamps? TIA

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому

      Layers are constantly checked, updated and applied. When Urborg ETB, Layers will be check, the layers will see a dependency between Urborg and Blood Moon. So Blood Moon will be applied first and remove Urborgs ability :)

  • @Netro1992
    @Netro1992 11 місяців тому

    In the blood moon example, what happens when the magus dies? As per application of the rules. Intuitively, they would stop being mountains, but given at that point the magus doesn't have the ability, what part of the rules would change the board state so ghat the lands would stop being mountains. Or am I wrong and those lands will remain mountains?

    • @siosilvar
      @siosilvar 11 місяців тому +2

      The game recalculates continuous effects "continually and automatically". Once Magus is no longer there to provide the layer 4 type-changing effect, it goes away, and all lands go back to normal.

  • @kevinbaudin9557
    @kevinbaudin9557 11 місяців тому

    What happens if there are 2 Opalescence and 1 Humility? Both Opalescence set their types to Creature, then humility says they are 1/1 without abilities, then Opalescence cant set p/t to 4/4 because of dependency, right?

  • @Nienna_Asyare
    @Nienna_Asyare 10 місяців тому +1

    8:37 so I’m slightly confused here, is Blood Moon turning nonbasic lands into basic red (mountains) lands? And since they’re basic, they don’t have abilities?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  10 місяців тому +1

      Blood Moon turns Non-basic lands into Non-basic Mountains.
      Mountains only have the ability "Tap: Add R"

  • @Varler_
    @Varler_ 11 місяців тому +1

    If there was a Magus of the Moon and Humility out and then someone played a non-basic land would that land still be a Mountain? Or would it enter as a non-basic land since the Magus no longer has that ability?
    (IE, does Magus still have its ability active but hidden under Humility or is it gone but the damage was already done so it only applied to old lands?)

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      Layers are constantly checked, updated applied. When anything happens the "Layers Program" is run. So any new Non-basic lands will be Mountains

    • @Varler_
      @Varler_ 11 місяців тому +2

      @@attackoncardboard Awesome, thanks for the answer! 😁

  • @alphonse2234
    @alphonse2234 10 місяців тому

    What layer is Riding the Dilu Horse applied in?

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 10 місяців тому +1

      It gives horsemanship at layer 6 and +2/+2 on layer 7c

  • @JRPKeller
    @JRPKeller 11 місяців тому

    In the Magus of the Moon/Humility example...what happens when I play another non-basic land? Does it become a mountain or not?

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому

      It does. Continuous effects are evaluated top to bottom constantly.

  • @The_Gestan
    @The_Gestan 10 місяців тому

    Official ruling for ppl who are curious:
    - "If Magus of the Moon loses its abilities, it continues to turn nonbasic lands into Mountains. This is because effects that change subtypes are applied before considering effects that remove abilities, regardless of the order in which those effects started."

  • @chapmanandchapmanproductio974
    @chapmanandchapmanproductio974 21 день тому +1

    Yes I would have no idea

  • @dariokupper471
    @dariokupper471 6 місяців тому +1

    So does the 'locking in' mean that any continuous effect from layers 1-5 will never be affected by an ability removing effect? So something like Darksteel Mutation just doesn't do anything to deal with Magus of the Moon?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  6 місяців тому +1

      Correct. Layers above can't be affected by layers below.
      Song of the Dryads is one of the few continuous effects that can stop Magus. It comes into play at L4.

    • @dariokupper471
      @dariokupper471 6 місяців тому

      @@attackoncardboard Very interesting, thank you!

  • @wilsoncrunch1330
    @wilsoncrunch1330 11 місяців тому

    Due to timestamps will the new lands played after Magus of the Moon has been changed by Humility now keep their original form and only the lands that were in effect before stay as mountains.

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому +1

      Nope, new lands will still be mountains.

  • @Slayer309
    @Slayer309 11 місяців тому

    what would happend to nonbasics entering after humility makes a blank 1/1 out of the magus? because he has no ability it would not change nonbasics that enter afterwards, right ?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому

      Layers are constantly being checked, updated and applied. So when a new land comes into play. The Layers "program" runs, and it will apply the layers list to the card where appropriate.
      So yes, new lands will ETB as Mountains (with Magus and Humility in play) :)

  • @origaminosferatu3357
    @origaminosferatu3357 11 місяців тому +1

    Fun Fact I used to play Darksteel Garrison in my Horobi EDH deck. That was the only time I've ever seen it being played.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому

      I feel like that's a Black Lotus moment. I've actually seen a Black Lotus in person, but never a Darksteel Garrison 😂

    • @Timbobs
      @Timbobs 11 місяців тому

      I’ve got it in my Baru, Fist of Krosa EDH deck, because I like weird cards that almost never work, and it has a lot of land animation.

  • @shutupandlisten1075
    @shutupandlisten1075 11 місяців тому +3

    4:50 what happens if you then remove magus of the moon? It has no ability so removing it should leave the command tower a mountain, but that just doesnt seem right.

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +2

      Continuous Effects are constantly checked and applied. Any time any action is taken, the game runs through the Layers list. If Magus gets removed, the Layers "Program" gets run again, but this time there's no Magus effect to apply at Layer 4, so non-basic lands will go back to normal :)

    • @CloudsSword
      @CloudsSword 11 місяців тому

      @@attackoncardboard How does the Magus work with a card like Witness Protection? Since Magus is Layer 4 and Witness Protection is Layer 6 would that not mean that there is no way at all to remove the Magus effect since any effect that would remove the magus ability would ALWAYS happen AFTER (layer 6) the Magus already changes non-basics to mountains (layer 4)? (I'm ignoring the Layer 7 P/T changes as they're not relevant to the question I assume)

    • @isaacking1524
      @isaacking1524 11 місяців тому

      @@CloudsSword WItness Protection removes abilities the same way Humility does, so it doesn't affect Magus of the Moon making things Mountains.
      I'm not sure what you mean by "no way at all to remove the Magus's effect", but in general that's not the case. For example, you could turn it into a copy of a vanilla creature using True Polymorph. Or you could turn it into a Mountain itself with Ashaya, Spreading Seas, and Trait Doctoring!

  • @chrisvainio
    @chrisvainio 11 місяців тому +1

    Do new lands coming in after Magus of the Moon loses abilities still become mountains, or just pre existing?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      Layers are constantly being checked, updated and applied. So when a new land comes into play. The Layers "program" runs, and it will apply the layers list to the card where appropriate.
      So yes, new lands will ETB as Mountains (with Magus and Humility in play) :)

  • @ReinOfCats
    @ReinOfCats 11 місяців тому

    This makes me think of the card "Infinite Reflection" and its kind of busy text-box.
    If the card was reduced to something like "Each other nontoken creature you control is a copy of enchanted creature", then it sounds like it wouldn't actually affect creatures that are under your control only due to control effects (noting that Copy comes before the Control layer). Do I have that right?
    I'm guessing that's why the card is structured to have control be checked only at very specific moments (on trigger). Though, I wonder why those two layers are ordered in that way. What would be the implications if they were flipped?

    • @isaacking1524
      @isaacking1524 11 місяців тому +1

      That's correct!
      If layers 1 and 2 were swapped, what would happen if you played Copy Enchantment and copied Control Magic? :)

  • @Londrino
    @Londrino 11 місяців тому

    Are layers checked continuously? In the first example what happens when another land is played, is it still changed to a mountain?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +1

      Layers are constantly checked, updated and applied.
      With Magus/Humility, all nonbasic lands present and future are Mountains until Magus is dealt with 🙂

  • @mackinzie
    @mackinzie 11 місяців тому

    Can you explain the interaction of leonin shikari, syr gwyn, and argentum armor being passed between attacking knights?

    • @isaacking1524
      @isaacking1524 11 місяців тому +1

      You're only going to get one Argentum Armor trigger and one Syr Gwyn trigger. All attackers are declared at the same time, and that's when "whenever a creature attacks" triggers trigger. Moving the Argentum Armor after the creatures have already attacked won't make them attack again.

    • @mackinzie
      @mackinzie 11 місяців тому +1

      @isaacking1524 I think my misunderstanding came from the difference between "attacking" and "attacks" your explanation makes sense.

  • @yaza862
    @yaza862 11 місяців тому

    when this video appeared i had just talked a few days earlier to a friend starting magic how layers were the most complicated rule in MTG XD. Also if humility's on the board before magus of the moon, does magus of the moon still "have time" to apply his effect ? The only thing i can think of is if layers "resolve" when states are being checked and state based actions take place

    • @sy-py
      @sy-py 11 місяців тому +1

      Layers don't resolve, they apply constantly. And yes, Magus still applies his effect

  • @ackbooh9032
    @ackbooh9032 11 місяців тому

    What does locking the layer mean? Does it mean that any result or value set in a previous layer cannot be changed by ulterior layers? Thank you.
    Example: I have a Wolrath deck and have always applied +1+1 counter on Wolrath on top of setting his values to a 7/5 because I thought subsequent layers modify what was before. Is this wrong?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  11 місяців тому +2

      When we start applying all the continuous effects, we apply them in order of the layers list from top to bottom. Once we apply the effect, any subsequent layers cannot remove or change their effect.
      With Volrath's ability, his P/T setting ability happens in Layer 7b.
      Counters come into effect at Layer 7c.
      So he becomes a 7/5, then his P/T gets modified by counters.

    • @ackbooh9032
      @ackbooh9032 11 місяців тому +2

      @@attackoncardboard Thanks a lot! Great video by the way!

  • @entropy840
    @entropy840 4 місяці тому +2

    I think you should remake this video: my smooth brain can't understand. In any situation, one card is going to be played before another. I know you addressed timestamps but in every situation, it would help if you gave an example of what would happen if one card was played before another (i.e. if bloodmoon was played and humility was one the battlefield, or if humility was played and bloodmoon was on the bf, etc.).

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  4 місяці тому +1

      Remaking this video is 100% on my to-do list for this year 😀

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  4 місяці тому +1

      Assuming you're meaning Magus of the Moon, to answer your question, Time Stamps and dependants don't come into effect here because Magus and Humility happen on different layers.

  • @delliriumstrange9697
    @delliriumstrange9697 9 місяців тому +1

    Let’s say I have an Elesh Norn (-2/-2 to enemy creatures) in play before other player plays a Coat of Arms to buff his elves. The same player have 3 elves in play and make a 1/1 elf token, does the 1/1 token live?

    • @attackoncardboard
      @attackoncardboard  9 місяців тому

      Continuous Effects are applied all at the same time. So yes, the 1/1 would survive as it's getting +3/+3 and -2/-2