Відео

Exegesis and Eisegesis After versé 36 before thé World ''Look there Its written 16:33 and 10:47 Go read it

KJB ua-cam.com/video/8BJMksX4snA/v-deo.htmlsi=GaUfv02EbLcQ2EPs

...as did also the believing eunuch himself: and, immediately requesting to be baptized, he said, “I believe Jesus Christ to be the Son of God.” Irenaeus (130 - 202 CE), Against Heresies In the Acts of the Apostles: “Lo, here is water; what is there which hinders me from being baptized? Then said Philip, If you believe with all your heart, you may.” Cyprian (c. 200-258), Treatise 12, Book 3 Early writers seem to quote the first or second part of the verse. But then the verse was missing in the early manuscripts containing the majority of the Greek Greek New Testament, which are now accepted as critical. It then reappears in various translations from the 6th century, but then disappears again from most Greek manuscripts. To reappear in 16th century translations... and disappear again in modern translations. I think that verses which are missing from the critical codices, but for which there is sufficient attestation, should not be excluded, but placed in brackets, as is the good practice of many translations

It takes a lot of historical Bible keeping to understand that often throughout history parts migrate to other places or in some cases notes have been accidentally added to scripture

The Holy King James 1611 Bible is the Word of God, the Absolute Truthj, that will be kepy from this Generation forever.

The Word is there as "LORD"!!! MAY I ASK WHO IN THIS WORLD IS YOUR LORD??? IS HE YOUR GOD?? OR YOUR GOLF PARTNER!!!❤😊😊😊😊😊

I have followed Peter RUCKMAN FOR OVER 20 YEARS ,I HAVE BEEN READING THE BIBLE SINCE I WAS 7 YEARS OLD NOW AT 64 I HAVE FOUND NO OTHER PREACHER WHO WAS MORE CLEAR AND HONEST IN HIS PREACHING!!! IF ANYONE THINKS THE KJV IS NOT EMPOWERED BY THE TRUE GOD OF ABRAHAM AND AS A TRUE BELIEVER I KNOW IT IS,FOR NO OTHER BIBLE OR BOOK HAS BROUGHT MORE PEOPLE ON EARTH TO THEIR KNEE'S TO CRY OUT TO GOD FOR HELPAS THE TRUE EVIDENCE OF THE POWER WITHIN THE KJV WHICH CAN ONLY COME FROM THE TRUE GOD!!! FOR GOD'S HOLY SPIRIT DWELLS IN ALL "TRUE BELIEVERS" FOREVER!!! WHAT OTHER BOOK ON EARTH CAN EVER CLAIM IT????? NO OTHER!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊

The KJV is the most widely use and correct to understanding of the Truth!! We must accept All the Scripture in Correct Understanding of what and WHY GOD WANTS US TO UNDERSTAND HIS WAYS AND WHY HE DID WHAT HE DID AND WILL DO IN THE CURRENT AND FUTURE TIMES AHEAD!!! READ AND STUDY IT ALL FOR 2nd TIMOTHY 3:16 "ALL SCRIPTURE IS GIVEN FOR INSTRUCTIONS" WE ARE NEVER EVER TO CUT OUT,WHITE OUT,BLOT OUT ANYTHING,IF WE DUE GOD PROMISES TO BRING PROBLEM'S INTO OUR LIVES FOR CHANGING ANYTHING!!! THE KJV REVEALS AND ANSWERS THE QUESTION,"DO YOU WANT MORE OR LESS OF JESUS,OUR GOD IN THE FLESH!!!!!❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊

Focus on the Acts 2:38 gospel! Death burial and resurrection and not this “psycho babble”. Thats why your gone! It’s the gospel that we are called to share with the world! Rabbit trails and distractions!! Let it go and receive the Holy Ghost!

The KJV NEVER REMOVES JESUS IN SCRIPTURE YET ALL,ALL,ALL OTHER VERSIONS SUPPORT THE DEGRADING AND REMOVAL OF JESUS AS THE "SON OF GOD" AND DEGRADES THE DEITY OF JESUS!!! WHY DO YOU THINK ALL FALSE FAKE CORRUPT VERSIONS PUT FORTH THE EFFORT TO DO SO!❤

To Many False Statements here!!! First let's take the 1611 KJV, #2 1560 only Geneva,#3 Matthew Tyndale 1528,#4 1358 Wycliffe,#5 Original Greek English Lexicon,#6 Original Hebrew English Lexicon!!! NOW TAKE ALL THESE AND ANY WILL FIND 95 o/o MATCH!!! VERY AMAZING!!! NOW TAKE ANY OTHERS LIKE THE NKJV AND FOLLOW THE MONEY BACK TO THE PRINTERS AND BOARD MEMBERS YOU WILL FIND THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS INVESTED AND INFESTED AND DIRECTED THE PRINTING AND THE REMOVAL OF THE NAME AND SUPPORT OF JESUS THROUGHOUT THE BIBLE,ALL ROMAN CATHOLIC VERSIONS ARE CORRUPT,THE RSV,,THE TNIV,THE NIV,THE NASB,AND EVEN THE 1569 GENEVA ROME INVENTED BECAUSE THE "HATED" THE REVEALING TRUTH OF THE 1560 WHERE THE TRUTH IS IN THE 1560 AND ROME HATES TRUTH!!! YOU HAVE MANY FALSE STATEMENTS,LAY THEM ALL OUT ON A TABLE AND EVERYTHING ALIGNS WITH THE KJV1611 NO LIES JUST FACTS!!! IF YOU DESIRE TO SPEND THE THOUSAND'S OF HOURS AND YEARS READING AND STUDYING YOU WILL FIND THE TRUTH, I HAVE!! THERE IS NO OTHER MORE RELIABLE BIBLE AS THE KJV ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH,SO WHY READ AND STUDY ANYTHING ELSE???????❤😊😊😊😊

What was it that John said in Rev. about adding and removing? Think I would be wary of Gods curse.

Thanks for taking the time to share this information. A big question that I have: why do some of the New Testament quotes of the Septuagint not match the Masoretic Text which is translated into English bibles? For example Hebrews 8:9 quote of Jeremiah 31:32 which you have mentioned. How can we know what Jeremiah actually wrote? Regarding the belief that scripture is inerrant, this is a big stumbling block for me.

People who have lead an extreme life, tend to go to the opposite extremes when making a directional change.

Very informative.

I feel sorry for these people, especially those who clap hands because they are already deceived.

/37 [in Orthodox Study Bible] 'if you believe...&]'

How did Ruckman avoid the mental institutions of his day? Sounds like some form of delusion?

To those who will ‘hear’, don’t be deceived by all this so-called manuscript evidence that has been DISCOVERED later and supposedly is more accurate and in ‘xxx’ manuscripts. Stay with the AV the KJV and don’t argue nor debate those who want to change to whatever version they choose. Remember the apostle’s warnings about ‘…what will come and has already come’ in these last times. The Adversary’s next lines of attack surely must be to ‘stir’ the Lord’s sheep with many devices. Groups pretending to be “Christian” and are not! Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, Church of Christ doctrines, Moonies, Baptist church doctrines, New Age doctrines and beliefs and things taught in Calvary Chapel churches; and attacks on Bible versions, new “discoveries” of manuscripts found in this cave, in that movie theater; and so-called ‘scholars’ deciding that “…this was said by Jesus but ‘that’ wasn’t said…”; and attacking the Lord’s sheep with moving the sabbath Day from Saturday to Sunday; insisting NOT to follow the TEN COMMANDMENTS because we are not under a “…works trip…” (as some Bible teacher’s doctrine preaches; and we live on a ‘ball type ‘planet’ and NOT on a flat plain type earth that the ancients like Moses, Joshua, the Prophets and the King…even David…. ‘believed’ and understood and “believed” what the Lord GOD “said”…(and modernism and so-called science tell people better by using their ‘eyes’ rather than the WORD…remember Peter’s reminded us NOT to follow Eve’s error…”…we have a more ‘sure’ word of prophecy…”); and many many more arrows and slings that the Mighty and the Princes and the spirits aim and send at the Lord’s people. And they use the idols of wood and stone to deceive; and that awful god Mammon and his servants to deceive. But remember what our Lord said…”…my father’s hand gives to my hand and no one can take them out of my hand…”. The scriptures were once delivered to the people of God and the works were finished from the foundation of the world. Thus Genesis 2:1-2 is to be ‘believed’ and let not the ‘devices’ of the Adversary woo God’s sheep…God is faithful, thus “believe” and don’t’ doubt, like the teachers, scholars, seminaries, and other ‘tools’ and devices of the Powers and spirits. If you use the KJV then stay with it. If you use the other versions then stay with them. The Holy Spirit’s ministry is YOU!!! Don’t doubt and follow the ‘instructions’ of the Lord in his 3 year ministry to the House of Israel; and especially to Ephraim and his entire ‘camp’. Soon, those who attempt to ‘encourage’ and strengthen will be silenced…sadly from within. Remember Habakkuk’s admonition that those who are justified shall live be his faith. The faith given to you before the foundation of the world by covenant.

Cursed will be the that add or take away from the Bible

While I agree the people's crusade was foolish and poorly planned, I still think we should remember the atrocities of the Muslims for hundreds of years prior to the first crusade. The Muslims captured Jerusalem in 638. All I am saying is that retaking what Christians believed was Christian Holy Land was a motivation for many. I always hear people downing the crusades, but I rarely hear criticism of the Muslims. We should be fair and balanced in doling out criticism. I don't believe Christians should instigate war in the name of the cross or Christ; however, Christians most certainly have a right to defend our lands, property, children from invading forces. Who glorifies the crusades, or calls for modern crusades? The sources I have read most certainly don't glorify the crusades, but they call for recognition of a complex issue and different time. Ultimately God must have willed the crusades on some level, because they happened. God used bad things in many Biblical accounts to accomplish His purposes. I know you agree. I actually agree that doing what the crusaders did dragged Christ's name through the mud. We are supposed to bring people to Christ through the Gospel, not the sword, but as you said that is not what the crusades were about. I still believe the crusades happened in part to win back land that had been taken from Christian control in prior years. Good video. Thank you.

Baptistic theology is not the best or fullest expression of Christianity.

They take out 1John 5:7 look it up.

Thank you and God bless! ❤❤❤

I will not listen to Rush Limbaugh read anything to me. He is known as a hateful person towards so many of the “lessor” humans in our Country, as he reads a story based on Christianity? Christianity is always about the lessor and downtrodden in any community. He is not respected by me or anyone I know, and anyone who spread so much anger and hatred in our Country should be ignored. I can read “the true story of Thanksgiving” myself.

What you presented is absolute falsehood. Jesus preached the Gospel of the kingdom of God and Paul preached the Gospel of the Grace of God. There are numerous differences between these two. For instance; according to he Gospel of the Kingdom of God, Eternal life is not just by faith, good work is needed including selling everything you have and giving it to poor people (Mat 19:16-29) But according to the Gospel of the Grace of God, a man gets eternal life by only believing Jesus died and rose from the dead for him (Acts 13:48, 1Tim 1:16, 1Cor 15:1-4) Let me add another. Believers of Kingdom Gospel ara destined to inherit the earth (Mat 5:5). But, believers of the Grace Gospel are positioned in the heavenlies (Eph 1:3, 2:6, Phil 3:20) and will go to heaven one day (1Thes 4:17) There are undeniable differences between these two Gospels. And it is a must for one to discern these two. Why? Because, since we are under Grace age, the only Gospel that saves today is the Grace Gospel. The kingdom Gospel doesn't save today. By the way, I heard you say, there is only Gospel. People in yhe old testament are saved by looking forward to the Cross. But there is not a single verse in the Bible to support this argument. The Bible never says Abel or Enoch or Noah, or Job looked forward to the Cross and believed it to get saved. This is just a liar. Please. please, remember that if you are saved you'll be accountable for what you teach when we are presented before the Judgement seat of Christ (Rom 14:10, 2Cor 5:10)

Acts 8:37 USCCB---* [8:37] The oldest and best manuscripts of Acts omit this verse, which is a Western text reading: “And Philip said, 'If you believe with all your heart, you may. ' And he said in reply, 'I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. '” -----Acts 8:37 King James Version 37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. ----ASV--Not have ----Acts 8:37 Amplified Bible 37 [a][Philip said to him, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he replied, “I do believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”] -----CSB--Not have -----ERV--foot note ----ESVUK--NOT have -----Acts 8:37 1599 Geneva Bible 37 [a]And Philip said unto him, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. Then he answered, and said, [b]I believe that that Jesus Christ is that Son of God. -----GNT--foot note -----Acts 8:37 International Children’s Bible 37 [Philip answered, “If you believe with all your heart, you can.” The officer said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”][a] ----Acts 8:37 Legacy Standard Bible 37 [a][And Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”] etc, etc.

Acts 8:37 comes strongly in the Byzantine Majority text. If you like random reading, stay with your corrupted human Textual Criticism. Lat the United Nations dictate your Bible. No difference.

There is 8000 differences between modern versions and the Geneva, King James,New King James. Let the Holy Spirit lead you into all Truth. And not Textul critis. Act 8v37 is a beautiful verse. Find out who Westcott and Hort are and their 1881 Revised version. They were not christians.

Why did Islam come about in the first place? I just think that whole story has some lies in it too. We need to go back to the beginning to right after AD70. The Jewish Roman War was huge. It fulfilled at least partial Bible Prophecy. Many Modern pastors do not want to begin with AD 66:70. I also believe the Roman Classic Empire fell much sooner than what we are told. So, what provoked Muslims and Arabs to suddenly take over territories? The more I learn about the Byzantine Empire, the more I learn about church corruption. Constantine was no angel. He mixed Christianity with his pagan religion. I think AD 70-AD 400 is really important to lay the groundwork for what led up to the Crusades. The Jewish groups must be addressed as many went into Khazaria (Modern Day Ukraine) and mixed pagan religion with Torah creating a very Satanic Occult. Again, our churches keep telling the half stories. Whether the Modern Jews are the original Hebrew people or not is not the issue. The issue is how they practice their religion and bringing Usury Financial system onto the entire Earth. They absolutely are so against the Father and Son, they cannot even say their names. The Talmud is absolutely evil. All of this is part of the Crusades. Now, we got a huge Beast above us across the Earth and most Christians got no idea. Now, we know it as the New World Order or the Deep State.

Knights of Templars did the Crusades?

The Muslims are Ishmael Descendants. So, technically, they are a part of Abraham - they have like 10 or 12 Tribes. The New Covenant is Love the Father first in Jesus Christ then love others. As hard as it is to do that as we see our different nations getting more peoples from other countries, we need to remember love and kindness. We do not need to agree but violence is never an answer. Muslims will see the real Jesus as we show love and kindness. First, they are human beings made in the image of God. Skin color has nothing to do with the Kingdom of God. The top authorities of our day do not want us talking to people different from us because if we do, we may unite together to do good things for the Earth and humanity. Division in humanity keeps the evil only stronger.

Is that a reaction of a sad heart or a self-sufficiency proud heart?

It's not just "Antioch," its all of the region of the Byzantine Empire

You are absolutely full of crap. The whole of Europe was the end game of Islamic caliphate. They held most of Spain and were pushing further north. Islam was not, and has never been, at peace with any non-Islamic state. Either you are ignorant or you are a liar. It was a culture and religious war. Those that acknowledge that Western culture would not have survived without the crusades is not by definition Christian nationalist or right wingers. You sound like an Islamic apologist! ua-cam.com/video/6aFkoX6g1fE/v-deo.htmlsi=klXj1z3tFVfRlYzj

The religious aspect, however flawed, was not the only root for the crusades. It was the constant invasion, warfare, rape, murder, and enslavement of Europeans that drove them to rise up against the Islamic caliphate. ua-cam.com/video/1JbgFJU8PA0/v-deo.htmlsi=OjB2ot5FrwRjk9Zh

First off this verse appears in all of my copies of scripture truth! Everyone! Some 50 + copies In KJV, NKJV, NASB, HCSB, AMPLIFIED, and others! I do not own an NIV, OR a CSV, ESV, CEV and some others, so I cannot speak to those versions! Then even in my copies in Spanish, Albanian, Arabic, Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Italian, and I also have a hand written copy in Aukanar ( Descendants of African slaves that escaped into the jungles of Suriname from the plantations in the 18th and 19th century!) All with the verse of Acts 8:37. Some, like the Amplified, have a reference to that verse not being in some of the earliest manuscripts.....yet it is included in the text! So I'm not sure what you are referring too!

9:35, Irenaus's testimony shows that it likely was original. 9:42 You totally skipped past that.

It's not just this verse, but many others, always attacking the Trinity or promoting a RC view of baptism and works. Where is the line drawn? How do we know a manuscript is good solely because it is old (provided Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are actually old, which is contested)?

Kenny Baldwin was my Youth Pastor

C. H. Spurgeon said, in His day, that He preferred the Revised Version, because He said it was more accurate.

The earliest Acts 8:37 was inserted into the text was 1550

Rev. 1:8 looks like the one who came , died , and is to come again. Boom

I agree with the overall conclusion, but more objective analysis over Isaiah 14 certainly points to it still being in reference to Satan. Although Lucifer not being a “name reference” to Satan. The king of Babylon can be figuratively viewed as Satan, certainly in this passage when the context itself can be interpreted that way. Satan is referred to many times as a light bearer. An angel of light. Etc. That bears consistency with the Hebrew of this passage. Would love a deep study on this. However, you could’ve just debunked the argument in two seconds if you just referenced Job where other angels are referred to as a “Morning Stars” in Job 38. Satan very well was a morning star. At one point. I agree with you that it’s not a contradiction. But I disagree with your interpretation of Isaiah 14 and who’s being addressed as who is this “King of Babylon” is. I believe it’s Satan because of the Hebrew and how the passage has been historically rendered. “Light bearer” or “Morning Star” is never in reference to a human being. Would love your take. Perhaps worth a video. Cross reference to all possible citations to morning star, light bearer, Satan, son of the morning, and reference all passages back to the Greek and Hebrew and see where you land.

Great video. Riddle's argument for "Confessional Bibliography" is trying to pretend any deviation from a LXX quote is proof the LXX didn't exist. He does not, of course, argue that the dozens of quotes disagreeing with the Masoretic Text disproves the validity of that text for text criticism.

Kjv preferred but love Nkjv and NLT and Nasb and Esv

What would be interesting is if you did the same word or phrase search for the KJV. I know from my own searches that Jesus shows up way more times in the NIV than it does in the KJV.

Fake Bibles

It breeds legalism and spiritual abuse

On one hand, it was inevitable the KJVOnlyists turn their fear on the OT. OTOH, this is historic revisionism on par with the Moon Landing didn't happen.