Відео

Going to have to disagree with you. Mine sapphire, and this is directly from Citizen website, "Sapphire Crystal Superior scratch resistance and hardness". Even on the back of the case its says sapphire crystal. Typically $1K and up watches always come with Sapphire crystal. Yes there are exceptions but in this case there is not. Thanks for watching and commenting. www.citizenwatch.com/us/en/product/AV0090-50A.html.

It’s a great watch. Enjoy. Thanks for watching and commenting.

@ great review. Done bought 2 watches because of your reviews. lol.

😂well thanks for watching again and again.

Thanks much appreciated. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Totally agree. A lot of people will say ISO certification means nothing. It means a lot especially depending on how you plan to use that watch. I always looked at like an extra layer of protection and security. Thanks for watching and commenting.

It’s a great watch. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Mine is still under warranty so that wont happen any time soon, but I also dont think the movement is anything work looking at. I think if it was they would have put an exhibition case back on it. Thanks for watching and commenting.

I agree, they definitely stand like 4k. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Very cool. Thanks for your service and thanks for watching and commenting.

No idea could have come down to cost, adds up over thousand of units not sure. You could get new Tudor Pelagos GMT, for a luxury watch super nice. Love my Tudor Pelagos FXD. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Very cool. Sounds like you need a Tudor now 😂. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Very cool info. Did not know that. Thanks for sharing. Thanks for commenting and watching.

The Tudor is unidirectional and the for is bidirectional.

Thanks for the info! Yeah I wish it was more pink. It’s pinker on the website. They do make some good watches for sure. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Yeah 😂, no sure what the 4 Evo is. Evolution? No idea. Check them out really good microbrand. Thanks for watching and commenting.

@@DivingIntoWatches-jb5ri Before being named Aragon, they were called Android, and after Google ruined that for them they had to rebrand. For a small company, they do have a very varied portfolio.

👍

Yes they do. Thanks for watching commenting.

No doubt it’s a popular lume for sure. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Awesome. It’s a fantastic watch. I wear more than any other watch I own. Congrats. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Citizens website has it, and probably find a good used one on EBay. Thanks for watching and commenting.

I was going to let your comment be for what is, but when you hit with the "sanctimonious' well that cant stand. So here is my sanctimonious reply, "Wow, talk about a passionate defense of the Tactical Frog! The energy you’ve put into justifying a €155 "homage" piece is impressive. But let’s be real: this comment reads like a manifesto from someone who wants the street cred of a Tudor without paying the price. Yes, it has a Seiko movement and a titanium case, but comparing it to a €4000 Tudor? That’s like saying your budget airline flight was basically first class because you also arrived at the same destination. The whole argument about it not being a copy is a stretch, too. Sure, it's not a fake-it’s proudly branded as “Tactical Frog”-but let’s not pretend it doesn’t owe Tudor a huge debt in design. The “it’s not a copy because it has its own name” argument is like saying off-brand cola isn’t copying Coca-Cola because it has a different label. And the defense about Seiko's occasional alignment issues? That’s more of a “look over there!” than a point in Tactical Frog’s favor. And while it’s good to hear they finally fixed that wobbly bezel, maybe it’s best to admit the watch is what it is: a decent, low-budget homage, not some hidden gem that’s being unfairly judged.". Sincerely, Sanctimonious

@@DivingIntoWatches-jb5ri Thank you for your response. I admit I thought carefully about using the word 'sanctimonious', not least because we do not know each other and I was obviously unsure how you would react. However, your, at times, passionate review of a watch with which you, at least to my mind, seemed almost determined to put down (for want of a better expression) meant I almost felt as though you were perhaps trying to justify paying the premium for 'the real thing', a watch that you had bought/owned. The Tudor is a watch that I very nearly bought myself (the FXD Red Bull model with the red second hand) but unfortunately missed because it had been sold when I returned to the shop where I had seen it displayed. Also, the 'Frog' is uncannily similar to the Tudor but clearly NOT the original!! But what I was trying to get across is that it offers a hell of a lot for an extremely low price something that Seiko, who you mentioned, simply cannot, or will not, offer. At the end of the day I have the money to buy the original but, as a pensioner, I can't justify the outlay either to me or my wife! The Frog gives me the 'feel' of the real thing - I did actually have the real thing on my wrist in the dealer's showroom before, fortunately, it was sold and not readily available - and the Frog obviously lacks the finesse of the Rolex family. Your review was passionate in part and that is not something I wish to criticise, watches can make passionate people out of us whether we like it or not and that applies to me as much as it does to you. So in that spirit permit me to add that I look forward to your future offerings here on youtube and perhaps I might be permitted a comment or two now and then. Kind regards

@@rogerfairhurst8705no issue taken lol. You are spot on I genuinely have no love for clomage watches. Chinese brands are notorious for ripping off name brands. Borrowing design cues is one thing, flat copy and name change only is another. If you view some of my early watch reviews I do give good reviews of clomage watches. Value is very subjective, what one sees value in others may not. If everyone all liked the same things, it would be a boring world. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Watches are personal preference for sure. I’m headed in the opposite direction😂. Looking at an Omega 300 seamaster. Let me know what you think oof the watch when you get it. I love my Tudor Pelagos FXD. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Depends on if you want the copy of the marine national or the seals version. Difference is in the bezel one uni-directional and one is bi-directional.

@DivingIntoWatches-jb5ri blue being the marine national correct?

Only one word. Nope. 👎 😂

I have never had an issue. Sometimes people come up with things cause they heard it from someone from someone. I have Tudor Pelagos FXD in my bathroom all the time. Thanks for watching and commenting.

You’re totally right! Both Hamilton and Rolex can absolutely get the job done when it comes to telling time, and Hamilton has a great reputation for quality, too. But as you said, what sets Rolex apart isn’t just precision - it’s the history, the iconic design, and the brand legacy. It’s kind of like the difference between driving a car that works and one that carries a legacy, like a Porsche. Both can be fantastic in their own ways, but one carries that extra layer of history and exclusivity that enthusiasts really appreciate.

Ah, you "gave up" after the band colors? Impressive endurance! I’m surprised you made it that far-I bet choosing cereal in the morning is a real mental marathon for you. Guess some people are more “surface level” swimmers when it comes to deep dives!

Thanks for watching and commenting.

It is, and I brought that up in the video as one of my complaints about quartz watches.

@@DivingIntoWatches-jb5ri Sorry mustn't have been paying attention!

Good choice! Congrats. It’s a great watch. Thanks for watching and commenting.

I agree this one is best of the three. Congrats on the purchase thanks for watching and commenting.

@@rrich52806 never said there was. Watch the whole video.

The tourbillon movement: the ultimate watch flex that screams, “Look at me, I’m spinning!” It’s like putting a fancy window on a car that doesn’t even drive straight. Sure, it’s an engineering marvel, but it’s a bit like wearing a tuxedo to a barbecue-impressive, but totally unnecessary for the occasion. Plus, for the price of one, you could buy a dozen reliable watches that actually tell time.

@@couchoperator561 well you can go to their website and shoot them an email and let them . I don’t think putting a $12 NH35 would have been better.

Quartz is accurate and more durable than mechanical. I love mechanical but quartz has its place.

Which Quarz Movement would you prefer? For a military watch a good quartz movement is the better choice imho.

@@knutjunker2019 I have always preferred automatics. They don't fail, battery go dead when I was in some go third world country etc. In the circles I ran in and the units I worked with autos were the watch of the day, Tudor, Rolex, Omega, Paneri, Seiko etc. I did wear my issued G-shock now and then but only during training state side. Anytime I left the country it was an auto on my wrist. I would take my G-shock for back up just in case. I did seen smart watch's, Garmin's etc., but these can be tracked and you cant wear them in the SCIF due to their internet connection. Autos don't go dead, cant be hacked and cant be tracked lol. I just prefer autos. I would wear my Citizen EcoDrive Aqualand stateside but during training only. I have quartz watches, they are just not my preferred watch. Its a personal choice. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Glad you enjoyed it

Totally agree awesome watch. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Great story and thanks for sharing. Thanks for watching and commenting.

The date should switch over at midnight, you can also unscrew the crown and pull out to drift position and turn the crown either clockwise or counterclockwise and the date will change. Set the time to 6pm, then set the date to the day before you want, then got back to time setting and turn hands toll date changes to your dearie date, set the time, screw in the crown and your done. Let me know if that helps. Very rarely you can get a bad watch, but without seeing the watch can’t say. I have never had watch I couldn’t set the date. Did have one Seiko right out box that wouldn’t hand wind had to send it back snd replace it.

The blue strap will fit. I have a 6.25 inch wrist. I just don’t like the all writing on the blue strap and it’s not as comfortable as the strap I replaced it with. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Never said it was titanium. So do get the comment.

Oh, my bad! I didn’t realize the world revolved around your shopping habits. Thanks for the geography lesson!

Honestly, no one cares about your take on the “K” version. It’s clear you’re trying really hard to make a point, but most people just aren’t interested.

@@DivingIntoWatches-jb5ri, you're right! All Americans trully need some geography lessons. Because 90% of them are stupid enough and have no idea about the planet they're living on. So, thanks! Good point...

It’s a great watch no doubt. The factory rubber more like plastic strap just sucked. That’s why I changed it out. Haven’t seen one a metal bracelet. Not a bad idea. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Long Island Watch makes stainless bracelets in oyster and jubilee with fitted end links for several dive watch brands citizen included. Check them out ..